[vpp-dev] vppctl doesn't report returned pings from rdma int
I noticed on a couple of servers that I have interconnected in packet.net that when using vppctl ping command, the rdma interface the ping command doesn't report returned packets. ping says 0 received, but the received packets show up in counts in show int though. --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13118): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13118 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31723900/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] rdma driver
On 05/13/2019 01:22 PM, Damjan Marion wrote:
On 13 May 2019, at 19:15, Billy <mailto:bmcf...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:18 AM Benoit Ganne (bganne) via
Lists.Fd.Io <http://lists.fd.io/> <mailto:cisco@lists.fd.io>> wrote:
Hi Thomas,
> The external rdma driver includes parts of ib-verbs which are
provided as
> part of the fedora 30 such as /usr/include/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h.
> This prevents installation of vpp on Fedora 30 and upgraded
Fedora 29.
I think I am trying to understand a similar issue with CentOS
packaging.
Just to make sure I understand correctly: what you see is
vpp-deps RPM conflicting on installation with kernel-headers RPM
because it is trying to install
/usr/include/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h, which is already provided by
kernel-headers. Correct?
I don't think this is a problem in the rdma ext driver.
I think that stuff that used to be in rdma-devel rpm is now in
kernel-headers as of Fed30. Let me research further.
I think Fedora 30 has moved some headers that used to be in the
rdma rpm into the kernel-devel package as the Mellanox drivers
have been mainstreamed. I suspect that this same problem will
appear with CentOS 8.
Yes, that is correct.
$ sudo rpm -i build-root/*.rpm
file /usr/include/rdma from install of
vpp-devel-19.08-rc0~196_g7fe470a54.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package kernel-headers-5.0.9-200.fc29.x86_64
file /usr/include/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h from install of
vpp-devel-19.08-rc0~196_g7fe470a54.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package kernel-headers-5.0.9-200.fc29.x86_64
If so, I am a little puzzled because packagecloud RPMs for CentOS
do not include /usr/include/rdma/* files, and the same is true
when I build those package myself.
Fedora packages are different (and newer) than CentOS. So the
difference is not unusual.
Could you document the steps to reproduce the issue in VPP jira:
https://jira.fd.io/projects/VPP/
https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1674
Right solution to this problem will be that VPP RPM packaging stops
blindly packaging all *.h files into vpp-devel package and it starts
using CMake components instead.
This particular section in extras/rpm/vpp.spec:
for dir in $(find %{_mu_build_dir}/%{_vpp_install_dir}/*/include/
-maxdepth 0 -type d -print | grep -v dpdk)
do
for subdir in $(cd ${dir} && find . -type d -print)
do
mkdir -p -m755 %{buildroot}/usr/include/${subdir}
done
for file in $(cd ${dir} && find . -type f -print)
do
install -p -m 644 $dir/$file
%{buildroot}%{_includedir}/$file
done
done
I agree on this point. This is legacy code in the spec file that scrapes
up all the header files is not the best way of doing things.
Ideally, the RPM packaging the RPM packaging from the cmake files to
build separate packages for exts and plugins each with its own devel rpm.
I think the solution to Ben's problem is above though.
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
NFV and Fast Data Planes
Networking Group Office of the CTO
*Red Hat*
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13010): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13010
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31607407/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[vpp-dev] rdma driver
Benoit, The external rdma driver includes parts of ib-verbs which are provided as part of the fedora 30 such as . /usr/include/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h. This prevents installation of vpp on Fedora 30 and upgraded Fedora 29. --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13004): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13004 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31607407/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] RPM package question related to https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18953/
Jerome, python3 is an implicit dependency of vpp-devel and I am not sure why. Because of that I put python36 explicitly in Requires because I was concerned about cross versions of Python between 34 and 36 having side affects. As for epel-release, it is harmless but is not strictly required installation time but I wanted to make sure the epel repo was installed so further dependency checks were resolved from the correct repo. --Tom On 05/10/2019 10:20 AM, Thomas F Herbert wrote: Jerome, Let me take a look at this today. I will submit a patch to take them out if I can verify that they are not needed. --Tom On 05/10/2019 05:11 AM, Jerome Tollet (jtollet) wrote: Hi Thomas, In https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18953/ you are putting epel-release and Python3 into the dependencies. 1. I can understand that those are needed as /BuildRequires:/, but are they really needed for /Requires: /? 2. Why do we need epel-release as runtime requirement? 3. Do we really need Python3 for VPP 19.04 itself? Jerome -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12980): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12980 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31575010/675058 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [therb...@redhat.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12995): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12995 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31575010/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] Question about rdma drivers in vpp 19.04
On 05/10/2019 12:46 PM, Benoit Ganne (bganne) wrote: I verified it on CentOS 7.6 and it works fine: Here i s my gist for Robert and Fred with the steps I used. https://gist.github.com/tfherbert/64cef832f03935c6a2a58729718a36ff Glad to hear, thanks a lot. In CentOS 7.6, for RDMA drivers to work, we need to install rdma rpm as I did in my 19.02 patch to get the library and the libibverbs.so library. This is documented in my patch to 19.02, https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18521/ Good point. We embed libibverb statically in the rdma plugin though, so the only remaining runtime dependency should be the kernel driver. Is this provided by rdma-core in RHEL? If so, as this is only needed by the rdma plugin, we could add rdma-core as a dependency of vpp-plugins. Regarding the startup dependency in system unit file, I am not familiar with system but can we add a "soft" dependency? Such as "must be started after rdma-load-modules@rdma.service if present"? Yes. Actually, as I think about it, I don't remember whether my test sequence verified that that had to be done. However, we know that the modules are loaded, they will persist. ben -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12992): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12992 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31570536/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] Question about rdma drivers in vpp 19.04
On 05/10/2019 12:46 PM, Benoit Ganne (bganne) wrote: I verified it on CentOS 7.6 and it works fine: Here i s my gist for Robert and Fred with the steps I used. https://gist.github.com/tfherbert/64cef832f03935c6a2a58729718a36ff Glad to hear, thanks a lot. In CentOS 7.6, for RDMA drivers to work, we need to install rdma rpm as I did in my 19.02 patch to get the library and the libibverbs.so library. This is documented in my patch to 19.02, https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18521/ Good point. We embed libibverb statically in the rdma plugin though, so the only remaining runtime dependency should be the kernel driver. Is this provided by rdma-core in RHEL? If so, as this is only needed by the rdma plugin, we could add rdma-core as a dependency of vpp-plugins. Regarding the startup dependency in system unit file, I am not familiar with system but can we add a "soft" dependency? Such as "must be started after rdma-load-modules@rdma.service if present"? Yes. I believe that just installing the RPMs will cause the kmod to get loaded. Although harmless, that step may be harmless but unnecessary. ben -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12990): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12990 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31570536/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] Question about rdma drivers in vpp 19.04
Ben,
I verified it on CentOS 7.6 and it works fine: Here i s my gist for
Robert and Fred with the steps I used.
https://gist.github.com/tfherbert/64cef832f03935c6a2a58729718a36ff
In CentOS 7.6, for RDMA drivers to work, we need to install rdma rpm as
I did in my 19.02 patch to get the library and the libibverbs.so library.
This is documented in my patch to 19.02,
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18521/
--Tom
On 05/10/2019 12:06 PM, Benoit Ganne (bganne) wrote:
Hi Robert,
That could be an issue with /dev/infiniband/* access rights.
Could you share the output of:
~# echo "create int rdma host-if enp94s0f1 name mlx5" > rdma.vpp
~# sudo timeout 10 strace /usr/bin/vpp "unix { nodaemon exec $PWD/rdma.vpp } plugins
{ plugin dpdk_plugin.so { disable } }"
~# dmesg
Thanks!
ben
-Original Message-
From: Robert Starmer
Sent: vendredi 10 mai 2019 17:29
To: Thomas F Herbert
Cc: Benoit Ganne (bganne) ; vpp-dev ; Damjan Marion (damarion) ; Dave
Barach (dbarach) ; Fred Sharp
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Question about rdma drivers in vpp 19.04
I just retried on a Packet.net m2.xlarge.x86 instance running Ubuntu 18.04
and I get:
vpp# create int rdma host-if enp94s0f1 name mlx5
create interface rdma: Device Open Failed: Bad file descriptor
On packet. I've removed the enp94s0f1 interface from the default bonded
config, and the interface is in a Down state:
3: enp94s0f1: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group
default qlen 1000
link/ether 98:03:9b:30:1e:f7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
The devices are ConnectX-4:
lspci | grep -i mell
5e:00.0 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27710 Family
[ConnectX-4 Lx]
5e:00.1 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27710 Family
[ConnectX-4 Lx]
Robert
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 7:46 AM Thomas F Herbert mailto:therb...@redhat.com> > wrote:
Ben,
I had this working with 19.02 with my patch using dpdk driver with
rdma.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18521/
Which I used in the rpms for CentOS.
The challenge I had was that convincing dpdk to "see" the pci,
That was because the server boots with the mlx ints in a bond and
after removing the if from the bond,
I had to explicitly whitelist it in vpp.conf.
I don't know how to with the new ext rdma driver in 19.04 because it
doesn't make sense to white list it for dpdk.
On 05/10/2019 04:08 AM, Benoit Ganne (bganne) wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I just pushed a small doc:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/19364/3/src/plugins/rdma/rdma_doc.md
I also tried:
vpp# create interface rdma name mlx5
create interface rdma: invalid interface (only mlx5
supported for now)
You are missing the 'host-if ' stanza, eg:
vpp# create int rdma host-if enp94s0f0 name mlx5
Here enp94s0f0 is the netdev of the mhysical port you want to
use.
Here are my commands for 19.04
https://gist.github.com/tfherbert/624d8465c42b0aafb4859f144ba8a4e4
Let me know if you need more info.
ben
--
Thomas F Herbert
NFV and Fast Data Planes
Networking Group Office of the CTO
Red Hat
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
NFV and Fast Data Planes
Networking Group Office of the CTO
*Red Hat*
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12987): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12987
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31570536/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] VPP & Mellanox
On 05/10/2019 10:53 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Fri, 10 May 2019 12:49:51 + "Benoit Ganne (bganne) via Lists.Fd.Io" wrote: I guess you are relying on DPDK here. Are you able to use the card with DPDK testpmd? If not, you may be missing Mellanox OFED driver, depending upon DPDK version. Otherwise you can switch to VPP 19.04 and use the new native driver: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/19364/3/src/plugins/rdma/rdma_doc.md Best ben Current versions of Mellanox DPDK do not require OFED. With a recent DPDK > 18.05 and recent kernel all you need is the rdma core library. +1 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12982): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12982 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31576338/675058 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [therb...@redhat.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12983): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12983 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31576338/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] Question about rdma drivers in vpp 19.04
Ben, I had this working with 19.02 with my patch using dpdk driver with rdma. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18521/ Which I used in the rpms for CentOS. The challenge I had was that convincing dpdk to "see" the pci, That was because the server boots with the mlx ints in a bond and after removing the if from the bond, I had to explicitly whitelist it in vpp.conf. I don't know how to with the new ext rdma driver in 19.04 because it doesn't make sense to white list it for dpdk. On 05/10/2019 04:08 AM, Benoit Ganne (bganne) wrote: Hi Thomas, I just pushed a small doc: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/19364/3/src/plugins/rdma/rdma_doc.md I also tried: vpp# create interface rdma name mlx5 create interface rdma: invalid interface (only mlx5 supported for now) You are missing the 'host-if ' stanza, eg: vpp# create int rdma host-if enp94s0f0 name mlx5 Here enp94s0f0 is the netdev of the mhysical port you want to use. Here are my commands for 19.04 https://gist.github.com/tfherbert/624d8465c42b0aafb4859f144ba8a4e4 Let me know if you need more info. ben -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12981): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12981 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31570536/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] RPM package question related to https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18953/
Jerome, Let me take a look at this today. I will submit a patch to take them out if I can verify that they are not needed. --Tom On 05/10/2019 05:11 AM, Jerome Tollet (jtollet) wrote: Hi Thomas, In https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18953/ you are putting epel-release and Python3 into the dependencies. 1. I can understand that those are needed as /BuildRequires:/, but are they really needed for /Requires: /? 2. Why do we need epel-release as runtime requirement? 3. Do we really need Python3 for VPP 19.04 itself? Jerome -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12980): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12980 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31575010/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[vpp-dev] Question about rdma drivers in vpp 19.04
Question about how to enable rdma driver and mlx4/5 interfaces I just loaded 19.04 on cncf infrastructure machine in packet.net with mlx 4 ints. I don't see the mlx interfaces in show int from vppctl. I am not sure how to find them. They ifs DO show up in show pci. I also tried: vpp# create interface rdma name mlx5 create interface rdma: invalid interface (only mlx5 supported for now) I had this working in 19.02 using dpdk mlx5 drivers and rdma rpm. Thanks, --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12973): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12973 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31570536/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] centos ninja failures
ify-master-ubuntu1604/19027/ : SUCCESS Logs: https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-verify-master- ubuntu1604/19027 https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-clang/6731/ : SUCCESS Logs: https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-verify-master- clang/6731 https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-docs-verify-master/15343/ : SUCCESS Logs: https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-docs-verify-ma ster/15343 https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-centos7/18764/ : NOT_BUILT Logs: https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-verify-master- centos7/18764 7:11 PM fd.io JJB Patch Set 9: Verified+1 Build Successful https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-centos7/18764/ : SUCCESS Logs: https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-verify-master- centos7/18764 7:15 PM Thanks, Klement -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12956): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12956 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31543758/675058 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [therb...@redhat.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12957): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12957 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31543758/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[vpp-dev] python2 requirements
Damjan, Renato, I am working on cleaning up Fedora dependencies. Do we have any need for python2 in vpp anymore? If python2 APIs are required, can python3 tools generate python2 APIs? --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12845): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12845 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31313432/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-devel install conflicts
On 04/22/2019 06:58 PM, Renato Botelho do Couto wrote: On 22/04/19 17:19, Damjan Marion wrote: On 22 Apr 2019, at 20:24, Renato Botelho do Couto wrote: Hello, When I build vpp using 'make pkg-rpm' on a CentOS 7 without having vpp-ext-deps installed it adds some includes to vpp-devel package that makes it to conflict with rdma-core-devel and kernel-headers: Transaction check error: file /usr/include/infiniband from install of vpp-devel-19.08-rc0~74_g99ad2fc3e.x86_64 conflicts with file from package rdma-core-devel-17.2-3.el7.x86_64 file /usr/include/infiniband/verbs.h from install of vpp-devel-19.08-rc0~74_g99ad2fc3e.x86_64 conflicts with file from package rdma-core-devel-17.2-3.el7.x86_64 file /usr/include/rdma from install of vpp-devel-19.08-rc0~74_g99ad2fc3e.x86_64 conflicts with file from package rdma-core-devel-17.2-3.el7.x86_64 file /usr/include/rdma from install of vpp-devel-19.08-rc0~74_g99ad2fc3e.x86_64 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-3.10.0-957.10.1.el7.x86_64 file /usr/include/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h from install of vpp-devel-19.08-rc0~74_g99ad2fc3e.x86_64 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-3.10.0-957.10.1.el7.x86_64 Are these files supposed to be part of vpp-devel? no If vpp-ext-deps is installed on system during build these headers don't end up on vpp-devel rpm. Yes, not surprised. RPM packaging id not in great shape. Instead of respecting cmake project components, it simply throws all .h files found in build tree into vpp-devel package... Will be great if somebody will pick it up and do it properly. I don't have much interest in messing with RPMs... We were focused on getting cmake support into downstream CentOS. Yes, all header files are stuck in vpp-devel by default. I think there should be a separate rpm for extensions and the spec file should be modified as well. Probably we should look into using cmake to build an rpm and devel rpm for each ext component. I will work on it and submit a patch. Thanks! I will be happy to help and collaborate. Please add me to review on your patch. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12837): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12837 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31300770/675058 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [therb...@redhat.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12844): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12844 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31300770/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 19.04 centos7 RPM package dependency errors
