[WISPA] From Today's WSJ...hope this doesn't offend anyone...seems to be pretty straightforward reporting with minimal opinion

2010-05-06 Thread Jeff Broadwick
New U.S. Push to Regulate Internet Access
By AMY SCHATZ

WASHINGTON-In a move that will stoke a battle over the future of the
Internet, the federal government plans to propose regulating broadband lines
under decades-old rules designed for traditional phone networks.

The decision, by Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius
Genachowski, is likely to trigger a vigorous lobbying battle, arraying big
phone and cable companies and their allies on Capitol Hill against Silicon
Valley giants and consumer advocates.

Breaking a deadlock within his agency, Mr. Genachowski is expected Thursday
to outline his plan for regulating broadband lines. He wants to adopt net
neutrality rules that require Internet providers like Comcast Corp. and
ATT Inc. to treat all traffic equally, and not to slow or block access to
websites.

The decision has been eagerly awaited since a federal appeals court ruling
last month cast doubt on the FCC's authority over broadband lines, throwing
into question Mr. Genachowski's proposal to set new rules for how Internet
traffic is managed. The court ruled the FCC had overstepped when it cited
Comcast in 2008 for slowing some customers' Internet traffic.

In a nod to such concerns, the FCC said in a statement that Mr. Genachowski
wouldn't apply the full brunt of existing phone regulations to Internet
lines and that he would set meaningful boundaries to guard against
regulatory overreach.

Some senior Democratic lawmakers provided Mr. Genachowski with political
cover for his decision Wednesday, suggesting they wouldn't be opposed to the
FCC taking the re-regulation route towards net neutrality protections.

The Commission should consider all viable options, wrote Sen. Jay
Rockefeller (D, W.V.), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, and Rep.
Henry Waxman (D, Calif.), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce
Committee, in a letter.

At stake is how far the FCC can go to dictate the way Internet providers
manage traffic on their multibillion-dollar networks. For the past decade or
so, the FCC has maintained a mostly hands-off approach to Internet
regulation.

Internet giants like Google Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and eBay Inc., which want
to offer more Web video and other high-bandwidth services, have called for
stronger action by the FCC to assure free access to websites.

Cable and telecommunications executives have warned that using land-line
phone rules to govern their management of Internet traffic would lead them
to cut billions of capital expenditure for their networks, slash jobs and go
to court to fight the rules.

Consumer groups hailed the decision Wednesday, an abrupt change from recent
days, when they'd bombarded the FCC chairman with emails and phone calls
imploring him to fight phone and cable companies lobbyists.

On the surface it looks like a win for Internet companies, said Rebecca
Arbogast, an analyst with Stifel Nicolaus. A lot will depend on the details
of how this gets implemented.

Mr. Genachowski's proposal will have to go through a modified inquiry and
rule-making process that will likely take months of public comment. But Ms.
Arbogast said the rule is likely to be passed since it has the support of
the two other Democratic commissioners.

President Barack Obama vowed during his campaign to support regulation to
promote so-called net neutrality, and received significant campaign
contributions from Silicon Valley. Mr. Genachowski, a Harvard Law School
buddy of the president, proposed new net neutrality rules as his first major
action as FCC chairman.

Telecom executives say privately that limits on their ability to change
pricing would make it harder to convince shareholders that the returns from
spending billions of dollars on improving a network are worth the cost.

Carriers fear further regulation could handcuff their ability to cope with
the growing demand put on their networks by the explosion in Internet and
wireless data traffic. In particular, they worry that the FCC will require
them to share their networks with rivals at government-regulated rates.

Mike McCurry, former press secretary for President Bill Clinton and co-chair
of the Arts + Labs Coalition, an industry group representing technology
companies, telecom companies and content providers, said the FCC needs to
assert some authority to back up the general net neutrality principles it
outlined in 2005.

The question is how heavy a hand will the regulatory touch be, he said.
We don't know yet, so the devil is in the details. The network operators
have to be able to treat some traffic on the Internet different than other
traffic-most people agree that web video is different than an email to
grandma. You have to discriminate in some fashion.

UBS analyst John Hodulik said the cable companies and carriers were likely
to fight this in court for years and could accelerate their plans to wind
down investment in their broadband networks.

You could have regulators involved in every facet of providing 

Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ...hope this doesn't offend anyone...seems to be pretty straightforward reporting with minimal opinion

2010-05-06 Thread Josh Luthman
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703961104575226583645448758.html

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Jeff Broadwick jeffl...@comcast.net wrote:
 New U.S. Push to Regulate Internet Access
 By AMY SCHATZ

 WASHINGTON-In a move that will stoke a battle over the future of the
 Internet, the federal government plans to propose regulating broadband lines
 under decades-old rules designed for traditional phone networks.

 The decision, by Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius
 Genachowski, is likely to trigger a vigorous lobbying battle, arraying big
 phone and cable companies and their allies on Capitol Hill against Silicon
 Valley giants and consumer advocates.

 Breaking a deadlock within his agency, Mr. Genachowski is expected Thursday
 to outline his plan for regulating broadband lines. He wants to adopt net
 neutrality rules that require Internet providers like Comcast Corp. and
 ATT Inc. to treat all traffic equally, and not to slow or block access to
 websites.

 The decision has been eagerly awaited since a federal appeals court ruling
 last month cast doubt on the FCC's authority over broadband lines, throwing
 into question Mr. Genachowski's proposal to set new rules for how Internet
 traffic is managed. The court ruled the FCC had overstepped when it cited
 Comcast in 2008 for slowing some customers' Internet traffic.

 In a nod to such concerns, the FCC said in a statement that Mr. Genachowski
 wouldn't apply the full brunt of existing phone regulations to Internet
 lines and that he would set meaningful boundaries to guard against
 regulatory overreach.

 Some senior Democratic lawmakers provided Mr. Genachowski with political
 cover for his decision Wednesday, suggesting they wouldn't be opposed to the
 FCC taking the re-regulation route towards net neutrality protections.

 The Commission should consider all viable options, wrote Sen. Jay
 Rockefeller (D, W.V.), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, and Rep.
 Henry Waxman (D, Calif.), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce
 Committee, in a letter.

 At stake is how far the FCC can go to dictate the way Internet providers
 manage traffic on their multibillion-dollar networks. For the past decade or
 so, the FCC has maintained a mostly hands-off approach to Internet
 regulation.

 Internet giants like Google Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and eBay Inc., which want
 to offer more Web video and other high-bandwidth services, have called for
 stronger action by the FCC to assure free access to websites.

 Cable and telecommunications executives have warned that using land-line
 phone rules to govern their management of Internet traffic would lead them
 to cut billions of capital expenditure for their networks, slash jobs and go
 to court to fight the rules.

 Consumer groups hailed the decision Wednesday, an abrupt change from recent
 days, when they'd bombarded the FCC chairman with emails and phone calls
 imploring him to fight phone and cable companies lobbyists.

 On the surface it looks like a win for Internet companies, said Rebecca
 Arbogast, an analyst with Stifel Nicolaus. A lot will depend on the details
 of how this gets implemented.

 Mr. Genachowski's proposal will have to go through a modified inquiry and
 rule-making process that will likely take months of public comment. But Ms.
 Arbogast said the rule is likely to be passed since it has the support of
 the two other Democratic commissioners.

