Re: [web2py] I just discovered this
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 8:41 AM, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: http://reia-lang.org/ Sweet! -- Branko Vukelic stu...@brankovukelic.com http://www.brankovukelic.com/
Re: [web2py] Re: The stability of web2py releases
+1 On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Luis Díaz diazluis2...@gmail.com wrote: +1 2010/12/24 ron_m ron.mco...@gmail.com I for one am happy with the current release cycle. It is a good balance between new features and the ultimate stability of release 1.XX.N where N is the last version before XX+1 for example. The nightly build is a bit of a misnomer, many projects (C or C++ mostly) have some automated process that takes trunk and compiles it to produce a .tar.gz labelled nightly which might work. For web2py we should just hg pull; hg update to achieve that result. The nightly for web2py is more like a beta because Massimo hand picks code from trunk that will or will not be in the nightly which could really be a weekly. I am currently developing the application I am working on and testing is easy enough that I test trunk at least daily. The web2py server is quite easy to use but the code in some places is complicated and has many possible use cases. It is only through exposure out to the user base that a large number of use cases of the code get tested. I have even seen problems reported where something was fixed but used by maybe one person in a way that should not have worked resulting in the dreaded bug that worked and became a useful feature for someone. Once I go to production I will probably move the releases a lot slower through the installed base. In fact I have 2 beta production systems up now and only push a new web2py when I push a new version of the application to the stakeholders to look at. Massimo provides a fantastic service with the web2py project and I would not like to see him stifled by a load of process. Anyone that has time to test will definitely help the quality, if you don't have time, that is okay too. I personally don't mind doing some release management between where Massimo is burning the midnight oil and what I let out into the production systems I have/will manage. The product is alive with new features and bug fixes sometimes occur in minutes once reported. That is worth a lot. Ron -- Díaz Luis TSU Analisis de Sistemas Universidad de Carabobo http://web2pyfacil.blogspot.com/ Facultad de Odontología -- Branko Vukelic stu...@brankovukelic.com http://www.brankovukelic.com/
[web2py] Re: GAE shows problem.
Thank you for suggestion. It worked in 1.89.x. But problem is resolved now. And for the benefit of others, I get past it by running *dev_appserver.py*with *-c* option. So, the data already there may be caused problem. I changed DB a little bit. -c option clears datastore.
Re: [web2py] Url variable's problem
Can you point me on how to run a controller in web2py shell. Or in that matter how to debug a web2py controller or view?
[web2py] Re: App admin error
Oh, I forgot that I've a plug-gin(SQLite Manager) installed in my FF. I tried that too, but in vein. There's no problem at all. Am I correctly assuming that list reference field get represented as TEXT in SQLite. Data is in format like |5| . so it's correct. Problem is somewhere else. May be in DAL !!
Re: [web2py] Re: The stability of web2py releases
Merry christmas to the whole list. I think this has been suggested earlier but thought I´d bring it up again. I have two instances of web2py via wsgi and Apache running on my server. One reason is the possibility to upgrade my development side everytime I log in to admin, that way getting all new features and testing at the same time. Would it be possible to get two upgrade buttons in admin, one for stable and one for the latest release. Lot of the time there their the same. Maybe a third button for trunk, if that is possible. Is there instructions how to use the hg stuff to use the trunk. Could not find the hg command in the book? Kenneth +1 On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Luis Díazdiazluis2...@gmail.com wrote: +1 2010/12/24 ron_mron.mco...@gmail.com I for one am happy with the current release cycle. It is a good balance between new features and the ultimate stability of release 1.XX.N where N is the last version before XX+1 for example. The nightly build is a bit of a misnomer, many projects (C or C++ mostly) have some automated process that takes trunk and compiles it to produce a .tar.gz labelled nightly which might work. For web2py we should just hg pull; hg update to achieve that result. The nightly for web2py is more like a beta because Massimo hand picks code from trunk that will or will not be in the nightly which could really be a weekly. I am currently developing the application I am working on and testing is easy enough that I test trunk at least daily. The web2py server is quite easy to use but the code in some places is complicated and has many possible use cases. It is only through exposure out to the user base that a large number of use cases of the code get tested. I have even seen problems reported where something was fixed but used by maybe one person in a way that should not have worked resulting in the dreaded bug that worked and became a useful feature for someone. Once I go to production I will probably move the releases a lot slower through the installed base. In fact I have 2 beta production systems up now and only push a new web2py when I push a new version of the application to the stakeholders to look at. Massimo provides a fantastic service with the web2py project and I would not like to see him stifled by a load of process. Anyone that has time to test will definitely help the quality, if you don't have time, that is okay too. I personally don't mind doing some release management between where Massimo is burning the midnight oil and what I let out into the production systems I have/will manage. The product is alive with new features and bug fixes sometimes occur in minutes once reported. That is worth a lot. Ron -- Díaz Luis TSU Analisis de Sistemas Universidad de Carabobo http://web2pyfacil.blogspot.com/ Facultad de Odontología
Re: [web2py] Re: The stability of web2py releases
2010/12/24 Kenneth Lundström kenneth.t.lundst...@gmail.com: Is there instructions how to use the hg stuff to use the trunk. Could not find the hg command in the book? Look here: http://code.google.com/p/web2py/source/checkout I think the double-update button is a good idea. I was going to suggest/implement the same thing. I haven't looked yet at how the update works server-side. Will look as soon as I have more time. @Massimo, what do you think about cloning the project to Bitbucket? https://bitbucket.org/ -- Branko Vukelic stu...@brankovukelic.com http://www.brankovukelic.com/
[web2py] Bug in SQLFORM.factory in version 1.91.4?
I've been working with web2py for a while. Lastnight I updated to last
version, and my webforms just collapsed (sorry for my poor english).
Anyway. After some minutes searching for the cause of the problem,
I've decided to start from scratch with an example. I downloaded the
version 1.91.4 (I'm using Ubuntu 10.04). I created a new application.
The model (very simple, I took it from web2py examples):
--
db.define_table('person',
Field('name'))
db.define_table('dog',
Field('name'),
Field('owner', db.person))
--
Then, I wrote the index function on default.py controller:
--
def index():
form = SQLFORM.factory(db.dog)
if form.accepts(request.vars, keepvalues=True):
response.flash = 'New dog inserted'
dogs = db(db.dog.id0).select()
return dict(form=form, dogs=dogs)
--
In the view I just added {{=form}} and {{=BEAUTIFY(dogs)}}, just to
see the result of the function.
When I try to run the function, I receive the following error:
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/gluon/restricted.py, line 188, in
restricted
exec ccode in environment
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/applications/prueba/controllers/
default.py, line 20, in module
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/gluon/globals.py, line 95, in
lambda
self._caller = lambda f: f()
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/applications/prueba/controllers/
default.py, line 14, in index
form = SQLFORM.factory(db.dog)
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/gluon/sqlhtml.py, line 1182, in
factory
return SQLFORM(SQLDB(None).define_table(table_name, *fields),
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/gluon/dal.py, line 3314, in
define_table
t._create_references()
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/gluon/dal.py, line 3607, in
_create_references
rtable = self._db[rtablename]
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/gluon/dal.py, line 3335, in
__getitem__
return dict.__getitem__(self, str(key))
KeyError: 'person'
--
The SAME code, but using SQLFORM(db.dog) instead of
SQLFORM.factory(db.dog), works just fine.
The SAME code, but with an older version of web2py, works just fine.
What happened to SQLFORM.factory? Some bug? Or it's just me that I'm
doing something wrong?
Thanks in advance.
[web2py] Re: try web2py with cherrypy, diesel, eventlet, fapws,flup, gnuicorn, paste, rocket, tornado, twisted, wsgiref
Bjoern: a screamingly fast Python WSGI server written in C https://github.com/jonashaag/bjoern
[web2py] application: web2py in app.yaml
Use: web2py: 1.91.4 GoogleAppEngine: 1.4.0 - 2010-12-02 WinXP web2py runs through GAE without problems But when I change the name of the application in app.yaml (ex: 1line: application: my_web2py) I get error: Internal error Ticket issued: unrecoverable
[web2py] Re: Great summary of web2py
Yes Michele, +1 to web pages! I often see frameworks being compared in threaded discussions. That's such a waste of time when a simple reference to a webpage could tell a much better and more complete story. It is a shame that when some newbie enters a search like 'web2py vs django|flask|rails' they might so easily find some long argumentative thread peppered with expletives with someone unfairly ranting about something Massimo said in 2007. This was certainly my initial experience and I can say it was quite off-putting. We could then collectively always reference these pages in other threads. The backlinks would really boost the SEO and the inevitable scrutiny of devotees of other frameworks would help us keep the pages accurate and fair. -David On Dec 23, 11:55 pm, Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe we should keep a comparison just on web2py.com. Pay attention to framework lists around and putting a sane description there. It is useless and even counterproductive starting flame wars in threaded discussions. It is more importante that googlers find web2py when they search a good framework to work with. 2010/12/24 JmiXIII sylvn.p...@gmail.com: Just to give a pleased newbie feed-back : _I'm newbie to web2py (well a couple of month) _I've never studied informatics nor did I have an informatic job BUT I needed something to handle database easely + human interface + network for my job I tried a crack access = beurk = begin to learn python I tried Zope/Plone = too heavy I tried Django = not enough efficient for what I wanted THEN I've seen some comparaison made by Massimo between Django and web2py 'do not remember the url) AND This is these comparisons which decided me to try web2py I'm very pleased because it is so efficient you are right VP , it's a waste of time to fuel the fire. But a short comparison would help newbies to make their choice and choose to try web2py. Yet I'm speaking of comparison showing the efficientness of web2py not long long debates/war. On 23 déc, 23:51, VP vtp2...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 23, 3:44 am, Branko Vukelić stu...@brankovukelic.com wrote: Or am I missing something? In the summary, also no mention of Django or Flask. My comment is not just about that specific thread of discussion, but about a general PR strategy of web2py. My suggestion to Massimo still stands. Forget about Flask and Django !!! Don't talk about them at all. None. Nothing. People who think that Django/Flask are superior to web2py, and/or web2py is deeply flawed, aren't changing their minds. There's no point to debate, justify, etc. I do not see much benefit for web2py when Massimo discusses Django/ Flask. On the other hand, the (serious) newbies will get lost in hot exchanges between the web2py folks and the Django/Flask folks. Occasionally, this dude Armin will come around the proclaim web2py to be the worst thing there is. And my suggestion to Massimo is that he will have to live with that, and instead of spending energy to justify him, turn that energy into making web2py to be a great platform. Specifically, to attract newbies, I would recommend making Chapter 3 of the book to be better than it currently is. Right now, it's very good. But I think there are places that can be improved. This chapter is where web2py can be/should be showcased to attract the newbies. This comes from my experience when I first learned about web2py.
