Re: [videoblogging] FlashMeeting presentations+interviews

2007-01-18 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
that's an excellent idea, Enric,

would the meetings be available retrospectively as well? this would be
a wonderful resource for those of us studying this stuff...

best

trine



On 1/18/07, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Crumbs: [EMAIL PROTECTED] isn't a member of this list
>  and notifications bounce.
>
>  Back to the drawing board.
>
>  Writing to Susan who owns the vlogger calendar for perms.
>
>  Jan
>
>  On 1/18/07, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I concur and would gleefully participate in such a thing - I'm the Faux
> Press after all :)
>  >
>  > Jan
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > On 1/17/07, Robyn Tippins < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Sounds good to me. I would love to hear from some of you who've been
> doing
>  > > this a long time.
>  > >
>  > > Robyn
>  > >
>  > > From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > On Behalf Of Enric
>  > > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:39 PM
>  > > To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>  > > Subject: [videoblogging] FlashMeeting presentations+interviews
>  > >
>  > > I would like to set up some of the FlashMeetings for people to
>  > > present, talk about what they're doing and answer questions. For
>  > > examples, Casey and Rudy could talk about how they came about with
>  > > Galacticast, how it's been going, future plans and such. People could
>  > > ask question about animation techniques and such. Bre could talk
>  > > about his philosophy of making and modifying objects. Michael Verdi
>  > > could talk about freevlog and the projects he's know involved in. Jay
>  > > Dedman could talk about the history of videoblogging and the new
>  > > things he's doing like swajana.com. And so forth.
>  > >
>  > > I think that format could make those FlashMeetings valuable and
>  > > interesting. I'm thinking the Saturday FlashMeetings would be good
>  > > for this since people are likely more available to come in on
>  > > Saturdays rather than the Tuesday FlashMeetings. This would probably
>  > > not be every FlashMeeting, only ones where people setup to present.
>  > > What do you think?
>  > >
>  > > -- Enric
>  > > -==-
>  > > http://www.cirne.com
>  > >
>  > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > The Faux Press - better than real
>  > http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
>
>  --
>  The Faux Press - better than real
>  http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
>  


-- 

+ http://www.davidandtrine.org +


Re: [videoblogging] Is Creative Commons just bullshit?

2007-01-30 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
Jay, you might find this interesting.

http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/commons_without_commonality/

Trine




On 1/29/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> LucasGonze said:
>  > The problem is that videobloggers are going down the same hopelessly
>  > unrealistic and ultimately disastrous path as the record labels and
>  > movie companies. What's driving you is the same misplaced sense of
>  > victimization and and righteous anger.
>  > Creators don't have sacrosanct rights in the US (except with regard to
>  > attribution). That's not just a little wrong, it's wrong in a way
>  > which is important. If creators were to be granted sacrosanct rights
>  > it would be a massive expansion of copyright at the expense of the
>  > public.
>  > And not just at the expense of the public, but also at the expense of
>  > creators. The 500,000 YouTubers who you want to prevent from mashing
>  > up your video have just as much right to make art as you do. If
>  > what's at stake is the loss of 500,000 artworks, why does your work
>  > trump theirs?
>
>  I agree that we can always tone down the outrage and drama when
>  discussing these aggregator sites that grab our videos...but let's not
>  lose sight of the real subject here.
>
>  CreativeCommons.org
>  is this just a noble experiment?
>  or is CC a real tool that can help make the web a healthy place.
>
>  Lucas, all I ask of MyHeavy.com, Magnify.net or any other site is that
>  they respect the CC license I have on my video. If they are pulling in
>  the Blip.tv feedthey can very well read the license in the feed.
>
>  Most videos I have are CC-Attribution
>  (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/).
>  Its very clear that anyone can put this on their site, remix, even use
>  commerically.
>  but they must link back to me.
>  period.
>
>  If I have an attribution-noncommerical license
>  (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), then any site should
>  respect this accordingly and not put ads around my video.
>  None of this is difficult to understand.
>  the question is...will these aggregators sites respect or not.
>
>  Lucas, I know you did a lot of work for CCmixter.org.
>  its an awesome place where people can put up music for sharing.
>  To use any of these songs, all most artists require is attribution.
>  But if I make a site, list of these songs and act like I wrote
>  themwhat kind of ecology are we creating? Instead of people
>  wanting to share their work, it'll just make people feel ripped off.
>
>  the only issue I have with Youtube.com and other similar sites is that
>  they do not allow creators to put a CC license on point of upload.
>  They help break the ecology. Nothing is clear. Confusion is ripe. A
>  lawyers dream.
>
>  So Lucas, I am not crying.
>  i want anyone to link to my videos, just give me a linkback.
>  Its so easy to do technically.
>  The difficulty here is sorting out people's motives and awareness.
>  If a funded company is building a business by grabbing content without
>  attribution, its simply ignorance, maliciousness, or laziness.
>  I would love for the Videoblogging Group to at least be able to
>  educate so we eradicate the Ignorance. Then its up to each site to
>  choose where they stand with the community.
>
>  is Creative Commons a noble experiment, or is it a real tool to help
>  create a healthy online ecology?
>
>  jay
>
>  --
>  Here I am
>  http://jaydedman.com
>  


-- 

+ http://www.davidandtrine.org +


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyrights Laws for using Music in Video

2007-02-16 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
locarecords.com releases copyleft as well.

On 2/15/07, Diana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Another good source is OpSound.org. All their music is under
>  CC-Attribution-ShareAlike.
>
>  Diana
>
>  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Nick Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
>  >
>  > Does anyone know anything about the law about using popular bands
>  > music in your videos?
>  >
>  > Do you have to source the band and titled of the song?
>  >
>  > What does the RIAA think about it?
>  >
>  > What do we have to do to make it legit? or can we?
>  >
>  >
>  > Nick Schmidt
>  >
>
>  


-- 


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com


Re: [videoblogging] Re: New London Videoblog Group at Meetup.com

2007-02-28 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
argh you had to wait till I moved hundred miles away into the
countryside.. :-(

but i am very interested.

trine :)

On 2/28/07, Roxanne Darling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Let us know here when you fix a time and I'll add it to the
>  Videoblogging calendar, which is very USA-centric these days...
>
>  Aloha,
>
>  Rox
>
>  On 2/27/07, Mark Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Nice one for organising this Rupert. I'll be there for sure.
>  >
>  > Mark
>  >
>  > --
>  > Mark Smith
>  > "digital cinema, documentary making and the web"
>  >
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > http://www.dcinput.com
>  >
>  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>  >
>  >
>
>  --
>  Roxanne Darling
>  "o ke kai" means "of the sea" in hawaiian
>  808-384-5554
>
>  http://www.beachwalks.tv
>  http://www.barefeetshop.com
>  http://www.barefeetstudios.com
>  http://www.inthetransition.com
>  


-- 


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com


Re: [videoblogging] Re: New London Videoblog Group at Meetup.com

2007-02-28 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
>  Also, there are a few vloggers out west - I think Duncan's still
>  there, and there are bound to be more that aren't listed on Vlogmap -
>  I see you're still shown down in Brighton as A Doll's House...
>  Rupert

ah yes, i seem to have misplaced my login details, so will get that
changed... it's quite mad, I haven't been there since i registered and
it's grown SO MUCH!

T

>
>
>  On 28 Feb 2007, at 09:28, trine bjørkmann berry wrote:
>
>  argh you had to wait till I moved hundred miles away into the
>  countryside.. :-(
>
>  but i am very interested.
>
>  trine :)
>
>  On 2/28/07, Roxanne Darling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Let us know here when you fix a time and I'll add it to the
>  > Videoblogging calendar, which is very USA-centric these days...
>  >
>  > Aloha,
>  >
>  > Rox
>  >
>  > On 2/27/07, Mark Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Nice one for organising this Rupert. I'll be there for sure.
>  > >
>  > > Mark
>  > >
>  > > --
>  > > Mark Smith
>  > > "digital cinema, documentary making and the web"
>  > >
>  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > http://www.dcinput.com
>  > >
>  > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Roxanne Darling
>  > "o ke kai" means "of the sea" in hawaiian
>  > 808-384-5554
>  >
>  > http://www.beachwalks.tv
>  > http://www.barefeetshop.com
>  > http://www.barefeetstudios.com
>  > http://www.inthetransition.com
>  >
>
>  --
>
>  
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  trine.blogs.com
>
>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>  


-- 


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com


Re: [videoblogging] Re: New London Videoblog Group at Meetup.com

2007-02-28 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
>
>  You guys are coming to vlogeurope in september. No wedding and no moving
>  excuses this year. :o)

you'll be the death of me Andreas the 7th is my birthday.. I am
supposed to be in Norway then. Where is it again this year?? Germany
somewhere?

T




>  - Andreas
>
>  --
>  Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
>  http://www.solitude.dk/ >
>  


-- 


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com


Re: [videoblogging] Re: New London Videoblog Group at Meetup.com

2007-02-28 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
I'll do my best andreas. i still have all those interviews to do...
heidelberg might be as easy to get to as anywhere



On 2/28/07, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Den 28.02.2007 kl. 11:44 skrev trine bjørkmann berry
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>  >> You guys are coming to vlogeurope in september. No wedding and no
>  >> moving
>  >> excuses this year. :o)
>  >
>  > you'll be the death of me Andreas the 7th is my birthday.. I am
>  > supposed to be in Norway then. Where is it again this year?? Germany
>  > somewhere?
>
>  I just can't win. Yes, Germany. Heidelberg - a bit south of Frankfurt (am
>  Main).
>
>  --
>  Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
>  http://www.solitude.dk/ >
>  


-- 


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com


Re: [videoblogging] Blip.tv cross-post to Blogger blog...Blogger issue?

2007-03-09 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
I'm having the same trouble right now. I'm trying to set up a new blog
to cross post to and it just stops.

ta
trine


On 3/9/07, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Are you in the old format or the new Blogger?
>
>  If you've changed to the new Blogger, you need to re-do your credentials at
>  Blip.
>
>  Jan
>
>  On 3/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > I'm a fan of Blip.tv, using it with great success, it's terrific.
>  >
>  > I recently have been playing with Blip.tv's mobile-upload, with
>  > cross-posting to Blogger blog:
>  >
>  > http://07baja250.blogspot.com/
>  >
>  > 4 hrs ago, I was mobile-blogging videos to Blip.tv, which get
> cross-posted
>  > to above blog. All of a sudden it quit working!!
>  >
>  > I can't get Blip.tv to "see" any Blogger blogs, is this an issue with
>  > Blogger?
>  >
>  > Blogger recently was trying out a Beta, & it's now "online". I've heard
>  > of some issues w/Blogger, I need some feedback from this group.
>  >
>  > Thanks for any help/advice.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Yahoo! Groups Links
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>  --
>  The Faux Press - better than real
>  http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
>
>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  


-- 


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com


Re: [videoblogging] Blip.tv cross-post to Blogger blog...Blogger issue?