 President Barack Obama vowed during his campaign to support regulation to
 promote so-called net neutrality, and received significant campaign
 contributions from Silicon Valley. Mr. Genachowski, a Harvard Law School
 buddy of the president, proposed new net neutrality rules as his first major
 action as FCC chairman.

 Telecom executives say privately that limits on their ability to change
 pricing would make it harder to convince shareholders that the returns from
 spending billions of dollars on improving a network are worth the cost.

 Carriers fear further regulation could handcuff their ability to cope with
 the growing demand put on their networks by the explosion in Internet and
 wireless data traffic. In particular, they worry that the FCC will require
 them to share their networks with rivals at government-regulated rates.

 Mike McCurry, former press secretary for President Bill Clinton and co-chair
 of the Arts + Labs Coalition, an industry group representing technology
 companies, telecom companies and content providers, said the FCC needs to
 assert some authority to back up the general net neutrality principles it
 outlined in 2005.

 The question is how heavy a hand will the regulatory touch be, he said.
 We don't know yet, so the devil is in the details. The network operators
 have to be able to 

[WISPA] Alright, whodunit?

2010-05-06 Thread Jeremy Parr
http://www.witn.com/home/headlines/92972524.html

A fire tower in Craven County is on fire.

Smoke and some flames are coming out of the top of the fire tower on old
U.S. 70 in Tuscarora. That road is currently shut down.

Fire crews used a ladder truck to get water to the top of the tower, which
is about 125 off the ground. We're told a fire hydrant right next to the
fire tower is not working so firefighters are having to truck in water.

The fire department says a worker was installing Wi-Fi in the tower when a
breaker tripped and started the fire. No on was hurt.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Alright, whodunit?

2010-05-06 Thread Bret Clark
Well...now I know what the tech meant when he told me the signal should
be smoking hot! 

On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 13:16 -0500, Jeremy Parr wrote:

 http://www.witn.com/home/headlines/92972524.html
 
 A fire tower in Craven County is on fire.
 
 Smoke and some flames are coming out of the top of the fire tower on old
 U.S. 70 in Tuscarora. That road is currently shut down.
 
 Fire crews used a ladder truck to get water to the top of the tower, which
 is about 125 off the ground. We're told a fire hydrant right next to the
 fire tower is not working so firefighters are having to truck in water.
 
 The fire department says a worker was installing Wi-Fi in the tower when a
 breaker tripped and started the fire. No on was hurt.
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Alright, whodunit?

2010-05-06 Thread Bob Moldashel
Has anyone seen Marlon?   :-P

-B-

Jeremy Parr wrote:
 http://www.witn.com/home/headlines/92972524.html

 A fire tower in Craven County is on fire.

 Smoke and some flames are coming out of the top of the fire tower on old
 U.S. 70 in Tuscarora. That road is currently shut down.

 Fire crews used a ladder truck to get water to the top of the tower, which
 is about 125 off the ground. We're told a fire hydrant right next to the
 fire tower is not working so firefighters are having to truck in water.

 The fire department says a worker was installing Wi-Fi in the tower when a
 breaker tripped and started the fire. No on was hurt.


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] [OT] Chicken Currency

2010-05-06 Thread Mike Hammett
I love that story.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 4/25/2010 12:24 AM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
 95% of the members of this list are probably not familiar with an old
 WISPCON story that had to do with chickens being currency in Latvia and
 how I love to throw some abuse at the Mikrotik guys about this when I
 see them.   For those 5% though, I think you will appreciate that
 perhaps the Latvians are actually ahead of us:

 http://lowdenplan.com/

 The full Mikrotik chicken story is at the end of this email, for those
 of you who might be interested.

 Matt Larsen
 vistabeam.com

 The Mikrotik Chickens story

 During one of the Chicago WISPCONs (4 or 5, I believe) we had an
 off-campus excursion that involved limosines, liquor and late night
 activities.   At one point in the evening, I was in a limo with Arnis
 from Mikrotik.   For those who don't know him, Arnis is a very
 softspoken and intelligent guy.   The rest of the people in the limo
 were pretty loud and raucus, while Arnis mostly sat quietly and
 watched.   At some point in the conversation, John Scrivner asked him
 what the gentlemen's clubs in Latvia were like.   At the same time,
 someone else was talking about getting some fried chicken and coming up
 with money to get it.   Between the two conversations, I thought that
 something was said about chickens being used as currency in Latvia.
 Smart ass that I am, I thought I'd make a comment:

 Me:  Hey John, what's the worst thing about a Latvian gentleman's club?
 John:  I don't know.
 Me:  Slipping the chickens into the dancer's G-string!

   From that point on, I have been quite boorishly giving the Mikrotik
 guys the business about chickens as currency.   A picture of a chicken
 in a hotel lobby became the Latvian Express Card.   An order of wings
 is pocket change  Etc etc.   It has been an endless source of
 amusement for me, and not particularly funny to anyone else.

 Arnis got me at the last MUM.   He saw my business name (Vistabeam) and
 started laughing at me.   I asked him what was so funny.   He said that
 Vista means chicken in Latvian.   So the Latvian version of my
 business name is Chicken Wireless.Of course, this turned out to be
 total BS, but I didn't get it figured out until a week later when I went
 online and figured out that the Latvian word for chicken is calis.

 Well played Arnis.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout

2010-05-06 Thread Mike Hammett
I'm not sure why WISPs resell DSL is any significant capacity.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


On 4/26/2010 11:31 AM, Ryan Ghering wrote:
 CenturyLink has the worst billing system in the country. We resell DSL
 through them, let me tell you its a nightmare.
 Takes a few months to get new customers on the billing worksheet, and even
 longer to get them off, its a daily fight to get credits for over billing,
 AND our per customer bill rate was supposed to be changed over 18 months
 ago, and they JUST changed it 2 months ago. Cost us 30k on over billing that
 they refuse to credit back now. I could go on and on but its just not what I
 want to rant on today :)..

 The boss and I had a great conversation on Friday.. all about moving every
 DSL customer we have over to our wireless network.
 Now is the time for any qwest or CTEL reseller to get off their networks.

 Happy Monday!!

 Ryan

 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Josh Luthman
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:


 If anyone has multiple PSTN lines at multiple addresses read this!

 I had a customer with two PSTN lines at two addresses - one was a gas
 station, the other an office.  After the merger/buyout/whatever they split
 the bills and left the office one on autopay but the other line was left
 there to rack up a bill.  They never send paper bills on their own - you
 have to fight to the bone to get one.  Took a few hours but they did manage
 to combine the two lines in to one account again.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Marlon K. Schafero...@odessaoffice.com
  
 wrote:

  
 yeah.

 I spent 40 minutes on the phone just trying to get to a support person

 that
  
 could help with a business grade dsl line the other day.

 The first company that I called (the support line that showed on the
 internet) said that they (CenturyLink) didn't have any record of the
 account.  They sent me to CenturyTel (who answered the phone as
 CenturyLink).

 Gonna be great for MY business if they keep doing things the way that

 they
  
 are!
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Ryan Gheringrgher...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout


 I live and work in CenturyHell land.. I can tell you this, as of today
 we are now looking for alternative options of all our ds3's.
 Including those that cross connect into qwest. If they kill support at
 qwest for high-cap services like they did their own, its gona be hell
 on all of us that have qwest connections.

