RE: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
Axil, I may have missed it, but how do you account for the short lifetime of the muon and why is that signature not showing up? The muon is unstable with a lifetime of 2.2 microseconds (2.197×10^−6 sec) and since they have a mass much larger than an electron, but decay to an electron and neutrino, the decay is energetic. If lots of them were being produced, then there should be a primary and secondary radiation signature – bremsstrahlung - from the thermalization of decay electrons. This signature is known, and if seen would validate your hypothesis. From: Axil Axil Posts combined revised and extended as follows: The appearance of muons in the LENR reaction are explained by SPP theory. Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the E-cat World blog over many months. With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate 6 MeV enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as explained in the SPP theory. In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). As explained here before on this site, nuclear energy from fusion is carried to the SPP soliton via worm holes via teleportation and transformed into increased photonic energy and associated increases in an anapole magnetic field that produces muons through the Schwinger effect. http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html The positive feedback loop between fusion reactions and production of magnetic fields and entanglement results is a transfer of that energy derived from fusion into the production of mesons, muons, pions and other subatomic particles. One result of this conversion of fusion based nuclear energy is the production of electrons from the decay of muons. We have suspected this electron production mechanism as informed from comments Rossi has made about his observation of electrical power production from the E-Cat. The Cat/Mouse interface may be using muons produced by the Mouse to activate the LENR reactions in the Cats when the Cats surround the Mouse to capture most of the Muon flux. On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: As explained here before on this site, nuclear energy from fusion is carried to the SPP soliton via worm holes via teleportation and transformed into increased photonic energy and associated increases in an anapole magnetic field that produces muons through the Schwinger effect. http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as explained in the SPP theory. In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of
Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
I will reread Leif Holmlid muon paper again with your comments in mind to see if there is any observations that shed light on your posits. On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Axil, I may have missed it, but how do you account for the short lifetime of the muon and why is that signature not showing up? The muon is unstable with a lifetime of 2.2 microseconds (2.197×10^−6 sec) and since they have a mass much larger than an electron, but decay to an electron and neutrino, the decay is energetic. If lots of them were being produced, then there should be a primary and secondary radiation signature – bremsstrahlung - from the thermalization of decay electrons. This signature is known, and if seen would validate your hypothesis. *From:* Axil Axil Posts combined revised and extended as follows: The appearance of muons in the LENR reaction are explained by SPP theory. Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the E-cat World blog over many months. With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate 6 MeV enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as explained in the SPP theory. In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). As explained here before on this site, nuclear energy from fusion is carried to the SPP soliton via worm holes via teleportation and transformed into increased photonic energy and associated increases in an anapole magnetic field that produces muons through the Schwinger effect. http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html The positive feedback loop between fusion reactions and production of magnetic fields and entanglement results is a transfer of that energy derived from fusion into the production of mesons, muons, pions and other subatomic particles. One result of this conversion of fusion based nuclear energy is the production of electrons from the decay of muons. We have suspected this electron production mechanism as informed from comments Rossi has made about his observation of electrical power production from the E-Cat. The Cat/Mouse interface may be using muons produced by the Mouse to activate the LENR reactions in the Cats when the Cats surround the Mouse to capture most of the Muon flux. On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: As explained here before on this site, nuclear energy from fusion is carried to the SPP soliton via worm holes via teleportation and transformed into increased photonic energy and associated increases in an anapole magnetic field that produces muons through the Schwinger effect. http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: *Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as explained in the SPP theory.In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). * On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Axil Axil
RE: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
