RE: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

2010-01-04 Thread Rick Monteverde
Horace -

 

The object was low in the SSW about an hour after sunset. Still working on
finding out the viewing angle and umbra position, but the max sight angle
was around 22 degrees. Came up vertically from the horizon out of the SSW,
turned towards the west and moved parallel to the horizon for a while, then
back down towards the SW as it darkened and winked out. I'm assuming there
that the loss of light was due to a change of attitude of the object's
reflective surface since it appeared at the end to have been moving towards
more sunlight.

 

I looked up ISS orbits and watched it make a good overhead pass the other
night at about 20 minutes later than the UFO sighting for a comparable view.
Apparent speed through the sky was around the same or a bit faster, and the
pale yellow color changed to the orange, then reddish orange color as the
ISS approached the umbra and went out, at the end it was similar in color to
the UFO. The UFO was much brighter though, and had the reddish orange color
through most of its flight, as opposed to the ISS showing that color only
for the last couple of seconds of its path. The UFO seemed a little more
yellow right at first as it was rising up in the sky and was at its
brightest.  Up would be coming from the SSW, away from the sunset and
towards shadow. The sunset that day was more colorful too, so it may have
contributed to the orange color over a wider altitude range. I would say
that after a fresh look at the ISS, the UFO was probably a rather large
object. It was substantially brighter than I've ever seen the ISS, and the
ISS, now completed and in full sail, is pretty spectacular.

 

R.

 

From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net] 
Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 10:32 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

 

I wrote:  If the object was ever in a direction approximately due north or
south of you, i.e. on a line perpendicular to the sunset location, then the
altitude h I provided fairly closely applies to the object for that time t
in the table.   If it was mainly east or west then another calculation is
needed.  I would say anything above 100,000 feet, or 18.9 miles,  was
probably not a military jet, and certainly not a passenger jet.   That
altitude h corresponds to about 22 minutes after surface darkness - to
whatever degree such darkness needs to be defined.  From experience there,
I know it gets dark pretty fast in Hawaii after sunset - especially compared
to here - where sunsets can take a very long time. 8^)  If you observed the
object an hour after sunset then I'd say it was well past the 22 minutes
after darkness mark.   A general compass direction thus may be sufficient
information for a definitive answer.  That far after sunset, an hour, taken
even alone, is a pretty strong indication it was not an airplane. 

 

I overlooked the fact that if the object were to the east of you then the
umbra plane would be even higher.  It is only when the object was to the
west of you that there can be any doubt at all.

 

Best regards,

 

Horace Heffner

http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/

 





 



Re: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

2010-01-02 Thread Horace Heffner
I wrote:  If the object was ever in a direction approximately due  
north or south of you, i.e. on a line perpendicular to the sunset  
location, then the altitude h I provided fairly closely applies to  
the object for that time t in the table.   If it was mainly east or  
west then another calculation is needed.  I would say anything above  
100,000 feet, or 18.9 miles,  was probably not a military jet, and  
certainly not a passenger jet.   That altitude h corresponds to about  
22 minutes after surface darkness - to whatever degree such darkness  
needs to be defined.  From experience there,  I know it gets dark  
pretty fast in Hawaii after sunset - especially compared to here -  
where sunsets can take a very long time. 8^)  If you observed the  
object an hour after sunset then I'd say it was well past the 22  
minutes after darkness mark.   A general compass direction thus may  
be sufficient information for a definitive answer.  That far after  
sunset, an hour, taken even alone, is a pretty strong indication it  
was not an airplane. 


I overlooked the fact that if the object were to the east of you then  
the umbra plane would be even higher.  It is only when the object was  
to the west of you that there can be any doubt at all.


Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/






Re: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

2010-01-02 Thread Horace Heffner

A Falcon project remnant?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ 
Force_Application_and_Launch_from_Continental_United_States#FALCON


http://tinyurl.com/ydsfv7r

Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/






RE: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

2009-12-30 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
From: Terry Blanton
 
 Sounds like a Fastwalker.

Aurora?

Regards

Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks 



Re: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

2009-12-30 Thread Terry Blanton
http://www.fastwalkers.com/

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:59 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
 From: Terry Blanton

 Sounds like a Fastwalker.

 Aurora?

