Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
Hello Micah, Micah Anderson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joel, Please do not hijack threads, it is better to start a new thread with a new subject. If you use an existing thread to talk about something completely different than the thread's subject, it causes a lot of problems with mail and news readers. Also, you cannot just change the subject line to create a new thread. Most news and mail readers use other headers such as References: to track and build the thread of messages by message ID, and changing the subject line does not change the actual threading. Therefore, one should always compose a new (and therefore reference-free) message when changing topics. Ah ok (thanks for explanation, I have no detailed knowledge on e-mail client, sorry) I will take care next time ;-) Joel Soete wrote: Hello Micah, I just read the changelog of your debian's pkg upload (util-vserver (0.30.209-2) unstable) and btw discover: o it was re-enable for hppa ;-) o and it's build with dietlibc (now available also for this arch too) So my question is: was it already tested on this arch? No, it was re-enabled after a long period of being disabled, and needs to be tested by someone with that arch. If you can test it, it would be appreciated. Ok I did it and unfortunately failled ;-( On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest 0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this time) and all seems to works fine. What is "toh"? oops sorry fingers didn't any more follow my mind: I would mean otoh (on the other hand) I would prefer to use dietlibc if possible as it seems to be required to handle some corner security issues. Understood. (But tbh I'm still ignoring what kind of pb am I supposed to encounter) tbh?: To be honest pb?: problem I'm sorry, I am not able to parse your acronyms! np ;-) (no problem) Cool. Thanks for your attention, Joel ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 05:11:55PM -0500, micah wrote: > In gmane.linux.vserver, you wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Herbert Poetzl wrote: > >> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > >> >>On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest > >> >>0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this > >> >>time) and all seems to works fine. > >> > > >> > > >> > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it > >> > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc > >> > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_ > >> > work for simple things. > >> > >> I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests? > > > > possible, well, testme and testfs will not > > detect the insecurities introduced by glibc > > Ah, I meant we can find out if dietlibc is broken on HPPA or not. I > did not mean we can find out if glibc insecurities still exist. hmm, well, then see: http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg12138.html > >> > PS: I hope that dietlibc on hppa will be fixed soon. > >> > >> Have the issues on HPPA been brought to the dietlibc developers? > > > > yes, but AFAICT, they were ignored ... > > I tried to google around for references to this to see if I could help > push these up, but didn't find anything. Sometimes all it takes is a > ping to the right place to get people to realise that they overlooked > something. please do so if possible :) TIA, Herbert > Micah > ___ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
On Fri February 3 2006 16:14, micah wrote: > In gmane.linux.vserver, you wrote: > > On Fri February 3 2006 12:04, Joel Soete wrote: > >> > > >> Appologies for late answer but this isp webmail interface is very a > >> nightmare > >> (it tooks me all this afternoon to reach to login Grrr). > >> > > Joel, > > > > I sent you a possible solution to that problem. > > Of course, that does not mean you received it. > > If this was a solution to Joel's problem with dietlib, can you re-send > it to the list so the rest of us can know the answer? I'd like to be > able to reference it in the future if other HPPA users come here with > the same problem. :) > Sorry, I wasn't clear... The ISP problem, not the dietlibc problems. Due to the ISP problem, I had to steal a little m-l bandwidth. Apologies, Mike ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
In gmane.linux.vserver, you wrote: > On Fri February 3 2006 12:04, Joel Soete wrote: >> > >> Appologies for late answer but this isp webmail interface is very a nightmare >> (it tooks me all this afternoon to reach to login Grrr). >> > Joel, > > I sent you a possible solution to that problem. > Of course, that does not mean you received it. If this was a solution to Joel's problem with dietlib, can you re-send it to the list so the rest of us can know the answer? I'd like to be able to reference it in the future if other HPPA users come here with the same problem. :) micah ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
In gmane.linux.vserver, you wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Herbert Poetzl wrote: >> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: >> >>On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest >> >>0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this >> >>time) and all seems to works fine. >> > >> > >> > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it >> > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc >> > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_ >> > work for simple things. >> >> I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests? > > possible, well, testme and testfs will not > detect the insecurities introduced by glibc Ah, I meant we can find out if dietlibc is broken on HPPA or not. I did not mean we can find out if glibc insecurities still exist. >> > PS: I hope that dietlibc on hppa will be fixed soon. >> >> Have the issues on HPPA been brought to the dietlibc developers? > > yes, but AFAICT, they were ignored ... I tried to google around for references to this to see if I could help push these up, but didn't find anything. Sometimes all it takes is a ping to the right place to get people to realise that they overlooked something. Micah ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
On Fri February 3 2006 12:04, Joel Soete wrote: > > > Appologies for late answer but this isp webmail interface is very a nightmare > (it tooks me all this afternoon to reach to login Grrr). > Joel, I sent you a possible solution to that problem. Of course, that does not mean you received it. When you get a chance this weekend to beat on your e-mail service, let me know off-list if you didn't receive it. Mike ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
Hello Micah, Herbert, Mike, ...
