Re: [Vo]:ZPE-Casimir Inertial Drive UPDATE
Even at the fairly large element sizes chosen for performance estimating, this prospective performance is startling, though the example scale is too large to be maximallly effective. Using nano- technology the performance could be improved by orders of magnitude. For example, Casimir cavities of width less than 1/10 micron, 100 nanometers, would be necessary to achieve significant inertial mass reduction. This can be achieved by making smaller beams, but also by extending into parallel slits of width less than 100 nm, rows of planar protrusions from the beam, protrusions which are of less than 100 nm width extended from beams which are on the order of a micron wide. When this is done only a percentage of the pendulum mass is involved in actual inertial mass reduction, but, given the cubic power distribution of the zero point field, the effect should grow by at least the inverse square of the slit widths. The limits to advancement of technology of this kind are probably features on the order of 10-20 nm. Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Re: [Vo]:OT: The Abduction Rejectee Paradigm
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:02 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnsonorionwo...@charter.net wrote: Whitley Strieber has always described his encounters as encounters with visitors. I think it is an apt description. We don't really know who the visitors are, or where they come from. In my own opinion, (an opinion I fully admit has not been proven) what we do not know or really understand yet, is in what context the reality of Whitley's encounters are being played out in. As you surely recall in his books, Strieber describes one particular visitor that I find quite frightening. It is the cloaked dwarfs that make me think of medieval trolls. Their hooded garments sound like a monk's clothes. Terry
Re: [Vo]:ZPE-Casimir Inertial Drive UPDATE
The density of silicon is 2.33 g/cm^3, or 2.33 metric tons per cubic meter. A thrust of 8.3 metric tons per cubic meter then readily permits building a craft capable of sustained acceleration above 1 g, or 9.8 m/s^2. Even without doppler shifting of the zero point field, this will result in exceeding light speed in c/g = 3x10^7 seconds, or about 355 days, one year. However, the zero point field will likely be blue shifted, thus increasing its energy density and thus the thruster performance. Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
[Vo]:ZPE-Casimir Inertial Drive
From:
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ZPE-CasimirThrust.pdf
ZPE-Casimir Inertial Drive
Horace HeffnerJuly 2003
There has long been a search for a self contained infinite ISP
inertial space drive. Such a drive is possible if inertia is indeed
a zero point energy (ZPE), i.e. zero point field (ZPF) caused effect,
as proposed by authors like Hal Puthoff. I suggest that if the zero
point field can be excluded in part from a cavity, then inertia of
free-moving bodies in that cavity should be reduced. The Casimir
effect is produced by placing conductive surfaces close enough to
exclude some of the longer of wavelengths of the ZPF, which is
comprised of very short wavelengths. Plate separations greater than
atomic dimensions do produce measurable Casimir attraction between
conductive plates.
If the assumed principles are true, then an inertial drive can be
made by directing a jet in to a Casimir cavity that is bounded such
that the jet direction is fluidly reversed. A semicircular cavity
shape should work nicely, using an inert gas, like helium or argon,
as the propellant. Such cavities could be cut or etched into
sandwiched layers of ultrathin dielectrics separating structurally
strong metal layers. Alternately, they might be machined by electron
beams.
Fig 1. shows a cross section of a single ZPE thrust cell. An array
of roughly semicircular groves of width roughly on the order of to
10^-6 meter are cut into a metallic surface. These are represented
in Fig. 1 as the Thin Cavity. A matched array of thick groves is
cut into a strong low density faceplate that is placed over the array
of thin cavities such that a continuous gas path is formed from one
side of the plate to the other in each row cells, and the entire gas
flow (for a given row) is directed through the thin cavity of each
cell in that given row. The edge lateral walls of the thick
cavities, noted as the Cross Cavity Flow Barrier in Fig. 1, are
positioned so as to force the gas flow through the thin cavities.
The two plates make a 2 dimensional array of thrust cells fed by gas
at high pressure from the edges. The plates can be stacked to create
a 3 dimensional array of thrust cells. The plates need to be made as
light as possible, but the surface of the thin cell need to be
conductive in order to exclude ZPF radiation of some frequencies from
the cell.
