[Vo]:The History of the Internet, 1 minute video, Toni at WhoIsHostingThis: Rich Murray 2015.08.13
The History of the Internet. 1 minute video, Toni at WhoIsHostingThis: Rich Murray 2015.08.13 http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-history-of-internet-1-minute-video.html t...@wiht-email.com 9:31 PM PDT (1 hour ago) Thursday 2015.08.13 Hi Rich, The reason for my email today is to share with you a video presentation that we’ve put together which documents the history of the internet. You can watch the video here -- http://wiht.link/internethistoryvideo http://www.whoishostingthis.com/resources/internet-history-video/ [ Publishing 6791 user reviews of 335 web hosting companies since 2007 The Internet: Then Now In 1969, when the internet was nothing more than an intriguing military communication network, few could have imagined the far reaching impact of the then-budding technology. You don't need me to tell you how deeply integrated the internet is in our daily lives today. It is a communication and information highway. It is a way to distribute entertainment, and consumes more of our leisure time than we may want to admit. It gives voice to the marginalized and forgotten. It is the incubator of innovation. So how much has changed since the dawn of the internet age? Just about everything. We've pulled together a quick video that runs through some of the most staggering statistics available to describe the meteoric growth of the internet. Take a look: ] I can see you’ve covered the topic of internet history in the past so I think you might find this interesting and worth sharing with your visitors. Would you consider including a link to it on this page? -- http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/2013-February/019082.html I’d welcome your thoughts on the piece and do let me know if you have any questions. If I have reached you in error, please accept my apologies, just let me know and I’ll make sure I don’t email you again. Thanking you in advance for your time and consideration. Best regards, Toni i...@bifaloo.com [ http://www.whoishostingthis.com/meet-the-team/ Toni Toni goes under the omniscient title of 'webmaster'. That means she takes care of everything from modding the forum hosting reviews to writing content to beta testing to... you name it, Toni has done it to help us out! Based near Vancouver, Toni is a keen hiker, climber and outdoors explorer. In other words, she's living the dream. (PS. I just spent 20 minutes lost inside the wonders of her site -- check it Blifaloo.com ). Latest Additions Ramblings: (also see BlifalooD.com -- our boredom relief blog forum) i...@blifaloo.com ] Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com 10:40 PM (15 minutes ago) Hi Toni, Well, I'm 73... so would love a transcript with charts... I watched it twice, but it's about ten times too fast for me to take in. Also, who are you? Do you know me from 2008 to 2011 in Santa Fe FRIAM group and Santa Fe Complex? I did my 120-page senior thesis in 1964 for my BS in physics and history, about the exponential change from 1948 to 1964, moving from vacuum tubes to transistors to the first integrated circuits. I figured the arms race would burn us all -- a close thing, but here we are, sharing a remarkably positive probable stream of history. The fundamental key factor is God, as awareness expansion has also gone exponential, my actual focus since 1965. Google nonduality... Or phone or video Skype me, if you want to go through amazing changes quickly and easily, no fees. Today my partner Sondra and I shared over an hour of expanded awareness play on Google Plus Hangouts, for free, with a man in Hawaii and a lady in Cape Cod, from our little house in Imperial Beach, 10 miles south of San Diego -- the best of our 20 years together, as this is now our daily adventure: finderscourse.comramaji.org circleofa.org I daily check out the 20 articles from Phys.org site about critical innovations -- quantum computing with photons in integrated circuits made a huge jump today, a device that can do hundreds of original explorations into the subleties daily... doubling speed every 2 years for decades more, Intel silicon photonics now revolutionizing data centers, Michael Kassner: Rich Murray 2015.01.26 http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2015/01/doubling-speed-every-2-years-for.html [ See also: exponential information technology 1890-2014 10exp17 more MIPS per constant 2004 dollar in 124 years, Luke Muehlhauser, Machine Intelligence Research Institute 2014.05.12: Rich Murray 2014.12.27 http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2014/12/exponential-information-technology-1890.html since 1890, increase by 10 times every 7.3 years -- since 1950 -- 2014 = 64 years, with about 10exp13 times more = 10,000,000,000,000 times more per device, from vacuum tubes to multicore processors -- increase by 10 times every 5 years per constant 2004 dollar. CSICON -- Murray's Law -- Eternal Exponential Expansion of Science: Rich Murray 1997.04.05, 2001.06.22, 2011.01.03