>
> Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote:
> >>On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest
> >>0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this
> >>time) and all seems to works fine.
> >
> >
> > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it
> > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc
> > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_
> > work for simple things.
>
> I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests?
>
Appologies for late answer but this isp webmail interface is very a nightmare
(it tooks me all this afternoon to reach to login Grrr).
That said if this interface was more confortable I would probably 'subject'
it: 'new util-vserver-0.30.209-2.deb failled to restart my vps ;_('
Let me tail more few words:
1/ when I installed the pkg a vps (a guest) was still runing and I want
to check that:
# vserver-stat
CTX PROCVSZRSS userTIME sysTIMEUPTIME NAME
0 76 135.7M 46.7M 18m55s70 17m46s40 6h15m00 root server
491529 38.3M 10.8M 0m03s20 0m14s73 6h08m37 <== it
would show DebSid
too bad ;-(
(mmm, btw wouldn't have to stop vps before upgrading? [very no idea])
2/ I then restart the host and try to re-start my guest:
# vserver DebSid start
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
check-unixfile: lseek(): Invalid argument
secure-mount: read(): Success
GRrrr.
Definitly, dietlibc is broken for hppa (not only test) ;-(
I so rebuild latest util-vserver-0.30.210 (disabling dietlibc use) and make
install by hand and restart my guest without pb, though.
> > PS: I hope that dietlibc on hppa will be fixed soon.
>
> Have the issues on HPPA been brought to the dietlibc developers?
>
mmm, as I just discover that it was re-enable since short, I didn't
investigate more, I will try to get some more info?
Tx for kind attention,
Joel
PS: I will take care of all other kind answers from my linux box at home this
week end.
---
A free anti-spam and anti-virus filter on all Scarlet mailboxes
More info on http://www.scarlet.be/
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
On Thu February 2 2006 21:55, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:08:38PM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote: > > On Thu February 2 2006 19:32, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:33:16PM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote: > > > > On Thu February 2 2006 14:09, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it > > > > > > > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc > > > > > > > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_ > > > > > > > work for simple things. > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests? > > > > > > > > > > possible, well, testme and testfs will not > > > > > detect the insecurities introduced by glibc > > > > > > > > > Are there any tests available to check for these glibc problems? > > > > > > I don't know of explicit tests, but it should be > > > possible to create some, given that somebody wants > > > to spend time on it ... > > > > > > > If not, perhaps a pointer or two into the mail archives on > > > > the subject or pointer(s) to a discussion of the problems found? > > > > > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg09379.html > > > (there are others, just goolge for it) > > > Thanks, now I read what the concerns are. . . > > > > That message is about the date of glibc-2.3.2 - current is 2.3.6 > > > > There has been a fair number of changes done between those versions. > > Some affecting getpwnam() and friends when used in staticly linked > > programs. > > well, please also check how 'small' the statically > linked tools would be when linked against recent glibc > (statically of course :) > That I can do - Just need to look up the information on build machine. This is off topic for the subject - so will break this thread. > > I think both of the mentioned restrictions can now be enforced. > > would be good as a last resort when dietlibc is failing > (as it is currently the case for parisc) > > > Let me spend some time on checking that statement before I go too > > far out on a limb. > > please do so, and keep us posted ... > Next update will be a thread tagged: [glibc] for future m-l reference. Mike ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:08:38PM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote: > On Thu February 2 2006 19:32, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:33:16PM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote: > > > On Thu February 2 2006 14:09, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it > > > > > > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc > > > > > > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_ > > > > > > work for simple things. > > > > > > > > > > I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests? > > > > > > > > possible, well, testme