Re: CMS Integration

2006-12-18 Thread Igor Bljahhin

Hi!

Can we talk on Gtalk or something? Actually, I don't have much code, just
one-two classes...

Igor

On 12/14/06, Borut Bolčina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi Igor,

I am planning to integrate Tapestry with some portal and CMS solutions
available commercially or in open source form. Accessing content
repository
like Apache Jackrabbit via Tapestry components (and/or portlets) seems a
goal to pursue. I am very interested in your work so far. Can you please
share some info on your solutions?

Regards,
Borut

2006/9/5, soir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


 Hello,

 I work on the integration of Jackrabbit repository with Tapestry. So
far,
 I
 have
 implemented the loading of localized assets from CMS and now I am
working
 on
 the
 loading of message files from CMS.

 Igor
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/OT%3A-Tacos-issues-tf1875199.html#a6148924
 Sent from the Tapestry - User forum at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: CMS Integration

2006-12-14 Thread Borut Bolčina

Hi Igor,

I am planning to integrate Tapestry with some portal and CMS solutions
available commercially or in open source form. Accessing content repository
like Apache Jackrabbit via Tapestry components (and/or portlets) seems a
goal to pursue. I am very interested in your work so far. Can you please
share some info on your solutions?

Regards,
Borut

2006/9/5, soir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:



Hello,

I work on the integration of Jackrabbit repository with Tapestry. So far,
I
have
implemented the loading of localized assets from CMS and now I am working
on
the
loading of message files from CMS.

Igor
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OT%3A-Tacos-issues-tf1875199.html#a6148924
Sent from the Tapestry - User forum at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: CMS Integration

2006-09-05 Thread soir

Hello,

I work on the integration of Jackrabbit repository with Tapestry. So far, I
have
implemented the loading of localized assets from CMS and now I am working on
the
loading of message files from CMS.

Igor
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/OT%3A-Tacos-issues-tf1875199.html#a6148924
Sent from the Tapestry - User forum at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CMS Integration

2006-07-12 Thread Lutz Hühnken

Simeon,

it would of course be great if you'd provide your code.

I wasn't aware you had already done some work in the area, only today
by means of google I read your posting from november 05. What is the
status of your code? Is it currently in use with alfresco? Have you
tried it with other JCRs, such as jackrabbit? Is it available for
download anywhere? Apparently, there is a handful of people interested
in JCR access through Tapestry, so I think we should set something up.

If it wasn't for you mail, I would have created a tapestry-jcr
sourceforge project
and would have started working on the functionality your code
apparently provides. I have little time to spare for it, though, so to
start of with already working code would give it quite a
boost. But I don't want to steal your project from you - maybe you
want to turn it into a sourceforge project yourself? I'm sure people
will use those components and you'll get a lot of credit for it.

Well, if you don't, let me know. In that case I'll be happy to start a
project based on your implementation.

Regards,

Lutz

On 7/10/06, Simeon Koptelov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Oh, if you're interested in it, I can give my code for JCR integration as a
base :)

2006/7/9, Lutz Hühnken [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi,

 I haven't really looked at it, but I was wondering... as far as I
 understand, you'd like to integrate CMS-managed content into a
 Tapestry-based site.

 You mention Magnolia... afaik, Magnolia uses a JSR 170 compliant
 content repository, such as Apache Jackrabbit
 (http://jackrabbit.apache.org/;), to store the content.
 It provides a number of JSP tags to access that content from within
 your page templates
 (http://magnolia.sourceforge.net/30/taglib/intro.html;).

 It seems getting content out of Jackrabbit is not all that hard. So
 here's my idea: Why don't we start a project to build some Tapestry
 components to access content repositories that conform with JSR 170? A
 possible approach could be to re-implement the Magnolia JSP taglib, or
 parts of it, as Tapestry components. Or maybe Stitches could be used
 as a starting point.

 This way, I would think, you could use any JSR 170 compliant CMS to
 manage your content, and could integrate the content in a Tapestry
 based site using this new component library.

 What do people think? Is that realistic? Would it work? Would such a
 component library be of interest to anyone?

 Lutz


 On 7/1/06, Mike Grundvig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Has anyone integrated any sort of CMS tool with Tapestry? I've looked
 into
  Magnolia and several others, but all seem to require an uphill battle if
  they are to be tied into Tapestry and I was wondering if someone else
 has
  already done this. Thanks!
 
  Michael Grundvig

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CMS Integration

2006-07-10 Thread wouter.cleuren
a common CMS component library would be a very nice feature/add-on:
 - not re-invent the wheel 
 - growing market need 
 - Tapestry will 'sell' more/better
 - ...

I'm interested in contributing/developing on this topic!

greetz


-Original Message-
From: Simeon Koptelov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: maandag 10 juli 2006 7:30
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: CMS Integration

Oh, if you're interested in it, I can give my code for JCR integration as a
base :)

2006/7/9, Lutz Hühnken [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi,

 I haven't really looked at it, but I was wondering... as far as I
 understand, you'd like to integrate CMS-managed content into a
 Tapestry-based site.

