Re: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem
James, The change resolved the problem that I was having. Thanks, Tat James Carman wrote: Oh, sorry. I committed a change to my tapernate-example application which implements this change. For those of you who were encountering this problem, can you download it and try out the changes? Thanks! -Original Message- From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 9:31 PM To: 'Tapestry users' Subject: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem Well, I could specify *all* of the workers that I want my auto-wire worker to follow by using a comma-separated list. That might do the trick! -Original Message- From: Mark Lehmacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 6:04 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem Importance: High The way I see it, it definitely IS the ordering: When you contribute the autowirer with before="tapestry.enhance.abstract-property" and after="tapestry.enhance.dispatch-inject" parameters you don't guarantee that the parameter-worker already performed it's work, because it is not part of those services which make up dispatch-inject. The ordering of the enhancement workers is unspecified and relies on the underlying Hivemind Order object, which in turn is backed by a HashMap. So I guess if you add one or several enhancement workers to your chain you will get the same problem sooner or later (as soon as the HashMap fucks up the ordering for you and the parameter-worker runs before your autowire-worker). However, I'd really love to see a working autowiring function like that. If it goes into the tapestry core it could be combined into the abstract-property-worker, which would solve the ordering problem but raise other questions instead (like seperation of concerns). --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: "James Carman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: "'Tapestry users'" Betreff: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem Datum: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:57:05 -0400 I thought the ordering was getting screwed up too. But, I added LoggingInterceptor to the ParameterPropertyWorker and my auto-wire worker and the parameter one seems to be running first. If the parameter worker runs first, this problem should not occur, since the property would have already been claimed and my worker would just bypass it. I intentionally put my worker after all that stuff, so I wouldn't step on anyone's toes. I wonder if there's some special case that's getting the ordering screwed up? -Original Message- From: Mark Lehmacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 6:31 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem Importance: High Yup, that's what I am saying. Looks like it's wiring component parameters as well: 5705 HiveMindAutowireWorker:performEnhancement [DEBUG] Creating auto-wired accessor for property delegate on component classpath:/org/apache/tapestry/html/Shell.jwc, line 22, column 96 5856 HiveMindAutowireWorker:performEnhancement [DEBUG] Creating auto-wired accessor for property delegate on component classpath:/org/apache/tapestry/html/Shell.jwc, line 22, column 96 With the result of getting this error: Error at classpath:/org/apache/tapestry/html/Shell.jwc, line 78, column 20: Error adding property delegate to class org.apache.tapestry.html.Shell: Property delegate has already been claimed by a different enhancement worker. So my uneducated guess is that somewhere in the depths of tapestry there might be a service which implements IValidationDelegate and it's gets wired to the component parameter. Looks like the order gets somehow fucked-up, because at the point at which the autowire stuff comes in all parameter properties should have already been claimed. So it probably has to do with the configuration contribution taking place in the seperate module descriptor within my drop-in jar. --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: "James Carman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: "'Tapestry users'" Betreff: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem Datum: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:25:17 -0400 H. That's weird. But, thanks for the tip. I've submitted the code as a patch to Tapestry. So, I need to figure out how to get it working. So, what you're saying is that if the auto-wiring stuff is inside a jar file and not part of your application's hivemodule.xml file, then it bombs? -Original Message- From: Mark Lehmacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 5:21 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem Importance: High I had that very same problem when I tried to package the Tapernate auto-wiring stuff in a drop-in jar. It said that one of the parameters of the Shell component has already been claimed by a different enhancement worker. When I just put the service definition and configuration contribution i
RE: ServletRequestServicerFilter not getting exceptions?
Tapernate relies on spring's ta-demarcation stuff to mark ta's for rollback.
So, if something happens above your dao-layer, spring can't know it.
I override DirectService to this end, see below. Something similar should
also work with
tapernate-style SessionFactory instead of "svc".
public class TransactionalDirectService extends DirectService {
private PersistenceService svc;
private Log log;
public TransactionalDirectService( PersistenceService s ) {
svc = s;
}
public void setLog( Log l ) {
log = l;
}
@Override
protected void triggerComponent(IRequestCycle cycle, IDirect direct,
Object[] parameters) {
try {
log.debug("Trigger component transactional");
super.triggerComponent(cycle, direct, parameters);
log.debug("Trigger component success - committing");
svc.commit();
} catch ( StaleObjectStateException e ){
log.debug("Stale object - rolling back");
svc.rollback();
cycle.activate("StaleObject");
} catch ( RuntimeException e ) {
log.debug("Trigger component threw - rolling back");
svc.rollback();
throw e;
}
}
}
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Dyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 7:14 PM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: ServletRequestServicerFilter not getting exceptions?
>
>
> I've written a ServletRequestServicerFilter for implementing an
> open-session-in-view filter, much like the one in Tapernate
> (in fact, I used
> TapernateFilter as my reference.)
>
> In the no-exception case, it works fine. However, I was
> assuming that page
> exceptions would get thrown back to the filter and at that
> point I could roll
> back my Hibernate transaction. Unfortunately, exceptions
> never seem to get
> passed to the filter.
>
> So, my question. Is this a bug? If not, where would be the
> proper place to
> rollback transactions and so-forth when an exception is thrown?
>
> For reference, here's my code--it's pretty straight forward:
>
> public class HibernateServiceFilter implements
> ServletRequestServicerFilter {
>
> private SessionManager sessionManager;
> private String FLAG = this.getClass().getName() + ".ALREADY-CALLED";
>
> public void service(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse
> response, ServletRequestServicer servicer) throws IOException,
> ServletException {
> if (Boolean.TRUE.equals(request.getAttribute(FLAG))) {
> servicer.service(request, response);
> } else {
> try {
> request.setAttribute(FLAG, Boolean.TRUE);
> servicer.service(request, response);
> } catch (Throwable t) {
> sessionManager.setToRollback();
> throw new ServletException("An exception was trapped by
> HibernateServiceFilter.", t);
> } finally {
> sessionManager.endTransaction();
> }
> }
> }
>
> public void setSessionManager(SessionManager sessionManager) {
> this.sessionManager = sessionManager;
> }
> }
>
>
> TIA,
> -Jason
>
> --
>
> --
> People who push both buttons should get their wish.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: publicnudity
LOL LOL LOL LOL!! Regards Varun Mehta *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* imagination is more important than knowledge - albert einstein *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Visit Varun at * http://varun.cjb.net [HTML] * http://varuninfo.cjb.net [Blogged] * http://varunmehta.cjb.net [Flash] -Original Message- From: Martin Strand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 12:35 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: publicnudity > One of the only websites on the internet with real public sex, Hooray, is it Tapestry based? On Tue, 09 May 2006 23:02:06 +0300, Apache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Welcome to Public Invasion. One of the only websites on the internet > with real public sex, > this is not staged. The girls are hot and the settings are in public > places, > many times i must move or else i get caught and arrested! > many times police all most catch me hehe. > http://www.publicnudity.gj5uy.info - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tapestryforums.com
Nice idea. Bad execution. +1 to giving it the boot. Geoff On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapestryforums.com. As we receive a ~lot~ of spam from this service every day I'm less and less enthusiastic about its continued operation. (at least as far as sending emails to our users list goes) Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots or discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this matter but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with the proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. -- The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman Other interests: http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tapestryforums.com
Jesse Kuhnert gmail.com> writes: > I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapestryforums.com. As we > receive a ~lot~ of spam from this service every day I'm less and less > enthusiastic about its continued operation. (at least as far as sending > emails to our users list goes) +1 -- Kent Tong Author of a book for learning Tapestry (http://www.agileskills2.org/EWDT) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We sell e-mail lists and soft for email marketing!