Re: [web2py] Re: Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all on the group. This is one of the most active groups I am on, thanks for the excellent support. rAm i Think, i Wait, i Fast -- Siddhartha http://sodidi.ramjeeganti.com On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Kostas M kmo...@hotmail.com wrote: def best_wishes(web2py): for i in web2py.users: print Dear %s I wish you Merry Christmas \ and a Happy New Year!! % i
Re: [web2py] Url variable's problem
After a bit of trail and error through session.flash
I changed following
indx = dict(indx = search_form.vars.indx)
redirect(URL(r=request, f='search', args=[lang, word], vars=indx))
to
redirect(URL(r=request, f='search', args=[lang, word],
vars={'indx':search_form.vars.indx}))
seems working now. (On Linux, previously was on windows)
But what was wrong with first approach!!!
[web2py] Re: Url variable's problem
They are equivalent.
BTW. make it shorter:
redirect(URL('search',args=[lang,
word],vars={'indx':search_form.vars.indx}))
On Dec 24, 10:04 am, Arun K.Rajeevan the1.a...@gmail.com wrote:
After a bit of trail and error through session.flash
I changed following
indx = dict(indx = search_form.vars.indx)
redirect(URL(r=request, f='search', args=[lang, word], vars=indx))
to
redirect(URL(r=request, f='search', args=[lang, word],
vars={'indx':search_form.vars.indx}))
seems working now. (On Linux, previously was on windows)
But what was wrong with first approach!!!
[web2py] Re: Url variable's problem
I know, that's why I wondered, why did it produced such a weired url at first place.
[web2py] Re: application: web2py in app.yaml
The name in app.yaml should be the application id that you registered with google. On Dec 24, 2:36 am, Belov I belo...@gmail.com wrote: Use: web2py: 1.91.4 GoogleAppEngine: 1.4.0 - 2010-12-02 WinXP web2py runs through GAE without problems But when I change the name of the application in app.yaml (ex: 1line: application: my_web2py) I get error: Internal error Ticket issued: unrecoverable
[web2py] Re: Bug in SQLFORM.factory in version 1.91.4?
Believe this is fixed in trunk. Did you try that. If so I will post to
stable soon.
On Dec 24, 6:24 am, Lisandro rostagnolisan...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been working with web2py for a while. Lastnight I updated to last
version, and my webforms just collapsed (sorry for my poor english).
Anyway. After some minutes searching for the cause of the problem,
I've decided to start from scratch with an example. I downloaded the
version 1.91.4 (I'm using Ubuntu 10.04). I created a new application.
The model (very simple, I took it from web2py examples):
--
db.define_table('person',
Field('name'))
db.define_table('dog',
Field('name'),
Field('owner', db.person))
--
Then, I wrote the index function on default.py controller:
--
def index():
form = SQLFORM.factory(db.dog)
if form.accepts(request.vars, keepvalues=True):
response.flash = 'New dog inserted'
dogs = db(db.dog.id0).select()
return dict(form=form, dogs=dogs)
--
In the view I just added {{=form}} and {{=BEAUTIFY(dogs)}}, just to
see the result of the function.
When I try to run the function, I receive the following error:
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/gluon/restricted.py, line 188, in
restricted
exec ccode in environment
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/applications/prueba/controllers/
default.py, line 20, in module
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/gluon/globals.py, line 95, in
lambda
self._caller = lambda f: f()
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/applications/prueba/controllers/
default.py, line 14, in index
form = SQLFORM.factory(db.dog)
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/gluon/sqlhtml.py, line 1182, in
factory
return SQLFORM(SQLDB(None).define_table(table_name, *fields),
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/gluon/dal.py, line 3314, in
define_table
t._create_references()
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/gluon/dal.py, line 3607, in
_create_references
rtable = self._db[rtablename]
File /home/lisandro/pylicencias/gluon/dal.py, line 3335, in
__getitem__
return dict.__getitem__(self, str(key))
KeyError: 'person'
--
The SAME code, but using SQLFORM(db.dog) instead of
SQLFORM.factory(db.dog), works just fine.
The SAME code, but with an older version of web2py, works just fine.
What happened to SQLFORM.factory? Some bug? Or it's just me that I'm
doing something wrong?
Thanks in advance.
Re: [web2py] Url variable's problem
On Dec 24, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Arun K.Rajeevan wrote:
After a bit of trail and error through session.flash
I changed following
indx = dict(indx = search_form.vars.indx)
redirect(URL(r=request, f='search', args=[lang, word], vars=indx))
to
redirect(URL(r=request, f='search', args=[lang, word],
vars={'indx':search_form.vars.indx}))
seems working now. (On Linux, previously was on windows)
But what was wrong with first approach!!!
As Massimo says, they look identical. Could you try switching it back and see
what happens? I'm guessing that it was some other change, that fixed the
problem, perhaps involving JavaScript. (Unless the switch from Windows to Linux
is relevant; that would be interesting.)
[web2py] Re: application: web2py in app.yaml
Problem solved. It is necessary to restart the GAE On 24 дек, 16:36, Belov I belo...@gmail.com wrote: Use: web2py: 1.91.4 GoogleAppEngine: 1.4.0 - 2010-12-02 WinXP web2py runs through GAE without problems But when I change the name of the application in app.yaml (ex: 1line: application: my_web2py) I get error: Internal error Ticket issued: unrecoverable
[web2py] Re: App admin error
This was a nasty one. It is not fixed in trunk. The problem anyway was not with new dal but preexisting. Somehow it was not caught before. Please check and let us know if it works for you. On Dec 24, 3:53 am, Arun K.Rajeevan the1.a...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, I forgot that I've a plug-gin(SQLite Manager) installed in my FF. I tried that too, but in vein. There's no problem at all. Am I correctly assuming that list reference field get represented as TEXT in SQLite. Data is in format like |5| . so it's correct. Problem is somewhere else. May be in DAL !!
Re: [web2py] Re: App admin error
On Dec 24, 2010, at 8:55 AM, mdipierro wrote: This was a nasty one. It is not fixed in trunk. now fixed in trunk The problem anyway was not with new dal but preexisting. Somehow it was not caught before. Please check and let us know if it works for you. On Dec 24, 3:53 am, Arun K.Rajeevan the1.a...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, I forgot that I've a plug-gin(SQLite Manager) installed in my FF. I tried that too, but in vein. There's no problem at all. Am I correctly assuming that list reference field get represented as TEXT in SQLite. Data is in format like |5| . so it's correct. Problem is somewhere else. May be in DAL !!
[web2py] Re: form.accepts = False. How to find out why
On Dec 24, 2:21 am, Johann Spies johann.sp...@gmail.com wrote:
I have it working now and it seems that the main thing I have changed to
make it work was to change the name of the field (from 'id' to something
else). I did not check afterwards in the documentation but I suspect that
SQLFORM.factory uses an 'id' field (hidden).
Makes sense since the handling of 'id' is special but only a trace
will tell us why.
There is no hidden 'id' field in SQLFORM.factory
What I could not understand was that when I the normal crud form in the html
there were two identical fields('id') although I had only one in my
definition. Changing the name of the field corrected that and the
redirection took place as expected.
What crud?.
Regards
Johann
[web2py] Is this broken?
See following form
search_form = FORM http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/FORM(LABEL
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/LABEL('Search a word: ',
_for='word', _id='word_label', _name='word_label'),
INPUT
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/INPUT(_id='word', _name='word',
requires=IS_NOT_EMPTY
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_NOT_EMPTY()),
SELECT
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/SELECT(_name='languages',
_id='languages', requires=IS_IN_DB
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_IN_DB(db,'languages.id'),
*options_added),
INPUT
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/INPUT(_type=submit,_value=SEARCH),
_name='search_form')
I used to do something like search_form[2][3]['_selected']=True
But now with 1.91.x this shows an error (Assignment with NoneType or something
similar)
What happened?
[web2py] Re: ajax polling with web2py
Yes, I do have an ajax generated by code inside another ajax. But I'm not married to that approach, especially if it doesn't work. I'm just looking for anything that works -- doesn't have to be pretty. Bottom line, we need a general solution to this problem. User clicks an ajax-ified widget/link/whatever. This generates a job-queue entry and a callback. Callback checks status of job and returns one of two responses. If job finished, returns final view. If job not finished, returns wait message and ajax countdown to check queue status again after prescribed time period. I've cracked my skull on this problem now on two different occasions over the last 3 months. On many attempts, I feel like I've gotten close, but in the end have made zero progress. As I said, this is mission critical to my app, so any help is much appreciated. On Dec 24, 2:22 am, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: Do you have an ajax generated by code inside another ajax request? I believe SCRIPT(...) is returned but never executed for the same reason as in your code at the beginning of the thread: script.../ script inside ajax content are ignored by the browser. On Dec 24, 12:16 am, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: Problem with my example above is that the setInterval is not being executed after the callback.
Re: [web2py] Url variable's problem
Nothing else is changed AFAIK. some magic may be. (it's X'mas :D)
[web2py] question about ajax(...); return false;
Should one's view *always* have a return false; statement immediately after an ajax request? Why?