 Ryan

 On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeremie Chismjchi...@gmail.com

 wrote:
  
 It has been heading that way for a while. When they sold the wiress to
 alltel there were a lot of cuts which didn't go over well. Then the
 embarq merger has some wondering what their job responsibilities are
 and if they will have a job. I was at the corporate office a few weeks
 ago and the mood was very negative.

 I have been getting quite a few of their phone customers that are
 unhappy. Not to mention centurytel is a nightmare to port from. ATT
 takes 10 days. Centurytel can take up to 120 days.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Jack Ungerjun...@ask-wi.com  wrote:

  
 Jeremie,

 Is there one overall reason why employees hate it? What is
 CenturyTel doing wrong?

 jack


 Jeremie Chism wrote:

 I live in Monroe, worked for centurytel for over 5 years. Everyone I
 know that works there now hates it. Most are looking for new jobs.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Randy Cosbydco...@infowest.com
 wrote:


  
 http://news.qwest.com/centurylinkqwestmerger

 *MONROE, La. and DENVER, Co. -- April 22, 2010* -- CenturyLink
 (CenturyTel, Inc., NYSE: CTL) and Qwest Communications (NYSE: Q)
 announced today that their boards of directors have approved a
 definitive agreement under which CenturyLink will acquire Qwest in a
 tax-free, stock-for-stock transaction. ...

 --
 Randy Cosby
 Vice President
 InfoWest, Inc

 435-674-0165 x 2010

 http://www.infowest.com/

 Letting off steam always produces more heat than light. - Neal A.
 Maxwell



 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA 

Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout

2010-05-06 Thread Jeromie Reeves
Because dsl has more bandwidth available to it? It can let you bring
extra capacity into relay sites, offload constant transfers, etc.
Otherwise,I agree. The cost is crazy high (more then buying the same
loop + net from the telco). Its a tool, use it where right.

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
 I'm not sure why WISPs resell DSL is any significant capacity.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 On 4/26/2010 11:31 AM, Ryan Ghering wrote:
 CenturyLink has the worst billing system in the country. We resell DSL
 through them, let me tell you its a nightmare.
 Takes a few months to get new customers on the billing worksheet, and even
 longer to get them off, its a daily fight to get credits for over billing,
 AND our per customer bill rate was supposed to be changed over 18 months
 ago, and they JUST changed it 2 months ago. Cost us 30k on over billing that
 they refuse to credit back now. I could go on and on but its just not what I
 want to rant on today :)..

 The boss and I had a great conversation on Friday.. all about moving every
 DSL customer we have over to our wireless network.
 Now is the time for any qwest or CTEL reseller to get off their networks.

 Happy Monday!!

 Ryan

 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Josh Luthman
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:


 If anyone has multiple PSTN lines at multiple addresses read this!

 I had a customer with two PSTN lines at two addresses - one was a gas
 station, the other an office.  After the merger/buyout/whatever they split
 the bills and left the office one on autopay but the other line was left
 there to rack up a bill.  They never send paper bills on their own - you
 have to fight to the bone to get one.  Took a few hours but they did manage
 to combine the two lines in to one account again.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Marlon K. Schafero...@odessaoffice.com

 wrote:


 yeah.

 I spent 40 minutes on the phone just trying to get to a support person

 that

 could help with a business grade dsl line the other day.

 The first company that I called (the support line that showed on the
 internet) said that they (CenturyLink) didn't have any record of the
 account.  They sent me to CenturyTel (who answered the phone as
 CenturyLink).

 Gonna be great for MY business if they keep doing things the way that

 they

 are!
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Ryan Gheringrgher...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout


 I live and work in CenturyHell land.. I can tell you this, as of today
 we are now looking for alternative options of all our ds3's.
 Including those that cross connect into qwest. If they kill support at
 qwest for high-cap services like they did their own, its gona be hell
 on all of us that have qwest connections.

 Ryan

 On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeremie Chismjchi...@gmail.com

 wrote:

 It has been heading that way for a while. When they sold the wiress to
 alltel there were a lot of cuts which didn't go over well. Then the
 embarq merger has some wondering what their job responsibilities are
 and if they will have a job. I was at the corporate office a few weeks
 ago and the mood was very negative.

 I have been getting quite a few of their phone customers that are
 unhappy. Not to mention centurytel is a nightmare to port from. ATT
 takes 10 days. Centurytel can take up to 120 days.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Jack Ungerjun...@ask-wi.com  wrote:


 Jeremie,

 Is there one overall reason why employees hate it? What is
 CenturyTel doing wrong?

 jack


 Jeremie Chism wrote:

 I live in Monroe, worked for centurytel for over 5 years. Everyone I
 know that works there now hates it. Most are looking for new jobs.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Randy Cosbydco...@infowest.com
 wrote:



 http://news.qwest.com/centurylinkqwestmerger

 *MONROE, La. and DENVER, Co. -- April 22, 2010* -- CenturyLink
 (CenturyTel, Inc., NYSE: CTL) and Qwest Communications (NYSE: Q)
 announced today that their boards of directors have approved a
 definitive agreement under which CenturyLink will acquire Qwest in a
 tax-free, stock-for-stock transaction. ...

 --
 Randy Cosby
 Vice President
 InfoWest, Inc

 435-674-0165 x 2010

 http://www.infowest.com/

 Letting off steam always produces more heat than light. - Neal A.
 Maxwell



 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org


Re: [WISPA] [OT] Chicken Currency

2010-05-06 Thread Jeff Broadwick
LOL, I still am sore that they wouldn't let us borrow their chicken picture
(that was in Dallas)! 


Regards,

Jeff


Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484 x106  (Int'l)

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:39 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [OT] Chicken Currency

I love that story.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 4/25/2010 12:24 AM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
 95% of the members of this list are probably not familiar with an old 
 WISPCON story that had to do with chickens being currency in Latvia 
 and how I love to throw some abuse at the Mikrotik guys about this when I
 see them.   For those 5% though, I think you will appreciate that
 perhaps the Latvians are actually ahead of us:

 http://lowdenplan.com/

 The full Mikrotik chicken story is at the end of this email, for those 
 of you who might be interested.

 Matt Larsen
 vistabeam.com

 The Mikrotik Chickens story

 During one of the Chicago WISPCONs (4 or 5, I believe) we had an 
 off-campus excursion that involved limosines, liquor and late night
 activities.   At one point in the evening, I was in a limo with Arnis
 from Mikrotik.   For those who don't know him, Arnis is a very
 softspoken and intelligent guy.   The rest of the people in the limo
 were pretty loud and raucus, while Arnis mostly sat quietly and
 watched.   At some point in the conversation, John Scrivner asked him
 what the gentlemen's clubs in Latvia were like.   At the same time,
 someone else was talking about getting some fried chicken and coming up
 with money to get it.   Between the two conversations, I thought that
 something was said about chickens being used as currency in Latvia.
 Smart ass that I am, I thought I'd make a comment:

 Me:  Hey John, what's the worst thing about a Latvian gentleman's club?
 John:  I don't know.
 Me:  Slipping the chickens into the dancer's G-string!

