Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2008-01-08 Thread Robyn Orosz
   I think your nexthop IP should be your ISP IP
> > address and
> > > not your
> > > > own. Also check with your ISP if they can confirm about
>     > BGP session
> > > > establishment, Most router like Juniper, Cisco can
> explain
> > a lot
> > > in their
> > > > output the reasons if the session is not established.
> > > >
> > > > Also loopback IP is normally used in BGP if you have
> multiple
> > > interfaces
> > > > connected to same ISP, or you are using some other
> complex
> > > configuration. I
> > > > would use interface IP connected to ISP to avoid routing
> > issues
> > > etc.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Ahsan Khan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > >  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > >  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>] On Behalf Of Poh
> > > Yong Hwang
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:20 PM
> > > > To: Justin Fletcher
> > > > Cc: vyatta-users
> > > > Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks. I just could not traceroute to the router and
> > according
> > > to my
> > > > peering upstream, they mention that they did not
> receive
> > any of
> > > my prefix
> > > > announcement.
> > > >
> > > > Basically i just want to do a simple setup at this
> moment
> > with
> > > one box
> > > > running Vyatta and eth0 is link to one of our upstream
> > provider
> > > which we
> > > > want to peer with. I have my ASN number as well as a
> /21 range
> > > of IP
> > > > addresses to announce. Here is my configuration:
> > > >
> > > > loopback ip : 10.0.0.65 <http://10.0.0.65>
> <http://10.0.0.65> < http://10.0.0.65>
> > > > My ASN : 100
> > > > My IP Range : XX.XX.XX.XX/21
> > > >
> > > > Upstream Route IP : a.b.c.d
> > > > Customer Interface IP : c.d.e.f
> > > > Upstream ASN : 200
> > > >
> > > > protocols {
> > > > bgp {
> > > > bgp-id: 10.0.0.65 <http://10.0.0.65> <
> http://10.0.0.65> <
> > http://10.0.0.65>
> > > > local-as: 100
> > > > import: ""
> > > > export: "BGP_EXPORT"
> > > > peer " a.b.c.d" {
> > > > import: ""
> > > > export: ""
> > > > multihop: 1
> > > > peer-port: 179
> > > > local-port: 179
> > > > local-ip: c.d.e.f
> > > > as: 9989
> > > > next-hop: c.d.e.f
> > > > holdtime: 90
> > > > delay-open-time: 0
> > > > client: false
> > > > co

[Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2008-01-07 Thread Ken Felix (C)
We need more information than what's present, but if this a  internet
BGP peering , make sure you have neighborship with your  upstream and
your  prefix is being sent.

 

Also  review various route-servers to check that your announcement is
being seen by the internet. I personally like att's,  but savvis and
gblx all supports telnet'able route servers  or you can used the  web
version via sprint or level3.

 

(telnet route servers )

 

Route-server.ip.att.net

Route-server.savvis.net

Route-server.gblx.net

Route-server.host.net

 

( web links )

 

http://lg.level3.net/bgp/bgp.cgi

http://www.cisconet.com/route-server/world_map.html

 

Lastly, if your prefix is not  installed in the RouteRegistery than
nobody will except this ( local upstream provider ). So confirm with
them that your prefiex(es) are allowed and any BGP  policies locally are
updated if required.

 

Hope this helps ;)

 

___
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users


Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2008-01-07 Thread Robyn Orosz
t's not there, verify your
> > configuration etc.
> >
> > If it is there, make sure the prefix in your policy matches
> the route
> > exactly.  If it does not match, it won't be advertised.
> >
> > If all of the above are correct, take a look at 'show bgp
> route' and
> > make sure you see your advertised prefix in the output.  If
> it's there
> > then your ISP is probably rejecting your advertisement.
>  They need to
> > add your prefix to their prefix list.  ISPs forget to add their
> > customer's prefixes to their prefix lists all the time.
> >
> > The loopback address for the BGP ID won't hurt anything but
> Ahsan is
> > correct that for eBGP peering with external public peers,
> you should
> > probably set your BGP ID to your public IP on eth0.
> >
> > Thanks!  and I hope this helps.
> >
> > -Robyn
> >
> > Ahsan Khan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >   I think your nexthop IP should be your ISP IP
> address and
> > not your
> > > own. Also check with your ISP if they can confirm about
> BGP session
> > > establishment, Most router like Juniper, Cisco can explain
> a lot
> > in their
> > > output the reasons if the session is not established.
> > >
> > > Also loopback IP is normally used in BGP if you have multiple
>     > interfaces
> > > connected to same ISP, or you are using some other complex
> > configuration. I
> > > would use interface IP connected to ISP to avoid routing
> issues
> > etc.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Ahsan Khan
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>] On Behalf Of Poh
> > Yong Hwang
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:20 PM
> > > To: Justin Fletcher
> > > Cc: vyatta-users
> > > Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks. I just could not traceroute to the router and
> according
> > to my
> > > peering upstream, they mention that they did not receive
> any of
> > my prefix
> > > announcement.
> > >
> > > Basically i just want to do a simple setup at this moment
> with
> > one box
> > > running Vyatta and eth0 is link to one of our upstream
> provider
> > which we
> > > want to peer with. I have my ASN number as well as a /21 range
> > of IP
> > > addresses to announce. Here is my configuration:
> > >
> > > loopback ip : 10.0.0.65 <http://10.0.0.65> < http://10.0.0.65>
> > > My ASN : 100
> > > My IP Range : XX.XX.XX.XX/21
> > >
> > > Upstream Route IP : a.b.c.d
> > > Customer Interface IP : c.d.e.f
> > > Upstream ASN : 200
> > >
> > > protocols {
> > > bgp {
> > > bgp-id: 10.0.0.65 <http://10.0.0.65> <
> http://10.0.0.65>
> > > local-as: 100
> > > import: ""
> > > export: "BGP_EXPORT"
> > > peer " a.b.c.d" {
> > > import: ""
> > > export: ""
> > > multihop: 1
> > > peer-port: 179
> > > local-port: 179
> > > local-ip: c.d.e.f
> > > as: 9989
> > > next-hop: c.d.e.f
> > > holdtime: 90
> > > delay-open-time: 0
> > >

Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2008-01-07 Thread Poh Yong Hwang
Hi,

I tried to add a ip address 11.11.11.12 with prefix length of 21 to eth1.
But i still cannot remote access or ping to this ip address from outside. I
hope to able to access the web gui of Vyatta remotely using the eth1 ip
address. Also this eth1 will be link to a switch and to the rest of the
servers, so am I right to set all the servers default gateway to be
11.11.11.12 which is the ip address of the eth1?

thanks for all your patience



On Jan 4, 2008 10:25 PM, Robyn Orosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm glad to hear you have it working now.
>
> Since you are exporting your aggregate (/21) via a static route to your
> loopback interface, you don't have to assign the entire /21 to eth1.
> You can segment it in whatever way you choose as it will still always be
> exported as a /21 based on your existing policy.  Basically, you can set
> whatever IP and prefix length you want on your eth1 as long as it is a
> valid part of your /21 aggregate prefix.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Robyn
>
> Poh Yong Hwang wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Sorry for getting back so late as I am tied up with some other
> > stuffs.. Thanks for all the advice and my upstream managed to see my
> > prefix. Seems that changing the next hop to my eth0 public ip address
> > did the trick.
> >
> > Now as my eth0 is connected to my upstream, what IP address should I
> > set on my eth1? It will be connected to a layer 3 switch (core switch)
> > which all our servers will be connected to that switch. I have a /21
> > range of ip addresses, so should I just use the first ip to set on
> > eth1? What prefix-length should I set on that as well?
> >
> > Please advise.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 20, 2007 1:52 AM, Robyn Orosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi There,
> >
> > The next-hop value is providing the peer with the next-hop value
> > to use
> > for the advertised prefixes from your router.  So, the next-hop
> should
> > be an address on your router.  It looks correct based on your edited
> > configuration file.
> >
> > If you run a 'show bgp peers' it will show you whether or not your
> > session is established with your peer.  If it's not established,
> that
> > would be one reason why the ISP claims they did not receive a prefix
> > advertisement from you.  First off, verify your configuration is
> > correct
> > (IPs, ASNs etc).  Then you can run a tshark on eth0 (your BGP
> peering
> > interface) on port 179 (tshark -i eth0 port 179 -Vn) to take a
> > look at
> > the BGP packets and also take a look at the logs 'show log.'
> >
> > If your session is established, make sure the route you are
> > advertising
> > with your policy exists in the routing table and matches the
> > prefix in
> > the policy.  You can check the route by running a 'show route
> protocol
> > static.'  You must see the static route that you've pointed to your
> > loopback interface in the table.  If it's not there, verify your
> > configuration etc.
> >
> > If it is there, make sure the prefix in your policy matches the
> route
> > exactly.  If it does not match, it won't be advertised.
> >
> > If all of the above are correct, take a look at 'show bgp route' and
> > make sure you see your advertised prefix in the output.  If it's
> there
> > then your ISP is probably rejecting your advertisement.  They need
> to
> > add your prefix to their prefix list.  ISPs forget to add their
> > customer's prefixes to their prefix lists all the time.
> >
> > The loopback address for the BGP ID won't hurt anything but Ahsan is
> > correct that for eBGP peering with external public peers, you should
> > probably set your BGP ID to your public IP on eth0.
> >
> > Thanks!  and I hope this helps.
> >
> > -Robyn
> >
> > Ahsan Khan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >   I think your nexthop IP should be your ISP IP address and
> > not your
> > > own. Also check with your ISP if they can confirm about BGP
> session
> > > establishment, Most router like Juniper, Cisco can explain a lot
> > in their
> > > output the reasons if the session is not established.
> > >
> > > Also loopback IP is normally used in BGP if you 

Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2008-01-04 Thread Robyn Orosz
Hi,

I'm glad to hear you have it working now. 