On 04/11/2019 06:48 PM, Paul Vinciguerra wrote: I looked at this a while back. The spec file doesn’t pick up the packages from the makefile. I can look at it in a few hours if you like. Let me know. I had intended to import the new packages from epel into Centos. Epel dependency causes problems for downstream packaging. Since this is a slow process, I can submit a patch to vpp to add the epel dependencies to the spec file since I won't be able to get rid of the epel dependency before the 19.04 release. On Apr 11, 2019, at 6:25 PM, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote: Dave and Ed, The Makefile has dependencies that work. However, you will need epel. The packages required are: yum install epel-release yum install mbedtls yum install python36 --Tom On 04/11/2019 05:11 PM, Florin Coras wrote: We do have it as a dependency because we want to make sure the plugin still builds. However, given that most of those who use tls use the openssl engine, we might consider not having mbedtls as a dependency for the packages that we push to packagecloud ... On a separate note, what centos do we run in the container? It seems that even python3 has some dependency errors. I guess that once we align the vagrant version with it, things should just work. Probably the vagrant image doesn't have some of these packages that are only in epel. Florin On Apr 11, 2019, at 1:55 PM, Ed Kern (ejk) <mailto:e...@cisco.com>> wrote: On Apr 11, 2019, at 2:22 PM, Florin Coras <mailto:fcoras.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: Are we building rpms on a host that has mbedtls installed? Yes the centos container has mbedtls installed….has for quite some time since it is a listed prerequisite straight out of the Makefile. Ed Just uninstalling it should disable the tlsmbedtls plugin, which is what we pretty much want. Florin On Apr 11, 2019, at 1:00 PM, Dave Wallace <mailto:dwallac...@gmail.com>> wrote: Tom/Billy, Do you know what the current status is with the VPP rpm's on master/19.04? I'm trying to install the VPP 19.04 packages frompackagecloud.io <http://packagecloud.io/>on a centos7 Vagrant/virtualbox VM (using .../vpp/extras/vagrant/Vagrantfile) to verify that the packages are correct. The 19.01 packages install fine, but the 19.04 and master packages fail with the following dependency errors: --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: vpp-plugins-19.04-rc1~b4.x86_64 (fdio_1904) Requires: libmbedtls.so.10()(64bit) Error: Package: vpp-devel-19.04-rc1~b4.x86_64 (fdio_1904) Requires: /usr/bin/python3 Error: Package: vpp-19.04-rc1~b4.x86_64 (fdio_1904) Requires: /usr/bin/python3 Error: Package: vpp-plugins-19.04-rc1~b4.x86_64 (fdio_1904) Requires: libmbedx509.so.0()(64bit) Error: Package: vpp-plugins-19.04-rc1~b4.x86_64 (fdio_1904) Requires: libmbedcrypto.so.2()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Thanks, -daw- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12768):https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12768 Mute This Topic:https://lists.fd.io/mt/31034762/675152 Group Owner:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [fcoras.li...@gmail.com <mailto:fcoras.li...@gmail.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12769):https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12769 Mute This Topic:https://lists.fd.io/mt/31034762/675649 Group Owner:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [e...@cisco.com <mailto:e...@cisco.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12773): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12773 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31034762/1594641 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [pvi...@vinciconsulting.com <mailto:pvi...@vinciconsulting.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12775): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12775 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31034762/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 19.04 centos7 RPM package dependency errors
Dave and Ed, The Makefile has dependencies that work. However, you will need epel. The packages required are: yum install epel-release yum install mbedtls yum install python36 --Tom On 04/11/2019 05:11 PM, Florin Coras wrote: We do have it as a dependency because we want to make sure the plugin still builds. However, given that most of those who use tls use the openssl engine, we might consider not having mbedtls as a dependency for the packages that we push to packagecloud ... On a separate note, what centos do we run in the container? It seems that even python3 has some dependency errors. I guess that once we align the vagrant version with it, things should just work. Florin On Apr 11, 2019, at 1:55 PM, Ed Kern (ejk) <mailto:e...@cisco.com>> wrote: On Apr 11, 2019, at 2:22 PM, Florin Coras <mailto:fcoras.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: Are we building rpms on a host that has mbedtls installed? Yes the centos container has mbedtls installed….has for quite some time since it is a listed prerequisite straight out of the Makefile. Ed Just uninstalling it should disable the tlsmbedtls plugin, which is what we pretty much want. Florin On Apr 11, 2019, at 1:00 PM, Dave Wallace <mailto:dwallac...@gmail.com>> wrote: Tom/Billy, Do you know what the current status is with the VPP rpm's on master/19.04? I'm trying to install the VPP 19.04 packages frompackagecloud.io <http://packagecloud.io/>on a centos7 Vagrant/virtualbox VM (using .../vpp/extras/vagrant/Vagrantfile) to verify that the packages are correct. The 19.01 packages install fine, but the 19.04 and master packages fail with the following dependency errors: --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: vpp-plugins-19.04-rc1~b4.x86_64 (fdio_1904) Requires: libmbedtls.so.10()(64bit) Error: Package: vpp-devel-19.04-rc1~b4.x86_64 (fdio_1904) Requires: /usr/bin/python3 Error: Package: vpp-19.04-rc1~b4.x86_64 (fdio_1904) Requires: /usr/bin/python3 Error: Package: vpp-plugins-19.04-rc1~b4.x86_64 (fdio_1904) Requires: libmbedx509.so.0()(64bit) Error: Package: vpp-plugins-19.04-rc1~b4.x86_64 (fdio_1904) Requires: libmbedcrypto.so.2()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Thanks, -daw- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12768):https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12768 Mute This Topic:https://lists.fd.io/mt/31034762/675152 Group Owner:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [fcoras.li...@gmail.com <mailto:fcoras.li...@gmail.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12769):https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12769 Mute This Topic:https://lists.fd.io/mt/31034762/675649 Group Owner:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [e...@cisco.com <mailto:e...@cisco.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12773): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12773 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31034762/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] Use of cmake breaks builds in master https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18600/
On 04/01/2019 05:44 AM, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote: On 31 Mar 2019, at 05:39, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote: Damjan, I attempted to fix a problem with use of cmake breaking CentOS builds with the patch introduced with the new rdma-core and quicly driver. I had this fixed with patch https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18600/ but it wouldn't rebase after another change with quicly. The patch no longer applies because the quickly.mk in gone and the problem appears after a patch of some upstream code. Could you please take a look at this: Submodule path 'deps/picotls': checked out '70cd2a60125729f6d6c32c2ace36403b2b6168e6' --- patching quicly f25b70d37f8974af9cc48a4a565d13a9cdc5fd75 Applying patch: 0001-cmake-install.patch patching file CMakeLists.txt patching file deps/picotls/CMakeLists.txt --- configuring quicly f25b70d37f8974af9cc48a4a565d13a9cdc5fd75 - log: /home/therbert/vpp/build-root/rpmbuild/vpp-19.04/build-root/build-vpp-native/external/quicly.config.log --- building quicly f25b70d37f8974af9cc48a4a565d13a9cdc5fd75 - log: /home/therbert/vpp/build-root/rpmbuild/vpp-19.04/build-root/build-vpp-native/external/quicly.build.log /bin/bash: cmake: command not found make[5]: *** [packages/quicly.mk:43: /home/therbert/vpp/build-root/rpmbuild/vpp-19.04/build-root/build-vpp-native/external/.quicly.build.ok] Error 127 Yes, i reverted quicly packaging changes as they need a bit of polishing so you need to rebase your patch. My patch is re-based but is this reversion you speak of merged yet? I don't see it on master? -- Damjan -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12683): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12683 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30840381/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[vpp-dev] Use of cmake breaks builds in master https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18600/
Damjan, I attempted to fix a problem with use of cmake breaking CentOS builds with the patch introduced with the new rdma-core and quicly driver. I had this fixed with patch https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18600/ but it wouldn't rebase after another change with quicly. The patch no longer applies because the quickly.mk in gone and the problem appears after a patch of some upstream code. Could you please take a look at this: Submodule path 'deps/picotls': checked out '70cd2a60125729f6d6c32c2ace36403b2b6168e6' --- patching quicly f25b70d37f8974af9cc48a4a565d13a9cdc5fd75 Applying patch: 0001-cmake-install.patch patching file CMakeLists.txt patching file deps/picotls/CMakeLists.txt --- configuring quicly f25b70d37f8974af9cc48a4a565d13a9cdc5fd75 - log: /home/therbert/vpp/build-root/rpmbuild/vpp-19.04/build-root/build-vpp-native/external/quicly.config.log --- building quicly f25b70d37f8974af9cc48a4a565d13a9cdc5fd75 - log: /home/therbert/vpp/build-root/rpmbuild/vpp-19.04/build-root/build-vpp-native/external/quicly.build.log /bin/bash: cmake: command not found make[5]: *** [packages/quicly.mk:43: /home/therbert/vpp/build-root/rpmbuild/vpp-19.04/build-root/build-vpp-native/external/.quicly.build.ok] Error 127 Thanks, --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12679): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12679 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30840381/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] Mellanox dependency changes
+Artem +vpp-dev On 03/27/2019 11:22 AM, Sirshak Das wrote: Hi Thomas Is this the patch under consideration ? https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18521/ So will this make mlx4/5 dpdk compilation default ? What about MOFED dependencies (Kernel Modules and all userspace verb libraries) ? With regard to CentOS, necessary kmods are loaded when rdma-core rpm is loaded, I heard its all now Upstreamed in Kernel but that’s post 4.20, so how would that work for distros with kernel version lower and MOFED uninstalled (ubuntu 18.04). I don't know the solution for Ubuntu 1604. There is no OFED required for CentOS7.6. CentOS7.6: This is the good news resolved for CentOS 7.6 and I have verified for 19.01 with patch above on CNCF packet.net infrastructure. Ubuntu1604: For Ubuntu, 1604 there is still have a problem: https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-ubuntu1604/18353/console ... *21:27:39* /w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-ubuntu1604/build/external/deb/_build/dpdk-19.02/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.h:19:31: fatal error: infiniband/mlx5dv.h: No such file or directory *21:27:39* compilation terminated. Artem's patch, https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/18199/ Also fails for Ubuntu1604 Ubuntu1804: Seems to be buiding: https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-beta-verify-master-ubuntu1804/6150/ Thank you ++ Sirshak Das IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12651): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12651 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30795618/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] Build failure question
On 03/05/2019 09:40 AM, Damjan Marion wrote: On 5 Mar 2019, at 15:14, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 03/05/2019 02:37 AM, Damjan Marion wrote: On 4 Mar 2019, at 22:52, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote: Damjan et. al. I get build failures when builging from a tarball outside of git tree on 19.01 I documented this in https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1577 This is not reproduceable when building in git tree. Could you please take a look at the cmake output and give me some suggestions. —Tom It is likely fixed in master, please try with master. Yes, I believe it is fixed in master. Do you know which commit fixed it? May be: Yes, Thanks! I found it and backported the patch and am testing it. I had already found the problem with pack.cmake but missed the version include changes. I will update JIRA 1577 with results in case we decide to backport it. Author: Damjan Marion mailto:damar...@cisco.com>> AuthorDate: Mon Jan 28 17:55:59 2019 +0100 Commit: Marco Varlese <mailto:marco.varl...@suse.de>> CommitDate: Tue Jan 29 07:47:01 2019 + cmake: fix out-of-git-tree build Change-Id: Ib94637ec09799c23f3179599b54a2be6e2768425 Signed-off-by: Damjan Marion <mailto:damar...@cisco.com>> -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12436): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12436 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30219549/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] Build failure question
On 03/05/2019 02:37 AM, Damjan Marion wrote: On 4 Mar 2019, at 22:52, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote: Damjan et. al. I get build failures when builging from a tarball outside of git tree on 19.01 I documented this in https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1577 This is not reproduceable when building in git tree. Could you please take a look at the cmake output and give me some suggestions. —Tom It is likely fixed in master, please try with master. Yes, I believe it is fixed in master. Do you know which commit fixed it? -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12434): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12434 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30219549/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] Build failure question
On 03/04/2019 05:12 PM, Paul Vinciguerra wrote: Is this a “must have” or a “nice to have” feature? I guess what I’m really asking is if this belongs in a CI job. This breaks the building of downstream RPMs for CentOS. Until the 1807 release, we have been maintaining this feature. The downstream RPMs are built from a spec file and tarball created by the dist target in the top level Makefile I am trying to write a patch to fix it. It would be preferable to have the patch backported but for now, I am looking for help from CMake experts to see what is causing this side affect. Paul On Mar 4, 2019, at 4:52 PM, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote: Damjan et. al. I get build failures when builging from a tarball outside of git tree on 19.01 I documented this in https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1577 This is not reproduceable when building in git tree. Could you please take a look at the cmake output and give me some suggestions. --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12423): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12423 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30219549/1594641 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [pvi...@vinciconsulting.com <mailto:pvi...@vinciconsulting.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12425): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12425 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30219549/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[vpp-dev] Build failure question
Damjan et. al. I get build failures when builging from a tarball outside of git tree on 19.01 I documented this in https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1577 This is not reproduceable when building in git tree. Could you please take a look at the cmake output and give me some suggestions. --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12423): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12423 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30219549/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[vpp-dev] Status of vpp 19.01 in CentOS distribution
Jerome and VPP community: This is the status of vpp release packages in CentOS. There are no upstream issues or build issues. The current status is that some of the dependent packages required for building vpp were not tagged properly for the CentOS build system buildroot. As soon as that is resolved, we will push vpp 19.01 release packages to the mirrors. ETA should be end of February or the beginning of March. --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12291): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12291 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/29930611/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] Build failing on Fedora
I just verified with top of master that vpp builds fine on Fedora 28. As for the current Centos release 7.5, you must install epel as below which is not explicitly in build dependencies. yum install epel-release On 11/26/2018 01:57 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: On Nov 26, 2018, at 12:05 PM, Burt Silverman <mailto:bur...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Ed, Thank you for looking at my change, and I apologize for some laziness -- I should have made it more clear that I was only doing part of the job -- not adding the needed ifeq's so that this Fedora stuff would be isolated from other platforms. I leave it to somebody else to finish the job. Ouch, even the line I was most proud of has a glitch: + @sudo -E dnf debuginfo-install $(CONFIRM) glibc openssl-libs mbedtls-devel zlib openssl-libs I did not mean to add openssl-libs at the end (it already shows earlier in the line). The main goody (for Fedora) is that "dnf debuginfo-install" as opposed to simply "debuginfo-install" made an error disappear. The latter fails in an ungraceful fashion; I have not looked into that very deeply. Burt I’ve been dealing with this by installing epel. Fresh minimal 7.5 install on top of QEMU on a Mac (thanks to Damjan for pointing out that the newest QEMU uses hypervisor.framework!) https://gist.github.com/gonzopancho/4091e160f2cb86c0a94674b554ff#file-gistfile1-txt-L889-L890 https://gist.github.com/gonzopancho/4091e160f2cb86c0a94674b554ff#file-gistfile1-txt-L3995-L4254 And was about to write vpp-dev about same. So do we want epel here, and thus cmake3? Jim -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11416): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11416 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28281426/675058 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [therb...@redhat.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11418): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11418 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28281426/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] Build failing on Fedora
It is set to cmake3 cmake isn't available in Centos but cmake3 is. We should patch Makefile so Fedora dep is cmake but Centos/RHEL is cmake3. I will work on a fix. --Tom On 11/26/2018 01:57 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: On Nov 26, 2018, at 12:05 PM, Burt Silverman <mailto:bur...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Ed, Thank you for looking at my change, and I apologize for some laziness -- I should have made it more clear that I was only doing part of the job -- not adding the needed ifeq's so that this Fedora stuff would be isolated from other platforms. I leave it to somebody else to finish the job. Ouch, even the line I was most proud of has a glitch: + @sudo -E dnf debuginfo-install $(CONFIRM) glibc openssl-libs mbedtls-devel zlib openssl-libs I did not mean to add openssl-libs at the end (it already shows earlier in the line). The main goody (for Fedora) is that "dnf debuginfo-install" as opposed to simply "debuginfo-install" made an error disappear. The latter fails in an ungraceful fashion; I have not looked into that very deeply. Burt I’ve been dealing with this by installing epel. Fresh minimal 7.5 install on top of QEMU on a Mac (thanks to Damjan for pointing out that the newest QEMU uses hypervisor.framework!) https://gist.github.com/gonzopancho/4091e160f2cb86c0a94674b554ff#file-gistfile1-txt-L889-L890 https://gist.github.com/gonzopancho/4091e160f2cb86c0a94674b554ff#file-gistfile1-txt-L3995-L4254 And was about to write vpp-dev about same. So do we want epel here, and thus cmake3? Jim -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11416): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11416 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28281426/675058 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [therb...@redhat.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11417): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11417 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28281426/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 18.07.1 RPM release packages available in Centos
All, 18.07.1 release packages are in Centos mirrors. To install Centos update release packages of VPP on a Centos, install the Centos NFV SIG yum repo and then install vpp as follows. yum install centos-release-fdio yum install vpp* If already installed, yum update --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10731): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10731 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/26654231/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 18.07 RPM release packages available in Centos
Jerome, 18.07 release packages are in Centos mirrors. To install Centos release packages of VPP on a Centos, install the Centos NFV SIG yum repo and then install vpp as follows. yum install centos-release-fdio yum install vpp* --Tom On 05/23/2018 10:32 AM, Jerome Tollet (jtollet) wrote: Hey Thomas, Can you let us know what you are planning to do for next releases? Are you manually building those RPMs or will you automatically include bugfix versions as well as future versions (e.g. 18.07)? Jerome On 5/21/2018 12:24 PM, Thomas F Herbert wrote: VPP 18.04 RPMs are available in the Centos mirrors by way of the Centos NFV SIG. From an updated Centos: To install VPP on a Centos host, intall the Centos NFV SIG yum repo and then install vpp as follows. yum install centos-release-fdio yum install vpp* --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* _._,_._,_ Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#9338)<https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/9338>| Reply To Sender<mailto:dwallac...@gmail.com?subject=Private:%20Re:%20Re%3A%20%5Bvpp-dev%5D%20VPP%20RPMs%20available%20in%20Centos>| Reply To Group<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io?subject=Re:%20Re%3A%20%5Bvpp-dev%5D%20VPP%20RPMs%20available%20in%20Centos>| Mute This Topic<https://lists.fd.io/mt/19673150/675291>| New Topic<https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/post> Change Your Subscription<https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/editsub/675291> Group Home<https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev> Contact Group Owner<mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io> Terms Of Service<https://lists.fd.io/static/tos> Unsubscribe From This Group<https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub> _._,_._,_ -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10492): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10492 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/25646023/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] IRC SPAM