We sell e-mail lists and soft for email marketing! 1. 90 millions fresh e-mail (date - 1.05.06, delivery - 95%) - 2500$ 2. 2 CD lists by country, servers, adult, casino, farma. we have many list and bases, please write us [EMAIL PROTECTED] m2f Sent from www.TapestryForums.com Read this topic online here: <> http://www.tapestryforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=14791#14791 m2f
Re: Mike's DynamicBlock in Tap4
Thanks all :-) I'm indeed using Tomcat, I'll go with the tapestry solution instead. Thanks regards, On 5/10/06, Dennis Cieplik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > If anyone successfully tested Michael Henderson's DynamicBlock in Tap4? > The > error I had encountered was 'factory already defined' java.lang.error. The > example that downloaded from Michael Henderson's website has the same > error. The example works in jetty and breaks in tomcat. I traced it down to a URLStreamHandler call inside the component. This causes a 'factory already defined' java.lang.error. Furthermore there is no source code available, which could be a problem for some projects (and was for our). I would rather go with a tapestry solution, namely renderblock and block, than with DynamicBlock. You might loose some degree of freedom, but it actually works. Dennis -- Analog-/ISDN-Nutzer sparen mit GMX SmartSurfer bis zu 70%! Kostenlos downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Testing pages
Rob Dennett wrote:
Since that is the case, how do you affect the services of a page?
For example, page 1 of my app is a login page. In order to get to
page 2, there needs to be a user in the database. I can fill in the
username and password fields on page 1 and click submit using
HtmlUnit, but it doesn't take me to page 2 because there is no data
in the database. I'd like to either get access to the database (I am
using an in-memory instance of HSQL for testing purposes) or give
page 1 a fake service which accepts the fake username and password
that HtmlUnit passes to it. Is there anyway to do that, or am I
totally misusing HtmlUnit?
Create a TestLoginPageCaller which is itself an external page. What
it does is to do something like:
void activateExternalPage() {
Login login = (Login)cycle.getPage("Login");
login.setUserAuthenticator(new UserAuthenticator() {
void authenticate(String userName, String passwd) {
//your fake implementation
}
});
cycle.activate(login);
}
--
Kent Tong, Msc, MCSE, SCJP, CCSA, Delphi Certified
Manager of IT Dept, CPTTM
Authorized training for Borland, Cisco, Microsoft, Oracle, RedFlag & RedHat
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem
Oh, sorry. I committed a change to my tapernate-example application which implements this change. For those of you who were encountering this problem, can you download it and try out the changes? Thanks! -Original Message- From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 9:31 PM To: 'Tapestry users' Subject: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem Well, I could specify *all* of the workers that I want my auto-wire worker to follow by using a comma-separated list. That might do the trick! -Original Message- From: Mark Lehmacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 6:04 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem Importance: High The way I see it, it definitely IS the ordering: When you contribute the autowirer with before="tapestry.enhance.abstract-property" and after="tapestry.enhance.dispatch-inject" parameters you don't guarantee that the parameter-worker already performed it's work, because it is not part of those services which make up dispatch-inject. The ordering of the enhancement workers is unspecified and relies on the underlying Hivemind Order object, which in turn is backed by a HashMap. So I guess if you add one or several enhancement workers to your chain you will get the same problem sooner or later (as soon as the HashMap fucks up the ordering for you and the parameter-worker runs before your autowire-worker). However, I'd really love to see a working autowiring function like that. If it goes into the tapestry core it could be combined into the abstract-property-worker, which would solve the ordering problem but raise other questions instead (like seperation of concerns). > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: "James Carman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: "'Tapestry users'" > Betreff: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem > Datum: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:57:05 -0400 > > I thought the ordering was getting screwed up too. But, I added > LoggingInterceptor to the ParameterPropertyWorker and my auto-wire worker > and the parameter one seems to be running first. If the parameter worker > runs first, this problem should not occur, since the property would have > already been claimed and my worker would just bypass it. I intentionally > put my worker after all that stuff, so I wouldn't step on anyone's toes. > I > wonder if there's some special case that's getting the ordering screwed > up? > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Lehmacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 6:31 AM > To: Tapestry users > Subject: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem > Importance: High > > Yup, that's what I am saying. > > Looks like it's wiring component parameters as well: > > 5705 HiveMindAutowireWorker:performEnhancement [DEBUG] Creating auto-wired > accessor for property delegate on component > classpath:/org/apache/tapestry/html/Shell.jwc, line 22, column 96 > 5856 HiveMindAutowireWorker:performEnhancement [DEBUG] Creating auto-wired > accessor for property delegate on component > classpath:/org/apache/tapestry/html/Shell.jwc, line 22, column 96 > > With the result of getting this error: > > Error at classpath:/org/apache/tapestry/html/Shell.jwc, line 78, column > 20: > Error adding property delegate to class org.apache.tapestry.html.Shell: > Property delegate has already been claimed by a different enhancement > worker. > > > So my uneducated guess is that somewhere in the depths of tapestry there > might be a service which implements IValidationDelegate and it's gets > wired > to the component parameter. Looks like the order gets somehow fucked-up, > because at the point at which the autowire stuff comes in all parameter > properties should have already been claimed. So it probably has to do > with > the configuration contribution taking place in the seperate module > descriptor within my drop-in jar. > > > > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > > Von: "James Carman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > An: "'Tapestry users'" > > Betreff: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem > > Datum: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:25:17 -0400 > > > > H. That's weird. But, thanks for the tip. I've submitted the code > > as > > a patch to Tapestry. So, I need to figure out how to get it working. > So, > > what you're saying is that if the auto-wiring stuff is inside a jar file > > and > > not part of your application's hivemodule.xml file, then it bombs? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Lehmacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 5:21 PM > > To: Tapestry users > > Subject: Re: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem > > Importance: High > > > > I had that very same problem when I tried to package the Tapernate > > auto-wiring stuff in a drop-in jar. It said that one of the parameters > of > > the Shell component has already been claimed by a different enhancement > > worker. > > > > Whe
RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem
Can those of you verify that this fix works (if it actually does)? I can't actually duplicate the behavior that you saw. But, I think this might be either a HiveMind bug or we need to beef up the documentation a bit. -Original Message- From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 9:31 PM To: 'Tapestry users' Subject: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem Well, I could specify *all* of the workers that I want my auto-wire worker to follow by using a comma-separated list. That might do the trick! -Original Message- From: Mark Lehmacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 6:04 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem Importance: High The way I see it, it definitely IS the ordering: When you contribute the autowirer with before="tapestry.enhance.abstract-property" and after="tapestry.enhance.dispatch-inject" parameters you don't guarantee that the parameter-worker already performed it's work, because it is not part of those services which make up dispatch-inject. The ordering of the enhancement workers is unspecified and relies on the underlying Hivemind Order object, which in turn is backed by a HashMap. So I guess if you add one or several enhancement workers to your chain you will get the same problem sooner or later (as soon as the HashMap fucks up the ordering for you and the parameter-worker runs before