Re: You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/WebObjects/TheApp.woa/-5579 on this server.
Do a quick search for the message on 2nd April 2010: Re: Application not working with update 10.6.3 This is probably the same problem: The update added a few lines to /etc/apache2/httpd.conf To the end of the configuration of mailman: , it added: ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /Library/WebServer/CGI-Executables/ which promptly stopped the WebObjects apache adaptor from being seen. Hope that helps.. Mark On 15 Apr 2010, at 03:54, Jeff Schmitz wrote: Same thing was happening to me (I just upgraded to SL on my Dev machine), and after making the suggested change below, when I start my app with DirectConnect disabled I'm getting Forbidden You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/WebObjects/ netBrackets.woa/- on this server. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeff On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:34 PM, David LeBer wrote: On 2010-04-06, at 3:06 PM, David LeBer wrote: Hey all, I'm on Snow Leopard and my dev environment is not letting me connect to my app with direct connect disabled. Sheepishly, I can't remember whether this has worked since I updated to SL. Does anyone have a working apache2 httpd.conf file they could send me that I could compare against mine? Thx, ;david Thanks everyone, found it. Directory / Options FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None Order deny,allow Deny from all /Directory vs: Directory / Options FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None #Order deny,allow #Deny from all /Directory I thought I'd corrected that... ;david -- David LeBer Codeferous Software 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing' site: http://codeferous.com blog: http://davidleber.net profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber twitter:http://twitter.com/rebeld -- Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group: http://tacow.org ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jeffandmonica %40mac.com This email sent to jeffandmon...@mac.com ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/gowdy%40mac.com This email sent to go...@mac.com ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Basic question - lightweight to-one relationship from entity to POJO/enum
On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Well, there's only going to be one of each enum in memory. So, that's a
bonus.
Memory is cheap. :-)
They are fast to access... I don't block a thread waiting on a fault.
That's good too. On that same line of thought, there's no need to prefetch
them.
Well, reading in 5 key-value rows from a table can't take all that long, even
if you don't prefetch them. Obviously if they are used thousands of times in a
transaction, then you'll need to speed it up, but I'd optimize it only if it's
actually slowing things down.
Does any of that make a big difference? I don't know. Can't hurt though (^_^)
Depends on your definition of pain., I guess. :-)
I've always looked at it as a case of if the value is defined only in code, how
do people who are reading the data directly out of the DB know what the value
in the DB means? How do you make everything consistent between your app and a
reporting system reading data out of it?
DBA: Oh hey, this transaction has a status of 1. What does 1 mean? Is it
Active? Is it Closed? What? Now I've got to track down that bleeping developer
and ask him to interpret this data. Would it have been so hard for him to just
include all the context of his application in the DB where anyone can get at
it? It's not like a few 5-row key-value tables are going to bring the DB to
it's knees...
At least that's what I hear in my head whenever I think about it.
cue: Chuck.
Dave
On Apr 8, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Mark Wardle wrote:
Hi all, please forgive a very simple question but I'd like to create a
lightweight (non-EO) to-one relationship from an EO. I make heavy use
of D2W so I want to fulfil the WO/EOF rules and use to-one
relationship components
I usually create a new entity and have a genuine heavyweight EOF
relationship but I have several properties for which this seems
excessive.
I have an entity (FormEdssFull) which can have a visual field score
for both right and left eye.
Can I do this with a java enum?
public enum VisualAcuity {
NORMAL(0, Normal),
SIGNS_ONLY(1, Signs only:),
MODERATE(2, Moderate),
MARKED(3, Marked);
/* insert enum constructor etc... */
}
and then create the appropriate accessor and mutator in the entity?
What do other people do in these situations?
Many thanks,
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
Cardiff, UK
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora.com
This email sent to webobje...@avendasora.com
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40mac.com
This email sent to rgur...@mac.com
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Strange Problem with Ajax/Wonder
Thank you Mike, I am using WO 5.4.1 and wonderversion5.0.0-r10551/wonderversion. That is a rather new version I think. Two month ago I made an update ,from Version 4 to 5.0.0-r10551, hoping that this strange behaviour will be fixed (if its not my own mistake). Is there a way to ask Projectwonder for its ajax version ? Thank you Frank ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Basic question - lightweight to-one relationship from entity to POJO/enum
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:07 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Well, there's only going to be one of each enum in memory. So, that's a
bonus.
Memory is cheap. :-)
They are fast to access... I don't block a thread waiting on a fault.
That's good too. On that same line of thought, there's no need to prefetch
them.
Well, reading in 5 key-value rows from a table can't take all that long, even
if you don't prefetch them. Obviously if they are used thousands of times in
a transaction, then you'll need to speed it up, but I'd optimize it only if
it's actually slowing things down.
Does any of that make a big difference? I don't know. Can't hurt though
(^_^)
Depends on your definition of pain., I guess. :-)
I've always looked at it as a case of if the value is defined only in code,
how do people who are reading the data directly out of the DB know what the
value in the DB means? How do you make everything consistent between your app
and a reporting system reading data out of it?
DBA: Oh hey, this transaction has a status of 1. What does 1 mean? Is it
Active? Is it Closed? What? Now I've got to track down that bleeping
developer and ask him to interpret this data. Would it have been so hard for
him to just include all the context of his application in the DB where anyone
can get at it? It's not like a few 5-row key-value tables are going to bring
the DB to it's knees...
Wait, what is the DBA doing with some dumb DB tools when he has D2JC? (^_~)
I believe the enum prototype in wonder stores them as a string. So, continuing
with Mark's example, your DBA would just see NORMAL, SIGNS_ONLY, MODERATE, etc.
He doesn't see some fk and need to jump to another table to figure out what
that fk happens to be. It sounds like you're arguing against enumeration
entities now (^_^)
At least that's what I hear in my head whenever I think about it.
cue: Chuck.
