Re: AjaxFormLoop Exception on 5.1.0.2 upgrade
Alright this is the simplest setup I could do. This is way simpler than even
the example thats in the nightly docs. I am getting the same error. If
someone could please help me out as to what I am missing here I would be
eternally grateful. This is the complete source, there is no other source
involved in this except what I am pasting.
Tml:
html xmlns:t=http://tapestry.apache.org/schema/tapestry_5_0_0.xsd;
t:form
t:ajaxformloop source=strings value=currentString
t:textfield t:id=thefield value=currentString/
t:removeRowLinkBye!/t:removeRowLink
/t:ajaxformloop
/t:form
/html
Page:
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import org.apache.tapestry5.annotations.Component;
import org.apache.tapestry5.annotations.Property;
import org.apache.tapestry5.corelib.components.TextField;
public class Test {
@Property
private ListString strings;
@Property
private String currentString;
@Component
private TextField theField;
void onActivate() {
strings = new ArrayListString();
strings.add(Hello);
strings.add(Heres a tester);
}
String onAddRow() {
return Added!;
}
void onRemoveRow(String toRemove) {
strings.remove(toRemove);
}
}
Sorry to be posting so much, I've just been pulling out my hair on this and
(as I'm sure you all understand) we have a very tight deadline to meet.
Thank you all again for all the help!
Zack
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFormLoop-Exception-on-5.1.0.2-upgrade-tp23175801p23291616.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: AjaxFormLoop Exception on 5.1.0.2 upgrade
Hi, Zack
I just tried your example, but nothing wrong. Mine is 5.1.0.3.
DH
- Original Message -
From: zack1403 zack.mann...@gmail.com
To: users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: AjaxFormLoop Exception on 5.1.0.2 upgrade
Alright this is the simplest setup I could do. This is way simpler than even
the example thats in the nightly docs. I am getting the same error. If
someone could please help me out as to what I am missing here I would be
eternally grateful. This is the complete source, there is no other source
involved in this except what I am pasting.
Tml:
html xmlns:t=http://tapestry.apache.org/schema/tapestry_5_0_0.xsd;
t:form
t:ajaxformloop source=strings value=currentString
t:textfield t:id=thefield value=currentString/
t:removeRowLinkBye!/t:removeRowLink
/t:ajaxformloop
/t:form
/html
Page:
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import org.apache.tapestry5.annotations.Component;
import org.apache.tapestry5.annotations.Property;
import org.apache.tapestry5.corelib.components.TextField;
public class Test {
@Property
private ListString strings;
@Property
private String currentString;
@Component
private TextField theField;
void onActivate() {
strings = new ArrayListString();
strings.add(Hello);
strings.add(Heres a tester);
}
String onAddRow() {
return Added!;
}
void onRemoveRow(String toRemove) {
strings.remove(toRemove);
}
}
Sorry to be posting so much, I've just been pulling out my hair on this and
(as I'm sure you all understand) we have a very tight deadline to meet.
Thank you all again for all the help!
Zack
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFormLoop-Exception-on-5.1.0.2-upgrade-tp23175801p23291616.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: How to download 5.1 compatible Chenille kit?
I'm using the Editor component too, but it stopped working with
Tapestry 5.1.0.4.
I get a javascript error as soon as the component tries to render itself:
Error: missing ; before statement
Source File: http://localhost:8080/classys/assets/tapestry/5.1.0.4/tapestry.js
Line: 301, Column: 4
Source Code:
var editor_editor-120f10dbe41 = new FCKeditor('editor-120f10dbe41');
Well, i'm off to build 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT and see if it works with 5.1.0.4.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
thiag...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm late in this discussion, but I'm using ChenilleKit (just the Editor
component already) 1.0 with Tapestry 5.1.0.3 and it works without problems.
I just added an exclusion for Tapestry in the ChenilleKit Maven Dependency.
By the way, why Chenillekit has this name? Just curious. :)
Em Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:05:26 -0300, Geoff Callender
geoff.callender.jumpst...@gmail.com escreveu:
Please send them to me too!
Geoff
http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au
On 21/04/2009, at 3:43 AM, Inge Solvoll wrote:
Ok, I guess I'll just sit down and wait for the official 5.1 release for
all
the libraries I need :)
Anyway, if anyone feels like sending me their T5.1-compatible
chenillekit-core.jar and chenillekit-tapestry.jar in a zip file, I would
be
very happy. I know, lazy guy trying to get other people to do his work.
Just
ignore me :)
Inge
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Massimo Lusetti
mluse...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Another stupid question: How do I download the latest (5.1 compatible)
snapshot build of chenillekit? I'm not using maven. I managed to track
down
the following, but I guess it is not the newest available:
http://www.chenillekit.org/mvnrepo/snapshot/org/chenillekit/chenillekit-tapestry/1.0.1-SNAPSHOT/
This is for Tapestry 5.0 branch, for the 5.1 (current trunk) you have
to go with the Chenillekit Trunk which is 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
I looked around at tapestry.formos.com, but couldn't find anything.
You're right. The whole stuff is at Tapestry360 (tapesty.formos.com)
but we did not manage to have the migration complete, yet.
You have to download and build your own. Sorry.
Regards
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
Consultor, desenvolvedor e instrutor em Java
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: How to download 5.1 compatible Chenille kit?
I get a javascript error as soon as the component tries to render itself
Strange I don't get that?
- Original Message -
From: Hugo Palma hugo.m.pa...@gmail.com
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 April, 2009 11:47:07 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucharest,
Istanbul
Subject: Re: How to download 5.1 compatible Chenille kit?
I'm using the Editor component too, but it stopped working with
Tapestry 5.1.0.4.
I get a javascript error as soon as the component tries to render itself:
Error: missing ; before statement
Source File: http://localhost:8080/classys/assets/tapestry/5.1.0.4/tapestry.js
Line: 301, Column: 4
Source Code:
var editor_editor-120f10dbe41 = new FCKeditor('editor-120f10dbe41');
Well, i'm off to build 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT and see if it works with 5.1.0.4.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
thiag...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm late in this discussion, but I'm using ChenilleKit (just the Editor
component already) 1.0 with Tapestry 5.1.0.3 and it works without problems.
I just added an exclusion for Tapestry in the ChenilleKit Maven Dependency.
By the way, why Chenillekit has this name? Just curious. :)
Em Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:05:26 -0300, Geoff Callender
geoff.callender.jumpst...@gmail.com escreveu:
Please send them to me too!
Geoff
http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au
On 21/04/2009, at 3:43 AM, Inge Solvoll wrote:
Ok, I guess I'll just sit down and wait for the official 5.1 release for
all
the libraries I need :)
Anyway, if anyone feels like sending me their T5.1-compatible
chenillekit-core.jar and chenillekit-tapestry.jar in a zip file, I would
be
very happy. I know, lazy guy trying to get other people to do his work.
Just
ignore me :)
Inge
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Massimo Lusetti
mluse...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Another stupid question: How do I download the latest (5.1 compatible)
snapshot build of chenillekit? I'm not using maven. I managed to track
down
the following, but I guess it is not the newest available:
http://www.chenillekit.org/mvnrepo/snapshot/org/chenillekit/chenillekit-tapestry/1.0.1-SNAPSHOT/
This is for Tapestry 5.0 branch, for the 5.1 (current trunk) you have
to go with the Chenillekit Trunk which is 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
I looked around at tapestry.formos.com, but couldn't find anything.
You're right. The whole stuff is at Tapestry360 (tapesty.formos.com)
but we did not manage to have the migration complete, yet.
You have to download and build your own. Sorry.
Regards
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
Consultor, desenvolvedor e instrutor em Java
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: How to download 5.1 compatible Chenille kit?
This only happens with the editor component. Are you using the editor
component with 5.1.0.4 and getting no errors ?
I've just tried using the latest 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT from Chenille kit but
i get the same error.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Peter Stavrinides
p.stavrini...@albourne.com wrote:
I get a javascript error as soon as the component tries to render itself
Strange I don't get that?
- Original Message -
From: Hugo Palma hugo.m.pa...@gmail.com
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 April, 2009 11:47:07 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
Bucharest, Istanbul
Subject: Re: How to download 5.1 compatible Chenille kit?
I'm using the Editor component too, but it stopped working with
Tapestry 5.1.0.4.
I get a javascript error as soon as the component tries to render itself:
Error: missing ; before statement
Source File: http://localhost:8080/classys/assets/tapestry/5.1.0.4/tapestry.js
Line: 301, Column: 4
Source Code:
var editor_editor-120f10dbe41 = new FCKeditor('editor-120f10dbe41');
Well, i'm off to build 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT and see if it works with 5.1.0.4.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
thiag...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm late in this discussion, but I'm using ChenilleKit (just the Editor
component already) 1.0 with Tapestry 5.1.0.3 and it works without problems.
I just added an exclusion for Tapestry in the ChenilleKit Maven Dependency.
By the way, why Chenillekit has this name? Just curious. :)
Em Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:05:26 -0300, Geoff Callender
geoff.callender.jumpst...@gmail.com escreveu:
Please send them to me too!
Geoff
http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au
On 21/04/2009, at 3:43 AM, Inge Solvoll wrote:
Ok, I guess I'll just sit down and wait for the official 5.1 release for
all
the libraries I need :)
Anyway, if anyone feels like sending me their T5.1-compatible
chenillekit-core.jar and chenillekit-tapestry.jar in a zip file, I would
be
very happy. I know, lazy guy trying to get other people to do his work.
Just
ignore me :)
Inge
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Massimo Lusetti
mluse...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Another stupid question: How do I download the latest (5.1 compatible)
snapshot build of chenillekit? I'm not using maven. I managed to track
down
the following, but I guess it is not the newest available:
http://www.chenillekit.org/mvnrepo/snapshot/org/chenillekit/chenillekit-tapestry/1.0.1-SNAPSHOT/
This is for Tapestry 5.0 branch, for the 5.1 (current trunk) you have
to go with the Chenillekit Trunk which is 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
I looked around at tapestry.formos.com, but couldn't find anything.