your autowire-worker). However, I'd really love to see a working autowiring function like that. If it goes into the tapestry core it could be combined into the abstract-property-worker, which would solve the ordering problem but raise other questions instead (like seperation of concerns). > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: "James Carman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: "'Tapestry users'" > Betreff: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem > Datum: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:57:05 -0400 > > I thought the ordering was getting screwed up too. But, I added > LoggingInterceptor to the ParameterPropertyWorker and my auto-wire worker > and the parameter one seems to be running first. If the parameter worker > runs first, this problem should not occur, since the property would have > already been claimed and my worker would just bypass it. I intentionally > put my worker after all that stuff, so I wouldn't step on anyone's toes. > I > wonder if there's some special case that's getting the ordering screwed > up? > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Lehmacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 6:31 AM > To: Tapestry users > Subject: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem > Importance: High > > Yup, that's what I am saying. > > Looks like it's wiring component parameters as well: > > 5705 HiveMindAutowireWorker:performEnhancement [DEBUG] Creating auto-wired > accessor for property delegate on component > classpath:/org/apache/tapestry/html/Shell.jwc, line 22, column 96 > 5856 HiveMindAutowireWorker:performEnhancement [DEBUG] Creating auto-wired > accessor for property delegate on component > classpath:/org/apache/tapestry/html/Shell.jwc, line 22, column 96 > > With the result of getting this error: > > Error at classpath:/org/apache/tapestry/html/Shell.jwc, line 78, column > 20: > Error adding property delegate to class org.apache.tapestry.html.Shell: > Property delegate has already been claimed by a different enhancement > worker. > > > So my uneducated guess is that somewhere in the depths of tapestry there > might be a service which implements IValidationDelegate and it's gets > wired > to the component parameter. Looks like the order gets somehow fucked-up, > because at the point at which the autowire stuff comes in all parameter > properties should have already been claimed. So it probably has to do > with > the configuration contribution taking place in the seperate module > descriptor within my drop-in jar. > > > > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > > Von: "James Carman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > An: "'Tapestry users'" > > Betreff: RE: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem > > Datum: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:25:17 -0400 > > > > H. That's weird. But, thanks for the tip. I've submitted the code > > as > > a patch to Tapestry. So, I need to figure out how to get it working. > So, > > what you're saying is that if the auto-wiring stuff is inside a jar file > > and > > not part of your application's hivemodule.xml file, then it bombs? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Lehmacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 5:21 PM > > To: Tapestry users > > Subject: Re: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem > > Importance: High > > > > I had that very same problem when I tried to package the Tapernate > > auto-wiring stuff in a drop-in jar. It said that one of the parameters > of > > the Shell component has already been claimed by a different enhancement > > worker. >
Re: Validation
Tapestry is helping me avoid a lot of pain On 5/10/06, Pedro Viegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :-D No pain no gain! On 5/10/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was just wondering if I was going to have to write .page files for every > .html page that required validation. > Now that my blindness has been healed, I am happily adding validators="" > to > all tags on all my .html pages :D > > On 5/10/06, Pedro Viegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If you do all the binding in the .html template, and the class to page > > binding in the .application you don't need the .page in Tap4. > > Be more specific if this was not the answer you were looking for. > > > > Regards, > > > > On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > In Tapestry 4 when doing validation, must I always place the binding > tag > > > on > > > the page specification or can I do it on the .application file? > > > > > > I am asking because my application uses a fair amount of classes and I > > am > > > simply maping pages to classes through the .application file and I am > > > wondering if I'll have to create all the .page files now. > > > > > > -- > > > Cumprimentos, > > > Rui Pacheco > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Pedro Viegas > > > > > > > -- > Cumprimentos, > Rui Pacheco > > -- Pedro Viegas -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco
Re: Validation
:-D No pain no gain! On 5/10/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was just wondering if I was going to have to write .page files for every .html page that required validation. Now that my blindness has been healed, I am happily adding validators="" to all tags on all my .html pages :D On 5/10/06, Pedro Viegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you do all the binding in the .html template, and the class to page > binding in the .application you don't need the .page in Tap4. > Be more specific if this was not the answer you were looking for. > > Regards, > > On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi all > > > > In Tapestry 4 when doing validation, must I always place the binding tag > > on > > the page specification or can I do it on the .application file? > > > > I am asking because my application uses a fair amount of classes and I > am > > simply maping pages to classes through the .application file and I am > > wondering if I'll have to create all the .page files now. > > > > -- > > Cumprimentos, > > Rui Pacheco > > > > > > > -- > Pedro Viegas > > -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco -- Pedro Viegas
Re: Validation on Tapestry 4
You might not believe me, but I only saw the "validators" attribute now. And I've been looking at that page for the past 2 hours. On 5/10/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/UsersGuide/validation.html On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone, someone... Could you provide me with an example of validation in > Tapestry 4? Is it possible to do it inline in the html, something like > ? > > I have been searching on the net, but the examples that I see are only for > Tapestry 3 and the ones for Tapestry 4 don't touch validation at all. > > -- > Cumprimentos, > Rui Pacheco > > -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco
Re: Validation
I was just wondering if I was going to have to write .page files for every .html page that required validation. Now that my blindness has been healed, I am happily adding validators="" to all tags on all my .html pages :D On 5/10/06, Pedro Viegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you do all the binding in the .html template, and the class to page binding in the .application you don't need the .page in Tap4. Be more specific if this was not the answer you were looking for. Regards, On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all > > In Tapestry 4 when doing validation, must I always place the binding tag > on > the page specification or can I do it on the .application file? > > I am asking because my application uses a fair amount of classes and I am > simply maping pages to classes through the .application file and I am > wondering if I'll have to create all the .page files now. > > -- > Cumprimentos, > Rui Pacheco > > -- Pedro Viegas -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco
Re: Validation
If you do all the binding in the .html template, and the class to page binding in the .application you don't need the .page in Tap4. Be more specific if this was not the answer you were looking for. Regards, On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all In Tapestry 4 when doing validation, must I always place the binding tag on the page specification or can I do it on the .application file? I am asking because my application uses a fair amount of classes and I am simply maping pages to classes through the .application file and I am wondering if I'll have to create all the .page files now. -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco -- Pedro Viegas
Re: Validation on Tapestry 4