Dave
On Apr 8, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Mark Wardle wrote:
Hi all, please forgive a very simple question but I'd like to create a
lightweight (non-EO) to-one relationship from an EO. I make heavy use
of D2W so I want to fulfil the WO/EOF rules and use to-one
relationship components
I usually create a new entity and have a genuine heavyweight EOF
relationship but I have several properties for which this seems
excessive.
I have an entity (FormEdssFull) which can have a visual field score
for both right and left eye.
Can I do this with a java enum?
public enum VisualAcuity {
NORMAL(0, Normal),
SIGNS_ONLY(1, Signs only:),
MODERATE(2, Moderate),
MARKED(3, Marked);
/* insert enum constructor etc... */
}
and then create the appropriate accessor and mutator in the entity?
What do other people do in these situations?
Many thanks,
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
Cardiff, UK
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora.com
This email sent to webobje...@avendasora.com
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40mac.com
This email sent to rgur...@mac.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: WebServerResources patternset
For posterity's sake: I got this working although the files are duplicated when built with ant. So now I have this: woproject/wsresources.include.patternset WebServerResources/**/* war/**/* woproject/wsresources-war.include.patternset (only used by ant, see below) **/* build.xml wsresources dir=. includesfile name=woproject/wsresources.include.patternset / excludesfile name=woproject/wsresources.exclude.patternset / /wsresources wsresources dir=war includesfile name=woproject/wsresources-war.include.patternset / /wsresources This works perfectly with the eclipse builder - it has no issues. The ant builder on the other hand seems to be special casing the WebServerResources source folder and treating others differently. With this setup using ant I get the war folder itself copied into the build's WSR AND the contents of war copied into the build's WSR. So there is duplication, but it will work. I'm on my way to file a bug since the behavior between eclipse and ant should be the same and it's not. Thanks, John ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Basic question - lightweight to-one relationship from entity to POJO/enum
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:53 AM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote: Wait, what is the DBA doing with some dumb DB tools when he has D2JC? (^_~) Ahg! Touché. ( ! ) That's a vertical smiley, btw. Dave ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/WebObjects/TheApp.woa/-5579 on this server.
On Apr 15, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Mark Gowdy wrote: Do a quick search for the message on 2nd April 2010: Re: Application not working with update 10.6.3 This is probably the same problem: The update added a few lines to /etc/apache2/httpd.conf To the end of the configuration of mailman: , it added: ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /Library/WebServer/CGI-Executables/ which promptly stopped the WebObjects apache adaptor from being seen. An easy way to avoid this stepping on of your configuration is to use something like /Apps/ instead of /cgi-bin/ to mark WO URLs, and also update apache.conf: # You can change the 'cgi-bin' part of WebObjectsAlias to whatever you # prefer (such as Apps), but the 'WebObjects' part is required. WebObjectsAlias /Apps/WebObjects I'd rather switch than fight. Chuck On 15 Apr 2010, at 03:54, Jeff Schmitz wrote: Same thing was happening to me (I just upgraded to SL on my Dev machine), and after making the suggested change below, when I start my app with DirectConnect disabled I'm getting Forbidden You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/WebObjects/ netBrackets.woa/- on this server. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeff On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:34 PM, David LeBer wrote: On 2010-04-06, at 3:06 PM, David LeBer wrote: Hey all, I'm on Snow Leopard and my dev environment is not letting me connect to my app with direct connect disabled. Sheepishly, I can't remember whether this has worked since I updated to SL. Does anyone have a working apache2 httpd.conf file they could send me that I could compare against mine? Thx, ;david Thanks everyone, found it. Directory / Options FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None Order deny,allow Deny from all /Directory vs: Directory / Options FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None #Order deny,allow #Deny from all /Directory I thought I'd corrected that... ;david -- David LeBer Codeferous Software 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing' site: http://codeferous.com blog: http://davidleber.net profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber twitter:http://twitter.com/rebeld -- Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group: http://tacow.org ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jeffandmonica%40mac.com This email sent to jeffandmon...@mac.com ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/gowdy%40mac.com This email sent to go...@mac.com ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net This email sent to ch...@global-village.net -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Basic question - lightweight to-one relationship from entity to POJO/enum
On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:53 AM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:07 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Well, there's only going to be one of each enum in memory. So,
that's a bonus.
Memory is cheap. :-)
They are fast to access... I don't block a thread waiting on a
fault. That's good too. On that same line of thought, there's no
need to prefetch them.
Well, reading in 5 key-value rows from a table can't take all that
long, even if you don't prefetch them. Obviously if they are used
thousands of times in a transaction, then you'll need to speed it
up, but I'd optimize it only if it's actually slowing things down.
Does any of that make a big difference? I don't know. Can't hurt
though (^_^)
Depends on your definition of pain., I guess. :-)
I've always looked at it as a case of if the value is defined only
in code, how do people who are reading the data directly out of the
DB know what the value in the DB means? How do you make everything
consistent between your app and a reporting system reading data out
of it?
DBA: Oh hey, this transaction has a status of 1. What does 1 mean?
Is it Active? Is it Closed? What? Now I've got to track down that
bleeping developer and ask him to interpret this data. Would it
have been so hard for him to just include all the context of his
application in the DB where anyone can get at it? It's not like a
few 5-row key-value tables are going to bring the DB to it's
knees...
Wait, what is the DBA doing with some dumb DB tools when he has
D2JC? (^_~)
I believe the enum prototype in wonder stores them as a string. So,
continuing with Mark's example, your DBA would just see NORMAL,
SIGNS_ONLY, MODERATE, etc. He doesn't see some fk and need to jump
to another table to figure out what that fk happens to be. It
sounds like you're arguing against enumeration entities now (^_^)
At least that's what I hear in my head whenever I think about it.
cue: Chuck.