2007-03-09 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
all working again. thanks mike! you guys are so quick it's incredible!

On 09 Mar 2007 10:25:03 -0800, Mike Hudack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hey guys,
>
>  Should be all fixed now. Give us a shout if you have any remaining
>  issues! Hope to see a whole bunch of you in Austin!
>
>  Yours,
>
>  Mike
>
>  -Original Message-
>  From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hudack
>  Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 1:07 PM
>  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>  Subject: RE: [videoblogging] Blip.tv cross-post to Blogger
>  blog...Blogger issue?
>
>  Hey guys,
>
>  We're working on this right now. Charles is at the Hilton Austin on the
>  wifi debugging and fixing as we speak. Hi from SXSW!
>
>  Yours,
>
>  Mike
>
>  -Original Message-
>  From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 12:07 PM
>  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
>  Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Blip.tv cross-post to Blogger
>  blog...Blogger issue?
>
>  Jan McLaughlin
>  > Are you in the old format or the new Blogger?
>  >
>  > If you've changed to the new Blogger, you need to re-do your
>  credentials
>  > at
>  > Blip.
>
>  My Blogger blog is under the "new Blogger" (an older Blogger account,
>  that
>  was upgraded to the Google signin).
>
>  By "credentials" you mean Blip.tv's Distribution/External Blogs? Do you
>  select "Blogger Beta" (what I do) or "Blogger"?
>
>  Like someone else mentioned, I'm getting hung up on the above..it won't
>  come back with a list of blogs.
>
>  >
>  > Jan
>  >
>  > On 3/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>
>  >> I'm a fan of Blip.tv, using it with great success, it's terrific.
>  >>
>  >> I recently have been playing with Blip.tv's mobile-upload, with
>  >> cross-posting to Blogger blog:
>  >>
>  >> http://07baja250.blogspot.com/
>  >>
>  >> 4 hrs ago, I was mobile-blogging videos to Blip.tv, which get
>  >> cross-posted
>  >> to above blog. All of a sudden it quit working!!
>  >>
>  >> I can't get Blip.tv to "see" any Blogger blogs, is this an issue with
>  >> Blogger?
>  >>
>  >> Blogger recently was trying out a Beta, & it's now "online". I've
>  heard
>  >> of some issues w/Blogger, I need some feedback from this group.
>  >>
>  >> Thanks for any help/advice.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Yahoo! Groups Links
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > The Faux Press - better than real
>  > http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
>  >
>  >
>  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>  >
>  >
>
>  Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>  Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>  


-- 


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com


Re: [videoblogging] Re: how to do stop motion

2007-03-14 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
framethief? it's quite good.



On 3/14/07, Rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I saw an interesting intro to stop-motion principles, kit and
>  software by an Aussie guy on YouTube called Blunty3000 who won a
>  competition there for stop motion. He uses lego. Quite cool. He's
>  put a whole bunch of stuff up there, but this is his Stop Motion 101:
>  http://youtube.com/watch?v=Xib6c7UgKbI
>
>  Rupert
>  http://www.fatgirlinohio.org
>  http://www.crowdabout.us/fatgirlinohio/myshow/
>
>
>  On 14 Mar 2007, at 04:17, missbhavens1969 wrote:
>
>  Heath, does your video camera take stills? I just do what Schlomo
>  said: string a whole mess of stills together. And I mean a
>  whhhole mess of them. This was a lot easier to do before
>  there was a cat in the house...she gets off on disturbing objects on
>  tables.
>
>  Takes forever. But the end result is so fun!
>
>  I'm psyched about the software suggestions. It never occured to me
>  there was software for it. I'm duncey that way.
>
>  Can't wait to see what you come up with (will it involve action
>  figures? Hmmm?)
>
>  Bekah
>  --
>  http://www.missbhavens.com
>
>  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > I know this has been dicussed before and I know how to do it with
>  a
>  > video camera, but I think that there is a way to take digital
>  still and
>  > then combine them to create stop motion as well. Is that
>  correct? and
>  > if so could someone please point me into the right direction? I
>  am on
>  > a PC not a mac.
>  >
>  > Thanks!
>  >
>  > Heath
>  > http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com
>  >
>
>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>  


-- 


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com


Re: [videoblogging] Re: twitter question

2007-03-17 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
richard
i love your twitter bio
:)


On 3/17/07, Richard (Show) Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> David,
>
>  Right about importance of design.
>
>  Try setting up a my space page, and that will prove your point a lot
>  stronger than twitter.
>
>  It certainly appears to be what the site does, not how well the interface
>  facilitates it.
>
>  ... Richard
>
>  On 17 Mar 2007 13:01:33 -0700, David Howell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > I agree. The Twitter site design is horrible. With it's popularity
>  > though, it kinda maybe sorta says that site design might not be as
>  > important as has always been preached.
>  >
>  > I am kinda feeling like it is the biggest IRC channel ever. Everyone
>  > in the same channel watching everyone and able to interact with anyone.
>  >
>  > David
>  > http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
>  >
>  > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com ,
>  > "Richard (Show) Hall"
>  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > thanks Robert ... I figured that out right after writing ... the
>  > search box
>  > > is way too difficult to find and not included in the faq under how
>  > to add
>  > > people already in twitter ... bad design, in my humble opinion
>  > >
>  > > ... Richard (no user error) Hall
>  > >
>  > > On 17 Mar 2007 11:54:29 -0700, Robert Scoble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > > wrote:
>  > > >
>  > > > You can search for them, if you know their names. Or you can
>  > just visit
>  > > > someone with lots of Twitter profiles and add those. Mine is at
>  > > > http://www.twitter.com/scobleizer
>  > > >
>  > > > Robert
>  > > >
>  > > > _
>  > > >
>  > > > From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
>  > [mailto:
>  > > > videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> ]
>  > > > On Behalf Of Richard (Show) Hall
>  > > > Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 10:59 AM
>  > > > To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> 
>  > > > Subject: [videoblogging] twitter question
>  > > >
>  > > > How do I find profiles of people already in twitter so I can add
> them?
>  > > >
>  > > > .. Richard (twitter wannabe)
>  > > >
>  > > > --
>  > > > Richard
>  > > > http://richardhhall  .org
>  > > > Shows
>  > > > http://richardshow.  org
>  > > > http://inspiredheal  ing.tv
>  > > >
>  > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>  > > >
>  > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > --
>  > > Richard
>  > > http://richardhhall.org
>  > > Shows
>  > > http://richardshow.org
>  > > http://inspiredhealing.tv
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>  --
>  Richard
>  http://richardhhall.org
>  Shows
>  http://richardshow.org
>  http://inspiredhealing.tv
>
>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Eric Rice is a star /flashmeeting remixed

2007-03-20 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
systaime is your friend? i love his videos on daily motion

>
>  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Loiez D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > The latest flashmeeting on saturday remixed by my friend Michael
>  > Borrras AKA Systaime at the Festival Videoformes 2007
>  >
>  >
>  > French trash touch
>  > http://frenchtrashtouch.blip.tv/file/174717/
>  >
>  > Enjoy it
>  >
>  > Loiez
>  >
>
>  


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


[videoblogging] Research into Videoblogging and Videoblogs - call for help

2007-03-22 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
Hello,

Some of you might know (of) me already, but for those of you who
don't, I am a researcher in Media & Film at the University of Sussex,
UK, and am currently writing my thesis on Videoblogging.

Part of my study is conducting interviews with videobloggers, and I am
currently looking for volunteers. I'd be really grateful if you would
spare a little of your time to tell me about your site. If you agree
to help, I'll mail you a few questions off list. Your answers can be
as long or short as you like. You could really help me by spending as
little as 10 minutes telling me about your experiences. In anything I
use from what you say, I will make sure that no clues are given to
your identity.

I hope you will help. Sorry to have wasted your time if you're not interested.

Many thanks

Trine B Berry

Doctoral Candidate
Department of Media & Film
University of Sussex

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.sussex.ac.uk/mediastudies/profile185401.html


[videoblogging] Re: Research into Videoblogging and Videoblogs - call for help

2007-03-22 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
I should add that I am not necesarily looking for text-based answers,
if you'd rather answer in video format, that is excellent too.

many thanks, especially to those who've stepped up already

trine

On 3/22/07, trine bjørkmann berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some of you might know (of) me already, but for those of you who
> don't, I am a researcher in Media & Film at the University of Sussex,
> UK, and am currently writing my thesis on Videoblogging.
>
> Part of my study is conducting interviews with videobloggers, and I am
> currently looking for volunteers. I'd be really grateful if you would
> spare a little of your time to tell me about your site. If you agree
> to help, I'll mail you a few questions off list. Your answers can be
> as long or short as you like. You could really help me by spending as
> little as 10 minutes telling me about your experiences. In anything I
> use from what you say, I will make sure that no clues are given to
> your identity.
>
> I hope you will help. Sorry to have wasted your time if you're not interested.
>
> Many thanks
>
> Trine B Berry
>
> Doctoral Candidate
> Department of Media & Film
> University of Sussex
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http://www.sussex.ac.uk/mediastudies/profile185401.html
>


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


[videoblogging] Re: Research into Videoblogging and Videoblogs - call for help

2007-03-25 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
hi all,

just wanted to say a big thank you to those of you who have written to
me already, I've sent the questions along from my university email, so
hopefully they've not got lost into anyone's spam filters.