There are a few validators that come with Tapestry: http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/UsersGuide/validation.html#validation.fields You can also define your own via the configuration point "tapestry.form.validator.Validators". Martin On Wed, 10 May 2006 02:22:07 +0300, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone, someone... Could you provide me with an example of validation in Tapestry 4? Is it possible to do it inline in the html, something like ? I have been searching on the net, but the examples that I see are only for Tapestry 3 and the ones for Tapestry 4 don't touch validation at all. -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Validation on Tapestry 4
Hi Rui, Yes it is possible to do it inline. Something like: You can see more examples in: http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/tapestry/ComponentReference/ValidField.html Although this link if for Tap3's ValidField, the validator and translator attributes are available in TextField in Tap4. Regards, On 5/10/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone, someone... Could you provide me with an example of validation in Tapestry 4? Is it possible to do it inline in the html, something like ? I have been searching on the net, but the examples that I see are only for Tapestry 3 and the ones for Tapestry 4 don't touch validation at all. -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco -- Pedro Viegas
Re: Validation on Tapestry 4
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/UsersGuide/validation.html On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone, someone... Could you provide me with an example of validation in Tapestry 4? Is it possible to do it inline in the html, something like ? I have been searching on the net, but the examples that I see are only for Tapestry 3 and the ones for Tapestry 4 don't touch validation at all. -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
Validation on Tapestry 4
Anyone, someone... Could you provide me with an example of validation in Tapestry 4? Is it possible to do it inline in the html, something like ? I have been searching on the net, but the examples that I see are only for Tapestry 3 and the ones for Tapestry 4 don't touch validation at all. -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco
Validation
Hi all In Tapestry 4 when doing validation, must I always place the binding tag on the page specification or can I do it on the .application file? I am asking because my application uses a fair amount of classes and I am simply maping pages to classes through the .application file and I am wondering if I'll have to create all the .page files now. -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco
Re: tapestryforums.com
Been complaining about this myself, even replied in anger to one previously. +1! Whatever has to be done, Rui's idea may be of use. Let's all press this on. On 5/9/06, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jesse, you said you're not looking for a consensus, but in case you change your mind here it goes:+1 Jesse Kuhnert wrote: > Ok it looks like there's a general consensus. > > Any word from tapestryforums ? (I found the cc'ed email addy on the site) > > On 5/9/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Are people really taking the time to manually post spam to the forum, or >> have they circumvented the "captcha" feature of tapestryforums.com? >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Wayland Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:12 AM >> To: Tapestry users >> Subject: Re: tapestryforums.com >> >> The forum administrator has installed forwarding software that will send >> an >> email to our list for each post that gets posted to his forum. >> Problem is >> he >> has little spam protection, so people spamming his forums get their >> posts >> automatically forwarded to us lucky folk on this list. >> >> >> On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > I dont understand: how can the forum spam the mailing list? I'm >> missing >> > something on the chain of events. >> > Anyway, that forum is pretty low traffic, there aren't that many >> people >> > answering questions there. >> > >> > On 5/9/06, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > > On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam >> bots >> > or >> > > > discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in >> this >> > > matter >> > > > but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up >> with >> > > the >> > > > proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. >> > > >> > > You definitely speak for me. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > regards, >> > > Robin >> > > >> > > >> - >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Cumprimentos, >> > Rui Pacheco >> > >> > >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > -- > Jesse Kuhnert > Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer > > Open source based consulting work centered around > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Pedro Viegas
Re: publicnudity
Consider it a vote for better Tapestry documentation. Paul Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/09/2006 01:47 PM Please respond to "Tapestry users" To "Tapestry users" cc Subject Re: publicnudity On May 9, 2006, at 2:04 PM, Martin Strand wrote: >> One of the only websites on the internet with real public sex, > > Hooray, is it Tapestry based? The the website, or the public sex? If the latter, this is a side of Tapestry I never knew about. P _ Piano music podcast: http://inthehands.com Other interesting stuff: http://innig.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: publicnudity
On May 9, 2006, at 2:04 PM, Martin Strand wrote: One of the only websites on the internet with real public sex, Hooray, is it Tapestry based? The the website, or the public sex? If the latter, this is a side of Tapestry I never knew about. P _ Piano music podcast: http://inthehands.com Other interesting stuff: http://innig.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: publicnudity
Heh.. The tapestryforums.com owner said he thought it had been disabled already but promised he'd look at it again when he gets back from vacation. I forwarded the message below to him. On 5/9/06, Martin Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of the only websites on the internet with real public sex, Hooray, is it Tapestry based? On Tue, 09 May 2006 23:02:06 +0300, Apache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Welcome to Public Invasion. One of the only websites on the internet > with real public sex, > this is not staged. The girls are hot and the settings are in public > places, > many times i must move or else i get caught and arrested! > many times police all most catch me hehe. > http://www.publicnudity.gj5uy.info - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
Re: publicnudity
One of the only websites on the internet with real public sex, Hooray, is it Tapestry based? On Tue, 09 May 2006 23:02:06 +0300, Apache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Welcome to Public Invasion. One of the only websites on the internet with real public sex, this is not staged. The girls are hot and the settings are in public places, many times i must move or else i get caught and arrested! many times police all most catch me hehe. http://www.publicnudity.gj5uy.info - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SOLVED] How to pass in a message key *and* parameters into a ValidationDelegate
Just for the record: I solved it. It appears that the ValidationDelegate
is *not* looking up messages in the resource bundle, but that my own
code did just that, a bit further down the line. So my own code tried to
look up a message that was allready the result of a resource bundle
lookup, and hence did not find it. Fixed my own code and now all works fine.
Ciao,
Martijn
Martijn Hinten wrote:
Hi,
The method
record(String message, ValidationConstraint constraint)
of
org.apache.tapestry.valid.ValidationDelegate
will lookup any message automatically in the message property file.
However there does not seem to be a record-method that allows me to
pass in both the message-key and any substitution parameters, for example
// DOES NOT EXIST:
record(String message, String[] parameters, ValidationConstraint
constraint)
When I try to trick Tapestry, by formatting the message myself, before
passing it in, like this:
record(getMessages().formatMessage("my-key",new String{"My-param"}, null)
..it will still try to lookup the complete formatted message in the
property file, and - obviously - won't find it and I end up with the
complete message text capitalized, between brackets ( like this:
"[HELLO THIS IS MY MESSAGE WITH MY PARAM: FOO]").
Does anybody out there know of any way to either:
- pass in message-substitution-paramaters into ValidationDelegate's
record() method
- disable ValidationDelegate's record() method from looking up
messages in the property file, so that I can pass in a pre-formatted
message
Thanks for any input. I did look into the archives and didn't find an
answer yet. If I overlooked it, my humble apologies.
Thanks,
Martijn
--
*Cumquat Information Technology*
De Dreef 19
3706 BR Zeist
T +31 (0)30 - 6940490
F +31 (0)10 - 6940499
http://www.cumquat.nl
M +31 6 22 384 318
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to set the focus on a form ?