On 08/22/2018 09:14 PM, Burt Silverman wrote: That pidgin client is totally bizarre. For hours it would not cooperate regardless of what I told it. When it decided to cooperate, then even if I removed my password information, it still let me log in without shunting me to the land of undesirables. Meanwhile, I found the hidden trick to make the webchat interface work. Weird. Another note about pidgin: I find it reconnects only on startup particularly with many simultaneous chats! If you lose your network connection, you restart the app or kill -9 the pidgin process. Set all chats for persistence and auto re-connect. I think it has trouble restarting many tcp connections simultaneously because of backoff. See my email elsewhere on this chain about settings. Burt On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 08/22/2018 02:01 PM, Burt Silverman wrote: I registered and verified, but when I try to log in I always go to the unregistered area. How do I log in now? The instructions are pretty useless for a non SASL client user. I can only tell you my settings for irc. Hopefully it will help. I use pidgin client. I log on with my username and password and it is set for SSL, and authenticates with SASL. I connect to irc.freenode.net <http://irc.freenode.net> Burt On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Vanessa Valderrama mailto:vvalderr...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: In effort to prevent IRC SPAM we are requiring registration in the FD.io channels. * The following channels will require registration to join the channel o https://wiki.fd.io/view/IRC * Please follow these steps to register on Freenode o https://freenode.net/kb/answer/registration <https://freenode.net/kb/answer/registration> Thank you, Vanessa -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10257): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10257 <https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10257> Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/541103 <https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/541103> Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev%2bow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub <https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub> [bur...@gmail.com <mailto:bur...@gmail.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10259):https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10259 <https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10259> Mute This Topic:https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/675058 <https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/675058> Group Owner:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub <https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub> [therb...@redhat.com <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10260): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10260 <https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10260> Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/541103 <https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/541103> Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev%2bow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub <https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub> [bur...@gmail.com <mailto:bur...@gmail.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10281): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10281 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] IRC SPAM
See below:
On 08/23/2018 03:49 PM, Burt Silverman wrote:
Hi Tom,
Although I don't need to use pidgin, my obsessive gene has kicked in:
the idea that it should work reliably, but does not for me -- can you
give a complete list of the connection settings -- the Basic and the
Advanced Settings -- perhaps with some commentary? Anyway, it seems
that some things get "cached" so that if one tries to put in good
settings after using bad settings -- it may not work out. I have tried
it on Windows and on Ubuntu. I guess it temporarily worked on Windows;
I have no idea why. Thanks, Tom.
These are my settings.
Caveat: I have no idea about using a web client as I don't use it. Also,
there may be differences among clients as
I use pidgin and have been for some time on Fedora and previously on a
Mac but I don't remember the Mac version.
Version: 2.13.0-1.fc27.x86_64
Protocol: IRC
Username <...yours...>
Server irc.freenode.net
Password <...yours...>
Port: 6697
Use SSL
Authenticate with SASL
Burt
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Thomas F Herbert
mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote:
More on using IRC...
One of our colleagues had some trouble connecting today.
I think we figured out that since freenode IRC now requires
everyone to authenticate and you are logging in with passwd
authentication, you have to connect through SSL but not all of the
old ports will work with SSL.
Mine works consistently on port 6697 with SSL. Some folks were
using legacy ports that no longer will work.
I use Pidgin so I have no idea how this will affect those using
the web client.
--Tom
On 08/22/2018 02:39 PM, Thomas F Herbert wrote:
On 08/22/2018 02:01 PM, Burt Silverman wrote:
I registered and verified, but when I try to log in I always go
to the unregistered area. How do I log in now? The instructions
are pretty useless for a non SASL client user.
I can only tell you my settings for irc. Hopefully it will help.
I use pidgin client.
I log on with my username and password and it is set for SSL, and
authenticates with SASL. I connect to irc.freenode.net
<http://irc.freenode.net>
Burt
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Vanessa Valderrama
mailto:vvalderr...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
In effort to prevent IRC SPAM we are requiring registration
in the FD.io channels.
* The following channels will require registration to join
the channel
o https://wiki.fd.io/view/IRC
* Please follow these steps to register on Freenode
o https://freenode.net/kb/answer/registration
<https://freenode.net/kb/answer/registration>
Thank you,
Vanessa
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#10257):
https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10257
<https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10257>
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/541103
<https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/541103>
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
<mailto:vpp-dev%2bow...@lists.fd.io>
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub
<https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub> [bur...@gmail.com
<mailto:bur...@gmail.com>]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#10259):https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10259
<https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10259>
Mute This Topic:https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/675058
<https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/675058>
Group Owner:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io>
Unsubscribe:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub
<https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub> [therb...@redhat.com
<mailto:therb...@redhat.com>]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
NFV and Fast Data Planes
Networking Group Office of the CTO
*Red Hat*
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#10260):https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10260
<https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10260>
Mute This Topic:https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/675058
<https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/675058>
Group Owner:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io>
Unsubscribe:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub
<https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub> [therb...@redhat.com
<mailto:therb...@redhat.com>]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
NFV and Fast Data Planes
Networking Group Office of the CTO
*Red Hat*
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all message
Re: [vpp-dev] IRC SPAM
More on using IRC... One of our colleagues had some trouble connecting today. I think we figured out that since freenode IRC now requires everyone to authenticate and you are logging in with passwd authentication, you have to connect through SSL but not all of the old ports will work with SSL. Mine works consistently on port 6697 with SSL. Some folks were using legacy ports that no longer will work. I use Pidgin so I have no idea how this will affect those using the web client. --Tom On 08/22/2018 02:39 PM, Thomas F Herbert wrote: On 08/22/2018 02:01 PM, Burt Silverman wrote: I registered and verified, but when I try to log in I always go to the unregistered area. How do I log in now? The instructions are pretty useless for a non SASL client user. I can only tell you my settings for irc. Hopefully it will help. I use pidgin client. I log on with my username and password and it is set for SSL, and authenticates with SASL. I connect to irc.freenode.net Burt On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Vanessa Valderrama <mailto:vvalderr...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: In effort to prevent IRC SPAM we are requiring registration in the FD.io channels. * The following channels will require registration to join the channel o https://wiki.fd.io/view/IRC * Please follow these steps to register on Freenode o https://freenode.net/kb/answer/registration <https://freenode.net/kb/answer/registration> Thank you, Vanessa -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10257): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10257 <https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10257> Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/541103 <https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/541103> Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev%2bow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub <https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub> [bur...@gmail.com <mailto:bur...@gmail.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10259):https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10259 Mute This Topic:https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/675058 Group Owner:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe:https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [therb...@redhat.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10260): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10260 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/675058 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [therb...@redhat.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10271): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10271 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] IRC SPAM
On 08/22/2018 02:01 PM, Burt Silverman wrote: I registered and verified, but when I try to log in I always go to the unregistered area. How do I log in now? The instructions are pretty useless for a non SASL client user. I can only tell you my settings for irc. Hopefully it will help. I use pidgin client. I log on with my username and password and it is set for SSL, and authenticates with SASL. I connect to irc.freenode.net Burt On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Vanessa Valderrama <mailto:vvalderr...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: In effort to prevent IRC SPAM we are requiring registration in the FD.io channels. * The following channels will require registration to join the channel o https://wiki.fd.io/view/IRC * Please follow these steps to register on Freenode o https://freenode.net/kb/answer/registration <https://freenode.net/kb/answer/registration> Thank you, Vanessa -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10257): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10257 <https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10257> Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/541103 <https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/541103> Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev%2bow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub <https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub> [bur...@gmail.com <mailto:bur...@gmail.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10259): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10259 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/675058 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [therb...@redhat.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10260): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10260 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24921658/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] Destination Options processing in VPP
+ Daniel Voyer +Daniel Bernier On 08/21/2018 12:24 PM, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io wrote: Hi Tom and welcome to vpp-dev, On 21 Aug 2018, at 16:28, Tom Herbert wrote: Hello, I have some questions regarding Destination Options processing in VPP. Basically, I'd like to know they are properly supported per RFC8200. Probably not. I not, then I'd like to request the VPP stack is fixed to be protocol compliant in this. We do have SRV6 support. Are you saying from your code inspection that we have a non-compliance issue with RFC8200 or are you claiming a non-compliance issue with current segment routing drafts. Also, if this is a non-compliance issue, to your knowledge, has this been verified with testing? As you know VPP is open source project, we like to be standards compliant and we like new features. Showing up on the mailing list first time and immediately requesting somebody to do the work is a bit unfair. I'm sure people will try to help if you or somebody who works with you wants to work on this problem, but you cannot expect that folks will just stop doing what they do just to do the work you requested. Thanks, Damjan -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10242): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10242 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24877418/675058 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [therb...@redhat.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10246): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10246 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24877418/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] :: vppctl fails to start in Container (Centos 7.5.1804)
Billy and I are looking into it right now. On 08/15/2018 07:51 AM, Ed Warnicke wrote: Tom, Do you perhaps have more insight here? Ed On August 15, 2018 at 5:00:32 AM, omer.maj...@sofioni.com <mailto:omer.maj...@sofioni.com> (omer.maj...@sofioni.com <mailto:omer.maj...@sofioni.com>) wrote: Thanks Ed, in centos installing vpp automatically installs vpp-selinux-policy with it. So enforcing selinux on the host machine make vpp work. However, when I try installing VPP in centos container there vpp doesn't start. Can't enforce selinux in container and vpp-selinux-policy is installed with vpp due to dependency. When I run vpp in the container $docker exec /usr/bin/vpp -c /etc/vpp/startup.conf I get following errors tls_openssl_init:650: failed to initialize TLS CA chain dpdk_config: mount failed 1 Seems like an selinux issue or what? Could I get any help there? :) Best Regards, Omer On 2018-08-13 22:43, Edward Warnicke wrote: We do have an se linux package that should in principle let you keep working with se linux enforce try yum install vpp-selinux-policy and see if that helps :) Ed On August 13, 2018 at 12:41:37 PM, omer.maj...@sofioni.com <mailto:omer.maj...@sofioni.com> (omer.maj...@sofioni.com <mailto:omer.maj...@sofioni.com>) wrote: Thank Ed. Changed SELINUX=enforcing in /etc/selinux/config Restarted the machine, and it worked. Best Regards, Omer On 2018-08-13 22:21, Edward Warnicke wrote: This feels like SE Linux may be involved... Ed On August 13, 2018 at 12:17:09 PM, omer.maj...@sofioni.com <mailto:omer.maj...@sofioni.com> (omer.maj...@sofioni.com <mailto:omer.maj...@sofioni.com>) wrote: Hi, I've built VPP on centos 7.5.1804, took the RPM packages to another machine to deploy VPP there. After installing RPM packages there when I run $vppctl it gives me following error. *clib_socket_init: connect (fd 3, '/run/vpp/cli.sock'): No such file or directory* I thought there might be something wrong with the build or something so took packages from following repository http://a.centos.org/centos/7.5.1804/nfv/x86_64/fdio/vpp/vpp-1804/ I get the same error when running vppctl after installation. Could someone help with the error? Best Regards, Omer -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10126): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10126 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24505099/464962 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [hagb...@gmail.com <mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10127): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10127 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24505099/984664 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [omer.maj...@sofioni.com <mailto:omer.maj...@sofioni.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10129): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10129 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24505099/984664 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io> Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [omer.maj...@sofioni.com <mailto:omer.maj...@sofioni.com>] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10170): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10170 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24532686/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [vpp-dev] dpdk shared libraries
On 06/04/2018 09:28 AM, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote: Dear Thomas, That should be doable today, as long as VPP version supports version of dpdk you want to link against. From the spec file you can invoke autotools project directly, and pass --enable-dpdk-shared to ./configure ./configure --enable-dpdk-shared --prefix=/wherever/rpm/spec/file/wants/files/to/show/up make make install I don't expect any perf difference, but the open question is how the distro dpdk libs deal with different vector optimisations I assume you are speaking of AVX? It looks like upstream DPDK (default settings) and the fedora RPM both have AVX2 enabled but not AVX512. I think that is consistent of what we do in VPP when we compile dpdk. -- Damjan On 4 Jun 2018, at 13:51, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote: OVS as of 9.x now uses shared libraries with dpdk packaged separately for downstream I want to raise the issue of shared vs. static libraries for dpdk in vpp. Would there be any performance penalty to going with shared? --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat*
[vpp-dev] dpdk shared libraries
OVS as of 9.x now uses shared libraries with dpdk packaged separately for downstream I want to raise the issue of shared vs. static libraries for dpdk in vpp. Would there be any performance penalty to going with shared? --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat*
Re: [vpp-dev] VPP RPMs available in Centos
Jerome, Currently, it is a manual process but not a terribly time intensive one. 18.04 and 18.01.1 are in the mirrors now. 18.01.2 within a week. 18.07 will require a minor bug fix in Centos infra with anticipated for Centos 7.5 hopefully before vpp 18.07 release date. --Tom On 05/23/2018 10:32 AM, Jerome Tollet (jtollet) wrote: Hey Thomas, Can you let us know what you are planning to do for next releases? Are you manually building those RPMs or will you automatically include bugfix versions as well as future versions (e.g. 18.07)? Jerome On 5/21/2018 12:24 PM, Thomas F Herbert wrote: VPP 18.04 RPMs are available in the Centos mirrors by way of the Centos NFV SIG. From an updated Centos: To install VPP on a Centos host, intall the Centos NFV SIG yum repo and then install vpp as follows. yum install centos-release-fdio yum install vpp* --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat*
Re: [vpp-dev] git.fd.io not updating
I noticed this with an attempted git pull. The ECDSA host key for [gerrit.fd.io]:29418 has changed, Surrounded by nasty warnings. On 05/22/2018 02:58 AM, Marco Varlese wrote: Roughly a week ago, I noticed there was a DNS/IP change when cloning a new VPP repo... I wonder if what I saw is somehow connected to this issue. On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 16:34 -0700, Florin Coras wrote: Hi, It would seem that git.fd.io <http://git.fd.io> [1] thinks that we last committed a patch to vpp almost 1 week ago. Any idea what might’ve triggered this? Thanks, Florin [1] https://git.fd.io/vpp/log/ -- Marco V SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat*
[vpp-dev] VPP RPMs available in Centos
VPP 18.04 RPMs are available in the Centos mirrors by way of the Centos NFV SIG. From an updated Centos: To install VPP on a Centos host, intall the Centos NFV SIG yum repo and then install vpp as follows. yum install centos-release-fdio yum install vpp* --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat*
Re: [vpp-dev] Patches for 18.04
Chris and John Thanks. will do. --Tom On 04/06/2018 03:53 PM, Chris Luke wrote: You can cherry pick them to the stable branch, though preferably with a Jira ID in the first line (you can amend the commit message after you cherry pick it). Chris. *From:*vpp-dev@lists.fd.io *On Behalf Of *Thomas F Herbert *Sent:* Friday, April 6, 2018 14:38 *To:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io *Cc:* vpp-dev ; Billy McFall *Subject:* [vpp-dev] Patches for 18.04 Chris, I submitted two patches to master that should be in stable/18.04. 11556: Merged in Master: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/11556 11551: Submitted but not merged yet in master: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/11551 <https://gerrit.fd.io/r/11551> What should I do? Should I resubmit both patches direct to stable/18.04? --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat*
Re: [vpp-dev] What RPM contains vpp debug symbols?