The problem with Holmlid’s work is that he uses an extremely small amount of reactant – trillions of times less than in a Rossi reactor. This tiny scale makes it very difficult to extrapolate what he is doing to a larger size. Holmlid’s work looks like a miniature NOVA/NIF hot fusion device (Livermore Lab) more than it resembles LENR. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova_%28laser%29 …since the input and output are hot, and only the target is cold (which is the same general situation at LLNL). I have no problem with calling Holmlid’s work LENR if - when it is scaled-up, the radiation level does not also scale-up to the toxic level – which it arguably would with massively more 13 MeV “particles” – whatever they are. The one and only defining characteristic for LENR - should be this: gain above chemical levels, with acceptably low ionizing radiation. No one cares about the power input being a laser, or a SPP chip, nor whether the reactor is glowing, so long as it is safe. From: Axil Axil I will reread Leif Holmlid muon paper again with your comments in mind to see if there is any observations that shed light on your posits. Jones Beene wrote: Axil, I may have missed it, but how do you account for the short lifetime of the muon and why is that signature not showing up? The muon is unstable with a lifetime of 2.2 microseconds (2.197×10^−6 sec) and since they have a mass much larger than an electron, but decay to an electron and neutrino, the decay is energetic. If lots of them were being produced, then there should be a primary and secondary radiation signature – bremsstrahlung - from the thermalization of decay electrons. This signature is known, and if seen would validate your hypothesis. From: Axil Axil Posts combined revised and extended as follows: The appearance of muons in the LENR reaction are explained by SPP theory. Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter
Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
http://www.i2u2.org/elab/cosmic/posters/display.jsp?name=poster.lead.cool.man.data The Effects of Lead Shielding on Muon Counts If you are near a LENR reactor, tt looks like lots of muons will get to and into the body. I wonder if muons are harmful? On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: The problem with Holmlid’s work is that he uses an extremely small amount of reactant – trillions of times less than in a Rossi reactor. This tiny scale makes it very difficult to extrapolate what he is doing to a larger size. Holmlid’s work looks like a miniature NOVA/NIF hot fusion device (Livermore Lab) more than it resembles LENR. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova_%28laser%29 …since the input and output are hot, and only the target is cold (which is the same general situation at LLNL). I have no problem with calling Holmlid’s work LENR if - when it is scaled-up, the radiation level does not also scale-up to the toxic level – which it arguably would with massively more 13 MeV “particles” – whatever they are. The one and only defining characteristic for LENR - should be this: gain above chemical levels, with acceptably low ionizing radiation. No one cares about the power input being a laser, or a SPP chip, nor whether the reactor is glowing, so long as it is safe. *From:* Axil Axil I will reread Leif Holmlid muon paper again with your comments in mind to see if there is any observations that shed light on your posits. Jones Beene wrote: Axil, I may have missed it, but how do you account for the short lifetime of the muon and why is that signature not showing up? The muon is unstable with a lifetime of 2.2 microseconds (2.197×10^−6 sec) and since they have a mass much larger than an electron, but decay to an electron and neutrino, the decay is energetic. If lots of them were being produced, then there should be a primary and secondary radiation signature – bremsstrahlung - from the thermalization of decay electrons. This signature is known, and if seen would validate your hypothesis. *From:* Axil Axil Posts combined revised and extended as follows: The appearance of muons in the LENR reaction are explained by SPP theory. Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter
RE: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
From: Axil Axil * http://www.i2u2.org/elab/cosmic/posters/display.jsp?name=poster.lead.cool.man.data * The Effects of Lead Shielding on Muon Counts…. If you are near a LENR reactor, tt looks like lots of muons will get to and into the body. I wonder if muons are harmful? Aside from the possible (likely) harm from muons, the curious and disturbing thing about this paper is that the authors: 1) expected to see a decreasing rate of muon counts as more lead above the detectors was added, 2) They were extremely surprised to see that when going from 15cm to 20cm of lead, the count rate of muons actually increased 3) This data point was extremely unexpected. They had expected that the rate of decrease of the muon count rates would have slowed, but the last thing expected was for the count rates to actually increase. That is a lot of lead, first of all. Even then, it never blocked all the muons. For the muon count to increase, with thicker lead, this means that some kind of chain reaction is happening above a thickness level, but muon keep progressing thought the metal. As an analogy – (of how LENR could benefit from this) consider the known parameters of fission … a chain reaction of neutrons is the driver of fission reactors, and thus the concept of a chain reaction of muons is intriguing. Can muons be harvested? As for using this information in a practical manner, the main problem is that tons of lead would be needed for even a small reactor - and in the end – the question is whether they can be converted into energy.
Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
The flow of Muons from the Mouse into the Cats in Rossi's Self Sustain mode (SSM) configuration looks like an application of a muon chain reaction that you speculate about. We will need to watch Rossi to see what type of health problems he develops from his time inside the shipping container. Someone should tell Rossi about the possiblity of muons comming out of his reactor then ask Rossi how he will deal with the muon flux coming out of his reactor On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: *From:* Axil Axil Ø *http://www.i2u2.org/elab/cosmic/posters/display.jsp?name=poster.lead.cool.man.data* http://www.i2u2.org/elab/cosmic/posters/display.jsp?name=poster.lead.cool.man.data Ø The Effects of Lead Shielding on Muon Counts…. If you are near a LENR reactor, tt looks like lots of muons will get to and into the body. I wonder if muons are harmful? Aside from the possible (likely) harm from muons, the curious and disturbing thing about this paper is that the authors: 1) expected to see a decreasing rate of muon counts as more lead above the detectors was added, 2) They were extremely surprised to see that when going from 15cm to 20cm of lead, the count rate of muons actually increased 3) This data point was extremely unexpected. They had expected that the rate of decrease of the muon count rates would have slowed, but the last thing expected was for the count rates to actually increase. That is a lot of lead, first of all. Even then, it never blocked all the muons. For the muon count to increase, with thicker lead, this means that some kind of chain reaction is happening above a thickness level, but muon keep progressing thought the metal. As an analogy – (of how LENR could benefit from this) consider the known parameters of fission … a chain reaction of neutrons is the driver of fission reactors, and thus the concept of a chain reaction of muons is intriguing. Can muons be harvested? As for using this information in a practical manner, the main problem is that tons of lead would be needed for even a small reactor - and in the end – the question is whether they can be converted into energy.
Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
http://www.theguardian.com/science/life-and-physics/2011/may/14/1 Muons are harmless...thank goodness. On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: As a wsy to shield muon radiation, the LENR reactor could be buried underground in a silo with the depth of the hole determined by the health effects produced by the expected muon flux. On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: The flow of Muons from the Mouse into the Cats in Rossi's Self Sustain mode (SSM) configuration looks like an application of a muon chain reaction that you speculate about. We will need to watch Rossi to see what type of health problems he develops from his time inside the shipping container. Someone should tell Rossi about the possiblity of muons comming out of his reactor then ask Rossi how he will deal with the muon flux coming out of his reactor On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: *From:* Axil Axil Ø *http://www.i2u2.org/elab/cosmic/posters/display.jsp?name=poster.lead.cool.man.data* http://www.i2u2.org/elab/cosmic/posters/display.jsp?name=poster.lead.cool.man.data Ø The Effects of Lead Shielding on Muon Counts…. If you are near a LENR reactor, tt looks like lots of muons will get to and into the body. I wonder if muons are harmful? Aside from the possible (likely) harm from muons, the curious and disturbing thing about this paper is that the authors: 1) expected to see a decreasing rate of muon counts as more lead above the detectors was added, 2) They were extremely surprised to see that when going from 15cm to 20cm of lead, the count rate of muons actually increased 3) This data point was extremely unexpected. They had expected that the rate of decrease of the muon count rates would have slowed, but the last thing expected was for the count rates to actually increase. That is a lot of lead, first of all. Even then, it never blocked all the muons. For the muon count to increase, with thicker lead, this means that some kind of chain reaction is happening above a thickness level, but muon keep progressing thought the metal. As an analogy – (of how LENR could benefit from this) consider the known parameters of fission … a chain reaction of neutrons is the driver of fission reactors, and thus the concept of a chain reaction of muons is intriguing. Can muons be harvested? As for using this information in a practical manner, the main problem is that tons of lead would be needed for even a small reactor - and in the end – the question is whether they can be converted into energy.