You're right. The whole stuff is at Tapestry360 (tapesty.formos.com)
but we did not manage to have the migration complete, yet.
You have to download and build your own. Sorry.
Regards
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
Consultor, desenvolvedor e instrutor em Java
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: How to download 5.1 compatible Chenille kit?
I am using Tapestry 5.1.0.4 with ChenilleKit 1.0.0 and using the editor in a
few places, with no error?
Peter
--
If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender,
delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or
redistribute it. Please visit http://www.albourne.com/email.html for important
additional terms relating to this e-mail.
- Original Message -
From: Hugo Palma hugo.m.pa...@gmail.com
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 April, 2009 11:58:28 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucharest,
Istanbul
Subject: Re: How to download 5.1 compatible Chenille kit?
This only happens with the editor component. Are you using the editor
component with 5.1.0.4 and getting no errors ?
I've just tried using the latest 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT from Chenille kit but
i get the same error.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Peter Stavrinides
p.stavrini...@albourne.com wrote:
I get a javascript error as soon as the component tries to render itself
Strange I don't get that?
- Original Message -
From: Hugo Palma hugo.m.pa...@gmail.com
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 April, 2009 11:47:07 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
Bucharest, Istanbul
Subject: Re: How to download 5.1 compatible Chenille kit?
I'm using the Editor component too, but it stopped working with
Tapestry 5.1.0.4.
I get a javascript error as soon as the component tries to render itself:
Error: missing ; before statement
Source File: http://localhost:8080/classys/assets/tapestry/5.1.0.4/tapestry.js
Line: 301, Column: 4
Source Code:
var editor_editor-120f10dbe41 = new FCKeditor('editor-120f10dbe41');
Well, i'm off to build 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT and see if it works with 5.1.0.4.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
thiag...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm late in this discussion, but I'm using ChenilleKit (just the Editor
component already) 1.0 with Tapestry 5.1.0.3 and it works without problems.
I just added an exclusion for Tapestry in the ChenilleKit Maven Dependency.
By the way, why Chenillekit has this name? Just curious. :)
Em Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:05:26 -0300, Geoff Callender
geoff.callender.jumpst...@gmail.com escreveu:
Please send them to me too!
Geoff
http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au
On 21/04/2009, at 3:43 AM, Inge Solvoll wrote:
Ok, I guess I'll just sit down and wait for the official 5.1 release for
all
the libraries I need :)
Anyway, if anyone feels like sending me their T5.1-compatible
chenillekit-core.jar and chenillekit-tapestry.jar in a zip file, I would
be
very happy. I know, lazy guy trying to get other people to do his work.
Just
ignore me :)
Inge
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Massimo Lusetti
mluse...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Another stupid question: How do I download the latest (5.1 compatible)
snapshot build of chenillekit? I'm not using maven. I managed to track
down
the following, but I guess it is not the newest available:
http://www.chenillekit.org/mvnrepo/snapshot/org/chenillekit/chenillekit-tapestry/1.0.1-SNAPSHOT/
This is for Tapestry 5.0 branch, for the 5.1 (current trunk) you have
to go with the Chenillekit Trunk which is 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
I looked around at tapestry.formos.com, but couldn't find anything.
You're right. The whole stuff is at Tapestry360 (tapesty.formos.com)
but we did not manage to have the migration complete, yet.
You have to download and build your own. Sorry.
Regards
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
Consultor, desenvolvedor e instrutor em Java
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: How to download 5.1 compatible Chenille kit?
I've isolated the problem to using the editor inside the window component.
If i place the editor on a normal component or page it works fine.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Peter Stavrinides
p.stavrini...@albourne.com wrote:
I am using Tapestry 5.1.0.4 with ChenilleKit 1.0.0 and using the editor in a
few places, with no error?
Peter
--
If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the
sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or
redistribute it. Please visit http://www.albourne.com/email.html for
important additional terms relating to this e-mail.
- Original Message -
From: Hugo Palma hugo.m.pa...@gmail.com
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 April, 2009 11:58:28 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
Bucharest, Istanbul
Subject: Re: How to download 5.1 compatible Chenille kit?
This only happens with the editor component. Are you using the editor
component with 5.1.0.4 and getting no errors ?
I've just tried using the latest 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT from Chenille kit but
i get the same error.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Peter Stavrinides
p.stavrini...@albourne.com wrote:
I get a javascript error as soon as the component tries to render itself
Strange I don't get that?
- Original Message -
From: Hugo Palma hugo.m.pa...@gmail.com
To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 April, 2009 11:47:07 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
Bucharest, Istanbul
Subject: Re: How to download 5.1 compatible Chenille kit?
I'm using the Editor component too, but it stopped working with
Tapestry 5.1.0.4.
I get a javascript error as soon as the component tries to render itself:
Error: missing ; before statement
Source File:
http://localhost:8080/classys/assets/tapestry/5.1.0.4/tapestry.js
Line: 301, Column: 4
Source Code:
var editor_editor-120f10dbe41 = new FCKeditor('editor-120f10dbe41');
Well, i'm off to build 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT and see if it works with 5.1.0.4.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
thiag...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm late in this discussion, but I'm using ChenilleKit (just the Editor
component already) 1.0 with Tapestry 5.1.0.3 and it works without problems.
I just added an exclusion for Tapestry in the ChenilleKit Maven Dependency.
By the way, why Chenillekit has this name? Just curious. :)
Em Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:05:26 -0300, Geoff Callender
geoff.callender.jumpst...@gmail.com escreveu:
Please send them to me too!
Geoff
http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au
On 21/04/2009, at 3:43 AM, Inge Solvoll wrote:
Ok, I guess I'll just sit down and wait for the official 5.1 release for
all
the libraries I need :)
Anyway, if anyone feels like sending me their T5.1-compatible
chenillekit-core.jar and chenillekit-tapestry.jar in a zip file, I would
be
very happy. I know, lazy guy trying to get other people to do his work.
Just
ignore me :)
Inge
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Massimo Lusetti
mluse...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Another stupid question: How do I download the latest (5.1 compatible)
snapshot build of chenillekit? I'm not using maven. I managed to track
down
the following, but I guess it is not the newest available:
http://www.chenillekit.org/mvnrepo/snapshot/org/chenillekit/chenillekit-tapestry/1.0.1-SNAPSHOT/
This is for Tapestry 5.0 branch, for the 5.1 (current trunk) you have
to go with the Chenillekit Trunk which is 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
I looked around at tapestry.formos.com, but couldn't find anything.
You're right. The whole stuff is at Tapestry360 (tapesty.formos.com)
but we did not manage to have the migration complete, yet.
You have to download and build your own. Sorry.
Regards
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
Consultor, desenvolvedor e instrutor em Java
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Re: AjaxFormLoop Exception on 5.1.0.2 upgrade
Your exact same code is working fine using 5.1.0.5-SNAPSHOT on Jetty
6.1.6 run from inside Eclipse. Could you elaborate on your environment?
Also give removing and reinstalling all libs a try and make sure that
there aren't multiple versions of the same lib in your classpath.
Uli
Am 29.04.2009 08:56 schrieb zack1403:
Alright this is the simplest setup I could do. This is way simpler than even
the example thats in the nightly docs. I am getting the same error. If
someone could please help me out as to what I am missing here I would be
eternally grateful. This is the complete source, there is no other source
involved in this except what I am pasting.
Tml:
html xmlns:t=http://tapestry.apache.org/schema/tapestry_5_0_0.xsd;
t:form
t:ajaxformloop source=strings value=currentString
t:textfield t:id=thefield value=currentString/
t:removeRowLinkBye!/t:removeRowLink
/t:ajaxformloop
/t:form
/html
Page:
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import org.apache.tapestry5.annotations.Component;
import org.apache.tapestry5.annotations.Property;
import org.apache.tapestry5.corelib.components.TextField;
public class Test {
@Property
private ListString strings;
@Property
private String currentString;
@Component
private TextField theField;
void onActivate() {
strings = new ArrayListString();
strings.add(Hello);
strings.add(Heres a tester);
}
String onAddRow() {
return Added!;
}
void onRemoveRow(String toRemove) {
strings.remove(toRemove);
}
}
Sorry to be posting so much, I've just been pulling out my hair on this and
(as I'm sure you all understand) we have a very tight deadline to meet.
Thank you all again for all the help!
Zack
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Rendering partial Components with Environmental support
Hello, i have several custom components. Like in forms, some components require that they are nested another component. At the end it looks like: t:map t:id=pMap [... some arguments ...] t:imageLayer name=terrain / t:imageLayer name=scene / /t:map The communication between the components is like in forms with Environmental services realized. The MapSupport.class is pushed in @BeginRender of Map-Component and popped in @CleanupRender. t:imageLayer doesn't work without that environmental service. In order to add AJAX support to the map component, an eventlink on the client side fires an event in the Map-Component and i would like to return only the body of the Map-Component, so only the body of the component would be rendered. The problem is, that there is no invocation of the Render-Lifecycle methods in the Map-Component, so there is no MapSupport. How could i add this Environmental service in order to render the body properly and remove it after that, like in @CleanupRender. Or is there another way? Thanks and Greetings :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Submit a form in a zone in a component
Make sure the class whose objects are selected implement both hashCode() and equals(). This is typical source of errors not only with Tapestry, but with any collection as well. -- Thiago - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5] combination of linksubmit and submit fails
Hi, thanx for your response.
The failure stated: object does not support this function.
Apparently it was a browser issue using ids and functions of the same name,
also did it have something to do with caching of my browser.
it retained an element with id submit.
The javascript function of the linksubmit tried to call a function on this
element and that obvious failed.
this morning I tried to reproduce and everything went fine.