Since you are exporting your aggregate (/21) via a static route to your 
loopback interface, you don't have to assign the entire /21 to eth1.  
You can segment it in whatever way you choose as it will still always be 
exported as a /21 based on your existing policy.  Basically, you can set 
whatever IP and prefix length you want on your eth1 as long as it is a 
valid part of your /21 aggregate prefix.

Thank you,

Robyn

Poh Yong Hwang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for getting back so late as I am tied up with some other 
> stuffs.. Thanks for all the advice and my upstream managed to see my 
> prefix. Seems that changing the next hop to my eth0 public ip address 
> did the trick.
>
> Now as my eth0 is connected to my upstream, what IP address should I 
> set on my eth1? It will be connected to a layer 3 switch (core switch) 
> which all our servers will be connected to that switch. I have a /21 
> range of ip addresses, so should I just use the first ip to set on 
> eth1? What prefix-length should I set on that as well?
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> On Dec 20, 2007 1:52 AM, Robyn Orosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Hi There,
>
> The next-hop value is providing the peer with the next-hop value
> to use
> for the advertised prefixes from your router.  So, the next-hop should
> be an address on your router.  It looks correct based on your edited
> configuration file.
>
> If you run a 'show bgp peers' it will show you whether or not your
> session is established with your peer.  If it's not established, that
> would be one reason why the ISP claims they did not receive a prefix
> advertisement from you.  First off, verify your configuration is
> correct
> (IPs, ASNs etc).  Then you can run a tshark on eth0 (your BGP peering
> interface) on port 179 (tshark -i eth0 port 179 -Vn) to take a
> look at
> the BGP packets and also take a look at the logs 'show log.'
>
> If your session is established, make sure the route you are
> advertising
> with your policy exists in the routing table and matches the
> prefix in
> the policy.  You can check the route by running a 'show route protocol
> static.'  You must see the static route that you've pointed to your
> loopback interface in the table.  If it's not there, verify your
> configuration etc.
>
> If it is there, make sure the prefix in your policy matches the route
> exactly.  If it does not match, it won't be advertised.
>
> If all of the above are correct, take a look at 'show bgp route' and
> make sure you see your advertised prefix in the output.  If it's there
> then your ISP is probably rejecting your advertisement.  They need to
> add your prefix to their prefix list.  ISPs forget to add their
> customer's prefixes to their prefix lists all the time.
>
> The loopback address for the BGP ID won't hurt anything but Ahsan is
> correct that for eBGP peering with external public peers, you should
> probably set your BGP ID to your public IP on eth0.
>
> Thanks!  and I hope this helps.
>
> -Robyn
>
> Ahsan Khan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >   I think your nexthop IP should be your ISP IP address and
> not your
> > own. Also check with your ISP if they can confirm about BGP session
> > establishment, Most router like Juniper, Cisco can explain a lot
> in their
> > output the reasons if the session is not established.
> >
> > Also loopback IP is normally used in BGP if you have multiple
> interfaces
> > connected to same ISP, or you are using some other complex
> configuration. I
> > would use interface IP connected to ISP to avoid routing issues
> etc.
> >
>     > Thanks.
>     >
>     > Ahsan Khan
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf Of Poh
> Yong Hwang
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:20 PM
> > To: Justin Fletcher
> > Cc: vyatta-users
> > Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks. I just could not traceroute to the router and according
> to my
> > peering upstream, they mention that they did not receive any of
> my p

Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2008-01-04 Thread Poh Yong Hwang
Hi all,

Sorry for getting back so late as I am tied up with some other stuffs..
Thanks for all the advice and my upstream managed to see my prefix. Seems
that changing the next hop to my eth0 public ip address did the trick.

Now as my eth0 is connected to my upstream, what IP address should I set on
my eth1? It will be connected to a layer 3 switch (core switch) which all
our servers will be connected to that switch. I have a /21 range of ip
addresses, so should I just use the first ip to set on eth1? What
prefix-length should I set on that as well?

Please advise.

Thanks!