If you set focus=false, you can at least roll a little of your own javascript to do the trick. It doesn't take much. On May 9, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Stephane Decleire wrote: It seems that it doesn't let the developper much possibilities ... Isn't there any possibilities to choose at the rendering a specific field to put the focus on ? :-( Andreas Bulling wrote: On 09. Mai 2006 - 18:51:21, Stephane Decleire wrote: | Hi all, | | I need to set the focus on a different element of a form than the | default one. | I've tried to find this functionnality in the validationdelegate wihout | success. -> http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/tapestry/ComponentReference/ Form.html Parameter focus Hope that helps, Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Stéphane Decleire 05 56 57 99 20 06 63 78 69 06 _ Piano music podcast: http://inthehands.com Other interesting stuff: http://innig.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loading problems - all components render in the page, calling all the stored procedures
First off, we're using Tapestry 3.0.3. We have a page that conditionally decides which component to render, choosing from about 10 or different types. Each of these components have multiple (avg of about 5) components inside. Now, when this page loads, it loads all 10 components, and all the components on each of the 10. Every one of these components need to call the database, so we're getting about 50 stored procedure calls every time the page loads. The components are surrounded by FormConditionals, and we're doing the 'rewind check' at the beginning of the pageBeginRender method. I can't think of what to check next. Any suggestions or ideas on to what's causing this behavior? Thanks, Jer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Slightly OT: Public Tapestry based site and service is seeking users, testers, and contributers
Wow! looks great! On 5/9/06, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I guess your mouse hoovered over grayed javadoc or source icons on the way to the popup, that closes the currently open tip and displays the new one. This is the way overlib works. I guess that easy fix would be to display popups only by onmouseclick hook rather than try to use onmouseover, but I want to explain why the icon is grayed out without necessity to click, I think it is not natural thing to click on gray controls these days. In any case all suggestions are welcome. Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yea, really nice service. But those tooltips get on my nerves... they close before i hover into them... grr Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On 5/8/06, Konstantin Ignatyev wrote: > >> Let me invite you to try and use the public >> Tapestry based application I have been developing for a while and my >> company SourceLabs supports and hosts > > Wow! > > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to set the focus on a form ?
It seems that it doesn't let the developper much possibilities ... Isn't there any possibilities to choose at the rendering a specific field to put the focus on ? :-( Andreas Bulling wrote: On 09. Mai 2006 - 18:51:21, Stephane Decleire wrote: | Hi all, | | I need to set the focus on a different element of a form than the | default one. | I've tried to find this functionnality in the validationdelegate wihout | success. -> http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/tapestry/ComponentReference/Form.html Parameter focus Hope that helps, Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Stéphane Decleire 05 56 57 99 20 06 63 78 69 06
Re: Mike's DynamicBlock in Tap4
Hi, > If anyone successfully tested Michael Henderson's DynamicBlock in Tap4? > The > error I had encountered was 'factory already defined' java.lang.error. The > example that downloaded from Michael Henderson's website has the same > error. The example works in jetty and breaks in tomcat. I traced it down to a URLStreamHandler call inside the component. This causes a 'factory already defined' java.lang.error. Furthermore there is no source code available, which could be a problem for some projects (and was for our). I would rather go with a tapestry solution, namely renderblock and block, than with DynamicBlock. You might loose some degree of freedom, but it actually works. Dennis -- Analog-/ISDN-Nutzer sparen mit GMX SmartSurfer bis zu 70%! Kostenlos downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to set the focus on a form ?
On 09. Mai 2006 - 18:51:21, Stephane Decleire wrote: | Hi all, | | I need to set the focus on a different element of a form than the | default one. | I've tried to find this functionnality in the validationdelegate wihout | success. -> http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/tapestry/ComponentReference/Form.html Parameter focus Hope that helps, Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Testing pages
I do use Creator when I want to test listener methods, but I also want to use HtmlUnit to check the rendered output. I don't know how to give my page the input it needs to render that output. The pages in question derive the input from an injected service which draws the info from the database. During testing, I am using an in-memory instance of HSQL which has no data in it at startup. Am I totally misusing the tools here? Thanks for your help, Rob -Original Message- From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 7:47 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Testing pages You shouldn't necessarily use HiveMind at all during unit testing. How would you propose that HiveMind inject a mock object? Mock objects have to be trained. You'd have to write a special ServiceImplementationFactory to create the mock object and train it just so HiveMind could inject it. That's overkill, IMHO. I'd just use the Creator to create your pages. > I don't know how, but somehow my original response wound up on the > wrong thread. Here is is: > > If you are using spring or hivemind to inject a service object into a > page (and you should be), then it is simply a matter of modifying your > applicationContext.xml or hivemodule.xml to inject your mock object > instead of the real one. Such functionality is one of the greatest > strengths of IoC containers. > > --sam > > On 5/5/06, Rob Dennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Don't you have to run your application within the container in order to >> use HtmlUnit? If so, when you create an instance of a page using >> Creator, how do you make Tapestry use that instance to render the output >> that you test with HtmlUnit? Is there a way to attach it to the page >> pool and guarantee that it is the one used? >> >> Thanks for your help, >> Rob >> >> -Original Message- >> From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:05 PM >> To: 'Tapestry users' >> Subject: RE: Testing pages >> >> When you use the Creator, you pass in a Map of properties. I believe >> the >> map keys are the property names and the values are the values that the >> Creator will bind to the properties. So, you'd put your mock object >> into >> the map with the appropriate property name as the key. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Rob Dennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:55 PM >> To: Tapestry users >> Subject: RE: Testing pages >> >> Let's say that the page injects a service which has a routine called >> getFoo >> and that this routine calls upon the database for values to return. Is >> there a way that I can inject a mock service into my page rather than a >> the >> real service? >> >> Thanks for your help, >> Rob >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Henri Dupre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 11:38 AM >> To: Tapestry users >> Subject: Re: Testing pages >> >> We implemented all our tests with HtmlUnit. I'm very happy with it. With >> tapestry 4, there is an id tag rendered with every component, it makes >> it >> very easy to test stuff with HtmlUnit! >> I'm not sure what do you mean with mock services? >> >> Henri. >> >> >> On 5/5/06, Rob Dennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > Can you test your pages using HtmlUnit with mock services? I have a >> > service that is drawing data from the database and I would like to >> fake >> that >> > for testing purposes, but I can't figure out how to do it. >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks for your help, >> > >> > Rob >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.4/332 - Release Date: 5/4/2006 >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.4/332 - Release Date: 5/4/2006 >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.4/332 - Release Date: 5/4/2006 >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.4/332 - Release Date: 5/4/2006 >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > James Carman, President Carman Consulting, Inc.
How to set the focus on a form ?
Hi all, I need to set the focus on a different element of a form than the default one. I've tried to find this functionnality in the validationdelegate wihout success. Any idea is welcome. -- Stéphane Decleire 05 56 57 99 20 06 63 78 69 06
Re: tapestryforums.com
Jesse, you said you're not looking for a consensus, but in case you change your mind here it goes:+1 Jesse Kuhnert wrote: Ok it looks like there's a general consensus. Any word from tapestryforums ? (I found the cc'ed email addy on the site) On 5/9/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are people really taking the time to manually post spam to the forum, or have they circumvented the "captcha" feature of tapestryforums.com? -Original Message- From: Wayland Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:12 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: tapestryforums.com The forum administrator has installed forwarding software that will send an email to our list for each post that gets posted to his forum. Problem is he has little spam protection, so people spamming his forums get their posts automatically forwarded to us lucky folk on this list. On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I dont understand: how can the forum spam the mailing list? I'm missing > something on the chain of events. > Anyway, that forum is pretty low traffic, there aren't that many people > answering questions there. > > On 5/9/06, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots > or > > > discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this > > matter > > > but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with > > the > > > proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. > > > > You definitely speak for me. > > > > -- > > regards, > > Robin > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Cumprimentos, > Rui Pacheco > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Popup on LinkSubmit
> On 5/9/06, linuja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, Henri. The code in the wiki( >> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/PopupLinkSubmit) is not full, >> can >> you show the *PopupLinkSubmit.script*, *PopupLinkSubmit.jwc* and the >> PopupDirectLink.java? > > > Sorry, I forgot them. I have PopupDirectLink too but it will make an > insanily long page on the wiki... Maybe there is a better place for these > components? > Tassel? www.tapestrycomponents.org =) Robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Popup on LinkSubmit
On 5/9/06, linuja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Henri. The code in the wiki( http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/PopupLinkSubmit) is not full, can you show the *PopupLinkSubmit.script*, *PopupLinkSubmit.jwc* and the PopupDirectLink.java? Sorry, I forgot them. I have PopupDirectLink too but it will make an insanily long page on the wiki... Maybe there is a better place for these components? Henri.