So far, I have not been using enums - though I can see the
attraction. The big reason for that is that I am stuck with a tool
that can only parse Java 1.4 syntax. Using something like
ERXEnterpriseObjectCache with these Lookup EOs eliminates the fetching
problem leaving you with a small memory and performance overhead. It
is not something that keeps me up at night.
Chuck
On Apr 8, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Mark Wardle wrote:
Hi all, please forgive a very simple question but I'd like to
create a
lightweight (non-EO) to-one relationship from an EO. I make
heavy use
of D2W so I want to fulfil the WO/EOF rules and use to-one
relationship components
I usually create a new entity and have a genuine heavyweight EOF
relationship but I have several properties for which this seems
excessive.
I have an entity (FormEdssFull) which can have a visual field
score
for both right and left eye.
Can I do this with a java enum?
public enum VisualAcuity {
NORMAL(0, Normal),
SIGNS_ONLY(1, Signs only:),
MODERATE(2, Moderate),
MARKED(3, Marked);
/* insert enum constructor etc... */
}
and then create the appropriate accessor and mutator in the
entity?
What do other people do in these situations?
Many thanks,
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
Cardiff, UK
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora.com
This email sent to webobje...@avendasora.com
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40mac.com
This email sent to rgur...@mac.com
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net
This email sent to ch...@global-village.net
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to
Re: Basic question - lightweight to-one relationship from entity to POJO/enum
On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:53 AM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:07 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Well, there's only going to be one of each enum in memory. So,
that's a bonus.
Memory is cheap. :-)
They are fast to access... I don't block a thread waiting on a
fault. That's good too. On that same line of thought, there's no
need to prefetch them.
Well, reading in 5 key-value rows from a table can't take all that
long, even if you don't prefetch them. Obviously if they are used
thousands of times in a transaction, then you'll need to speed it
up, but I'd optimize it only if it's actually slowing things down.
Does any of that make a big difference? I don't know. Can't hurt
though (^_^)
Depends on your definition of pain., I guess. :-)
I've always looked at it as a case of if the value is defined only
in code, how do people who are reading the data directly out of the
DB know what the value in the DB means? How do you make everything
consistent between your app and a reporting system reading data out
of it?
DBA: Oh hey, this transaction has a status of 1. What does 1 mean?
Is it Active? Is it Closed? What? Now I've got to track down that
bleeping developer and ask him to interpret this data. Would it
have been so hard for him to just include all the context of his
application in the DB where anyone can get at it? It's not like a
few 5-row key-value tables are going to bring the DB to it's
knees...
Wait, what is the DBA doing with some dumb DB tools when he has
D2JC? (^_~)
I believe the enum prototype in wonder stores them as a string. So,
continuing with Mark's example, your DBA would just see NORMAL,
SIGNS_ONLY, MODERATE, etc. He doesn't see some fk and need to jump
to another table to figure out what that fk happens to be. It
sounds like you're arguing against enumeration entities now (^_^)
But said DBA will then commence whining about non-normalized data.
At least that's what I hear in my head whenever I think about it.
cue: Chuck.
Dave
On Apr 8, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Mark Wardle wrote:
Hi all, please forgive a very simple question but I'd like to
create a
lightweight (non-EO) to-one relationship from an EO. I make
heavy use
of D2W so I want to fulfil the WO/EOF rules and use to-one
relationship components
I usually create a new entity and have a genuine heavyweight EOF
relationship but I have several properties for which this seems
excessive.
I have an entity (FormEdssFull) which can have a visual field
score
for both right and left eye.
Can I do this with a java enum?
public enum VisualAcuity {
NORMAL(0, Normal),
SIGNS_ONLY(1, Signs only:),
MODERATE(2, Moderate),
MARKED(3, Marked);
/* insert enum constructor etc... */
}
and then create the appropriate accessor and mutator in the
entity?
What do other people do in these situations?
Many thanks,
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
Cardiff, UK
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora.com
This email sent to webobje...@avendasora.com
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40mac.com
This email sent to rgur...@mac.com
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net
This email sent to ch...@global-village.net
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Basic question - lightweight to-one relationship from entity to POJO/enum
I've found this interesting.
My problem is I already have 80 entities. For instance, I have an
entity representing structured medical data: as such it has about
fifty pick lists - representing these as separate entities will be a
nightmare! Using enums seems to work well and keeps these items in a
private namespace.
I also find it very convenient to create a NSDictionary with keys and
default values that can be used in awakeFromInsertion - Ive found it a
bit clumsy to start doing fetches to set default values in
awakeFromInsertion.
Unless there's a WO-way of doing that.
The other issue is when calculating things.
Using an enum, I can do:
If (reflexPlantarRight == ReflexPlantar.EXTENSOR) {
I've always found checking EO identity a bit clumsy!
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
(Sent from my mobile)
On 15 Apr 2010, at 18:53, Chuck Hill ch...@global-village.net wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:53 AM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:07 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Well, there's only going to be one of each enum in memory. So,
that's a bonus.
Memory is cheap. :-)
They are fast to access... I don't block a thread waiting on a
fault. That's good too. On that same line of thought, there's no
need to prefetch them.
Well, reading in 5 key-value rows from a table can't take all that
long, even if you don't prefetch them. Obviously if they are used
thousands of times in a transaction, then you'll need to speed it
up, but I'd optimize it only if it's actually slowing things down.
Does any of that make a big difference? I don't know. Can't hurt
though (^_^)
Depends on your definition of pain., I guess. :-)
I've always looked at it as a case of if the value is defined only
in code, how do people who are reading the data directly out of
the DB know what the value in the DB means? How do you make
everything consistent between your app and a reporting system
reading data out of it?