[web2py] Re: Custom form
*I'll be more than happy, if I can go with a custom form.* *Only thing that I don't know in that case, is how to deal with upload field and make it into db.*
[web2py] Re: Merry Christmas
@Kostas -- LOL, very cute. Happy holidays, everyone! +1 to all the other posts, too. On Dec 24, 9:11 am, Ramjee Ganti gant...@gmail.com wrote: Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all on the group. This is one of the most active groups I am on, thanks for the excellent support. rAm i Think, i Wait, i Fast -- Siddharthahttp://sodidi.ramjeeganti.com On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Kostas M kmo...@hotmail.com wrote: def best_wishes(web2py): for i in web2py.users: print Dear %s I wish you Merry Christmas \ and a Happy New Year!! % i
Re: [web2py] Re: form.accepts = False. How to find out why
On Dec 24, 2010, at 9:19 AM, DenesL wrote:
On Dec 24, 2:21 am, Johann Spies johann.sp...@gmail.com wrote:
I have it working now and it seems that the main thing I have changed to
make it work was to change the name of the field (from 'id' to something
else). I did not check afterwards in the documentation but I suspect that
SQLFORM.factory uses an 'id' field (hidden).
Makes sense since the handling of 'id' is special but only a trace
will tell us why.
There is no hidden 'id' field in SQLFORM.factory
I've been thinking about this one (generally, not the id issue specifically).
The semantics of accepts() is designed to catch form validation errors and
provide feedback to the client. It's not designed to diagnose form programming
errors, and many (most?) of those errors come back looking as though the form
had not been submitted (return False, nothing in form.errors).
That reinforces my notion that there ought to be another form variable to
provide feedback to the designer about why a form was not accepted, say
form.status. I realize that this might not always be clear-cut, in that in the
event of some form errors it's not 100% obvious whether there's an error or
there was no submission. But at least it'd be possible to describe what
accepts() thinks it saw.
The intent would be to help with development diagnostics, not so much for
deployment.
What I could not understand was that when I the normal crud form in the html
there were two identical fields('id') although I had only one in my
definition. Changing the name of the field corrected that and the
redirection took place as expected.
What crud?.
Re: [web2py] Url variable's problem
On Dec 24, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Arun K.Rajeevan wrote: I'm running python 2.5.1 at windows and 2.6.5 at linux. Is there any change in python's behaviors with dict() Not a relevant one that I can think of. If you have the time and inclination, it'd be interesting to track down exactly what's going on. Assuming that the problem is reproducible Did you get a chance to dump query_string in the failing case?
[web2py] pointing to the DB folder with new DAL
Hey,
Trying the new DAL with latest trunk again. Only one issue left which
is pointing to the DB folder. This used to work, now, no matter what I
have tried, it generates everything relative to the script making the
connection. This is what I do using pre 1.9x :
tail,head = os.path.split(sys.argv[0])
db = DAL(sqlite://storage.sqlite,
folder={0}/blueLite/db_storage.format(tail))
I tried different variations, but all yield the same results.
This is for my buildrelease system. I use both w2p, the full
framework, and DAL (outside of the web context - so scripted only). I
need to wipe clean the entire contents of the top level folder, which
includes all scripts as well as the DB every time builds are kicked
off (which is many times a day, many different servers and OS
platforms).
I would prefer not having 2 versions of w2p on each box (time needed
in bootstrapping servers is important).
Anyone with insight convincing DAL to make use of the 'folder' param
in the connection string?
Thanks,
Mart :)
[web2py] Re: Is this broken?
Nothing changed in this respect. Probably the values of the indices [2]
[3] is wrong.
I will try if you post your code without links in it. ;-)
On Dec 24, 11:21 am, Arun K.Rajeevan the1.a...@gmail.com wrote:
See following form
search_form = FORM http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/FORM(LABEL
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/LABEL('Search a word: ',
_for='word', _id='word_label', _name='word_label'),
INPUT
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/INPUT(_id='word', _name='word',
requires=IS_NOT_EMPTY
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_NOT_EMPTY()),
SELECT
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/SELECT(_name='languages',
_id='languages', requires=IS_IN_DB
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_IN_DB(db,'languages.id'),
*options_added),
INPUT
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/INPUT(_type=submit,_value=SEARCH),
_name='search_form')
I used to do something like search_form[2][3]['_selected']=True
But now with 1.91.x this shows an error (Assignment with NoneType or
something similar)
What happened?
[web2py] Re: ajax polling with web2py
The general solution is web2py_ajax_page in my previous example and return js using response.js. On Dec 24, 11:22 am, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: Yes, I do have an ajax generated by code inside another ajax. But I'm not married to that approach, especially if it doesn't work. I'm just looking for anything that works -- doesn't have to be pretty. Bottom line, we need a general solution to this problem. User clicks an ajax-ified widget/link/whatever. This generates a job-queue entry and a callback. Callback checks status of job and returns one of two responses. If job finished, returns final view. If job not finished, returns wait message and ajax countdown to check queue status again after prescribed time period. I've cracked my skull on this problem now on two different occasions over the last 3 months. On many attempts, I feel like I've gotten close, but in the end have made zero progress. As I said, this is mission critical to my app, so any help is much appreciated. On Dec 24, 2:22 am, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: Do you have an ajax generated by code inside another ajax request? I believe SCRIPT(...) is returned but never executed for the same reason as in your code at the beginning of the thread: script.../ script inside ajax content are ignored by the browser. On Dec 24, 12:16 am, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: Problem with my example above is that the setInterval is not being executed after the callback.
Re: [web2py] Re: Is this broken?
search_form = FORM(LABEL('Search a word: ', _for='word',
_id='word_label', _name='word_label'),
INPUT(_id='word', _name='word', requires=IS_NOT_EMPTY()),
SELECT(_name='languages', _id='languages',
requires=IS_IN_DB(db,'languages.id'), *options_added),
INPUT(_type=submit,_value=SEARCH),
_name='search_form')
That better? Looks like a book example, though.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 7:35 PM, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
Nothing changed in this respect. Probably the values of the indices [2]
[3] is wrong.
I will try if you post your code without links in it. ;-)
On Dec 24, 11:21 am, Arun K.Rajeevan the1.a...@gmail.com wrote:
See following form
search_form = FORM http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/FORM(LABEL
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/LABEL('Search a word: ',
_for='word', _id='word_label', _name='word_label'),
INPUT
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/INPUT(_id='word', _name='word',
requires=IS_NOT_EMPTY
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_NOT_EMPTY()),
SELECT
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/SELECT(_name='languages',
_id='languages', requires=IS_IN_DB
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_IN_DB(db,'languages.id'),
*options_added),
INPUT
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/INPUT(_type=submit,_value=SEARCH),
_name='search_form')
I used to do something like search_form[2][3]['_selected']=True
But now with 1.91.x this shows an error (Assignment with NoneType or
something similar)
What happened?
--
Branko Vukelic
stu...@brankovukelic.com
http://www.brankovukelic.com/
[web2py] Re: question about ajax(...); return false;
only a onclick=.; return false;.../a else the page is reloaded no matter what the . do. On Dec 24, 11:26 am, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: Should one's view *always* have a return false; statement immediately after an ajax request? Why?
[web2py] Re: Custom form
please no more links in code. :-(
On Dec 24, 11:19 am, Arun K.Rajeevan the1.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Following are my tables.
I need a form with an image upload (that's for table pictures), a disabled
input with content (that's words.word) and a languages selection box(for
word.lang). Upon form submission, I'll populate all other fields required for
both tables.
Is there a simple way to do this?
If not,
How to insert a picture manually.(with proper renaming etc., that's default)
I'm running on GAE.
db.define_table('languages',
Field
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/Field('full', 'string',
length=30, notnull=True, required=True),
Field
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/Field('short', 'string',
length=10 , notnull=True, required=True),
Field
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/Field('natural', 'string',
length=30),
format='%(full)s - %(short)s')
db.define_table('words',
Field
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/Field('word', 'string',
notnull=True, required=True),
Field
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/Field('lang', db.languages,
notnull=True, writable=False),
Field
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/Field('entry_by', db.auth_user,
notnull=True, readable=False, writable=False))
db.define_table('pictures',
Field
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/Field('image', 'upload',
notnull=True, required=True, label='Visual Lingua'),
Field
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/Field('word', 'list:reference
words', readable=False, writable=False, required=True),
Field
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/Field('total', 'integer',
readable=False, writable=False, default=2),
Field
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/Field('clicks', 'integer',
readable=False, writable=False, default=1),
Field
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/Field('rating', 'double',
readable=False, writable=False, compute=lambda row:
row['total']/row['clicks']),
Field
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/Field('entry_by', db.auth_user,
notnull=True, readable=False, writable=False))
db.languages.full.requires = [IS_NOT_EMPTY
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_NOT_EMPTY(), IS_NOT_IN_DB
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_NOT_IN_DB(db,
'languages.full')]
db.languages.short.requires = [IS_NOT_EMPTY
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_NOT_EMPTY(), IS_NOT_IN_DB
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_NOT_IN_DB(db,
'languages.short')]
db.languages.natural.requires = [IS_NOT_IN_DB
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_NOT_IN_DB(db,
'languages.natural')]
db.words.word.requires = IS_NOT_EMPTY
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_NOT_EMPTY()
db.words.lang.requires = IS_IN_DB
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_IN_DB(db, 'languages.id')
db.words.entry_by.requires = [IS_IN_DB
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_IN_DB(db, 'auth_user.id')]
db.pictures.image.requires = [IS_NOT_EMPTY
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_NOT_EMPTY(), IS_LENGTH
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_LENGTH(262144, 4096),
IS_IMAGE
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_IMAGE(minsize=(60, 60))]
#min_size 4kb, max_size 256kb; min_width 60px min_height 60px
db.pictures.entry_by.requires = [IS_IN_DB
http://127.0.0.1:8000/examples/global/vars/IS_IN_DB(db, 'auth_user.id')]
[web2py] Re: App admin error
Yes, That's working now. Great Thank you. :)
[web2py] Re: Custom form
Oh, How that happernd.