The thrust cell widths might be on the order of 10^-5 m, and a layer
of cells on the order of 10^-4 m. This gives a cell density of about
10^5 x 10^5 x 10^4 cells/meter^3 = 10^14 cells/m^3. The cavity depth
might be about 10^-5 meter.
On each transition from thick cavity to thin cavity, the gas flow
transfers momentum to the walls due to the angular acceleration. The
gas snakes through the thrust cells. The momentum transferred in
the thin cavities is upward in Fig. 1. The momentum transferred in
the thick cavities is downward in Fig. 1. Since the same gas flows
through all cavities in a row, the mass flow for the cells is
identical. If there is no change of inertial mass in the thin
cavities, then no net thrust results. However, if the inertial mass
of the gas molecules/atoms is less in the thin cavities, then less
momentum is transferred toward the top of Fig. 1 by the gas when in
the thin cavities, and a net thrust develops downward in Fig. 1.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--
|
|
| -- ...
Repeated -
|/ \
| / Thin Cavity\
| / \
| /---- \
|| | |
|| -- v | Thrust
|| -- \| |
--^ \ -- |
/ v v
Gas -- / ^ | | --
| | Cross- |
| Cavity |
Thick Cavity | Flow| Thick Cavity
| Barrier |
| | --
Gas -- | | --
| |
-
|
|
Repeated --
|
--
Entire Thrust Cell Layer Repeated
|
|
v Thrust cell layers can be
Re: [Vo]:ZPE-Casimir Inertial Drive UPDATE
A thruster can be used to drive the armature of a generator. Suppose a thruster can only withstand 10 g's, or about 9 m/s^2 acceleration. Given velocity v, and radius r, we have acceleration a: a = v^2/r and: v = (a * r)^0.5 and power P is given by: P = f * distance/time = f * v = f * (a * r)^0.5 For a specific thruster we have f and a as given, so power is limited only by the length of the radius at which the power is applied. If we have an arm radius of 10 m, and f = 8000 kgf, and a = 10 g, we have: P = (8000 kgf) * ((10 g) * (10 m))^-2 = 2.46 MW With 10 arms per level, and 10 levels per armature that is 246 MW per armature. If thrust can be bumped up to 80,000 kgf per thruster, then the power output per armature is bumped up to 2.46 GW. Alternatively, the g force and radius can be made larger. A significant unknown here is the power required to drive the pendula, but given they are driven in mechanical resonance, the power requirement should be small. Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
[Vo]:PARALLEL(parent)DarkSpace~IS~TachyonCarrierWaveDARKENERGY
* * * TACHYON SPEED-DENSITY CARRIER-WAVE SPACE is 'AEXOVERSAL SUPER COSMOS DARKSPACE' and is most simply DARKENERGY SPACE: PROBLEM: ?How do you measure the SUPER Speed-Dense TACHYON CARRIER WAVE of the infinity of ALL WAVE LENGTHS is the vast spectrum array of the SUPER COSMOS? ?HOW DO WE 'MEASURE' the 'wave-length' of a DarkEnergy SUPER WAVE that propagates at a rate EXPONENTIALLY FASTER than the Speed of Light? AND THIS TACHYON DARKWAVE will be the PARENT DARKENERGY SPEED-DENSITY MEDIUM of EVERY OTHER POSSIBLE lesser-speed-dense 'wave-length' that can or every will exist. THIS TACHYON speed-density DarkEnergy WAVE SHEET thusly is ubiquitously infinite and moves SO-FAR/SO-FAST that its VERY WAVE CREST TO WAVE CREST spans 'distances' VIRTUALLY INFINITE relative to our ability NOT to be able to measure; and barely even 'guestimate.' BUT THIS TACHYON-DARKENERGY MEDIUM is (parent)SUPER-COSMOS INFINITE DARKSPACE itself whose SUPER-SPEED-DENSE-WAVE-LENGTH we percieve on our devices as a MERE UNI-SHEET OF BACK-GROUND NOISE. And thusly to-date/so far been missing the trees for the INCREDIBLY DENSE UBIQUITOUSLY PRESENT forest. Since this DarkEnergy TACHYON SUPER SPACE MEDIUM is the source and sustaining CARRIER-WAVE MEDIUM of the virtually infinite-in-number champagne LOW WAVE-LENGTH SPEED-DENSITY bubble-universes such as our own; IF in an 'imaginary scenario' the DARK-ENERGY TACHYON-SUPER-CARRIER-WAVE Super M-Brane of infinity were to CEASE, then ALL OTHER ENERGY FIELDS WOULD LIKEWISE evaporate. But so much for Sci-Fi. TACHYONS in 'fiction' as meandering herds of 'PARTICLES' is a NON-STARTER. But within our discoveries of ubiqui tous DARK-ENERGY as the TACHYON SPEED-DENSITY SUPER M-BRANE CARRIER WAVE; such will will provide the answers we have long sought to such as ZPEnergy the technologies of the future we as humanity SO LONG FOR. . . . Jack Harbach O'Sullivan _ Get your vacation photos on your phone! http://windowsliveformobile.com/en-us/photos/default.aspx?OCID=0809TL-HM
[Vo]:Shocking !