RE: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
Here is another possibility involving the muon. Muon decay (Michel decay) consists of the almost immediate decay into an electron, an electron antineutrino, and a muon neutrino. This happens after only 2 microseconds, which is too short for chain reaction of muons per se, and therefore what we may looking at – for the active propagator of LENR in not the muon but instead … the muon neutrino. We know that the electron antineutrino doesn’t help much in this regard, since it is seen in beta decay and that kind of decay has been tried as an accelerant in LENR -- but the muon neutrino is not as well-known. This particle does not have the short lifetime of the muon, but in the past it was thought to be inert, like the other neutrino varieties. Perhaps this variety of neutrino is, in fact, not as inert as the others in some circumstances, due to some special property. The species was also once thought to be FTL but that claim was presumably retracted … but maybe not completely retracted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_neutrino Anyway, the door is open for the possibility that upon the initial muon decay in certain materials, the muon neutrino can somehow interact (in what looks like a chain reaction) to create either another muon (which happens in lead) or in other circumstances will end up supplying the thermal gain which is seen. Stranger things have happened with neutrinos – which are still a great mystery to science. From: Axil Axil As a way to shield muon radiation, the LENR reactor could be buried underground in a silo with the depth of the hole determined by the health effects produced by the expected muon flux… The flow of Muons from the Mouse into the Cats in Rossi's Self Sustain mode (SSM) configuration looks like an application of a muon chain reaction that you speculate about. * http://www.i2u2.org/elab/cosmic/posters/display.jsp?name=poster.lead.cool.man.data * The Effects of Lead Shielding on Muon Counts…. If you are near a LENR reactor, tt looks like lots of muons will get to and into the body. I wonder if muons are harmful? Aside from the possible (likely) harm from muons, the curious and disturbing thing about this paper is that the authors: 1) expected to see a decreasing rate of muon counts as more lead above the detectors was added, 2) They were extremely surprised to see that when going from 15cm to 20cm of lead, the count rate of muons actually increased 3) This data point was extremely unexpected. They had expected that the rate of decrease of the muon count rates would have slowed, but the last thing expected was for the count rates to actually increase. That is a lot of lead, first of all. Even then, it never blocked all the muons. For the muon count to increase, with thicker lead, this means that some kind of chain reaction is happening above a thickness level, but muon keep progressing thought the metal. As an analogy – (of how LENR could benefit from this) consider the known parameters of fission … a chain reaction of neutrons is the driver of fission reactors, and thus the concept of a chain reaction of muons is intriguing. Can muons be harvested? As for using this information in a practical manner, the main problem is that tons of lead would be needed for even a small reactor - and in the end – the question is whether they can be converted into energy.
Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
Muons have a very low cross section and do not interact with matter much at all. That low reaction cross section is why muons are harmless to health, However, in the Cat and Mouse configuration employed in the Rossi’s SSM mode, something must be increasing that cross section by a huge amount. That increase in the level of the probability of reaction must be due to a quantum mechanical process. My guess the cause is coherence of the Cat. A Bose condinsate might make the Cat look like an atom that is many centimeters in size. The muon from the mouse can’t help but react with an atom that is that big. The same must be true of neutrinos. Coherence and entanglement might make particles that don’t usually interact with atoms always interact with SuperAtoms in a Bose condensate cause by quantum effects. Just the muons and neutrinos that come to earth produced from cosmic rays might trigger nuclear reactions in a Bose condensate. Rydberg matter because of its coherence might be a great receiver for subatomic particles that don;t usually react at all. On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Here is another possibility involving the muon. Muon decay (Michel decay) consists of the almost immediate decay into an electron, an electron antineutrino, and a muon neutrino. This happens after only 2 microseconds, which is too short for chain reaction of muons* per se*, and therefore what we may looking at – for the active propagator of LENR in not the muon but instead … the muon neutrino. We know that the electron antineutrino doesn’t help much in this regard, since it is seen in beta decay and that kind of decay has been tried as an accelerant in LENR -- but the muon neutrino is not as well-known. This particle does not have the short lifetime of the muon, but in the past it was thought to be inert, like the other neutrino varieties. Perhaps this variety of neutrino is, in fact, not as inert as the others in some circumstances, due to some special property. The species was also once thought to be FTL but that claim was presumably retracted … but maybe