Yichen,
Sorry it took me a long time to respond. debuginfo rpms were not
produced for 17.10 and 18.01 because of a side affect of a "fix" to work
around a problem with rpmbuild.
The plan is to restore the building of debuginfo rpms in 18.04 and
subsequent releases.
This is documented in
https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1227
--Tom
On 04/02/2018 02:21 PM, Yichen Wang wrote:
Hi, Thomas,
Just want to revive this thread… Do we know when can we have this
fixed? We are testing and will likely to ship with VPP 18.04 once the
final release comes out. Having the debuginfo RPM is **very**
important in our product, as it will give clues when VPP crashes.
Given it has been broken for 6months+, we would really need your helps
so that we have the debuginfo RPM before we finalize our code.
Thanks very much!
Regards,
Yichen
*From: *Dave Wallace
*Date: *Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 8:20 PM
*To: *Billy McFall
*Cc: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , "Yichen Wang
(yicwang)"
*Subject: *Re: [vpp-dev] What RPM contains vpp debug symbols?
Thanks for the info Billy!
-daw-
On 1/25/18 8:26 PM, Billy McFall wrote:
'make pkg-rpm' is currently not generating an RPM with debug
symbols. There is a bug in rpmbuild for packages with short names
(i.e. - vpp) that was not allowing RPMs to be built upstream in
CentOS and RHEL. The work around is to add a -0 to the package
name to make it long enough. Much later after this change was
merged, it was discovered that the debug RPM was not being built.
Thomas Herbert is tracking the issue. rpmbuild has been fixed in
Fedora but that fix has not been pulled into CentOS or RHEL. Not
sure when it will make it. Thomas can give more details, I am just
regurgitating what he previously reported to me.
Billy McFall
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Dave Wallace
mailto:dwallac...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Does anyone know what RPM contains debug symbols?
Back in VPP 17.07 there used to be an RPM package called
vpp-debuginfo-*.x86_64.rpm, but that package is no longer
installed on nexus.fd.io<http://nexus.fd.io>starting with
release 17.10
https://nexus.fd.io/content/repositories/fd.io.stable.1707.centos7/io/fd/vpp/vpp-debuginfo/17.07.01-release.x86_64/vpp-debuginfo-17.07.01-release.x86_64.rpm
Thanks,
-daw-
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
--
*Billy McFall*
Networking Group
CTO Office
*Red Hat*
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
NFV and Fast Data Planes
Networking Group Office of the CTO
*Red Hat*
[vpp-dev] Patches for 18.04
Chris, I submitted two patches to master that should be in stable/18.04. 11556: Merged in Master: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/11556 11551: Submitted but not merged yet in master: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/11551 What should I do? Should I resubmit both patches direct to stable/18.04? --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat*
Re: [vpp-dev] Sad News from Intel - Venky Venkatesan
Jim, Thanks for letting us know. I am very sorry to hear about Venky's passing. --Tom On 04/05/2018 02:36 PM, St Leger, Jim wrote: Several of you have already heard the very sad news of the passing of our dear friend and colleague Venky. He was “Mr. DPDK” to many, a nod to his invention and creation of DPDK about ten years ago (before it was called DPDK.) Of course his footprints across the industry and literally across the globe are everywhere. If you know what ATCA is, well, Venky had his hands and inventions deeply into the creation of that PICMG spec and many of the first revision products. He touched on and gave guidance to projects spanning Linux/netdev, DPDK, Intel QuickAssist Technology, BSD stacks, OVS, OPNFV, FD.io, all-things-virtualization (KVM, Xen, VMware, Hyper-V, etc.), ETSI, IETF, containers, and so many other arenas that my brain can’t remember at this dark moment. If you knew him and engaged him, especially on deep technical discussions, you knew you were talking to someone with the rare combination of skills that went incredibly deep both on the hardware, silicon side of platforms but also on the software, networking side of the platforms. Rarely did I find a topic that Venky wasn’t well versed on. And by “topic” I mean everything from football to photography to history to politics and many other subjects well beyond the technical realm our day jobs find us in. Conversations with Venky were a treat. Traveling with him was an adventure. Debating with him was a lesson. I will so miss all of him. Below are some details on a memorial service this Sunday in Oregon and also a GoFundMe page. If you’re in Oregon or close by please join the service. Venky left behind a wife, Priya, and two young girls, Adhiti and Namrata. While I’m sure they are overwhelmed with sadness and grief at the moment they can use our support. Please consider supporting the GoFundMe memorial fund for his family. Lastly, my network extends through this distribution list. But Venky’s network was one hundred times broader. Please share this sad news through your own networks. Thanks, Jim *From:* A message from Sandra Rivera *Sent:* Thursday, April 5, 2018 10:58 AM *Subject:* Follow-up: A loss for our NPG organization All, We have an update on the memorial service plans in celebration of Venky Venkatesan’s life. The service will be held on Sunday, April 8^th at our Jones Farm Conference Center (JFCC) in Hillsboro, OR from 2-4PM, and is open to all who would like to join. Venky’s family will plan to attend, as well as friends and others who have worked closely with him over the years.Please note that this is not an Intel-sponsored event and therefore any travel or expenses related to attending need to be managed personally. Many of you have asked about donations, and we have helped setup a GoFundMe account for his family which will be used to fund scholarships for his children. https://www.gofundme.com/venky-venkatesan-memorial-fund If you have any questions about the service, please contact *Udayan Mukherjee*. Thank you all very much for your support during this difficult time. Sandra ** *From:* A message from Sandra Rivera *Sent:* Tuesday, April 3, 2018 9:34 PM *Subject:* A loss for our NPG organization To All, Today is a very sad day for our NPG team and Intel. Our dear friend and colleague, Venky Venkatesan, passed away early morning today after a tough battle with cancer. Aside from his deep contributions to the organization, Venky provided technical mentorship to many employees and greatly impacted our technical leadership pipeline. On a personal level, Venky was very dedicated to his family and also cared deeply about mentoring the next generation of engineers and scientists through efforts like coaching robotics teams and providing guidance to many interns and Intel employees. His passion, dedication and commitment to this organization, Intel, and the external community will be greatly missed. We will let you know as soon as more information is available for Venky’s memorial/celebration service. Sandra -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat*
[vpp-dev] mbedtls in 18.04
WRT mbedtls: This issue was raised in a vpp meeting a few weeks ago. There was some discussion of making mbedtls package optional instead of a hard dependency for tls. Did we reach consensus on the mbedtls requirement one way or the other? Billy and I are preparing for 18.04 for Centos and RHEL. mbedtls is in Fedora/EPEL but not in RHEL and Centos and creates problems for us for these distros. If the consensus is to leave mbedtls as a hard requirement upstream, we could carry a patch in the downstream packaging for release 18.04 but we would prefer to have as few deviations as possible from upstream packaging. --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat*
[vpp-dev] subunit requirement
Garbriel and all, I am working on the release packaging for 18.01.1 for Centos. I want to discuss the subunit requirement in deps and in the spec file originally introduced in this patch. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=vpp.git;a=commitdiff;h=d3e671e0dbb879d90f00bdee608ee0bb5f6357ae Although subunit is in Fedora (and EPEL), it is not available in Centos so the subunit requirement breaks release builds for Centos. The following patch was merged in October and cherry-picked into 1710 which made this requirement Fedora only. e41289115ffb24d95a5d0bc2ef33001d06a28688 Subsequently in this commit b8bbd6521fbab6579e4c571f61489f995f56bc78, it was made a requirement for Centos as well. I want to propose an upstream patch to remove the subunit requirement for Centos but I should check with everyone as to the implications. --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat*
Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-comparison-18.01 - Invitation to comment
mprehend. One thing that stands out to me is that VPP in general has much higher variability between the recorded samples than OVS (the exception being tests where OVS scored very low; the variability there is quite high since small differences between each sample are magnified). The general trend is that VPP variability is increasing at 1M flows and it's a bit mixed at 256 and 10K flows. Open in Sheets <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jFoQZieTT93xikWcjZU08J1kF6qn_tjTTC0A3mu0yyo/edit?usp=sharing_eip&ts=5a78b247> Google Sheets: Create and edit spreadsheets online. Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA <https://maps.google.com/?q=1600+Amphitheatre+Parkway,+Mountain+View,+CA+94043,+USA&entry=gmail&source=g> You have received this email because someone shared a spreadsheet with you from Google Sheets. Logo for Google Sheets <https://drive.google.com> -- *Billy McFall* Networking Group CTO Office *Red Hat* -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat*
Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] t4-virl3 moved from testing back into production - SSH timouts on VIRL
tup VPP PIDs: {'10.30.53.219': 23424,
'10.30.53.218': 5433}
*02:03:23.456*Test Teardown VPP PIDs: None
*02:03:23.458*| FAIL |
*02:03:23.458*Expected error 'ICMP echo Rx timeout' but got
'NoValidConnectionsError: [Errno None] Unable to connect to port
22 on or 10.30.53.220'.
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/csit-vpp-functional-1801-ubuntu1604-virl/212/consoleFull
*00:40:57.431*TC02: Process tagged send untagged [ ERROR ] VAT
script execution timeout: sudo -S vpp_api_test in
/tmp/openvpp-testing/resources/templates/vat/show_trace.vat script
*00:41:53.602*| FAIL |
*00:41:53.603*Teardown failed:
*00:41:53.603*SSHTimeout: Timeout exception during execution of
command: sudo -S vpp_api_test in
/tmp/openvpp-testing/resources/templates/vat/show_trace.vat script
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/csit-vpp-functional-1801-centos7-virl/212/consoleFull
*02:00:59.621*TC07: DUT1 and DUT2 with L2BD and VLAN translate-2-2
with wrong outer tag used (DUT1) switch ICMPv6 between two TG
links :: ... [ WARN ]
Tests.Vpp.Func.L2Bd.Eth2P-Dot1Ad-L2Bdbasemaclrn-Vlantrans22-Func -
TC07: DUT1 and DUT2 with L2BD and VLAN translate-2-2 with wrong
outer tag used (DUT1) switch ICMPv6 between two TG links
*02:02:31.332*The VPP PIDs are not equal!
*02:02:31.332*Test Setup VPP PIDs: {'10.30.54.206': 25207,
'10.30.54.205': 26542}
*02:02:31.332*Test Teardown VPP PIDs: None
*02:02:31.332*Tests.Vpp.Func.L2Bd.Eth2P-Dot1Ad-L2Bdbasemaclrn-Vlantrans22-Func
- TC07: DUT1 and DUT2 with L2BD and VLAN translate-2-2 with wrong
outer tag used (DUT1) switch ICMPv6 between two TG links
*02:02:31.332*The VPP PIDs are not equal!
*02:02:31.332*Test Setup VPP PIDs: {'10.30.54.206': 25207,
'10.30.54.205': 26542}
*02:02:31.332*Test Teardown VPP PIDs: None
*02:02:31.343*| FAIL |
*02:02:31.343*Setup failed:
*02:02:31.343*NoValidConnectionsError: [Errno None] Unable to
connect to port 22 on or 10.30.54.207
Could you, please, have a look on it?
Thanks,
Jan
*From:*csit-...@lists.fd.io
<mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io>[mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io]*On
Behalf Of*Thomas F Herbert
*Sent:*Tuesday, February 13, 2018 2:14 PM
*To:*csit-...@lists.fd.io <mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io>
*Subject:*Re: [csit-dev] t4-virl3 moved from testing back into
production
Yes,
Everything should work fine with the 1.4 image.