   From that point on, I have been quite boorishly giving the Mikrotik
 guys the business about chickens as currency.   A picture of a chicken
 in a hotel lobby became the Latvian Express Card.   An order of wings
 is pocket change  Etc etc.   It has been an endless source of
 amusement for me, and not particularly funny to anyone else.

 Arnis got me at the last MUM.   He saw my business name (Vistabeam) and
 started laughing at me.   I asked him what was so funny.   He said that
 Vista means chicken in Latvian.   So the Latvian version of my
 business name is Chicken Wireless.Of course, this turned out to be
 total BS, but I didn't get it figured out until a week later when I 
 went online and figured out that the Latvian word for chicken is calis.

 Well played Arnis.



 --
 --
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --
 --

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] New WISP

2010-05-06 Thread Mike Hammett
Most of my repeater sites are about $150 - $200 more than the CPE.  I 
upgrade to a 433 from a 411, add another radio, bulkhead pigtail, 
jumper, cheap omni or sector.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 4/27/2010 10:19 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 All of my repeater sites have 0 infrastructure cost.  I'm using a TV tower,
 grain leg, etc.  This means the only additional cost is a NEMA box, cheap
 battery, mt box and omni.  Roughly $400.  If I get one customer at 35/mo it
 takes a year for ROI.  Two customers six months, etc.  I typically charge
 45/mo and get 3 people a day after the AP is up.  Looking at my third screen
 I've three repeater sites (at least) with only three subs.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Marlon K. 
 Schafero...@odessaoffice.comwrote:


 15 per ap?  Man I WISH I could do that out here!

 I barely break even on a site at 15 subs.  (I really hate the sites with 3
 to 5 subs on them :-(  ).

 I think my highest site is up to 76 subs or so.  Got a couple of them like
 that.  They are certainly feeling the strain but we're out of channels in
 2.4.

 For the busier sites I've started to install 5.8 gig systems over the top
 of
 the 2.4 and charge a little more for it.  So far people would still rather
 go with the cheaper stuff even though it's much less consistent in it's
 performance.

 For one site I have finally broken down and just install the 5.8 and sell
 it
 at the same price as the 2.4 just so that I can get people moved.

 Now if I could just get more/cheaper backhaul out here.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP


 Several little repeater sites I have are Mikrotik APs and Ubiquiti CPEs.
   No
 more then 15 stations on each AP off the top of my head.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Chuck Hoggch...@shelbybb.com  wrote:

  
 Hi Liam:

 We are a WISPA Vendor and the largest WISP in KY (just an hour or so
 away from you).

 I'm not exactly sure what you are after, but I am guessing it is the
 billing software?  We have decided to use Platypus from Tucows after
 many issues with our homegrown alternative.  We are in the
 implementation phase, so we'll let you know how that goes.

 We have extensive knowledge and have used Trango, Ubiquiti, MikroTik,
 Tranzeo, and Motorola Canopy.  Hands down, Motorola Canopy handles the
 most clients with the best throughput.  Ubiquiti and MikroTik are a
 somewhat cheaper alternative, but work well in low-sub count situations.

 Feel free to give DJ a call, 800-405-9865 and he can guide you in the
 right direction.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Liam Cummings
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:50 PM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] New WISP

 Hi all,

 We are a technologies solutions company located in Cincinnati and trying
 to become a WISP. We are running into two road blocks.

 1 - We need to choose software that doesn't need a coder to operate

 2 - Choosing the right access points and other equipment



 We would love to here your thoughts.



 Any input would be much appreciated! :-)





 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
  
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 

Re: [WISPA] New WISP

2010-05-06 Thread Josh Luthman
Are you saying you have two radios in the 433?  Are they the same band?

The 411 and 433 share the same horsepower, in case anyone didn't recognize that.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
 Most of my repeater sites are about $150 - $200 more than the CPE.  I
 upgrade to a 433 from a 411, add another radio, bulkhead pigtail,
 jumper, cheap omni or sector.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 On 4/27/2010 10:19 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 All of my repeater sites have 0 infrastructure cost.  I'm using a TV tower,
 grain leg, etc.  This means the only additional cost is a NEMA box, cheap
 battery, mt box and omni.  Roughly $400.  If I get one customer at 35/mo it
 takes a year for ROI.  Two customers six months, etc.  I typically charge
 45/mo and get 3 people a day after the AP is up.  Looking at my third screen
 I've three repeater sites (at least) with only three subs.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Marlon K. 
 Schafero...@odessaoffice.comwrote:


 15 per ap?  Man I WISH I could do that out here!

 I barely break even on a site at 15 subs.  (I really hate the sites with 3
 to 5 subs on them :-(  ).

 I think my highest site is up to 76 subs or so.  Got a couple of them like
 that.  They are certainly feeling the strain but we're out of channels in
 2.4.

 For the busier sites I've started to install 5.8 gig systems over the top
 of
 the 2.4 and charge a little more for it.  So far people would still rather
 go with the cheaper stuff even though it's much less consistent in it's
 performance.

 For one site I have finally broken down and just install the 5.8 and sell
 it
 at the same price as the 2.4 just so that I can get people moved.

 Now if I could just get more/cheaper backhaul out here.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP


 Several little repeater sites I have are Mikrotik APs and Ubiquiti CPEs.
   No
 more then 15 stations on each AP off the top of my head.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Chuck Hoggch...@shelbybb.com  wrote:


 Hi Liam:

 We are a WISPA Vendor and the largest WISP in KY (just an hour or so
 away from you).

 I'm not exactly sure what you are after, but I am guessing it is the
 billing software?  We have decided to use Platypus from Tucows after
 many issues with our homegrown alternative.  We are in the
 implementation phase, so we'll let you know how that goes.

 We have extensive knowledge and have used Trango, Ubiquiti, MikroTik,
 Tranzeo, and Motorola Canopy.  Hands down, Motorola Canopy handles the
 most clients with the best throughput.  Ubiquiti and MikroTik are a
 somewhat cheaper alternative, but work well in low-sub count situations.

 Feel free to give DJ a call, 800-405-9865 and he can guide you in the
 right direction.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Liam Cummings
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:50 PM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] New WISP

 Hi all,

 We are a technologies solutions company located in Cincinnati and trying
 to become a WISP. We are running into two road blocks.

 1 - We need to choose software that doesn't need a coder to operate

 2 - Choosing the right access points and other equipment



 We would love to here your thoughts.



 Any input would be much appreciated! :-)





 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 

[WISPA] POE powered Switch?

2010-05-06 Thread Gino Villarini
Anyone?

 

Gino A. Villarini

g...@aeronetpr.com

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

787.273.4143

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] POE powered Switch?

2010-05-06 Thread Josh Luthman
There is already a thread about this on the moto list.  What is the application?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
 Anyone?



 Gino A. Villarini

 g...@aeronetpr.com

 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

 787.273.4143





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] MT PtP

2010-05-06 Thread Mike Hammett
This is the first I've heard of N-Streme working on Prism.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 4/28/2010 12:11 PM, Blair Davis wrote:
 Works on Prism, but ALL cards connected to AP must be Prism

 Josh Luthman wrote:
 Pretty sure it's just Atheros.

 Haven't tried nstreme and Prism...