Re: JettyLauncher [was: Spindle in Eclipse 3.2]
Just update JL and grab version 1.4.1 and you are good to go with E3.2 (and thank Brian - he built it!) Geoff On 5/9/06, Gentry, Michael (Contractor) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Geoff: Will there be an update of JettyLauncher for Eclipse 3.2 sometime? I tried the 3.2 stream a few weeks back and JettyLauncher had issues (couldn't display the panels correctly and couldn't launch Jetty). This isn't a big deal for me (yet) as I use a PowerPC-based Mac and I just went back to using Eclipse 3.1.x. For Intel-based Mac users, though (such as my co-worker), it is. Eclipse 3.2.x is the first stream to support the new Intel-based Macs. Just thought I'd point that out if you were unaware of the issue. Thanks! /dev/mrg -Original Message- From: Geoff Longman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:47 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Spindle in Eclipse 3.2 ok, there is a version of Spindle for T3 that works in Eclipse 3.2 but not by online update. Well that's not true. Let me rephrase. The version of Spindle for E3.2 is available via online update is there - but it is broken! Which is why I have not announced its availability. Luckily the archived update site works fine: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/spindle/spindle.update.site.archive_3 .3.0.zip?download So why is a broken version on the online update site? I'm waiting for some of the folks at Eclipse to explain to me why this bug occurs: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=139967 And I figure they may have to try it out - for that the update site needs to be online. Geoff On 5/5/06, Ben Dotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone been successful getting Spindle to work with the new Eclipse > 3.2 release candidates? I tried it on RC1a and RC2, it downloads and > installs, but there is no sign of it after restarting Eclipse. None of > my other plugins seem to have any trouble. I don't use the majority of > its functionality anymore since we are on Tapestry 4 but I do like the > HTML editor a lot. > > > > Thanks, > > Ben > > > -- The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman Other interests: http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman Other interests: http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Slightly OT: Public Tapestry based site and service is seeking users, testers, and contributers
I guess your mouse hoovered over grayed javadoc or source icons on the way to the popup, that closes the currently open tip and displays the new one. This is the way overlib works. I guess that easy fix would be to display popups only by onmouseclick hook rather than try to use onmouseover, but I want to explain why the icon is grayed out without necessity to click, I think it is not natural thing to click on gray controls these days. In any case all suggestions are welcome. Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yea, really nice service. But those tooltips get on my nerves... they close before i hover into them... grr Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On 5/8/06, Konstantin Ignatyev wrote: > >> Let me invite you to try and use the public >> Tapestry based application I have been developing for a while and my >> company SourceLabs supports and hosts > > Wow! > > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: JettyLauncher [was: Spindle in Eclipse 3.2]
Hmm, maybe I should grab the latest 3.2 build and try it again. It was about 1 month ago when I last tried it. Maybe I can convince my co-worker to give it a shot, too. Thanks, /dev/mrg -Original Message- From: Brian K. Wallace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:32 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: JettyLauncher [was: Spindle in Eclipse 3.2] -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm not Geoff... but JettyLauncher 1.4.1 is out which supports Eclipse 3.2. If there are any issues with it working, let me know. Brian Gentry, Michael (Contractor) wrote: > Geoff: > > Will there be an update of JettyLauncher for Eclipse 3.2 sometime? I > tried the 3.2 stream a few weeks back and JettyLauncher had issues > (couldn't display the panels correctly and couldn't launch Jetty). This > isn't a big deal for me (yet) as I use a PowerPC-based Mac and I just > went back to using Eclipse 3.1.x. For Intel-based Mac users, though > (such as my co-worker), it is. Eclipse 3.2.x is the first stream to > support the new Intel-based Macs. > > Just thought I'd point that out if you were unaware of the issue. > > Thanks! > > /dev/mrg > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEYKfoaCoPKRow/gARAnWkAJ47hE3+7YsPbF0vTz83JpKjXbzg1wCdFKB9 7z7jxxm9dCmpUsyd1dXKHNY= =kWZm -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JettyLauncher [was: Spindle in Eclipse 3.2]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 And if I'm going to reply like that, I should stress what should be stressed: 1.4.1 works ONLY for Eclipse 3.2 - not previous versions. 1.3.0 is still the latest for Eclipse 3.1. Brian K. Wallace wrote: > I'm not Geoff... but JettyLauncher 1.4.1 is out which supports Eclipse > 3.2. If there are any issues with it working, let me know. > > Brian > > Gentry, Michael (Contractor) wrote: >>> Geoff: >>> >>> Will there be an update of JettyLauncher for Eclipse 3.2 sometime? I >>> tried the 3.2 stream a few weeks back and JettyLauncher had issues >>> (couldn't display the panels correctly and couldn't launch Jetty). This >>> isn't a big deal for me (yet) as I use a PowerPC-based Mac and I just >>> went back to using Eclipse 3.1.x. For Intel-based Mac users, though >>> (such as my co-worker), it is. Eclipse 3.2.x is the first stream to >>> support the new Intel-based Macs. >>> >>> Just thought I'd point that out if you were unaware of the issue. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> /dev/mrg >>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEYKihaCoPKRow/gARAq+zAJ0ZQPRLNJL0L7Ts/Ruhwx8rWXK2MACdHQFY d+DwszCM6cUkXE6kyMkm2FI= =aFSp -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JettyLauncher [was: Spindle in Eclipse 3.2]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm not Geoff... but JettyLauncher 1.4.1 is out which supports Eclipse 3.2. If there are any issues with it working, let me know. Brian Gentry, Michael (Contractor) wrote: > Geoff: > > Will there be an update of JettyLauncher for Eclipse 3.2 sometime? I > tried the 3.2 stream a few weeks back and JettyLauncher had issues > (couldn't display the panels correctly and couldn't launch Jetty). This > isn't a big deal for me (yet) as I use a PowerPC-based Mac and I just > went back to using Eclipse 3.1.x. For Intel-based Mac users, though > (such as my co-worker), it is. Eclipse 3.2.x is the first stream to > support the new Intel-based Macs. > > Just thought I'd point that out if you were unaware of the issue. > > Thanks! > > /dev/mrg > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFEYKfoaCoPKRow/gARAnWkAJ47hE3+7YsPbF0vTz83JpKjXbzg1wCdFKB9 7z7jxxm9dCmpUsyd1dXKHNY= =kWZm -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JettyLauncher [was: Spindle in Eclipse 3.2]
i'm using it as we speak in 3.2 Linux. No problems at all here... Gentry, Michael (Contractor) wrote: Geoff: Will there be an update of JettyLauncher for Eclipse 3.2 sometime? I tried the 3.2 stream a few weeks back and JettyLauncher had issues (couldn't display the panels correctly and couldn't launch Jetty). This isn't a big deal for me (yet) as I use a PowerPC-based Mac and I just went back to using Eclipse 3.1.x. For Intel-based Mac users, though (such as my co-worker), it is. Eclipse 3.2.x is the first stream to support the new Intel-based Macs. Just thought I'd point that out if you were unaware of the issue. Thanks! /dev/mrg -Original Message- From: Geoff Longman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:47 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Spindle in Eclipse 3.2 ok, there is a version of Spindle for T3 that works in Eclipse 3.2 but not by online update. Well that's not true. Let me rephrase. The version of Spindle for E3.2 is available via online update is there - but it is broken! Which is why I have not announced its availability. Luckily the archived update site works fine: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/spindle/spindle.update.site.archive_3 .3.0.zip?download So why is a broken version on the online update site? I'm waiting for some of the folks at Eclipse to explain to me why this bug occurs: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=139967 And I figure they may have to try it out - for that the update site needs to be online. Geoff On 5/5/06, Ben Dotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Has anyone been successful getting Spindle to work with the new Eclipse 3.2 release candidates? I tried it on RC1a and RC2, it downloads and installs, but there is no sign of it after restarting Eclipse. None of my other plugins seem to have any trouble. I don't use the majority of its functionality anymore since we are on Tapestry 4 but I do like the HTML editor a lot. Thanks, Ben -- The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman Other interests: http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tapestryforums.com