On Dec 20, 2007 1:52 AM, Robyn Orosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi There,
>
> The next-hop value is providing the peer with the next-hop value to use
> for the advertised prefixes from your router.  So, the next-hop should
> be an address on your router.  It looks correct based on your edited
> configuration file.
>
> If you run a 'show bgp peers' it will show you whether or not your
> session is established with your peer.  If it's not established, that
> would be one reason why the ISP claims they did not receive a prefix
> advertisement from you.  First off, verify your configuration is correct
> (IPs, ASNs etc).  Then you can run a tshark on eth0 (your BGP peering
> interface) on port 179 (tshark -i eth0 port 179 -Vn) to take a look at
> the BGP packets and also take a look at the logs 'show log.'
>
> If your session is established, make sure the route you are advertising
> with your policy exists in the routing table and matches the prefix in
> the policy.  You can check the route by running a 'show route protocol
> static.'  You must see the static route that you've pointed to your
> loopback interface in the table.  If it's not there, verify your
> configuration etc.
>
> If it is there, make sure the prefix in your policy matches the route
> exactly.  If it does not match, it won't be advertised.
>
> If all of the above are correct, take a look at 'show bgp route' and
> make sure you see your advertised prefix in the output.  If it's there
> then your ISP is probably rejecting your advertisement.  They need to
> add your prefix to their prefix list.  ISPs forget to add their
> customer's prefixes to their prefix lists all the time.
>
> The loopback address for the BGP ID won't hurt anything but Ahsan is
> correct that for eBGP peering with external public peers, you should
> probably set your BGP ID to your public IP on eth0.
>
> Thanks!  and I hope this helps.
>
> -Robyn
>
> Ahsan Khan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >   I think your nexthop IP should be your ISP IP address and not your
> > own. Also check with your ISP if they can confirm about BGP session
> > establishment, Most router like Juniper, Cisco can explain a lot in
> their
> > output the reasons if the session is not established.
> >
> > Also loopback IP is normally used in BGP if you have multiple interfaces
> > connected to same ISP, or you are using some other complex
> configuration. I
> > would use interface IP connected to ISP to avoid routing issues etc.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Ahsan Khan
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Poh Yong
> Hwang
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:20 PM
> > To: Justin Fletcher
> > Cc: vyatta-users
> > Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks. I just could not traceroute to the router and according to my
> > peering upstream, they mention that they did not receive any of my
> prefix
> > announcement.
> >
> > Basically i just want to do a simple setup at this moment with one box
> > running Vyatta and eth0 is link to one of our upstream provider which we
> > want to peer with. I have my ASN number as well as a /21 range of IP
> > addresses to announce. Here is my configuration:
> >
> > loopback ip : 10.0.0.65
> > My ASN : 100
> > My IP Range : XX.XX.XX.XX/21
> >
> > Upstream Route IP : a.b.c.d
> > Customer Interface IP : c.d.e.f
> > Upstream ASN : 200
> >
> > protocols {
> > bgp {
> > bgp-id: 10.0.0.65
> > local-as: 100
> > import: ""
> > export: "BGP_EXPORT"
> > peer " a.b.c.d" {
> > import: ""
> > export: ""
> > multihop: 1
> > peer-port: 179
> > local-port: 179
> >   

Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2007-12-19 Thread Robyn Orosz
Hi There,

The next-hop value is providing the peer with the next-hop value to use 
for the advertised prefixes from your router.  So, the next-hop should 
be an address on your router.  It looks correct based on your edited 
configuration file.

If you run a 'show bgp peers' it will show you whether or not your 
session is established with your peer.  If it's not established, that 
would be one reason why the ISP claims they did not receive a prefix 
advertisement from you.  First off, verify your configuration is correct 
(IPs, ASNs etc).  Then you can run a tshark on eth0 (your BGP peering 
interface) on port 179 (tshark -i eth0 port 179 -Vn) to take a look at 
the BGP packets and also take a look at the logs 'show log.'

If your session is established, make sure the route you are advertising 
with your policy exists in the routing table and matches the prefix in 
the policy.  You can check the route by running a 'show route protocol 
static.'  You must see the static route that you've pointed to your 
loopback interface in the table.  If it's not there, verify your 
configuration etc.

If it is there, make sure the prefix in your policy matches the route 
exactly.  If it does not match, it won't be advertised.

If all of the above are correct, take a look at 'show bgp route' and 
make sure you see your advertised prefix in the output.  If it's there 
then your ISP is probably rejecting your advertisement.  They need to 
add your prefix to their prefix list.  ISPs forget to add their 
customer's prefixes to their prefix lists all the time. 

The loopback address for the BGP ID won't hurt anything but Ahsan is 
correct that for eBGP peering with external public peers, you should 
probably set your BGP ID to your public IP on eth0.

Thanks!  and I hope this helps.