not completely retracted. *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_neutrino* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_neutrino Anyway, the door is open for the possibility that upon the initial muon decay in certain materials, the muon neutrino can somehow interact (in what looks like a chain reaction) to create either another muon (which happens in lead) or in other circumstances will end up supplying the thermal gain which is seen. Stranger things have happened with neutrinos – which are still a great mystery to science. *From:* Axil Axil As a way to shield muon radiation, the LENR reactor could be buried underground in a silo with the depth of the hole determined by the health effects produced by the expected muon flux… The flow of Muons from the Mouse into the Cats in Rossi's Self Sustain mode (SSM) configuration looks like an application of a muon chain reaction that you speculate about. Ø *http://www.i2u2.org/elab/cosmic/posters/display.jsp?name=poster.lead.cool.man.data* http://www.i2u2.org/elab/cosmic/posters/display.jsp?name=poster.lead.cool.man.data Ø The Effects of Lead Shielding on Muon Counts…. If you are near a LENR reactor, tt looks like lots of muons will get to and into the body. I wonder if muons are harmful? Aside from the possible (likely) harm from muons, the curious and disturbing thing about this paper is that the authors: 1) expected to see a decreasing rate of muon counts as more lead above the detectors was added, 2) They were extremely surprised to see that when going from 15cm to 20cm of lead, the count rate of muons actually increased 3) This data point was extremely unexpected. They had expected that the rate of decrease of the muon count rates would have slowed, but the last thing expected was for the count rates to actually increase. That is a lot of lead, first of all. Even then, it never blocked all the muons. For the muon count to increase, with thicker lead, this means that some kind of chain reaction is happening above a thickness level, but muon keep progressing thought the metal. As an analogy – (of how LENR could benefit from this) consider the known parameters of fission … a chain reaction of neutrons is the driver of fission reactors, and thus the concept of a chain reaction of muons is intriguing. Can muons be harvested? As for using this information in a practical manner, the main problem is that tons of lead would be needed for even a small reactor - and in the end – the question is whether they can be converted into energy.
Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the EcatWorld blog over many months. The SPP behavior that has not yet been recognized by plasmonic science is the ability of SPPs to produce a positive feedback loop that compensates for the energy losses due to diffusion through the offsetting gains produced by non linear energy production. This ability to amplify the chemistry based catalytic activity of SPPs is not yet in the province of plasmonic research. When nano-particles setup the SPP to amplify their power and force SPP wave forms to loop onto themselves in a vortex, it produces a short lived “Dark Mode” configuration that acts just like a celestial black hole that draws energy into itself from its surroundings. This ability to attract, concentrate and store new energy involves at least two distinct although related mechanisms. First, SPPs concentrate and reorient the spin of photons then project the magnetic single pole beam so formed from one of the poles of the vortex. This beam both destabilizes and then transports energy from the affected matter back along the path of the beam through the action of quantum teleportation. This anapole magnetic beam mechanism can act at a considerable distance away from the vortex. The magnetic beam is energetic enough to produce mesons from condensation from the vacuum which the decays into muons which act to produce muon canalize fusion. Next, the SPP soliton can share, transfer and accumulate energy through quantum mechanical entanglement with clusters of matter of arbitrary size. This instantaneous gleaning of energy from many distinct sources occurs within a spherical zone around the vortex.This duality of causation in the results observed in the LENR reaction leads to understandable confusion. But this multiplicity in the results as produced by the fundamental cause of LENR are unified by a commonality of characteristics linked to a common origin of the effect.. These common and universal conditions include the thermalization of gamma radiation, the rapid to instantaneous stabilization of radioactive isotopes, lack of neutron emissions, and the wide variation of seemingly random transmutation results which includes fusion of light elements into heavier elements and fission of heavy elements into lighter ones, remote reaction at a distance from the location of the LENR reaction, and instantaneous cluster fusion involving huge numbers of sub-reactions that occur instantly and collectively. Even though the LENR reaction oftentimes occurs concurrent with the presence of hydrogen isotopes, hydrogen in not required as a fundamental cause of the reaction as shown in the experiments done at Proton 21 where a ball of copper is blasted with a high powered arc discharge, and the carbon dust experiments performed using microwaves conducted by George Egely, the new editor of infinite magazine. In the Proton 21 experiments in nano-particles involved are copper based and in the Egely case the nano-particles are based on carbon. In the Papp reaction. The nano particles are based on chlorine and noble gases. LENR has made itself known in our world ever since the days of young Tesla when electricity has be made powerful enough to generate nano particles from matter. Since we have brought Egely’s name up, Egely has written a wonderful series of articles explaining how SPPs have produced LENR for over a century in many diverse and now long forgotten systems going back to the times and work by Tesla. They are well worth a read and as follows: http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part1.pdf http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part2.pdf http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part3.pdf
Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as explained in the SPP theory. In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the EcatWorld blog over many months. The SPP behavior that has not yet been recognized by plasmonic science is the ability of SPPs to produce a positive feedback loop that compensates for the energy losses due to diffusion through the offsetting gains produced by non linear energy production. This ability to amplify the chemistry based catalytic activity of SPPs is not yet in the province of plasmonic research. When nano-particles setup the SPP to amplify their power and force SPP wave forms to loop onto themselves in a vortex, it produces a short lived “Dark Mode” configuration that acts just like a celestial black hole that draws energy into itself from its surroundings. This ability to attract, concentrate and store new energy involves at least two distinct although related mechanisms. First, SPPs concentrate and reorient the spin of photons then project the magnetic single pole beam so formed from one of the poles of the vortex. This beam both destabilizes and then transports energy from the affected matter back along the path of the beam through the action of quantum teleportation. This anapole magnetic beam mechanism can act at a considerable distance away from the vortex. The magnetic beam is energetic enough to produce mesons from condensation from the vacuum which the decays into muons which act to produce muon canalize fusion. Next, the SPP soliton can share, transfer and accumulate energy through quantum mechanical entanglement with clusters of matter of arbitrary size. This instantaneous gleaning of energy from many distinct sources occurs within a spherical zone around the vortex.This duality of causation in the results observed in the LENR reaction leads to understandable confusion. But this multiplicity in the results as produced by the fundamental cause of LENR are unified by a commonality of characteristics linked to a common origin of the effect.. These common and universal conditions include the thermalization of gamma radiation, the rapid to instantaneous stabilization of radioactive isotopes, lack of neutron emissions, and the wide variation of seemingly random transmutation results which includes fusion of light elements into heavier elements and fission of heavy elements into lighter ones, remote reaction at a distance from the location of the LENR reaction, and instantaneous cluster fusion involving huge numbers of sub-reactions that occur instantly and collectively. Even though the LENR reaction oftentimes occurs concurrent with the presence of hydrogen isotopes, hydrogen in not required as a fundamental cause of the reaction as shown in the experiments done at Proton 21 where a ball of copper is blasted with a high powered arc discharge, and the carbon dust experiments performed using microwaves conducted by George Egely, the new editor of infinite magazine. In the Proton 21 experiments in nano-particles involved are copper based and in the Egely case the nano-particles are based on carbon. In the Papp reaction. The nano particles are based on chlorine and noble gases. LENR has made itself known in our world ever since the days of young Tesla when electricity has be made powerful enough to generate nano particles from matter. Since we have brought Egely’s name up, Egely has written a wonderful series of articles explaining how SPPs have produced LENR for over a century in many diverse and now long forgotten systems going back to the times and work by Tesla. They are well worth a read and as follows:
Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
As explained here before on this site, nuclear energy from fusion is carried to the SPP soliton via worm holes via teleportation and transformed into increased photonic energy and associated increases in an anapole magnetic field that produces muons through the Schwinger effect. http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as explained in the SPP theory. In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the EcatWorld blog over many months. The SPP behavior that has not yet been recognized by plasmonic science is the ability of SPPs to produce a positive feedback loop that compensates for the energy losses due to diffusion through the offsetting gains produced by non linear energy production. This ability to amplify the chemistry based catalytic activity of SPPs is not yet in the province of plasmonic research. When nano-particles setup the SPP to amplify their power and force SPP wave forms to loop onto themselves in a vortex, it produces a short lived “Dark Mode” configuration that acts just like a celestial black hole that draws energy into itself from its surroundings. This ability to attract, concentrate