On 09. Mai 2006 - 10:21:45, Jesse Kuhnert wrote: | Ok it looks like there's a general consensus. | | Any word from tapestryforums ? (I found the cc'ed email addy on the site) I would say: Just do it! I've never seen something similar on any other list I was subscribed to. If the people using the forums want to reach a wider audience IMHO they should subscribe to the list. Furthermore as the mails forwarded from the forums are ugly HTML and not readable (at least in mutt which I'm using) I would say kick it ;) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JettyLauncher [was: Spindle in Eclipse 3.2]
Geoff: Will there be an update of JettyLauncher for Eclipse 3.2 sometime? I tried the 3.2 stream a few weeks back and JettyLauncher had issues (couldn't display the panels correctly and couldn't launch Jetty). This isn't a big deal for me (yet) as I use a PowerPC-based Mac and I just went back to using Eclipse 3.1.x. For Intel-based Mac users, though (such as my co-worker), it is. Eclipse 3.2.x is the first stream to support the new Intel-based Macs. Just thought I'd point that out if you were unaware of the issue. Thanks! /dev/mrg -Original Message- From: Geoff Longman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:47 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Spindle in Eclipse 3.2 ok, there is a version of Spindle for T3 that works in Eclipse 3.2 but not by online update. Well that's not true. Let me rephrase. The version of Spindle for E3.2 is available via online update is there - but it is broken! Which is why I have not announced its availability. Luckily the archived update site works fine: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/spindle/spindle.update.site.archive_3 .3.0.zip?download So why is a broken version on the online update site? I'm waiting for some of the folks at Eclipse to explain to me why this bug occurs: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=139967 And I figure they may have to try it out - for that the update site needs to be online. Geoff On 5/5/06, Ben Dotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone been successful getting Spindle to work with the new Eclipse > 3.2 release candidates? I tried it on RC1a and RC2, it downloads and > installs, but there is no sign of it after restarting Eclipse. None of > my other plugins seem to have any trouble. I don't use the majority of > its functionality anymore since we are on Tapestry 4 but I do like the > HTML editor a lot. > > > > Thanks, > > Ben > > > -- The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman Other interests: http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tapestryforums.com
Thanks for the explanation. What about if each one of us sends him an email asking to fix it? He'll get an idea of what we're going through. On 5/9/06, Wayland Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The forum administrator has installed forwarding software that will send an email to our list for each post that gets posted to his forum. Problem is he has little spam protection, so people spamming his forums get their posts automatically forwarded to us lucky folk on this list. On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I dont understand: how can the forum spam the mailing list? I'm missing > something on the chain of events. > Anyway, that forum is pretty low traffic, there aren't that many people > answering questions there. > > On 5/9/06, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots > or > > > discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this > > matter > > > but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with > > the > > > proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. > > > > You definitely speak for me. > > > > -- > > regards, > > Robin > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Cumprimentos, > Rui Pacheco > > -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco
Re: tapestryforums.com
Ok it looks like there's a general consensus. Any word from tapestryforums ? (I found the cc'ed email addy on the site) On 5/9/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are people really taking the time to manually post spam to the forum, or have they circumvented the "captcha" feature of tapestryforums.com? -Original Message- From: Wayland Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:12 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: tapestryforums.com The forum administrator has installed forwarding software that will send an email to our list for each post that gets posted to his forum. Problem is he has little spam protection, so people spamming his forums get their posts automatically forwarded to us lucky folk on this list. On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I dont understand: how can the forum spam the mailing list? I'm missing > something on the chain of events. > Anyway, that forum is pretty low traffic, there aren't that many people > answering questions there. > > On 5/9/06, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots > or > > > discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this > > matter > > > but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with > > the > > > proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. > > > > You definitely speak for me. > > > > -- > > regards, > > Robin > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Cumprimentos, > Rui Pacheco > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
RE: tapestryforums.com
Are people really taking the time to manually post spam to the forum, or have they circumvented the "captcha" feature of tapestryforums.com? -Original Message- From: Wayland Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:12 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: tapestryforums.com The forum administrator has installed forwarding software that will send an email to our list for each post that gets posted to his forum. Problem is he has little spam protection, so people spamming his forums get their posts automatically forwarded to us lucky folk on this list. On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I dont understand: how can the forum spam the mailing list? I'm missing > something on the chain of events. > Anyway, that forum is pretty low traffic, there aren't that many people > answering questions there. > > On 5/9/06, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots > or > > > discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this > > matter > > > but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with > > the > > > proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. > > > > You definitely speak for me. > > > > -- > > regards, > > Robin > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Cumprimentos, > Rui Pacheco > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tapestryforums.com
The forum administrator has installed forwarding software that will send an email to our list for each post that gets posted to his forum. Problem is he has little spam protection, so people spamming his forums get their posts automatically forwarded to us lucky folk on this list. On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I dont understand: how can the forum spam the mailing list? I'm missing something on the chain of events. Anyway, that forum is pretty low traffic, there aren't that many people answering questions there. On 5/9/06, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots or > > discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this > matter > > but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with > the > > proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. > > You definitely speak for me. > > -- > regards, > Robin > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco
Re: tapestryforums.com
+2 ;-) On 09. Mai 2006 - 09:26:36, Jesse Kuhnert wrote: | I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapestryforums.com. As we | receive a ~lot~ of spam from this service every day I'm less and less | enthusiastic about its continued operation. (at least as far as sending | emails to our users list goes) | | Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots or | discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this matter | but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with the | proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tapestryforums.com
I don't think people should have to add filters to their mail client for things like this. It's the ~only~ list I'm subscribed to that gets spam and I find it highly annoying/embarrassing as it's a project I'm part of. I'm not looking for consensus so much as a response from the tapestryforums.com people before I pursue other routes. (I'm sure any tapestry devs will speak up if they are against it.) On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I dont understand: how can the forum spam the mailing list? I'm missing something on the chain of events. Anyway, that forum is pretty low traffic, there aren't that many people answering questions there. On 5/9/06, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots or > > discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this > matter > > but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with > the > > proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. > > You definitely speak for me. > > -- > regards, > Robin > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
Re: tapestryforums.com