Also, if anyone's intersted in helping out, I am still looking for
volunteers, so drop me a line.

many thanks
trine



On 3/22/07, trine bjørkmann berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some of you might know (of) me already, but for those of you who
> don't, I am a researcher in Media & Film at the University of Sussex,
> UK, and am currently writing my thesis on Videoblogging.
>
> Part of my study is conducting interviews with videobloggers, and I am
> currently looking for volunteers. I'd be really grateful if you would
> spare a little of your time to tell me about your site. If you agree
> to help, I'll mail you a few questions off list. Your answers can be
> as long or short as you like. You could really help me by spending as
> little as 10 minutes telling me about your experiences. In anything I
> use from what you say, I will make sure that no clues are given to
> your identity.
>
> I hope you will help. Sorry to have wasted your time if you're not interested.
>
> Many thanks
>
> Trine B Berry
>
> Doctoral Candidate
> Department of Media & Film
> University of Sussex
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http://www.sussex.ac.uk/mediastudies/profile185401.html
>


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] academic collection

2007-03-27 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
thanks adrian,

this also looks good, though a bit broader

http://tinyurl.com/23ql6a

lots of interesting abstracts

Trine


On 27 Mar 2007 00:55:06 -0700, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Den 27.03.2007 kl. 08:02 skrev Adrian Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>  > http://professordvd.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/03/post_identity_n.html
>  >
>  > recent issue of a journal with some academic material on videoblogging.
>
>  This looks very usefull. Thanks for sharing!
>
>  --
>  Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
>  http://www.solitude.dk/ >
>  


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Hyperlinks in Video

2007-04-03 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
hi I'm skimming this, so this might have been mentioned already, but
Andreas (solitude.dk) has done a thingy that allows you to put links
into videos really easily, i can/t remember where it is, try his
website. or andreas, who's most likely lurking here anyway, can tell
you ;-)

trine



On 4/3/07, Michael Szpakowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Personally I really like LiveStagePro, made by the
>  dreadfully named Totally Hip Technologies..
>  http://www.totallyhip.com/products.html
>  Well, *like* is putting it a bit strongly as it can be
>  idiosyncratic to say the least..plus its not cheap,
>  plus support from said TH is a joke, *but* it really
>  does unlock all sorts of quirky & wonderful stuff
>  within QuickTime. Not only hyperlinking but
>  interactivity & generativity..
>  For example I made this generative piece
>
> http://www.somedancersandmusicians.com/vlog/ScenesOfProvincialLife.cgi/2006/03/16#post47
>
>  & this piece, which takes a feed from a live web cam:
>
> http://www.somedancersandmusicians.com/vlog/ScenesOfProvincialLife.cgi/2006/07/24#post102
>
>  & this one where *you* upload the content:
>
> http://www.somedancersandmusicians.com/vlog/ScenesOfProvincialLife.cgi/2006/12/17#post128
>
>  with the assistance of LSP.
>  There's also rather a good book
> http://www.amazon.com/Interactive-QuickTime-Authoring-Wired-Developer/dp/1558607463/ref=pd_sim_b_1/103-7922496-2881427
>
>  which is essentially a guide to LSP.
>  I understand one can also script QT directly in Java &
>  such - way beyond me.
>  michael
>  


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] Re: I've got 2 Joost invites... anybody want one?

2007-04-04 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
I'\d love one if they are still some free!

thanks

trine

On 4/4/07, sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> i have 5.
>
>  On 4/4/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > There's more invites to be had now if you are still interested.
>  >
>  > Cheers
>  >
>  > Steve Elbows
>  >
>  > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com ,
>
>  > Jen Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > If anyone out there has an invite, I'd love one!
>  > >
>  > > I've been following invite-leads around for weeks, getting there just
>  > > a moment too late, or being promised invites that never came. It's
>  > > kind of weird how hard this has gotten.
>  > >
>  > > I would REALLY love for something to work out and for me to be able
>  > > to get hooked up --- maybe that's you?
>  > >
>  > > thanks,
>  > > Jen
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > _
>  > > Jen Simmons
>  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > http://jensimmons.com
>  > > http://milkweedmediadesign.com
>  > > 267-235-6967
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > On Mar 21, 2007, at 3:22 pm, Chuck Leggett wrote:
>  > >
>  > > > An email from Joost today informed me that I have 2 invites to use
>  > > > before tomorrow. If anyone is interested in one of them, please email
>  > > > me with your name and email address.
>  > > >
>  > > > email to request joost invite:
>  > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > >
>  > > > Chuck's Vlog
>  > > > http://runchuckrun.blogspot.com
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>  


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


[videoblogging] norwegian labour party joins the youtube party

2007-04-21 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
just a note to those interested i political videoblogging (or, rather,
politician *doing* videoblogging)

Norwegian labour party just joined the youtube generation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zVUb8vE6CU

reminded me of the even more uncomfortable announcement by Tony Blair
the other week.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gul2U43solE

Trine


Re: [videoblogging] Put up or shut up

2007-05-03 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
i dont know if it's helpful, but I've added my short article on david
cameron's videoblog to the wikipedia article. (under all the book
entries) - i realise it's not on par with the books in terms of
citeability, but it's academic and published in a journal.

cheers
Trine





On 5/3/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Okayif you care about the wikipedia article on Videoblogging, lets
>  take all the conversation to that site. Ive jumped in here:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Video_blog#Removed_section:_Dispute_over_terminology
>
>  "Pdelongchamp, since you seem to have a vision for this page, maybe
>  you can share with us where you want this go. Or are you just being a
>  referee as people make contributions? It'll help me understand exactly
>  what role you are playing in this process. I am assuming good faith,
>  but it's unclear to me where you're mind is at. What is Videoblogging
>  to you? With all the articles and books listed so far, it's difficult
>  to say that it's not a significant artform. I think it would help if
>  we could all agree on the major areas we want to cover.
>
>  Let's document the discussion/writing over there so its official.
>  To be honest, I read wikipedia all the time, but have never
>  contributed to an article. So it'll be new to me.
>
>  Patrick, I'm going to take you at your word that you're working in good
> faith.
>  let's start building.
>  there are so many mainstream articles, books, and scholarly reports to
>  pull from.
>
>  Jay
>
>  --
>  Here I am
>  http://jaydedman.com
>
>  Check out the latest project:
>  http://pixelodeonfest.com/
>  Webvideo festival this June
>  


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] Put up or shut up

2007-05-04 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
yes i wasn't being clear, i actually meant my article might not be
useful as a source for citing definitions of videoblogs, as it's about
colonisation of new media spaces by politicians.
:)

I'll write that one next ;-)

On 5/4/07, Richard (Show) Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ok, for the record, if the article you refer to is in a peer-reviewed
>  jornal, it's gone through at least as much serious scrutiny as anything
>  published in a book or via a traditional news media source
>
>  In fact, in a serious journal, if I try using a magazine/news article as a
>  reference, it would not be acceptable.
>
>  ... Richard
>
>  p.s. I'm not saying I agree with the whole definition of "reliable" article
>  in wikipedia, or that the academic peer-review process is the best as far
> as
>  truth goes, but, I will say academics have been having this debate for a
>  long time and, as a result - via the peer review process - they have, by
>  far, the most brutal (tedious, time consuming) process of verification and
>  cross verification of any sort if informational outlet, but, lord help us
> if
>  we're stuck with that :)
>
>  On 5/3/07, trine bjørkmann berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > i dont know if it's helpful, but I've added my short article on david
>  > cameron's videoblog to the wikipedia article. (under all the book
>  > entries) - i realise it's not on par with the books in terms of
>  > citeability, but it's academic and published in a journal.
>  >
>  > cheers
>  > Trine
>  >
>  >
>  > On 5/3/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
>
>  > wrote:
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Okayif you care about the wikipedia article on Videoblogging, lets
>  > > take all the conversation to that site. Ive jumped in here:
>  > >
>  >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Video_blog#Removed_section:_Dispute_over_terminology
>  > >
>  > > "Pdelongchamp, since you seem to have a vision for this page, maybe
>  > > you can share with us where you want this go. Or are you just being a
>  > > referee as people make contributions? It'll help me understand exactly
>  > > what role you are playing in this process. I am assuming good faith,
>  > > but it's unclear to me where you're mind is at. What is Videoblogging
>  > > to you? With all the articles and books listed so far, it's difficult
>  > > to say that it's not a significant artform. I think it would help if
>  > > we could all agree on the major areas we want to cover.
>  > >
>  > > Let's document the discussion/writing over there so its official.
>  > > To be honest, I read wikipedia all the time, but have never
>  > > contributed to an article. So it'll be new to me.
>  > >
>  > > Patrick, I'm going to take you at your word that you're working in good
>  > > faith.
>  > > let's start building.
>  > > there are so many mainstream articles, books, and scholarly reports to
>  > > pull from.
>  > >
>  > > Jay
>  > >
>  > > --
>  > > Here I am
>  > > http://jaydedman.com
>  > >
>  > > Check out the latest project:
>  > > http://pixelodeonfest.com/
>  > > Webvideo festival this June
>  > >
>  >
>  > --
>  > 
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>  > trine.blogs.com
>  > twitter.com/trine
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>  --
>  Richard
>  http://richardhhall.org
>  Shows
>  http://richardshow.org
>  http://inspiredhealing.tv
>
>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>  


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Youtube Partner Program

2007-05-18 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
oh Jay, the Mighty Boosh is my favourite!

it's on constant DVD in my house...

:)

On 5/18/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Just to finish my waffle, I hadnt noticed that podtech have sectioned
>  > things more clearly than when I last looked, so yours and other's
>  > envirogreensustain vids are in a 'clean tech' section. But I dont get
>  > a sense of there being a community of viewers at podtech, due to lack
>  > of comments or other features that would enable such things (or I just
>  > cant find them).
>
>  i cant speak for how Podtech markets their site.
>  seems to me like they are learning.
>  and yes, "clean tech" can mean lots of things.
>  as with anything, all i can do is show what i know to be true.
>
>  with Ryanishungry.com, we were able to license our videos to Podtech
>  for one year.
>  we retain ownership and can post the videos to our own site throughout the
> year.
>  they've been good about the whole situation.
>  its not a huge amount of money...but its guaranteed money for us...and
>  they get regular content that's much cheaper than if they hired their
>  own team.
>
>  for some completely different... i wish American TV could look like this:
>  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PPWDglTboI
>
>  Jay
>  


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] Is there a listings for pixelodeon?

2007-05-25 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
i dont need a reason (thought pixelodeon is a great one!) i just need
the cash :-(

;-)



On 5/25/07, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Is there someway of finding out without actually coming to California
>  > again for the weekend, who is on show and if I can watch on line
>  > somewhere?
>
>  yeah...None of my videos were chosen either.
>  as Bill said, if your video was playingyou would know about it
>  because a curator would have contacted you. Just to be clear,
>  Pixelodeon was not a voting contest.
>  we chose different curators who then created their screenings based on a
> theme.
>  The goal is not to show "the best"...but to show the varied kinds of
>  content people are making.
>
>  The wiki was a place that the community could suggest videos to screen
>  since no one can know everything that exists online. We're now
>  planning on playing many of these videos in the DIY Theater. So please
>  keep adding:
>  http://pixelodeon.pbwiki.com/submit%20videos
>
>  after the festival, we're figuring out the best way to list/present
>  the videos we screen.
>  its really just a matter of figuring out the most respectful way to
>  promote people's videos.
>
>  come on Pauldo you really need a reason to come to LA?
>
>  Jay
>
>  --
>  Here I am
>  http://jaydedman.com
>
>  Check out the latest project:
>  http://pixelodeonfest.com/
>  Webvideo festival this June
>  


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


[videoblogging] pop urls

2007-05-28 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
Apologies if this has been posted already.

http://popurls.com/

really cool aggregator site.

this aggregates everything you could possibly want!  very neat..