-Robyn

Ahsan Khan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>   I think your nexthop IP should be your ISP IP address and not your
> own. Also check with your ISP if they can confirm about BGP session
> establishment, Most router like Juniper, Cisco can explain a lot in their
> output the reasons if the session is not established.
>
> Also loopback IP is normally used in BGP if you have multiple interfaces
> connected to same ISP, or you are using some other complex configuration. I
> would use interface IP connected to ISP to avoid routing issues etc.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ahsan Khan
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Poh Yong Hwang
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:20 PM
> To: Justin Fletcher
> Cc: vyatta-users
> Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks. I just could not traceroute to the router and according to my
> peering upstream, they mention that they did not receive any of my prefix
> announcement.
>
> Basically i just want to do a simple setup at this moment with one box
> running Vyatta and eth0 is link to one of our upstream provider which we
> want to peer with. I have my ASN number as well as a /21 range of IP
> addresses to announce. Here is my configuration:
>
> loopback ip : 10.0.0.65
> My ASN : 100
> My IP Range : XX.XX.XX.XX/21
>
> Upstream Route IP : a.b.c.d
> Customer Interface IP : c.d.e.f
> Upstream ASN : 200 
>
> protocols {
> bgp {
> bgp-id: 10.0.0.65
> local-as: 100
> import: ""
> export: "BGP_EXPORT"
> peer " a.b.c.d" {
> import: ""
> export: ""
> multihop: 1
> peer-port: 179
> local-port: 179
> local-ip: c.d.e.f
> as: 9989
> next-hop: c.d.e.f
> holdtime: 90
> delay-open-time: 0
> client: false
> confederation-member: false 
> disable: false
> ipv4-unicast: true
> ipv4-multicast: false
> ipv6-unicast: false
> ipv6-multicast: false
> md5-key: "" 
> }
> }
> static {
> disable: false
> route XX.XX.XX.XX/21 {
> next-hop: 10.0.0.65
> metric: 1
> }
> }
> }
> policy {
> policy-statement "BGP_EXPORT" {
> term 1 {
> from {
> protocol: "static"
> network4: XX.XX.XX.XX/21
> }
> then {
> action: "accept"
> }
> 

Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2007-12-18 Thread Ahsan Khan
Hi,

I think your nexthop IP should be your ISP IP address and not your
own. Also check with your ISP if they can confirm about BGP session
establishment, Most router like Juniper, Cisco can explain a lot in their
output the reasons if the session is not established.

Also loopback IP is normally used in BGP if you have multiple interfaces
connected to same ISP, or you are using some other complex configuration. I
would use interface IP connected to ISP to avoid routing issues etc.

Thanks.

Ahsan Khan


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Poh Yong Hwang
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:20 PM
To: Justin Fletcher
Cc: vyatta-users
Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

Hi,

Thanks. I just could not traceroute to the router and according to my
peering upstream, they mention that they did not receive any of my prefix
announcement.

Basically i just want to do a simple setup at this moment with one box
running Vyatta and eth0 is link to one of our upstream provider which we
want to peer with. I have my ASN number as well as a /21 range of IP
addresses to announce. Here is my configuration:

loopback ip : 10.0.0.65
My ASN : 100
My IP Range : XX.XX.XX.XX/21

Upstream Route IP : a.b.c.d
Customer Interface IP : c.d.e.f
Upstream ASN : 200 

protocols {
bgp {
bgp-id: 10.0.0.65
local-as: 100
import: ""
export: "BGP_EXPORT"
peer " a.b.c.d" {
import: ""
export: ""
multihop: 1
peer-port: 179
local-port: 179
local-ip: c.d.e.f
as: 9989
next-hop: c.d.e.f
holdtime: 90
delay-open-time: 0
client: false
confederation-member: false 
disable: false
ipv4-unicast: true
ipv4-multicast: false
ipv6-unicast: false
ipv6-multicast: false
md5-key: "" 
}
}
static {
disable: false
route XX.XX.XX.XX/21 {
next-hop: 10.0.0.65
metric: 1
}
}
}
policy {
policy-statement "BGP_EXPORT" {
term 1 {
from {
protocol: "static"
network4: XX.XX.XX.XX/21
}
then {
action: "accept"
}
}
}
}
interfaces {
restore: false
loopback lo {
description: ""
address 10.0.0.65 {
prefix-length: 32
disable: false
}
} 
ethernet eth0 {
disable: false
discard: false
description: ""
hw-id: 00:30:48:55:63:FC
duplex: "auto"
speed: "auto" 
address c.d.e.f {
prefix-length: 25
disable: false
}
}
ethernet eth1 {
disable: false
discard: false 
description: ""
hw-id: 00:30:48:55:63:FD
duplex: "auto"
speed: "auto"
address XX.XX.XX.1 {
prefix-length: 21 
disable: false
}
}
}
service {
http {
port: 80
}
}
firewall {
log-martians: "enable"
send-redirects: "disable" 
receive-redirects: "disable"
ip-src-route: "disable"
broadcast-ping: "disable"
syn-cookies: "enable"
}
system {
host-name: "vyatta" 
domain-name: ""
time-zone: "GMT"
ntp-server "69.59.150.135"
login {
user root {
full-name: "" 
authentication {
encrypted-password: "$1$$Ht7gBYnxI1xCdO/JOnodh."
}
}
user vyatta {
full-name: "" 
authentication {
encrypted-password: "$1$$Ht7gBYnxI1xCdO/JOnodh."
}
}
}
package {
auto-sync: 1
repository community {
component: "main"
url: "http://archive.vyatta.com/vyatta";
}
} 
}
rtrmgr {
config-directory: "/opt/vyatta/etc/config"
}

Is this config correct?