--Tom
On 02/13/2018 12:27 AM, Peter Mikus wrote:
Thank you Ed.
Peter Mikus
Engineer – Software
Cisco Systems Limited
-Original Message-
From:csit-...@lists.fd.io <mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io>
[mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Ed Kern (ejk)
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 12:06 AM
To:csit-...@lists.fd.io <mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io>
Cc: Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>
Subject: [csit-dev] FYI: t4-virl3 moved from testing back into
production
This is still with the ‘older’ centos image. Thomas said the newer one
isn’t quite ready yet.
So this is just an fyi if folks see something amiss in the next few
days with the virl jobs to let me know.
thanks,
Ed
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
NFV and Fast Data Planes
Networking Group Office of the CTO
*Red Hat*
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
NFV and Fast Data Planes
Networking Group Office of the CTO
*Red Hat*
Re: [vpp-dev] Failing verify jobs
I have verified that this is a VIRL problem but am not sure how to fix it. Please see my response on the csit list. On 12/30/2017 06:35 PM, Dave Wallace wrote: Hi Jon, Thanks for the report. I rebased this patch yesterday because there had been a couple of reports of CSIT job failures due to this VIRL failure. Given that most/all of the CSIT team is on PTO until 1/2/18, I don't expect that this will be addressed before Tuesday, but I'm sure that it will be addressed as soon as practicable when everyone is back. Happy New Year! -daw- On 12/30/2017 11:01 AM, Jon Loeliger wrote: Folks, So, I have a long-standing "DON'T MERGE"-ish patch that is a recurring rebase request to help identify failures of missing #include files in C API application biulds. It is: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/8189 It was recently rebased, and failed for an entirely different reason. That reason appears to be related to some VIRL server failure. Starting around 16:02:56 in the console log file https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/8806/console shows this: *16:02:56* ++ ssh -i priv_key -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -o BatchMode=yes -o LogLevel=errorjenkins-in@10.30.51.29 <mailto:jenkins-in@10.30.51.29> 'start-testcase -vv --quota 65 --copy double-ring-nested.xenial --release csit-ubuntu-16.04.1_2017-10-21_2.0 /tmp/vpp_18.01-rc0~540-gda58107~b8806_amd64.deb' /tmp/vpp-api-java_18.01-rc0~540-gda58107~b8806_amd64.deb /tmp/vpp-api-lua_18.01-rc0~540-gda58107~b8806_amd64.deb /tmp/vpp-api-python_18.01-rc0~540-gda58107~b8806_amd64.deb /tmp/vpp-dbg_18.01-rc0~540-gda58107~b8806_amd64.deb /tmp/vpp-dev_18.01-rc0~540-gda58107~b8806_amd64.deb /tmp/vpp-dpdk-dkms_17.11-vpp1_amd64.deb /tmp/vpp-lib_18.01-rc0~540-gda58107~b8806_amd64.deb /tmp/vpp-plugins_18.01-rc0~540-gda58107~b8806_amd64.deb apparently yielded this error: *16:02:58* VIRL simulation start failed on 10.30.51.29 I have no clue other than "connection wasn't established" as to why that might be. In fact I have no idea what is going on here. :-) Thanks, jdl ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] gerrit 9904 VIRL verification is failing
The problem is almost definitely in VIRL. I noticed it on the 26th while
load testing VIRL3 by doing rechecks of CSIT patches:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/r/8759
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/9890
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/9900
I think Ed Kern will need to look at this.
I noticed while it was failing nova list showed nothing. Then I noticed
that there was nothing listed on the other VIRL servers despite
rechecking patch 9904.
Today, I failed to launch a local simulation on virl3:
virl@t4-virl3:~/tfh/csit/resources/tools/disk-image-builder/centos$ !719
virl_std_client -u $VIRL_USER -p $VIRL_PASSWORD simengine-launch -f
listmaker/virl-listmaker-centos-7.3-1611.yaml
INFO 2017-12-31 16:37:48,788 virl.std.client Client.simengine_launch
called args=(mode 'rb' at 0x7f038b6ed5d0>,
None,
False,
None,
None,
None,
None,
None,
None) kargs={}
INFO 2017-12-31 16:37:48,788 virl.std.client simengine_launch POST
on URL "http://localhost:19399/simengine/rest/launch";
INFO 2017-12-31 16:37:48,966 virl.std.client simengine_launch
response 500 to POST on URL
"http://localhost:19399/simengine/rest/launch?file=virl-listmaker-centos-7.3-1611.yaml";
ERROR 2017-12-31 16:37:48,967 virl.std.client STD client call to
Client.simengine_launch received invalid response status 500 (Cisco
contact was not established. This may be temporary.)
Exception cause:
STD simengine-launch request received invalid response: 500 - Cisco
contact was not established. This may be temporary.
I grabbed the logs and saw this in the std.server.log
virl_std_client -u $VIRL_USER -p $VIRL_PASSWORD simengine-systemlogs >
logs.zip
I saw the following in std_server.log
vi std_server.log
quest: "GET /simengine/rest/events/session" user "tb4-virl"
ERROR 2017-12-31 16:23:18,788 PID=45336 virl.std.implementation
Simulation "session" not found.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/flask/app.py", line
1612, in full_dispatch_request
rv = self.dispatch_request()
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/flask/app.py", line
1598, in dispatch_request
return self.view_functions[rule.endpoint](**req.view_args)
File "", line 2, in simengine_events
File
"/var/jenkins/workspace/VIRL_CORE_build/test-virl-repo/virl/std/implementation.py",
line 330, in middleware
File "", line 2, in simengine_events
File
"/var/jenkins/workspace/VIRL_CORE_build/test-virl-repo/virl/common/utils.py",
line 94, in measurer
File
"/var/jenkins/workspace/VIRL_CORE_build/test-virl-repo/virl/std/implementation.py",
line 2177, in simengine_events
HttpException: Simulation "session" not found.
--Tom
On 12/27/2017 09:48 AM, Thomas F Herbert wrote:
On 12/27/2017 09:02 AM, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote:
Hi Nitin,
Hit the ‘reply’ button and post a review comment of:
recheck
that will poke Jenkins to redo the verification.
/neale
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of "Saxena,
Nitin"
Date: Wednesday, 27 December 2017 at 14:38
To: "Dave Barach (dbarach)","vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: [vpp-dev] gerrit 9904 VIRL verification is failing
Hi,
I sent a patch (https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9904/) for review in which "vpp-csit-verify-virl-master" job is failing.
Console logs (https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/8798/console.log.gz) shows following error.
call_home\nFlmClientException: Cisco contact was not established. This may be
temporary.\nPlease make sure the VIRL server is connected to the Internet and
capable of reaching the configured Cisco master.\nAlso make sure that the minion key
provided to you matches your minion ID and domain, and remains valid.\nCurrent
status is: Last successful contact was more than 7 days ago.\nLast call home check
result was: Call has timed out; failed to connect or minion key not accepted.\n"
I have also seen what looks like the same thing on VIRL3 which is
currently not in production. I reported it yesterday to the CSIT
mailing list.
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/csit-vpp-functional-master-ubuntu1604-virl/3290/
}
+ VIRL_SID[${index}]=
+ retval=1
+ '[' 1 -ne 0 ']'
+ echo 'VIRL simulation start failed on 10.30.51.29'
VIRL simulation start failed on 10.30.51.29
===
Seems like a temporary problem. What is the gerrit command such that Jenkins again start doing verification.
Thanks,
Nitin
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
___________
Re: [vpp-dev] gerrit 9904 VIRL verification is failing
On 12/27/2017 09:02 AM, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote:
Hi Nitin,
Hit the ‘reply’ button and post a review comment of:
recheck
that will poke Jenkins to redo the verification.
/neale
-Original Message-
From: on behalf of "Saxena, Nitin"
Date: Wednesday, 27 December 2017 at 14:38
To: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: [vpp-dev] gerrit 9904 VIRL verification is failing
Hi,
I sent a patch (https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/9904/) for review in which "vpp-csit-verify-virl-master" job is failing.
Console logs (https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/8798/console.log.gz) shows following error.
call_home\nFlmClientException: Cisco contact was not established. This may be
temporary.\nPlease make sure the VIRL server is connected to the Internet and
capable of reaching the configured Cisco master.\nAlso make sure that the minion key
provided to you matches your minion ID and domain, and remains valid.\nCurrent
status is: Last successful contact was more than 7 days ago.\nLast call home check
result was: Call has timed out; failed to connect or minion key not accepted.\n"
I have also seen what looks like the same thing on VIRL3 which is
currently not in production. I reported it yesterday to the CSIT mailing
list.
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/csit-vpp-functional-master-ubuntu1604-virl/3290/
}
+ VIRL_SID[${index}]=
+ retval=1
+ '[' 1 -ne 0 ']'
+ echo 'VIRL simulation start failed on 10.30.51.29'
VIRL simulation start failed on 10.30.51.29
===
Seems like a temporary problem. What is the gerrit command such that Jenkins again start doing verification.
Thanks,
Nitin
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
NFV and Fast Data Planes
Networking Group Office of the CTO
*Red Hat*
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Please install missing RPMs: \npackage python34 is not installed
What commit are you building? This has not been a problem for some time and is not a problem on stable/1710 or the top of tree current master. There was a dependency introduced by an earlier commit which was subsequently removed. --Tom On 12/14/2017 10:05 PM, wrote: Hi, everyone ?0?2 ?0?2I build vpp on centos 7.3, and had executed make install-dep. It is ok. but when i make build vpp . it print "Please install missing RPMs: \npackage python34 is not installed". Then i install python3.4 and?0?2 after installed the python is ok. make build vpp is still : "Please install missing RPMs: \npackage python34 is not installed", Why ? ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] New Option for fd.io mailing lists: groups.io
I have found the UI for moderation on Mailman a little difficult. Both systems require authentication via email to join. I would think that would reduce most bots/SPAM. So the advantage if any of Groups.io is that it has a better gui. Do we se have use for its wiki or calendar? I have found the moderation view of the mailman gui a little confusing and maybe this I think may be the best advantage of groups.io. At least from the standpoint of a somewhat light user of moderation. I think it would be transparent to participants. --Tom On 12/14/2017 10:45 AM, Ed Warnicke wrote: A new option has become available for handling mailing lists: groups.io <http://groups.io> As a community, we need to look at this option, provide feedback, and come to a decision as to whether or not to migrate. A critical part of that is having folks take a look, ask questions, and express opinions :) We have a sandbox example at https://groups.io/g/lfn you can look at And an example with active list and imported archive: https://lists.odpi.org/g/odpi-sig-bi Major benefits include searchability, better web interface, etc. The LF was kind enough to write a FAQ for us as we consider as a community whether to migrate or not: *FAQs* *Q: What are the key differences between Mailman and Groups.io?* ●Groups.io has a modern interface, robust user security model, and interactive, searchable archives ●Groups.io provides advanced features including muting threads and integrations with modern tools like GitHub, Slack, and Trello ●Groups.io also has optional extras like a shared calendar, polling, chat, a wiki, and more ●Groups.io uses a concept of subgroups, where members first join the project “group” (a master list), then they choose the specific “subgroup” lists they want to subscribe to *Q: How is the experience different for me as a list moderator or participant?* In many ways, it is very much the same. You will still find the main group at your existing URL and sub-groups equate to the more focused mailing lists based on the community’s needs. Here is an example of main group and sub-group URL patterns, and their respective emails: https://lists.fd.io/g/tsc https://lists.fd.io/g/discuss https:/lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev <http://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev> t...@lists.fd.io <mailto:t...@lists.fd.io> disc...@lists.fd.io <mailto:disc...@lists.fd.io> vpp-...@llists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-...@llists.fd.io> What is different is Groups.io’s simple but highly functional UI that will make the experience of moderating or participating in the community discussions more enjoyable. ___ csit-dev mailing list csit-...@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Fwd: :: Setting Mac address on Vlan interface
Omer,
I think you may be referring to 802.1ah otherwise known as PBB,
mac-in-mac or provider backbone bridges?
--Tom
On 12/01/2017 12:37 PM, prabh...@techtrueup.com wrote:
hi Neale,
we are not looking for any additional datapath lookup based on MAC here.
this is related to one of the feature that we are trying to translate
to VPP. where we need to handle and generate traffic with configure
destination and source MAC. we have tried multiple options and were
able to handle incoming traffic, but we were having issues sending
traffic with specific source MAC particularly with ECMP routes.
so i only see two ways either we support configurable MAC address on
vlan interface
or have some ability to configure which source MAC to use in the route
configuration
please let me know if you want to understand the feature in detail. we
can setup a short call for the same.
Regards,
Prabhjot
Quoting "Neale Ranns (nranns)" :
Hi Prabhjot,
I would say it is possible, but one would need to place the NIC in
promiscuous mode for an L3 interface, do maybe do MAC to interface
matching in the data-plane which would cost many cycles. Or an rx
would you still want to match to input interface based only on the
VLAN Tag.
I confess I don’t understand why you want such a feature, when the
VLAN tag identifies the sub-interface. Perhaps you could help me
understand.
Thanks,
neale
-Original Message-
From: "prabh...@techtrueup.com"
Date: Friday, 1 December 2017 at 13:30
To: Omer Majeed
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , "Neale Ranns
(nranns)"
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Fwd: :: Setting Mac address on Vlan interface
hi Neale,
we are expecting to be able to handle different MAC
addresses for
VLAN interfaces. This feature seems to be not available in VPP as of
now.
we also tried looking for possible work around, which were dead ends
as of now. Please let us know if we agree to this as something that
can be done for VPP, we can work on this and contribute if useful.
please share your inputs
Regards,
Prabhjot
Quoting Omer Majeed :
> Hi Neale,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
> A physical interface could have multiple Vlan interfaces and I
want traffic
> originating from Vlan interface to have user defined Mac
address rather
> than parent's Mac address.
>
> In Linux we have this privilege to associate Mac addresses to Vlan
> interfaces using ifconfig.
> In Linux, we use vconfig to create Vlan interface and then we
could
> leverage ifconfig to configure our own Mac address on the Vlan
interface.
>
> Could we have something similar in VPP?
>
> Best Regards,
> Omer
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Neale Ranns (nranns)
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Omer,
>>
>>
>>
>> You can set the MAC address of a ‘host’ interface when it is
created:
>>
>> create host-interface name [hw-addr ]
>>
>>
>>
>> you can also change it after creation:
>>
>> set interface mac address
>>
>>
>>
>> but you cannot set the MAC address of a VLAN interface. A VLAN
interface
>> will always have the same MAC address as its parent/physical
interface.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Neale
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: * on behalf of Omer Majeed <
>> omer.maj...@rwth-aachen.de>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, 29 November 2017 at 11:45
>> *To: *"vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
>> *Subject: *[vpp-dev] Fwd: :: Setting Mac address on Vlan
interface
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to form an ecmp between Vlan interfaces. Traffic
coming with
>> IP 1.1.1.5 would go through Vlan interfaces host-tap0.1 and
host-tap1.1
>> forming ecmp.