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Robert 
 Westrobert.w...@just-micro.comwrote:


 Wait, N-Stream will work with non-mikrotik cards?  I thought it was locked
 into only MT cards?

 Bob-


 -Original Message-
 From:wireless-boun...@wispa.org  [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Robert West
 Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 11:58 AM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT PtP

 What about N-stream with 900Mhz?  Is that just asking for trouble?

 Bob-



 -Original Message-
 From:wireless-boun...@wispa.org  [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
 Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 10:23 AM
 To:aajayi...@as-technologies.com; 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT PtP

 What 350mw card are you using? I wouldn't use anything less than XR5 or R5H
 because their receive sensitivity is so much better. Plus you will use MMCX
 connectors with these two cards which is going to save you a lot of
 headaches over u.fl. Also definitely turn on N-stream. I had a link that
 was
 bouncing around between 75-90% ccq and couldn't ever get it up higher than
 that. As soon as I turned on N-stream my ccq went to 100/100%. And
 modulation locks itself at 54/54 all day long.

 Kurt Fankhauser
 WAVELINC
 P.O. Box 126
 Bucyrus, OH 44820
 419-562-6405
 www.wavelinc.com



 -Original Message-
 From:wireless-boun...@wispa.org  [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Akinlolu Ajayi-Obe
 Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 2:23 AM
 To:wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] MT PtP

 I want to setup an MT point to point using two MT 411 boards, 350mw cards
 and a 23db rootena. Distance is 7km. Is there anything I need to tweak or
 watch out for? New to MT. I have setup a basic link and tested in the
 office.

 Thanks
 Akin
 Sent from my BlackBerryR smartphone



 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 

 WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 

 WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 

 WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] New WISP

2010-05-06 Thread Mike Hammett
I can't find the email now, but Jer sold his wireless operations.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 4/28/2010 1:18 PM, Stuart Pierce wrote:
 Larry , Shmary, he don't know jack about running a xISP. Just kidding, Larry 
 knows more about being an xISP than Jer.

 ;)

 -- Original Message --
 From: Robert Westrobert.w...@just-micro.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Date:  Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:32:13 -0400


 Larry is correct.  I've went towards Mikrotik in these instances due to the
 overwhelming amount of Go To people and a Wiki on just about anything
 Mikrotik out there.  Not to mention the cut and paste drop in scripts
 available.

 Bob-


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Larry Yunker
 Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 9:29 AM
 To: 'WISPA General List'
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP


 I agree that Coding is not equal to Networking.  But as I noted...
 programming IOS or even chucking in routes using command-line on Mikrotik
 looks like coding.

 I guess my point was that if you want to start a WISP, be prepared to get
 your hands dirty.  At some point, you are likely to find the need to use a
 language whether it be IOS, Mikrotik-scripting, Bash, C-Shell, or even
 Microsoft NT batch language.

 - Larry

 -Original Message-
 From: Josh Luthman [mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 5:33 PM
 To: leyun...@wispadvantage.com; WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP

 Coding != networking :)

 On 4/27/10, Larry Yunkerleyun...@wispadvantage.com  wrote:
  
 For what it is worth... running a successful WISP will require a certain
 level of technical expertise and probably a coder.

 Anyone can throw up a simple access point with a tall antenna and connect

 it
  
 to a LAN, but to grow and reach any sizeable market, you are going to need
 someone that knows how to configure routing between access points and that
 will look a lot like coding.

 Additionally, you will learn that with most solutions, access control,
 network monitoring and bandwidth management all require some coding.
 Very few out-of-the-box solutions exist that provide for all of these
 aspects of WISP operation.

 Regards,
 Larry Yunker


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Liam Cummings
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:50 PM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] New WISP

 Hi all,

 We are a technologies solutions company located in Cincinnati and trying
 to become a WISP. We are running into two road blocks.

 1 - We need to choose software that doesn't need a coder to operate

 2 - Choosing the right access points and other equipment



 We would love to here your thoughts.



 Any input would be much appreciated! :-)







 
  
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 
  
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 
  
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 -- 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
 continue that counts.
 --- Winston Churchill



 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

  





 
 Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net






 

Re: [WISPA] POE powered Switch?

2010-05-06 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
For 802.3af compliant .

The 3Com Intellijack Series.
Linksys / CISCO SLM2008  or SLM2005
*Catalyst 2960PD-8TT-L


*Non-Standard POE powered capable.
Mikrotik 750 / 750g
other Mikrotik Boards
Small Linksys
Small Dlink
(Using a poe injector kit)

Does this help you ?

Faisal


On 5/6/2010 5:25 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
 Anyone?



 Gino A. Villarini

 g...@aeronetpr.com

 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

 787.273.4143





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] New WISP

2010-05-06 Thread Mike Hammett
Usually 5.8 to the tower, and 5.2 for the repeater.  I haven't done any 
repeaters like this since DFS.  I do have a couple at 2.4.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 5/6/2010 4:22 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 Are you saying you have two radios in the 433?  Are they the same band?

 The 411 and 433 share the same horsepower, in case anyone didn't recognize 
 that.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
 continue that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill



 On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Mike Hammettwispawirel...@ics-il.net  wrote:

 Most of my repeater sites are about $150 - $200 more than the CPE.  I
 upgrade to a 433 from a 411, add another radio, bulkhead pigtail,
 jumper, cheap omni or sector.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 On 4/27/2010 10:19 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
  
 All of my repeater sites have 0 infrastructure cost.  I'm using a TV tower,
 grain leg, etc.  This means the only additional cost is a NEMA box, cheap
 battery, mt box and omni.  Roughly $400.  If I get one customer at 35/mo it
 takes a year for ROI.  Two customers six months, etc.  I typically charge
 45/mo and get 3 people a day after the AP is up.  Looking at my third screen
 I've three repeater sites (at least) with only three subs.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Marlon K. 
 Schafero...@odessaoffice.comwrote:



 15 per ap?  Man I WISH I could do that out here!

 I barely break even on a site at 15 subs.  (I really hate the sites with 3
 to 5 subs on them :-(  ).

 I think my highest site is up to 76 subs or so.  Got a couple of them like
 that.  They are certainly feeling the strain but we're out of channels in
 2.4.

 For the busier sites I've started to install 5.8 gig systems over the top
 of
 the 2.4 and charge a little more for it.  So far people would still rather
 go with the cheaper stuff even though it's much less consistent in it's
 performance.

 For one site I have finally broken down and just install the 5.8 and sell
 it
 at the same price as the 2.4 just so that I can get people moved.

 Now if I could just get more/cheaper backhaul out here.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP


 Several little repeater sites I have are Mikrotik APs and Ubiquiti CPEs.
No
 more then 15 stations on each AP off the top of my head.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Chuck Hoggch...@shelbybb.comwrote:


  
 Hi Liam:

 We are a WISPA Vendor and the largest WISP in KY (just an hour or so
 away from you).

 I'm not exactly sure what you are after, but I am guessing it is the
 billing software?  We have decided to use Platypus from Tucows after
 many issues with our homegrown alternative.  We are in the
 implementation phase, so we'll let you know how that goes.

 We have extensive knowledge and have used Trango, Ubiquiti, MikroTik,
 Tranzeo, and Motorola Canopy.  Hands down, Motorola Canopy handles the
 most clients with the best throughput.  Ubiquiti and MikroTik are a
 somewhat cheaper alternative, but work well in low-sub count situations.