Forget getting Zapped by EEStor, etc. This one is more shocking in a number of ways - http://engineeringtv.com/blogs/etv/archive/2009/07/07/lightning-hybrids-hydr aulic-drivetrain-part-1.aspx yes - it is a hybrid BUT it does NOT use advanced batteries. Instead it uses hydraulics for energy storage. And it is a double hybrid since the small diesel is to be fueled by biodiesel. Carbon neutral. And especially notable, it excels in energy-recovery from braking - where even the Prius and every other hybrid is weak- like 30% or so. This gets back almost triple that. Also the mileage is double the Prius, and the carbon footprint is lower than any PHEV (without the shenanigans of battery packs that require lots of carbon to recharge, on average due to battery and line losses). Shocking indeed - they don't call it 'lightning' for nutin' ;-) Also, here is the aesthetic flash - its beauty, low drag, light weight and drivetrain logic almost strike one down, so to speak, once you get over the novelty of the different approach they are taking. How could Detroit have missed this? That was rhetorical. Detroit misses everything, almost. But how could California have missed it? Forget the Tesla with its sticker shock - this one has both beauty and brains without the big-bucks. . saving $30,000 on the lack of a battery pack alone. . nearly 100 mpg is available without batteries - making one wonder if all the emphasis by DoE on battery hybrids is not totally misplaced.
Re: [Vo]:Shocking !
These guys have had a lot of press in the northern CO area. The CEO used to run a local robot company that he sold. Ron --On Monday, August 10, 2009 2:39 PM -0700 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Forget getting Zapped by EEStor, etc. This one is more shocking in a number of ways – http://engineeringtv.com/blogs/etv/archive/2009/07/07/lightning-hybrids-hydraulic-drivetrain-part -1.aspx yes - it is a hybrid BUT it does NOT use advanced batteries. Instead it uses hydraulics for energy storage. And it is a double hybrid since the small diesel is to be fueled by biodiesel. Carbon neutral. And especially notable, it excels in energy-recovery from braking - where even the Prius and every other hybrid is weak- like 30% or so. This gets back almost triple that. Also the mileage is double the Prius, and the carbon footprint is lower than any PHEV (without the shenanigans of battery packs that require lots of carbon to recharge, on average due to battery and line losses). Shocking indeed - they don't call it 'lightning' for nutin' ;-) Also, here is the aesthetic flash - its beauty, low drag, light weight and drivetrain logic almost strike one down, so to speak, once you get over the novelty of the different approach they are taking. How could Detroit have missed this? That was rhetorical. Detroit misses everything, almost. But how could California have missed it? Forget the Tesla with its sticker shock - this one has both beauty and brains without the big-bucks. … saving $30,000 on the lack of a battery pack alone. … nearly 100 mpg is available without batteries - making one wonder if all the emphasis by DoE on battery hybrids is not totally misplaced.