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
fails can mean many things. What exactly does it do?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Rolf Strijdhorst rol...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi is there a way to put both a linksubmit and a submit component on a
page?
when i press the linksubmit it fails at the javascript with the line
this.form.submit();
onClick : function(event)7828 {
7829 // Tapestry.debug(LinkSubmit #{id} clicked., this.element);
7830
7831 Event.stop(event);
7832
7833 var onsubmit = this.form.onsubmit;
7834
7835 if (onsubmit == undefined || onsubmit.call(window.document, event))
7836 {
7837 this.createHidden();
7838 this.form.submit();
7839 }
7840
7841 return false;
7842 }
7843});
thanx,
Rolf Strijdhorst
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-T5--combination-of-linksubmit-and-submit-fails-tp23285402p23295863.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [Tapestry360]
Thank you... Howard Lewis Ship schrieb: I must not have deployed it previously (?). Just ran a deploy. It's in http://tapestry.formos.com/maven-repository On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Andy Pahne andy.pa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am looking for the tapestry360-project in any maven repository. It appears not to be available in http://tapestry.formos.com/maven-snapshot-repository Or am I missing something? my maven error message: Cannot find parent: com.formos.tapestry:tapestry360-project for project: com.formos.tapestry:tapx-project:pom:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT for project com.formos.tapestry:tapx-project:pom:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT Andy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: InjectContainer and ProperyEditors
It's not a bug, it accurately reflects the structure of the page and the application. What you should be saying is that you need new API for your needs. 2009/4/29 José Paumard jose.paum...@orange.fr: Hello all, I'm trying to get a page from a component. I know two ways to do this : @Inject the ComponentResources and get the page from that object, or use the @InjectContainer to get it directly. Now my problem is the following : I am in a PropertyEditor, declared in an AppProperyEditor page. This component is used by the bean editor mechanism, and rendered in the page that holds the bean editor. The flaw is that in this case, the injected container is still the AppPropertyEditorPage, instead of the page that holds my bean editor. IMHO it's a bug, I dont see any use case where I would be interested in the AppPropertyEditor page. Is there a way to get the page that holds the bean editor when I am in a property editor component ? Thank you, José - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry Director of Open Source Technology at Formos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [T5] combination of linksubmit and submit fails
Perhaps there's an issue there, were certain component ids should not
be allowed, as they will conflict on the client side. A global ban on
components named submit would address this issue. It's all too easy
to do, since the default id of a Submit component is submit.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:29 AM, rolfst rol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, thanx for your response.
The failure stated: object does not support this function.
Apparently it was a browser issue using ids and functions of the same name,
also did it have something to do with caching of my browser.
it retained an element with id submit.
The javascript function of the linksubmit tried to call a function on this
element and that obvious failed.
this morning I tried to reproduce and everything went fine.
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
fails can mean many things. What exactly does it do?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Rolf Strijdhorst rol...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi is there a way to put both a linksubmit and a submit component on a
page?
when i press the linksubmit it fails at the javascript with the line
this.form.submit();
onClick : function(event)7828 {
7829 // Tapestry.debug(LinkSubmit #{id} clicked., this.element);
7830
7831 Event.stop(event);
7832
7833 var onsubmit = this.form.onsubmit;
7834
7835 if (onsubmit == undefined || onsubmit.call(window.document, event))
7836 {
7837 this.createHidden();
7838 this.form.submit();
7839 }
7840
7841 return false;
7842 }
7843});
thanx,
Rolf Strijdhorst
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-T5--combination-of-linksubmit-and-submit-fails-tp23285402p23295863.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Submit a form in a zone in a component
I have two forms in my component, I discovered that if I place my select in my first form, the value is well binded :confused: -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Submit-a-form-in-a-zone-in-a-component-tp23295673p23296111.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tapestry 5.1.0.4 (beta release)
I just reviewed all code changes since 5.1.0.3 and I can't see
anything that would account for this. TapestryIOCModule hasn't
changed, and I can't see anyway that the changes to TapestryModule
would account for this error ... or really, the lack of error in
5.1.0.3.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Jun Tsai jun.t...@gmail.com wrote:
upgrade to 5.1.0.4,the following code throws exception,but 5.1.0.3 works
fine!
/**
* Contributes the remote scope.
*/
public void contributeServiceLifecycleSource(
MappedConfigurationString, ServiceLifecycle configuration
) {
configuration.addInstance(CornerConstants.REMOTE_SCOPE,RemoteCallServiceLifecycle.class);
}
attachement is exception stack.
2009/4/28 Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com
Tapestry 5.1.0.4 is now available via Maven and the Apache Mirrors.
http://tapestry.apache.org/download.html
This is a bug fix release, addressing a number of problems present in
5.1.0.3, and stabilizing the URLRewriter APIs.
We are looking forward to community feedback on this release; it looks
like there will be a .5 release to fix a small number of annoyances.
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
regards,
Jun Tsai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
[t:5.0.18] tapestry component id attribute value format
Hello all,
A tapestry component for example:
input t:type=textfield t:id=text1 /
after the component is rendered, it becomes something like:
input id=text1:120f2926924 name=text1 type=text
what is the number 120f2926924? how do I get this number from the client
side, for example if I need to set the value of this input field through
javascript, I would like to do something like:
$('text1').value = new value;
but how do I know the id of this element after it is rendered?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-t%3A5.0.18--tapestry-component-id-attribute-value-format-tp23296131p23296131.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [t:5.0.18] tapestry component id attribute value format
That's a unique id injected into the client id as part of a partial page update.
Use the TextField's getClientId() method, after it has rendered, to
determine what clientId was assigned to it.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:08 AM, roubaozi lagjazz.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
A tapestry component for example:
input t:type=textfield t:id=text1 /
after the component is rendered, it becomes something like:
input id=text1:120f2926924 name=text1 type=text
what is the number 120f2926924? how do I get this number from the client
side, for example if I need to set the value of this input field through
javascript, I would like to do something like:
$('text1').value = new value;
but how do I know the id of this element after it is rendered?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-t%3A5.0.18--tapestry-component-id-attribute-value-format-tp23296131p23296131.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Rendering partial Components with Environmental support
Forgot to mention that i use the tapestry 5.1.0.3 :) Christian Senk schrieb: Hello, i have several custom components. Like in forms, some components require that they are nested another component. At the end it looks like: t:map t:id=pMap [... some arguments ...] t:imageLayer name=terrain / t:imageLayer name=scene / /t:map The communication between the components is like in forms with Environmental services realized. The MapSupport.class is pushed in @BeginRender of Map-Component and popped in @CleanupRender. t:imageLayer doesn't work without that environmental service. In order to add AJAX support to the map component, an eventlink on the client side fires an event in the Map-Component and i would like to return only the body of the Map-Component, so only the body of the component would be rendered. The problem is, that there is no invocation of the Render-Lifecycle methods in the Map-Component, so there is no MapSupport. How could i add this Environmental service in order to render the body properly and remove it after that, like in @CleanupRender. Or is there another way? Thanks and Greetings :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Injection and non-component non-service classes?
Is there any way to have a non-component class work with injection, w/o having to turn it into a service itself? @Inject private SystemProperties sysProps; I have a class that simply zips up files, and it needs access to a system properties service. IIRC, but when I tried this in the past, it didn't work for classes that were not pages/components. I also don't want to necessarily turn a class into a service merely to give it access to another service. Any way to do this? Or was I simply doing it wrong before? -Daniel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: AjaxFormLoop Exception on 5.1.0.2 upgrade
Well the thing is that its reproducible when I deploy on my staging server to tomcat 6 from the generated war file. As well as locally with jetty 6.1.6. I am using the maven plugin to run goal jetty:run locally. Zack Ulrich Stärk wrote: Your exact same code is working fine using 5.1.0.5-SNAPSHOT on Jetty 6.1.6 run from inside Eclipse. Could you elaborate on your environment? Also give removing and reinstalling all libs a try and make sure that there aren't multiple versions of the same lib in your classpath. Uli -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFormLoop-Exception-on-5.1.0.2-upgrade-tp23175801p23297560.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Injection and non-component non-service classes?
In the following scenario:
public void contributeMyConfiguration(ConfigurationFoo
configuration, @Autobuild FooImpl foo)
{
configuration.add(foo);
}
Tapestry will autobuild foo using the same rules as services. Another approach:
public void contributeMyConfiguration(ConfigurationFoo configuration)
{
configuration.addInstance(FooImpl.class);
}
This is an alternate way to inject an autobuild instance of the class.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:56 AM, daniel joyce daniel.a.jo...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any way to have a non-component class work with injection,
w/o having to turn it into a service itself?
@Inject
private SystemProperties sysProps;
I have a class that simply zips up files, and it needs access to a
system properties service. IIRC, but when I tried this in the past, it
didn't work for classes that were not pages/components. I also don't
want to necessarily turn a class into a service merely to give it
access to another service.
Any way to do this? Or was I simply doing it wrong before?
-Daniel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Injection and non-component non-service classes?
I have a class C, that is not a service, nor a page/component
I want to Inject a resource into it
@Inject
SomeService service
When I use new C(), I want them to be seperate instances, not
singletons, or per-thread singletons, with that service wired in.
Will what you posted do this?
Because when I hear Autobuild, my understanding is it generates
singletons. But there is no guarantee this class C which is using
SomeService is itself written to be a threadsafe singleton.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote:
In the following scenario:
public void contributeMyConfiguration(ConfigurationFoo
configuration, @Autobuild FooImpl foo)
{
configuration.add(foo);
}
Tapestry will autobuild foo using the same rules as services. Another
approach:
public void contributeMyConfiguration(ConfigurationFoo configuration)
{
configuration.addInstance(FooImpl.class);
}
This is an alternate way to inject an autobuild instance of the class.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:56 AM, daniel joyce daniel.a.jo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there any way to have a non-component class work with injection,
w/o having to turn it into a service itself?
