[Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:"A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion‏" - Revisited

[Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint]

Mary Yugo stated/asked,

“Same response to the same repetition of absolute nonsense about Rossi and
Defkalion.  You always seem to object to my response but not to the inanity
that spawned it.  Why do you think that is?”

 

That’s easy… and I’ve explained it to you before.

I have stated my reservations (more than once) about the whole affair 6
months ago;  and because I try to abide by the guidelines of this forum, I
don’t want to repeat what I have already stated.  What part of that don’t
you understand?

-Mark

 

From: Mary Yugo [mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 10:36 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:"A competent observer's assessment of
Defkalion‏" - Revisited

 

 

2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint 

Mary Yugo stated, for the millionth time,

“A much better theory is that, as Rossi says, they have nothing to show.”

 

Same old tired repetition, despite numerous requests that you avoid it.  You
just never learn…

Is there really a brain behind the name or is it just a very poor
implementation of Artificial Intelligence responding to vortex posts?  If
AI, then the programmer forgot to #include 

-Mark


Same response to the same repetition of absolute nonsense about Rossi and
Defkalion.  You always seem to object to my response but not to the inanity
that spawned it.  Why do you think that is? 

 

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:"A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion‏" - Revisited

[Stephen A. Lawrence]

On 12-01-04 01:35 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:



2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint >


Mary Yugo stated, for the millionth time,

“A much better theory is that, as Rossi says, they have nothing to
show.”

Same old tired repetition, despite numerous requests that you
avoid it.  You just never learn…

Is there really a brain behind the name or is it just a very poor
implementation of Artificial Intelligence responding to vortex
posts?  If AI, then the programmer forgot to #include 

-Mark


Same response to the same repetition of absolute nonsense about Rossi 
and Defkalion.  You always seem to object to my response but not to 
the inanity that spawned it.  Why do you think that is?


Same old Mark.  He hasn't changed.  If you're skeptical, you get ad 
hominems.


I've been filtering out his messages ever since he responded to a 
comment of mine regarding Naudin's results with a not particularly 
incisive argument to the effect that I was "pathetic".


Mary, regardless of whether you're a woman, a man, or a chatterbot (or, 
for that matter, somebody's pet chinchilla which has learned how to 
type, as well as how to do calorimetry), you're very probably wasting 
your time by arguing with Mark.  (The last two seem pretty unlikely, of 
course.)

Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:"A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion‏" - Revisited

[Charles Hope]

You've already told her to shut up several times, so that's repetitive and 
boring as well. 




On Jan 4, 2012, at 13:48, "Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint"  
wrote:

> Mary Yugo stated/asked,
> “Same response to the same repetition of absolute nonsense about Rossi and 
> Defkalion.  You always seem to object to my response but not to the inanity 
> that spawned it.  Why do you think that is?”
>  
> That’s easy… and I’ve explained it to you before.
> I have stated my reservations (more than once) about the whole affair 6 
> months ago;  and because I try to abide by the guidelines of this forum, I 
> don’t want to repeat what I have already stated.  What part of that don’t you 
> understand?
> -Mark
>  
> From: Mary Yugo [mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 10:36 AM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:"A competent observer's assessment of 
> Defkalion‏" - Revisited
>  
>  
> 
> 2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint 
> Mary Yugo stated, for the millionth time,
> “A much better theory is that, as Rossi says, they have nothing to show.”
>  
> Same old tired repetition, despite numerous requests that you avoid it.  You 
> just never learn…
> Is there really a brain behind the name or is it just a very poor 
> implementation of Artificial Intelligence responding to vortex posts?  If AI, 
> then the programmer forgot to #include 
> -Mark
> 
> Same response to the same repetition of absolute nonsense about Rossi and 
> Defkalion.  You always seem to object to my response but not to the inanity 
> that spawned it.  Why do you think that is?
>  

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:"A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion‏" - Revisited

[Mary Yugo]

2012/1/4 Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint 

> Mary Yugo stated/asked,
>
> “Same response to the same repetition of absolute nonsense about Rossi
> and Defkalion.  You always seem to object to my response but not to the
> inanity that spawned it.  Why do you think that is?”
>
> ** **
>
> That’s easy… and I’ve explained it to you before.
>
> I have stated my reservations (more than once) about the whole affair 6
> months ago;  and because I try to abide by the guidelines of this forum, I
> don’t want to repeat what I have already stated.  What part of that don’t
> you understand?
>

I am not responding to your repetition.  I didn't allege that you repeat
yourself.  I am responding to other people who make the same specious
claims and assumptions over and over again.  You don't seem to mind THEIR
repetitions.  Obviously, what bothers you the most is people who make
cogent arguments that Rossi and Defkalion may be lying and scamming.

[Vo]:RE: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:"A competent observer's assessment of Defkalion‏" - Revisited

[Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint]

Charles Hope said,

“You've already told her to shut up several times, so that's repetitive and 
boring as well.”

 

I have never told her to “shut up”…

I have only requested that she not repeat lengthy explanations; that she should 
simply state that she disagrees and provide the link to previous postings which 
have her comments/explanations.

-m

 

From: Charles Hope [mailto:lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 11:01 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:"A competent observer's assessment 
of Defkalion‏" - Revisited