Re: [Vo]:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 9 Aug 2009 21:00:22 -0800: Hi Horace, [snip] The following update has been appended to: http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ZPE-CasimirThrust.pdf If the assumption is made that all mass is due to the ZPE, then the change in mass can be calculated as the change in energy density in the cavity. This should follow directly from the dimensions of the cavity, and the excluded wavelengths. I think Hal already did this calculation in one of his papers, though I'm afraid I have no reference. There may however be another problem. The whole theory is based upon the exclusion of the ZPE in small cavities. However I suspect that this assumes that the walls of the cavity contain enough matter to effectively shield the cavity. If many minute cavities are placed close together, then this may no longer be true. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
Re: [Vo]:Shocking !
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:39:36 -0700: Hi, [snip] Forget getting Zapped by EEStor, etc. This one is more shocking in a number of ways - http://engineeringtv.com/blogs/etv/archive/2009/07/07/lightning-hybrids-hydr aulic-drivetrain-part-1.aspx [snip] . nearly 100 mpg is available without batteries - making one wonder if all the emphasis by DoE on battery hybrids is not totally misplaced. While a 100 mpg is not to be sneezed at, don't forget that in some cases a PHEV will not use any gas at all. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
Re: [Vo]:Shocking !
I have seen a few of these running around Atlanta, home of UPS: http://www.wired.com/autopia/2008/10/ups-hydraulic-h/ Terry On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Jones Beenejone...@pacbell.net wrote: yes - it is a hybrid BUT it does NOT use advanced batteries.
RE: [Vo]:Shocking !
-Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com While a 100 mpg is not to be sneezed at, don't forget that in some cases a PHEV will not use any gas at all. Well that is what I meant by shenanigans ... it is not credible to suggest that the PHEV is a good alternative to biodiesel - when the dirty coal plant that recharges the batteries is belching toxic pollutants out, megatons per year with line losses and battery losses and core losses and transformer losses and everything else... and that small diesel, in contrast, is very efficient and carbon neutral and far lower in pollutants. Never mind that solar or wind could in theory supply that energy necessary for recharging the PHEV - you have to go with the percentages, and it is not a pretty picture because of coal. The small diesel, fueled with biodiesel, and running at constant speed with an energy storage hybridized accumulator (batteries or hydraulics or whatever) makes much more sense for transportation than anything else - at least from where we stand in 2009 in terms of what is actually possible now. Of course, we all want the breakthrough (LENR, ZPE magnetics, fractional hydrogen) that ushers in a new paradigm, and which will probably utilize the same hybridized energy accumulator of the Lightning - but that breakthrough is not here yet. The bottom line is that a hydraulic hybrid (as Terry has noticed) offers a 50 percent increase in fuel economy and a 30 percent decrease in emissions, yet still leaves us wondering why the technology is less popular than bacon-flavored vodka. Jones
[Vo]:The Hum Explained! BY SCIENCE! (attn BillB)
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/08/hummingearth/ In an upshot, theres a constant roughly 10 millihertz hum worldwide, detectable by seisometers, that goes up and down. its created by... WAVE ACTION. that is, waves in the ocean. And its rise and fall and appearance in different areas inland is caused by storms and such moving main masses around. Thought some here might find that interesting, in comparison to THE HUM.
