Re: [Vo]:Rossi Rides into Sunset : answered a few questions from the saddle
On Defkalion : The following message was posted (waiting for moderation) in Journal of Nuclear Physics: Our congratulations to Andrea Rossi. Defkalion Green Technologies SA (Not yet posted on JNP_.
Re: [Vo]:Rossi Rides into Sunset : answered a few questions from the saddle
T.R. October 31st, 2011 at 9:47 AM Dear mr. Rossi when the second customer will recive his plant? Andrea Rossi October 31st, 2011 at 10:44 AM Dear T.R. 3 months, Warm regards, A.R. . . . . G P October 31st, 2011 at 11:17 AM Dear Mr. Rossi, I have followed for some time with passion and hope your endeavours, and hope you will be able to change things for the better. If you have time could you let me know: 1- How will you be able to build between 30 to 100 plants in 2012 if it is going to take 3 months to deliver the second one. 2- Is the second customer requiring the same level of secrecy as the first one? I am asking you this because all the skeptics/snakes will argue that you are just buying more time here (without any real buyer in sight), so if you dont have a nondisclosure agreement as strict as the one with the first customer, you would be doing yourself and all people that are supporting you a great favour giving a little more detail. Thank you in advance for the consideration. G P Andrea Rossi October 31st, 2011 at 11:20 AM Dear GP: 1- we are ready for 30-100 units per year 2- no Warm regards, A.R. - - - - - Andrea Rossi October 31st, 2011 at 12:37 PM Dear Strat: we sell the 1 MW plants at 2000 Euro/kW. [ $2,786,606 each ] Warm Regards, A.R.
Re: [Vo]:Rossi Rides into Sunset : answered a few questions from the saddle
# Hampus October 30th, 2011 at 3:54 PM Hi Great work. 1. How many 1 megawatt plants can you sell in one year do you think? 2. When is the next sell? 3. When will the home plants be available for pursued? I know time is of the essence, that’s why my questions are so rash. Thanks for you answers the mean alot for me. Hampus Ericsson # Andrea Rossi October 30th, 2011 at 5:56 PM Dear Hampus: 1- From 30 to 100 for the first year is what we are already ready to make, but we will get exponentially faster in time 2- done 3- this is a more complicated issue, because we need complex certifications Warm Regards, A.R. --- # # Serdar S. Celebi October 30th, 2011 at 8:15 AM Dear Dr. Rossi, We, Turkish cold fusion team – in 1989, are interested in your E-Cat system and specially in the test results of 1 MW E-Cat unit. According to the first evaluation of your results on 28th October 2011, it seems that you are successful even if you get approximately the half of the suggested amount- 1MW- . But at this point, I have some questions to make the matter clear. From the viewpoints of engineering and economics, as you know the evaluation of the efficiency of the system should be made overall. I mean, 1.What is the magnitude of the energy that is consumed for providing Ni/Catalyst system (probably including the supplement of electromagnetic wave) which is used in your process? This energy should be considered in the calculation of overall energy efficiency of the system if the amount of that energy is not negligible compared to energy input -as heat- to the unit at initial. This point can be very important if a special synthetic isotope of Nickel is used or formed in your process at initial and also if the activity life time /stability of Ni- Catalyst is low. 2.What is production/operation cost of Ni/Catalyst system and also what is it’s activity life time? And specially the cost of this catalyst on the base of it’s active life time (hydrogen cost can be neglected) should be taken into account for unit cost of energy output in your unit. Thank you very much for your response in advance. Kind regards, Prof. Serdar S. Celebi (Ph.D. in Chemical Eng.) # Andrea Rossi October 30th, 2011 at 2:39 PM Dear Prof. Serdar S. Celebi: 1- About 200 Wh/MW 2- 1 Euro/MW Warm Regards, A.R.
[Vo]:Rossi Rides into Sunset
Andrea Rossi October 29th, 2011 at 12:07 PM Dear Devis, Of course I will remember always all the friends who have encouraged the efforts of my team and mine. I thank all with all my heart, and this is dedicated also to all the Friends who have sent all these comments, so heart warming, to which I can’t answer, being again under pressure. A big, big hug to all. Andrea Rossi So, what did he gain? Did he get the big bucks? What did he sell? The future of mankind? To whom did he sell it? Big oil? Military? Sounds like a good bye. I guess he rides away with his satchel full of gold. Will he give the funds to childhood cancer like he promised? Or was that all a shill? And what of the rest of the world? Will Defkalion rise like the Phoenix with a variation on the Rossi Reactor? Stay tuned. T
Re: [Vo]:Rossi Rides into Sunset : answered a few questions from the saddle
James Bowery October 29th, 2011 at 11:40 AM What was the pressure at the output thermocouple? Why the electric power generator (genset) has not been turned off during the self sustained mode? Andrea Rossi October 29th, 2011 at 11:46 AM Dear James Bowery: max 20 mm in water column was the pressure at the output of the thermocouple. The genset has been not turned off because we had to give energy to all the auxiliary motors: water pumps and electric fans of the heat dissipators. Of course the energy consumed from these utilities has not to be put in the energy balance of the reactors, because in an industrial application the energy is not dissipated, is utilized, and the pumps to move the water are necessary in this particular kind of test. In any case, all this is described in the draft report on http://db.tt/wu4OLbgk Warm Regards, A.R. - - - - - - Either he's lying, or 104 C steam was superheated -- and 100% Dry. Probably a few of the eCats were under-powered, so their input water overflowed --- giving the liquid water that was collected at the outlet.