I'm using new groups. It have advanced edit field. Hides links.
For me it doesn't show links
anyways, code without links follows.
(*But, I'll be more than happy, if I can go with a custom form.*
**
*Only thing that I don't know in that case, is how to deal with upload field
and make it into db.)*
db.define_table('languages',
Field('full', 'string', length=30, notnull=True,
required=True),
Field('short', 'string', length=10 , notnull=True,
required=True),
Field('natural', 'string', length=30),
format='%(full)s - %(short)s')
db.define_table('words',
Field('word', 'string', notnull=True, required=True),
Field('lang', db.languages, notnull=True, writable=False),
Field('entry_by', db.auth_user, notnull=True,
readable=False, writable=False))
db.define_table('pictures',
Field('image', 'upload', notnull=True, required=True,
label='Visual Lingua'),
Field('word', 'list:reference words', readable=False,
writable=False, required=True),
Field('total', 'integer', readable=False, writable=False,
default=2),
Field('clicks', 'integer', readable=False, writable=False,
default=1),
Field('rating', 'double', readable=False, writable=False,
compute=lambda row: row['total']/row['clicks']),
Field('entry_by', db.auth_user, notnull=True,
readable=False, writable=False))
db.languages.full.requires = [IS_NOT_EMPTY(),
IS_NOT_IN_DB(db, 'languages.full')]
db.languages.short.requires = [IS_NOT_EMPTY(), IS_NOT_IN_DB(db,
'languages.short')]
db.languages.natural.requires = [IS_NOT_IN_DB(db, 'languages.natural')]
db.words.word.requires = IS_NOT_EMPTY()
db.words.lang.requires = IS_IN_DB(db, 'languages.id')
db.words.entry_by.requires = [IS_IN_DB(db, 'auth_user.id')]
db.pictures.image.requires = [IS_NOT_EMPTY(), IS_LENGTH(262144, 4096),
IS_IMAGE(minsize=(60, 60))] #min_size 4kb,
max_size 256kb; min_width 60px min_height 60px
db.pictures.entry_by.requires = [IS_IN_DB(db, 'auth_user.id')]
[web2py] Re: pointing to the DB folder with new DAL
Please check trunk. I think it is now fixed.
On Dec 24, 12:04 pm, mart msenecal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
Trying the new DAL with latest trunk again. Only one issue left which
is pointing to the DB folder. This used to work, now, no matter what I
have tried, it generates everything relative to the script making the
connection. This is what I do using pre 1.9x :
tail,head = os.path.split(sys.argv[0])
db = DAL(sqlite://storage.sqlite,
folder={0}/blueLite/db_storage.format(tail))
I tried different variations, but all yield the same results.
This is for my buildrelease system. I use both w2p, the full
framework, and DAL (outside of the web context - so scripted only). I
need to wipe clean the entire contents of the top level folder, which
includes all scripts as well as the DB every time builds are kicked
off (which is many times a day, many different servers and OS
platforms).
I would prefer not having 2 versions of w2p on each box (time needed
in bootstrapping servers is important).
Anyone with insight convincing DAL to make use of the 'folder' param
in the connection string?
Thanks,
Mart :)
Re: [web2py] Re: Is this broken?
This is only a part of original form. ;-) Links appear in code without my knowledge. I copies from browser but new groups support rich text so those without using it sees links. else it's fine.
Re: [web2py] Re: Is this broken?
This is only a part of original form. ;-) Links appear in code without my knowledge. I copies from browser but new groups support rich text so those without using it sees links. else it's fine. List have 251 elements. (it's a list of languages)
Re: [web2py] Url variable's problem
Nope, I didn't go for dumping variables. I'm also interested to know the cause. may be another day
Re: [web2py] Url variable's problem
Hi hi, back on windows. Problem is still there. If this is not python, then it must be browser.
Re: [web2py] Url variable's problem
Voila, I found the culprit.
In linux box, I changed *vars={'indx':search_form.vars.indx}** *to* vars={
'i':search_form.vars.indx}
Note:* key 'indx' is renamed to 'i' (indx is the name of hidden field)
I still don't know, why this occurred.
it's just a key name (string). still!!!
Re: [web2py] Re: Is this broken?
Silly me. I forgot to convert value into int. (it's in string form '3')
[web2py] Re: pointing to the DB folder with new DAL
THANK YOU! :) working even better than before :)
BTW - the new DAL caught a couple of my mistakes. Made the change to
my script and ran it through the diff tool. Here's a snippet. You can
dump the following to a browser to see. pretty nifty!
Thanks again for quick turn around, much appreciated!
thanks,
Mart :)
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN http://www.w3.org/
TR/html4/strict.dtd
html
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1
titleUntitled Document/title
/head
body
BRbuild_of_day = /SPANDEL
STYLE=background:#FFE6E6;
TITLE=i=49098None/DELINS STYLE=background:#E6FFE6;
TITLE=i=490980/INSSPAN TITLE=i=49099para;BR
buildOfDay =
db(db.cumulativeProperties.name=='buildOfDay').select()para;BR
/SPANDEL STYLE=background:#FFE6E6; TITLE=i=49189i/DELSPAN
TITLE=i=49189f/SPANINS STYLE=background:#E6FFE6;
TITLE=i=49190or row in/INSSPAN TITLE=i=49199 buildOfDay:/
SPANINS STYLE=background:#E6FFE6; TITLE=i=49211para;BR/
INSSPAN TITLE=i=49212/SPANINS STYLE=background:#E6FFE6;
TITLE=i=49216if row.name == 'buildOfDay':/INSSPAN
TITLE=i=49252para;BR/SPANINS STYLE=background:#E6FFE6;
TITLE=i=49253/INSSPAN TITLE=i=49257
build_of_day = int(/SPANDEL STYLE=background:#FFE6E6;
TITLE=i=49288buildOfD/DELINS STYLE=background:#E6FFE6;
TITLE=i=49288row.v/INSSPAN TITLE=i=49293a/SPANDEL
STYLE=background:#FFE6E6; TITLE=i=49294y/DELINS
STYLE=background:#E6FFE6; TITLE=i=49294lue/INSSPAN
TITLE=i=49297) + 1para;BR/SPANINS STYLE=background:#E6FFE6;
TITLE=i=49303/INSSPAN TITLE=i=49307
else:para;BR/SPANINS STYLE=background:#E6FFE6;
TITLE=i=49321/INSSPAN TITLE=i=49325
build_of_day = 0/SPANINS STYLE=background:#E6FFE6;
TITLE=i=49353/INSSPAN TITLE=i=49365
/body
/html
On Dec 24, 1:47 pm, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
Please check trunk. I think it is now fixed.
On Dec 24, 12:04 pm, mart msenecal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
Trying the new DAL with latest trunk again. Only one issue left which
is pointing to the DB folder. This used to work, now, no matter what I
have tried, it generates everything relative to the script making the
connection. This is what I do using pre 1.9x :
tail,head = os.path.split(sys.argv[0])
db = DAL(sqlite://storage.sqlite,
folder={0}/blueLite/db_storage.format(tail))
I tried different variations, but all yield the same results.
This is for my buildrelease system. I use both w2p, the full
framework, and DAL (outside of the web context - so scripted only). I
need to wipe clean the entire contents of the top level folder, which
includes all scripts as well as the DB every time builds are kicked
off (which is many times a day, many different servers and OS
platforms).
I would prefer not having 2 versions of w2p on each box (time needed
in bootstrapping servers is important).
Anyone with insight convincing DAL to make use of the 'folder' param
in the connection string?
Thanks,
Mart :)
[web2py] New QA-Stack version released (beta)
Hi Folks, thanks for testing the site, I've released the third beta of qa-stack, this release includes JANRAIN login, use your google, yahoo, openid/myopenid accounts to log in into the site, and feel free to post test questions and answers, there are still many things to work out but at least you can get a feel of what is to come. Site is http://beta.qa-stack.com/ qa-stack uses a point system to advance the user to higher roles, which in turn allows you to do more stuff on the site, like ban questions, edit other user's data, mark questions as featured, mark answers as outstanding, etc. However, a user with lower roles can be upgraded to a higher role by a SysAdmin, this will give you lots of flexibility, there will be about 5 more cycles of beta releases and finally a version you can download yourselves and test locally, etc. Merry Christmas, Julio
[web2py] Re: question about ajax(...); return false;
I use onclick=ajax(...); in lots of places without the return false and never have observed the page getting reloaded on either firefox or chrome. On Dec 24, 1:37 pm, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: only a onclick=.; return false;.../a else the page is reloaded no matter what the . do. On Dec 24, 11:26 am, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: Should one's view *always* have a return false; statement immediately after an ajax request? Why?
[web2py] Re: ajax polling with web2py
Argh. I'm struggling. The third arg to web2py_ajax_page is data. If I'm ajaxing a multi-field form, can I make this data=['field1','field2',...]? I'm trying it but it doesn't seem to be working. On Dec 24, 1:36 pm, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: The general solution is web2py_ajax_page in my previous example and return js using response.js. On Dec 24, 11:22 am, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: Yes, I do have an ajax generated by code inside another ajax. But I'm not married to that approach, especially if it doesn't work. I'm just looking for anything that works -- doesn't have to be pretty. Bottom line, we need a general solution to this problem. User clicks an ajax-ified widget/link/whatever. This generates a job-queue entry and a callback. Callback checks status of job and returns one of two responses. If job finished, returns final view. If job not finished, returns wait message and ajax countdown to check queue status again after prescribed time period. I've cracked my skull on this problem now on two different occasions over the last 3 months. On many attempts, I feel like I've gotten close, but in the end have made zero progress. As I said, this is mission critical to my app, so any help is much appreciated. On Dec 24, 2:22 am, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: Do you have an ajax generated by code inside another ajax request? I believe SCRIPT(...) is returned but never executed for the same reason as in your code at the beginning of the thread: script.../ script inside ajax content are ignored by the browser. On Dec 24, 12:16 am, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: Problem with my example above is that the setInterval is not being executed after the callback.