Re: [Vo]:The Hum Explained! BY SCIENCE! (attn BillB)
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/ --- On Mon, 8/10/09, Alexander Hollins alexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote: From: Alexander Hollins alexander.holl...@gmail.com Subject: [Vo]:The Hum Explained! BY SCIENCE! (attn BillB) To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 8:40 PM http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/08/hummingearth/ In an upshot, theres a constant roughly 10 millihertz hum worldwide, detectable by seisometers, that goes up and down. its created by... WAVE ACTION. that is, waves in the ocean. And its rise and fall and appearance in different areas inland is caused by storms and such moving main masses around. Thought some here might find that interesting, in comparison to THE HUM. Hum.. at first I was going to scoff in misbelief, but I see the Url corroborates this claim. Talk about low frequency this is very low indeed. A cycle of a millihz has a period of 1000 seconds, meaning if two opposite polarities as peaks were recorded as in AC, the detecting mechanism would see peaks every 500 seconds, or 8.3 minutes. I hate to think how long a radio antennae would need to be at quarter wavelength to receive such a broadcast, we might be talking planetary distances here. On a more serious note here over the years I have experimented with higher ferromagnetic frequencies above 400 hz and resonated large air core coils using a common AC car alternator driven at a constant rpm from household voltage to a driven AC motor to supply constant rpm to the alternator as that input frequency supply. In my earlier years all of my notes indicate that the input frequency was 480 hz. This frequency again is only dictated by pulley ratios diameters and the driving motor rpm. At that time I was using 80 lb rewound coils of 23 gauge wire, an astounding wire length over 9 miles I suppose, and over 60 Henry. At 480 hz the capacity to resonate was very small, near 2 nf which was simply made as a home made capacitor by using aluminum foil and plexiglass sandwiched between the foils. Many pictures and jpegs exist of these early days. But the thing about these large coil resonances was that when in operation at thousands of volts, the plates themselves I presume emitted a very loud HUM, which I figured to be a high pitched A notewise. Probably a doubled harmonic of the input freq of 480 hz? I also noted that when a transformer instead was employed for the voltage rise, it too seemed to emit this loud high pitched whine, and some old timers on the tesla list also noted that this happens in the early days of radio, and that EM bleeds into the sound spectrum ect. In those days I could even make a pitchure as water fashioned as the needed capacity to resonate and it would also hum, but not as loud, it was a muffled hum from puckered water. Now as the years rolled by all my assets were stolen during incarceration ect,, but I replenished my assets upon release by land sale, and in the reproduction of the principles I am now using 465 hz and 70 lb coils, but now absolutely no hum effects are occuring? I wonder if these devices are very frequency dependent for them to bleed out into the sound spectrum. In other work involving periodic repeating devices I have scoped out my woodpecker antennae device from the magnetic field of its sending coil and found that the neon atop the 25 ft tower blinks every three 60 hz AC cycles on positive peak for a frequency near 10.6 hz. The increase of voltage on these three AC cycles leading up to a neon ignition near 5ms duration can be seen on scopings with a 10 ms/div sweep rate, again a slow sweep rate barely able to capture both high frequency ringdowns within a single sweep. The frequency of the standing wave during the neon ignition is very low, in the 3600 hz range. Presumably this occurs because of the extraordinary long length of 8.6 miles of wound 23 gauge wire on the sending coil. Sincerely HDN
Re: [Vo]:The Hum Explained! BY SCIENCE! (attn BillB)
we ARE talking about geologic noise here. But i could easily see certain types of land features causing a changeover , increasing the frequency into something hearable. On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Harvey Norrisharv...@yahoo.com wrote: Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/ --- On Mon, 8/10/09, Alexander Hollins alexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote: From: Alexander Hollins alexander.holl...