and testfs will not > > > > detect the insecurities introduced by glibc > > > > > > > Are there any tests available to check for these glibc problems? > > > > I don't know of explicit tests, but it should be > > possible to create some, given that somebody wants > > to spend time on it ... > > > > > If not, perhaps a pointer or two into the mail archives on > > > the subject or pointer(s) to a discussion of the problems found? > > > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg09379.html > > (there are others, just goolge for it) > Thanks, now I read what the concerns are. . . > > That message is about the date of glibc-2.3.2 - current is 2.3.6 > > There has been a fair number of changes done between those versions. > Some affecting getpwnam() and friends when used in staticly linked > programs. well, please also check how 'small' the statically linked tools would be when linked against recent glibc (statically of course :) > I think both of the mentioned restrictions can now be enforced. would be good as a last resort when dietlibc is failing (as it is currently the case for parisc) > Let me spend some time on checking that statement before I go too > far out on a limb. please do so, and keep us posted ... thanks, Herbert > Mike > > ___ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
On Thu February 2 2006 19:32, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:33:16PM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote: > > On Thu February 2 2006 14:09, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it > > > > > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc > > > > > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_ > > > > > work for simple things. > > > > > > > > I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests? > > > > > > possible, well, testme and testfs will not > > > detect the insecurities introduced by glibc > > > > > Are there any tests available to check for these glibc problems? > > I don't know of explicit tests, but it should be > possible to create some, given that somebody wants > to spend time on it ... > > > If not, perhaps a pointer or two into the mail archives on > > the subject or pointer(s) to a discussion of the problems found? > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg09379.html > (there are others, just goolge for it) > Thanks, now I read what the concerns are. . . That message is about the date of glibc-2.3.2 - current is 2.3.6 There has been a fair number of changes done between those versions. Some affecting getpwnam() and friends when used in staticly linked programs. I think both of the mentioned restrictions can now be enforced. Let me spend some time on checking that statement before I go too far out on a limb. Mike ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:33:16PM -0600, Michael S. Zick wrote: > On Thu February 2 2006 14:09, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it > > > > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc > > > > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_ > > > > work for simple things. > > > > > > I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests? > > > > possible, well, testme and testfs will not > > detect the insecurities introduced by glibc > > > Are there any tests available to check for these glibc problems? I don't know of explicit tests, but it should be possible to create some, given that somebody wants to spend time on it ... > If not, perhaps a pointer or two into the mail archives on > the subject or pointer(s) to a discussion of the problems found? http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg09379.html (there are others, just goolge for it) IMHO dietlibc isn't a bad choice after all, although I was initially annoyed by the change, why? - we get smaller binaries - we can easily test on various platforms as diet has excellent support for cross compiling - the resulting code is somewhat efficient, so much simpler to debug than glibc - we get the 'security' of statically linked executables (which means we do not have to worry) - we do not have to struggle with distro specific libc modifications or features (or lack thereof) best, Herbert > Mike > ___ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