@Inject
private SystemProperties sysProps;
I have a class that simply zips up files, and it needs access to a
system properties service. IIRC, but when I tried this in the past, it
didn't work for classes that were not pages/components. I also don't
want to necessarily turn a class into a service merely to give it
access to another service.
Any way to do this? Or was I simply doing it wrong before?
-Daniel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Injection and non-component non-service classes?
There isn't a mechanism for doing this via new C(). Tapestry IoC is
less intrusive than tapestry-core, it doesn't instrument your code the
way the web framework does, but it will use reflection to inject into
private fields.
@Autobuild always creates a new instance.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:27 AM, daniel joyce daniel.a.jo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a class C, that is not a service, nor a page/component
I want to Inject a resource into it
@Inject
SomeService service
When I use new C(), I want them to be seperate instances, not
singletons, or per-thread singletons, with that service wired in.
Will what you posted do this?
Because when I hear Autobuild, my understanding is it generates
singletons. But there is no guarantee this class C which is using
SomeService is itself written to be a threadsafe singleton.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote:
In the following scenario:
public void contributeMyConfiguration(ConfigurationFoo
configuration, @Autobuild FooImpl foo)
{
configuration.add(foo);
}
Tapestry will autobuild foo using the same rules as services. Another
approach:
public void contributeMyConfiguration(ConfigurationFoo configuration)
{
configuration.addInstance(FooImpl.class);
}
This is an alternate way to inject an autobuild instance of the class.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:56 AM, daniel joyce daniel.a.jo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there any way to have a non-component class work with injection,
w/o having to turn it into a service itself?
@Inject
private SystemProperties sysProps;
I have a class that simply zips up files, and it needs access to a
system properties service. IIRC, but when I tried this in the past, it
didn't work for classes that were not pages/components. I also don't
want to necessarily turn a class into a service merely to give it
access to another service.
Any way to do this? Or was I simply doing it wrong before?
-Daniel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: persist strategy
Kalle, i couldn't make it work
I used exactly the examples on the page. My application uses tapestry
spring security, equanda and chenillekit. In case it matters.
The boolean expression in this line:
if (!conversationManager.isActiveConversation(conversationId)) {
once conversation is created, always returns false, so conversation
remains the same even when I navigate to another page.
Another thing is that conversation persisted fields never remember
their values if I create the conversation with useCookie = false
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks in advance
Jorge
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 19:51 -0700, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Codehaus release repo is automatically synched to repo1.maven.org, but it
takes a day or so after a release. Available now at
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/trailsframework/tapestry-conversations/0.0.2/
.
Kalle
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Scott Russell scottam...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you supply a download link for 0.0.2? I can't find one on your site,
and maven still shows only 0.0.1 available. I'll take a look and see if it
fixes the problem I was having.
cheers,
Scott
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 14:34:30 Kalle Korhonen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Scott Russell scottam...@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried your conversation module (v0.0.1) and it works quite well,
except
that I found a bug whereby the Conversation, upon being initially
created,
wasn't being activated properly. However, I patched it and found it to
work
quite well. Do you have a bug tracking site somewhere that I could file
the
bug and the fix?
I believe you are referring to
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TRAILS-170which is fixed in 0.0.2. The
link to JIRA component is at
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TRAILS/component/13674. The module is
developed as part of Trails. For 0.0.2 I renamed the artifactId from
trails-conversations to tapestry-conversations to indicate it can be used
independently from the rest of Trails modules. 0.0.2 also has the
optional
ConversationModerator component to track idle conversations and to notify
user. Obviously the library is still in its infancy which is why haven't
made much noise about it but I've been using it in my own projects and
found
it to work very well.
Kalle
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 08:38:59 Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Use either flash persistence strategy (
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/guide/persist.html) or create a
conversation (
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/TRAILS/Conversations+in+Trails, just
released 0.0.2).
Kalle
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Jorge Saridis jsari...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
In Tapestry 4.1, I used a persistence strategy named session-page
obtained from http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/SessionPagePersistence
,
that allows discard session values when user exits the page.
How can I do this in Tapestry 5?
Thanks in advance
Jorge
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Injection and non-component non-service classes?
So basically once I start using Injection, every class that uses a
injected class needs to be injected itself.
It would be nice if this could be improved upon, thus allowing
'services' and non-page, non-service business objects to play nicely
together.
-Daniel
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote:
There isn't a mechanism for doing this via new C(). Tapestry IoC is
less intrusive than tapestry-core, it doesn't instrument your code the
way the web framework does, but it will use reflection to inject into
private fields.
@Autobuild always creates a new instance.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:27 AM, daniel joyce daniel.a.jo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have a class C, that is not a service, nor a page/component
I want to Inject a resource into it
@Inject
SomeService service
When I use new C(), I want them to be seperate instances, not
singletons, or per-thread singletons, with that service wired in.
Will what you posted do this?
Because when I hear Autobuild, my understanding is it generates
singletons. But there is no guarantee this class C which is using
SomeService is itself written to be a threadsafe singleton.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote:
In the following scenario:
public void contributeMyConfiguration(ConfigurationFoo
configuration, @Autobuild FooImpl foo)
{
configuration.add(foo);
}
Tapestry will autobuild foo using the same rules as services. Another
approach:
public void contributeMyConfiguration(ConfigurationFoo configuration)
{
configuration.addInstance(FooImpl.class);
}
This is an alternate way to inject an autobuild instance of the class.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:56 AM, daniel joyce daniel.a.jo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there any way to have a non-component class work with injection,
w/o having to turn it into a service itself?
@Inject
private SystemProperties sysProps;
I have a class that simply zips up files, and it needs access to a
system properties service. IIRC, but when I tried this in the past, it
didn't work for classes that were not pages/components. I also don't
want to necessarily turn a class into a service merely to give it
access to another service.
Any way to do this? Or was I simply doing it wrong before?
-Daniel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Injection and non-component non-service classes?
Something like DecorateTransactionally that could be used to tell
Tapestry IOC which classes are using injected fields, and do the
injection/instrumentation on them.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:10 PM, daniel joyce daniel.a.jo...@gmail.com wrote:
So basically once I start using Injection, every class that uses a
injected class needs to be injected itself.
It would be nice if this could be improved upon, thus allowing
'services' and non-page, non-service business objects to play nicely
together.
-Daniel
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com wrote:
There isn't a mechanism for doing this via new C(). Tapestry IoC is
less intrusive than tapestry-core, it doesn't instrument your code the
way the web framework does, but it will use reflection to inject into
private fields.
@Autobuild always creates a new instance.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:27 AM, daniel joyce daniel.a.jo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have a class C, that is not a service, nor a page/component
I want to Inject a resource into it
@Inject
SomeService service
When I use new C(), I want them to be seperate instances, not
singletons, or per-thread singletons, with that service wired in.
Will what you posted do this?
Because when I hear Autobuild, my understanding is it generates
singletons. But there is no guarantee this class C which is using
SomeService is itself written to be a threadsafe singleton.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com
wrote:
In the following scenario:
public void contributeMyConfiguration(ConfigurationFoo
configuration, @Autobuild FooImpl foo)
{
configuration.add(foo);
}
Tapestry will autobuild foo using the same rules as services. Another
approach:
public void contributeMyConfiguration(ConfigurationFoo configuration)
{
configuration.addInstance(FooImpl.class);
}
This is an alternate way to inject an autobuild instance of the class.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:56 AM, daniel joyce daniel.a.jo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there any way to have a non-component class work with injection,
w/o having to turn it into a service itself?
@Inject
private SystemProperties sysProps;
I have a class that simply zips up files, and it needs access to a
system properties service. IIRC, but when I tried this in the past, it
didn't work for classes that were not pages/components. I also don't
want to necessarily turn a class into a service merely to give it
access to another service.
Any way to do this? Or was I simply doing it wrong before?
-Daniel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Injection and non-component non-service classes?
IE, Class A is a service Class B @Inject A a Class C then uses Class B, but in order to access it, Class B must be added to the appmodule via contrib config, and then class C needs Class C @Inject B b Then class D uses Class C, and it goes on and on. Once any class in the chain uses a service, they all then need to be autobuilt in some fashion, and you can't use new anymore. You can't break the chain as it were, and mix constructors with autoinjected private fields. It would be nice if you could go in your appmodule and say something like @Match(A) public static T T injectFields() On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:10 PM, daniel joyce daniel.a.jo...@gmail.com wrote: So basically once I start using Injection, every class that uses a injected class needs to be injected itself. It would be nice if this could be improved upon, thus allowing 'services' and non-page, non-service business objects to play nicely together. -Daniel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: persist strategy
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jorge Saridis jsari...@gmail.com wrote:
Kalle, i couldn't make it work
I used exactly the examples on the page. My application uses tapestry
spring security, equanda and chenillekit. In case it matters.
I'm using chenillekit, but not equanda and instead of spring security,
jsecurity/ki integration with Tapestry. I'm using 0.0.3 of
Trails-conversations in a production app without issues. The two things that
could make a difference is Spring security and possibly the version of T5 -
I have not tested against T5.1 yet.
The boolean expression in this line:
if (!conversationManager.isActiveConversation(conversationId)) {
once conversation is created, always returns false, so conversation
remains the same even when I navigate to another page.
Another thing is that conversation persisted fields never remember
their values if I create the conversation with useCookie = false
What am I doing wrong?
Well, sounds like the conversation is not being activated properly -
obviously the values should be remembered if the conversation is active.
There are multiple different ways to set it up. There's a working example of
conversations in Trails trunk at
http://svn.codehaus.org/trails/trunk/trails/examples/trails-examples-conversations/.
But first things first - have you verified that conversationId is not null?
I.e. you are persisting conversationId to session? Might be easier to find
the problem if you join #trails on irc.codehaus.org.
Kalle
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 19:51 -0700, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Codehaus release repo is automatically synched to repo1.maven.org, but
it
takes a day or so after a release. Available now at
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/trailsframework/tapestry-conversations/0.0.2/
.