DBA: Oh hey, this transaction has a status of 1. What does 1
mean? Is it Active? Is it Closed? What? Now I've got to track down
that bleeping developer and ask him to interpret this data. Would
it have been so hard for him to just include all the context of
his application in the DB where anyone can get at it? It's not
like a few 5-row key-value tables are going to bring the DB to
it's knees...
Wait, what is the DBA doing with some dumb DB tools when he has
D2JC? (^_~)
I believe the enum prototype in wonder stores them as a string.
So, continuing with Mark's example, your DBA would just see NORMAL,
SIGNS_ONLY, MODERATE, etc. He doesn't see some fk and need to jump
to another table to figure out what that fk happens to be. It
sounds like you're arguing against enumeration entities now (^_^)
But said DBA will then commence whining about non-normalized data.
At least that's what I hear in my head whenever I think about it.
cue: Chuck.
Dave
On Apr 8, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Mark Wardle wrote:
Hi all, please forgive a very simple question but I'd like to
create a
lightweight (non-EO) to-one relationship from an EO. I make
heavy use
of D2W so I want to fulfil the WO/EOF rules and use to-one
relationship components
I usually create a new entity and have a genuine heavyweight EOF
relationship but I have several properties for which this seems
excessive.
I have an entity (FormEdssFull) which can have a visual field
score
for both right and left eye.
Can I do this with a java enum?
public enum VisualAcuity {
NORMAL(0, Normal),
SIGNS_ONLY(1, Signs only:),
MODERATE(2, Moderate),
MARKED(3, Marked);
/* insert enum constructor etc... */
}
and then create the appropriate accessor and mutator in the
entity?
What do other people do in these situations?
Many thanks,
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
Cardiff, UK
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora.com
This email sent to webobje...@avendasora.com
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40mac.com
This email sent to rgur...@mac.com
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net
This email sent to
Re: Basic question - lightweight to-one relationship from entity to POJO/enum
i'm an enum fan ... lookup tables are dead to me, because, as someone already
pointed out, you almost always want them synced between code and the database,
which invariably creates a mismatch at some point. the only reason i use lookup
tables at this point is if the enumerated values are runtime-mutable.
technically putting the enum name in a field isn't unnormalized, either, since
that IS the primary key for the enum. just because it happens to be a string
isn't a problem.
ms
On Apr 15, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Mark Wardle wrote:
I've found this interesting.
My problem is I already have 80 entities. For instance, I have an entity
representing structured medical data: as such it has about fifty pick lists -
representing these as separate entities will be a nightmare! Using enums
seems to work well and keeps these items in a private namespace.
I also find it very convenient to create a NSDictionary with keys and default
values that can be used in awakeFromInsertion - Ive found it a bit clumsy to
start doing fetches to set default values in awakeFromInsertion.
Unless there's a WO-way of doing that.
The other issue is when calculating things.
Using an enum, I can do:
If (reflexPlantarRight == ReflexPlantar.EXTENSOR) {
I've always found checking EO identity a bit clumsy!
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
(Sent from my mobile)
On 15 Apr 2010, at 18:53, Chuck Hill ch...@global-village.net wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:53 AM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:07 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Well, there's only going to be one of each enum in memory. So, that's a
bonus.
Memory is cheap. :-)
They are fast to access... I don't block a thread waiting on a fault.
That's good too. On that same line of thought, there's no need to
prefetch them.
Well, reading in 5 key-value rows from a table can't take all that long,
even if you don't prefetch them. Obviously if they are used thousands of
times in a transaction, then you'll need to speed it up, but I'd optimize
it only if it's actually slowing things down.
Does any of that make a big difference? I don't know. Can't hurt though
(^_^)
Depends on your definition of pain., I guess. :-)
I've always looked at it as a case of if the value is defined only in
code, how do people who are reading the data directly out of the DB know
what the value in the DB means? How do you make everything consistent
between your app and a reporting system reading data out of it?
DBA: Oh hey, this transaction has a status of 1. What does 1 mean? Is it
Active? Is it Closed? What? Now I've got to track down that bleeping
developer and ask him to interpret this data. Would it have been so hard
for him to just include all the context of his application in the DB where
anyone can get at it? It's not like a few 5-row key-value tables are going
to bring the DB to it's knees...
Wait, what is the DBA doing with some dumb DB tools when he has D2JC? (^_~)
I believe the enum prototype in wonder stores them as a string. So,
continuing with Mark's example, your DBA would just see NORMAL, SIGNS_ONLY,
MODERATE, etc. He doesn't see some fk and need to jump to another table to
figure out what that fk happens to be. It sounds like you're arguing
against enumeration entities now (^_^)
But said DBA will then commence whining about non-normalized data.
At least that's what I hear in my head whenever I think about it.
cue: Chuck.
Dave
On Apr 8, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Mark Wardle wrote:
Hi all, please forgive a very simple question but I'd like to create a
lightweight (non-EO) to-one relationship from an EO. I make heavy use
of D2W so I want to fulfil the WO/EOF rules and use to-one
relationship components
I usually create a new entity and have a genuine heavyweight EOF
relationship but I have several properties for which this seems
excessive.
I have an entity (FormEdssFull) which can have a visual field score
for both right and left eye.
Can I do this with a java enum?
public enum VisualAcuity {
NORMAL(0, Normal),
SIGNS_ONLY(1, Signs only:),
MODERATE(2, Moderate),
MARKED(3, Marked);
/* insert enum constructor etc... */
}
and then create the appropriate accessor and mutator in the entity?
What do other people do in these situations?
Many thanks,
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
Cardiff, UK
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora.com
This email sent to webobje...@avendasora.com
___
Re: Basic question - lightweight to-one relationship from entity to POJO/enum
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Mark Wardle wrote:
I've found this interesting.