[web2py] does response.js only work with web2py_ajax_page(...)?
Does response.js only work with web2py_ajax_page(...) call or will it also work with an ajax(...) call?
[web2py] Re: does response.js only work with web2py_ajax_page(...)?
All my tests seem to say that response.js doesn't work with ajax(...), only with web2py_ajax_pag(...). On Dec 24, 3:57 pm, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: Does response.js only work with web2py_ajax_page(...) call or will it also work with an ajax(...) call?
[web2py] Re: The stability of web2py releases
I am also satisfied with the release mechanism, but I'm working on small apps. If something goes wrong it's not the end of the world for me right now. But I think there are at least 2 reasons why this issue should be taken seriously. One is that the word Enterprise must be taken seriously (it was a source of criticism of web2py). And things like this is *one* contributing factor to whether or not this word Enterprise means something. Second reason is that while the current release mechanism is acceptable, if web2py grows and more people use web2py to develop critical apps, things like this inevitably becomes important. I think there is no need for a complex release mechanism. I think a simple mechanism can be effective and sufficient. For one thing, I don't think the 2-button suggestion is a good idea; it's just another indirect layer of information that might not be meaningful if the underlying mechanism is meaningful. Conversely, if the underlying mechanism is meaningful, there's no need for the 2- button solution. For example, if the release mechanism follows strictly Massimo's rule that 1.x.0 is likely a feature-introducing big release with potential big bugs, where as 1.x.9 is likely a bug- fixing release, then users can make intelligent decision to upgrade or not; so there's no need for 2 buttons. If this rule is not adhered as intended, however, then 2 buttons do not help. ONE SPECIFIC SUGGESTION I HAVE IS THIS: One upgrade button is fine, but in addition to that, there should be a summary Change Log, so users can preview the changes. This together with the current rule for release (as described by Massimo) should be sufficient for developers to make well-informed decision to upgrade or to wait.
Re: [web2py] Re: question about ajax(...); return false;
try this:
html
head
script
function remove()
{
var a = document.getElementById('id');
var b = (a.parentNode).removeChild(a);
}
function add(x,y){
alert(x+y);
return x+y;
}
/script
/head
body
span id=idtext/span
br /
input type=button value=Remove text onclick=remove(); /
a href= onclick=add(2,3); return false;2+3?/a
/body
/html
now try removing return false after add function.
the thing is, if function returnes value, page will be reloaded.
If functions does not have a return value, it will not reload the page.
But using return false always won't hurt ;)
p.s. you can see if it is reloaded if you remove text and click 2+3?.
if text is back, it is reloaded.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 9:52 PM, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote:
I use onclick=ajax(...); in lots of places without the return false
and never have observed the page getting reloaded on either firefox or
chrome.
On Dec 24, 1:37 pm, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
only
a onclick=.; return false;.../a
else the page is reloaded no matter what the . do.
On Dec 24, 11:26 am, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote:
Should one's view *always* have a return false; statement immediately
after an ajax request? Why?
Re: [web2py] Re: The stability of web2py releases
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:18 PM, VP vtp2...@gmail.com wrote: For one thing, I don't think the 2-button suggestion is a good idea; it's just another indirect layer of information that might not be meaningful if the underlying mechanism is meaningful. Conversely, if the underlying mechanism is meaningful, there's no need for the 2- button solution. For example, if the release mechanism follows strictly Massimo's rule that 1.x.0 is likely a feature-introducing big release with potential big bugs, where as 1.x.9 is likely a bug- fixing release, then users can make intelligent decision to upgrade or not; so there's no need for 2 buttons. If this rule is not adhered as intended, however, then 2 buttons do not help. 2-button solution doesn't solve the issue of making informed decisions. It solves the issue of having an option between upgrading to the next stable release, versus upgrading to the next release candidate. The use-case is valid, and was outlined by Kenneth. Inclusion of changelog is a good idea as well. The best place would be the confirmation page for the upgrade action. It may also be worthwhile to consider a single-button upgrade with a drop-down on the confirmation page. -- Branko Vukelic stu...@brankovukelic.com http://www.brankovukelic.com/
Re: [web2py] Url variable's problem
On Dec 24, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Arun K.Rajeevan wrote:
Voila, I found the culprit.
In linux box, I changed vars={'indx':search_form.vars.indx} to
vars={'i':search_form.vars.indx}
Note: key 'indx' is renamed to 'i' (indx is the name of hidden field)
I still don't know, why this occurred.
it's just a key name (string). still!!!
That's good. I'm still thinking that the underlying problem has something to do
with indx showing up twice in the form submission.
[web2py] Re: Unable to detect your browser
I did not know that. Is that a web2py common practice? last time I read anything similar was in TGears. Thanks again, appreciate it! d On Dec 23, 2:38 pm, Branko Vukelić stu...@brankovukelic.com wrote: 2010/12/23 greenpoise danel.sega...@gmail.com: brilliant!! THANKS SO MUCH! You're welcome. It also helps if you build a virtual environment for developing your apps. Keeps things clean. First you get virtualenv package with: $ easy_install-2.7 virtualenv Then you just run this: $ virtualenv --no-site-packages /path/to/my/env $ cd /path/to/my/env $ source bin/activate (env) $ python You'll notice that the interpreter version is now 2.7.x within the env, and that '(env)' is printed before your prompt. As far as I know, you cannot exit the environment other than by exiting the shell altogether. The environment is sealed off from your local Python install, so anything that you install within your environment is available only within the environment and if you use the ``--no-site-packages`` flag, no packages installed in your local Python path will not be accessible within the environment. Now, to develop with web2py within the virtualenv, you just copy web2py dir into the virtualenv dir, and that's it. Now you can run ``./web2py.py`` normally and web2py will use the interpreter installed in the env. -- Branko Vukelic stu...@brankovukelic.comhttp://www.brankovukelic.com/
Re: [web2py] Re: question about ajax(...); return false;
ok, i made a mistake. just ignore the explanation. didn't test :D
just try experimenting and see what happens.
return false -- prevents reloading, just like massimo said.
if you call function by onclick event in a with a href set, return will
prevent hyperlink event.
you can set href=# and that will have the same effect as return false.
but i prefer return false
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Marin Pranjic marin.pran...@gmail.comwrote:
try this:
html
head
script
function remove()
{
var a = document.getElementById('id');
var b = (a.parentNode).removeChild(a);
}
function add(x,y){
alert(x+y);
return x+y;
}
/script
/head
body
span id=idtext/span
br /
input type=button value=Remove text onclick=remove(); /
a href= onclick=add(2,3); return false;2+3?/a
/body
/html
now try removing return false after add function.
the thing is, if function returnes value, page will be reloaded.
If functions does not have a return value, it will not reload the page.
But using return false always won't hurt ;)
p.s. you can see if it is reloaded if you remove text and click 2+3?.
if text is back, it is reloaded.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 9:52 PM, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote:
I use onclick=ajax(...); in lots of places without the return false
and never have observed the page getting reloaded on either firefox or
chrome.
On Dec 24, 1:37 pm, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
only
a onclick=.; return false;.../a
else the page is reloaded no matter what the . do.
On Dec 24, 11:26 am, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote:
Should one's view *always* have a return false; statement immediately
after an ajax request? Why?
[web2py] Re: question about ajax(...); return false;
I guess that must be it. I am always using href=# on my links with
ajax onclicks, so it never redirects even if return false; is missing.
On Dec 24, 4:40 pm, Marin Pranjic marin.pran...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, i made a mistake. just ignore the explanation. didn't test :D
just try experimenting and see what happens.
return false -- prevents reloading, just like massimo said.
if you call function by onclick event in a with a href set, return will
prevent hyperlink event.
you can set href=# and that will have the same effect as return false.
but i prefer return false
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Marin Pranjic
marin.pran...@gmail.comwrote:
try this:
html
head
script
function remove()
{
var a = document.getElementById('id');
var b = (a.parentNode).removeChild(a);
}
function add(x,y){
alert(x+y);
return x+y;
}
/script
/head
body
span id=idtext/span
br /
input type=button value=Remove text onclick=remove(); /
a href= onclick=add(2,3); return false;2+3?/a
/body
/html
now try removing return false after add function.
the thing is, if function returnes value, page will be reloaded.
If functions does not have a return value, it will not reload the page.
But using return false always won't hurt ;)
p.s. you can see if it is reloaded if you remove text and click 2+3?.
if text is back, it is reloaded.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 9:52 PM, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote:
I use onclick=ajax(...); in lots of places without the return false
and never have observed the page getting reloaded on either firefox or
chrome.
On Dec 24, 1:37 pm, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
only
a onclick=.; return false;.../a
else the page is reloaded no matter what the . do.
On Dec 24, 11:26 am, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote:
Should one's view *always* have a return false; statement immediately
after an ajax request? Why?
[web2py] Anybody use web2py_ajax_page(...) function?
It takes a data argument. I'm wondering how to pass data from my form to the data argument?
[web2py] Re: Anybody use web2py_ajax_page(...) function? [Closed]
OK, I think I figured out that I need components. Somehow, I missed this new capability of web2py. But it looks like it is precisely what I need. On Dec 24, 4:44 pm, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: It takes a data argument. I'm wondering how to pass data from my form to the data argument?
[web2py] Re: question about ajax(...); return false; [Closed]
On Dec 24, 4:42 pm, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote:
I guess that must be it. I am always using href=# on my links with
ajax onclicks, so it never redirects even if return false; is missing.
