problem with mvn jetty:run from T5 tutorial

2007-03-24 Thread Steve Maring

I'm also have a problem trying to run mvn jetty:run.  I get:

: Unable to download the artifact from any repository

 org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugins:pom:8

from the specified remote repositories:
 central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
 codehaus.snapshots (http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org),
 codehaus (http://repository.codehaus.org),
 apache.snapshots (http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/),
 mortbay-repo (http://www.mortbay.org/maven2/snapshot),
 howardlewisship.com (http://howardlewisship.com/repository)

Am I wrong in my thinking that it is in the cetral repo right here?
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-plugins/8/

-Steve Maring

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



T5 - Cancelling a form

2007-03-24 Thread Bogdan Calmac

What is the recommended way to handle a Cancel button on a form? The
expected behaviour would be to clear the internal state, bypass
validation and move to a different page. I tried:

 @OnEvent(component=Cancel)
 String onCancel()
 {
   surveySession.setSurvey(null);
   return Start;
 }


where Cancel is the id of the submit component but Tapestry
complains that this method cannot return a String:

Event 'selected' from org.byteberry.survey.pages.SurveyDetail:cancel
received an event handler method return value of Start from
org.byteberry.survey.pages.SurveyDetail.onCancel() (at
SurveyDetail.java:46). This type of event does not support return
values from event handler methods.


On the other hand, if I try do do it on the form events I don't know
which button was pressed and I cannot bypass validation.

Is there a straightforward way to do it?

Thanks,

Bogdan Calmac.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: T5 - Cancelling a form

2007-03-24 Thread Pablo Ruggia

There was a discussion last week on the same topic. Howard said that the
best way was to keep a flag like cancelSelected and turn it on on the
selected event. Then in the form submit event look to it and do what it
needs to do.
I think that it is very incovenient, it's a common use case having a lot of
buttons, there should be a way to make events from submits button act like
listeners in tap4, so they are called at last, when all the form has been
processed, so it can redirect to another page.

On 3/24/07, Bogdan Calmac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


What is the recommended way to handle a Cancel button on a form? The
expected behaviour would be to clear the internal state, bypass
validation and move to a different page. I tried:

  @OnEvent(component=Cancel)
  String onCancel()
  {
surveySession.setSurvey(null);
return Start;
  }


where Cancel is the id of the submit component but Tapestry
complains that this method cannot return a String:

Event 'selected' from org.byteberry.survey.pages.SurveyDetail:cancel
received an event handler method return value of Start from
org.byteberry.survey.pages.SurveyDetail.onCancel() (at
SurveyDetail.java:46). This type of event does not support return
values from event handler methods.


On the other hand, if I try do do it on the form events I don't know
which button was pressed and I cannot bypass validation.

Is there a straightforward way to do it?

Thanks,

Bogdan Calmac.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: problem with mvn jetty:run from T5 tutorial

2007-03-24 Thread Steve Maring
Perhaps I am wrong in my thinking, the jar itself is not in the 
directory on the repo.  Anybody know of a repo that WOULD have it?


Thanks,
Steve Maring

Steve Maring wrote:


I'm also have a problem trying to run mvn jetty:run.  I get:

: Unable to download the artifact from any repository

 org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugins:pom:8

from the specified remote repositories:
 central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
 codehaus.snapshots (http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org),
 codehaus (http://repository.codehaus.org),
 apache.snapshots 
(http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/),

 mortbay-repo (http://www.mortbay.org/maven2/snapshot),
 howardlewisship.com (http://howardlewisship.com/repository)

Am I wrong in my thinking that it is in the cetral repo right here?
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-plugins/8/

-Steve Maring

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: T5 - Cancelling a form

2007-03-24 Thread Stephan Schwab



Pablo Ruggia wrote:
 
 There was a discussion last week on the same topic. Howard said that the
 best way was to keep a flag like cancelSelected and turn it on on the
 selected event. Then in the form submit event look to it and do what
 it
 needs to do.
 I think that it is very incovenient, it's a common use case having a lot
 of
 buttons, there should be a way to make events from submits button act like
 listeners in tap4, so they are called at last, when all the form has been
 processed, so it can redirect to another page.