Thanks
 


On Dec 18, 2007 3:17 AM, Justin Fletcher < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 

Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2007-12-18 Thread Poh Yong Hwang
Hi,

Thanks. I just could not traceroute to the router and according to my
peering upstream, they mention that they did not receive any of my prefix
announcement.

Basically i just want to do a simple setup at this moment with one box
running Vyatta and eth0 is link to one of our upstream provider which we
want to peer with. I have my ASN number as well as a /21 range of IP
addresses to announce. Here is my configuration:

loopback ip : 10.0.0.65
My ASN : 100
My IP Range : XX.XX.XX.XX/21

Upstream Route IP : a.b.c.d
Customer Interface IP : c.d.e.f
Upstream ASN : 200

protocols {
bgp {
bgp-id: 10.0.0.65
local-as: 100
import: ""
export: "BGP_EXPORT"
peer "a.b.c.d" {
import: ""
export: ""
multihop: 1
peer-port: 179
local-port: 179
local-ip: c.d.e.f
as: 9989
next-hop: c.d.e.f
holdtime: 90
delay-open-time: 0
client: false
confederation-member: false
disable: false
ipv4-unicast: true
ipv4-multicast: false
ipv6-unicast: false
ipv6-multicast: false
md5-key: ""
}
}
static {
disable: false
route XX.XX.XX.XX/21 {
next-hop: 10.0.0.65
metric: 1
}
}
}
policy {
policy-statement "BGP_EXPORT" {
term 1 {
from {
protocol: "static"
network4: XX.XX.XX.XX/21
}
then {
action: "accept"
}
}
}
}
interfaces {
restore: false
loopback lo {
description: ""
address 10.0.0.65 {
prefix-length: 32
disable: false
}
}
ethernet eth0 {
disable: false
discard: false
description: ""
hw-id: 00:30:48:55:63:FC
duplex: "auto"
speed: "auto"
address c.d.e.f {
prefix-length: 25
disable: false
}
}
ethernet eth1 {
disable: false
discard: false
description: ""
hw-id: 00:30:48:55:63:FD
duplex: "auto"
speed: "auto"
address XX.XX.XX.1 {
prefix-length: 21
disable: false
}
}
}
service {
http {
port: 80
}
}
firewall {
log-martians: "enable"
send-redirects: "disable"
receive-redirects: "disable"
ip-src-route: "disable"
broadcast-ping: "disable"
syn-cookies: "enable"
}
system {
host-name: "vyatta"
domain-name: ""
time-zone: "GMT"
ntp-server "69.59.150.135"
login {
user root {
full-name: ""
authentication {
encrypted-password: "$1$$Ht7gBYnxI1xCdO/JOnodh."
}
}
user vyatta {
full-name: ""
authentication {
encrypted-password: "$1$$Ht7gBYnxI1xCdO/JOnodh."
}
}
}
package {
auto-sync: 1
repository community {
component: "main"
url: "http://archive.vyatta.com/vyatta";
}
}
}
rtrmgr {
config-directory: "/opt/vyatta/etc/config"
}

Is this config correct?

Thanks


On Dec 18, 2007 3:17 AM, Justin Fletcher < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It's hard to tell without the full configuration, but remember that you
> need
> both a route out, as well as the rest of the internet needs to be able to
> find their way back to you.  You can check to see if you're reachable
> using an external traceroute; see www.traceroute.org to check and see
> if you're reachable.
>
> Best,
> Justin
>
> On Dec 17, 2007 2:05 AM, Poh Yong Hwang < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have managed to setup the BGP session with my peer and also based on
> the
> > topic on Originating a Route to eBGP neighbors to announce my IP ranges.
>  I
> > have set my eth1 ip to be XX.XX.XX.1/21 and connect one server directly
> to
> > eth1 for testing. Setting XX.XX.XX.2 with subnet of 255.255.248.0 and
> > XX.XX.XX.1 for default gateway on the server itself, I cannot go out of
> the
> > internet (Cannot surf net using that server). Eth0 is link with the UTP
> > cable provided by upstream for peering
> >
> > Is this the correct way to set it up?
> >
> > Please advise
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Regards
> > Yongsan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 14, 2007 12:24 PM, Poh Yong Hwang < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 

Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2007-12-17 Thread Justin Fletcher
It's hard to tell without the full configuration, but remember that you need
both a route out, as well as the rest of the internet needs to be able to
find their way back to you.  You can check to see if you're reachable
using an external traceroute; see www.traceroute.org to check and see
if you're reachable.