On Dec 24, 4:40 pm, Marin Pranjic marin.pran...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, i made a mistake. just ignore the explanation. didn't test :D
just try experimenting and see what happens.
return false -- prevents reloading, just like massimo said.
if you call function by onclick event in a with a href set, return will
prevent hyperlink event.
you can set href=# and that will have the same effect as return false.
but i prefer return false
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Marin Pranjic
marin.pran...@gmail.comwrote:
try this:
html
head
script
function remove()
{
var a = document.getElementById('id');
var b = (a.parentNode).removeChild(a);
}
function add(x,y){
alert(x+y);
return x+y;
}
/script
/head
body
span id=idtext/span
br /
input type=button value=Remove text onclick=remove(); /
a href= onclick=add(2,3); return false;2+3?/a
/body
/html
now try removing return false after add function.
the thing is, if function returnes value, page will be reloaded.
If functions does not have a return value, it will not reload the page.
But using return false always won't hurt ;)
p.s. you can see if it is reloaded if you remove text and click 2+3?.
if text is back, it is reloaded.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 9:52 PM, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote:
I use onclick=ajax(...); in lots of places without the return false
and never have observed the page getting reloaded on either firefox or
chrome.
On Dec 24, 1:37 pm, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
only
a onclick=.; return false;.../a
else the page is reloaded no matter what the . do.
On Dec 24, 11:26 am, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote:
Should one's view *always* have a return false; statement immediately
after an ajax request? Why?
Re: [web2py] Re: The stability of web2py releases
+1 for a changelog view. The idea behind a two button upgrade is just as Branco explained, on my production instance I´d only upgrade to stable but on my development I´d upgrade to newest release just for helping out with testing. This way maybe not everyone upgrades their production server to a not stable release candidate. Kenneth On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:18 PM, VPvtp2...@gmail.com wrote: For one thing, I don't think the 2-button suggestion is a good idea; it's just another indirect layer of information that might not be meaningful if the underlying mechanism is meaningful. Conversely, if the underlying mechanism is meaningful, there's no need for the 2- button solution. For example, if the release mechanism follows strictly Massimo's rule that 1.x.0 is likely a feature-introducing big release with potential big bugs, where as 1.x.9 is likely a bug- fixing release, then users can make intelligent decision to upgrade or not; so there's no need for 2 buttons. If this rule is not adhered as intended, however, then 2 buttons do not help. 2-button solution doesn't solve the issue of making informed decisions. It solves the issue of having an option between upgrading to the next stable release, versus upgrading to the next release candidate. The use-case is valid, and was outlined by Kenneth. Inclusion of changelog is a good idea as well. The best place would be the confirmation page for the upgrade action. It may also be worthwhile to consider a single-button upgrade with a drop-down on the confirmation page.
[web2py] Re: does response.js only work with web2py_ajax_page(...)? [Closed]
Looks like all roads lead to components. On Dec 24, 4:15 pm, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: All my tests seem to say that response.js doesn't work with ajax(...), only with web2py_ajax_pag(...). On Dec 24, 3:57 pm, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: Does response.js only work with web2py_ajax_page(...) call or will it also work with an ajax(...) call?
[web2py] Re: Any success getting web2py to run on Cherokee?
I just posted some instructions herehttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/4332514/set-up-cherokee-web2py-on-ubuntu-10-04-lucid/4528543#4528543 for Cherokee 0.99.39. I think you can follow the same instructions for 1.0.12, but just be aware that the final Cherokee virtual server platform setup steps were changed. See the comments at the very bottom of the slicehttp://web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/64 : * * *__D: Virtual Servers - New (top left) * *1: Select platform uwsgi and Add * *2: Configuration File: /var/web2py/config.xml * *3: Give new hostname * *4: Documentroot: /var/web2py * *5: Use same log as default(combined) * * * *I could see its working for http://localhost without E,F,G and its beautiful!!* Also a note to the Web2Py-Ubuntu-install script maintainers: Universe repositories must be enabled in order to find some Web2Py dependencies. It was very confusing for me because I didn't realize this.
[web2py] Re: ajax polling with web2py [Closed]
Looks like this is going to have to be done with components. Didn't know until today that they even existed. Thank you chapter 13! On Dec 24, 3:53 pm, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: Argh. I'm struggling. The third arg to web2py_ajax_page is data. If I'm ajaxing a multi-field form, can I make this data=['field1','field2',...]? I'm trying it but it doesn't seem to be working. On Dec 24, 1:36 pm, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: The general solution is web2py_ajax_page in my previous example and return js using response.js. On Dec 24, 11:22 am, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: Yes, I do have an ajax generated by code inside another ajax. But I'm not married to that approach, especially if it doesn't work. I'm just looking for anything that works -- doesn't have to be pretty. Bottom line, we need a general solution to this problem. User clicks an ajax-ified widget/link/whatever. This generates a job-queue entry and a callback. Callback checks status of job and returns one of two responses. If job finished, returns final view. If job not finished, returns wait message and ajax countdown to check queue status again after prescribed time period. I've cracked my skull on this problem now on two different occasions over the last 3 months. On many attempts, I feel like I've gotten close, but in the end have made zero progress. As I said, this is mission critical to my app, so any help is much appreciated. On Dec 24, 2:22 am, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: Do you have an ajax generated by code inside another ajax request? I believe SCRIPT(...) is returned but never executed for the same reason as in your code at the beginning of the thread: script.../ script inside ajax content are ignored by the browser. On Dec 24, 12:16 am, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: Problem with my example above is that the setInterval is not being executed after the callback.
[web2py] Re: Any success getting web2py to run on Cherokee?
Cool, thanks for following up. I did manage to finally get something working and turned it into a new slice: http://web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/110 This is for Cherokee 1.0.14 which has a slightly different front-end. I also was able to get self-signed certs set up. Seems like a pretty nice setup.
Re: [web2py] Re: Server slow
I finally had time to find out a little about loggin.conf.
In my logs/web2py.log I get this line:
2010-12-25 01:42:30,097 - root - INFO - time to fetch 1.81220602989
So it takes under 2 seconds to fetch the data and the rest 37 to show
it? How come?
Kenneth
Were is this logged, I could not find anything in any logs?
Kenneth
try
import time, logging
def testing():
t0=time.time()
orders = db(db.orders.id 0).select()
logging.info('time to fetch %s' % (time.time()-t0))
return orders
so you can isolate the problem and see if it is in fetching or
somewhere else (for example session locking).
On Dec 2, 4:21 pm, Kenneth Lundströmkenneth.t.lundst...@gmail.com
wrote:
When you test is that the only active connection to the db?
I tested it on an application running on the test instance. There could
have been lite activity one production site.
But when I tested loading the same function five times in about 10
minutes I allways 39 seconds to load the data.
Kenneth
2010/12/2 Kenneth Lundströmkenneth.t.lundst...@gmail.com:
Please tell us more about the setup. Are the three instances behind
running on the same server?
Yes.
why three? What do they do?
One is production, one is testing and last one is development. I
had two
instances running on a virtual server before and it worked fine.
This is not normal but I suspect the problem is with database.
Did you set DAL(...,pool_size=10)?
No, but I tried but no change.
If I try to select more rows:
def testing():
orders = db(db.orders.id0).select()
return orders
It takes 80 seconds to return 1608 rows.
If I change the return to return len(troops) it only takes 1,5
seconds.
I have no view defined, just trying out the database.
Kenneth
On Dec 2, 5:13 am, Kenneth Lundströmkenneth.t.lundst...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello list,
need some help finding out why my server is so slow.
The server is with a Intel Celeron 2.66 GHz CPU, 4 GB of memory
CentOS 5.5 64-bit, Apache 2.2.3, MySQL 5.0.77, mod_wsgi, Web2py
1.89.5
The server is dedicated to web2py, there is three instances of
web2py
running.
I have migrate=False, sessions on disc.
If I try the following code
def testing():
customers = db(db.customer.id 0).select()
return customers
takes 39 seconds, 5 times in a row, to return 979 rows.
If I put db.customer 100 it takes 4,5 seconds to return 87
rows.
Is it just me or are this a bit long times?