 Regards

 Steven Vincent Johnson
 www.OrionWorks.com
 www.zazzle.com/orionworks





RE: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

2009-12-30 Thread Rick Monteverde
We don't get many sightings out here, we're a distinct dull spot on the UFO
observation map. This is the my first sighting spanning 40 years here of
something having a real chance of being anomalous. By coincidence we have
the chief of state vacationing here, and some of the more conventional rings
of security are easily seen. The ships offshore, military flights in
patterns not usually flown, etc. I've read of accounts and seen the videos
of anomalous things lurking on the periphery of military operations, but
it's highly speculative that it might have had anything to do with the
sighting. I still have to run the numbers, and I wanted to get outside to
re-check and identify the stars near its path, but it was overcast last
night. I did find some useful astronomy websites, found out that the upper
limb of the sun (including that atmospheric distortion margin) was 13.84
degrees below the horizon at the time, a bit after official marine twilight
(pretty dark). 

R.

-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 6:00 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

From: Terry Blanton
 
 Sounds like a Fastwalker.

Aurora?

Regards

Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks 



Re: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

2009-12-30 Thread Terry Blanton
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Rick Monteverde r...@highsurf.com wrote:
 We don't get many sightings out here, we're a distinct dull spot on the UFO
 observation map.

Someone searching for Obama's birth certificate?

Terry



Re: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

2009-12-29 Thread Horace Heffner
In case there is any doubt, the following is my final answer - unless  
of course I find other mistakes!  8^)



On Dec 29, 2009, at 8:44 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:



Hi Rick,

Coincidentally, I saw something similar yesterday  (Dec 28, 2009)  
around noon AKST, (about 11 orbits later) west of Palmer AK, but  
heading SW.  It was one small finger width at arms length above the  
horizon.  It had a periodic (about 10 second) flash to it, so I  
assumed it might be a  booster, but strange it was heading SW, not  
SE or NE, or just S.  Of course a U-turn is not a typical satellite  
maneuver, nor did I see that!


The altitude h to the directly overhead sun midline is given by:

   h = r_earth * ( SQRT(1 + sin^2 theta) -1)

Given time after sunset t we have:

   theta = (t/(8.64x10^4 s))*(2*Pi) radians = (t/(1440 min))*(2*Pi)  
radians


Earth radius, r_earth, at Hawaii is about 3951 mi.  Here are some  
numbers:


t (min) theta (radians) h (miles)

1   0.00436331944   0.03760073165
5   0.02181659722   0.93976780755
10  0.04363319444   3.75594358
20  0.08726638889   14.973936498
30  0.13089958333   33.506081478
60  0.26179916667   130.1553394
90  0.39269875  279.3533269


Since the above is time after total sunset, you don't have to  
correct for the angular width of the sun.  However, even total  
sunset is not good enough to black out an object though, due to  
light diffraction.   Clearly not enough time, i.e. shortly after  
sunset, passed to rule out an airplane.


Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/






RE: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

2009-12-29 Thread Rick Monteverde
Horace -

 

My sighting wasn't just after sunset, it was just after nightfall -  total
darkness. There was just a vague hint of fading light on the horizon, but
the sky surrounding the object, which was relatively low in the southwest,
was already black. 

 

I did find something on the after-sunset atmospheric distortion - they say
add 6 arc minutes to the apparent semidiameter of the sun. I'll try to
muddle through your figures in a little while. I sure appreciate the help,
thanks.

 

-  R.

 

From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 8:08 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

 

In case there is any doubt, the following is my final answer - unless of
course I find other mistakes!  8^)

 

 

On Dec 29, 2009, at 8:44 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:

 

 

Hi Rick,

 

Coincidentally, I saw something similar yesterday  (Dec 28, 2009) around
noon AKST, (about 11 orbits later) west of Palmer AK, but heading SW.  It
was one small finger width at arms length above the horizon.  It had a
periodic (about 10 second) flash to it, so I assumed it might be a  booster,
but strange it was heading SW, not SE or NE, or just S.  Of course a U-turn
is not a typical satellite maneuver, nor did I see that! 