Kalle
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Scott Russell scottam...@gmail.com
wrote:
Could you supply a download link for 0.0.2? I can't find one on your
site,
and maven still shows only 0.0.1 available. I'll take a look and see if
it
fixes the problem I was having.
cheers,
Scott
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 14:34:30 Kalle Korhonen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Scott Russell scottam...@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried your conversation module (v0.0.1) and it works quite well,
except
that I found a bug whereby the Conversation, upon being initially
created,
wasn't being activated properly. However, I patched it and found it
to
work
quite well. Do you have a bug tracking site somewhere that I could
file
the
bug and the fix?
I believe you are referring to
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TRAILS-170which is fixed in 0.0.2.
The
link to JIRA component is at
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TRAILS/component/13674. The module
is
developed as part of Trails. For 0.0.2 I renamed the artifactId from
trails-conversations to tapestry-conversations to indicate it can be
used
independently from the rest of Trails modules. 0.0.2 also has the
optional
ConversationModerator component to track idle conversations and to
notify
user. Obviously the library is still in its infancy which is why
haven't
made much noise about it but I've been using it in my own projects
and
found
it to work very well.
Kalle
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 08:38:59 Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Use either flash persistence strategy (
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/guide/persist.html) or create
a
conversation (
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/TRAILS/Conversations+in+Trails,
just
released 0.0.2).
Kalle
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Jorge Saridis jsari...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
In Tapestry 4.1, I used a persistence strategy named
session-page
obtained from
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/SessionPagePersistence
,
that allows discard session values when user exits the page.
How can I do this in Tapestry 5?
Thanks in advance
Jorge
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: AjaxFormLoop Exception on 5.1.0.2 upgrade
Knowing that that simple example worked for everyone, I started hacking away
at my app module. Finally narrowed down what was causing the issue:
public void contributeMasterDispatcher(OrderedConfigurationDispatcher
configuration, @InjectService(AuthDispatcher) Dispatcher authDispatcher) {
configuration.add(AuthDispatcher, authDispatcher,
before:PageRender);
}
In this case, the error sure didn't help the situation at all. I am pretty
sure I am adding my dispatcher correctly as it performs as expected
everywhere else. For some reason it is messing with ajaxformloop. Tested
my other ajaxformloops and they all work after commenting out these few
lines. I guess I'm on to another issue of why this is causing issues :(
Really, thanks again for everyones help. This error does sound like
something that is being misreported as it is unrelated to the actual cause.
Maybe a bug?
Zack
Ulrich Stärk wrote:
Your exact same code is working fine using 5.1.0.5-SNAPSHOT on Jetty
6.1.6 run from inside Eclipse. Could you elaborate on your environment?
Also give removing and reinstalling all libs a try and make sure that
there aren't multiple versions of the same lib in your classpath.
Uli
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFormLoop-Exception-on-5.1.0.2-upgrade-tp23175801p23301366.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: T5: What is NOT beautiful about Tapestry?
I agree, I think this will be a constructive thread. So things that are not beautiful yet are a lack of tooling, aside from the helpful Loom plugin. I only use eclipse here, so I'm not sure if there are plugins for other IDEs. Sometimes I wish there were more industry type examples out there, since I often find myself writing something that is overly verbose. I find myself looking at code on http://www.google.com/codesearch . Maybe a reproduction of the T4 Showcase app would make a good archetype. Maven usage used to be a problem for some, but I think most of us have gotten used to it or have worked around it. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.comwrote: Hi! I have been reading the beautiful thread and added my opinion about what's great about Tapestry. It's nice to sum up why we all are so excited about this, it obviously makes both us and the creator(s) feel good about ourselves. But for a little while, I challenge us all to stop tapping each others' backs and go into depth about what's not to like about our beloved framework. The most obvious questions that could be asked probably have some very obvious answers. But T5, as I see it, is all about addressing stuff that other frameworks have given up on and create excellent implementations rather than just looking the other way. Difficult and uncomfortable questions should be addressed the same way. So: What are the main reasons that T5 isn't one of the big ones, when we all seem to agree that it is so much better than most other frameworks out there? Why is T5 NOT beautiful? Hope I'm not insulting anyone, I'm a big fan too, I just think this actually could lead to significant insight :) Regards Inge
Re: T5: What is NOT beautiful about Tapestry?
Discovery of it's parts. Franky the documentation is lacking and even with reading the mailing list, reading the howtos wiki, buying the Tapestry 5 book and working with it for over a year I still come across things I never knew existed that would have solved a problem I've had. I often spend ages writing something myself after searching for a solution. What's beautiful about Tapestry? That almost every problem has a simple solution built in. What's not beautiful about Tapestry? That I generally find these solutions by accident, and way after I've written my own! Lots of things are obvious and easy to understand once you know what they are but it's learning what they are that is the problem. I've been waxing lyrical about Tapestry where I work and while the developers who tried it love it, their main gripe is always that it's difficult to understand what it can do. The cookbook is the right idea but it's only got 5 entries right now. It needs to be way more comprehensive Inge Solvoll wrote: Hi! I have been reading the beautiful thread and added my opinion about what's great about Tapestry. It's nice to sum up why we all are so excited about this, it obviously makes both us and the creator(s) feel good about ourselves. But for a little while, I challenge us all to stop tapping each others' backs and go into depth about what's not to like about our beloved framework. The most obvious questions that could be asked probably have some very obvious answers. But T5, as I see it, is all about addressing stuff that other frameworks have given up on and create excellent implementations rather than just looking the other way. Difficult and uncomfortable questions should be addressed the same way. So: What are the main reasons that T5 isn't one of the big ones, when we all seem to agree that it is so much better than most other frameworks out there? Why is T5 NOT beautiful? Hope I'm not insulting anyone, I'm a big fan too, I just think this actually could lead to significant insight :) Regards Inge - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: T5: What is NOT beautiful about Tapestry?
The flexibility of T5, in that almost every task it performs is handled by a different service that can be overwritten has a downfall. It sometimes takes me a long time to figure out what service handles what task and how can it be overwritten (the under documentation argument obviously plays a role here). Some of the reflection can make debugging harder at times and annotations over POJO's takes some time to get used to (but maybe that is a java5+ wide argument). My 2 cents, Joost On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Inge Solvoll inge.tapes...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I have been reading the beautiful thread and added my opinion about what's great about Tapestry. It's nice to sum up why we all are so excited about this, it obviously makes both us and the creator(s) feel good about ourselves. But for a little while, I challenge us all to stop tapping each others' backs and go into depth about what's not to like about our beloved framework. The most obvious questions that could be asked probably have some very obvious answers. But T5, as I see it, is all about addressing stuff that other frameworks have given up on and create excellent implementations rather than just looking the other way. Difficult and uncomfortable questions should be addressed the same way. So: What are the main reasons that T5 isn't one of the big ones, when we all seem to agree that it is so much better than most other frameworks out there? Why is T5 NOT beautiful? Hope I'm not insulting anyone, I'm a big fan too, I just think this actually could lead to significant insight :) Regards Inge - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: T5: What is NOT beautiful about Tapestry?
The problem probably lies with the fact that many of us have learned T5 gradually while it was being developed and that is why most of the things seem easy and natural. It might not be so when you see the T5 for the first time. Don't get me wrong, I think everything is ok with the framework, but some more examples would certainly help. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: persist strategy
Kalle, I'm using Tapestry 5.0.18, I'm checking if conversationId is null
and I'm persisting to session conversationId
When do I find you on #trails?
Thanks
Jorge
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 12:49 -0700, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jorge Saridis jsari...@gmail.com wrote:
Kalle, i couldn't make it work
I used exactly the examples on the page. My application uses tapestry
spring security, equanda and chenillekit. In case it matters.
I'm using chenillekit, but not equanda and instead of spring security,
jsecurity/ki integration with Tapestry. I'm using 0.0.3 of
Trails-conversations in a production app without issues. The two things that
could make a difference is Spring security and possibly the version of T5 -
I have not tested against T5.1 yet.
The boolean expression in this line:
if (!conversationManager.isActiveConversation(conversationId)) {
once conversation is created, always returns false, so conversation
remains the same even when I navigate to another page.
Another thing is that conversation persisted fields never remember
their values if I create the conversation with useCookie = false
What am I doing wrong?
Well, sounds like the conversation is not being activated properly -
obviously the values should be remembered if the conversation is active.
There are multiple different ways to set it up. There's a working example of
conversations in Trails trunk at
http://svn.codehaus.org/trails/trunk/trails/examples/trails-examples-conversations/.
But first things first - have you verified that conversationId is not null?
I.e. you are persisting conversationId to session? Might be easier to find
the problem if you join #trails on irc.codehaus.org.
Kalle
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 19:51 -0700, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Codehaus release repo is automatically synched to repo1.maven.org, but
it
takes a day or so after a release. Available now at
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/trailsframework/tapestry-conversations/0.0.2/
.
Kalle
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Scott Russell scottam...@gmail.com
wrote:
Could you supply a download link for 0.0.2? I can't find one on your
site,
and maven still shows only 0.0.1 available. I'll take a look and see if
it
fixes the problem I was having.
cheers,
Scott
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 14:34:30 Kalle Korhonen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Scott Russell scottam...@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried your conversation module (v0.0.1) and it works quite well,
except
that I found a bug whereby the Conversation, upon being initially
created,
wasn't being activated properly. However, I patched it and found it
to
work
quite well. Do you have a bug tracking site somewhere that I could
file
the
bug and the fix?
I believe you are referring to
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TRAILS-170which is fixed in 0.0.2.
The
link to JIRA component is at
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TRAILS/component/13674. The module
is
developed as part of Trails. For 0.0.2 I renamed the artifactId from
trails-conversations to tapestry-conversations to indicate it can be
used
independently from the rest of Trails modules. 0.0.2 also has the
optional
ConversationModerator component to track idle conversations and to
notify
user. Obviously the library is still in its infancy which is why
haven't
made much noise about it but I've been using it in my own projects
and
found
it to work very well.
