Syncing Versions with Dropbox

2009-07-30 Thread bhubbard

Has anyone synced versions on multiple computers using Dropbox? If so
can you provide the steps needed?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Problem with umlaut characters like ö,ä,ü

2009-07-30 Thread moom

Maybe the authors of Versions could add a possibility whereby one
could use the already installed subversion client in stead of a
subversion library that is included in the versions application.

The solution from Andrew solves my problem on the command line (sudo
port install subversion +unicode_path).

If Versions would use the svn library that I hence installed it could
also solve the issue in Versions. I can live with the consequences (we
don't have a mac only repository).

Kind regards,
Bart

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Snow Leopard Beta

2009-07-30 Thread Koen Bok

Hi everyone,

We fixed Versions to play nice with Snow Leopard. It's beta, so there
might be some small issues. Please let us know in this thread or mail
support.

http://www.versionsapp.com/beta

Enjoy!

- Koen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Snow Leopard Beta

2009-07-30 Thread Koen Bok

Hi everyone,

We fixed Versions to play nice with Snow Leopard. I's beta, so there
might be some small issues. Please let us know in this thread or mail
support.

http://www.versionsapp.com/beta

Enjoy!

- Koen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: What's going on here?

2009-07-30 Thread Rob Lewis

You nailed it, Ray. Thanks!

How does one do svn copy within Versions?

On Jul 27, 11:42 am, Ray  wrote:
> Did you use the Finder to copy the already version controlled folder
> "Valid", along with the hidden .svn directory within it?  If you didn't use
> the svn copy command from within Versions, you're sure to confuse svn
> because the .svn directory contains the old "Valid" directory's
> meta-information, but now it's in a differently named directory.
> If this is what happened, you mucked up your working copy: I would
> check out a new working copy and reverse merge to before the version
> where you copied the Valid directory
> to ValidfFXL.  Then I would commit that — this reverts the repo to before
> you made the mistake.  Then, use Versions to make a copy of Valid and rename
> it to ValidfFXL, and do all your changes and commit.
>
> -Ray
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Rob Lewis  wrote:
>
> > I have a folder caled "Valid" in my repository.
> > I copied the local copy of the folder into my local copy of the
> > repository, and named the copy "Valid fFXL". I added some more files
> > to this new folder and renamed most of the others. I committed it to
> > the repository.
>
> > Now, somehow, the original "Valid" folder has been populated with the
> > new files from the "Valid fFXL" folder, and there is a question mark
> > next to the "Valid fFXL" folder in Versions' browser. I can't get rid
> > of this question mark. If I try to Add it, I get a message that it is
> > already under version control. If I try Force Add, the question mark
> > disappears briefly, then reappears.
>
> > How can I revert the "Valid" folder to its original state without the
> > added files? When I try to revert, nothing happens.
>
> > How did those new files get in the "Valid" folder anyway?
>
> > And why do I have the persistent question mark next to "Valid fFXL"?
>
> > It's kind of looking like Versions is as confused as I am. I'm using
> > version 1.0.4/65.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Snow Leopard Beta

2009-07-30 Thread Quinn Taylor
I was of the impression that it worked fine on SL — I'm running the  
beta and hadn't run into any issues.  :-)  Is there a list of fixes we  
can/should verify?


- Quinn

On Jul 30, 2009, at 6:01 AM, Koen Bok wrote:



Hi everyone,

We fixed Versions to play nice with Snow Leopard. I's beta, so there
might be some small issues. Please let us know in this thread or mail
support.

http://www.versionsapp.com/beta

Enjoy!

- Koen


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: What's going on here?

2009-07-30 Thread Ray
Glad I could help.  In Versions you can copy the same way as in the Finder.
Just hold option while you drag.  When you let go, it will ask you for a new
name for the copy.
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/ch04s04.html Here's the part of the svn
book that explains merging and reverse merging.  You'll have to do that from
the command line.