Trine


[videoblogging] interesting from Henry Jenkins

2007-05-30 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
thought some of you would find this itneresting, if you haven't seen it already

Nine Propositions Towards a Cultural Theory of YouTube

The following is adapted from remarks I made at the International
Communications Association conference in San Francisco this past week.
I was asked to be part of a plenary session organized by Fred Turner,
"What's So Significant about Social Networking?: Web 2.0 and Its
Critical Potential," which also featured Howard Rheingold, Beth
Noveck, and Tiziana Terranova. We had ten minutes to speak so I took
this as a challenge and offered nine big ideas about the place of
YouTube in contemporary culture. Many of these ideas will be familiar
to regular readers of this blog since most of them have evolved here
over the past year, but I thought you might find them interesting
distilled down in this form. (For those who may be joining us from the
ICA crowd, I've included links back to the original posts from which
these ideas have evolved.)

http://www.henryjenkins.org/2007/05/9_propositions_towards_a_cultu.html

Trine


Re: [videoblogging] A Webby Request: 5 Clever Words

2007-06-01 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
"a reason to keep vlogging"

:)


On 6/1/07, Steve Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Blip.tv is people, like you!
>
>  Join us at blip.tv. Thanks.
>
>  Thanks Steve Garfield from stevegarfield.com
>
>  On May 31, 2007, at 2:02 PM, dinarebecca wrote:
>
>  > Hi you guys!
>  >
>  > Wanted to solicit some help for our five-word (or less) acceptance
>  > speech at the Webbies.
>  >
>  > Justin has the best one I've heard so far: "Please. Keep.
>  > Uploading."
>  >
>  > Does anyone have any other thoughts/ideas/suggestions?
>  >
>  > (Also, the tickets are insane this year, so if anyone - by any chance
>  > - has an extra ticket we would LOVE to buy that from you and will be
>  > forever and ever and ever grateful!)
>  >
>  > Thanks so much,
>  >
>  > Dina
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Yahoo! Groups Links
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>  --
>  Steve Garfield
>  http://SteveGarfield.com
>
>  This email is: [ ] publishable [X] ask first [ ] private
>
>  


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] Re: need a videocamera recommendation: good in low light, price <$300

2007-06-27 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
only problem with the xacti (which i have, and love) is the sound isn't very
good on it... but i think you can use an external microphone... (which i
don't , which is why i don't use the audio ever :))
trine


On 6/26/07, Bill Streeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Hey Deirdré,
>
> I don't think a sub $300 cam thats good in low light exists. When
> you buy a more expensive camera part of what you are paying for is
> better low light performance and all the things that make it
> possible (larger ccds, better optics etc). Some of the lower end
> Canons and Sonys have pretty good low light performance but they are
> priced just above the $300 mark. Check camcorderinfo.com for some
> pretty good reviews and sample footage of most of the cameras
> available now. They do extensive low light testing too.
>
> Bill Streeter
> LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> http://lofistl.com
> http://billstreeter.net
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com ,
> "Deirdre Straughan"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > --
> > best regards,
> > Deirdré Straughan
> >
> > living & travelling in Italy
> > (and other Countries Beginning with I)
> > www.beginningwithi.com
> > Check out my latest blog post: My Potter
> >
> Predictions >
> > Blogsigs.com , Link your own blog
> posts.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>  
>



-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Vloggercon Europe 2007?

2007-06-28 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
sadly, i can't make it (again) this year...


Trine




On 6/28/07, Deirdre Straughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Dunno yet. Depends where in the world I am at the time. Any of several
> continents is possible.
>
> --
> best regards,
> Deirdré Straughan
>
> living & travelling in Italy
> (and other Countries Beginning with I)
> www.beginningwithi.com
> Check out my latest blog post: Everyday Italian: Newspaper Headlines
> 4
> Blogsigs.com , Link your own blog posts.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>



-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Fwd: Call to Participate in Perry Bard's Global Remakeof Vertov's "Man With A Movie Camera"

2007-07-14 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
might be interesting to some on this list?
trine

++

today on newsgrist:
http://newsgrist.typepad.com/underbelly/2007/07/perry-bards-glo.html

New York artist Perry Bard has a new project that requires participants!

via MWAMC website:
http://dziga.perrybard.net/

Dziga Vertov's 1929 film Man With A Movie Camera records the progression of
one full day synthesizing footage shot in Moscow, Riga, and Kiev. The film
begins with titles that declare it "an experiment in the cinematic
communication of visible events without the aid of intertitles, without the
aid of a scenario, without the aid of theater." It is often described as an
urban documentary yet the subject of the film is also the film itself -from
the role of the cameraman to that of the editor to its projection in a
theatre and the response of the audience. It is a film within a film made
with a range of inventive effects -dissolves, split screen, slow motion,
freeze frame-all of which are now embedded in digital editing software.

2008: Man With a Movie Camera is a participatory video shot by people around
the world who are invited to record video according to the original script
of Vertov's Man With A Movie Camera and submit it to a website which will
archive, sequence and deliver the submissions to The Big Screen (
www.bbc.co.uk/bigscreens/) in 2007-08. When the work streams your
contribution becomes part of a worldwide montage, in Vertov's terms the
"decoding of life as it is."

This website contains every shot in Vertov's 1929 film along with thumbnails
representing the beginning middle and end of each shot.

You are invited to interpret Vertov and upload your footage to this site to
become part of the database. See the Scene Index.

PRESENTATION
2008:Man With a Movie Camera will be streamed on four public screens in the
UK beginning in October 2007 on the Big Screen Manchester

All material on this site is public domain

MORE INFO:
http://dziga.perrybard.net/

CONTACT
Please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions about this project.

--
530 laguardia place #5, nyc 10012
http://joygarnett.com




-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
twitter.com/trine

  --

___
Icommons mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/icommons


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] What's the best way to credit music from ccmixter

2008-01-29 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
i *think* that if the person whose music you're using used a sample,
they're responsible for having cleared and credited that sample. but
again, i am no lawyer.

this is one of the problems with CC licenced stuff. another is
incompatible licences.

and i think your google ads *might* be a problem.

andreas?


On Jan 29, 2008 9:04 PM, Irene Duma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Richard. Yeah, I pretty much was going to put that all in there, but
>  was struggling with the sample. I think the vocals are all sampled, so
>  that¹s a pretty big chunk.
>
>  But it may be best to contact the artist. I was just hoping to get this up
>  fast ­ before another Semanal week changeover. No such thing as fast
>
>  I do have some google ads on my site too, for whatever that¹s worth.
>
>
>
>  On 1/29/08 3:59 PM, "Richard H. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Hi Irene,
>  >
>  > First of all, note that the song has a "by" and non-commercial cc copy
>  > right, so, as long as your not making money you're ok. If you advertising
> or
>  > something, then, my opinion is that you need to ask permission - but
> let's
>  > assume you're not making money from the video.
>  >
>  > Since part of the cc is by (attribution) you're correct to give them
> credit.
>  >
>  > If it were me, here's what I do:
>  >
>  > begin *
>  >
>  > "Six Feet Under (j-tine mix)"
>  > jaspertine
>  > myspace/modalia
>  >
>  > ccMixter
>  > ccmixter.org
>  >
>  > ***end
>  >
>  > First I think it's always best to give the band's web site if they have
> one,
>  > as opposed to a description page on some other site, that's why I went
> with
>  > myspace (assuming they don't have their own independent site). Also, the
>  > band name and the site are what are listed for the song, so I wouldn't
> worry
>  > about the discrepancy in names.
>  >
>  > Second, I always like to give the name of the site that's providing me
> with
>  > the creative commons music, or pod safe music, that's why I would also
>  > credit ccMixter - I think with pod safe music, the terms of service
> require
>  > that you give pod safe credit and list the link, but I would anyway.
>  >
>  > ... I ain't even close to being a lawyer, but that's what I would do ...
>  > best ... Richard
>  >
>  > On Jan 28, 2008 11:27 PM, Irene Duma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > wrote:
>  >
>  >> > Hi guys,
>  >> >
>  >> > Found a great tune on ccmixter.org...(thank you videoblog wiki!).
>  >> >
>  >> > I put together a faux experimental video for semanal, a quick one
> because
>  >> > I
>  >> > am behind, but I can¹t figure out how to credit the music.
>  >> >
>  >> > It¹s one song that uses samples from another song on ccmixter. The
> artist
>  >> > uses one name on ccmixter, another on his myspace page. What name do I
>  >> > use?
>  >> > Do I put a link to the ccmixter page? Or to his myspace page? Do I
> need to
>  >> > credit the sample too? What should I say?
>  >> >
>  >> > Any ideas from the group?
>  >> >
>  >> > Here¹s the song ­ very cool.
>  >> > http://ccmixter.org/media/files/jaspertine/13020
>  >> >
>  >> > Geez ­ you think you¹re done ­ and there¹s still a ton of work to do.
>  >> >
>  >> > Thanks!
>  >> >
>  >> > Irene Duma
>  >> > Strange Duck Media
>  >> > ...a good egg
>  >> >
>  >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>
>  >> 
>  >> > T 416-769-1879 C 416-535-0652
>  >> > web design and creative marketing
>  >> > blogging easy computer tips http://www.strangeduck.com/blog
>  >> > and comedy at http://www.bittertonic.com
>  >> >
>  >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> >
>
>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>  



-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
henrikisak.blogspot.com
twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video Goes Underground

2008-08-16 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
For the record;

Knut Hamsun (and his character in Hunger, incidentally) both had to
'deal with people'. The character in Hunger spends much of his time
trying desperately to get paid, and - ironically perhaps - finds that
when he does get paid, he can no longer work.