and store new energy involves at least two distinct although related mechanisms. First, SPPs concentrate and reorient the spin of photons then project the magnetic single pole beam so formed from one of the poles of the vortex. This beam both destabilizes and then transports energy from the affected matter back along the path of the beam through the action of quantum teleportation. This anapole magnetic beam mechanism can act at a considerable distance away from the vortex. The magnetic beam is energetic enough to produce mesons from condensation from the vacuum which the decays into muons which act to produce muon canalize fusion. Next, the SPP soliton can share, transfer and accumulate energy through quantum mechanical entanglement with clusters of matter of arbitrary size. This instantaneous gleaning of energy from many distinct sources occurs within a spherical zone around the vortex.This duality of causation in the results observed in the LENR reaction leads to understandable confusion. But this multiplicity in the results as produced by the fundamental cause of LENR are unified by a commonality of characteristics linked to a common origin of the effect.. These common and universal conditions include the thermalization of gamma radiation, the rapid to instantaneous stabilization of radioactive isotopes, lack of neutron emissions, and the wide variation of seemingly random transmutation results which includes fusion of light elements into heavier elements and fission of heavy elements into lighter ones, remote reaction at a distance from the location of the LENR reaction, and instantaneous cluster fusion involving huge numbers of sub-reactions that occur instantly and collectively. Even though the LENR reaction oftentimes occurs concurrent with the presence of hydrogen isotopes, hydrogen in not required as a fundamental cause of the reaction as shown in the experiments done at Proton 21 where a ball of copper is blasted with a high powered arc discharge, and the carbon dust experiments performed using microwaves conducted by George Egely, the new editor of infinite magazine. In the Proton 21 experiments in nano-particles involved are copper based and in the Egely case the nano-particles are based on carbon. In the Papp reaction. The nano particles are based on chlorine and noble gases. LENR has made itself known in our world ever since the
Re: [Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
Posts combined revised and extended as follows: The appearance of muons in the LENR reaction are explained by SPP theory. Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the E-cat World blog over many months. With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate 6 MeV enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as explained in the SPP theory. In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). As explained here before on this site, nuclear energy from fusion is carried to the SPP soliton via worm holes via teleportation and transformed into increased photonic energy and associated increases in an anapole magnetic field that produces muons through the Schwinger effect. http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html The positive feedback loop between fusion reactions and production of magnetic fields and entanglement results is a transfer of that energy derived from fusion into the production of mesons, muons, pions and other subatomic particles. One result of this conversion of fusion based nuclear energy is the production of electrons from the decay of muons. We have suspected this electron production mechanism as informed from comments Rossi has made about his observation of electrical power production from the E-Cat. The Cat/Mouse interface may be using muons produced by the Mouse to activate the LENR reactions in the Cats when the Cats surround the Mouse to capture most of the Muon flux. On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: As explained here before on this site, nuclear energy from fusion is carried to the SPP soliton via worm holes via teleportation and transformed into increased photonic energy and associated increases in an anapole magnetic field that produces muons through the Schwinger effect. http://www.phys.uconn.edu/~dunne/dunne_schwinger.html On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Leif Holmlid states that the production of Muons in the nuclear reactions catalyzed by the fundamental cause of LENR are not caused by the fusion of deuterium. The fundamental LENR cause resides inside the Rydberg matter as explained in the SPP theory. In this discussion, it is excluded that the muons are formed from the fusion energy, but it is clear that they are formed from nuclear and decay processes starting in the D(0). On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: With the detection of muons in fusion processes related to Rydberg matter reported by Leif Holmlid, I wonder if the tracks reported in the cloud chamber experiments of Dr. Piantelli were actually tracks produced by muons of the appropriate enemy levels rather than tracks produced by protons? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the EcatWorld blog over many months. The SPP behavior that has not yet been recognized by plasmonic science is the ability of SPPs to produce a positive feedback loop that compensates for the energy losses due to diffusion through the offsetting gains produced by non linear energy production. This ability to amplify
[Vo]:The appearance of muons are explained by SPP theory.