 You mention Magnolia... afaik, Magnolia uses a JSR 170 compliant
 content repository, such as Apache Jackrabbit
 (http://jackrabbit.apache.org/;), to store the content.
 It provides a number of JSP tags to access that content from within
 your page templates
 (http://magnolia.sourceforge.net/30/taglib/intro.html;).

 It seems getting content out of Jackrabbit is not all that hard. So
 here's my idea: Why don't we start a project to build some Tapestry
 components to access content repositories that conform with JSR 170? A
 possible approach could be to re-implement the Magnolia JSP taglib, or
 parts of it, as Tapestry components. Or maybe Stitches could be used
 as a starting point.

 This way, I would think, you could use any JSR 170 compliant CMS to
 manage your content, and could integrate the content in a Tapestry
 based site using this new component library.

 What do people think? Is that realistic? Would it work? Would such a
 component library be of interest to anyone?

 Lutz


 On 7/1/06, Mike Grundvig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Has anyone integrated any sort of CMS tool with Tapestry? I've looked
 into
  Magnolia and several others, but all seem to require an uphill battle if
  they are to be tied into Tapestry and I was wondering if someone else
 has
  already done this. Thanks!
 
  Michael Grundvig

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CMS Integration

2006-07-10 Thread Julio C. Rivera

I think a CMS component library is a very good idea. I'm searching something
like it.
I'm trying Stitches, but I'm having some problems building and deploying
examples.

2006/7/10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


a common CMS component library would be a very nice feature/add-on:
- not re-invent the wheel
- growing market need
- Tapestry will 'sell' more/better
- ...

I'm interested in contributing/developing on this topic!

greetz


-Original Message-
From: Simeon Koptelov [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: maandag 10 juli 2006 7:30
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: CMS Integration

Oh, if you're interested in it, I can give my code for JCR integration as
a
base :)

2006/7/9, Lutz Hühnken [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi,

 I haven't really looked at it, but I was wondering... as far as I
 understand, you'd like to integrate CMS-managed content into a
 Tapestry-based site.

 You mention Magnolia... afaik, Magnolia uses a JSR 170 compliant
 content repository, such as Apache Jackrabbit
 (http://jackrabbit.apache.org/;), to store the content.
 It provides a number of JSP tags to access that content from within
 your page templates
 (http://magnolia.sourceforge.net/30/taglib/intro.html;).

 It seems getting content out of Jackrabbit is not all that hard. So
 here's my idea: Why don't we start a project to build some Tapestry
 components to access content repositories that conform with JSR 170? A
 possible approach could be to re-implement the Magnolia JSP taglib, or
 parts of it, as Tapestry components. Or maybe Stitches could be used
 as a starting point.

 This way, I would think, you could use any JSR 170 compliant CMS to
 manage your content, and could integrate the content in a Tapestry
 based site using this new component library.

 What do people think? Is that realistic? Would it work? Would such a
 component library be of interest to anyone?

 Lutz


 On 7/1/06, Mike Grundvig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Has anyone integrated any sort of CMS tool with Tapestry? I've looked
 into
  Magnolia and several others, but all seem to require an uphill battle
if
  they are to be tied into Tapestry and I was wondering if someone else
 has
  already done this. Thanks!
 
  Michael Grundvig

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: CMS Integration

2006-07-10 Thread spamsucks

Julio C. Rivera wrote:

I think a CMS component library is a very good idea. I'm searching 
something

like it.
I'm trying Stitches, but I'm having some problems building and deploying
examples.

2006/7/10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:



a common CMS component library would be a very nice feature/add-on:
- not re-invent the wheel
- growing market need
- Tapestry will 'sell' more/better
- ...

I'm interested in contributing/developing on this topic!

greetz


-Original Message-
From: Simeon Koptelov [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: maandag 10 juli 2006 7:30
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: CMS Integration

Oh, if you're interested in it, I can give my code for JCR 
integration as

a
base :)

2006/7/9, Lutz Hühnken [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi,

 I haven't really looked at it, but I was wondering... as far as I
 understand, you'd like to integrate CMS-managed content into a
 Tapestry-based site.

 You mention Magnolia... afaik, Magnolia uses a JSR 170 compliant
 content repository, such as Apache Jackrabbit
 (http://jackrabbit.apache.org/;), to store the content.
 It provides a number of JSP tags to access that content from within
 your page templates
 (http://magnolia.sourceforge.net/30/taglib/intro.html;).

 It seems getting content out of Jackrabbit is not all that hard. So
 here's my idea: Why don't we start a project to build some Tapestry
 components to access content repositories that conform with JSR 170? A
 possible approach could be to re-implement the Magnolia JSP taglib, or
 parts of it, as Tapestry components. Or maybe Stitches could be used
 as a starting point.