Hamsun was a much admired author in Norway until he started meddling
in politics and made himself incredibly unpopular. He even received
the Nobel Price for literature, luckily, perhaps, before the
aforementioned meddling in politics left him with fewer friends among
the so-called norwegian cultural elite (contradiction in terms, I
know... ;-))

Trine



On 8/9/08, ractalfece <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see the philosophical difference.  I understand starving for art.
> Knut Hamsun's "Hunger".  Great book.  But here's the difference
> between Knut and me.  I'm starving and dealing with people.  Why
> should I have to accept the hardships of fame without compensation?
>
> I don't.  That's why I can't guarantee in the future you'll be able to
> see my work without paying.
>
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jen Proctor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm sorry that you've had hard financial times.  I could go into the
>> financial straits my family and I have endured as well, but I don't
>> think that's the point.  I don't think the hardship of living out of a
>> car is still any kind of justification that art is best served within
>> commodity culture.
>>
>> I'm not saying that YOU should remove your work from commodity
>> culture.  That's not my argument - you should do whatever you feel is
>> right for your work and your life, and I completely respect that. I
>> just take issue with the notion that asking viewers to pay the
>> individual maker for online video is any kind of revolution or,
>> ultimately, a viable solution.
>>
>> It's simply a philosophical disagreement - power to ya to do whatever
>> is right for you. I just can't guarantee that I'll pay to watch your
> work.
>>
>> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "ractalfece"  wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > > So I guess my point regarding Information Dystopia is that as
> much as
>> > > I'd like to see artists better compensated for their work, whether
>> > > through public funding or individual donations, as requested in the
>> > > video, the disconnect from this larger history makes the call for
>> > > compensation feel more like hubris than a revolution. The
> situation we
>> > > are in as artists on the web is nothing new in terms of trying
> to make
>> > > money. To me, as Rupert has stated earlier, the greater
> revolution of
>> > > the web is in the possibilities for removing our work from commodity
>> > > culture - making the work free, accessible, open, and remixable.
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > Jen, watch this video response I did to Mark Horowitz's "7 Days in a
>> > Sentra" ad campaign.
>> >
>> > Mark Horriblewitz's video:
>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eMXE2Z58QI
>> >
>> > My response:
>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHFPsx_7id0
>> >
>> > Then tell me about removing my work from commodity culture.
>> >
>> > - john@ -
>> >
>>
>
>
>


-- 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trine.blogs.com
henrikisak.blogspot.com
twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] Archive of Videoblog.tv from 2003 onwards

2009-03-08 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
Wow Rupert that's incredible!
Shame that first video is gone...
is this the guy?
http://www.askmrvideo.com/

On 3/5/09, Rupert  wrote:
> I found the Buzzmachine post via the Wayback machine archive of
> Videoblog.tv - now dead.
> http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.videoblog.tv
>
> And I found that because I was browsing the first month of the group,
> and there was a message by Perry Lawrence saying that he'd been
> playing around with videoblogs for a couple of years - actually since
> early 2003 - and had also been doing mobile videoblogging using his
> Nokia.
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/241
>
>
>


-- 


twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] Re: A call for Art Vlogs and Art Vloggers

2009-03-17 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
clog ! was that a typo or short for.. i dunno.. cine-blog?

like it

:)

Trine

On 3/17/09, Josh Eklow  wrote:
> Yeah, as am art student with a clog, I consider mine to be art.
> www.newroachmotel.com
>
>
>


-- 


twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] Re: NOT The 05 Project.

2006-04-15 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
welcome back Ian, you've been missed!

now i have two links to update on my roll...

;-)

trine

ps happy easter everyone!

vlog: http://trine.blogs.com

On 4/15/06, mgmoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  I followed the very easy instructions at http://www.freevlog.org/ and
>  it took me less then 5 minutes to have an RSS feed.
>  Does it work? Well, that's hard to say so far, but it sure was easy.
>
>  Mike
>  http://moon.blogspot.com/
>
>
>  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Josh Leo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > i tried adding it but it didnt work
>  > On 4/15/06, Ian Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >  Hey all,
>  > > thanks for the support! I meant. i dont know if the RSS works. has
>  anyone
>  > > used it yet? I should probably add a feed burner on there to see...
>  > > - Ian
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>  
>


--

+ http://www.davidandtrine.org +


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Creative Commons music sites

2006-04-18 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
magnatune, locarecords (locarecords.com) and (I think) fading ways
(http://www.fadingwaysmusic.com/) releases music with open licences...

there should be some stuff on remixreading.org and ccmixter.org

trine

On 4/18/06, Ryan Ozawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>  Hash: SHA1
>
>  Of course, now that I've hit send, I remembered the site that billed a
>  couple of vloggers a few hundred bucks.  Freeplay Music.
>
>  It's site that many might initially assume was offering music for free for
>  non-commercial purposes (especially given the name), but in fact was not
>  (or, at least, was not for web publishing, which was a separate, paid
>  license).  So if you're looking for free and/or total clearances, scratch
>  them off your list.
>
>  Even sites that are listed as sources for CC-licensed material require some
>  care in selecting artists and pieces, as there are CC licenses that are
>  more restrictive than others (and I've seen some that invoke traditional
>  copyright).
>
>
>  - --
>  Ryan
>  HawaiiVog.com
>
>  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>  Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.6 (Build 6060)
>  Comment: http://www.lightfantastic.org/pgp.txt
>
> iQA/AwUBRESH1c/o8udD/KcXEQL6aQCfT1Fm97ezje2ZVfOX0Ku7C6ICvjwAoJnx
>  HFAfSs56ObeTaL+ZItuFD310
>  =rEmb
>  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
>
>
>  SPONSORED LINKS
>  Fireant Individual Use
>
>  
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>
>  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>  
>


--

+ http://www.davidandtrine.org +


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Do you remember your first time...

2006-05-22 Thread trine bjørkmann berry



my first public-vlog was actually during videoblogginweek - vlogging
dangerously right? I almost got hit by a football (or was that
soccerball? ;-)) and you can tell how p*** off I was with where we
were living at the time

http://blip.tv/file/22853

trine


On 5/22/06, Mike Moon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Well, not satisfied with being nervous about vlogging in public... I
>  decided to skip that step and go right on to conducting an
>  interview... sort of.
>
> http://moon.blogspot.com/2006/05/my-first-interviewsorta.html
>
>
>  Mike
>  http://vlog.mikemoon.net
>  Day 3 of my holidays
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  SPONSORED LINKS
>  Fireant Individual Typepad
>  Use Explains
>
>  
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>  
>
>


-- 

+ http://www.davidandtrine.org +





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Fireant
  
  
Individual
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  
  
Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [videoblogging] Re: Have Money Will Vlog

2006-05-25 Thread trine bjørkmann berry



ok i tried to pledge $10 and i think i just pledged $20 - there you
go, the power of chris weagel...

good luck! i am looking forward to see the result.. shame i won't be
there to celebrate at vloggercon...

trine x

On 5/25/06, Kevin Buckstiegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Very cool guys! I would love to see you succeed with this project, looks
> strangely
>  intriguing (as all of HD stuff is) ... so, can this be a tax write off too
> :)~
>
>
>  Kev!
>  LimeBlog
>  http://www.lgt2.com/limeblogbeta
>
>
>  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jay dedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  >
>  > On 5/25/06, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > Beyond the obvious coolness of this idea, we have opportunities through
>  > > this initiative to decide - as a group - to push first one and then
>  > > others among us - up through the bubble-up process.
>  > > Let's make Human-Dog a vlog star.
>  > > We can do it.
>  > > Why not? What else have we to do?
>  > > I gave a dollar-biscuit to Human-Dog! Woof.
>  >
>  > just overnight, we've gotten chris 25% to his goal
>  > everyone blog about the project.
>  > I dont think it'll be hard to raise 1000$ in small increments.
>  >
>  > Just wait till we see what Human Dog will come up with.
>  >
>  > Jay
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Adventures in Videoblogging
>  > 
>  > 
>  > 
>  > Cell: 917 371 6790
>  >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  SPONSORED LINKS
>  Fireant Individual Typepad
>  Use Explains
>
>  
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>  
>
>


-- 

+ http://www.davidandtrine.org +





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Fireant
  
  
Individual
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  
  
Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[videoblogging] andreas in the economist

2006-09-25 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
>From hypertext to hypervideo
Sep 21st 2006
>From The Economist print edition

Software: New technology that links together segments of online video
delights viewers, vloggers and video-on-demand vendors

THE rise of the web transformed hypertext—which allows readers to
click on a word in one document and be transported to another—from an
obscure concept in computer science to a familiar, everyday
technology. Might hypervideo—which lets viewers click on a moving
image to call up a related clip—be on the verge of a similar
transformation? This nascent development, also called
video-hyperlinking, makes it easy to link together segments of online
video in novel ways. Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen, a video blogger (or
"vlogger") based in Aalborg, Denmark, who likes to video-hyperlink
clips on his website, says the technology is a "vlogger's dream".

full story..

https://www.economist.com/science/tq/displayStory.cfm?story_id=7904166

-- 

+ http://trine.blogs.com+


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: Re: [videoblogging] Example of how video could change things

2006-11-27 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
.. further to that, there is also the question of whether there could
actually be "a truth" (The Truth) or whether there are multiple
"truths" or merely representations...

;-)


On 11/27/06, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Den 27.11.2006 kl. 03:39 skrev Charles Iliya Krempeaux
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>  > I'm not sure what you mean here. How could that video show anything
>  > but the truth. (You don't believe it to be a fake do you?)
>
>  While a video camera records what it sees it rarely shows The Truth, and
>  assuming so is dangerous. There is always the matter of perspective when
>  recording a video. In the very simplest of terms the camera was turned on
>  at a specific time and turned off at a specific time, and while it was
>  turned on it was pointed in one direction and not in other directions.
>  After that comes the issues regarding editing and other post-production
>  work. The choices made when shooting or editing need not to be malicious
>  to be misleading and the question of interpretation is just as important
>  with video as with reading a written account.
>
>  A video can never show The Truth (as in 'how did this event transpire').
>  Video is not omnipresent, it can only show a situation as it happened from
>  one perspective and that's the important thing to remember.
>
>  For an easy intro to this kind of stuff I can recommend Rasmus Dahl's
>  article "Disctinctions in Documentary Television" (in "The Aesthetics of
>  Television", Aalborg University Press, 2001)
>
>  --
>  Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
>  http://www.solitude.dk/ >
>  


-- 

+ http://www.davidandtrine.org +


Re: [videoblogging] The queen of England's podcast

2006-12-28 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
hi mike,

I wouldn't call the queen a politician ;-)

however, the conservative party leader, david cameron, has his own
videoblog at webcameron.org.uk if you want to check that out. there's
a couple more (http://5thnovember.blogspot.com/ being the first that
spring to mind, though technically not a "videoblogger" but certainly
political!)

merry christmas

trine

On 12/27/06, Mike Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I think someone might have posted about this, but in case noone did.
>
>  I just added the queen of England's podcast to my list of politicians
>  who podcast.
>
>  http://mefeedia.com/lists/57/
>
>  It is only an audio podcast, not a video podcast.
>
>  It's also just a podcast of speaches, not a direct or personal
>  address, but still, it's pretty cool.
>
>  I couldn't find an actual corresponding blog like page, so here's the
>  page on mefeedia.
>
>  http://mefeedia.com/feeds/22360/
>
>  Only two speaches so far.
>
>  That makes one Chancellor of Germany (a video podcast), the queen of
>  england, the president of the united states (three podcasts, one video
>  podcast of his dog), and a bunch of senators and congressmen... even
>  some state and city government level politicians. Most of them audio
>  podcast, but a select few video podcast.
>
>  If you know any others let me know either here or by leaving a comment
>  on my list. I know I'm far from complete.
>
>  -Mike
>  mefeedia.com
>  mmeiser.com/blog
>  


-- 

+ http://www.davidandtrine.org +


[videoblogging] quotes for article

2005-10-19 Thread trine bjørkmann berry



hi all,
 
I am in the process of writing an article/paper about videoblogging, looking at what i call 'imagined audiences'. In order to give my paper some substance, I am looking for videobloggers who are willing to answer 3 to 5 question related to their work and who wouldn't mind me using their answers in my article. 