Kalle
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 08:38:59 Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Use either flash persistence strategy (
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/guide/persist.html) or create
a
conversation (
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/TRAILS/Conversations+in+Trails,
just
released 0.0.2).
Kalle
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Jorge Saridis jsari...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
In Tapestry 4.1, I used a persistence strategy named
session-page
obtained from
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/SessionPagePersistence
,
that allows discard session values when user exits the page.
How can I do this in Tapestry 5?
Thanks in advance
Jorge
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: persist strategy
Now. I see you just left. You need to ping me on irc - i.e. call my id -
otherwise I won't know somebody is asking for me.
Kalle
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Jorge Saridis jsari...@gmail.com wrote:
Kalle, I'm using Tapestry 5.0.18, I'm checking if conversationId is null
and I'm persisting to session conversationId
When do I find you on #trails?
Thanks
Jorge
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 12:49 -0700, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jorge Saridis jsari...@gmail.com
wrote:
Kalle, i couldn't make it work
I used exactly the examples on the page. My application uses tapestry
spring security, equanda and chenillekit. In case it matters.
I'm using chenillekit, but not equanda and instead of spring security,
jsecurity/ki integration with Tapestry. I'm using 0.0.3 of
Trails-conversations in a production app without issues. The two things
that
could make a difference is Spring security and possibly the version of T5
-
I have not tested against T5.1 yet.
The boolean expression in this line:
if (!conversationManager.isActiveConversation(conversationId)) {
once conversation is created, always returns false, so conversation
remains the same even when I navigate to another page.
Another thing is that conversation persisted fields never remember
their values if I create the conversation with useCookie = false
What am I doing wrong?
Well, sounds like the conversation is not being activated properly -
obviously the values should be remembered if the conversation is active.
There are multiple different ways to set it up. There's a working example
of
conversations in Trails trunk at
http://svn.codehaus.org/trails/trunk/trails/examples/trails-examples-conversations/
.
But first things first - have you verified that conversationId is not
null?
I.e. you are persisting conversationId to session? Might be easier to
find
the problem if you join #trails on irc.codehaus.org.
Kalle
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 19:51 -0700, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Codehaus release repo is automatically synched to repo1.maven.org,
but
it
takes a day or so after a release. Available now at
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/trailsframework/tapestry-conversations/0.0.2/
.
Kalle
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Scott Russell scottam...@gmail.com
wrote:
Could you supply a download link for 0.0.2? I can't find one on
your
site,
and maven still shows only 0.0.1 available. I'll take a look and
see if
it
fixes the problem I was having.
cheers,
Scott
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 14:34:30 Kalle Korhonen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Scott Russell
scottam...@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried your conversation module (v0.0.1) and it works quite
well,
except
that I found a bug whereby the Conversation, upon being
initially
created,
wasn't being activated properly. However, I patched it and
found it
to
work
quite well. Do you have a bug tracking site somewhere that I
could
file
the
bug and the fix?
I believe you are referring to
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TRAILS-170which is fixed in
0.0.2.
The
link to JIRA component is at
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TRAILS/component/13674. The
module
is
developed as part of Trails. For 0.0.2 I renamed the artifactId
from
trails-conversations to tapestry-conversations to indicate it can
be
used
independently from the rest of Trails modules. 0.0.2 also has the
optional
ConversationModerator component to track idle conversations and
to
notify
user. Obviously the library is still in its infancy which is why
haven't
made much noise about it but I've been using it in my own
projects
and
found
it to work very well.
Kalle
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 08:38:59 Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Use either flash persistence strategy (
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/guide/persist.html) or
create
a
conversation (
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/TRAILS/Conversations+in+Trails,
just
released 0.0.2).
Kalle
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Jorge Saridis
jsari...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
In Tapestry 4.1, I used a persistence strategy named
session-page
obtained from
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/SessionPagePersistence
,
that allows discard session values when user exits the page.
How can I do this in Tapestry 5?
Thanks in advance
Jorge
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: T5: What is NOT beautiful about Tapestry?
So, we've clearly hit on documentation being an issue. ;) Two other things that I think are problematic for newcomers to tapestry: * static structure, dynamic behavior. I agree with HLS's choice on this, but it does create a barrier for a lot of people; the programming model in, eg, Wicket is just easier to wrap your head around: how do I dynamically get some different component on the page? Instantiate it Again, I'm not advocating changing static structure, dynamic behavior, but I wonder if there's a way that we can hurdle the barrier here... I have no ideas on this as yet. * Related to above, having pages that exist for no other reason than to be holders for components that will be dynamically injected seems a bit... ugly. Maybe we could have a dedicated dynamic component holder? At the very least, having a simple annotation such as: @DynamicComponentHolder on the page classes, and having tapestry recognize that the page isn't actually a page meant to be rendered directly, and take steps accordingly (shut down requests for those pages, etc.) might be nice. * Ajax. Zones rock, but otherwise, ajax in tapestry is still... lacking, IMHO. I think tapestry could go a /long/ way toward making things easier here. For instance, the form injector component: it's useful, but I find it painful to use, and, it's really only interesting if you're planning on dynamically adding additional form elements (or removing them). But things like dynamic updates of bits and pieces of forms are painful... tapestry really go out of its way to ensure that the same state available in rendering the request, or in a full post, is available during an ajax request (I'm thinking particularly of the fact that the Form isn't in the environment (unless you use form injector). Robert On Apr 29, 2009, at 4/294:04 PM , Pete Poulos wrote: I am currently learning tapestry and while I agree with the concept of Convention over Configuration, as newbie I would really like to see all of the conventions clearly documented in one location. As it is right now I feel that I have to hunt around for them and I am worried that there are conventions that I am not aware of. Also, the documentation seems to dive into the details fairly quickly. It would be nice to see a page which clearly defines the breadth/scope of Tapestry. What components/modules are there? What can they do? Where are they located? How can I learn more about them? I am impressed with what I have seen so far, but it has been hard to figure out how to start and to clearly answer the following question: What parts of Tapestry should I have under my belt before I can claim that I know Tapestry? Maybe some of these answers are there already and I have either overlooked them or been unable to find them. Pete - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: T5: What is NOT beautiful about Tapestry?
Let's say that the don't get me wrong, I love Tapestry-part is implicit in all replies to this thread, so we're all covered :) Some more questions: 1. What, politically, made it hard to introduce T5 in your organisation? Who resisted, and why? 2. What, technically, made it hard to introduce/teach T5 among your programmer colleagues? (some already mentioned documentation) 3. Why is JSF more popular than Tapestry? Other than the obvious standard from Sun? Something about documentation again maybe? Ask the Spring guys about fighting against standards from Sun. They beat EJB... :) On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Robert Zeigler robe...@scazdl.org wrote: So, we've clearly hit on documentation being an issue. ;) Two other things that I think are problematic for newcomers to tapestry: * static structure, dynamic behavior. I agree with HLS's choice on this, but it does create a barrier for a lot of people; the programming model in, eg, Wicket is just easier to wrap your head around: how do I dynamically get some different component on the page? Instantiate it Again, I'm not advocating changing static structure, dynamic behavior, but I wonder if there's a way that we can hurdle the barrier here... I have no ideas on this as yet. * Related to above, having pages that exist for no other reason than to be holders for components that will be dynamically injected seems a bit... ugly. Maybe we could have a dedicated dynamic component holder? At the very least, having a simple annotation such as: @DynamicComponentHolder on the page classes, and having tapestry recognize that the page isn't actually a page meant to be rendered directly, and take steps accordingly (shut down requests for those pages, etc.) might be nice. * Ajax. Zones rock, but otherwise, ajax in tapestry is still... lacking, IMHO. I think tapestry could go a /long/ way toward making things easier here. For instance, the form injector component: it's useful, but I find it painful to use, and, it's really only interesting if you're planning on dynamically adding additional form elements (or removing them). But things like dynamic updates of bits and pieces of forms are painful... tapestry really go out of its way to ensure that the same state available in rendering the request, or in a full post, is available during an ajax request (I'm thinking particularly of the fact that the Form isn't in the environment (unless you use form injector). Robert On Apr 29, 2009, at 4/294:04 PM , Pete Poulos wrote: I am currently learning tapestry and while I agree with the concept of Convention over Configuration, as newbie I would really like to see all of the conventions clearly documented in one location. As it is right now I feel that I have to hunt around for them and I am worried that there are conventions that I am not aware of. Also, the documentation seems to dive into the details fairly quickly. It would be nice to see a page which clearly defines the breadth/scope of Tapestry. What components/modules are there? What can they do? Where are they located? How can I learn more about them? I am impressed with what I have seen so far, but it has been hard to figure out how to start and to clearly answer the following question: What parts of Tapestry should I have under my belt before I can claim that I know Tapestry? Maybe some of these answers are there already and I have either overlooked them or been unable to find them. Pete - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: T5: What is NOT beautiful about Tapestry?