In my opinion forms should be as simple as possible. From a UI design
perspective that helps to avoid user confusion. So either you leave a form
to save the input or you want to abandon it. Leads to only two submit
buttons.

If you need additional buttons to do additional processing while you are in
the form, you can always be notified via the OnSelect... callbacks, but you
should stay in the form and not leave it.

Stephan
--
http://www.stephan-schwab.com

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/T5---Cancelling-a-form-tf3458631.html#a9651520
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problem with new operator in ognl 2.7

2007-03-24 Thread Shing Hing Man

I am using the latest Tap 4.1.2 snapshot.
The following ognl expression used to worked with ognl
2.6.

  binding name=source value=ognl:new
int[nToDefaultBean.basketSize]/

But I have the following exception when I used ognl
2.7.
 Unable to parse OGNL expression 'new
int[nToDefaultBean.basketSize]': Error compiling
expression on object
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/creditDer/NToDefault] with
expression node new int[] nToDefaultBean.basketSize
getter body: { return ($w) (new
int[.getNToDefaultBean().getBasketSize()]);} setter
body: null

Has anyone enountered the same problem ?

Shing




Home page :
  http://uk.geocities.com/matmsh/index.html



___ 
Inbox full of unwanted email? Get leading protection and 1GB storage with All 
New Yahoo! Mail. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Empty Double TextField causes NPE

2007-03-24 Thread Bogdan Calmac

I have a TextField on a Form which is bound to a Double property. This
field is not required so it is OK for the user to leave it empty. But
when Tapestry updates the property, a NullPointerException is thrown:

Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Coercion of null to type
java.lang.Double (via null -- String, String -- Double) failed:
java.lang.NullPointerException
  at 
org.apache.tapestry.ioc.internal.services.TypeCoercerImpl.coerce(TypeCoercerImpl.java:154)
  at $TypeCoercer_11183ff0378.coerce($TypeCoercer_11183ff0378.java)
  at 
org.apache.tapestry.internal.structure.InternalComponentResourcesImpl.writeParameter(InternalComponentResourcesImpl.java:217)


Thanks,


Bogdan Calmac.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: T5 Action link

2007-03-24 Thread Howard Lewis Ship

I've never thought of this combination; I'm honestly not sure what the
web browser does in this situation. Clarification there would be a
good idea before guessing what Tapestry should do.

On 3/22/07, Anjana Gopinath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

If i add an action link to a plain html button, it looks like the
event method is getting called twice.  was wondering whether this is
a bug or we are not supposed to put an actionlink around a button?

a t:type=actionlink t:id=select1input type=button
value=Add//a

@OnEvent(value = action,component=select1)
 void  addApps(){
System.out.println(---here );

 }


Thanks
Anjana Gopinath
True North Technology
11465 John's Creek Parkway, Suite 300
Duluth, GA 30079
[EMAIL PROTECTED]









--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
TWD Consulting, Inc.
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
Creator, Apache HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: problem with mvn jetty:run from T5 tutorial

2007-03-24 Thread Howard Lewis Ship

This issue has been driving me crazy, right when I've started with a
new client and don't have spare cycles to look into it.

I suspect there's an alpha version of some critical Maven plugin that
Tapestry is picking up by mistake.  The right solution is probably to
go find the offending plugin and nail down the version to something
stable, rather than latest snapshot.

On 3/24/07, Steve Maring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Perhaps I am wrong in my thinking, the jar itself is not in the
directory on the repo.  Anybody know of a repo that WOULD have it?