 
If you're interested in taking part, please email me off list and I'll send you the questions. 
 
Best
 
Trine B Berry


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[videoblogging] article questions

2005-10-21 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
thanks to everyone who volunteered to help out with my little  
*survey* - I could still do with some more people though, so if you  
fancy it, mail me off list and I'll forward the questions to you.

Many thanks

Trine B Berry


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] New member, new vlog...abstract, experimental work

2005-10-25 Thread trine bjørkmann berry


i checked out one in WMP (light) and one in quicktime (bunny) and both oktrinehttp://www.davidandtrine.orgOn 25 Oct 2005, at 16:22, Steve Garfield wrote:  When trying to view this on a Mac, the video buffers a lot and is jerky.  Any other Mac users seeing this?  Thanks, --Steve  On Oct 25, 2005, at 12:35 AM, grahamawatson wrote:  > It's more experimental work that is really trying to play up the  > pixelated, noisy > qualities of digital video, as well as some more conceptual projects  > concerning new media > and the like. > > Anyways, enjoy: > > http://lossyvideo.blogspot.com/  --Steve --  Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com Video Blog  - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com  Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution.YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [videoblogging] Videoblogging-Universe snippets?

2006-01-31 Thread trine bjørkmann berry


how do you get your feed onto it though?? I tied writing to him some time ago, but got no answer...:-(On 31 Jan 2006, at 13:42, Michael Sullivan wrote: Ro's service takes videos fron RSS enclosures that are added to the queue and transcodes them to resized flv or swf.I believe at first, Ro may have tkane several feeds to get things going but you can email him to get a feed added.  I think the current list is here: http://videoblogging-universe.com/feeds.txtHe can ellaborate since that is all I really know at this point... and it could be slightly inaccurate. SullOn 1/31/06, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm wondering how the snippets of video are derived athttp://videoblogging-universe.com/?  Are they extracted (and resizedto thumbnail size)?  Or do they come straight out of the target quicktime files from the sites?  Or another method?   Thanks,   Enric   -===-   http://www.cirne.com   Determine MediaYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- sull- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -"The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directoryhttp://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [videoblogging] 1-click subscription button for FireAnt

2006-01-31 Thread trine bjørkmann berry


quick question (sorry if I've not been paying attention...) does FireAnt sync to iPod Video??thankstrinehttp://www.davidandtrine.orgOn 31 Jan 2006, at 15:20, Joshua Kinberg wrote:  FireAnt also suports feed:// protocol (instead of using http:// just replace that with feed:// ) when you click this kind of link, your browser will ask you what you want application you want to handle it.  However, this doesn't solve the issue that many of our users specifically requested. Many people wanted to recommend that their viewers subscribe in FireAnt and wanted a 1-click solution that works specifically for FireAnt (like many of the other 1-click solutions for other aggregators).  So if you like FireAnt because [A] you probably know us, and [B] it handles media exceptionally well and provides proper attribution, context, and linkbacks (unlike other podcatchers), then including the FireAnt 1-click button on your site might be really worth while.  Best, Josh   http://FireAnt.tv  On 1/31/06, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:33:26 +, Arnþór Snær wrote > > Why have the browsers failed here? None of them responds in the same > > way when a user clicks an rss feed. > > Browsers didn't fail. RSS failed. This issue is one of the many that the > Atom syndication format fixed. RSS never made any thought on how > subscriptions could be made apart from the "oh, I'll just copy and paste > this feed url into my reader". > > - Andreas > -- >  > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[videoblogging] by way of introduction....

2005-08-23 Thread trine bjørkmann berry




hi all,

just joined this group, and thought I'd say hello!

I suppose my blog and vlog will speak for itself, but in summary i am  
a Norwegian living in Brighton, UK, where I try to balance  
motherhood, being in a crazy book club, doing a phd and the art of  
living abroad... In between, I also try to live a little...

on a technical note, i am completely lost on how to sort out RSS for  
video, so if anyone's got any good advice, I would really appreciate  
a private email to help me out...

Cheers

Trine
(http://www.davidandtrine.org)









  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Explains
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  












Re: [videoblogging] Re: Electric Verdi

2005-08-29 Thread trine bjørkmann berry


and people ask why i like this sclomo bloke anyway, i am well up for paying for buttons (very trendy too no?) and me and my musician husband are already famous for stickering most parts of where we live and big areas of London, so would definitely be up for some guerilla-stickering-action here in the UK with some cool vlog stickers if these are available. Trine=http://www.davidandtrine.org - blog/vloghttp://criticalpositions.blogspot.com - vlog=On 29 Aug 2005, at 02:16, johngaltsjournal wrote:  I would join any cult that had Electric Verdi g-strings!  That's a cult that knows how to party. schlomo http://webzine2005.com http://schlomolog.blogspot.com  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "R. Kristiansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the worst part is that actually I would go and shell out money for > that t-shirt. >  > we are such cultists :) >  > Best,  >  > Raymond M. Kristiansen > another verdi fan >  > On 8/29/05, Randolfe Wicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >   > > That image would make a great t-shirt.  > > SPONSORED LINKS  Rss reader  Fireant  Internet directory  Individual  Free rss reader YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Rss reader
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Internet directory
  
  


Individual
  
  
Free rss reader
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [videoblogging] Re: Consumer goods vloggers need!

2005-08-29 Thread trine bjørkmann berry


you guys all beat me to it. the vloggers are not *all* middle aged... having said that, i wouldn't wear (sorry) a vlogger t-shirt unless it looked really cool... and i am *not* middle aged  the problem with mouse pads are 1. a lot of people use laptops and *no* mouse and 2. it's not really advertising it/ spreading the word if you use a mouse pad in your own home. I return to badges and stickers. they're great!trineps. am i not supposed to get my own messages to this list (I don't!) or am i not properly registered...? or it this another irritating gmail bug?On 29 Aug 2005, at 18:49, Stephanie Bryant wrote:  On 8/29/05, Randolfe Wicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Devlon, I think the t-shirt market is very age-limited.  Those who look best > in t-shirts are usually in their teens and twenties.  Most vloggers are more > middle-aged.  I disagree. I think most vloggers are in the 20-30's range, but it doesn't matter; t-shirts are not age-limited. They look about the same on everyone, regardless of age. Shape has more to do with how a t-shirt hangs on a person.  > However, I think vlogging mousepads would have a universal appeal since all > vloggers use computers.  Heh. I don't use a mouse. I know many people who don't use a mouse. Mousepad=coaster in my house.  > The problem with t-shirts is you have to have them in three or four sizes.  Yes, that's true of any garment.  --  Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vlog: http://mortaine.blogspot.com Audioblog: http://bookramble.blogspot.com   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Rss reader
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Internet directory
  
  


Individual
  
  
Free rss reader
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [videoblogging] True Potential (was: rants about voting, Bush, and media screwups)

2005-09-07 Thread trine bjørkmann berry



this is an interesting article from someone trapped in NO at the time..

http://www.emsnetwork.org/artman/publish/article_18337.shtml


maybe of interest..?

On 9/7/05, Deirdre Straughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I wish there had been a large, loosely but passionately networked group of no-bullshit

vloggers who, in an organized and mutually supportive way, could have "activated" alongthe gulf coast to send one person into every New Orleans neighborhood with his or hercamera and a bag of minicasettes and batteries, and just stand in hip deep sewage every
day SHOOTING FOOTAGE ALL DAY LONG.If that had been the case we would RIGHT NOW be spending our time doing much moreconstructive things as video bloggers other than sitting thousands of miles away watching

Geraldo cry and arguing about whether George Bush is the devil.We would as a community be concentrating all of our efforts on retrieving, copying,editing, hosting, posting, archiving, indexing, and distributing thousands of hours of
footage in an unstoppable Mainstream Media runaround.
It's a nice idea in principle, but your example is too extreme. Anyone
trying to go INTO New Orleans would have been stopped, rightfully so,
by the authorities who were desperately trying to get people out. Going
into a situation like that makes you just another person who has to be
protected, which would be enormously irresponsible - you might be saved
at the expense of someone else who had no choice but to be there. At
least the large news orgs also have rented helicopters etc. to get
their people out - and even they were wisely staying out.

As for standing hip-deep in sewage - not as heroic as it sounds.
Especially two weeks after the fact when you start dying of
leptospirosis, typhoid, cholera, and other water-borne diseases that
you will have contracted in doing so. The longer you spend in that
water, the higher your risk. Most of these diseases have a 4-14 day
incubation period. The full horror of Katrina has yet to unfold. 

Citizen journalism is a fine ideal, but not worth putting your life at risk for.-- best regards,Deirdré Straughan
www.straughan.com (personal)
www.tvblob.com (work)





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Explains
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 

   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




  








-- + http://www.davidandtrine.org +


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[videoblogging] zadi?

2005-09-14 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
is karmagrrl gone??

http://smashface.com/vlog

Please say it's only temporary.

Trine


--- http://www.davidandtrine.org/ ---




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[videoblogging] FYI: Webcasting Treaty

2005-09-16 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
Hi,
Some of you might find this interesting??
best
Trine

Meeting:

WHEN: Friday September 16, 2005  from 10:30 to 11:30am

WHERE: Copyright Office, LM-403 of the Madison Building, Library
of Congress,
101 Independence Ave SE. Washington DC

RE: WIPO Webasting treaty

 The informal meeting is with Jule Sigall (LOC), Mike Keplinger
(PTO) and
   Marla
 Poor (LOC) at  Copyright Office, LM-403 of the Madison Building,
Library of
 Congress from 10:30 to 11:30 101 Independence Ave SE Washington DC.

 None of the people involved really care nor want to understand
how the
internet
 is working and they are negotiating a treaty which will give
webcasters (very
 broadly defined in the draft) exclusive rights to what they
"webcast", ie
text,
 images and combinations.  Basically everything we do on the net.
They are
 seeking to add a layer of rights to works (already covered by
copyright or in
 the public domain), rights that will give them economical power
but also
 control of distribution of works.  The copyright owners should be
against
   this
 new layer that will overlap with their rights... but as we
discussed, they
 recently changed their tune and are now quiet about the treaty.

 Note that this treaty is being pushed by Yahoo and Murdoch
(Commerce and the
 White house) and the US delegations has not had ONE public
consultation on
   the
 topic. I have been asking for public consultations for months and
just got
word
 that we could have a small informal meeting.

 The US delegation (and the EU now) are pushing for inclusion of
webcasters
into
 a more general WIPO treaty "updating rights of broadcasters"  and
the World
 intellectual property organization will be proposing a diplomatic
conference
 for this year at the General Assembly on Sept 28, 2005.  Once a
treaty is
done,
 it will move to the US and it will be most difficult to change
anything.