@gmail.com Subject: [Vo]:The Hum Explained! BY SCIENCE! (attn BillB) To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 8:40 PM http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/08/hummingearth/ In an upshot, theres a constant roughly 10 millihertz hum worldwide, detectable by seisometers, that goes up and down. its created by... WAVE ACTION. that is, waves in the ocean. And its rise and fall and appearance in different areas inland is caused by storms and such moving main masses around. Thought some here might find that interesting, in comparison to THE HUM. Hum.. at first I was going to scoff in misbelief, but I see the Url corroborates this claim. Talk about low frequency this is very low indeed. A cycle of a millihz has a period of 1000 seconds, meaning if two opposite polarities as peaks were recorded as in AC, the detecting mechanism would see peaks every 500 seconds, or 8.3 minutes. I hate to think how long a radio antennae would need to be at quarter wavelength to receive such a broadcast, we might be talking planetary distances here. On a more serious note here over the years I have experimented with higher ferromagnetic frequencies above 400 hz and resonated large air core coils using a common AC car alternator driven at a constant rpm from household voltage to a driven AC motor to supply constant rpm to the alternator as that input frequency supply. In my earlier years all of my notes indicate that the input frequency was 480 hz. This frequency again is only dictated by pulley ratios diameters and the driving motor rpm. At that time I was using 80 lb rewound coils of 23 gauge wire, an astounding wire length over 9 miles I suppose, and over 60 Henry. At 480 hz the capacity to resonate was very small, near 2 nf which was simply made as a home made capacitor by using aluminum foil and plexiglass sandwiched between the foils. Many pictures and jpegs exist of these early days. But the thing about these large coil resonances was that when in operation at thousands of volts, the plates themselves I presume emitted a very loud HUM, which I figured to be a high pitched A notewise. Probably a doubled harmonic of the input freq of 480 hz? I also noted that when a transformer instead was employed for the voltage rise, it too seemed to emit this loud high pitched whine, and some old timers on the tesla list also noted that this happens in the early days of radio, and that EM bleeds into the sound spectrum ect. In those days I could even make a pitchure as water fashioned as the needed capacity to resonate and it would also hum, but not as loud, it was a muffled hum from puckered water. Now as the years rolled by all my assets were stolen during incarceration ect,, but I replenished my assets upon release by land sale, and in the reproduction of the principles I am now using 465 hz and 70 lb coils, but now absolutely no hum effects are occuring? I wonder if these devices are very frequency dependent for them to bleed out into the sound spectrum. In other work involving periodic repeating devices I have scoped out my woodpecker antennae device from the magnetic field of its sending coil and found that the neon atop the 25 ft tower blinks every three 60 hz AC cycles on positive peak for a frequency near 10.6 hz. The increase of voltage on these three AC cycles leading up to a neon ignition near 5ms duration can be seen on scopings with a 10 ms/div sweep rate, again a slow sweep rate barely able to capture both high frequency ringdowns within a single sweep. The frequency of the standing wave during the neon ignition is very low, in the 3600 hz range. Presumably this occurs because of the extraordinary long length of 8.6 miles of wound 23 gauge wire on the sending coil. Sincerely HDN
Re: [Vo]:The Hum Explained! BY SCIENCE! (attn BillB)
On Aug 10, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Alexander Hollins wrote: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/08/hummingearth/ In an upshot, theres a constant roughly 10 millihertz hum worldwide, detectable by seisometers, that goes up and down. its created by... WAVE ACTION. that is, waves in the ocean. And its rise and fall and appearance in different areas inland is caused by storms and such moving main masses around. Thought some here might find that interesting, in comparison to THE HUM. I've often wondered if the Taos hum is due to synchronization of electric transmission lines throughout the western US. If you put water in a pan and tap the handle you see the waves converge amplified in the middle. If every electric motor, and every transformer around for hundreds of miles is synchronized, then the cumulative effect in producing sound could be large, especially if there is a large radius comparatively devoid of devices surrounding the hearing point and then a large circumference of active electrical devices. This makes me wonder what the Kepler might see on some distant planet surface. http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/08/08/space.kepler.discovery/ http://tinyurl.com/kqj93g If a well developed planet is using an electric grid, its distribution frequency will likely be in the 50-60 Hz range, the best trade-off frequency as calculated by Steinmetz for GE I think. If it uses an AC lighting system, perhaps the night side will show this low frequency amplitude modulation of its night lighting. I don't know if Kepler could detect this kind of thing, or the flashes of huge lasers, whether intentionally aimed here, or involved in laser wars... Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Re: [Vo]:Shocking !