Thanks,
Steve Maring

Steve Maring wrote:

 I'm also have a problem trying to run mvn jetty:run.  I get:

 : Unable to download the artifact from any repository

  org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugins:pom:8

 from the specified remote repositories:
  central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
  codehaus.snapshots (http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org),
  codehaus (http://repository.codehaus.org),
  apache.snapshots
 (http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/),
  mortbay-repo (http://www.mortbay.org/maven2/snapshot),
  howardlewisship.com (http://howardlewisship.com/repository)

 Am I wrong in my thinking that it is in the cetral repo right here?
 http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-plugins/8/

 -Steve Maring

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
TWD Consulting, Inc.
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
Creator, Apache HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: T5 - Cancelling a form

2007-03-24 Thread Howard Lewis Ship

How about a:actionlink t:id=cancelcancel/a ?

Why should it be necessary to do a form submission, just to discard
all the data in the form?

If you want, you can use CSS to dress up the link to look like a form
submit button.

I think having this cancel feature in T4 was a mistake that caused
more problems than it solved.

On 3/24/07, Stephan Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




Pablo Ruggia wrote:

 There was a discussion last week on the same topic. Howard said that the
 best way was to keep a flag like cancelSelected and turn it on on the
 selected event. Then in the form submit event look to it and do what
 it
 needs to do.
 I think that it is very incovenient, it's a common use case having a lot
 of
 buttons, there should be a way to make events from submits button act like
 listeners in tap4, so they are called at last, when all the form has been
 processed, so it can redirect to another page.

In my opinion forms should be as simple as possible. From a UI design
perspective that helps to avoid user confusion. So either you leave a form
to save the input or you want to abandon it. Leads to only two submit
buttons.

If you need additional buttons to do additional processing while you are in
the form, you can always be notified via the OnSelect... callbacks, but you
should stay in the form and not leave it.

Stephan
--
http://www.stephan-schwab.com

--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/T5---Cancelling-a-form-tf3458631.html#a9651520
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
TWD Consulting, Inc.
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
Creator, Apache HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: T5: Customizing generation of client id from component id

2007-03-24 Thread Howard Lewis Ship

Have you thought about using a specialized class value for links 
etc. that are going to be involved in the test suite, and then
selecting by class instead of id?

Just an idea ...

On 3/23/07, Doug Hauge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Thanks for the response. We are in the process of migrating our
application to Tapestry, and in the process making it more easily
customizable and testable. The solution we are looking for seems
to be a reasonable way to satisfy the following constraints:

1) Within a component, identifiers given to sub-components should
be as simple as possible while being descriptive. For most components,
little thought should be required about what other components might
appear in the page.

2) Within a page, components should be able to be rearranged, added,
and removed without affecting the identifier given to the associated
element(s) in the rendered HTML. Such an immutable identifier is
useful for Selenium tests that are valid across such page modifications.

3) In keeping with the DRY principle, we would like to avoid requiring
a mixin or other boilerplate code to be included in all our components
in order to construct unique identifiers.

The problem is that (1) can easily lead to a case where multiple
components specify the same component id for their children, because
the component writer has no knowledge of what other components may
be placed in the page, and in order to keep the component id simple
we don't want to require the component writer to always apply a
prefix to increase the likelihood of uniqueness. All that we want to
require of the component writer is that within the component, all the
identifiers are unique. There might also be cases where the same
component is included multiple times within a page, either directly
or indirectly.

Note that an ideal solution for us would also allow us to similarly
transform id attributes on HTML elements in the template. If we can't,
we either have to avoid specifying identifiers on raw HTML elements
or to make sure that all components that may ever be placed
on a page choose identifiers that are unique among those components.

We have a temporary solution now that uses a mixin that traverses the
DOM and adjusts identifiers in its 'afterRender' method, but this
violates (3) and is a bit of a kludge.