-Ray

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Rob Lewis  wrote:

>
> You nailed it, Ray. Thanks!
>
> How does one do svn copy within Versions?
>
> On Jul 27, 11:42 am, Ray  wrote:
> > Did you use the Finder to copy the already version controlled folder
> > "Valid", along with the hidden .svn directory within it?  If you didn't
> use
> > the svn copy command from within Versions, you're sure to confuse svn
> > because the .svn directory contains the old "Valid" directory's
> > meta-information, but now it's in a differently named directory.
> > If this is what happened, you mucked up your working copy: I would
> > check out a new working copy and reverse merge to before the version
> > where you copied the Valid directory
> > to ValidfFXL.  Then I would commit that — this reverts the repo to before
> > you made the mistake.  Then, use Versions to make a copy of Valid and
> rename
> > it to ValidfFXL, and do all your changes and commit.
> >
> > -Ray
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Rob Lewis  wrote:
> >
> > > I have a folder caled "Valid" in my repository.
> > > I copied the local copy of the folder into my local copy of the
> > > repository, and named the copy "Valid fFXL". I added some more files
> > > to this new folder and renamed most of the others. I committed it to
> > > the repository.
> >
> > > Now, somehow, the original "Valid" folder has been populated with the
> > > new files from the "Valid fFXL" folder, and there is a question mark
> > > next to the "Valid fFXL" folder in Versions' browser. I can't get rid
> > > of this question mark. If I try to Add it, I get a message that it is
> > > already under version control. If I try Force Add, the question mark
> > > disappears briefly, then reappears.
> >
> > > How can I revert the "Valid" folder to its original state without the
> > > added files? When I try to revert, nothing happens.
> >
> > > How did those new files get in the "Valid" folder anyway?
> >
> > > And why do I have the persistent question mark next to "Valid fFXL"?
> >
> > > It's kind of looking like Versions is as confused as I am. I'm using
> > > version 1.0.4/65.
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Snow Leopard Beta

2009-07-30 Thread CodeWarrior

Quinn, Hi! Do you remenber me!? :) What is your experience with SL?  
Are you seeing a true difference or everything its just propaganda?

Thankx!

--
The Future Begins Today




Em 30/07/2009, às 13:15, Quinn Taylor escreveu:

> I was of the impression that it worked fine on SL — I'm running the  
> beta and hadn't run into any issues.  :-)  Is there a list of fixes  
> we can/should verify?
>
> - Quinn
>
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 6:01 AM, Koen Bok wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> We fixed Versions to play nice with Snow Leopard. I's beta, so there
>> might be some small issues. Please let us know in this thread or mail
>> support.
>>
>> http://www.versionsapp.com/beta
>>
>> Enjoy!
>>
>> - Koen


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Snow Leopard Beta

2009-07-30 Thread Koen Bok

Hey Quinn,

Ha, that's interesting. We would like to, but the NDA prohibits
talking about some of it. Let's say it was around "viewing things
fast" :-)

The core was indeed running fine, but we tweaked some included library
linking (libcrypto), build against the 10.6 SDK and fixed some memory
issues as suggested by the static analyzer.

- Koen

On Jul 30, 5:15 pm, Quinn Taylor  wrote:
> I was of the impression that it worked fine on SL — I'm running the  
> beta and hadn't run into any issues.  :-)  Is there a list of fixes we  
> can/should verify?
>
> - Quinn
>
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 6:01 AM, Koen Bok wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi everyone,
>
> > We fixed Versions to play nice with Snow Leopard. I's beta, so there
> > might be some small issues. Please let us know in this thread or mail
> > support.
>
> >http://www.versionsapp.com/beta
>
> > Enjoy!
>
> > - Koen
>
>
>
>  smime.p7s
> 3KViewDownload
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: What's going on here?

2009-07-30 Thread Koen Bok

Hey guys,

We realize option-drag is not that widely known as we expected, and
we're working on making that better.