I dont understand: how can the forum spam the mailing list? I'm missing something on the chain of events. Anyway, that forum is pretty low traffic, there aren't that many people answering questions there. On 5/9/06, Robin Ericsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots or > discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this matter > but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with the > proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. You definitely speak for me. -- regards, Robin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Cumprimentos, Rui Pacheco
RE: tapestryforums.com
+1! -Original Message- From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 9:27 AM To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: tapestryforums.com I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapestryforums.com. As we receive a ~lot~ of spam from this service every day I'm less and less enthusiastic about its continued operation. (at least as far as sending emails to our users list goes) Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots or discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this matter but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with the proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tapestryforums.com
We went through this exact same thread like 2months ago but nothing came out of it so I created a filter to delete all incoming mail from the forums. It's been working great, totally forgot about it until you guys brought it up here. I suggest you do the same until consensus is gained to kick them off the list. Let them subscribe the normal way. On 5/9/06, Detlef Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 Stop sending mails from the forum to the list. This is really annoying. -Original Message- From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 15:27 To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: tapestryforums.com I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapestryforums.com. As we receive a ~lot~ of spam from this service every day I'm less and less enthusiastic about its continued operation. (at least as far as sending emails to our users list goes) Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots or discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this matter but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with the proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tapestryforums.com
+1 Stop sending mails from the forum to the list. This is really annoying. -Original Message- From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 15:27 To: users@tapestry.apache.org Subject: tapestryforums.com I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapestryforums.com. As we receive a ~lot~ of spam from this service every day I'm less and less enthusiastic about its continued operation. (at least as far as sending emails to our users list goes) Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots or discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this matter but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with the proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TableView add remove column at runtime?
Whenever I need to do that I simply use an ognl call in the columns binding to retrieve the list of columns that should be shown. Just as you would need a getSource method for this in the container, so do you need a getColumns method that returns a string. The string follows the same format as always. I generally use this in conjuction with a Palette or some other way to let the user decide what columns to render. -Mike On 5/9/06, John Menke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How can you add or remove a column at runtime with the tableView component? -jm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tapestryforums.com
On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots or discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this matter but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with the proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. You definitely speak for me. -- regards, Robin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tapestryforums.com
I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapestryforums.com. As we receive a ~lot~ of spam from this service every day I'm less and less enthusiastic about its continued operation. (at least as far as sending emails to our users list goes) Please find a way to fix your user registration to disallow spam bots or discontinue your service altogether. I speak only for myself in this matter but if not stopped by the other devs have no problem taking it up with the proper entities at the ASF to get it stopped. -- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
RE: Concatenating strings in OGNL
Hehe, never mind; just saw you had a response -- still battling my junk e-mail filters with the new list-address. Jim -Original Message- From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 2:16 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Concatenating strings in OGNL Hi, how can I concatenate strings using OGNL? What I would like to do is something like this: The resulting title should look like this: "My Application - Admin Section". Is there a way to do this in OGNL or do I need to add a Java function to the page/component? Thanks, MARK - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Concatenating strings in OGNL
Hi Mark, What you have should be working fine -- are you getting an error? Go ahead and try it if you haven't already. Jim -Original Message- From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 2:16 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Concatenating strings in OGNL Hi, how can I concatenate strings using OGNL? What I would like to do is something like this: The resulting title should look like this: "My Application - Admin Section". Is there a way to do this in OGNL or do I need to add a Java function to the page/component? Thanks, MARK - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TableView add remove column at runtime?
How can you add or remove a column at runtime with the tableView component? -jm
Re: Table componente - Localized description ...
This is don't working here.. This is my page literal:nome: family.page.list.table.name:nome but tapestry print family.page.list.table.name not Name ... The others messages it print On 5/8/06, Martin Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just omit the "message:" part, like this: name:page.name:name The Table will automatically look for the message key in your page's message catalog. Angelo Luis wrote: > I want to make the description of my Table component localized... > > How do i do that??? > > > i try to make that way, but dont work -> name:message:page.name:name > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Popup on LinkSubmit
Hi, Henri. The code in the wiki( http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/PopupLinkSubmit) is not full, can you show the *PopupLinkSubmit.script*, *PopupLinkSubmit.jwc* and the PopupDirectLink.java? Thanks, linuja 2006/5/5, Henri Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 5/3/06, Wes Bramhall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, I just started working on something very similar. I want to submit > a form using a LinkSubmit and render the response to that submission in > a new window. After looking at it myself for a little bit, I got the > window to pop up and the response to render in the parent, so not quite > what I had in mind. Then I saw this thread. You have a component written > that does this Henri? Yes I did, I just posted my code in the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/PopupLinkSubmit Henri.
Re: Slightly OT: Public Tapestry based site and service is seeking users, testers, and contributers
Yea, really nice service. But those tooltips get on my nerves... they close before i hover into them... grr Massimo Lusetti wrote: On 5/8/06, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Let me invite you to try and use the public Tapestry based application I have been developing for a while and my company SourceLabs supports and hosts Wow! -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Slightly OT: Public Tapestry based site and service is seeking users, testers, and contributers
On 5/8/06, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Let me invite you to try and use the public Tapestry based application I have been developing for a while and my company SourceLabs supports and hosts Wow! -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Concatenating strings in OGNL
BTW, there's a little known feature of tacos, the template binding.
With it, you can do:
title="template:${appTitle} - ${sectionTitle}"
Mark wrote:
Weird, now it works.
I got some crazy error which I can not remember any more just now. I
had already taken it out and just tried this one:
stylesheet="asset:mainCss">
Then I got your email and took the { and } off again, but I can not
reproduce the problem I had earlier... Maybe something didn't
reload/propagade properly.
Oh well... better this way than the other way around.
Thank you for the response.
MARK
Schulte Marcus wrote:
That should work just fine - which error do you get?
-Original Message-
From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:16 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Concatenating strings in OGNL
Hi,
how can I concatenate strings using OGNL?
What I would like to do is something like this:
stylesheet="asset:mainCss">
The resulting title should look like this: "My Application -
Admin Section".
Is there a way to do this in OGNL or do I need to add a Java
function to
the page/component?
Thanks,
MARK
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