Thanks,
Doug

 -Original Message-
 From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 3:56 PM
 To: Tapestry users
 Subject: Re: T5: Customizing generation of client id from component id

 I'm afraid that's a use case that wasn't foremost in my mind when
 coding this stuff up for T5.  Still, if you explicitly set component
 ids, it's highly unlikely that they'll change dramatically from one
 build to the next ... could you elaborate on the situation that drove
 you towards this kind of solution?

 On 3/23/07, Doug Hauge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Is there a way to customize the generation of a unique client id
from a
  component id? We would like to generate the unique id in such a way
that
  it would not change across most modifications to a page, mainly so
  Selenium tests can be written that will work across page redesign.
The
  current method of appending a suffix to a component id does not seem
to
  allow this, so we would like to be able to generate a unique id by
  prepending the component ids of ancestral components. We could
  potentially implement our own PageRenderSupport service, but the
  'allocateClientId' method only takes a string parameter, so we don't
  have the context we would need (in particular, the
ComponentResources of
  the component for which we are generating the id).
 
 
 
  Thanks,
 
  Doug
 
 
 
 
 
 


 --
 Howard M. Lewis Ship
 TWD Consulting, Inc.
 Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
 Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
 Creator, Apache HiveMind

 Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
 and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
TWD Consulting, Inc.
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
Creator, Apache HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: T5 - Cancelling a form

2007-03-24 Thread Stephan Schwab


Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
 
 How about a:actionlink t:id=cancelcancel  ?
 
 Why should it be necessary to do a form submission, just to discard
 all the data in the form?
 
 If you want, you can use CSS to dress up the link to look like a form
 submit button.

Right. Actually that's pretty smart and more in compliance with the original
idea of the reset in pure HTML.

Stephan
--
http://www.stephan-schwab.com

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/T5---Cancelling-a-form-tf3458631.html#a9652893
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: T5 - Cancelling a form

2007-03-24 Thread Bogdan Calmac

Thanks Howard,

The CSS hack would problably work but I'd rather consider other
options. I could for instance use some image buttons which have the
same look and feel for both Submit and Cancel. Does tapestry
provide the equivalent of input type=image for form submission?


Bogdan.

On 3/24/07, Stephan Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Howard Lewis Ship wrote:

 How about a:actionlink t:id=cancelcancel  ?

 Why should it be necessary to do a form submission, just to discard
 all the data in the form?

 If you want, you can use CSS to dress up the link to look like a form
 submit button.

Right. Actually that's pretty smart and more in compliance with the original
idea of the reset in pure HTML.

Stephan
--
http://www.stephan-schwab.com

--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/T5---Cancelling-a-form-tf3458631.html#a9652893
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: T5: No /option tag rendered when using enum

2007-03-24 Thread Howard Lewis Ship

This is correct behavior for rendering HTML (as opposed to XHTML).
Unlike T4, T5 knows the difference.  HTML is a SGML language where
open tags are not necessarly balanced with close tags.

What's coming is the ability for Tapestry to render XML/XHTML
correctly and choose the correct strategy (HTML vs. XML/XHTML)
automatically.

On 3/22/07, Erik Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

when using the Select component with an Enum the options within the select tag wont 
render the /option tag.

Example:

The enum

public enum TestEnum {
ONE,TWO,THREE;
}

will render the select

select id=selected name=selected
option value=ONEOne
option value=TWOTwo
option selected=selected value=THREEThree
/select

Is this a known bug? (I'm not familiar with JIRA so I dont know how to post 
this or if it has been noticed)

regards
-Erik


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
TWD Consulting, Inc.
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
Creator, Apache HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Re: Session

2007-03-24 Thread Jesse Kuhnert

Don't we already? ;)

http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/tapestry-contrib/componentreference/timeout.html

On 3/24/07, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

That's useful enough that someone should add a JIRA issue suggesting
we supply that as a standard component.