 Many of us thought that such a greedy and stupid move from the US
and EU
 casters would go no where... but it looks as if it is on the fast
track.
 However, It's not too late to listen to the US delegation
"explanations",
   ask
 them a few questions and request a public consultation with RFC
on the impact
 of giving webcasters exclusive rights on content distribution  
etc...



___
Discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://libresociety.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_libresociety.org




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video Podcasting? wtf :(

2005-09-18 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
or film blog. flog. hehe


On 18 Sep 2005, at 02:12, Randolfe Wicker wrote:

> With all this discussion of the need for simple terms, has anyone  
> considered
> using the term "moving picture blogs"?
> - Original Message -
> From: "andrew michael baron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 10:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video Podcasting? wtf :(
>
>
> This all hints at why terminology IS very important. If a term can
> make your friend get, when another term cant, there is something
> important there.
>
> Last night I heard a rally of women speaking out against John
> Roberts. Because he is against abortion, they were saying he can not
> continue to call them objects, they are individual human beings.
> Words DO mean a lot.
>
> I have complained that Apple calls "video podcats" -> "audioblogs".
> This just doesn't feel right. I would feel like a dope if I had to
> say videoblogs were "audioblogs".
>
> Feelings matter too.
>
>
>
> On Sep 16, 2005, at 10:31 AM, Bill Streeter wrote:
>
>
>> I agree with Eric, use what works.
>>
>>
>
> But Eric was pushing "video podcasting" as the term for everyone. -AB
>
>
>
>> Okay, I mentioned this a while back. I'm not a fan of the word blog.
>> It's really not a pleasant sounding word. Believe it or not a lot
>> of "civilians" I run into still have no clue what a "blog" is. So
>> when you start throwing terms like "video blog" or "vlog" you might
>> as well be speaking Chinese most of the time. I've given up trying
>> to explain what I do in those terms. When I do their eyes glaze
>> over. When I say "I put video on the internet" their eyes light up—
>> they get it. When I start talking about RSS delivery and enclosures,
>> I loose them again. When I say, "it's a video podcast," most of them
>> get it again. It may be incorrect, technically, to describe it as
>> a "video podcast" but what the fuck? It's close enough and, more
>> importantly, people get it.
>>
>> Example: There is a guy who has a record label that I've done some
>> consulting work for. I had a conversation with him about 9 months
>> ago about podcasting and video blogging. He's not a moron, and he
>> reads blogs and he's fairly technically literate. But I could tell
>> that he didn't really get it, I could see that the more I tried to
>> explain it the more I was loosing him...
>>
>> Skip ahead to about 3 weeks ago. I tell him he should open up his
>> back catalog to podcasters so the bands he's signed can get some
>> play somewhere. His eyes light up, he gets it now… and he tells me
>> about all the podcasts he's subscribed to via iTunes. I ask him if
>> he's checked out my video blog lately. He said he did recently but
>> missed some shit because he forgets to check it regularly.
>>
>> "Well," I say, "You know that it's actually like a video podcast…
>> you can subscribe to it via iTunes"
>>
>>  He gets really excited… "I didn't know they had VIDEO podcasts!!"
>>
>> "Yeah, of course" I tell him "there's no video ipod yet but you can
>> get the stuff downloaded automatically to your computer, in the same
>> way as a podcast, and iTunes plays video." And I explain to him that
>> he can subscribe in one click—pretty damn easy. Now did I know that
>> it was a slight mischaracterization to call it a "video podcast?"
>> yeah, but was I going to let that stop the conversation? HELL NO! He
>> was getting it!
>>
>> Obviously the new popularity of the term "Podcast" was the reason he
>> finally "got it."
>>
>> Vlogging, Vlog, video blog, video podcast… I'll use whatever works,
>> whatever people understand. Right now that seems to be "podcast" for
>> better or worse.
>>
>> Bill Streeter
>> www.lofistl.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Eric Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
>>>
>>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
 it sucks. sorry eric. it sucks. i dont like it for audio, i


>> certainly dont
>>
>>
 like it for video. an iPod and any mobile device is only one-


>> part of the big
>>
>>
 scheme of things anyways.
 i wont dare suggest a new word for audiocasts at this point


>>>
>>> I agree-- It is a lame term, and it splattered everywhere and
>>>
>>>
>> stuck. *hard*. I guarantee that
>>
>>
>>> the second the media gets hold of it, they'll do the easy and the
>>>
>>>
>> natural, and the learning
>>
>>
>>> curve is chopped to shit, because half of the phrase is known.
>>>
>>> More than likely I think we'll see that the terms get used
>>>
>>>
>> interchangeably. I'm compltely
>>
>>
>>> arbitrary when I use video podcast vs videoblog. If I'm talking to
>>>
>>>
>> consumers, I use VP. If I'm
>>
>>
>>> talkin to youse guys, it's vb (or if I'm lazy, it's vlog.)
>>>
>>> At least that's how my head works. Heh.
>>>
>>> ER
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
>> ~-->
>> Fair play? Vid

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Sound Effects

2005-09-22 Thread trine bjørkmann berry


free music (not effects) downloadable from copyleft record label Loca Records (http://www.locarecords.com)  - not loads and loads but good quality stuff. besttrineOn 22 Sep 2005, at 02:34, Jan wrote:  http://del.icio.us/love_detective/ccmusic  http://del.icio.us/love_detective/ccmedia  Some of my delicious tagged creative commons collections for your  entertainment.  Jan --  "It isn't done alone. Pay more." http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roadnode101/ - Road Node 101 http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - community http://the-hold.blogspot.com - literature . - Original Message -  From: "LeanBackVids.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:  Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 9:25 PM Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Sound Effects   > No need to purchase, there is free music out there... > http://www.archive.org/audio/collection.php?collection=opensource_audio > > -Matt > --- > http://www.leanbackvids.com > http://www.vlogmap.org > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, DrLinton Hutchinson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Anyone know of a site (URL) where one can purchase: >> 1. CD of Sound Effects >> 2. CD of Video Clips >> 3. Other suggestions >> >> >> With friendly greetings, >> >> >> Linton >> >> >> http://MostExtraordinary.Blogspot.com > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [videoblogging] final cut pro and mp3 files?

2005-10-03 Thread trine bjørkmann berry



i find converting to AIFF gets rid of the ticking sound. 

Audacity does this really quickly...

best
trine
+
http://www.davidandtrine.org


On 10/3/05, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I am playing with final cut pro for the first time

I imported an mp3 music file and when I drag it to the timeline and play it, all I hear are little beeps, not the song.

I imported a .wav file, which works fine

I can't believe that final cut pro would not work with mp3 files,
premier has not problem, so I'm sure I must be doing something wrong.
(By the way, the file plays fine in i-tunes).

Any help would be much appreciated.

... thanks ... richard-- Richard http://www.richardshow.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Typepad
  
  



Explains
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 

   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




  








-- + http://www.davidandtrine.org +


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Pete Townshend: Rockstar and Vlog Watcher

2005-10-11 Thread trine bjørkmann berry


I'm sure he *did* mean do a video review of his site, it would be wicked! well done!!On 11 Oct 2005, at 20:35, Ian Mills wrote:  the url is:  http://www.noservicecharge.com/videoblog/2005/10/ians-film-reviews-1-clockwork-orange.html#112886254890461491  I wasnt sure if he meant do a video...im not sure how that'd work. since it was 'Ian's Film Reviews'.  - Ian  On 11/10/05, Clint Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >  Because of Ian, I'm now at least 3 steps closer to Kevin Bacon. > >  Clint > >  Deirdre Straughan wrote: > >  > >  > >  > On 10/11/05, *Markus Sandy* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >  > > wrote: >  > >  > I chatted with Ian. >  > He said he's considering "nice" or "alright" for his review of >  > Pete's site >  > His parents are flipping out that he might respond in that way! >  > LOL >  > >  > >  > Ian's parents, like you and I, are old enough to know that PETE >  > TOWNSHEND IS GOD. I guess Ian's too young to be suitably impressed. >  >  He has definitely outcooled us all, and I am drooling with >  > jealousy. >  > >  > -- >  > best regards, >  > Deirdré Straughan >  > >  > www.straughan.com  (personal) >  > www.tvblob.com  (work) > > >  -- >  Clint Sharp >  New Media Guy & Technologist >  ClintSharp.com    Contact Info: http://clintsharp.com/contact/ > >  We are the media. > > > > > >  SPONSORED LINKS >  Individual Fireant Typepad >  Use > >   >  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > >  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. > >  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >  [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > >   >   -- www.the05project.com   SPONSORED LINKS  Individual  Fireant  Typepad  Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vloggercon 2006 NYC

2005-10-14 Thread trine bjørkmann berry


well, I am one of those interested in coming along, so would be good to get dates nailed down so  I can start planning... and saving money...also, some kind of program/outline might be useful, for those of us who can apply for funding to go... ThanksTrinehttp://www.davidandtrine.orgOn 14 Oct 2005, at 17:35, Jay dedman wrote:  >   I'm for keeping in NYC (for obvious reasons) but hope to not have it conflict with SXSW if at >all possible.  Vloggercon wont be the weekend of SXSW. we've spent little time planning as of yet. as we've said in the past, NYC is the place unless someone else wants to do the planning. NYC is good because its cheap to get flights from anywhere in the world. and we do have lots of floor space here.  after VlogEurope..I want to make sure our european vloggers can make it.  Jay   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [videoblogging] Reminder: Open Video Conference in June

2009-05-16 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
i am trying REALLY hard to get this one sorted.
Rupert, I think Virgin are doing "affordable" flights...

Trine


On 5/16/09, sizemore  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I probably won't make the conference itself but I am in NYC that week
> so if there's a bar you'll be frequenting do let me know :)
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Michael Verdi 
> wrote:
>> I'm going!
>>
>> - Verdi
>>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Rupert  wrote:
>>> Who's going?
>>>
>>> On 10-May-09, at 6:34 PM, Jay dedman wrote:
>>>
 If you've been trying to find an excuse to visit NYC this June, don't
 forget about the Open Video Conference. Be a very cool group of folks
 coming together. Time to sign up.

 Jay

 _

 The Open Video Conference (June 19-20 in NYC) is asking big questions
 about the future of video online.

 As the medium matures, we face a crossroads: will technology and
 public policy support a more participatory culture—one that encourages
 and enables free expression and broader cultural engagement? Or will
 online video become a glorified TV-on-demand service, a central part
 of a permissions-based culture? Web video holds tremendous potential,
 but limits on broadband, playback technology, and fair use threaten to
 undermine the ability of individuals to engage in dialogues in and
 around this new media ecosystem.