- Koen

On Jul 30, 6:42 pm, Ray  wrote:
> Glad I could help.  In Versions you can copy the same way as in the Finder.
> Just hold option while you drag.  When you let go, it will ask you for a new
> name for the copy.http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/ch04s04.htmlHere's the 
> part of the svn
> book that explains merging and reverse merging.  You'll have to do that from
> the command line.
>
> -Ray
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Rob Lewis  wrote:
>
> > You nailed it, Ray. Thanks!
>
> > How does one do svn copy within Versions?
>
> > On Jul 27, 11:42 am, Ray  wrote:
> > > Did you use the Finder to copy the already version controlled folder
> > > "Valid", along with the hidden .svn directory within it?  If you didn't
> > use
> > > the svn copy command from within Versions, you're sure to confuse svn
> > > because the .svn directory contains the old "Valid" directory's
> > > meta-information, but now it's in a differently named directory.
> > > If this is what happened, you mucked up your working copy: I would
> > > check out a new working copy and reverse merge to before the version
> > > where you copied the Valid directory
> > > to ValidfFXL.  Then I would commit that — this reverts the repo to before
> > > you made the mistake.  Then, use Versions to make a copy of Valid and
> > rename
> > > it to ValidfFXL, and do all your changes and commit.
>
> > > -Ray
>
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Rob Lewis  wrote:
>
> > > > I have a folder caled "Valid" in my repository.
> > > > I copied the local copy of the folder into my local copy of the
> > > > repository, and named the copy "Valid fFXL". I added some more files
> > > > to this new folder and renamed most of the others. I committed it to
> > > > the repository.
>
> > > > Now, somehow, the original "Valid" folder has been populated with the
> > > > new files from the "Valid fFXL" folder, and there is a question mark
> > > > next to the "Valid fFXL" folder in Versions' browser. I can't get rid
> > > > of this question mark. If I try to Add it, I get a message that it is
> > > > already under version control. If I try Force Add, the question mark
> > > > disappears briefly, then reappears.
>
> > > > How can I revert the "Valid" folder to its original state without the
> > > > added files? When I try to revert, nothing happens.
>
> > > > How did those new files get in the "Valid" folder anyway?
>
> > > > And why do I have the persistent question mark next to "Valid fFXL"?
>
> > > > It's kind of looking like Versions is as confused as I am. I'm using
> > > > version 1.0.4/65.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Snow Leopard Beta

2009-07-30 Thread Gary L. Gray


On Jul 30, 2009, at 9:01 AM, Koen Bok wrote:

>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We fixed Versions to play nice with Snow Leopard. I's beta, so there
> might be some small issues. Please let us know in this thread or mail
> support.
>
> http://www.versionsapp.com/beta
>
> Enjoy!
>
> - Koen


Koen,

Does this beta add any features we have been clamoring for or does it  
fix any problems we have been experiencing? In particular does it  
allow us to fix the size of columns and/or does it fix the problem of  
lots of stuff being written to the Console (e.g., 7/30/09 12:09:57 PM  
Versions[42527] No worthy mechs found)?

Thank you.

-- 
Gary L. Gray
Associate Professor & Undergraduate Officer
Engineering Science & Mechanics
Penn State
212 Earth & Engineering Sciences Bldg.
University Park, PA 16802-6812
USA
E-mail: g...@engr.psu.edu
Office: (814) 863-1778
Mobile: (814) 883-4308

() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\ Help Cure HTML Email



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Snow Leopard Beta

2009-07-30 Thread Quinn Taylor
My experience has been that it's full of pleasant little improvements  
for end users, though the real improvements are under the hood, and  
will be unleashed by degrees as developers leverage the powerful new  
technologies. The Finder is definitely smoother and more polished, and  
there are numerous other little touches. I think you'll definitely  
find it worth the small investment. :-)


 - Quinn

On Jul 30, 2009, at 11:42 AM, CodeWarrior wrote:



Quinn, Hi! Do you remenber me!? :) What is your experience with SL?
Are you seeing a true difference or everything its just propaganda?

Thankx!

--
The Future Begins Today




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Snow Leopard Beta

2009-07-30 Thread CodeWarrior

Oh Yeah! Thankx!

Obrigado.

--
The Future Begins Today




Em 30/07/2009, às 20:07, Quinn Taylor escreveu:

> My experience has been that it's full of pleasant little  
> improvements for end users, though the real improvements are under  
> the hood, and will be unleashed by degrees as developers leverage  
> the powerful new technologies. The Finder is definitely smoother and  
> more polished, and there are numerous other little touches. I think  
> you'll definitely find it worth the small investment. :-)
>
> - Quinn
>
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 11:42 AM, CodeWarrior wrote:
>
>>
>> Quinn, Hi! Do you remenber me!? :) What is your experience with SL?
>> Are you seeing a true difference or everything its just propaganda?
>>
>> Thankx!
>>
>> --
>> The Future Begins Today
>


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---