>>
>>
>>
>> ip route add 1.1.1.5/32 table 3 via 1.1.1.5 host-tap0.1
>> ip route add 1.1.1.5/32 table 3 via 1.1.1.5 host-tap1.1
>>
>>
>> set ip arp host-tap0.1 1.1.1.5 02:00:00:00:00:02
>>
>> set ip arp host-tap1.1 1.1.1.5 02:00:00:00:00:02
>>
>>
>>
>> ip route add 1.1.1.5/32 table 5 via 1.1.1.5 host-tap2.1
>>
>> ip route add 1.1.1.5/32 table 5 via 1.1.1.5 host-tap3.1
>>
>>
>>
>> set ip arp host-tap2.1 1.1.1.5 02:00:00:00:00:01
>>
>> set ip arp host-tap3.1 1.1.1.5 02:00:00:00:00:01
>>
>>
>>
>> Howeve
Re: [vpp-dev] Jenkins jobs not starting from a "clean" state?
; https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- Marco V SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg -- Marco V SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] And Boost Log too?
boost and boost-devel should suffice. On 11/08/2017 03:30 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote: On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Neale Ranns (nranns) <mailto:nra...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Jon, It doesn’t need it. I must have left that in by mistake. I’ll take it out. Awesome. Thanks! jdl ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Networking Group Office of the CTO *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] debuginfo rpms missing from nexus yum repos.
Hi, I noticed while working on csit that vpp debuginfo rpms are "missing" from Nexus Centos repo and have been since late September. The newest ones date back to September. Does anybody know why? --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of the CTO *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Gerrit is down
gerrit is back up. On 10/14/2017 08:34 AM, Thomas F Herbert wrote: Has anyone noticed that gerrit has been down for about 30 minutes so far this morning? -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] Gerrit is down
Has anyone noticed that gerrit has been down for about 30 minutes so far this morning? -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] [centos-dev][NFV SIG] VPP 17.10 rc1 available in Centos for testing.
Centos developers, VPP version 17.10 is available in Centos CBS for testing, This is a build of 17.10-rc1. https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=20183 For more information about VPP and fd.io, https://wiki.fd.io/view/Main_Page https://fd.io/ --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] Downstream builds for Centos
VPPers: We have had some progress during the last week with builds in Centos: This is a build of 1710-rc0. https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=20183 As soon as The final upstream 1710 release is tagged, I will push this to "release" tag and try to get it into a Centos yum repo. Stay tuned. --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Process question for gerrit
On 10/12/2017 11:33 AM, Dave Wallace wrote: Hi Tom, IMHO, it would be best for developers to cherry-pick bug fixes into master that they have committed to stable/* branches. Yes. Thanks. I agree as does Florin. Done for both patches. Thanks, -daw- On 10/12/2017 10:11 AM, Thomas F Herbert wrote: Process question: Some bug fixes were merged directly into vpp-stable/1710 that should also be cherry-picked into master. Should we developers cherry-pick our own gerrits to master or should the maintainers do this? Either way is OK with me. --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 17.10 RC2
Florin, OK. That makes sense. I will cherry-pick two patches that were merged in stable/1710 --Tom On 10/12/2017 10:46 AM, Florin Coras wrote: Hi Tom, I’d appreciate it if patch owners would cherry-pick the patches. It might be the case that some fixes may not need to be cherry picked to master and in other cases, when master and stable run out of sync, the cherry-picks might actually require more work. Regards, Florin On Oct 12, 2017, at 7:13 AM, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 10/11/2017 06:14 PM, Florin Coras wrote: Folks, 17.10 RC2 tag has been laid. Nonetheless, our patching process continues to remain the same until formal release [1], i.e., fixes first to stable/1710 and then cherry-pick to master. Florin, should us submitters cherry-pick our own bug-fix patches to master or should we wait for you do them all? Regards, Florin [1] https://wiki.fd.io/view/Projects/vpp/Release_Plans/Release_Plan_17.10 ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 17.10 RC2
On 10/11/2017 06:14 PM, Florin Coras wrote: Folks, 17.10 RC2 tag has been laid. Nonetheless, our patching process continues to remain the same until formal release [1], i.e., fixes first to stable/1710 and then cherry-pick to master. Florin, should us submitters cherry-pick our own bug-fix patches to master or should we wait for you do them all? Regards, Florin [1] https://wiki.fd.io/view/Projects/vpp/Release_Plans/Release_Plan_17.10 ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] Process question for gerrit
Process question: Some bug fixes were merged directly into vpp-stable/1710 that should also be cherry-picked into master. Should we developers cherry-pick our own gerrits to master or should the maintainers do this? Either way is OK with me. --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Process for submitting patches to stable/1710
OK, Thanks! I added Damjan to review. --Tom On 10/10/2017 05:17 PM, Florin Coras wrote: Hi Tom, As long as the patches have a jira ticket, procedurally all is fine with me. However, since we’re so close to release, I’d like Damjan, since he’s the build infra manager, to vet the changes. Regards, Florin On Oct 10, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote: Dave, Florin, I have two patches in gerrit for stable/1710, both with JIRAs. Is there a chance that these can make it into 1710-rc2? They both fix problems that break rpm builds but add no additional features. I want to confirm I am following the correct procedure. One was originally submitted to master and rebased to stable/1710 and the other one was submitted directly to stable/1710. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/8721 https://gerrit.fd.io/r/8720 https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1015 https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1014 --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] Process for submitting patches to stable/1710
Dave, Florin, I have two patches in gerrit for stable/1710, both with JIRAs. Is there a chance that these can make it into 1710-rc2? They both fix problems that break rpm builds but add no additional features. I want to confirm I am following the correct procedure. One was originally submitted to master and rebased to stable/1710 and the other one was submitted directly to stable/1710. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/8721 https://gerrit.fd.io/r/8720 https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1015 https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1014 --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Dependency on libsubunit ? (and failing to run tests)
On 10/10/2017 10:46 AM, Marco Varlese wrote: Hi Klement, Yes, once check-devel is in place, then we can remove -lsubunit from test/ext/Makefile. Things would still work (at least on openSUSE). I submitted a patch for review: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8736 Subunit is a prerequisite for check version 0.10 which is used in Fedora. However, I don't know if check version 0.10 actually needs to be bound with subunit or whether this is just an RPM dependency. Cheers, Marco On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 14:03 +, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: Hi Marco, this issue is already being investigated by Tom Herbert. Strange thing is that check requires subunit. I wonder if it works if you install check only. Could you try removing -lsubunit from test/ext/Makefile? Thanks, Klement Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-10-10 16:00:00) Hi all, As of last week I could happily run tests (e.g. make test) on my distribution (openSUSE). When I tried again today - with latest master - I couldn't anymore: make[2]: Entering directory '/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/test/ext' cc -o /home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/build-root/vapi_test/vapi_c_test -std=gnu99 -g -Wall -pthread -I/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/src -I/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/build- root/install-vpp-native//vpp/include -I/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/build- root/vapi_test/ vapi_c_test.c -L/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/build-root/build- vpp- native/vpp/.libs/ -L/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/build-root/build-vpp- native/vpp/vpp- api/vapi/.libs/ -lvppinfra -lvlibmemoryclient -lsvm -lpthread -lcheck -lsubunit -lrt -lm -lvapiclient /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/7/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: cannot find -lsubunit collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status I tried to find the newly introduced dependency on libsubunit but wasn't successful. Can anybody shed some light? Separate, we do not have that package on our distro... Cheers, Marco ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Dependency on libsubunit ? (and failing to run tests)
On 10/10/2017 10:03 AM, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: Hi Marco, this issue is already being investigated by Tom Herbert. Strange thing is that check requires subunit. I wonder if it works if you install check only. Could you try removing -lsubunit from test/ext/Makefile? Check version 0.10 requires subunit. The older Check version 0.9 does not. Check version 0.10 is used in Fedora 25+ Check version 0.9 is used in Centos 7.4. I am not sure about SUSE? I am testing a patch for cherry picking into stable/1710 now that straightens this out. I will add you (Marco) to the review. Thanks, Klement Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-10-10 16:00:00) Hi all, As of last week I could happily run tests (e.g. make test) on my distribution (openSUSE). When I tried again today - with latest master - I couldn't anymore: make[2]: Entering directory '/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/test/ext' cc -o /home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/build-root/vapi_test/vapi_c_test -std=gnu99 -g -Wall -pthread -I/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/src -I/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/build- root/install-vpp-native//vpp/include -I/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/build- root/vapi_test/ vapi_c_test.c -L/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/build-root/build-vpp- native/vpp/.libs/ -L/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/build-root/build-vpp-native/vpp/vpp- api/vapi/.libs/ -lvppinfra -lvlibmemoryclient -lsvm -lpthread -lcheck -lsubunit -lrt -lm -lvapiclient /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/7/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: cannot find -lsubunit collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status I tried to find the newly introduced dependency on libsubunit but wasn't successful. Can anybody shed some light? Separate, we do not have that package on our distro... Cheers, Marco ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] [releng] Proposal to redirect #opendaylight-releng to #lf-releng
+ci-...@fd.io This probably should also go to ci-man which is roubhly the equivalent of releng in opnfv. --TFH On 10/03/2017 02:12 PM, Thanh Ha wrote: On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Thanh Ha mailto:thanh...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: Hi Everyone, We'd like to pitch an idea to have #opendaylight-releng irc channel redirect to a new #lf-releng channel. Something that's occurred to us is that many of the networking at LF projects have their own separate releng channels in which folks typically ask JJB related questions. Each of these channels are typically moderately active. Something we've been thinking about is the idea of merging all these releng channels into #lf-releng which we're hoping can combine the communities JJB experts so that JJB and other releng related questions can be more broadly asked. Thoughts? Regards, Thanh Hi Everyone, For those that don't know me. I am one of the release engineers working on the OpenDaylight project. I've added the fd.io <http://fd.io>, opnfv, and onap communities to this list to get feedback on the idea proposed above. Let me know if there's other mailing lists in the respective projects we should be cc'ing to include in the discussions. I'd like to hear from the fd.io <http://fd.io>, opnfv, and onap for their thoughts on the proposal to create a single lf-releng channel on IRC and have all the respective releng channels redirect to it. Since our respective releng projects use similar technologies like JJB, Jenkins, etc... it might be a benefit to pool together our expertise so that it is easier to ask questions to the broader community when we need help with things like JJB, Gerrit, etc... You can follow the discussion thread so far from the ODL community discussed here: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/dev/2017-September/004066.html Regards, Thanh ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Problem with new c api patch commit 8f2a4ea merged on September 19
On 09/25/2017 05:02 AM, Marco Varlese wrote: Thanks for the thorough explanation Klement!Based on that, I think (2) is still the better option for the current situation... Tom, how would that sound to you? "Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" 09/25/17 10:40 AM >>> Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-09-25 10:26:50) Hi Klement, "Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" 09/25/17 9:33 AM >>> At the time of creating this patch, epel was part of Makefile and python34 was installed as dependency from that repo. (see https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6983/53/Makefile) At later time, the epel stuff disappeared and with it also the possibility to add python34 as a centos dependency - commit bd8e242024fcc2daffa77bdd6e2da1296ace5c69. I remember pointing this out in discussion with Neale, but I didn't get a chance to test whether centos works or not before it was merged. That's OK. You would have had to test with a system without EPEL Repo enabled to discover this problem. I should have paid closer attention when this patch was first discussed in May. Please add me as a reviewer for patches that have implications for RPM packaging and requirements. I think it would be nice though to update other scripts too so to have one single python version used across the board. Currently, to build VPP on our distribution I need to require both python and python3 packages since some python scripts use one rather than the other. Aligning python versions would make downstream consumption better I believe. Is this something which will/could be done? See below. As for the solution, I can think of 3 options: 1.) require python3 (which has been around for some ~9 years now) 2.) disable generation of the C (and C++) API if python3 is not detected I think this would be a fair compromise for distros not supporting (yet) python3. However, I am not sure how this would result in the VPP CI... wouldn't this break all tests running over those API? Tests are python2.7 because scapy wasn't python3 capable when we designed the test framework. These are language bindings, not different API calls. Only test_vapi, which tests that the language bindings of different types (simple request, dump, event, etc.) work would have to be disabled. I think this is a good interim work-around until the distros have Python3. I can submit another patch to allow this the inclusion would be enabled as a default but could be disabled only in downstream builds in RHEL and Centos 7. When will we have tests in CSIT that use the C/C++ APIs in 17.10? Neale, are we planning to cherry-pick this patch into 17.10? Do we have yet tests in CSIT that use the C/C++ APIs in 17.10? 3.) convert the script to python2.7 (which is in the opposite direction of where we would want to go wrt python version) Thanks, Klement Cheers, Marco Quoting Thomas F Herbert (2017-09-23 15:55:10) All: Commit 8f2a4ea, Gerrit, [1]https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6983/ "Add new C API" introduces a dependency on Python 3 and breaks downstream builds for Centos. Unfortunately, neither RHEL nor Centos currently support Python 3. Most VPPers are probably building with EPEL repo so this problem didn't show up until now but actually there is no dependency on EPEL in the Makefile or spec file. If anybody can suggest a solution short of pushing Python 3 into the downstream repos, I am open to suggestions. --Tom -- Thomas F Herbert NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology Red Hat References Visible links 1. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6983/ ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] Problem with new c api patch commit 8f2a4ea merged on September 19
All: Commit 8f2a4ea, Gerrit, https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6983/ "Add new C API" introduces a dependency on Python 3 and breaks downstream builds for Centos. Unfortunately, neither RHEL nor Centos currently support Python 3. Most VPPers are probably building with EPEL repo so this problem didn't show up until now but actually there is no dependency on EPEL in the Makefile or spec file. If anybody can suggest a solution short of pushing Python 3 into the downstream repos, I am open to suggestions. --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] CentOS 7.4
After update you need reboot to install new kernel and make sure kernel headers are consistent with new kernel. I think the update "should" update all installed RPMs including those that were previously installed with make install-dep. nasm for Centos is updated outside of yum because nasm 2.12+ is still not available in downstream Centos distro. On 09/19/2017 04:03 PM, Burt Silverman wrote: Problem solved after 1)rebooting, 2) cd ~/vpp; rm -rf *; git checkout . 3) make install-dep; make bootstrap; make build-release. Possibly it was just the reboot and make install-dep, I am not sure, but I saw nasm getting updated at that point. Thanks, Tom, for hints. Burt On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Burt Silverman <mailto:bur...@gmail.com>> wrote: I updated my CentOS using "yum update" and that leaves me with CentOS 7.4. So I get those fPIC errors that others have reported on non CentOS systems but that have glibc 2.17. Are others seeing the same thing? It looks to me that the official builds under CentOS are being done WITHOUT "yum update". Thanks. Burt -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8236/
On 08/30/2017 01:57 PM, Gabriel Ganne wrote:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8260/
It adds bc to the dependency list, but also replaces a $(shell $(echo
…)) by $(shell `echo …`)
They should be the same, but it seems to change the way the Makefile
variables are interpreted.
The problem I saw was on Fedora and Centos both of which have bc. The
problem it needs a double $
to escape the "$()" from make because it "thinks" it is a reference
to a variable.
commit 14afc64629e9b35a2e5c5941232236a78c2ecd75
Author: Thomas F Herbert
Date: Wed Aug 30 10:13:51 2017 -0400
Fix shell error.