Inge Solvoll schrieb: 1. What, politically, made it hard to introduce T5 in your organisation? Who resisted, and why? I am sure there a two things which could help at promotion for convincing decision makers: Real big live sites running under tapestry and a good up to date book. 2. What, technically, made it hard to introduce/teach T5 among your programmer colleagues? (some already mentioned documentation) As bigger sites hardly start from scratch, I see the legacy reason as a big technical point. Usually big codebases rely on action/command focused frameworks (e.g. struts, spring mvc) and it is extremely hard to refactor them to page and component based ones. Also I see that frontend people are being used to work with JSP, freemarker etc. and are a bit hesitating to look at yet another templating technology. I really like tapestry concepts and helps a lot to think in different directions even if you don't use it in daily job. About tap-ioc I really like to java-code style injection and configuration instead for XML. - manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Submit a form in a zone in a component
It was already done (all my model objects and dtos implement hashcode and equals), and the same select gave me the good binding on a separate page %-| Now I have simplified my component, particularly with zones (I have now only one zone for all my component), and the binding works fine now. Great but I don't really understand where was the problem :confused: I will try to add new zones soon... Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: Make sure the class whose objects are selected implement both hashCode() and equals(). This is typical source of errors not only with Tapestry, but with any collection as well. -- Thiago - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Submit-a-form-in-a-zone-in-a-component-tp23295673p23302557.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Solving the T5 Documentation Dilemma
One of the issues with T5 documentation is that it is written in Maven APT format. This is better than HTML or even various XML docbook-lite kind of things, but it ties documentation down to the Tapestry release cycle. Perhaps it would be better if all documentation was moved onto a live wiki. This has the advantage that more people can work on it, beyond just the T5 committers. I don't think Tapestry's wiki, http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry, is up to the task. I've set up Confluence at Tapestry360: http://tapestry.formos.com/wiki/dashboard.action This is a more industrial strength wiki, better organized, good WYSIWYG editor, good support for images and attachments, and tons of features I don't know or understand yet. The downside of this is that it will be harder to correlate documentation against releases. We've seen this before, when I might publish on the list of the nightly docs some new features, and then a raft of errors about it not working come in. Also, I haven't had the bandwidth to validate the many notes and how-tos on the current Wiki. I'm not sure I would personally be able to do better on Confluence. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:31 PM, manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de wrote: Inge Solvoll schrieb: 1. What, politically, made it hard to introduce T5 in your organisation? Who resisted, and why? I am sure there a two things which could help at promotion for convincing decision makers: Real big live sites running under tapestry and a good up to date book. 2. What, technically, made it hard to introduce/teach T5 among your programmer colleagues? (some already mentioned documentation) As bigger sites hardly start from scratch, I see the legacy reason as a big technical point. Usually big codebases rely on action/command focused frameworks (e.g. struts, spring mvc) and it is extremely hard to refactor them to page and component based ones. Also I see that frontend people are being used to work with JSP, freemarker etc. and are a bit hesitating to look at yet another templating technology. I really like tapestry concepts and helps a lot to think in different directions even if you don't use it in daily job. About tap-ioc I really like to java-code style injection and configuration instead for XML. - manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry Director of Open Source Technology at Formos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: [t:5.0.18] tapestry component id attribute value format
I have the same problem, and the easy way to solve it is to had new html
atribute to element like:
input t:type=textfield t:id=text1 field=fieldName /
after update:
input id=text1:120f2926924 name=text1 type=text field=fieldName
Then on the client side you can access to field using prototype api.
$$('input[field=fieldName]')
2009/4/29 Howard Lewis Ship hls...@gmail.com
That's a unique id injected into the client id as part of a partial page
update.
Use the TextField's getClientId() method, after it has rendered, to
determine what clientId was assigned to it.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:08 AM, roubaozi lagjazz.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
A tapestry component for example:
input t:type=textfield t:id=text1 /
after the component is rendered, it becomes something like:
input id=text1:120f2926924 name=text1 type=text
what is the number 120f2926924? how do I get this number from the client
side, for example if I need to set the value of this input field through
javascript, I would like to do something like:
$('text1').value = new value;
but how do I know the id of this element after it is rendered?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-t%3A5.0.18--tapestry-component-id-attribute-value-format-tp23296131p23296131.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
--
Cumprimentos...
Pedro Januário
Re: Solving the T5 Documentation Dilemma
I think a wiki is a decent option, but another option would be to make a /trunk/tapestry-ioc/ ... /trunk/tapestry-site/ ... project which could be versioned (or at least released) on a different cycle. This could keep (for any branch such as 5.0, 5.1) the docs as fresh as you wanted to release them. A second, orthogonal pattern is to generate site-documentation on a nightly build and put it up at a standard location, so anyone can check the nightly site docs. This could be matched by a nightly snapshot so the code matches the docs, for things like javadocs and component reports. Christian. On 29-Apr-09, at 19:02 , Howard Lewis Ship wrote: One of the issues with T5 documentation is that it is written in Maven APT format. This is better than HTML or even various XML docbook-lite kind of things, but it ties documentation down to the Tapestry release cycle. Perhaps it would be better if all documentation was moved onto a live wiki. This has the advantage that more people can work on it, beyond just the T5 committers. I don't think Tapestry's wiki, http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry, is up to the task. I've set up Confluence at Tapestry360: http://tapestry.formos.com/wiki/dashboard.action This is a more industrial strength wiki, better organized, good WYSIWYG editor, good support for images and attachments, and tons of features I don't know or understand yet. The downside of this is that it will be harder to correlate documentation against releases. We've seen this before, when I might publish on the list of the nightly docs some new features, and then a raft of errors about it not working come in. Also, I haven't had the bandwidth to validate the many notes and how-tos on the current Wiki. I'm not sure I would personally be able to do better on Confluence. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:31 PM, manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de wrote: Inge Solvoll schrieb: 1. What, politically, made it hard to introduce T5 in your organisation? Who resisted, and why? I am sure there a two things which could help at promotion for convincing decision makers: Real big live sites running under tapestry and a good up to date book. 2. What, technically, made it hard to introduce/teach T5 among your programmer colleagues? (some already mentioned documentation) As bigger sites hardly start from scratch, I see the legacy reason as a big technical point. Usually big codebases rely on action/command focused frameworks (e.g. struts, spring mvc) and it is extremely hard to refactor them to page and component based ones. Also I see that frontend people are being used to work with JSP, freemarker etc. and are a bit hesitating to look at yet another templating technology. I really like tapestry concepts and helps a lot to think in different directions even if you don't use it in daily job. About tap-ioc I really like to java-code style injection and configuration instead for XML. - manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry Director of Open Source Technology at Formos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org Christian Edward Gruber e-mail: christianedwardgru...@gmail.com weblog: http://www.geekinasuit.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Solving the T5 Documentation Dilemma
I'd also like to suggest that we add small usage examples into the .xdocs for the components themselves. This was what made NeXTSTEP documentation so nice. You'd have some decent usage documents right in the component reference, so I can go to the loop component reference and see six ways to use it. It would also go a long way to help people get good patterns. My search path is usually: Crap, gotta use some component, go to the reference... no good answer, go to the tutorial... to advanced, go to the cookbook... nothing, go to the wiki... sort of related page, go to the mailing lists... Because T5 is so component-oriented, shoring up the amount of information and context you can get directly in the component reference documentation would really short-circuit a lot of people's searching. cheers, Christian. On 29-Apr-09, at 19:02 , Howard Lewis Ship wrote: One of the issues with T5 documentation is that it is written in Maven APT format. This is better than HTML or even various XML docbook-lite kind of things, but it ties documentation down to the Tapestry release cycle. Perhaps it would be better if all documentation was moved onto a live wiki. This has the advantage that more people can work on it, beyond just the T5 committers. I don't think Tapestry's wiki, http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry, is up to the task. I've set up Confluence at Tapestry360: http://tapestry.formos.com/wiki/dashboard.action This is a more industrial strength wiki, better organized, good WYSIWYG editor, good support for images and attachments, and tons of features I don't know or understand yet. The downside of this is that it will be harder to correlate documentation against releases. We've seen this before, when I might publish on the list of the nightly docs some new features, and then a raft of errors about it not working come in. Also, I haven't had the bandwidth to validate the many notes and how-tos on the current Wiki. I'm not sure I would personally be able to do better on Confluence. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:31 PM, manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de wrote: Inge Solvoll schrieb: 1. What, politically, made it hard to introduce T5 in your organisation? Who resisted, and why? I am sure there a two things which could help at promotion for convincing decision makers: Real big live sites running under tapestry and a good up to date book. 2. What, technically, made it hard to introduce/teach T5 among your programmer colleagues? (some already mentioned documentation) As bigger sites hardly start from scratch, I see the legacy reason as a big technical point. Usually big codebases rely on action/command focused frameworks (e.g. struts, spring mvc) and it is extremely hard to refactor them to page and component based ones. Also I see that frontend people are being used to work with JSP, freemarker etc. and are a bit hesitating to look at yet another templating technology. I really like tapestry concepts and helps a lot to think in different directions even if you don't use it in daily job. About tap-ioc I really like to java-code style injection and configuration instead for XML. - manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry Director of Open Source Technology at Formos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org Christian Edward Gruber e-mail: christianedwardgru...@gmail.com weblog: http://www.geekinasuit.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: T5: What is NOT beautiful about Tapestry?
I'm working with tapestry for 6 months and my main problems were: - The lack of good documentation and common problems solutions documentation; - The static structure and dynamic behaviour need. Sometimes it's painfull when you need to have a reference for the component on the java code, when we want to have two exlusive blocks with the some field inside. 2009/4/29 manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de Inge Solvoll schrieb: 1. What, politically, made it hard to introduce T5 in your organisation? Who resisted, and why? I am sure there a two things which could help at promotion for convincing decision makers: Real big live sites running under tapestry and a good up to date book. 2. What, technically, made it hard to introduce/teach T5 among your programmer colleagues? (some already mentioned documentation) As bigger sites hardly start from scratch, I see the legacy reason as a big technical point. Usually big codebases rely on action/command focused frameworks (e.g. struts, spring mvc) and it is extremely hard to refactor them to page and component based ones. Also I see that frontend people are being used to work with JSP, freemarker etc. and are a bit hesitating to look at yet another templating technology. I really like tapestry concepts and helps a lot to think in different directions even if you don't use it in daily job. About tap-ioc I really like to java-code style injection and configuration instead for XML. - manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Cumprimentos... Pedro Januário
Re: T5: What is NOT beautiful about Tapestry?