On Thu February 2 2006 14:09, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > > > > > > > > > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it > > > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc > > > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_ > > > work for simple things. > > > > I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests? > > possible, well, testme and testfs will not > detect the insecurities introduced by glibc > Are there any tests available to check for these glibc problems? If not, perhaps a pointer or two into the mail archives on the subject or pointer(s) to a discussion of the problems found? Mike ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > >>On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest > >>0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this > >>time) and all seems to works fine. > > > > > > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it > > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc > > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_ > > work for simple things. > > I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests? possible, well, testme and testfs will not detect the insecurities introduced by glibc > > PS: I hope that dietlibc on hppa will be fixed soon. > > Have the issues on HPPA been brought to the dietlibc developers? yes, but AFAICT, they were ignored ... best, Herbert > micah > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFD4l2h9n4qXRzy1ioRAsKMAKCv8YQr/D/9YQDQc/XOAQO/pJwe2wCggmD+ > sRKaersGBPipGCipwjTdHP0= > =YeQB > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: >>On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest >>0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this >>time) and all seems to works fine. > > > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_ > work for simple things. I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests? > PS: I hope that dietlibc on hppa will be fixed soon. Have the issues on HPPA been brought to the dietlibc developers? micah -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD4l2h9n4qXRzy1ioRAsKMAKCv8YQr/D/9YQDQc/XOAQO/pJwe2wCggmD+ sRKaersGBPipGCipwjTdHP0= =YeQB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
On Thu February 2 2006 12:21, Micah Anderson wrote: > > Joel, > - - - snip > > What is "toh"? I would prefer to use dietlibc if possible as it seems to > be required to handle some corner security issues. > (on) The Other Hand Mike > > (But tbh I'm still ignoring what kind of pb am I supposed to encounter) > > I'm sorry, I am not able to parse your acronyms! > ? -ENOACRO ? Mike ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joel, Please do not hijack threads, it is better to start a new thread with a new subject. If you use an existing thread to talk about something completely different than the thread's subject, it causes a lot of problems with mail and news readers. Also, you cannot just change the subject line to create a new thread. Most news and mail readers use other headers such as References: to track and build the thread of messages by message ID, and changing the subject line does not change the actual threading. Therefore, one should always compose a new (and therefore reference-free) message when changing topics. Joel Soete wrote: > Hello Micah, > > I just read the changelog of your debian's pkg upload (util-vserver > (0.30.209-2) unstable) and btw discover: > o it was re-enable for hppa ;-) > o and it's build with dietlibc (now available also for this arch too) > > So my question is: was it already tested on this arch? No, it was re-enabled after a long period of being disabled, and needs to be tested by someone with that arch. If you can test it, it would be appreciated. > On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest > 0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this > time) and all seems to works fine. What is "toh"? I would prefer to use dietlibc if possible as it seems to be required to handle some corner security issues. > (But tbh I'm still ignoring what kind of pb am I supposed to encounter) I'm sorry, I am not able to parse your acronyms! Micah -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD4k2f9n4qXRzy1ioRAgE+AKCNSjFwgU3YR7xsSM2AfJtPuUPtRwCggTFq bpj4fogMkfkdDx9Uh8gM2Yo= =k4Fm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:40:29PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > > > > > > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > > > >>>Btw may I ask you to add this -n (i.e. no_color option) to testme. > > >>>That would look like: > > > > > > > > >>no problem, will put it into the next version ... > > > > > >>thanks, > > >>Herbert > > > > > > I thought that the -n (no_color) option was added after I sent a similar > > > patch back in October[1]? > > > > > > > > >> yes, it was, but (if you read your mail again) only > > >> to the testfs.sh script, not the testme.sh one ... > > > > /me hits head with hand. > > > > micah > Hello Micah, > > I just read the changelog of your debian's pkg upload (util-vserver > (0.30.209-2) unstable) and btw discover: > o it was re-enable for hppa ;-) > o and it's build with dietlibc (now available also for this arch too) > > So my question is: was it already tested on this arch? > > (I'm worry because I also play to rebuild dietlibc to run test and many > failed (e.g. stdio test), though). > > On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest > 0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this > time) and all seems to works fine. really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_ work for simple things. be careful as glibc is neither secure nor reliable when used to create or enter guests ... nevertheless for 'normal' administrative management or in a known secure environment it should work 'as expected'. best, Herbert PS: I hope that dietlibc on hppa will be fixed soon. > (But tbh I'm still ignoring what kind of pb am I supposed to encounter) > > TIA for advise, > Joel > > --- > NOTE! My email address is changing to ... @scarlet.be > Please make the necessary changes in your address book. > > > > ___ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:40:29PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > > > > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > >>>Btw may I ask you to add this -n (i.e. no_color option) to testme. > >>>That would look like: > > > > > >>no problem, will put it into the next version ... > > > >>thanks, > >>Herbert > > > > I thought that the -n (no_color) option was added after I sent a similar > > patch back in October[1]? > > > > > >> yes, it was, but (if you read your mail again) only > >> to the testfs.sh script, not the testme.sh one ... > > /me hits head with hand. > > micah Hello Micah, I just read the changelog of your debian's pkg upload (util-vserver (0.30.209-2) unstable) and btw discover: o it was re-enable for hppa ;-) o and it's build with dietlibc (now available also for this arch too) So my question is: was it already tested on this arch? (I'm worry because I also play to rebuild dietlibc to run test and many failed (e.g. stdio test), though). On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest 0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this time) and all seems to works fine. (But tbh I'm still ignoring what kind of pb am I supposed to encounter) TIA for advise, Joel --- NOTE! My email address is changing to ... @scarlet.be Please make the necessary changes in your address book. ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 07:48:25AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > > Hello Herbert, > > > > The latest test seems always ok (I mean no regression imho) on this > > parisc 32bit up kernel ;-) > > great! > > nitpick: let's prefix the tests with [ARCH] in the future > (for ML postings) to simplify searching ... > Good catch, I will try to take care on next time ;-) > btw, we a planning to support an -m 'mail' option to > send the arch info to the ML in the near future ... > cool ;-) (even thought my compamy fw didn't allow smtp port usage, it would be great to just cut and past the 'template' mail temporary file in the webmail interface of my own isp (obiously company mail box is also forbiden :_( )) [...] > > > > Btw may I ask you to add this -n (i.e. no_color option) to testme. > > That would look like: > > no problem, will put it into the next version ... > Nice :-) Tx, Joel --- NOTE! My email address is changing to ... @scarlet.be Please make the necessary changes in your address book. ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:40:29PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > >>>Btw may I ask you to add this -n (i.e. no_color option) to testme. >>>That would look like: > > >>no problem, will put it into the next version ... > >>thanks, >>Herbert > > I thought that the -n (no_color) option was added after I sent a similar > patch back in October[1]? > > >> yes, it was, but (if you read your mail again) only >> to the testfs.sh script, not the testme.sh one ... /me hits head with hand. micah -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD4SG59n4qXRzy1ioRAsJ/AJ9GiMfPLq1GwiST/Zng1pLiiRnZVQCdF6iY 9faF5SBsx7eSi8ppXLUXpzA= =iGTQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:40:29PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > >>Btw may I ask you to add this -n (i.e. no_color option) to testme. > >>That would look like: > > > > > > no problem, will put it into the next version ... > > > > thanks, > > Herbert > > I thought that the -n (no_color) option was added after I sent a similar > patch back in October[1]? yes, it was, but (if you read your mail again) only to the testfs.sh script, not the testme.sh one ... best, Herbert > Micah > > 1. http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg10918.html > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFD4QCd9n4qXRzy1ioRAtNAAJwJierglR+/ufpIpIUDaOsfQltKugCfVG0t > 1x55Xg0BgliW2mEDNE9TBCU= > =eGnX > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Herbert Poetzl wrote: >>Btw may I ask you to add this -n (i.e. no_color option) to testme. >>That would look like: > > > no problem, will put it into the next version ... > > thanks, > Herbert I thought that the -n (no_color) option was added after I sent a similar patch back in October[1]? Micah 1. http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg10918.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD4QCd9n4qXRzy1ioRAtNAAJwJierglR+/ufpIpIUDaOsfQltKugCfVG0t 1x55Xg0BgliW2mEDNE9TBCU= =eGnX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9 latest test on parisc