Kenneth
[web2py] memory leak - model remains in memory after requests
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My web2py instance gradually eats memory, during day the consumption grows up to several gigs, so I have to restart often. According to guppy most of memory is occupied by gluon.dal.Field and other classes of dal: Partition of a set of 3231760 objects. Total size = 443724152 bytes. Index Count % Size % Cumulative % Kind 0 113419 4 189636568 43 189636568 43 dict of gluon.dal.Field 1 1324208 41 80561096 18 270197664 61 str 2 328642 10 15982732 4 286180396 64 tuple 3 26637 1 13851240 3 300031636 68 dict of gluon.validators.IS_IN_DB 4 98796 3 13436256 3 313467892 71 dict of gluon.dal.Set 5 20042 1 13344464 3 326812356 74 dict (no owner) 6 8199 0 11860464 3 338672820 76 gluon.dal.Row 7 16615 1 11482224 3 350155044 79 gluon.dal.Table 8 63682 2 8660752 2 358815796 81 dict of gluon.dal.Query 9 137779 4 7363776 2 366179572 83 list 2282 more rows. Type e.g. '_.more' to view. The proportion is relatively stable. It seems that model definition remains in memory after each request. It is probably caused by a weird reference, but I'm not sure how to track it. Please do you have any ideas? Thanks :) David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAk0VN9gACgkQ3oCkkciamVFHHwCfWiIkmrH9buBYA/7HvgIbz+mR ei0AniZ0UYwZtj9zagp2sx/IawmBE2iA =9cqX -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [web2py] memory leak - model remains in memory after requests
This is due to the built in rocket server (it is not ment for production). If you use Apache with mod_wsgi this will not happen. -- Thadeus 2010/12/24 David Zejda d...@atlas.cz -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My web2py instance gradually eats memory, during day the consumption grows up to several gigs, so I have to restart often. According to guppy most of memory is occupied by gluon.dal.Field and other classes of dal: Partition of a set of 3231760 objects. Total size = 443724152 bytes. Index Count % Size % Cumulative % Kind 0 113419 4 189636568 43 189636568 43 dict of gluon.dal.Field 1 1324208 41 80561096 18 270197664 61 str 2 328642 10 15982732 4 286180396 64 tuple 3 26637 1 13851240 3 300031636 68 dict of gluon.validators.IS_IN_DB 4 98796 3 13436256 3 313467892 71 dict of gluon.dal.Set 5 20042 1 13344464 3 326812356 74 dict (no owner) 6 8199 0 11860464 3 338672820 76 gluon.dal.Row 7 16615 1 11482224 3 350155044 79 gluon.dal.Table 8 63682 2 8660752 2 358815796 81 dict of gluon.dal.Query 9 137779 4 7363776 2 366179572 83 list 2282 more rows. Type e.g. '_.more' to view. The proportion is relatively stable. It seems that model definition remains in memory after each request. It is probably caused by a weird reference, but I'm not sure how to track it. Please do you have any ideas? Thanks :) David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAk0VN9gACgkQ3oCkkciamVFHHwCfWiIkmrH9buBYA/7HvgIbz+mR ei0AniZ0UYwZtj9zagp2sx/IawmBE2iA =9cqX -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [web2py] memory leak - model remains in memory after requests
On Dec 24, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Thadeus Burgess wrote: This is due to the built in rocket server (it is not ment for production). If you use Apache with mod_wsgi this will not happen. Do we understand why? Seems like it ought to be fixable. -- Thadeus 2010/12/24 David Zejda d...@atlas.cz -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My web2py instance gradually eats memory, during day the consumption grows up to several gigs, so I have to restart often. According to guppy most of memory is occupied by gluon.dal.Field and other classes of dal: Partition of a set of 3231760 objects. Total size = 443724152 bytes. Index Count % Size % Cumulative % Kind 0 113419 4 189636568 43 189636568 43 dict of gluon.dal.Field 1 1324208 41 80561096 18 270197664 61 str 2 328642 10 15982732 4 286180396 64 tuple 3 26637 1 13851240 3 300031636 68 dict of gluon.validators.IS_IN_DB 4 98796 3 13436256 3 313467892 71 dict of gluon.dal.Set 5 20042 1 13344464 3 326812356 74 dict (no owner) 6 8199 0 11860464 3 338672820 76 gluon.dal.Row 7 16615 1 11482224 3 350155044 79 gluon.dal.Table 8 63682 2 8660752 2 358815796 81 dict of gluon.dal.Query 9 137779 4 7363776 2 366179572 83 list 2282 more rows. Type e.g. '_.more' to view. The proportion is relatively stable. It seems that model definition remains in memory after each request. It is probably caused by a weird reference, but I'm not sure how to track it. Please do you have any ideas? Thanks :) David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAk0VN9gACgkQ3oCkkciamVFHHwCfWiIkmrH9buBYA/7HvgIbz+mR ei0AniZ0UYwZtj9zagp2sx/IawmBE2iA =9cqX -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[web2py] inter-component communication
I'm diving into components but the doc says something that could be a show-stopper: A component ... must perform its task independently of the rest of the page. I want to be able to ajax click on an item in one component and have it update a div in another component. I can't imagine this won't be possible, but the doc seems to suggest otherwise.
Re: [web2py] Re: Custom form
Em 24/12/2010, às 16:38, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu escreveu: please no more links in code. :-( I always copy the code from traceback in tickets page and it is copied formated. We need an option to copy raw text from the code in errors page. Most syntax highliters can do that, so I think this could be easy with JS to create a raw copy button. This would be useful for peeking code in admin/pluginwiki too. I mentioned that here before ( sometime when I pointed the Thadeu's weblog which has this feature) I'll try to include (raw, copy, print) buttons as options to highlight.py CODE helper and send a patch to explain better what I am saying. Bruno
[web2py] Re: Server slow
No idea. How much data.
What db? is it local? Probably something is wrong anyway.
On Dec 24, 5:55 pm, Kenneth Lundström kenneth.t.lundst...@gmail.com
wrote:
I finally had time to find out a little about loggin.conf.
In my logs/web2py.log I get this line:
2010-12-25 01:42:30,097 - root - INFO - time to fetch 1.81220602989
So it takes under 2 seconds to fetch the data and the rest 37 to show
it? How come?
Kenneth
Were is this logged, I could not find anything in any logs?
Kenneth
try
import time, logging
def testing():
t0=time.time()
orders = db(db.orders.id 0).select()
logging.info('time to fetch %s' % (time.time()-t0))
return orders
so you can isolate the problem and see if it is in fetching or
somewhere else (for example session locking).
On Dec 2, 4:21 pm, Kenneth Lundstr mkenneth.t.lundst...@gmail.com
wrote:
When you test is that the only active connection to the db?
I tested it on an application running on the test instance. There could
have been lite activity one production site.
But when I tested loading the same function five times in about 10
minutes I allways 39 seconds to load the data.
Kenneth
2010/12/2 Kenneth Lundstr mkenneth.t.lundst...@gmail.com:
Please tell us more about the setup. Are the three instances behind
running on the same server?
Yes.
why three? What do they do?
One is production, one is testing and last one is development. I
had two
instances running on a virtual server before and it worked fine.
This is not normal but I suspect the problem is with database.
Did you set DAL(...,pool_size=10)?
No, but I tried but no change.
If I try to select more rows:
def testing():
orders = db(db.orders.id 0).select()
return orders
It takes 80 seconds to return 1608 rows.
If I change the return to return len(troops) it only takes 1,5
seconds.
I have no view defined, just trying out the database.
Kenneth
On Dec 2, 5:13 am, Kenneth Lundstr mkenneth.t.lundst...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello list,
need some help finding out why my server is so slow.
The server is with a Intel Celeron 2.66 GHz CPU, 4 GB of memory
CentOS 5.5 64-bit, Apache 2.2.3, MySQL 5.0.77, mod_wsgi, Web2py
1.89.5
The server is dedicated to web2py, there is three instances of
web2py
running.
I have migrate=False, sessions on disc.
If I try the following code
def testing():
customers = db(db.customer.id 0).select()
return customers
takes 39 seconds, 5 times in a row, to return 979 rows.
If I put db.customer 100 it takes 4,5 seconds to return 87
rows.
Is it just me or are this a bit long times?
Kenneth
[web2py] Re: memory leak - model remains in memory after requests
Are we sure it is not a cache issue? Caching selects or actions with arguments eats memory. On Dec 24, 6:26 pm, Jonathan Lundell jlund...@pobox.com wrote: On Dec 24, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Thadeus Burgess wrote: This is due to the built in rocket server (it is not ment for production). If you use Apache with mod_wsgi this will not happen. Do we understand why? Seems like it ought to be fixable. -- Thadeus 2010/12/24 David Zejda d...@atlas.cz -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My web2py instance gradually eats memory, during day the consumption grows up to several gigs, so I have to restart often. According to guppy most of memory is occupied by gluon.dal.Field and other classes of dal: Partition of a set of 3231760 objects. Total size = 443724152 bytes. Index Count % Size % Cumulative % Kind 0 113419 4 189636568 43 189636568 43 dict of gluon.dal.Field 1 1324208 41 80561096 18 270197664 61 str 2 328642 10 15982732 4 286180396 64 tuple 3 26637 1 13851240 3 300031636 68 dict of gluon.validators.IS_IN_DB 4 98796 3 13436256 3 313467892 71 dict of gluon.dal.Set 5 20042 1 13344464 3 326812356 74 dict (no owner) 6 8199 0 11860464 3 338672820 76 gluon.dal.Row 7 16615 1 11482224 3 350155044 79 gluon.dal.Table 8 63682 2 8660752 2 358815796 81 dict of gluon.dal.Query 9 137779 4 7363776 2 366179572 83 list 2282 more rows. Type e.g. '_.more' to view. The proportion is relatively stable. It seems that model definition remains in memory after each request. It is probably caused by a weird reference, but I'm not sure how to track it. Please do you have any ideas? Thanks :) David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAk0VN9gACgkQ3oCkkciamVFHHwCfWiIkmrH9buBYA/7HvgIbz+mR ei0AniZ0UYwZtj9zagp2sx/IawmBE2iA =9cqX -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[web2py] Re: inter-component communication
You can do and there is nothing against it. It just that the components should not directly communicate serverside, execpt by sharing data in session. The component can return response.js with client-side instructions that affect other components. That is the idea and that is fine. On Dec 24, 7:09 pm, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: I'm diving into components but the doc says something that could be a show-stopper: A component ... must perform its task independently of the rest of the page. I want to be able to ajax click on an item in one component and have it update a div in another component. I can't imagine this won't be possible, but the doc seems to suggest otherwise.
[web2py] Re: Custom form
+1 On Dec 24, 8:48 pm, rochacbruno rochacbr...@gmail.com wrote: Em 24/12/2010, às 16:38, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu escreveu: please no more links in code. :-( I always copy the code from traceback in tickets page and it is copied formated. We need an option to copy raw text from the code in errors page. Most syntax highliters can do that, so I think this could be easy with JS to create a raw copy button. This would be useful for peeking code in admin/pluginwiki too. I mentioned that here before ( sometime when I pointed the Thadeu's weblog which has this feature) I'll try to include (raw, copy, print) buttons as options to highlight.py CODE helper and send a patch to explain better what I am saying. Bruno
[web2py] please explain this
what do you mean by word 'escape' when we say escape = False
or
in
{{=x}}
Variables injected into the HTML in this way are escaped by default. The
escaping is ignored if x is an XML object, even if escape is set to True.