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:54:41 -0700: Hi, [snip] -Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com While a 100 mpg is not to be sneezed at, don't forget that in some cases a PHEV will not use any gas at all. Well that is what I meant by shenanigans ... it is not credible to suggest that the PHEV is a good alternative to biodiesel - when the dirty coal plant that recharges the batteries is belching toxic pollutants out, megatons per year with line losses and battery losses and core losses and transformer losses and everything else... and that small diesel, in contrast, is very efficient and carbon neutral and far lower in pollutants. Never mind that solar or wind could in theory supply that energy necessary for recharging the PHEV - you have to go with the percentages, and it is not a pretty picture because of coal. The small diesel, fueled with biodiesel, and running at constant speed with an energy storage hybridized accumulator (batteries or hydraulics or whatever) makes much more sense for transportation than anything else - at least from where we stand in 2009 in terms of what is actually possible now. ...but if you are talking about what is available now, then you also need to consider that biodiesel is not yet available in large quantities either. I'm also a little leery of their claim to 85% energy reclamation during regenerative braking. When a fluid is compressed, it gets hot, and unless the stored energy is reused straight away (or almost), it cools off and loses that energy to the environment. Although I suppose that in stop start driving, the starting usually follows the stopping fairly closely. I agree that this is an interesting concept, however I don't think it should be adopted to the exclusion of everything else. I think all these new technologies should be encouraged. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
Re: [Vo]:PARALLEL(parent)DarkSpace~IS~TachyonCarrierWaveDARKENERGY
On Aug 10, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Harbach Jak wrote: * * * TACHYON SPEED-DENSITY CARRIER-WAVE SPACE is 'AEXOVERSAL SUPER COSMOS DARKSPACE' and is most simply DARKENERGY SPACE: PROBLEM: ?How do you measure the SUPER Speed-Dense TACHYON CARRIER WAVE of the infinity of ALL WAVE LENGTHS is the vast spectrum array of the SUPER COSMOS? ?HOW DO WE 'MEASURE' the 'wave-length' of a DarkEnergy SUPER WAVE that propagates at a rate EXPONENTIALLY FASTER than the Speed of Light? AND THIS TACHYON DARKWAVE will be the PARENT DARKENERGY SPEED- DENSITY MEDIUM of EVERY OTHER POSSIBLE lesser-speed-dense 'wave- length' that can or every will exist. THIS TACHYON speed-density DarkEnergy WAVE SHEET thusly is ubiquitously infinite and moves SO-FAR/SO-FAST that its VERY WAVE CREST TO WAVE CREST spans 'distances' VIRTUALLY INFINITE relative to our ability NOT to be able to measure; and barely even 'guestimate.' BUT THIS TACHYON-DARKENERGY MEDIUM is (parent)SUPER-COSMOS INFINITE DARKSPACE itself whose SUPER-SPEED-DENSE-WAVE-LENGTH we percieve on our devices as a MERE UNI-SHEET OF BACK-GROUND NOISE. And thusly to-date/so far been missing the trees for the INCREDIBLY DENSE UBIQUITOUSLY PRESENT forest. Since this DarkEnergy TACHYON SUPER SPACE MEDIUM is the source and sustaining CARRIER-WAVE MEDIUM of the virtually infinite-in-number champagne LOW WAVE-LENGTH SPEED-DENSITY bubble-universes such as our own; IF in an 'imaginary scenario' the DARK-ENERGY TACHYON- SUPER-CARRIER-WAVE Super M-Brane of infinity were to CEASE, then ALL OTHER ENERGY FIELDS WOULD LIKEWISE evaporate. But so much for Sci-Fi. TACHYONS in 'fiction' as meandering herds of 'PARTICLES' is a NON- STARTER. But within our discoveries of ubiqui tous DARK-ENERGY as the TACHYON SPEED-DENSITY SUPER M-BRANE CARRIER WAVE; such will will provide the answers we have long sought to such as ZPEnergy the technologies of the future we as humanity SO LONG FOR. . . . Jack Harbach O'Sullivan Poetry to my ears. Still, I think your physics may be a bit off. For what it is worth, here is what I think. Dark matter is principally mirror matter, which couples with real matter only very weakly, except it couples normally gravitationally. Dark energy is matter having negative gravitational charge, be it real matter or mirror matter. Gravitational charge is of the form +- i m, where i is the imaginary number which squared equals 1, and m is the mass. This then permits the gravitational law: F = G m1 m2 / r^2 instead of the traditional: F = -G m1 m2 / r^2 and this then is the basis for a beautiful isomorphism between the laws of gravity and electromagnetics which carries throughout physics. Negative gravitational charge carrying particles are created from the vacuum by black holes carrying positive gravitational charge, and vice versa. Particles having the opposite gravitational charge from the black hole's gravitational charge are expelled from black holes energetically. Particles are created from the vacuum in groups of 4, two mirror particles and two real particles. The mirror particles carry negative gravitational mass charges with respect to the black hole, the real particles carry ordinary positive mass charge with respect to the black hole. The real and mirror particle pairs each consist of matter and anti-matter within their respectively visible worlds. The negative mass charge mirror matter creates a spherical halo about its galaxy of origin. This neatly accounts for the anomalous rotation of galaxy arms and precisely for the success of the MOND equation, as well as many other phenomena. See: http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/FullGravimag.pdf My contribution to the universe as Touring conceived it. Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