Re: [Vo]:Re: Muons, SPP, DDL RPF
Axil, much better said than my relativistic warp via confinement but we are on the same page. IMHO even catalytic action is a weak form of this mechanism. I think catalysis is just the rate of change in low level dilation due to the tapestry of geometry in active regions. I think LENR is bootstrapped from an intense form of catalysis where the dilation factors reach relativistic levels and because they are based on an inverse square cube [Casimir or other London form] they trump the gravitational square law causing breaches in the isotropy that LENR exploits. Regards Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 10:05 PM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: Muons, SPP, DDL RPF The muon decays when a W- appears from the vacuum. This appearance is timed by the probability of the decay of the muon. But if the vacuum is energized so that it has an excess of positive vacuum energy. then the W- will not appear on time, it will be delayed.Excess vacuum energy slows down time. A excess of positive vacuum energy appears if a corresponding zone of negative vacuum energy is present. That zone of negative vacuum energy exists inside the SPP. Negative vacuum energy speeds up time a lot. This acceleration of time is why radioactive isotopes produced by fusion in LENR decay almost instantaneously. That is because the ash from a fusion event is entangled with the inside of the SPP in which all the energy of the fusion event is delivered. On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.commailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote: Jones, Eric and Axil-- I have been trying to understand the mechanism of muon decay, but am still in the dark. The muon is said to be a lepton—a primary particle not made of any constitutents—yet it frequently decays into three particles, including neutrinos that are normally not observed but inferred. The standard words explain that muon decays by a weak force interaction, however an interaction with what?—it’s not said. And what happens to a muon, if it is in empty space with nothing with which to interact? It seems W+, W- and Z^0 (0 charge) bosons, the carriers of the weak force, are involved, but do they appear at random from the vacuum to disrupt a free muon, causing it to decay? And why is the half life of a free muon so short? If a massive boson mediates the decay, what happens to the boson? Does it disappear back to the vacuum? The bosons are said to be very short lived--10^-18 sec. Bob Cook . From: Axil Axilmailto:janap...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:09 AM To: vortex-lmailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Muons, SPP, DDL RPF There are indications that Muons are extended in there lifetimes by Rysberg matter. The muons are produced for hours and days after the Rydberg matter is exposed to light. As referenced from the HolMlid paper as follows: The sources give a slowly decaying muon signal for several hours and days after being used for producing H(0). They can be triggered to increase the muon production by laser irradiation inside the chambers or sometimes even by turning on the fluorescent lamps in the laboratory for a short time. But in the experiment, the ability to extend the lifetime of muons is not open ended in time. There is a reduction of muon detection over time. If the ability for Rydberg matter to extend the lifetime of muons was open ended, the count of detected muons would reach a stable condition since cosmic muons arrive at a relitivly constant rate. . I believe that this ability to extend Muon lifetimes is rooted in the coherent superconductive nature of Rydberg matter. Furthermore, the mean energy of cosmic muons reaching sea level is about 4 GeV. Muons, This energy level is higher than the levels seen by Holmlid in his experiment. This implies that the muions seen in the experiment were produced locally by Rydberg matter. On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.netmailto:jone...@pacbell.net wrote: To paraphrase what Bob has said and cited, there is little possibility of a spin problem, when it is proposed that the SPP can extend the lifetime of muons (as opposed to creating them from nothing). I think that we all agree that “extending the lifetime” of a catalytic particle like the muon, where there is already a flux coming from the natural source – is functionally identical to “making” them anew. In either case, a higher population accumulates. Since any interaction with protons would happen within the geometry of the strong force, it is subject to QCD, and consequently giga-eV are in play, so the source of energy is no mystery. Proton mass is not quantized. In the end, until Holmlid’s experiment is better explained as something other than detection of muons in a situation where SPP are acting on dense hydrogen, he should be given benefit of the doubt. No? This would mean
Re: [Vo]:A 21st Century Case for Gold: A New Information Theory of Money.