Change-Id: I06af51eef20c2191199613f951f569ef1727b9c4
Signed-off-by: Thomas F Herbert
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 1548f36..ef92e2f 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ ifeq ($(OS_ID)-$(OS_VERSION_ID),fedora-25)
RPM_DEPENDS += python-devel
RPM_DEPENDS += python2-virtualenv
RPM_DEPENDS_GROUPS = 'C Development Tools and Libraries'
-else ifeq ($(shell if [ $(echo "$(OS_VERSION_ID) > 25" | bc) -eq 1 ] ;
then echo "y" ; fi),"y")
+else ifeq ($(shell if [ $$(echo "$(OS_VERSION_ID) > 25" | bc) -eq 1 ] ;
then echo "y" ; fi),"y")
RPM_DEPENDS += python2-devel
RPM_DEPENDS += python2-virtualenv
RPM_DEPENDS_GROUPS = 'C Development Tools and Libraries'
I tested on rhel 7, Ubuntu 16.04, and debian 8.
Best regards,
--
Gabriel Ganne
*From:*Dave Wallace [mailto:dwallac...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* mercredi 30 août 2017 16:27
*To:* Burt Silverman ; Gabriel Ganne
*Cc:* Thomas F Herbert ; vpp-dev
*Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8236/
I agree.
@Gabriel, please push a patch which adds bc to DEB_DEPENDS in
vpp/Makefile.
Thanks,
-daw-
On 08/30/2017 09:14 AM, Burt Silverman wrote:
To me, it doesn't seem to be a crime to add bc to the
dependencies. I guess another approach would be to remove the dot
in 16dot04 and then just use shell arithmetic. The release numbers
are always in the same format, 2 digits DOT 2 digits, so I would
think that should work.
Burt
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:47 AM, Gabriel Ganne
mailto:gabriel.ga...@enea.com>> wrote:
Hi,
This probably is be because you don't have bc.
It is not in the dependency list. I'm so used to having it
around that I did not think to check.
Sorry.
If so, the best thing probably is to revert and not to
increase the dependency list just to silence a warning.
Regards,
--
Gabriel Ganne
*From:*Dave Wallace mailto:dwallac...@gmail.com>>
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 30, 2017 6:25:32 AM
*To:* Thomas F Herbert; Gabriel Ganne
*Cc:* vpp-dev
*Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8236/
<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1dn3xX-0006Hd-50&i=57e1b682&c=cStJh6yQU2F9FWBIKNcsjRgTf-ntcQfeHTWOgVHSer9pSh1n2Ke77HoWikhOjcSWh0z-O2rHVl18yF2FOHhjhruUhq8VyojK4u6e0BbsFIHZleaRifwRLCWsosaGdVw__FJqiQlIB_Gvaa1w9Jm_gQAlPYBetc4L-9HozLkobTyK5775Sj6qZDN6ijVpzsIcF1ulKmuWUEnw9sNtRAXHMyDXYthGBQFz_EFyNSgCszs>
Tom,
What OS are you running?
Thanks,
-daw-
On 08/29/2017 07:58 PM, Thomas F Herbert wrote:
This patch creates may have fixed one problem with Ubuntu
16.04 but created another:
$ make
/bin/sh: line 0: [: -eq: unary operator expected
...
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
NFV and Fast Data Planes
Office of Technology
*Red Hat*
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1dmuZP-0007YU-5v&i=57e1b682&c=Qsrdfe_DPl_SvvWzv--VtKCBJOKVTEg4VL0ZnkHG2v411y213_M9DM_3rjAI_f7X2ifYtM6xQxMwYWfBDcZTqZxJaNy5yHnZcs5MFE_YJQCWz0i2q6fT4KpnC8m_c_MsVfHOcIcUpBQ7dUboUbtyy5Ey7roG_YlGZSbaOR7rmgDeloqmgdxJ1d-Duo6FX-6ARriIWYlW9895XudmB85pM0kVgfReq85yx9Z-4QG_addHGYW74uqlKVoVuMF6O6ni>
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
<https://url10.mailanyone.net/v1/?m=1dn3xX-0006Hd-50&i=57e1b682&c=EqcMBcwLbPIpILbjmEVtzuPv1tv4iapVkLyJrlkzz0UhLpP0wGZLZTNDpeO9UJwtlk5EUSaYSRG16iZ7f2x6tCkRecTwkKo0B_NuE_yrCrMiUQkJOqx1KujPdKYakBj_Atb8EfOWXBZKXVyuTR9G29RBJTGbbvTxPxqont1wC6CbeyJKvJl38VYK9MYuVFMgA_-dnpOGR8Z9eXz6SHF8BJiilA1Y4WPLHciUK_1mBxXF3894rogQEQxZSVdIRm8q>
--
*Thomas F Herbert
[vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8236/
This patch creates may have fixed one problem with Ubuntu 16.04 but created another: $ make /bin/sh: line 0: [: -eq: unary operator expected ... -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Please review patch 8117 and 8215
On 08/25/2017 01:34 PM, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote: Tom, let me know when they are verified and I will merge them…. Damjan, Thanks! Both patches are now verified. Thanks, Damjan On 25 Aug 2017, at 18:16, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote: Ignore previous message for now. I have to re-base the patch. On 08/25/2017 11:53 AM, Thomas F Herbert wrote: All, Could someone please review the patch below? Probably the gerrit emails are buried in various inboxes. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8117/ Thanks, --TFH -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Please review patch 8117
Ignore previous message for now. I have to re-base the patch. On 08/25/2017 11:53 AM, Thomas F Herbert wrote: All, Could someone please review the patch below? Probably the gerrit emails are buried in various inboxes. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8117/ Thanks, --TFH -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] Please review patch 8117
All, Could someone please review the patch below? Probably the gerrit emails are buried in various inboxes. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8117/ Thanks, --TFH -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] MLX3
All, Billy and I are purchasing new server(s) and it is currently being specified with Mellanox ConnectX-3. I see it is supported but how much experience do we have with this card? Do we have to use OFED etc. for perf tuning or is that only for the ConnextX-4 and 5? Thanks --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] VPP compile error building vpp ipsec on Fed 26
On 08/14/2017 03:39 AM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: Hi Tom, Some APIs currently used in VPP have been deprecated in OpenSSL 1.1, it would require some rework . It seems there is already a Jira ticket for it VPP-569 <https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-569> Thanks. I updated JIRA ticket with info below. Thanks, Sergio On 13/08/2017 22:45, Thomas F Herbert wrote: I am getting a compile error when building on Fedora 26. I am building master commit 3f6ff19a30e9fbe5befb4cc3521d1812e5612197 With openssl-devel-1.1.0f-7.fc26.x86_64 installed. CC vnet/ipsec/ipsec.lo In file included from /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/ipsec.c:25:0: /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h:63:18: error: field ‘encrypt_ctx’ has incomplete type EVP_CIPHER_CTX encrypt_ctx; ^~~ /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h:65:18: error: field ‘decrypt_ctx’ has incomplete type EVP_CIPHER_CTX decrypt_ctx; ^~~ /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h:67:12: error: field ‘hmac_ctx’ has incomplete type HMAC_CTX hmac_ctx; ^~~~ /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h: In function ‘esp_init’: /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h:274:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘HMAC_CTX_init’; did you mean ‘HMAC_CTX_new’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] HMAC_CTX_init (&(em->per_thread_data[thread_id].hmac_ctx)); ^ HMAC_CTX_new /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h: In function ‘hmac_calc’: /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h:301:3: error: ‘HMAC_Init’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] HMAC_Init (ctx, key, key_len, md); ^ In file included from /usr/include/openssl/opensslconf.h:42:0, from /usr/include/openssl/bn.h:31, from /usr/include/openssl/asn1.h:24, from /usr/include/openssl/objects.h:916, from /usr/include/openssl/evp.h:27, from /usr/include/openssl/hmac.h:15, from /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h:18, from /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/ipsec.c:25: /usr/include/openssl/hmac.h:28:1: note: declared here DEPRECATEDIN_1_1_0(__owur int HMAC_Init(HMAC_CTX *ctx, const void *key, int len, ^ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[6]: *** [Makefile:6098: vnet/ipsec/ipsec.lo] Error 1 make[6]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[6]: Leaving directory '/home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-root/build-vpp-native/vpp' make[5]: *** [Makefile:6979: all-recursive] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory '/home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-root/build-vpp-native/vpp' make[4]: *** [Makefile:3562: all] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory '/home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-root/build-vpp-native/vpp' make[3]: *** [Makefile:697: vpp-build] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-root' make[2]: *** [Makefile:933: install-packages] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-root' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kz3qOs (%build) ... -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] VPP compile error building vpp ipsec on Fed 26
I am getting a compile error when building on Fedora 26. I am building master commit 3f6ff19a30e9fbe5befb4cc3521d1812e5612197 With openssl-devel-1.1.0f-7.fc26.x86_64 installed. CC vnet/ipsec/ipsec.lo In file included from /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/ipsec.c:25:0: /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h:63:18: error: field ‘encrypt_ctx’ has incomplete type EVP_CIPHER_CTX encrypt_ctx; ^~~ /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h:65:18: error: field ‘decrypt_ctx’ has incomplete type EVP_CIPHER_CTX decrypt_ctx; ^~~ /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h:67:12: error: field ‘hmac_ctx’ has incomplete type HMAC_CTX hmac_ctx; ^~~~ /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h: In function ‘esp_init’: /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h:274:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘HMAC_CTX_init’; did you mean ‘HMAC_CTX_new’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] HMAC_CTX_init (&(em->per_thread_data[thread_id].hmac_ctx)); ^ HMAC_CTX_new /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h: In function ‘hmac_calc’: /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h:301:3: error: ‘HMAC_Init’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] HMAC_Init (ctx, key, key_len, md); ^ In file included from /usr/include/openssl/opensslconf.h:42:0, from /usr/include/openssl/bn.h:31, from /usr/include/openssl/asn1.h:24, from /usr/include/openssl/objects.h:916, from /usr/include/openssl/evp.h:27, from /usr/include/openssl/hmac.h:15, from /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/esp.h:18, from /home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-data/../src/vnet/ipsec/ipsec.c:25: /usr/include/openssl/hmac.h:28:1: note: declared here DEPRECATEDIN_1_1_0(__owur int HMAC_Init(HMAC_CTX *ctx, const void *key, int len, ^ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[6]: *** [Makefile:6098: vnet/ipsec/ipsec.lo] Error 1 make[6]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[6]: Leaving directory '/home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-root/build-vpp-native/vpp' make[5]: *** [Makefile:6979: all-recursive] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory '/home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-root/build-vpp-native/vpp' make[4]: *** [Makefile:3562: all] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory '/home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-root/build-vpp-native/vpp' make[3]: *** [Makefile:697: vpp-build] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-root' make[2]: *** [Makefile:933: install-packages] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/therbert/fd.io/vpp/extras/rpm/vpp-17.10/build-root' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.kz3qOs (%build) ... -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7856/ Review gerrit please
I saw it. Thanks, --Tom On 08/08/2017 11:29 AM, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote: Merged. Thanks, neale *From: * on behalf of Thomas F Herbert *Date: *Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 16:05 *To: *vpp-dev *Subject: *[vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7856/ Review gerrit please All: Could someone please review this patch? https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7856/ I have some additional dependent patches on this patch to submit. --TFH -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] node.js
Hi, I am doing the accounting on required packages for downstream builds. Does anyone know why epel-rpm-macros are included in our dependencies. This RPM provides an rpm macro which overrides another macro that defines the arch's on which node.js runs? What is the history as to this being in our dependencies: Makefile line 93 node.js is server side javascript. I don't see any instance or know of any reason why we need node.js? Am I missing something? --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7856/ Review gerrit please
All: Could someone please review this patch? https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7856/ I have some additional dependent patches on this patch to submit. --TFH -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 908 and nasm revision
On 07/25/2017 06:43 AM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: Hey Tom, It wasn't so much about having a new nasm version but when we already have a newer version installed in the system, the build fails because we do not have the specific 2.12 version. Maybe a simple workaround would be to have nasm in a fedora specific _DEPENDS variable and keep the fixed version for RHEL/CENTOS? Yes, since Fedora has 2.12 downstream, I will do that in the next patch series which I am working on now. Thanks, Sergio On 24/07/2017 16:08, Thomas F Herbert wrote: Sergio, I updated JIRA 908, https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-908 Could you please send me the new required revision of nasm? --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] VPP 908 and nasm revision
Sergio, I updated JIRA 908, https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-908 Could you please send me the new required revision of nasm? --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* NFV and Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Nexus server seems to be down: https://nexus.fd.io
It is back up now.
On 06/25/2017 02:36 PM, Ed Warnicke wrote:
What symptoms are you seeing... my normal spot checks show it up, but
it may be down more subtly than they would detect.
http was hanging. It lasted an hour or more.
Ed
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote:
The nexus server seems to be down for about 40 minutes now.
Has anyone else noticed this?
--TFH
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
Fast Data Planes
Office of Technology
*Red Hat*
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
<https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev>
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
Fast Data Planes
Office of Technology
*Red Hat*
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] Nexus server seems to be down: https://nexus.fd.io
The nexus server seems to be down for about 40 minutes now. Has anyone else noticed this? --TFH -- *Thomas F Herbert* Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] CI Tests Failing
tyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43) > 19:48:45at > hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:98) > 19:48:45at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:405) > 19:48:45 Build step 'Execute a set of scripts' marked build as failure > > > > ___ > vpp-dev mailing list > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev <https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev> ___ csit-dev mailing list csit-...@lists.fd.io <mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev <https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev> -- *Thomas F Herbert* Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-verify-master-centos7 failure
st-docs-verify-master/1818 -- To view, visithttps://gerrit.fd.io/r/6672 To unsubscribe, visithttps://gerrit.fd.io/r/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: Idbc10e9fab3b4e64feba3fa2490a11bcbc75daca Gerrit-PatchSet: 5 Gerrit-Project: vpp Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: shrinivasan ganapathy Gerrit-Reviewer: Dave Wallace Gerrit-Reviewer: Ed Kern Gerrit-Reviewer: Florin Coras Gerrit-Reviewer: Keith Burns Gerrit-Reviewer:fd.io <http://fd.io/> JJB Gerrit-HasComments: No ___ csit-dev mailing list csit-...@lists.fd.io <mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/csit-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Question: make realclean
On 05/08/2017 10:11 AM, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote: On 3 May 2017, at 17:20, Jon Loeliger <mailto:j...@netgate.com>> wrote: Hey VPP Builders, Do you ever use "cd build-root; make distclean"? Does it look sort of like this: jdl $ cd build-root/ jdl $ make distclean rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/build-*/ rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/build-tool-* rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/install-* rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/images-* rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/tools rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/*.deb rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/*.rpm rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/*.changes rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/python if [ -e /usr/bin/dh ];then (cd /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/deb/;debian/rules clean); fi rm -f /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/deb/debian/*.install rm -f /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/deb/debian/changelog Remember back in commit c06eeb0e3c9c1a9fa8f913e2d785b03220bfdabd Author: Damjan Marion mailto:damar...@cisco.com>> Date: Tue Apr 18 15:26:39 2017 +0200 Fix "make dist" to include version number, docouple it from rpm packaging Change-Id: If2f9976d668089026c97b897cf449bff09050631 Signed-off-by: Damjan Marion <mailto:damar...@cisco.com>> when we moved the RPM building pieces out of build-root/rpm and placed them under extras/rpm instead? Should we have also modified the distclean make target to rm the rpms out of extras/rpm too? Or was that an intentional change as well? Makes sense to do that from top level makefile, i.e. run "git clean -fdX” but I would prefer that build-root/Makefile only takes care for build-root/. +1 ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Question: make realclean
On 05/03/2017 03:22 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote: On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 05/03/2017 12:23 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote: Naturally, I meant "make distclean" on the Subject: line. :-) distclean removes the tarball created by the "make dist" target. OK, but, so? I think I missed your point. My point was that the "make distclean" is trying to remove RPM packages from a location that no longer holds them. And subsequently, it does not remove them from the directory that *does* hold them. Sorry, I missread. I thought you were talking about the top level Makefile wipedist target. The distclean in build-root/Makefile looks obsolete. It is I think left over before the most recent refactor of the build system. Was that somehow intentional? It looks broken to me. jdl -- *Thomas F Herbert* Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Question: make realclean
On 05/03/2017 12:23 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote: Naturally, I meant "make distclean" on the Subject: line. :-) distclean removes the tarball created by the "make dist" target. On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Jon Loeliger <mailto:j...@netgate.com>> wrote: Hey VPP Builders, Do you ever use "cd build-root; make distclean"? Does it look sort of like this: ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin for VPP
have to be quite far from MagLev's
design, and probably less efficient.