My problem is I already have 80 entities. For instance, I have an
entity representing structured medical data: as such it has about
fifty pick lists - representing these as separate entities will be a
nightmare! Using enums seems to work well and keeps these items in a
private namespace.
I'd not be keen on 80 lookup tables either.
I also find it very convenient to create a NSDictionary with keys
and default values that can be used in awakeFromInsertion - Ive
found it a bit clumsy to start doing fetches to set default values
in awakeFromInsertion.
Unless there's a WO-way of doing that.
The other issue is when calculating things.
Using an enum, I can do:
If (reflexPlantarRight == ReflexPlantar.EXTENSOR) {
I've always found checking EO identity a bit clumsy!
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
(Sent from my mobile)
On 15 Apr 2010, at 18:53, Chuck Hill ch...@global-village.net wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:53 AM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:07 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Well, there's only going to be one of each enum in memory. So,
that's a bonus.
Memory is cheap. :-)
They are fast to access... I don't block a thread waiting on a
fault. That's good too. On that same line of thought, there's
no need to prefetch them.
Well, reading in 5 key-value rows from a table can't take all
that long, even if you don't prefetch them. Obviously if they are
used thousands of times in a transaction, then you'll need to
speed it up, but I'd optimize it only if it's actually slowing
things down.
Does any of that make a big difference? I don't know. Can't
hurt though (^_^)
Depends on your definition of pain., I guess. :-)
I've always looked at it as a case of if the value is defined
only in code, how do people who are reading the data directly out
of the DB know what the value in the DB means? How do you make
everything consistent between your app and a reporting system
reading data out of it?
DBA: Oh hey, this transaction has a status of 1. What does 1
mean? Is it Active? Is it Closed? What? Now I've got to track
down that bleeping developer and ask him to interpret this data.
Would it have been so hard for him to just include all the
context of his application in the DB where anyone can get at it?
It's not like a few 5-row key-value tables are going to bring the
DB to it's knees...
Wait, what is the DBA doing with some dumb DB tools when he has
D2JC? (^_~)
I believe the enum prototype in wonder stores them as a string.
So, continuing with Mark's example, your DBA would just see
NORMAL, SIGNS_ONLY, MODERATE, etc. He doesn't see some fk and
need to jump to another table to figure out what that fk happens
to be. It sounds like you're arguing against enumeration entities
now (^_^)
But said DBA will then commence whining about non-normalized data.
At least that's what I hear in my head whenever I think about it.
cue: Chuck.
Dave
On Apr 8, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Mark Wardle wrote:
Hi all, please forgive a very simple question but I'd like to
create a
lightweight (non-EO) to-one relationship from an EO. I make
heavy use
of D2W so I want to fulfil the WO/EOF rules and use to-one
relationship components
I usually create a new entity and have a genuine heavyweight EOF
relationship but I have several properties for which this seems
excessive.
I have an entity (FormEdssFull) which can have a visual field
score
for both right and left eye.
Can I do this with a java enum?
public enum VisualAcuity {
NORMAL(0, Normal),
SIGNS_ONLY(1, Signs only:),
MODERATE(2, Moderate),
MARKED(3, Marked);
/* insert enum constructor etc... */
}
and then create the appropriate accessor and mutator in the
entity?
What do other people do in these situations?
Many thanks,
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
Cardiff, UK
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-
d...@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora.com
This email sent to webobje...@avendasora.com
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40mac.com
This email sent to rgur...@mac.com
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
Re: Basic question - lightweight to-one relationship from entity to POJO/enum
There are a few reasons I can think of to put lookup tables in the database:
1) Can edit the user-viewable text without recompiling (if you design your
lookup tables correctly)
2) Localization
but most importantly:
3) Sorting happens at the database
sacha
On Apr 15, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
i'm an enum fan ... lookup tables are dead to me, because, as someone already
pointed out, you almost always want them synced between code and the
database, which invariably creates a mismatch at some point. the only reason
i use lookup tables at this point is if the enumerated values are
runtime-mutable. technically putting the enum name in a field isn't
unnormalized, either, since that IS the primary key for the enum. just
because it happens to be a string isn't a problem.
ms
On Apr 15, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Mark Wardle wrote:
I've found this interesting.
My problem is I already have 80 entities. For instance, I have an entity
representing structured medical data: as such it has about fifty pick lists
- representing these as separate entities will be a nightmare! Using enums
seems to work well and keeps these items in a private namespace.
I also find it very convenient to create a NSDictionary with keys and
default values that can be used in awakeFromInsertion - Ive found it a bit
clumsy to start doing fetches to set default values in awakeFromInsertion.
Unless there's a WO-way of doing that.
The other issue is when calculating things.
Using an enum, I can do:
If (reflexPlantarRight == ReflexPlantar.EXTENSOR) {
I've always found checking EO identity a bit clumsy!
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
(Sent from my mobile)
On 15 Apr 2010, at 18:53, Chuck Hill ch...@global-village.net wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:53 AM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:07 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Well, there's only going to be one of each enum in memory. So, that's a
bonus.
Memory is cheap. :-)
They are fast to access... I don't block a thread waiting on a fault.
That's good too. On that same line of thought, there's no need to
prefetch them.
Well, reading in 5 key-value rows from a table can't take all that long,
even if you don't prefetch them. Obviously if they are used thousands of
times in a transaction, then you'll need to speed it up, but I'd optimize
it only if it's actually slowing things down.
Does any of that make a big difference? I don't know. Can't hurt though
(^_^)
Depends on your definition of pain., I guess. :-)
I've always looked at it as a case of if the value is defined only in
code, how do people who are reading the data directly out of the DB know
what the value in the DB means? How do you make everything consistent
between your app and a reporting system reading data out of it?