 Feel free to give DJ a call, 800-405-9865 and he can guide you in the
 right direction.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Liam Cummings
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:50 PM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] New WISP

 Hi all,

 We are a technologies solutions company located in Cincinnati and trying
 to become a WISP. We are running into two road blocks.

 1 - We need to choose software that doesn't need a coder to operate

 2 - Choosing the right access points and other equipment



 We would love to here your thoughts.



 Any input would be much appreciated! :-)





 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 

Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout

2010-05-06 Thread Mike Hammett
I'll show you a Rocket M5 that has more capacity than entire DSLAMs 
around here.  As wireless gear gets faster and faster while telco 
provided service remains the same, the place for DSL is becoming less.  
I won't disagree with your tool comment, but a hammer makes a better 
striking device than a screwdriver.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 5/6/2010 3:00 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
 Because dsl has more bandwidth available to it? It can let you bring
 extra capacity into relay sites, offload constant transfers, etc.
 Otherwise,I agree. The cost is crazy high (more then buying the same
 loop + net from the telco). Its a tool, use it where right.

 On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Mike Hammettwispawirel...@ics-il.net  
 wrote:

 I'm not sure why WISPs resell DSL is any significant capacity.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 On 4/26/2010 11:31 AM, Ryan Ghering wrote:
  
 CenturyLink has the worst billing system in the country. We resell DSL
 through them, let me tell you its a nightmare.
 Takes a few months to get new customers on the billing worksheet, and even
 longer to get them off, its a daily fight to get credits for over billing,
 AND our per customer bill rate was supposed to be changed over 18 months
 ago, and they JUST changed it 2 months ago. Cost us 30k on over billing that
 they refuse to credit back now. I could go on and on but its just not what I
 want to rant on today :)..

 The boss and I had a great conversation on Friday.. all about moving every
 DSL customer we have over to our wireless network.
 Now is the time for any qwest or CTEL reseller to get off their networks.

 Happy Monday!!

 Ryan

 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Josh Luthman
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:



 If anyone has multiple PSTN lines at multiple addresses read this!

 I had a customer with two PSTN lines at two addresses - one was a gas
 station, the other an office.  After the merger/buyout/whatever they split
 the bills and left the office one on autopay but the other line was left
 there to rack up a bill.  They never send paper bills on their own - you
 have to fight to the bone to get one.  Took a few hours but they did manage
 to combine the two lines in to one account again.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Marlon K. Schafero...@odessaoffice.com

  
 wrote:


  
 yeah.

 I spent 40 minutes on the phone just trying to get to a support person


 that

  
 could help with a business grade dsl line the other day.

 The first company that I called (the support line that showed on the
 internet) said that they (CenturyLink) didn't have any record of the
 account.  They sent me to CenturyTel (who answered the phone as
 CenturyLink).

 Gonna be great for MY business if they keep doing things the way that


 they

  
 are!
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Ryan Gheringrgher...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout


 I live and work in CenturyHell land.. I can tell you this, as of today
 we are now looking for alternative options of all our ds3's.
 Including those that cross connect into qwest. If they kill support at
 qwest for high-cap services like they did their own, its gona be hell
 on all of us that have qwest connections.

 Ryan

 On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeremie Chismjchi...@gmail.com


 wrote:

  
 It has been heading that way for a while. When they sold the wiress to
 alltel there were a lot of cuts which didn't go over well. Then the
 embarq merger has some wondering what their job responsibilities are
 and if they will have a job. I was at the corporate office a few weeks
 ago and the mood was very negative.

 I have been getting quite a few of their phone customers that are
 unhappy. Not to mention centurytel is a nightmare to port from. ATT
 takes 10 days. Centurytel can take up to 120 days.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Jack Ungerjun...@ask-wi.comwrote:


  
 Jeremie,

 Is there one overall reason why employees hate it? What is
 CenturyTel doing wrong?

 jack


 Jeremie Chism wrote:


 I live in Monroe, worked for centurytel for over 5 years. Everyone I
 know that works there now hates it. Most are looking for new jobs.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Randy Cosbydco...@infowest.com
 wrote:



  
 http://news.qwest.com/centurylinkqwestmerger

 *MONROE, La. and DENVER, Co. -- April 22, 2010* -- CenturyLink
 (CenturyTel, Inc., NYSE: CTL) and Qwest Communications (NYSE: Q)
 announced 

Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices. Nothealthcare, taxes or government related.........

2010-05-06 Thread Mike Hammett
MTI is damn good quality.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 4/29/2010 8:17 PM, Robert West wrote:
 I hear ya.  I will gladly pay extra now to not have to go back over and
 over.  Pays 10X in the long run.

 I prefer goo quality. :)

 I'll give it a look to be sure.

 Bob-


 - Original Message -
 From: Jeremie Chismjchi...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:11 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices.
 Nothealthcare, taxes or government related.



 Tiltek dual polarity 900 MHz.  I have had 8 up for 2.5 years with no
 problem. Not the cheapest but definitely goo quality. I like to use
 equipment that I don't have to go back to.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Robert Westrobert.w...@just-
 micro.com  wrote:

  
 I'm in need of a 120 or a couple of 90 degree 900MHz H-POL sector
 antenna(s).  Not looking forward to buying worthless CRAP just
 because I've never had to buy these before so I'm asking who uses
 what and if it works great.  I've done the Omni path, okay but
 noisy, but this new install needs some decent signal for 2 to 4
 miles.  Mostly clear path but, ofcourse , into the trees to the CPEs.

 I've looked at the Super Pass solution and as we all know, I'm a
 cheap SOB so it fits my budget but I'd gladly pay bigger $$$ for top
 quality if it's deserved.

 Thanks.

 Bob-

 The cheap SOB





 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] New WISP

2010-05-06 Thread Mike Hammett
I'm the exact opposite, I prefer the ECS (the one with the RJ-45) and 
hate the pass-through one.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 4/30/2010 8:59 AM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
 I do have to tape the outside connections Mike.

 But instead of running a pigtail with a bulkhead connector I run an n-f/f
 bulkhead connector and n-m pigtials.  Gotta tape up the antenna connection
 ONCE.  After that, if you change out the radios etc. and need a different
 pigtail just unscrew the pigtail and your golden.

 I also run boxes quite a bit bigger than I need.  1'x1'x2 or so.  That way
 I've got a lot of room to move things around, use different boards etc.  My
 *plan* is to not have to change out the boxes anymore.

 One of the nicest things I've found in a long time is the Pac Wireless
 pass-through ethernet grip tight.  Not the goofy one that requires a
 screwdriver or little kid to release the tab on the connector.  The one that
 allows the whole cat5 cable to fit through with the connector already on it.
 Very nice design.

   Lastly I've been REALLY happy with the Shireen double insulated cat5 with
 no gel.  Instead of a gel it has a paperish wrapping around the wires that
 somehow expands and seals things when /if it gets wet.  This cable is a LOT
 easier to deal with than the old fashioned grease filled ones!

 laters,
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Mikem...@aweiowa.com
 To: 'WISPA General List'wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:46 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP



 Marlon:

 I am very interested in your no more taping bulkhead connector.  Do you
 mean on the NEMA box?  What do you use?