- Pierre
Le 25 avr. 2017 à 05:11, Zhou, Danny mailto:danny.z...@intel.com>> a écrit :
Share my two cents as well:
Firstly, introducing GRE or whatever other tunneling protocols
to LB introduces performance overhead (for encap and decap) to
both the load balancer as well as the network service.
Secondly, other mechanism on the network service node not only
needs to decap the GRE but also needs to perform a DNAT
operation in order to change the destination IP of the
original frame from LB’s IP to the service entity’s IP, which
introduces the complexity to the network service.
Existing well-known load balancers such as Netfilter or Nginx
do not adopt this tunneling approach, they just simply do a
service node selection followed by a NAT operation.
-Danny
*From:*vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io
<mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io>[mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io]*On
Behalf Of*Ni, Hongjun
*Sent:*Tuesday, April 25, 2017 11:05 AM
*To:*Ed Warnicke mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>>
*Cc:*Li, Johnson mailto:johnson...@intel.com>>;vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
*Subject:*Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin
for VPP
Hi Ed,
Thanks for your prompt response.
This item is required to handle legacy AS, because some legacy
AS does not want to change their underlay forwarding
infrastructure.
Besides, some AS IPs are private and invisible outside the AS
cluster domain, and not allowed to expose to external network.
Thanks,
Hongjun
*From:*Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagb...@gmail.com]
*Sent:*Tuesday, April 25, 2017 10:44 AM
*To:*Ni, Hongjun mailto:hongjun...@intel.com>>
*Cc:*vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>; Li,
Johnson mailto:johnson...@intel.com>>
*Subject:*Re: [vpp-dev] Requirement on Load Balancer plugin
for VPP
Hongjun,
I can see this point of view, but it radically reduces the
scalability of the whole system.
Wouldn't it just make sense to run vpp or some other mechanism
to decap the GRE on whatever is running the other AS and feed
whatever we are
load balancing to? Forcing back traffic through the central
load balancer radically reduces scalability (which is why
Maglev, which inspired what we are doing here, doesn't do it
that way either).
Ed
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Ni, Hongjun
mailto:hongjun...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hey,
Currently, traffic received for a given VIP (or VIP
prefix) is tunneled using GRE towards
the different ASs in a way that (tries to) ensure that a
given session will
always be tunneled to the same AS.
But in real environment, many Application Servers do not
support GRE feature.
So we raise a requirement for LB in VPP:
(1). When received traffic for a VIP, the LB need to do
load balance, then do DNAT to change traffic’s destination
IP from VIP to AS’s IP.
(2). When returned traffic from AS, the LB will do SNAT
first to change traffic’s source IP from AS’s IP to VIP,
then go through load balance sessions, and then sent to
clients.
Any comments about this requirement are welcome.
Thanks a lot,
Hongjun
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
Fast Data Planes
Office of Technology
*Red Hat*
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Build failure with latest VPP
vpp/app/version.h: No such >> file or directory >> [ 415s] #include >> [ 415s] ^ >> [ 415s] compilation terminated. >> [ 415s] make[4]: *** [Makefile:5900: vpp/app/bin_vpp-version.o] Error 1 >> [ 415s] mv -f vpp/app/.deps/bin_vpp-vpe_cli.Tpo vpp/app/.deps/bin_vpp- >> vpe_cli.Po >> [ 416s] mv -f vpp-api/pneum/.deps/libpneum_la-pneum.Tpo vpp- >> api/pneum/.deps/libpneum_la-pneum.Plo >> [ 425s] make[4]: Leaving directory '/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/vpp/build- >> root/build-vpp-native/vpp' >> [ 425s] make[3]: *** [Makefile:6764: all-recursive] Error 1 >> [ 425s] make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/vpp/build- >> root/build-vpp-native/vpp' >> [ 425s] make[2]: *** [Makefile:3426: all] Error 2 >> [ 425s] make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/vpp/build- >> root/build-vpp-native/vpp' >> [ 425s] make[1]: *** [Makefile:699: vpp-build] Error 2 >> [ 425s] make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/vpp/build- >> root' >> [ 425s] make: *** [Makefile:213: build-release] Error 2 >> [ 425s] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.t3xVux (%build) >> [ 425s] >> [ 425s] >> [ 425s] RPM build errors: >> [ 425s] Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.t3xVux (%build) >> [ 425s] >> [ 425s] linux-yk3w.suse failed "build vpp.spec" at Tue Apr 11 07:19:21 UTC >> 2017. >> [ 425s] >> >> >> On the other hand, when building the code using the in-repo dpdk source code I >> get the following one: >> >> CC test.o >> /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/6/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: >> /usr/lib64/libmvec_nonshared.a(svml_finite_alias.oS): relocation R_X86_64_PC32 >> against undefined symbol `_ZGVbN2v_log@@GLIBC_2.22' can not be used when >> making >> a shared object; recompile with -fPIC >> /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/6/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: final >> link failed: Bad value >> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status >> /home/mvarlese/repos/vpp/build-root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/dpdk- >> 17.02/mk/rte.app.mk:235 <http://rte.app.mk:235>: recipe for target 'cmdline_test' failed >> make[9]: *** [cmdline_test] Error 1 >> /home/mvarlese/repos/vpp/build-root/build-vpp-native/dpdk/dpdk- >> 17.02/mk/rte.subdir.mk:61 <http://rte.subdir.mk:61>: recipe for target 'cmdline_test' failed >> make[8]: *** [cmdline_test] Error 2 >> make[8]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs >> CC resource.o >> >> >> Thanks and regards, >> Marco >> >> ___ >> vpp-dev mailing list >> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> >> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev <https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev> > ___ > vpp-dev mailing list > vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev <https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev> ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev <https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev> ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* Fast Data Planes Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] "Jenkins is going to shut down" bar in jenkins webpage
Does anyone know what is meant by the Red Bar in jenkins that says "Jenkins is going to shut down" --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* SDN Group Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-plugins RPM dependency
Damjan, Thanks! On 03/24/2017 12:34 PM, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote: On 23 Mar 2017, at 14:26, Thomas F Herbert <mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 03/22/2017 04:36 PM, Feng Pan wrote: So this would suggest that VPP by default (that is, by doing 'yum install vpp') will not have dpdk support, and vpp-plugins must also be installed to add it, I would think dpdk plugin should be either packaged or installed together with VPP by default, and can be disabled if desired. In any case, will deployment model stay this way? I'll need to make changes to puppet module to include other packages if that's how it will be going forward. Also, dpdk section should be commented out in the config file so we can start VPP service using the default config. The dpdk plugin build process precipitated major headaches working for downstream packaging for Centos as well. I had a patch ready to submit for building from a dist tarball as a step toward building from a source rpm but that can't be used now. The main problem is vpp can no longer build from a isolated tarball without git. Out-of-tree build problem is very easily fixable, as I suggested in the review comments.It is unlikely to be more than 10 lines of shell script. Yes, I agree. It turns out to be a minor problem. I have a patch I will soon submit which will fix this. Installing the development rpm as part of downstream installation is not an option either. installation of devel rpm is not mandatory step, you can build vpp without development package installed. Yes, correct. The coming patch will utilize the dpdk tarball for now. The build process does not support dependency on an external rpm yet such as that which is built in rpm_dpdk project. I am thinking out load here but the best option for achieving packaging for 17.04 is to build dpdk from the tarball, bypass the dpdk rpm and include the upstream dpdk tarball in the srpm. Hopefully we can get a better solution figured out by next release over 17.0x that will work with the dpdk plugin concept. I’m not getting what is wrong with current setup, vpp is simple autotools project and packaging is free to invoke “cd src; ./configure; make; make install” as it is done with hundreds of different projects. There is nothing wrong with the current setup. It is an improvement to have DPDK as a plugin. I had to update the script for creating the dist and had to make a few minor changes to the dpdk Makefile that shouldn't affect current builds. -- *Thomas F Herbert* SDN Group Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
[vpp-dev] 5798: Simple patch to add checking for deps for RPMs
What is the outlook for this patch: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5798/ Patch set 2 was submitted on 3/21 to address Damjan's comments. --Tom -- *Thomas F Herbert* SDN Group Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-plugins RPM dependency
On 03/22/2017 04:36 PM, Feng Pan wrote: So this would suggest that VPP by default (that is, by doing 'yum install vpp') will not have dpdk support, and vpp-plugins must also be installed to add it, I would think dpdk plugin should be either packaged or installed together with VPP by default, and can be disabled if desired. In any case, will deployment model stay this way? I'll need to make changes to puppet module to include other packages if that's how it will be going forward. Also, dpdk section should be commented out in the config file so we can start VPP service using the default config. The dpdk plugin build process precipitated major headaches working for downstream packaging for Centos as well. I had a patch ready to submit for building from a dist tarball as a step toward building from a source rpm but that can't be used now. The main problem is vpp can no longer build from a isolated tarball without git. Installing the development rpm as part of downstream installation is not an option either. The build process does not support dependency on an external rpm yet such as that which is built in rpm_dpdk project. I am thinking out load here but the best option for achieving packaging for 17.04 is to build dpdk from the tarball, bypass the dpdk rpm and include the upstream dpdk tarball in the srpm. Hopefully we can get a better solution figured out by next release over 17.0x that will work with the dpdk plugin concept. Thanks Feng On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Ed Warnicke <mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>> wrote: Commenting out the dpdk stanza is a great workaround but we may want to look at bit more closely at the issue... as installing the vpp project should result in an out of the box runnable vpp. Ed On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Dave Barach (dbarach) mailto:dbar...@cisco.com>> wrote: Simply remove the “dpdk” stanza from /etc/vpp/startup.conf if you want to run vpp without the dpdk plugin. Thanks… Dave *From:*vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io>] *On Behalf Of *Feng Pan *Sent:* Wednesday, March 22, 2017 1:47 PM *To:* vpp-dev mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> *Subject:* [vpp-dev] vpp-plugins RPM dependency Hi All, With latest master builds of VPP (on Centos with rpm repo), it seems like it's necessary to install vpp-plugins package for vpp to start, without it, I get the following error when running vpp (with default config file): vlib_plugin_early_init:360: plugin path /usr/lib/vpp_plugins vlib_call_all_config_functions: unknown input `dpdk ' Looking at the spec file, vpp package depends on vpp-lib only, so it appears that we need to add vpp-plugins to the dependency list too. However, it also looks like vpp-plugins depends on vpp package, so I'm trying to figure out what the right dependency relationship is :) Thanks Feng ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev <https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev> ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* SDN Group Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Make pkg-rpm seems to be failing...
Please review: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5798/ On 03/20/2017 12:06 PM, Ed Warnicke wrote: Jon, Looking at : https://git.fd.io/vpp/tree/Makefile#n138 In make bootstrap... for deb packages on Ubuntu its checking to see if things are missing and failing fast if they are. I'd suggest we look at doing something similar for rpms. Anyone interested in submitting a patch? Ed On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Jon Loeliger <mailto:j...@netgate.com>> wrote: Burt and Ole, On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 7:26 AM, mailto:otr...@employees.org>> wrote: Hmm, so https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5781/ <https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5781/> isn't sufficient? Necessary, yes. Sufficient? No. On the other hand... On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Burt Silverman mailto:bur...@gmail.com>> wrote: Ugh, I made a terrible bone head mistake... Possibly I never ran make install-dep. Even if I had, I was unaware that it is a good idea to run it again, just to be sure, in a case like this. I probably thought it was like make bootstrap, where running a 2nd time doesn't help. Apologies to Ed and Ole for misinformation. So, Jon, were you in the same boat with me -- didn't do a double check of make install-dep? I guess so, because you still had the problem after Ole's fix. Burt This was precisely the problem here. I'll try to say this as politely as I can... Wow. That's some blind-siding sh*t. So, let's talk about that a bit. First, thank you for identifying the issue! This does indeed fix the build locally, and bring us back to online par. Thank you! Second, the notion of requiring repeated running of the make install-dep target as part of our daily build process from our CI engine is just not going to happen. NFW. We're not running anything has root like that. It's a bad idea for many reasons. On the flip side, I can make a job that "notices" a change in the installed packaged requirement and run that as, say, a daily job and incidentally notice that updates are needed. Sure, polling like that sucks; an interrupt here with a simple "Heads up! The install-deps have changed" would have been awesome! Thanks, jdl ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* SDN Group Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Re: [vpp-dev] Make pkg-rpm seems to be failing...
On 03/20/2017 12:06 PM, Ed Warnicke wrote: Jon, Looking at : https://git.fd.io/vpp/tree/Makefile#n138 In make bootstrap... for deb packages on Ubuntu its checking to see if things are missing and failing fast if they are. I'd suggest we look at doing something similar for rpms. Anyone interested in submitting a patch? I will submit the patch as there are other rpm packaging things I am working on. Ed On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Jon Loeliger <mailto:j...@netgate.com>> wrote: Burt and Ole, On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 7:26 AM, mailto:otr...@employees.org>> wrote: Hmm, so https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5781/ <https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5781/> isn't sufficient? Necessary, yes. Sufficient? No. On the other hand... On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Burt Silverman mailto:bur...@gmail.com>> wrote: Ugh, I made a terrible bone head mistake... Possibly I never ran make install-dep. Even if I had, I was unaware that it is a good idea to run it again, just to be sure, in a case like this. I probably thought it was like make bootstrap, where running a 2nd time doesn't help. Apologies to Ed and Ole for misinformation. So, Jon, were you in the same boat with me -- didn't do a double check of make install-dep? I guess so, because you still had the problem after Ole's fix. Burt This was precisely the problem here. I'll try to say this as politely as I can... Wow. That's some blind-siding sh*t. So, let's talk about that a bit. First, thank you for identifying the issue! This does indeed fix the build locally, and bring us back to online par. Thank you! Second, the notion of requiring repeated running of the make install-dep target as part of our daily build process from our CI engine is just not going to happen. NFW. We're not running anything has root like that. It's a bad idea for many reasons. On the flip side, I can make a job that "notices" a change in the installed packaged requirement and run that as, say, a daily job and incidentally notice that updates are needed. Sure, polling like that sucks; an interrupt here with a simple "Heads up! The install-deps have changed" would have been awesome! Thanks, jdl ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev -- *Thomas F Herbert* SDN Group Office of Technology *Red Hat* ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