Regarding: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/86/8/10.1063/1.4928109 Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements The detection of muons produced by Rydberg hydrogen matter supports the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) theory of LENR. This theory specifically described how muons are produced and how these muons result in the production of fusion among the full range of atomic elements. This theory has been recorded in posts written by AxilAxil in the Vortex L, EGO OUT blog, and the EcatWorld blog over many months. The SPP behavior that has not yet been recognized by plasmonic science is the ability of SPPs to produce a positive feedback loop that compensates for the energy losses due to diffusion through the offsetting gains produced by non linear energy production. This ability to amplify the chemistry based catalytic activity of SPPs is not yet in the province of plasmonic research. When nano-particles setup the SPP to amplify their power and force SPP wave forms to loop onto themselves in a vortex, it produces a short lived “Dark Mode” configuration that acts just like a celestial black hole that draws energy into itself from its surroundings. This ability to attract, concentrate and store new energy involves at least two distinct although related mechanisms. First, SPPs concentrate and reorient the spin of photons then project the magnetic single pole beam so formed from one of the poles of the vortex. This beam both destabilizes and then transports energy from the affected matter back along the path of the beam through the action of quantum teleportation. This anapole magnetic beam mechanism can act at a considerable distance away from the vortex. The magnetic beam is energetic enough to produce mesons from condensation from the vacuum which the decays into muons which act to produce muon canalize fusion. Next, the SPP soliton can share, transfer and accumulate energy through quantum mechanical entanglement with clusters of matter of arbitrary size. This instantaneous gleaning of energy from many distinct sources occurs within a spherical zone around the vortex.This duality of causation in the results observed in the LENR reaction leads to understandable confusion. But this multiplicity in the results as produced by the fundamental cause of LENR are unified by a commonality of characteristics linked to a common origin of the effect.. These common and universal conditions include the thermalization of gamma radiation, the rapid to instantaneous stabilization of radioactive isotopes, lack of neutron emissions, and the wide variation of seemingly random transmutation results which includes fusion of light elements into heavier elements and fission of heavy elements into lighter ones, remote reaction at a distance from the location of the LENR reaction, and instantaneous cluster fusion involving huge numbers of sub-reactions that occur instantly and collectively. Even though the LENR reaction oftentimes occurs concurrent with the presence of hydrogen isotopes, hydrogen in not required as a fundamental cause of the reaction as shown in the experiments done at Proton 21 where a ball of copper is blasted with a high powered arc discharge, and the carbon dust experiments performed using microwaves conducted by George Egely, the new editor of infinite magazine. In the Proton 21 experiments in nano-particles involved are copper based and in the Egely case the nano-particles are based on carbon. In the Papp reaction. The nano particles are based on chlorine and noble gases. LENR has made itself known in our world ever since the days of young Tesla when electricity has be made powerful enough to generate nano particles from matter. Since we have brought Egely’s name up, Egely has written a wonderful series of articles explaining how SPPs have produced LENR for over a century in many diverse and now long forgotten systems going back to the times and work by Tesla. They are well worth a read and as follows: http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part1.pdf http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part2.pdf http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part3.pdf