 Friendly Regards,

 Mike


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
 Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:36 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP

 That's way more than $400 for a repeater site.

 I don't pay monthly rent of most of them either, but it still costs to
 build

 one.

 Good water tight box, $200+.

 Coax, $1 per foot or so.  $12 each for connectors (unless you buy the
 cheap
 junky ones then it's still $4 to $6 each).

 MT 433 AH board, $100ish

 XR2 card $100 ish

 Pigtail, $15 to $25

 Bulkhead connector (NO more untaping connectors just to install a new
 radio) $15 to $25 for the good ones with the o-ring and stainless
 construction.

 Battery backup $100+

 Ethernet switch $50 to $100

 Backhaul to the tower, $200+

 Any electrical wiring to be done?  $$$

 I guess if you use the cheapest of the cheap gear you could get the cost
 of
 a repeater below $800 or $1000 but you'll soon find yourself working a lot
 harder than you should to keep it running right.  Been there done that.

 As I've said before, 1001 ways to depelt that feline.
 Marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:19 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP


 All of my repeater sites have 0 infrastructure cost.  I'm using a TV
 tower,
 grain leg, etc.  This means the only additional cost is a NEMA box, cheap
 battery, mt box and omni.  Roughly $400.  If I get one customer at 35/mo
 it
 takes a year for ROI.  Two customers six months, etc.  I typically charge
 45/mo and get 3 people a day after the AP is up.  Looking at my third
 screen
 I've three repeater sites (at least) with only three subs.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Marlon K. Schafer
 o...@odessaoffice.comwrote:

  
 15 per ap?  Man I WISH I could do that out here!

 I barely break even on a site at 15 subs.  (I really hate the sites with
 3
 to 5 subs on them :-(  ).

 I think my highest site is up to 76 subs or so.  Got a couple of them
 like
 that.  They are certainly feeling the strain but we're out of channels in
 2.4.

 For the busier sites I've started to install 5.8 gig systems over the top
 of
 the 2.4 and charge a little more for it.  So far people would still
 rather
 go with the cheaper stuff even though it's much less consistent in it's
 performance.

 For one site I have finally broken down and just install the 5.8 and sell
 it
 at the same price as the 2.4 just so that I can get people moved.

 Now if I could just get more/cheaper backhaul out here.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP


 Several little repeater sites I have are Mikrotik APs and Ubiquiti CPEs.
   No
 more then 15 stations on each AP off the top of my head.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne 

Re: [WISPA] New WISP

2010-05-06 Thread Kurt Fankhauser
I have verified with a spectrum analyzer you can run two cards stacked on
top in a 433 in the same 5.8 band as long as the channels you are using are
at complete opposite ends of the band. 5745 and 5825 and 20mhz channels and
they will not bleed over. 

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP

Usually 5.8 to the tower, and 5.2 for the repeater.  I haven't done any 
repeaters like this since DFS.  I do have a couple at 2.4.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 5/6/2010 4:22 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 Are you saying you have two radios in the 433?  Are they the same band?

 The 411 and 433 share the same horsepower, in case anyone didn't recognize
that.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
 continue that counts.
 --- Winston Churchill



 On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Mike Hammettwispawirel...@ics-il.net
wrote:

 Most of my repeater sites are about $150 - $200 more than the CPE.  I
 upgrade to a 433 from a 411, add another radio, bulkhead pigtail,
 jumper, cheap omni or sector.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 On 4/27/2010 10:19 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
  
 All of my repeater sites have 0 infrastructure cost.  I'm using a TV
tower,
 grain leg, etc.  This means the only additional cost is a NEMA box,
cheap
 battery, mt box and omni.  Roughly $400.  If I get one customer at 35/mo
it
 takes a year for ROI.  Two customers six months, etc.  I typically
charge
 45/mo and get 3 people a day after the AP is up.  Looking at my third
screen
 I've three repeater sites (at least) with only three subs.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue
 that counts.
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Marlon K.
Schafero...@odessaoffice.comwrote:



 15 per ap?  Man I WISH I could do that out here!

 I barely break even on a site at 15 subs.  (I really hate the sites
with 3
 to 5 subs on them :-(  ).

 I think my highest site is up to 76 subs or so.  Got a couple of them
like
 that.  They are certainly feeling the strain but we're out of channels
in
 2.4.

 For the busier sites I've started to install 5.8 gig systems over the
top
 of
 the 2.4 and charge a little more for it.  So far people would still
rather
 go with the cheaper stuff even though it's much less consistent in it's
 performance.

 For one site I have finally broken down and just install the 5.8 and
sell
 it
 at the same price as the 2.4 just so that I can get people moved.

 Now if I could just get more/cheaper backhaul out here.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP


 Several little repeater sites I have are Mikrotik APs and Ubiquiti
CPEs.
No
 more then 15 stations on each AP off the top of my head.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue
 that counts.
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Chuck Hoggch...@shelbybb.com
wrote:


  
 Hi Liam:

 We are a WISPA Vendor and the largest WISP in KY (just an hour or so
 away from you).

 I'm not exactly sure what you are after, but I am guessing it is the
 billing software?  We have decided to use Platypus from Tucows after
 many issues with our homegrown alternative.  We are in the
 implementation phase, so we'll let you know how that goes.

 We have extensive knowledge and have used Trango, Ubiquiti, MikroTik,
 Tranzeo, and Motorola Canopy.  Hands down, Motorola Canopy handles the
 most clients with the best throughput.  Ubiquiti and MikroTik are a
 somewhat cheaper alternative, but work well in low-sub count
situations.

 Feel free to give DJ a call, 800-405-9865 and he can guide you in the
 right direction.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On
 Behalf Of Liam Cummings
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:50 PM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] New WISP

 Hi all,

 We are a technologies solutions company located in Cincinnati and
trying
 to become a WISP. We are running into two road blocks.

 1 - We need to choose software that doesn't need a coder to operate

 2 - Choosing the 

[WISPA] Netequilizer

2010-05-06 Thread Jeremie Chism
Anybody using this product? We have a pretty good set of qos in our  
wimax platform but was considering a netequilizer to help with a few  
HD video streamers we have.

Sent from my iPhone



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout

2010-05-06 Thread Scott Lambert
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:24:46PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
 I'll show you a Rocket M5 that has more capacity than entire DSLAMs 
 around here.  As wireless gear gets faster and faster while telco 
 provided service remains the same, the place for DSL is becoming less.  
 I won't disagree with your tool comment, but a hammer makes a better 
 striking device than a screwdriver.

Can you show me a Rocket M5 that reaches customers across half the
state?  We use wireless where DSL either doesn't exist or sucks.  The
margins are thin, but the costs aren't too terribly extreme if you have
a couple thousand DSL customers, at least with our ATT and Windstream
telcos.  It helps to keep your old dial-up customers on your service
until you can get the wireless network built to them.

2000 customers, one piece of gear, fire and forget for the most part.

It is becoming less and less attractive as the telcos get more
aggressive post-deregulation, but there is still a significant segment
of our customer base we can't reach without it.

 
 On 5/6/2010 3:00 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
  Because dsl has more bandwidth available to it? It can let you bring
  extra capacity into relay sites, offload constant transfers, etc.
  Otherwise,I agree. The cost is crazy high (more then buying the same
  loop + net from the telco). Its a tool, use it where right.
 