On 3/22/07, Kristian Marinkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 i think a better strategy is to reduce the sesion-timeout in the
 web.xml to lets say 2mins and to implement a javascript function
 that issues periodic keep-alive requests every 1.5mins or so.
 thus preventing the session from expiring...

 and when someone closes his browser the session will not
 stay in memory for too long :)

 g,
 kris




 Tim Sawyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 22.03.2007 11:10
 Bitte antworten an
 Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org


 An
 users@tapestry.apache.org
 Kopie
 James Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Thema
 Re: Session






 I believe the timeout for this is configured through web.xml

 session-config
   session-timeout30/session-timeout !-- minutes --
 /session-config

 Tim.

 On Tuesday 20 March 2007 17:16, James Sherwood wrote:
  Hello,
 
  We have an admin side with a user login etc.
 
  The problem is, the session times out after soo many minutes(we run
 under
  tomcat) of being idle and they user has to log back in.
 
  Is there any way to make this indefinate and if so, is there any impact
 on
  resources etc?
 
  Thanks,
  James
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
TWD Consulting, Inc.
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
Creator, Apache HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: required fields formatting BEFORE validation

2007-03-24 Thread Jesse Kuhnert

Yep.

On 3/23/07, Martino Piccinato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Ok,

I reply to myself hoping this would be of any help for somebody else.
Is as simple as to make your own IValidationDelegate and override (exemple)
this method:

public void writeAttributes(IMarkupWriter writer, IRequestCycle cycle,
IFormComponent component, IValidator validator) {
// If the form component represents a required field
// it adds the required field class
super.writeAttributes(writer, cycle,component,  validator);
if (component.isRequired()) {
writer.appendAttribute(class, requiredField);
}
}

obviously then you have to use your IValidationDelegate in your
pages/components.



On 3/23/07, Martino Piccinato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

 is there a standard way to define common formatting for required fields
 BEFORE client/server side validation happens?
 It's always a good thing for users to know compulsory fields before
 starting data insertion.

 I know the issue is easy to solve just by adding few things but it would
 be good to have this in componentes that accept required validator.

 Martino





--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem with new operator in ognl 2.7

2007-03-24 Thread Jesse Kuhnert

It probably works now.

On 3/24/07, Shing Hing Man [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I am using the latest Tap 4.1.2 snapshot.
The following ognl expression used to worked with ognl
2.6.

  binding name=source value=ognl:new
int[nToDefaultBean.basketSize]/

But I have the following exception when I used ognl
2.7.
 Unable to parse OGNL expression 'new
int[nToDefaultBean.basketSize]': Error compiling
expression on object
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/creditDer/NToDefault] with
expression node new int[] nToDefaultBean.basketSize
getter body: { return ($w) (new
int[.getNToDefaultBean().getBasketSize()]);} setter
body: null

Has anyone enountered the same problem ?

Shing




Home page :
  http://uk.geocities.com/matmsh/index.html



___
Inbox full of unwanted email? Get leading protection and 1GB storage with All 
New Yahoo! Mail. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Tapestry 4.1.1 / dojo broken on IE? - IE freezing!

2007-03-24 Thread Jesse Kuhnert

Sounds un-fun.

If you capture a sample request via fiddler / wireshark (plugins / dev
utilities for ie) I can at least tell you what is going wrong. I'm
less sure I can tell you how to fix it. I'm semi familiar with squid -
but this doesn't sound like the same kind of situation.

On 3/23/07, Maximilian Wei?bock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Andreas,

sadly I have to say that your page still has errors, the very fierst
error I get if I clean ally my
browser chache and than go to http://www.fsbutiken.se/ is:

Could not load 'tapestry.form'; last tried '__package__.is'

BUT: We have a caching proxy to connect to the internet!

If I disable the caching proxy, your site works without JavaScript
errors!
This at least gives some hints where the problem is.

Sadly we are no IE experts, has anyone a hint what we can do to make
Tapestry 4.1.1 / dojo / IE work with caching? Cause we can not control
if customers
have a chahing proxy or not...

Thanks, Max





--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]