DBA: Oh hey, this transaction has a status of 1. What does 1 mean? Is it
Active? Is it Closed? What? Now I've got to track down that bleeping
developer and ask him to interpret this data. Would it have been so hard
for him to just include all the context of his application in the DB
where anyone can get at it? It's not like a few 5-row key-value tables
are going to bring the DB to it's knees...
Wait, what is the DBA doing with some dumb DB tools when he has D2JC? (^_~)
I believe the enum prototype in wonder stores them as a string. So,
continuing with Mark's example, your DBA would just see NORMAL,
SIGNS_ONLY, MODERATE, etc. He doesn't see some fk and need to jump to
another table to figure out what that fk happens to be. It sounds like
you're arguing against enumeration entities now (^_^)
But said DBA will then commence whining about non-normalized data.
At least that's what I hear in my head whenever I think about it.
cue: Chuck.
Dave
On Apr 8, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Mark Wardle wrote:
Hi all, please forgive a very simple question but I'd like to create a
lightweight (non-EO) to-one relationship from an EO. I make heavy use
of D2W so I want to fulfil the WO/EOF rules and use to-one
relationship components
I usually create a new entity and have a genuine heavyweight EOF
relationship but I have several properties for which this seems
excessive.
I have an entity (FormEdssFull) which can have a visual field score
for both right and left eye.
Can I do this with a java enum?
public enum VisualAcuity {
NORMAL(0, Normal),
SIGNS_ONLY(1, Signs only:),
MODERATE(2, Moderate),
MARKED(3, Marked);
/* insert enum constructor etc... */
}
and then create the appropriate accessor and mutator in the entity?
What do other people do in these situations?
Many thanks,
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
Cardiff, UK
___
Do not post admin requests to the
Re: Basic question - lightweight to-one relationship from entity to POJO/enum
Just to add another one to the mix, I use CSV text files in Resources for
static lookups. two columns, first is key, second is value.
They are lazy-initialized into a immutable dictionary and used in Popup menus,
etc.
A few static utility methods and you are done. Usually values are either
strings or Integers. So two different utility methods handle the appropriate
type. The advantage is that this business logic stuff is kept with the app, and
is easy to maintain and edit in development. I am not religious about this. I
just use it when it suits me. Other times I use db tables, other times, enums.
YMMV.
Kieran
On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Mark Wardle wrote:
I've found this interesting.
My problem is I already have 80 entities. For instance, I have an entity
representing structured medical data: as such it has about fifty pick lists
- representing these as separate entities will be a nightmare! Using enums
seems to work well and keeps these items in a private namespace.
I'd not be keen on 80 lookup tables either.
I also find it very convenient to create a NSDictionary with keys and
default values that can be used in awakeFromInsertion - Ive found it a bit
clumsy to start doing fetches to set default values in awakeFromInsertion.
Unless there's a WO-way of doing that.
The other issue is when calculating things.
Using an enum, I can do:
If (reflexPlantarRight == ReflexPlantar.EXTENSOR) {
I've always found checking EO identity a bit clumsy!
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
(Sent from my mobile)
On 15 Apr 2010, at 18:53, Chuck Hill ch...@global-village.net wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:53 AM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:07 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Well, there's only going to be one of each enum in memory. So, that's a
bonus.
Memory is cheap. :-)
They are fast to access... I don't block a thread waiting on a fault.
That's good too. On that same line of thought, there's no need to
prefetch them.
Well, reading in 5 key-value rows from a table can't take all that long,
even if you don't prefetch them. Obviously if they are used thousands of
times in a transaction, then you'll need to speed it up, but I'd optimize
it only if it's actually slowing things down.
Does any of that make a big difference? I don't know. Can't hurt though
(^_^)
Depends on your definition of pain., I guess. :-)
I've always looked at it as a case of if the value is defined only in
code, how do people who are reading the data directly out of the DB know
what the value in the DB means? How do you make everything consistent
between your app and a reporting system reading data out of it?
DBA: Oh hey, this transaction has a status of 1. What does 1 mean? Is it
Active? Is it Closed? What? Now I've got to track down that bleeping
developer and ask him to interpret this data. Would it have been so hard
for him to just include all the context of his application in the DB
where anyone can get at it? It's not like a few 5-row key-value tables
are going to bring the DB to it's knees...
Wait, what is the DBA doing with some dumb DB tools when he has D2JC? (^_~)
I believe the enum prototype in wonder stores them as a string. So,
continuing with Mark's example, your DBA would just see NORMAL,
SIGNS_ONLY, MODERATE, etc. He doesn't see some fk and need to jump to
another table to figure out what that fk happens to be. It sounds like
you're arguing against enumeration entities now (^_^)
But said DBA will then commence whining about non-normalized data.
At least that's what I hear in my head whenever I think about it.
cue: Chuck.
Dave
On Apr 8, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Mark Wardle wrote:
Hi all, please forgive a very simple question but I'd like to create a
lightweight (non-EO) to-one relationship from an EO. I make heavy use
of D2W so I want to fulfil the WO/EOF rules and use to-one
relationship components
I usually create a new entity and have a genuine heavyweight EOF
relationship but I have several properties for which this seems
excessive.
I have an entity (FormEdssFull) which can have a visual field score
for both right and left eye.
Can I do this with a java enum?
public enum VisualAcuity {
NORMAL(0, Normal),
SIGNS_ONLY(1, Signs only:),
MODERATE(2, Moderate),
MARKED(3, Marked);
/* insert enum constructor etc... */
}
and then create the appropriate accessor and mutator in the entity?
What do other people do in these situations?