 Open Video Conference
 June 19-20, 2009
 New York City
 40 Washington Square South (NYU Law School)
 http://openvideoconference.org

 Bestselling author Clay Shirky will give a talk about the disruptive
 effects of the web. Harvard Professor Jonathan Zittrain (TBC) will
 moderate a discussion on industry perspectives with Boxee CEO Avner
 Ronen, Blip.tv CEO Mike Hudack, and representatives from YouTube and
 Adobe. Lizz Winstead, activist and co-creator of The Daily Show, will
 discuss web video as political commentary. Legendary hacker Jon Lech
 Johansen (DVD Jon) will address data portability. Mozilla, makers of
 the Firefox web browser, will highlight what it's doing to cement open
 video standards. You'll hear from Anthony Falzone—executive director
 at Stanford's Fair Use Project and counsel to graphic artist Shepherd
 Fairey—about the new battle lines drawn around fair use. Voices from
 the blogosphere, public media, and traditional media will explore the
 ways to make their content work in an open video ecosystem, and much
 more.

 This is just a peek—have a look at our schedule page for more details:
 http://www.openvideoconference.org/agenda

 In addition to two full days of high-profile programming, you can
 expect a slate of workshops and behind-the-scenes technical working
 groups with leading edge video developers from free software projects
 like: VLC, Ogg Theora, GStreamer, Blender, PiTiVi, Miro, Kaltura,
 Firefox, and many more. This event should interest anyone with a stake
 in art, culture, technology, policy, journalism, or online business.

 Organizers and partners include: Participatory Culture Foundation,
 Yale ISP, iCommons, Kaltura, Mozilla, Harvard's Berkman Center, Free
 Press, Creative Commons, and more.

 Register while there's space:
 http://openvideoconference.org/registration/


 

 Yahoo! Groups Links




>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://michaelverdi.com
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mike Atherton
>
> Saying the wrong thing since 1972
>
> Writer | Tech Hipster | 9 Kinds of Wrong
>
> http://www.sizemore.co.uk
> http://twitter.com/sizemore
>
>
> 
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 


twitter.com/trine




Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:videoblogging-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:videoblogging-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
videoblogging-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [videoblogging] Reminder: Open Video Conference in June

2009-05-20 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
argh, I just found out i won't be able to come (wrong time of year to
ask school for funding, apparently)

gutted!

Trine

On 5/20/09, Lauren Galanter  wrote:
> Definitely awesome with a side of awesomesauce.
>
> 
>
> Lauren Galanter
>
> www.laurengalanter.com
> www.linkedin.com/in/laureng
> 610-761-4435
>
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:54 PM, schlomo rabinowitz
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Actually, I think that now upgrades it to, as the kids say, Wicked
>> Awesome!
>>
>>
>> Schlomo Rabinowitz
>> http://schlomo.tv - finally moving to wordpress
>> http://hatfactory.net - relaxed coworking
>> AIM:schlomochat
>>
>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Richard (Show) Hall <
>> rich...@richardshow.org > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Now that is really awesome!
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Rupert
>> > 
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > since you're all so bloody awesome, i'm probably going to be forced to
>> > > come too.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 19-May-09, at 3:26 PM, Richard (Show) Hall wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > No YOU'RE AWESOME!!!
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:53 PM, schlomo rabinowitz
>> > > >  
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > AWESOME
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Schlomo Rabinowitz
>> > > > > http://schlomo.tv - finally moving to wordpress
>> > > > > http://hatfactory.net - relaxed coworking
>> > > > > AIM:schlomochat
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Richard (Show) Hall <
>> > > > > rich...@richardshow.org  > 40richardshow.org> > > 40richardshow.org> > > > 40richardshow.org>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Ok ... not only am I seriously considering going, but I
>> > > > registered, made
>> > > > > > reservations and everything ... so I am going, and it took me
>> > > > two emails
>> > > > > to
>> > > > > > say so ... see you there ... richard
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Richard (Show) Hall <
>> > > > > > rich...@richardshow.org  > 40richardshow.org> > > 40richardshow.org> > > > 40richardshow.org> > > >
>> > > > > 40richardshow.org>> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I'm seriously considering going.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > ...peace...richard
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Jay dedman <
>> > jay.ded...@gmail.com  > >
>> > > > 
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> > I was told the rooms are about $170/night with the group
>> > > > rate, so
>> > > > > I'd
>> > > > > > >> > be interested in a roomshare if anyone else is.
>> > > > > > >> > Are people planning on staying elsewhere? I want to make
>> > > > sure I'm
>> > > > > > >> > where the action is :-)
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> People are staying all over town...usually couchsurfing with
>> > > > friends.
>> > > > > > >> I know its expensive to stay in NYC. The hostels are
>> > > > considerably
>> > > > > > >> cheaper, but offer much less privacy.
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> You could make a page on http://
>> > > > videoblogginggroup.pbwiki.com/ if you
>> > > > > > >> wanted to start a place to find room sharing.
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> The event is at NYU...so Im sure all the after parties will
>> > > > take place
>> > > > > > >> in Lower East Side.
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> Jay
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> --
>> > > > > > >> http://ryanishungry.com
>> > > > > > >> http://jaydedman.com
>> > > > > > >> http://twitter.com/jaydedman
>> > > > > > >> 917 371 6790
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > Richard (Show) Hall
>> > > > > > > http://richardshow.org
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Richard (Show) Hall
>> > > > > > http://richardshow.org
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Richard (Show) Hall
>> > > > http://richardshow.org
>> > > >
>> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Richard (Show) Hall
>> > http://richardshow.org
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


-- 


twitter.com/trine


Re: [videoblogging] Keeping tapes

2009-10-06 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
adam,
someone like me will LOVE the fact you kept them.

maybe, in 80 years time, when i finally get around to finishing my phd, I'll
ask you for them. it'll be a historical project worth doing i think :)

trine

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Joly MacFie  wrote:

>
>
> That's a really nice site Pete, beautifully put together!
>
> I myself just moved my studio and turned up a bunch of tapes from when
> I ran shoutcast streams around the turn of the century, I've been
> steadily podcasting them at
>
> http://wwwhatsup.com/streamola/
>
> after which they hit the dumper!
>
> joly
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Pete Prodoehl 
> >
> wrote:
> >
> > I put my 20+ year old box of audio cassettes to good use...
> >
> > And you can see some of the results here:
> >
> >  http://www.mkepunk.com/
> >
> > I consider myself an "archivist" and "documentarian" which are fancy
> > words for "packrat" and "guy who doesn't throw things away... ever!"
> >
> > Sometimes you can only see the value of things later. Sometimes much
> later.
> >
> >
> > Pete
> >
>
> --
> --
> Joly MacFie 917 442 8665 Skype:punkcast
> WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
> http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
> --
>
>  
>



-- 


twitter.com/trine


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: NaVloPoMo 2009

2009-10-20 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
25th? or i could do the 29th at a push.
Trine

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Frank Carver
wrote:

>
>
> I'll take the 24th.
>
> Thanks,
> Frank.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>



-- 


twitter.com/trine


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Navlopomo chain game timezones

2009-10-29 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
rupert,

could you please post a link to the calendar again? i seem to have lost it..

thanks

trine

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Rupert Howe  wrote:

>
>
> My apologies - I'm being thick. Got it the wrong way round with Kath
> & Cheryl. It'll be fine. Will email offlist.
> R
>
>
> On 29-Oct-09, at 12:35 PM, Rupert Howe wrote:
>
> > Just wanted to clear up the timings because there was some concern
> > about the timezone issue, particularly from Australia, where they're
> > many hours ahead.
> >
> > I think in most cases, it will work to let people go up to Midnight in
> > their own timezone. Or even a little after.
> >
> > Most of the participants are in North America, so the time difference
> > isn't that great. Even those N Americans handing over to Europeans
> > will still deliver their videos before the Europeans wake up on their
> > assigned day. It'd only be a problem if a European is scheduled to
> > make a video on a certain day and wants to start making it the moment
> > that day starts - ie between midnight and 6am, and they had to wait
> > until the previous person reached midnight in North America.
> >
> > Perhaps it's best if each of you speak to the person who's before you
> > and following you, to work it out between yourselves.
> >
> > The only real problem I can see is with Kath - who's 11 hours ahead of
> > Ian, and 18 hours ahead of Cheryl. So she potentially wouldn't get
> > her video from Ian until 11am her time, and then Cheryl potentially
> > wouldn't get her video until 6pm Phoenix time, giving her only 6 hours
> > to do it! I'll send an email offlist between you, and see if we can
> > figure out a timing compromise.
> >
> > Any other big problems/clashes anyone can see?
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>



-- 


twitter.com/trine


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] navlopomo Day 25

2009-11-25 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
http://vimeo.com/7816609

Jen, all yours! :)

Trine


Re: [videoblogging] It's Done!

2009-12-01 Thread trine bjørkmann berry
I did 5 (oops) followed by the chain video, so 6.

in my defence I am 20 weeks pregnant! (for those who *didn't* email me
answers to my clues...) and still wonder :)

Trine

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Kath O'Donnell  wrote:
> sorry to hear about your Mother Ian, I didn't realize. your video was great
> inspiration for the theme so don't beat yourself up about it.
>
> I meant to do more in isadora/processing but didn't get time. was going ok
> for first couple of weeks then things got away from me and I missed a few
> days (some I took video but haven't uploaded yet) in the last couple of
> weeks. was a good nudge to remember to take the camera out, though next time
> I might stick to 12seconds or SD only as the HD ones are taking me forever
> to convert/save/upload
>
> great work everyone!
> kath
>
>
> 2009/12/1 Ian Beaumont 
>
>>
>>
>> Well, I'd set myself a target.
>>
>> I failed miserably. I only did 5 days of videos.
>>
>> However, I do have a reason.
>>
>> Just before everything was due to begin, my mother died in hospital. She
>> was 78. She'd been ill for sometime with C.O.P.D. As a result, my mindset
>> was never really in the project. I thought I would have the day I picked for
>> my contribution as a day off. But no, I was asked to work all day that day.
>>
>> As a result, my contribution ended up being a quick edit of old footage.
>> Not what I really wanted to do at all. And my plan to try different video
>> types and locations just ran out of creative steam far too early. It was a
>> great project though, and I felt that everybody elses contributions way
>> outshone mine. But, you know where my mind was.
>>
>> If I was a little more planned, I'd be doing "Countdown To Christmas"
>> videos as well. But my head and heart have not really been in it.
>>
>> Here's hoping that next year will be better.
>>
>> Ian B
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: mgmoon
>> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
>> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 7:16 PM
>> Subject: [videoblogging] It's Done!
>>
>> I just posted my final video for NaVloPoMo09 ... 30 Things in 30 Days.
>> It was a ton of work, it took up too much of my time, I'm backlogged with
>> other responsibilities, I'm glad I did it and I'm happy it's over.
>> http://mikemoon.net/vlog/2009/11/30/0130-north-carolina-memories/
>>
>> How did you do?
>>
>> Mike
>> http://vlog.mikemoon.net
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.aliak.com
> http://www.brisbanedancepartiesarchive.com
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> 
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>



-- 


twitter.com/trine