 This way, I would think, you could use any JSR 170 compliant CMS to
 manage your content, and could integrate the content in a Tapestry
 based site using this new component library.

 What do people think? Is that realistic? Would it work? Would such a
 component library be of interest to anyone?

 Lutz


 On 7/1/06, Mike Grundvig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Has anyone integrated any sort of CMS tool with Tapestry? I've 
looked

 into
  Magnolia and several others, but all seem to require an uphill 
battle

if
  they are to be tied into Tapestry and I was wondering if someone 
else

 has
  already done this. Thanks!
 
  Michael Grundvig

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]








-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CMS Integration

2006-07-09 Thread Simeon Koptelov

Oh, if you're interested in it, I can give my code for JCR integration as a
base :)

2006/7/9, Lutz Hühnken [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Hi,

I haven't really looked at it, but I was wondering... as far as I
understand, you'd like to integrate CMS-managed content into a
Tapestry-based site.

You mention Magnolia... afaik, Magnolia uses a JSR 170 compliant
content repository, such as Apache Jackrabbit
(http://jackrabbit.apache.org/;), to store the content.
It provides a number of JSP tags to access that content from within
your page templates
(http://magnolia.sourceforge.net/30/taglib/intro.html;).

It seems getting content out of Jackrabbit is not all that hard. So
here's my idea: Why don't we start a project to build some Tapestry
components to access content repositories that conform with JSR 170? A
possible approach could be to re-implement the Magnolia JSP taglib, or
parts of it, as Tapestry components. Or maybe Stitches could be used
as a starting point.

This way, I would think, you could use any JSR 170 compliant CMS to
manage your content, and could integrate the content in a Tapestry
based site using this new component library.

What do people think? Is that realistic? Would it work? Would such a
component library be of interest to anyone?

Lutz


On 7/1/06, Mike Grundvig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Has anyone integrated any sort of CMS tool with Tapestry? I've looked
into
 Magnolia and several others, but all seem to require an uphill battle if
 they are to be tied into Tapestry and I was wondering if someone else
has
 already done this. Thanks!

 Michael Grundvig

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: CMS Integration

2006-07-06 Thread Mike Grundvig
I left this vague to allow any sort of response. Basically, the closer it 
gets to something like Magnolia the better but anything someone else has 
done would be a start.


Michael Grundvig
Electrotank, Inc
http://www.electrotank.com


- Original Message - 
From: Phillip Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: CMS Integration



What are the basic requirements? CMS is a many-faceted beast.



Has anyone integrated any sort of CMS tool with Tapestry? I've looked 
into

Magnolia and several others, but all seem to require an uphill battle if
they are to be tied into Tapestry and I was wondering if someone else has
already done this. Thanks!

Michael Grundvig



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CMS Integration

2006-07-06 Thread Phillip Rhodes
Michael,
The tapestry library that I developed (called stitches) has some cms
functionality.  It is a suite of tapestry components that provide
creation,modify, search (using lucene) of a repository.  The idea when I
started stitches was to make it so stitches could work with
jackrabbit,alfresco, etc. using the java cms api.  However, as projects
go, I found it quicker to just write the content out to the filesystem
finish the project.

Since all access to the repository is through an interface, and I have a
prevayler and hibernate based implementation, it would not be too
difficult to implement one for jackrabbit or some other cms api.

The basic problem that I was trying to solve with my library is that there
are different business objects (e.g. products, categories) that need to
have  content associated to them (could be a pdf, html).  This library
gave me a reusable means by which to associate these content items to the
business objects.  For example, one application that I have allows users
to upload and share images.  The images get uploaded to the stitch repo
and everyone can search the repo and use the images to build flash
galleries or associated the images with biz objects (their businesses, or
roadtrips, etc).

Let me know if there is anything would you find useful.  I may be willing
to  do some coding around implementing a jackrabbit (or other) cms to
stitches if I had someone to help out.
Thanks
Phillip

 I left this vague to allow any sort of response. Basically, the closer it
 gets to something like Magnolia the better but anything someone else has
 done would be a start.

 Michael Grundvig
 Electrotank, Inc
 http://www.electrotank.com


 - Original Message -
 From: Phillip Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tapestry users users@tapestry.apache.org
 Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 10:59 AM
 Subject: Re: CMS Integration


 What are the basic requirements? CMS is a many-faceted beast.



 Has anyone integrated any sort of CMS tool with Tapestry? I've looked
 into
 Magnolia and several others, but all seem to require an uphill battle
 if
 they are to be tied into Tapestry and I was wondering if someone else
 has
 already done this. Thanks!

 Michael Grundvig



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CMS Integration

2006-07-05 Thread Phillip Rhodes
What are the basic requirements? CMS is a many-faceted beast.



 Has anyone integrated any sort of CMS tool with Tapestry? I've looked into
 Magnolia and several others, but all seem to require an uphill battle if
 they are to be tied into Tapestry and I was wondering if someone else has
 already done this. Thanks!

 Michael Grundvig



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]