I'm interested about this - can you elaborate what you mean by this? What about the structure is too static, and what dynamism are you looking for? Christian. On 29-Apr-09, at 19:16 , Pedro Januário wrote: - The static structure and dynamic behaviour need. Christian Edward Gruber e-mail: christianedwardgru...@gmail.com weblog: http://www.geekinasuit.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Solving the T5 Documentation Dilemma
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Christian Edward Gruber christianedwardgru...@gmail.com wrote: I think a wiki is a decent option, but another option would be to make a /trunk/tapestry-ioc/ ... /trunk/tapestry-site/ ... project which could be versioned (or at least released) on a different cycle. This could keep (for any branch such as 5.0, 5.1) the docs as fresh as you wanted to release them. This is how documentation is done today; it has the advantage that docs are implicitly synchornized to the code (as long as developers are dilligent about updating docs at the same time as code changes). It has the downside of being limited to just access by Tapestry committers. It might be possible for a wiki to operate in the same way ... we could have a Tapestry 5.1 space and, at the start of 5.2, we could copy it to form the Tapestry 5.2 space. In this way, the documentation for prior releases would be accurate (we could even freeze the space), but would still be open to a community effort to keep it up to date. A second, orthogonal pattern is to generate site-documentation on a nightly build and put it up at a standard location, so anyone can check the nightly site docs. This could be matched by a nightly snapshot so the code matches the docs, for things like javadocs and component reports. You mean, like we've been doing for the last couple of years? http://tapestry.formos.com/nightly/tapestry5 Christian. On 29-Apr-09, at 19:02 , Howard Lewis Ship wrote: One of the issues with T5 documentation is that it is written in Maven APT format. This is better than HTML or even various XML docbook-lite kind of things, but it ties documentation down to the Tapestry release cycle. Perhaps it would be better if all documentation was moved onto a live wiki. This has the advantage that more people can work on it, beyond just the T5 committers. I don't think Tapestry's wiki, http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry, is up to the task. I've set up Confluence at Tapestry360: http://tapestry.formos.com/wiki/dashboard.action This is a more industrial strength wiki, better organized, good WYSIWYG editor, good support for images and attachments, and tons of features I don't know or understand yet. The downside of this is that it will be harder to correlate documentation against releases. We've seen this before, when I might publish on the list of the nightly docs some new features, and then a raft of errors about it not working come in. Also, I haven't had the bandwidth to validate the many notes and how-tos on the current Wiki. I'm not sure I would personally be able to do better on Confluence. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:31 PM, manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de wrote: Inge Solvoll schrieb: 1. What, politically, made it hard to introduce T5 in your organisation? Who resisted, and why? I am sure there a two things which could help at promotion for convincing decision makers: Real big live sites running under tapestry and a good up to date book. 2. What, technically, made it hard to introduce/teach T5 among your programmer colleagues? (some already mentioned documentation) As bigger sites hardly start from scratch, I see the legacy reason as a big technical point. Usually big codebases rely on action/command focused frameworks (e.g. struts, spring mvc) and it is extremely hard to refactor them to page and component based ones. Also I see that frontend people are being used to work with JSP, freemarker etc. and are a bit hesitating to look at yet another templating technology. I really like tapestry concepts and helps a lot to think in different directions even if you don't use it in daily job. About tap-ioc I really like to java-code style injection and configuration instead for XML. - manuel aldana ald...@gmx.de software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry Director of Open Source Technology at Formos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org Christian Edward Gruber e-mail: christianedwardgru...@gmail.com weblog: http://www.geekinasuit.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry Director of Open Source Technology at Formos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: T5: What is NOT beautiful about Tapestry?
Ok, i will try to expose one of my issues. t:delegate t:to=activeMode/ t:block id=processFormFields_1 - Other fields select t:id=subject t:type=select t:model=prop:subjectModel t:value=prop:subject t:mixins=ck/OnEvent event=change onCompleteCallback=updateSubsubjects/ - Other fields /t:block t:block id=processFormFields_2 - Other fields select t:id=subject t:type=select t:model=prop:subjectModel t:value=prop:subject t:mixins=ck/OnEvent event=change onCompleteCallback=updateSubsubjects/ - Other fields /t:block The two blocks will never be displayed together, and i need the id of the component because i need to have component on the server side. I have solutionated my problem with a uggly solution. t:delegate t:to=activeMode/ t:block id=processFormFields_1 - Other fields t:delegate t:to=subjectBlock/ - Other fields /t:block t:block id=processFormFields_2 - Other fields t:delegate t:to=subjectBlock/ - Other fields /t:block t:block id=subjectBlock select t:id=subject t:type=select t:model=prop:subjectModel t:value=prop:subject t:mixins=ck/OnEvent event=change onCompleteCallback=updateSubsubjects/ /t:block This was one of the multiple times (and that i remember :D ) that i have faced this issue. I have worked with dynamic structure and liked that kind of behaviour but i know that dynamic structure my have some serious and dificult problems to solve. 2009/4/30 Christian Edward Gruber christianedwardgru...@gmail.com I'm interested about this - can you elaborate what you mean by this? What about the structure is too static, and what dynamism are you looking for? Christian. On 29-Apr-09, at 19:16 , Pedro Januário wrote: - The static structure and dynamic behaviour need. Christian Edward Gruber e-mail: christianedwardgru...@gmail.com weblog: http://www.geekinasuit.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Cumprimentos... Pedro Januário
Input validation issue
I would like to have this kind of behaviour:
t:textfield value=field validate=regexp=prop:fieldRegex /
public String getFieldRegex() {
return ^[a-z]+$;
}
or
t:textfield value=field validate=prop:fieldRegex /
public String getFieldRegex() {
return regexp=^[a-z]+$;
}
I know that it's possible to include regular expressions in the message
resources, but i would like to have a diferent source like database.
Are there any solution? I have looking way to solve this with contributions
but i think it's not possible.
Not the way it's implemented.
Having this kind of configuration it's possible to update the regular
expressions on real time and without a new deploy.
Anyone would like to have this improvement?
--
Cumprimentos...
Pedro Januário
Re: Solving the T5 Documentation Dilemma
LOL. You got me, Howard. Sorry. I have even visited them, but in my caffeine starved brain I forgot entirely. Christian. On Apr 29, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: A second, orthogonal pattern is to generate site-documentation on a nightly build and put it up at a standard location, so anyone can check the nightly site docs. This could be matched by a nightly snapshot so the code matches the docs, for things like javadocs and component reports. You mean, like we've been doing for the last couple of years? http://tapestry.formos.com/nightly/tapestry5 Christian Edward Gruber christianedwardgru...@gmail.com http://www.geekinasuit.com/
Re: Solving the T5 Documentation Dilemma
On Apr 29, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Christian Edward Gruber christianedwardgru...@gmail.com wrote: ... project which could be versioned (or at least released) on a different cycle. This could keep (for any branch such as 5.0, 5.1) the docs as fresh as you wanted to release them. This is how documentation is done today; it has the advantage that docs are implicitly synchornized to the code (as long as developers are dilligent about updating docs at the same time as code changes). It has the downside of being limited to just access by Tapestry committers. It might be possible for a wiki to operate in the same way ... we could have a Tapestry 5.1 space and, at the start of 5.2, we could copy it to form the Tapestry 5.2 space. In this way, the documentation for prior releases would be accurate (we could even freeze the space), but would still be open to a community effort to keep it up to date. I'm not sure that docs are any less important to have commit rights for than code. I think people should be submitting patches, or they should be committers. Or maybe someone wants to be a committer with focus on docs, to mediate the flow of community suggestions. I just think that the difference between published and contributed documentation is often quite high, and I think the information in contributed docs should end up in the published docs ultimately (if it's not redundant or irrelevant), I think having a little bit of a gate on the documentation would be good. Another option is to have an open repository where the docs live, and can be manipulated - a set of community-oriented docs in a different repo where more people can have commit rights. Then people can play with docs, and people can move them into the canonical docs as appropriate. I'm still caffeine starved, so I may be over-thinking this. Christian. Christian Edward Gruber christianedwardgru...@gmail.com http://www.geekinasuit.com/
Access unique clientId in AjaxFormLoop iteration
Each new iteration of AjaxFormLoop generated by an addRowLink event appends a
unique identifier to the clientId of elements in the form of -120f481f67e
Is it possible to access this value directly in order to pass it as a
parameter in onclick events for example?
Something like:
input t:type=checkbox t:value=rate.onMon t:clientId=weekday_0
onclick=javascript:doAllCheckboxToggle('${uniqueId}')/
such that after render we would have:
input type=checkbox id=weekday_0-120f481f67e
onclick=javascript:doAllCheckboxToggle('-120f481f67e')/
Any pointers gratefully received.
Thanks,
Andrew
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Access-unique-clientId-in-AjaxFormLoop-iteration-tp23304122p23304122.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Tapestry5 future compatiblity?
Hi, I am still deciding whether to choose Tapestry5 for my upcoming project. I was reading a lot how each version of Tapestry isn't backward compatible with older version and how migrating the code to new Tapestry is a nightmare. I like Tapestry declaractive model but my priority in choosing a framework is the ease of migrating to the newer version. So is there any information on regards to whether Tapestry 6 being rehauled again ? Is this the right time to step into Tapestry or should i wait till near GA release? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry5-future-compatiblity--tp23307803p23307803.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Tapestry5 future compatiblity?
Just search the archives for Tapestry 6 and see what you find. BTW, we're about to offer a stable release of 5.1 that adds huge new features with (near) perfect backwards compatibility. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:23 PM, sodium sodiu...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I am still deciding whether to choose Tapestry5 for my upcoming project. I was reading a lot how each version of Tapestry isn't backward compatible with older version and how migrating the code to new Tapestry is a nightmare. I like Tapestry declaractive model but my priority in choosing a framework is the ease of migrating to the newer version. So is there any information on regards to whether Tapestry 6 being rehauled again ? Is this the right time to step into Tapestry or should i wait till near GA release? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry5-future-compatiblity--tp23307803p23307803.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry Director of Open Source Technology at Formos - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