 

The altitude h to the directly overhead sun midline is given by:

 

   h = r_earth * ( SQRT(1 + sin^2 theta) -1)

 

Given time after sunset t we have:

 

   theta = (t/(8.64x10^4 s))*(2*Pi) radians = (t/(1440 min))*(2*Pi) radians

 

Earth radius, r_earth, at Hawaii is about 3951 mi.  Here are some numbers:

 

t (min) theta (radians)   h (miles)



1 0.00436331944 0.03760073165

5 0.02181659722 0.93976780755

100.04363319444 3.75594358

200.08726638889 14.973936498

300.13089958333 33.506081478

600.26179916667 130.1553394

900.39269875  279.3533269

 

 

Since the above is time after total sunset, you don't have to correct for
the angular width of the sun.  However, even total sunset is not good enough
to black out an object though, due to light diffraction.   Clearly not
enough time, i.e. shortly after sunset, passed to rule out an airplane. 

 

Best regards,

 

Horace Heffner

http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/

 





 



RE: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

2009-12-29 Thread Rick Monteverde
Sunset at my location in Honolulu that day was 5:59 PM, sighting was at 6:58
PM.  I'll look for a star chart to get the sighting angle for the object.

 

-  R.



Re: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

2009-12-29 Thread Horace Heffner


On Dec 29, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Rick Monteverde wrote:


Horace –

My sighting wasn’t just after sunset, it was just after nightfall  
-  total darkness. There was just a vague hint of fading light on  
the horizon, but the sky surrounding the object, which was  
relatively low in the southwest, was already black.


I did find something on the after-sunset atmospheric distortion –  
they say add 6 arc minutes to the apparent semidiameter of the sun.  
I’ll try to muddle through your figures in a little while. I sure  
appreciate the help, thanks.


Yes, that accounts for distortion of the image.  There is also  
atmospheric scatter involved, and that might make an object look  
orange or red.   It makes snowy mountains here take on hot pastel  
colors - called Alpenglow.


This time of year the sun sets almost due west there.  If the object  
was ever in a direction approximately due north or south of you, i.e.  
on a line perpendicular to the sunset location, then the altitude h I  
provided fairly closely applies to the object for that time t in the  
table.   If it was mainly east or west then another calculation is  
needed.  I would say anything above 100,000 feet, or 18.9 miles,  was  
probably not a military jet, and certainly not a passenger jet.
That altitude h corresponds to about 22 minutes after surface  
darkness - to whatever degree such darkness needs to be defined.   
From experience there,  I know it gets dark pretty fast in Hawaii  
after sunset - especially compared to here - where sunsets can take a  
very long time. 8^)  If you observed the object an hour after sunset  
then I'd say it was well past the 22 minutes after darkness mark.   A  
general compass direction thus may be sufficient information for a  
definitive answer.  That far after sunset, an hour, taken even alone,  
is a pretty strong indication it was not an airplane.


Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/






Re: [Vo]:Personal:Little help with UFO sighting?

2009-12-29 Thread Terry Blanton
Sounds like a Fastwalker.

Terry

On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:

 On Dec 29, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Rick Monteverde wrote:

 Horace –

 My sighting wasn’t just after sunset, it was just after nightfall -  total
 darkness. There was just a vague hint of fading light on the horizon, but
 the sky surrounding the object, which was relatively low in the southwest,
 was already black.

 I did find something on the after-sunset atmospheric distortion – they say
 add 6 arc minutes to the apparent semidiameter of the sun. I’ll try to
 muddle through your figures in a little while. I sure appreciate the help,
 thanks.

 Yes, that accounts for distortion of the image.  There is also atmospheric
 scatter involved, and that might make an object look orange or red.   It
 makes snowy mountains here take on hot pastel colors - called Alpenglow.
 This time of year the sun sets almost due west there.  If the object was
 ever in a direction approximately due north or south of you, i.e. on a line
 perpendicular to the sunset location, then the altitude h I provided fairly
 closely applies to the object for that time t in the table.   If it was
 mainly east or west then another calculation is needed.  I would say
 anything above 100,000 feet, or 18.9 miles,  was probably not a military
 jet, and certainly not a passenger jet.   That altitude h corresponds to
 about 22 minutes after surface darkness - to whatever degree such darkness
 needs to be defined.  From experience there,  I know it gets dark pretty
 fast in Hawaii after sunset - especially compared to here - where sunsets
 can take a very long time. 8^)  If you observed the object an hour after
 sunset then I'd say it was well past the 22 minutes after darkness mark.   A
 general compass direction thus may be sufficient information for a
 definitive answer.  That far after sunset, an hour, taken even alone, is a
 pretty strong indication it was not an airplane.
 Best regards,

 Horace Heffner
 http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/