Many thanks,
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
Cardiff, UK
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list
Re: Basic question - lightweight to-one relationship from entity to POJO/enum
You may want to check out the WireHose Framework, in general, and
com.wirehose.base.WHEOCache, in particular... Regards, André
On 2010-04-15, at 4:52 PM, Mark Wardle wrote:
I've found this interesting.
My problem is I already have 80 entities. For instance, I have an entity
representing structured medical data: as such it has about fifty pick lists -
representing these as separate entities will be a nightmare! Using enums
seems to work well and keeps these items in a private namespace.
I also find it very convenient to create a NSDictionary with keys and default
values that can be used in awakeFromInsertion - Ive found it a bit clumsy to
start doing fetches to set default values in awakeFromInsertion.
Unless there's a WO-way of doing that.
The other issue is when calculating things.
Using an enum, I can do:
If (reflexPlantarRight == ReflexPlantar.EXTENSOR) {
I've always found checking EO identity a bit clumsy!
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
(Sent from my mobile)
On 15 Apr 2010, at 18:53, Chuck Hill ch...@global-village.net wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:53 AM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:07 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Well, there's only going to be one of each enum in memory. So, that's a
bonus.
Memory is cheap. :-)
They are fast to access... I don't block a thread waiting on a fault.
That's good too. On that same line of thought, there's no need to
prefetch them.
Well, reading in 5 key-value rows from a table can't take all that long,
even if you don't prefetch them. Obviously if they are used thousands of
times in a transaction, then you'll need to speed it up, but I'd optimize
it only if it's actually slowing things down.
Does any of that make a big difference? I don't know. Can't hurt though
(^_^)
Depends on your definition of pain., I guess. :-)
I've always looked at it as a case of if the value is defined only in
code, how do people who are reading the data directly out of the DB know
what the value in the DB means? How do you make everything consistent
between your app and a reporting system reading data out of it?
DBA: Oh hey, this transaction has a status of 1. What does 1 mean? Is it
Active? Is it Closed? What? Now I've got to track down that bleeping
developer and ask him to interpret this data. Would it have been so hard
for him to just include all the context of his application in the DB where
anyone can get at it? It's not like a few 5-row key-value tables are going
to bring the DB to it's knees...
Wait, what is the DBA doing with some dumb DB tools when he has D2JC? (^_~)
I believe the enum prototype in wonder stores them as a string. So,
continuing with Mark's example, your DBA would just see NORMAL, SIGNS_ONLY,
MODERATE, etc. He doesn't see some fk and need to jump to another table to
figure out what that fk happens to be. It sounds like you're arguing
against enumeration entities now (^_^)
But said DBA will then commence whining about non-normalized data.
At least that's what I hear in my head whenever I think about it.
cue: Chuck.
Dave
On Apr 8, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Mark Wardle wrote:
Hi all, please forgive a very simple question but I'd like to create a
lightweight (non-EO) to-one relationship from an EO. I make heavy use
of D2W so I want to fulfil the WO/EOF rules and use to-one
relationship components
I usually create a new entity and have a genuine heavyweight EOF
relationship but I have several properties for which this seems
excessive.
I have an entity (FormEdssFull) which can have a visual field score
for both right and left eye.
Can I do this with a java enum?
public enum VisualAcuity {
NORMAL(0, Normal),
SIGNS_ONLY(1, Signs only:),
MODERATE(2, Moderate),
MARKED(3, Marked);
/* insert enum constructor etc... */
}
and then create the appropriate accessor and mutator in the entity?
What do other people do in these situations?
Many thanks,
Mark
--
Dr. Mark Wardle
Specialist registrar, Neurology
Cardiff, UK
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora.com
This email sent to webobje...@avendasora.com
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40mac.com
This email sent to rgur...@mac.com
___
Do not post admin
WOD to Inline
Fellow WO'ers, The inline syntax really makes it easy to refactor existing WOComponents. WOLips has a great inline to wod refactoring feature, but the reverse would be awesome to allow you to take an old clunky WOComponent and make it all inline. There is a jira out there for this feature request, but it only has two votes. If you would like this feature, please click on the vote link. If it gets a lot of votes, the MaSter will know it is worthwhile, if not, it can be cast off into neverland. http://issues.objectstyle.org/jira/browse/WOL-476 Thanks. Kieran ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: no CGI-Executables/WebObjects installed
Went over all the apache config stuff on the wiki, and I think the problem was this directive: Tell wotaskd to Use Localhost Too Edit /System/Library/WebObjects/JavaApplications/wotaskd.woa/Contents/Resources/Properties Add this line after the WOPort=1085 one: WOHost=localhost When I looked at my Properties file, it had a similar line, but it said: WOPort=localhost What's weird is all this worked until my upgrade to Snow Leopard. Could upgrading have caused that line to get changed? Anyway, I changed it to WOHost, and now my app comes up. Now on to the next problem. The app can't find my css file that I keep under /Library/Webserver/Documents. Haven't really debugged this part yet, but wanted to post what I found so far for the previous problem. Jeff On Dec 30, 2009, at 10:42 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: On Dec 30, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Jeff Schmitz wrote: I'm not configuring virtual hosts (that I know of anyway). http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/Running+Through+Apache+-+Leopard+Client+10.5.5+-+Summary I'm trying to set up a Snow Leopard Server deployment machine. Will all this apply? I don't know about all but the directory stuff will. Chuck On Dec 30, 2009, at 9:31 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: I think that your Apache config is messed up. Are you configuring virtual hosts? Check the Directory config here: http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/Web+Applications-Deployment-Apache http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/Running+Through+Apache+-+Leopard+Client+10.5.5+-+Summary