Best,
Justin

On Dec 17, 2007 2:05 AM, Poh Yong Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have managed to setup the BGP session with my peer and also based on the
> topic on Originating a Route to eBGP neighbors to announce my IP ranges.  I
> have set my eth1 ip to be XX.XX.XX.1/21 and connect one server directly to
> eth1 for testing. Setting XX.XX.XX.2 with subnet of 255.255.248.0 and
> XX.XX.XX.1 for default gateway on the server itself, I cannot go out of the
> internet (Cannot surf net using that server). Eth0 is link with the UTP
> cable provided by upstream for peering
>
> Is this the correct way to set it up?
>
> Please advise
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards
> Yongsan
>
>
>
> On Dec 14, 2007 12:24 PM, Poh Yong Hwang < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have read the docs that was available but still have a few questions in
> mind. I have a UTP cable that was provided by the provider that I would like
> to peer with so I have plug it into my eth0. So what IP address should I set
> on my eth0? Where can I set the IP range XX.XX.XX.XX/21 that I want to
> announce?
> >
> > Please advise.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Yongsan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 12, 2007 12:03 AM, Justin Fletcher < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > > Certainly; there's documentation with examples from
> > > http://www.vyatta.com/documentation/index.php or
> > > http://www.vyatta.com/twiki/bin/view/Community/DocumentationSet.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Justin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 10, 2007 8:18 PM, Poh Yong Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks! I am a noob in setting up BGP and we have the following info
> from
> > > > our upstream provider
> > > >
> > > > Upstream Router Server IP Address
> > > > Customer Primary Interface Address
> > > > Upstream Secondary Router Server IP Address
> > > > Customer Secondary Interface Address
> > > >
> > > > Plus my ASN number as well as my IP range XX.XX.XX.XX/21
> > > >
> > > > So is all these information be enough to configure it? Is there any
> examples
> > > > I can follow?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Yongsan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 11, 2007 11:33 AM, Justin Fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Well, yes - Vyatta has full BGP support, so you'll be able to peer
> > > > > with your provider.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Justin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Dec 10, 2007 7:26 PM, Poh Yong Hwang < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > New here and to Vynatta and hope to get advises on getting this
> up. I
> > > > wish
> > > > > > to setup a BGP router for our current setup (We have got our ASN
> number,
> > > > IP
> > > > > > range) and we will peer with our upstream provider for MLPA.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just some simple BGP routes for testing purposes. So just
> wondering if
> > > > > > Vynatta is able to do that?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yongsan
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ___
> > > > > > Vyatta-users mailing list
> > > > > > Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
> > > > > > http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
___
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users


Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2007-12-17 Thread Poh Yong Hwang
Hi,

I have managed to setup the BGP session with my peer and also based on the
topic on Originating a Route to eBGP neighbors to announce my IP ranges.  I
have set my eth1 ip to be XX.XX.XX.1/21 and connect one server directly to
eth1 for testing. Setting XX.XX.XX.2 with subnet of 255.255.248.0 and
XX.XX.XX.1 for default gateway on the server itself, I cannot go out of the
internet (Cannot surf net using that server). Eth0 is link with the UTP
cable provided by upstream for peering

Is this the correct way to set it up?

Please advise

Thanks

Regards
Yongsan

On Dec 14, 2007 12:24 PM, Poh Yong Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have read the docs that was available but still have a few questions in
> mind. I have a UTP cable that was provided by the provider that I would like
> to peer with so I have plug it into my eth0. So what IP address should I set
> on my eth0? Where can I set the IP range XX.XX.XX.XX/21 that I want to
> announce?
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Yongsan
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2007 12:03 AM, Justin Fletcher < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> > Certainly; there's documentation with examples from
> > http://www.vyatta.com/documentation/index.php or
> > http://www.vyatta.com/twiki/bin/view/Community/DocumentationSet.
> >
> > Best,
> > Justin
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2007 8:18 PM, Poh Yong Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks! I am a noob in setting up BGP and we have the following info
> > from
> > > our upstream provider
> > >
> > > Upstream Router Server IP Address
> > > Customer Primary Interface Address
> > > Upstream Secondary Router Server IP Address
> > > Customer Secondary Interface Address
> > >
> > > Plus my ASN number as well as my IP range XX.XX.XX.XX/21
> > >
> > > So is all these information be enough to configure it? Is there any
> > examples
> > > I can follow?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Yongsan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 11, 2007 11:33 AM, Justin Fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Well, yes - Vyatta has full BGP support, so you'll be able to peer
> > > > with your provider.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Justin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 10, 2007 7:26 PM, Poh Yong Hwang < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > New here and to Vynatta and hope to get advises on getting this
> > up. I
> > > wish
> > > > > to setup a BGP router for our current setup (We have got our ASN
> > number,
> > > IP
> > > > > range) and we will peer with our upstream provider for MLPA.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just some simple BGP routes for testing purposes. So just
> > wondering if
> > > > > Vynatta is able to do that?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > Yongsan
> > > > >
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Vyatta-users mailing list
> > > > > Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
> > > > > http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
___
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users


Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2007-12-13 Thread Poh Yong Hwang
Hi,

I have read the docs that was available but still have a few questions in
mind. I have a UTP cable that was provided by the provider that I would like
to peer with so I have plug it into my eth0. So what IP address should I set
on my eth0? Where can I set the IP range XX.XX.XX.XX/21 that I want to
announce?

Please advise.

Thanks!

