Re: [Vo]:Program and Abstracts of the All Russian Symposium
>From a previous post except in part as follows: I have referenced papers here to show how the confinement of electrons on the surface of gold nanoparticles together with combination with light: a nanoplasmonic mechanism can change the half-life of U232 from 69 years to 6 microseconds. It also causes thorium to fission. See references: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F1112.6276&ei=nI6UUeG1Fq-N0QGypIAg&usg=AFQjCNFB59F1wkDv-NzeYg5TpnyZV1kpKQ&sig2=fhdWJ_enNKlLA4HboFBTUA&bvm=bv.46471029,d.dmQ On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Chris Zell wrote: > > > > > *From:* Steve High [mailto:diamondweb...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 12, 2015 8:41 PM > *To:* Vortex > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Program and Abstracts of the All Russian Symposium > > > > Yes, I have read the circumstances of his death but that does not answer > the basic question of whether his technology worked or not. If it did, > somebody out there should have been able to replicate at least part of it. > > > > The only evidence I ever heard of was a very old Sci Am article in which a > radium coated antenna appeared to generate a stronger reception signal > (although together with much random noise). I recall someone named > Moreland made claims similar to Brown but few details were published. > > > > There is an emotional component about random radioactive decay – as > anything contrary is usually brought up by Creationists. A classic paper by > Emery (Embry?) is usually quoted as exhaustively showing that absolutely > nothing can influence the rate of decay. However, I still wonder about > thin film layers and HV – also NMR effects. A physicist at American > University claimed an influence of 1 x 10 -5 power on Beta decay but I > never heard further about it. > > > > >
RE: [Vo]:Program and Abstracts of the All Russian Symposium
From: Steve High [mailto:diamondweb...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 8:41 PM To: Vortex Subject: Re: [Vo]:Program and Abstracts of the All Russian Symposium Yes, I have read the circumstances of his death but that does not answer the basic question of whether his technology worked or not. If it did, somebody out there should have been able to replicate at least part of it. The only evidence I ever heard of was a very old Sci Am article in which a radium coated antenna appeared to generate a stronger reception signal (although together with much random noise). I recall someone named Moreland made claims similar to Brown but few details were published. There is an emotional component about random radioactive decay – as anything contrary is usually brought up by Creationists. A classic paper by Emery (Embry?) is usually quoted as exhaustively showing that absolutely nothing can influence the rate of decay. However, I still wonder about thin film layers and HV – also NMR effects. A physicist at American University claimed an influence of 1 x 10 -5 power on Beta decay but I never heard further about it.
Re: [Vo]:Program and Abstracts of the All Russian Symposium
The story of why his invention was not carried forward is a bit alarming and sounds like a broken record... http://autoweek.com/article/car-news/strange-life-and-stranger-death-paul-brown-case-another-smart-guy-doing-dumb-thing On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chris Zell wrote: > Brown’s Resonant Battery would have been a wonderful invention, if it was > true. I get the impression that no one ever replicated his results. > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 11, 2015 4:52 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Program and Abstracts of the All Russian Symposium > > > > http://www.rexresearch.com/nucell/nucell.htm > > The Paul Brown Resonant Nuclear Battery is an ideal EMF harvester design > to take advantage the magnetic beams produced by the SPPs. The beta decays > usually used to produce the EMF need not be present since SPPs produce > magnetic power directly and act as ideal generators of EMF motive force. > Anyone who is interested in LENR should look into the theory and > engineering related to the Paul Brown Resonant Nuclear Battery. This > technology will still support the Cat and Mouse drive concept. Rossi is > realty something, How he thinks of these things is amazing. > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Peter Gluck > wrote: > > Dear Friends, > > > > 3 minutes after I have sent you the daily issue of EGO OUT > > this was published > > > > http://lenr.seplm.ru/konferentsii/opublikovana-programma-i-tezisy-rkkhtyaishm-22-kotoraya-sostoitsya-v-dagomyse-s-2709-po-04102015 > > > > > > It's the ICCF 19.5 Symposium. YOU CAN READ THE ABSTRACTS IN ENGLISH! > > Enjoy! > Peter > > -- > > Dr. Peter Gluck > > Cluj, Romania > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > >
RE: [Vo]:Program and Abstracts of the All Russian Symposium
Brown’s Resonant Battery would have been a wonderful invention, if it was true. I get the impression that no one ever replicated his results. From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 4:52 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Program and Abstracts of the All Russian Symposium http://www.rexresearch.com/nucell/nucell.htm The Paul Brown Resonant Nuclear Battery is an ideal EMF harvester design to take advantage the magnetic beams produced by the SPPs. The beta decays usually used to produce the EMF need not be present since SPPs produce magnetic power directly and act as ideal generators of EMF motive force. Anyone who is interested in LENR should look into the theory and engineering related to the Paul Brown Resonant Nuclear Battery. This technology will still support the Cat and Mouse drive concept. Rossi is realty something, How he thinks of these things is amazing. On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Peter Gluck mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear Friends, 3 minutes after I have sent you the daily issue of EGO OUT this was published http://lenr.seplm.ru/konferentsii/opublikovana-programma-i-tezisy-rkkhtyaishm-22-kotoraya-sostoitsya-v-dagomyse-s-2709-po-04102015 It's the ICCF 19.5 Symposium. YOU CAN READ THE ABSTRACTS IN ENGLISH! Enjoy! Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:Program and Abstracts of the All Russian Symposium
http://www.rexresearch.com/nucell/nucell.htm The Paul Brown Resonant Nuclear Battery is an ideal EMF harvester design to take advantage the magnetic beams produced by the SPPs. The beta decays usually used to produce the EMF need not be present since SPPs produce magnetic power directly and act as ideal generators of EMF motive force. Anyone who is interested in LENR should look into the theory and engineering related to the Paul Brown Resonant Nuclear Battery. This technology will still support the Cat and Mouse drive concept. Rossi is realty something, How he thinks of these things is amazing. On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Peter Gluck wrote: > Dear Friends, > > 3 minutes after I have sent you the daily issue of EGO OUT > this was published > > > http://lenr.seplm.ru/konferentsii/opublikovana-programma-i-tezisy-rkkhtyaishm-22-kotoraya-sostoitsya-v-dagomyse-s-2709-po-04102015 > > > It's the ICCF 19.5 Symposium. YOU CAN READ THE ABSTRACTS IN ENGLISH! > Enjoy! > Peter > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
[Vo]:Program and Abstracts of the All Russian Symposium
Dear Friends, 3 minutes after I have sent you the daily issue of EGO OUT this was published http://lenr.seplm.ru/konferentsii/opublikovana-programma-i-tezisy-rkkhtyaishm-22-kotoraya-sostoitsya-v-dagomyse-s-2709-po-04102015 It's the ICCF 19.5 Symposium. YOU CAN READ THE ABSTRACTS IN ENGLISH! Enjoy! Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