Also: http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/dosearchsite.action?searchQuery.queryString=%2Bdirectory+%2BapachesearchQuery.spaceKey=conf_global Chuck On Dec 30, 2009, at 7:08 PM, Jeff Schmitz wrote: Does apache.conf is included in httpd.conf? In /etc/apache2/httpd.conf, you should have this : Include /System/Library/WebObjects/Adaptors/Apache2.2/apache.conf Yes, this has been there all along. and the apache.conf file does exist. Jeff On Dec 30, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: Le 09-12-30 à 18:51, Jeff Schmitz a écrit : Hello, I used migration to migrate my data from a Leopard server to a snow leopard server. I then installed my webobjects app and started it with Monitor for WebObjects. That all seemed to work without problem. However, when I try to navigate to the app with: http://localhost/cgi-bin/WebObjects/netBrackets I get a 404 error. Looking at the httpd error logs I see: script not found or unable to stat: /Library/WebServer/CGI-Executables/WebObjects I then tried to install WO using the installer here: http://support.apple.com/kb/DL688 I restarted apache and am still getting the error. I have verified that the .../CGI-Executables/WebObjects script still does NOT exist. And it shouldn't exist, it should run as a Apache module. Shouldn't this have been installed by the installer? I guess I could copy the one over from my Leopard Server, but I'm afraid perhaps something else didn't get installed correctly. Any suggestions on how to proceed? As a note, I have done the things outlined below: - Download install WO 5.4.3 for 10.5 from ADC - cd /Developer/Examples/JavaWebObjects/Deployment/ - sudo sh configure.sh - Test: http://127.0.0.1:1085 - wotaskd works - Test: http://127.0.0.1:56789 - WOMonitor works - edit /System/Library/WebObjects/Adaptors/Apache2.2/apache.conf : Uncomment Line WebObjectsAdminUsername public Does apache.conf is included in httpd.conf? In /etc/apache2/httpd.conf, you should have this : Include /System/Library/WebObjects/Adaptors/Apache2.2/apache.conf If not, add it and restart Apache. - Restart apache: sudo apachectl restart Thanks, Jeff ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca This email sent to prob...@macti.ca ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net This email sent to ch...@global-village.net -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are
Re: no CGI-Executables/WebObjects installed
On Apr 15, 2010, at 9:10 PM, Jeff Schmitz wrote: Went over all the apache config stuff on the wiki, and I think the problem was this directive: Tell wotaskd to Use Localhost Too Edit /System/Library/WebObjects/JavaApplications/wotaskd.woa/ Contents/Resources/Properties Add this line after the WOPort=1085 one: WOHost=localhost When I looked at my Properties file, it had a similar line, but it said: WOPort=localhost What's weird is all this worked until my upgrade to Snow Leopard. Could upgrading have caused that line to get changed? No, but that line could certainly cause problems! :-) You were just lucky before. Anyway, I changed it to WOHost, and now my app comes up. Now on to the next problem. The app can't find my css file that I keep under /Library/Webserver/Documents. Haven't really debugged this part yet, but wanted to post what I found so far for the previous problem. Jeff On Dec 30, 2009, at 10:42 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: On Dec 30, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Jeff Schmitz wrote: I'm not configuring virtual hosts (that I know of anyway). http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/Running+Through+Apache+-+Leopard+Client+10.5.5+-+Summary I'm trying to set up a Snow Leopard Server deployment machine. Will all this apply? I don't know about all but the directory stuff will. Chuck On Dec 30, 2009, at 9:31 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: I think that your Apache config is messed up. Are you configuring virtual hosts? Check the Directory config here: http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/Web+Applications-Deployment-Apache http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/Running+Through+Apache+-+Leopard+Client+10.5.5+-+Summary Also: http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/dosearchsite.action?searchQuery.queryString=%2Bdirectory+%2BapachesearchQuery.spaceKey=conf_global Chuck On Dec 30, 2009, at 7:08 PM, Jeff Schmitz wrote: Does apache.conf is included in httpd.conf? In /etc/apache2/ httpd.conf, you should have this : Include /System/Library/WebObjects/Adaptors/Apache2.2/ apache.conf Yes, this has been there all along. and the apache.conf file does exist. Jeff On Dec 30, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: Le 09-12-30 à 18:51, Jeff Schmitz a écrit : Hello, I used migration to migrate my data from a Leopard server to a snow leopard server. I then installed my webobjects app and started it with Monitor for WebObjects. That all seemed to work without problem. However, when I try to navigate to the app with: http://localhost/cgi-bin/WebObjects/netBrackets I get a 404 error. Looking at the httpd error logs I see: script not found or unable to stat: /Library/WebServer/CGI- Executables/WebObjects I then tried to install WO using the installer here: http://support.apple.com/kb/DL688 I restarted apache and am still getting the error. I have verified that the .../CGI-Executables/WebObjects script still does NOT exist. And it shouldn't exist, it should run as a Apache module. Shouldn't this have been installed by the installer? I guess I could copy the one over from my Leopard Server, but I'm afraid perhaps something else didn't get installed correctly. Any suggestions on how to proceed? As a note, I have done the things outlined below: - Download install WO 5.4.3 for 10.5 from ADC - cd /Developer/Examples/JavaWebObjects/Deployment/ - sudo sh configure.sh - Test: http://127.0.0.1:1085 - wotaskd works - Test: http://127.0.0.1:56789 - WOMonitor works - edit /System/Library/WebObjects/Adaptors/Apache2.2/ apache.conf : Uncomment Line WebObjectsAdminUsername public Does apache.conf is included in httpd.conf? In /etc/apache2/ httpd.conf, you should have this : Include /System/Library/WebObjects/Adaptors/Apache2.2/ apache.conf If not, add it and restart Apache. - Restart apache: sudo apachectl restart Thanks, Jeff ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects- d...@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca This email sent to prob...@macti.ca ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net This email sent to ch...@global-village.net -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who