hey Jed, in france it is not far from what you say of your past ! 8) 2015-08-14 1:49 GMT+02:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com: Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote: There are only two types of economies that have been demonstrated in the world: An economy which allows people to trade freely; and an economy which commands all production and distribution. To date, no one has demonstrated how the latter can replace the former. I disagree. All real world economies are a combination of the two. Hybrids, that is. With some freedom to trade, and some restrictions. For example, few people are allowed to trade in explosive materials, for the practical reasons demonstrated in Tianjin, China, yesterday. There has never been a time in history when trade and commerce were unrestricted by laws, licensing, inspection and so on. For example, the law governing beer purity (Reinheitsgebot) has have been force in Germany since 1487, more or less unchanged. (Although Wikipedia says it was rescinded.) There were extensive laws governing house and barn construction in Pennsylvania in 1750. Builders who did not follow these laws were run out of town on a rail according to an expert I know. He really is an expert: he repairs and rebuilds 18th century structures in Pennsylvania. He knows all of the codes from that time, as well as those presently in force. In U.S. history, over the last 200 years, the number of laws and restrictions to trade have been drastically reduced. We are now living in the golden age of unrestricted free market competition, unlike like any previous era. This is contrary to what conservatives believe, but it is true. You have to read a lot of original source history about boring subjects to understand this. For example, in 1800 all along the east coast, hotels were regulated to an extent that would be unthinkable today. The amount of money they could charge every night, the size of the room, and the exact menu of food they had to offer was set out in detail in the laws. In examples, up until the 1960s, lawyers and doctors were not allowed to advertise their services or post their rates; advertisements were not allowed to name their competing products (so they called them brand X); rates for trucks, airplanes and taxis were set by law; and established companies has trade groups that more or less banned the entry of competition. Also, the telephone and electric power industry did not allow competition. - Jed
[Vo]:help
[Vo]:Re: Muons, SPP, DDL RPF
Is the vacuum just another name for the Dirac Sea? If so it would seem that a strong magnetic field may direct the charged W bosons away from Axil’s wormhole, making it harder for the charged W’s to appear in the muon’s zone of space. The Z boson being neutral may not be so effected and still be able to appear as scheduled, based on its location relative to the wormhole. One interesting muon feature, based on theory and observations is that it has a property called hypercharge. It is a combination of charge and isospin (not the same as inintrinsic spin, but similar, I think). The value is a scalar quantity as best I can tell, like quantum numbers in a wave function. The density of the weak force bosons in the Dirac Sea—vacuum—may be responsible for the observed mean half-life of the muons. This may be a key as to how coherent systems juggle charge and spin, as well as their communication with the vacuum. Bob Cook From: Roarty, Francis X Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 6:38 AM . : vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Muons, SPP, DDL RPF Axil, much better said than my relativistic warp via confinement but we are on the same page. IMHO even catalytic action is a weak form of this mechanism. I think catalysis is just the rate of change in low level dilation due to the tapestry of geometry in active regions. I think LENR is bootstrapped from an intense form of catalysis where the dilation factors reach relativistic levels and because they are based on an inverse square cube [Casimir or other London form] they trump the gravitational square law causing breaches in the isotropy that LENR exploits. Regards Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 10:05 PM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: Muons, SPP, DDL RPF The muon decays when a W- appears from the vacuum. This appearance is timed by the probability of the decay of the muon. But if the vacuum is energized so that it has an excess of positive vacuum energy. then the W- will not appear on time, it will be delayed.Excess vacuum energy slows down time. A excess of positive vacuum energy appears if a corresponding zone of negative vacuum energy is present. That zone of negative vacuum energy exists inside the SPP. Negative vacuum energy speeds up time a lot. This acceleration of time is why radioactive isotopes produced by fusion in LENR decay almost instantaneously. That is because the ash from a fusion event is entangled with the inside of the SPP in which all the energy of the fusion event is delivered. On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote: Jones, Eric and Axil-- I have been trying to understand the mechanism of muon decay, but am still in the dark. The muon is said to be a lepton—a primary particle not made of any constitutents—yet it frequently decays into three particles, including neutrinos that are normally not observed but inferred. The standard words explain that muon decays by a weak force interaction, however an interaction with what?