--
Sahil Arora
B.Tech 2nd year
Computer Science and Engineering
IIT Delhi
Contact No: +91 9871491046
[web2py] Re: memory leak - model remains in memory after requests
Thadeus, You seem to have more knowledge about this problem. Can you file a bug report? Did you know that Rocket was recently updated fixing several bugs (and creating one that has already be addressed). I'm not denying the possibility, but let's be a good open source community. David, If your environment allows it, please replace rocket.py line 1071 break with return. Note that this will put a hard limit on the number of requests/second rocket can serve to the number of min_threads set. If the problem remains after that, then rocket is not the issue. I'm tending to side with Massimo. Caching issue? -tim On Dec 24, 6:20 pm, Thadeus Burgess thade...@thadeusb.com wrote: This is due to the built in rocket server (it is not ment for production). If you use Apache with mod_wsgi this will not happen. -- Thadeus 2010/12/24 David Zejda d...@atlas.cz -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My web2py instance gradually eats memory, during day the consumption grows up to several gigs, so I have to restart often. According to guppy most of memory is occupied by gluon.dal.Field and other classes of dal: Partition of a set of 3231760 objects. Total size = 443724152 bytes. Index Count % Size % Cumulative % Kind 0 113419 4 189636568 43 189636568 43 dict of gluon.dal.Field 1 1324208 41 80561096 18 270197664 61 str 2 328642 10 15982732 4 286180396 64 tuple 3 26637 1 13851240 3 300031636 68 dict of gluon.validators.IS_IN_DB 4 98796 3 13436256 3 313467892 71 dict of gluon.dal.Set 5 20042 1 13344464 3 326812356 74 dict (no owner) 6 8199 0 11860464 3 338672820 76 gluon.dal.Row 7 16615 1 11482224 3 350155044 79 gluon.dal.Table 8 63682 2 8660752 2 358815796 81 dict of gluon.dal.Query 9 137779 4 7363776 2 366179572 83 list 2282 more rows. Type e.g. '_.more' to view. The proportion is relatively stable. It seems that model definition remains in memory after each request. It is probably caused by a weird reference, but I'm not sure how to track it. Please do you have any ideas? Thanks :) David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAk0VN9gACgkQ3oCkkciamVFHHwCfWiIkmrH9buBYA/7HvgIbz+mR ei0AniZ0UYwZtj9zagp2sx/IawmBE2iA =9cqX -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[web2py] Re: inter-component communication
I don't understand. Let's say app has 2 components, a and b, each with its load view. I have discovered that an ajax that causes a to go to the server can then have a update b by returning a jQuery(#b_some_id).html(hello); I discovered this because I'm completely recasting my app as components and all the ajax scripts from before still work (after getting updating urls). I know this isn't what the doc describes (using response.js), but is it kosher, anyway? On Dec 24, 10:33 pm, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: You can do and there is nothing against it. It just that the components should not directly communicate serverside, execpt by sharing data in session. The component can return response.js with client-side instructions that affect other components. That is the idea and that is fine. On Dec 24, 7:09 pm, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: I'm diving into components but the doc says something that could be a show-stopper: A component ... must perform its task independently of the rest of the page. I want to be able to ajax click on an item in one component and have it update a div in another component. I can't imagine this won't be possible, but the doc seems to suggest otherwise.
[web2py] Re: please explain this
{{=x}}
is equivalent to
{{response.write(x,escape=True)}}
Did I answer the question?
On Dec 24, 10:04 pm, Sahil Arora sahilarora...@gmail.com wrote:
what do you mean by word 'escape' when we say escape = False
or
in
{{=x}}
Variables injected into the HTML in this way are escaped by default. The
escaping is ignored if x is an XML object, even if escape is set to True.
--
Sahil Arora
B.Tech 2nd year
Computer Science and Engineering
IIT Delhi
Contact No: +91 9871491046
[web2py] Re: memory leak - model remains in memory after requests
There is an easy way to check this: run web2py with any other web server using the new web2py/anyserver.py script. On Dec 24, 10:12 pm, Timbo tfarr...@owassobible.org wrote: Thadeus, You seem to have more knowledge about this problem. Can you file a bug report? Did you know that Rocket was recently updated fixing several bugs (and creating one that has already be addressed). I'm not denying the possibility, but let's be a good open source community. David, If your environment allows it, please replace rocket.py line 1071 break with return. Note that this will put a hard limit on the number of requests/second rocket can serve to the number of min_threads set. If the problem remains after that, then rocket is not the issue. I'm tending to side with Massimo. Caching issue? -tim On Dec 24, 6:20 pm, Thadeus Burgess thade...@thadeusb.com wrote: This is due to the built in rocket server (it is not ment for production). If you use Apache with mod_wsgi this will not happen. -- Thadeus 2010/12/24 David Zejda d...@atlas.cz -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My web2py instance gradually eats memory, during day the consumption grows up to several gigs, so I have to restart often. According to guppy most of memory is occupied by gluon.dal.Field and other classes of dal: Partition of a set of 3231760 objects. Total size = 443724152 bytes. Index Count % Size % Cumulative % Kind 0 113419 4 189636568 43 189636568 43 dict of gluon.dal.Field 1 1324208 41 80561096 18 270197664 61 str 2 328642 10 15982732 4 286180396 64 tuple 3 26637 1 13851240 3 300031636 68 dict of gluon.validators.IS_IN_DB 4 98796 3 13436256 3 313467892 71 dict of gluon.dal.Set 5 20042 1 13344464 3 326812356 74 dict (no owner) 6 8199 0 11860464 3 338672820 76 gluon.dal.Row 7 16615 1 11482224 3 350155044 79 gluon.dal.Table 8 63682 2 8660752 2 358815796 81 dict of gluon.dal.Query 9 137779 4 7363776 2 366179572 83 list 2282 more rows. Type e.g. '_.more' to view. The proportion is relatively stable. It seems that model definition remains in memory after each request. It is probably caused by a weird reference, but I'm not sure how to track it. Please do you have any ideas? Thanks :) David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAk0VN9gACgkQ3oCkkciamVFHHwCfWiIkmrH9buBYA/7HvgIbz+mR ei0AniZ0UYwZtj9zagp2sx/IawmBE2iA =9cqX -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[web2py] Re: inter-component communication
it is ok. i just it is more readable to use resnpose.js On Dec 24, 11:18 pm, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: I don't understand. Let's say app has 2 components, a and b, each with its load view. I have discovered that an ajax that causes a to go to the server can then have a update b by returning a jQuery(#b_some_id).html(hello); I discovered this because I'm completely recasting my app as components and all the ajax scripts from before still work (after getting updating urls). I know this isn't what the doc describes (using response.js), but is it kosher, anyway? On Dec 24, 10:33 pm, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote: You can do and there is nothing against it. It just that the components should not directly communicate serverside, execpt by sharing data in session. The component can return response.js with client-side instructions that affect other components. That is the idea and that is fine. On Dec 24, 7:09 pm, weheh richard_gor...@verizon.net wrote: I'm diving into components but the doc says something that could be a show-stopper: A component ... must perform its task independently of the rest of the page. I want to be able to ajax click on an item in one component and have it update a div in another component. I can't imagine this won't be possible, but the doc seems to suggest otherwise.
Re: [web2py] Re: please explain this
I am asking what does escape=true does
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:02 AM, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
{{=x}}
is equivalent to
{{response.write(x,escape=True)}}
Did I answer the question?
On Dec 24, 10:04 pm, Sahil Arora sahilarora...@gmail.com wrote:
what do you mean by word 'escape' when we say escape = False
or
in
{{=x}}
Variables injected into the HTML in this way are escaped by default. The
escaping is ignored if x is an XML object, even if escape is set to True.
--
Sahil Arora
B.Tech 2nd year
Computer Science and Engineering
IIT Delhi
Contact No: +91 9871491046
--
Sahil Arora
B.Tech 2nd year
Computer Science and Engineering
IIT Delhi
Contact No: +91 9871491046
Re: [web2py] Re: please explain this
Escape will convert the text to html entities. For example,
x = A 'quote' is bbold/b
print response.write(x, escape=True)
A 'quote' is lt;bgt;boldlt;/bgt;
This protects your page from html injection hacks. If you need to display
html from a variable and you know absolutely sure that it is safe, use
{{=XML(x)}}
Which also provides some helper methods to allow you to select safe tags
without allowing everything.
--
Thadeus
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Sahil Arora sahilarora...@gmail.comwrote:
I am asking what does escape=true does
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:02 AM, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.eduwrote:
{{=x}}
is equivalent to
{{response.write(x,escape=True)}}
Did I answer the question?
On Dec 24, 10:04 pm, Sahil Arora sahilarora...@gmail.com wrote:
what do you mean by word 'escape' when we say escape = False
or
in
{{=x}}
Variables injected into the HTML in this way are escaped by default. The
escaping is ignored if x is an XML object, even if escape is set to
True.
--
Sahil Arora
B.Tech 2nd year
Computer Science and Engineering
IIT Delhi
Contact No: +91 9871491046
--
Sahil Arora
B.Tech 2nd year
Computer Science and Engineering
IIT Delhi
Contact No: +91 9871491046
Re: [web2py] Re: please explain this
thanks
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Thadeus Burgess thade...@thadeusb.comwrote:
Escape will convert the text to html entities. For example,
x = A 'quote' is bbold/b
print response.write(x, escape=True)
A 'quote' is lt;bgt;boldlt;/bgt;
This protects your page from html injection hacks. If you need to display
html from a variable and you know absolutely sure that it is safe, use
{{=XML(x)}}
Which also provides some helper methods to allow you to select safe tags
without allowing everything.
--
Thadeus
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Sahil Arora sahilarora...@gmail.comwrote:
I am asking what does escape=true does
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:02 AM, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.eduwrote:
{{=x}}
is equivalent to
{{response.write(x,escape=True)}}
Did I answer the question?
On Dec 24, 10:04 pm, Sahil Arora sahilarora...@gmail.com wrote:
what do you mean by word 'escape' when we say escape = False
or
in
{{=x}}
Variables injected into the HTML in this way are escaped by default.
The
escaping is ignored if x is an XML object, even if escape is set to
True.
--
Sahil Arora
B.Tech 2nd year
Computer Science and Engineering
IIT Delhi
Contact No: +91 9871491046
--
Sahil Arora
B.Tech 2nd year
Computer Science and Engineering
IIT Delhi
Contact No: +91 9871491046
--
Sahil Arora
B.Tech 2nd year
Computer Science and Engineering
IIT Delhi
Contact No: +91 9871491046
[web2py] Re: inter-component communication
I thinking componentizing is the future present of website development.