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 07:48:25AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > Hello Herbert, > > The latest test seems always ok (I mean no regression imho) on this > parisc 32bit up kernel ;-) great! nitpick: let's prefix the tests with [ARCH] in the future (for ML postings) to simplify searching ... btw, we a planning to support an -m 'mail' option to send the arch info to the ML in the near future ... > Linux patst007 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9-pa2-d32up #3 Tue Jan 31 08:16:56 CET 2006 > parisc GNU/Linux > Linux-VServer Test [V0.15] Copyright (C) 2003-2006 H.Poetzl > chcontext is working. > chbind is working. > Linux 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9-pa2-d32up #3 Tue Jan 31 08:16:56 CET 2006 parisc > Ea 0.30.209 263/fallback (S*) > VCI: 0002:0001 263 03000116 (TbLgnP) > --- > [000]# succeeded. > [001]# succeeded. > [011]# succeeded. > [031]# succeeded. > [101]# succeeded. > [102]# succeeded. > [201]# succeeded. > [202]# succeeded. > --- > [L01]# succeeded. > [D01]# succeeded. > [L02]# succeeded. > [D02]# succeeded. > [L03]# succeeded. > [D03]# succeeded. > [L11]# succeeded. > [D11]# succeeded. > [L12]# succeeded. > [D12]# succeeded. > [L21]# succeeded. > [D21]# succeeded. > [L22]# succeeded. > [D22]# succeeded. > [L31]# succeeded. > [D31]# succeeded. > > Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.12] Copyright (C) 2005-2006 H.Poetzl > Linux 2.6.16-rc1-vs2.1.0.9-pa2-d32up parisc/0.30.209 > VCI: 0002:0001 263 03000116 (ugid24) > --- > testing ext2 filesystem ... > [000]. (ext2 format) > xid related tests ... > [001]. [002]. [011]. [012]. [014]. [015]. [019]. > [020]. [021]. [022]. [023]. [024]. [025]. [026]. [027]. [028]. > [033]. [034]. [035]. [037]. > xattr related tests ... > [101]. [102]. [103]. [104]. [106]. [108]. [109]. > [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119]. > [121]. [122]. [123]. [124]. [199]. > > --- > testing ext3 filesystem ... > [000]. (ext3 format) > xid related tests ... > [001]. [002]. [011]. [012]. [014]. [015]. [019]. > [020]. [021]. [022]. [023]. [024]. [025]. [026]. [027]. [028]. > [033]. [034]. [035]. [037]. > xattr related tests ... > [101]. [102]. [103]. [104]. [106]. [108]. [109]. > [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119]. > [121]. [122]. [123]. [124]. [199]. > > --- > testing xfs filesystem ... > [000]. (xfs format) > xid related tests ... > [001]. [002]. [011]. [012]. [014]. [015]. [019]. > [020]. [021]. [022]. [023]. [024]. [025]. [026]. [027]. [028]. > [033]. [034]. [035]. [037]. > xattr related tests ... > [101]. [102]. [103]. [104]. [106]. [108]. [109]. > [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119]. > [121]. [122]. [123]. [124]. [199]. > > --- > testing reiser filesystem ... > [000]. (reiserfs format) > xid related tests ... > [001]. [002]. [011]. [012]. [014]. [015]. [019]. > [020]. [021]. [022]. [023]. [024]. [025]. [026]. [027]. [028]. > [033]. [034]. [035]. [037]. > xattr related tests ... > [101]. [102]. [103]. [104]. [106]. [108]. [109]. > [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119]. > [121]. [122]. [123]. [124]. [199]. > > --- > testing jfs filesystem ... > [000]. (jfs format) > xid related tests ... > [001]. [002]. [011]. [012]. [014]. [015]. [019]. > [020]. [021]. [022]. [023]. [024]. [025]. [026]. [027]. [028]. > [033]. [034]. [035]. [037]. > xattr related tests ... > [101]. [102]. [103]. [104]* [106]. [108]. [109]. > [112]. [113]. [114]* [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119]. > [121]* [122]* [123]* [124]* [199]. > > Btw may I ask you to add this -n (i.e. no_color option) to testme. > That would look like: no problem, will put it into the next version ... thanks, Herbert > # diff -Nau testme.sh.Orig testme.sh > --- testme.sh.Orig 2006-01-31 13:46:09.0 +0100 > +++ testme.sh 2006-01-31 14:03:20.0 +0100 > @@ -69,13 +69,14 @@ > > > verbose=0 > -while getopts ":hqvA:L" option; do > +while getopts ":hnqvA:L" option; do >case $option in > h) # help > cat << EOF > Usage: $cmdname [OPTION]... > >-hhelp > + -nno color codes >-qquick test >-v be verbose >-A [ARCH] architecture specific tests > @@ -92,6 +93,10 @@ > q) # just do quick tests > quick=1 > ;; > +n) # no color > +eR='';eG='';eY='';eB='';eN='' > +nocolor=1; > +;; > v) # be verbose > verbose=$(( verbose + 1 )) > ;; > <> > > TIA&HTH, > Joel > > --- > NOTE! My email address is changing to ... @scarlet.be > Please make the necessary changes in your address book. > > ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