—it’s not said. And what happens to a muon, if it is in empty space with nothing with which to interact? It seems W+, W- and Z^0 (0 charge) bosons, the carriers of the weak force, are involved, but do they appear at random from the vacuum to disrupt a free muon, causing it to decay? And why is the half life of a free muon so short? If a massive boson mediates the decay, what happens to the boson? Does it disappear back to the vacuum? The bosons are said to be very short lived--10^-18 sec. Bob Cook . From: Axil Axil Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:09 AM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Muons, SPP, DDL RPF There are indications that Muons are extended in there lifetimes by Rysberg matter. The muons are produced for hours and days after the Rydberg matter is exposed to light. As referenced from the HolMlid paper as follows: The sources give a slowly decaying muon signal for several hours and days after being used for producing H(0). They can be triggered to increase the muon production by laser irradiation inside the chambers or sometimes even by turning on the fluorescent lamps in the laboratory for a short time. But in the experiment, the ability to extend the lifetime of muons is not open ended in time. There is a reduction of muon detection over time. If the ability for Rydberg matter to extend the lifetime of muons was open ended, the count of detected muons would reach a stable condition since cosmic muons arrive at a relitivly constant rate. . I believe that this ability to extend Muon lifetimes is rooted in the coherent superconductive nature of Rydberg matter. Furthermore, the mean energy of cosmic muons reaching sea level is about 4 GeV. Muons, This energy level is higher than the levels seen by Holmlid in his experiment. This implies
[Vo]:Re: Muons, SPP, DDL RPF
Eric-- The following is an interesting link about muon technology. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_spin_spectroscopy Bob Cook From: Eric Walker Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 6:12 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Muons, SPP, DDL RPF On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote: Also muomic atoms occur—a +muon and an electron. This sounds like positronium -- a positron and an electron momentarily bound together. The positronium system is unstable, and the most likely decay is for the two to annihilate one another, emitting annihilation photons in opposite directions. What is really interesting to me about the suggested +muon/electron system, or a muon/positron system, is that the masses are not equal. My intuition tells me that the matter/anti-matter combination should result in annihilation, but I'm really curious what the decay products would be. Eric
[Vo]:On Wikipedia, politically controversial science topics vulnerable to information sabotage
http://phys.org/news/2015-08-wikipedia-politically-controversial-science-topics.html
[Vo]:Re: ER=EPR and AMPS
Recently, I was watching an easy to understand lecture on YouTube titled ER = EPR, or What's Behind the Horizons of Black Holes? given by Prof. Leonard Susskind, director of the Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics. He was explaining how he resolves the AMPS paradox about the limitation a entanglement to explain manipulation of energy inside a black hole through wormholes. His explanation related to Black Holes explains perfectly how energy from a fusion event is sent into a SPP(an EMF Black Hole) as a consequence of entanglement. Susskind said that it would take science 100 years to recognized that his theory was true or not because there was no way to experimentally test it. He also explained how a black hole sends out entangling photons from black hole evaporation. This wormhole base energy transfer mechanism must also happen with SPPs. All this EMF from SPP evaporation must create an totally entangled environment inside a LENR reactor. This might explain why Rydberg matter is superconducting. I thought to myself that this energy transfer happens as a fundamental mechanism in LENR that can be experimentally verified. Susskind can resolve the structure of space time and connect quantum mechanics to general relativity and prove it experimentally using a LENR reactor. If only one of the LENR experimentalists would let down their proprietary dress and work with black hole science. Just imagine how far our understanding of the universe will move forward when science and LENR are reconciled. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBPpRqxY8Uw On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Physics beleives that it is impossible to experimentally demonstrate the resolution of the AMPS paradox. But this wormhole principle is demonstrated all the time in LENR. It is too bad that physics does not take LENR seriously. See ER = EPR, or What's Behind the Horizons of Black Holes? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBPpRqxY8Uw
[Vo]:LENR INFO FOR AUG 14, 2015
that's it: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/08/just-lenr-info-for-aug-14.html see you tomorrow peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Re: Muons, SPP, DDL RPF
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote: Also muomic atoms occur—a +muon and an electron. This sounds like positronium -- a positron and an electron momentarily bound together. The positronium system is unstable, and the most likely decay is for the two to annihilate one another, emitting annihilation photons in opposite directions. What is really interesting to me about the suggested +muon/electron system, or a muon/positron system, is that the masses are not equal. My intuition tells me that the matter/anti-matter combination should result in annihilation, but I'm really curious what the decay products would be. Eric