Yongsan

On Dec 12, 2007 12:03 AM, Justin Fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Certainly; there's documentation with examples from
> http://www.vyatta.com/documentation/index.php or
> http://www.vyatta.com/twiki/bin/view/Community/DocumentationSet.
>
> Best,
> Justin
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 8:18 PM, Poh Yong Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks! I am a noob in setting up BGP and we have the following info
> from
> > our upstream provider
> >
> > Upstream Router Server IP Address
> > Customer Primary Interface Address
> > Upstream Secondary Router Server IP Address
> > Customer Secondary Interface Address
> >
> > Plus my ASN number as well as my IP range XX.XX.XX.XX/21
> >
> > So is all these information be enough to configure it? Is there any
> examples
> > I can follow?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Yongsan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2007 11:33 AM, Justin Fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well, yes - Vyatta has full BGP support, so you'll be able to peer
> > > with your provider.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Justin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 10, 2007 7:26 PM, Poh Yong Hwang < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > New here and to Vynatta and hope to get advises on getting this up.
> I
> > wish
> > > > to setup a BGP router for our current setup (We have got our ASN
> number,
> > IP
> > > > range) and we will peer with our upstream provider for MLPA.
> > > >
> > > > Just some simple BGP routes for testing purposes. So just wondering
> if
> > > > Vynatta is able to do that?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Yongsan
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Vyatta-users mailing list
> > > > Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
> > > > http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
___
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users


Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2007-12-11 Thread Justin Fletcher
Certainly; there's documentation with examples from
http://www.vyatta.com/documentation/index.php or
http://www.vyatta.com/twiki/bin/view/Community/DocumentationSet.

Best,
Justin

On Dec 10, 2007 8:18 PM, Poh Yong Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks! I am a noob in setting up BGP and we have the following info from
> our upstream provider
>
> Upstream Router Server IP Address
> Customer Primary Interface Address
> Upstream Secondary Router Server IP Address
> Customer Secondary Interface Address
>
> Plus my ASN number as well as my IP range XX.XX.XX.XX/21
>
> So is all these information be enough to configure it? Is there any examples
> I can follow?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Yongsan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 11, 2007 11:33 AM, Justin Fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, yes - Vyatta has full BGP support, so you'll be able to peer
> > with your provider.
> >
> > Best,
> > Justin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2007 7:26 PM, Poh Yong Hwang < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > New here and to Vynatta and hope to get advises on getting this up. I
> wish
> > > to setup a BGP router for our current setup (We have got our ASN number,
> IP
> > > range) and we will peer with our upstream provider for MLPA.
> > >
> > > Just some simple BGP routes for testing purposes. So just wondering if
> > > Vynatta is able to do that?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Yongsan
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Vyatta-users mailing list
> > > Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
> > > http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
___
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users


Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2007-12-10 Thread Poh Yong Hwang
Hi,

Thanks! I am a noob in setting up BGP and we have the following info from
our upstream provider

Upstream Router Server IP Address
Customer Primary Interface Address
Upstream Secondary Router Server IP Address
Customer Secondary Interface Address

Plus my ASN number as well as my IP range XX.XX.XX.XX/21

So is all these information be enough to configure it? Is there any examples
I can follow?

Thanks!

Yongsan



On Dec 11, 2007 11:33 AM, Justin Fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Well, yes - Vyatta has full BGP support, so you'll be able to peer
> with your provider.
>
> Best,
> Justin
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 7:26 PM, Poh Yong Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > New here and to Vynatta and hope to get advises on getting this up. I
> wish
> > to setup a BGP router for our current setup (We have got our ASN number,
> IP
> > range) and we will peer with our upstream provider for MLPA.
> >
> > Just some simple BGP routes for testing purposes. So just wondering if
> > Vynatta is able to do that?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Yongsan
> >
> > ___
> > Vyatta-users mailing list
> > Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
> > http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users
> >
> >
>
___
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users


Re: [Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2007-12-10 Thread Justin Fletcher
Well, yes - Vyatta has full BGP support, so you'll be able to peer
with your provider.

Best,
Justin

On Dec 10, 2007 7:26 PM, Poh Yong Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> New here and to Vynatta and hope to get advises on getting this up. I wish
> to setup a BGP router for our current setup (We have got our ASN number, IP
> range) and we will peer with our upstream provider for MLPA.
>
> Just some simple BGP routes for testing purposes. So just wondering if
> Vynatta is able to do that?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Yongsan
>
> ___
> Vyatta-users mailing list
> Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
> http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users
>
>
___
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users


[Vyatta-users] Advises on configuring BGP

2007-12-10 Thread Poh Yong Hwang
Hi,

New here and to Vynatta and hope to get advises on getting this up. I wish
to setup a BGP router for our current setup (We have got our ASN number, IP
range) and we will peer with our upstream provider for MLPA.

Just some simple BGP routes for testing purposes. So just wondering if
Vynatta is able to do that?

Thanks!

Yongsan
___
Vyatta-users mailing list
Vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com
http://mailman.vyatta.com/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-users