  On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Mike Hammettwispawirel...@ics-il.net  
  wrote:
 
  I'm not sure why WISPs resell DSL is any significant capacity.
 
  -
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com
 
 
  On 4/26/2010 11:31 AM, Ryan Ghering wrote:
   
  CenturyLink has the worst billing system in the country. We resell DSL
  through them, let me tell you its a nightmare.
  Takes a few months to get new customers on the billing worksheet, and even
  longer to get them off, its a daily fight to get credits for over billing,
  AND our per customer bill rate was supposed to be changed over 18 months
  ago, and they JUST changed it 2 months ago. Cost us 30k on over billing 
  that
  they refuse to credit back now. I could go on and on but its just not 
  what I
  want to rant on today :)..
 
  The boss and I had a great conversation on Friday.. all about moving every
  DSL customer we have over to our wireless network.
  Now is the time for any qwest or CTEL reseller to get off their networks.
 
  Happy Monday!!
 
  Ryan
 
  On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Josh Luthman
  j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:
 
 
 
  If anyone has multiple PSTN lines at multiple addresses read this!
 
  I had a customer with two PSTN lines at two addresses - one was a gas
  station, the other an office.  After the merger/buyout/whatever they 
  split
  the bills and left the office one on autopay but the other line was left
  there to rack up a bill.  They never send paper bills on their own - you
  have to fight to the bone to get one.  Took a few hours but they did 
  manage
  to combine the two lines in to one account again.
 
  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373
 
  ?Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to 
  continue
  that counts.?
  --- Winston Churchill
 
 
  On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Marlon K. Schafero...@odessaoffice.com
 
   
  wrote:
 
 
   
  yeah.
 
  I spent 40 minutes on the phone just trying to get to a support person
 
 
  that
 
   
  could help with a business grade dsl line the other day.
 
  The first company that I called (the support line that showed on the
  internet) said that they (CenturyLink) didn't have any record of the
  account.  They sent me to CenturyTel (who answered the phone as
  CenturyLink).
 
  Gonna be great for MY business if they keep doing things the way that
 
 
  they
 
   
  are!
  marlon
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Ryan Gheringrgher...@gmail.com
  To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
  Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:00 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout
 
 
  I live and work in CenturyHell land.. I can tell you this, as of today
  we are now looking for alternative options of all our ds3's.
  Including those that cross connect into qwest. If they kill support at
  qwest for high-cap services like they did their own, its gona be hell
  on all of us that have qwest connections.
 
  Ryan
 
  On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeremie Chismjchi...@gmail.com
 
 
  wrote:
 
   
  It has been heading that way for a while. When they sold the wiress to
  alltel there were a lot of cuts which didn't go over well. Then the
  embarq merger has some wondering what their job responsibilities are
  and if they will have a job. I was at the corporate office a few weeks
  ago and the mood was very negative.
 
  I have been getting quite a few of their phone customers that are
  unhappy. Not to mention 

Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer

2010-05-06 Thread Chuck Profito
Butch Evans will be much, MUCH cheaper.

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:51 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Netequilizer

Anybody using this product? We have a pretty good set of qos in our  
wimax platform but was considering a netequilizer to help with a few  
HD video streamers we have.

Sent from my iPhone




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer

2010-05-06 Thread Glenn Kelley
I have not been that pleased with the NetEQ 

you can do much more with other products ... 

vyatta, or microtek I believe as well - 

Check out Butch Evans stuff - he might be able to help 

On May 6, 2010, at 7:50 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:

 Anybody using this product? We have a pretty good set of qos in our  
 wimax platform but was considering a netequilizer to help with a few  
 HD video streamers we have.
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

_
Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com 
  Email: gl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer

2010-05-06 Thread Josh Luthman
I have heard that Butch's template is just as good if not better an
alternative (currently MT, soon to be *nix/ImageStream).  I've used
MT/IS and not touch NetEq.  I doubt I ever will.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:
 I have not been that pleased with the NetEQ

 you can do much more with other products ...

 vyatta, or microtek I believe as well -

 Check out Butch Evans stuff - he might be able to help

 On May 6, 2010, at 7:50 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:

 Anybody using this product? We have a pretty good set of qos in our
 wimax platform but was considering a netequilizer to help with a few
 HD video streamers we have.

 Sent from my iPhone


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 _
 Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com
  Email: gl...@hostmedic.com
 Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer

2010-05-06 Thread Jerry Richardson
Pretty expensive version of Linux iptables.

MT is a pretty solid low cost solution with lotsa support.

A Pentium 4 with 2GB RAM will handle a butt load of traffic.

Jerry




-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Jeremie Chism
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:51 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Netequilizer

Anybody using this product? We have a pretty good set of qos in our  
wimax platform but was considering a netequilizer to help with a few  
HD video streamers we have.

Sent from my iPhone



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] POE powered Switch?

2010-05-06 Thread RickG
What about this -- http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=551 ?

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
 Anyone?



 Gino A. Villarini

 g...@aeronetpr.com

 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

 787.273.4143





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer

2010-05-06 Thread Jeremie Chism
Cisco router handles all of my routing so I was looking for something  
to go between.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 6, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Jerry Richardson  
jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:

 Pretty expensive version of Linux iptables.

 MT is a pretty solid low cost solution with lotsa support.

 A Pentium 4 with 2GB RAM will handle a butt load of traffic.

 Jerry




 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]  
 On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
 Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:51 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Netequilizer

 Anybody using this product? We have a pretty good set of qos in our
 wimax platform but was considering a netequilizer to help with a few
 HD video streamers we have.

 Sent from my iPhone


 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer

2010-05-06 Thread Josh Luthman
Why can't MT do that?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 Cisco router handles all of my routing so I was looking for something
 to go between.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 6, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Jerry Richardson
 jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:

 Pretty expensive version of Linux iptables.

 MT is a pretty solid low cost solution with lotsa support.

 A Pentium 4 with 2GB RAM will handle a butt load of traffic.

 Jerry




 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
 Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:51 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Netequilizer

 Anybody using this product? We have a pretty good set of qos in our
 wimax platform but was considering a netequilizer to help with a few
 HD video streamers we have.

 Sent from my iPhone


 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer

2010-05-06 Thread Jeremie Chism
Two 750g's is the extent of my MT knowledge so maybe it can.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 6, 2010, at 7:53 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com  
wrote:

 Why can't MT do that?

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
 continue that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill



 On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com  
 wrote:
 Cisco router handles all of my routing so I was looking for something
 to go between.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 6, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Jerry Richardson
 jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:

 Pretty expensive version of Linux iptables.

 MT is a pretty solid low cost solution with lotsa support.

 A Pentium 4 with 2GB RAM will handle a butt load of traffic.

 Jerry




 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
 Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:51 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Netequilizer

 Anybody using this product? We have a pretty good set of qos in our
 wimax platform but was considering a netequilizer to help with a few
 HD video streamers we have.

 Sent from my iPhone


 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer

2010-05-06 Thread Jeremie Chism
And I'm sure it can probably prioritize voip traffic.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 6, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Mike m...@aweiowa.com wrote:

 For some networks, NetEq is a good solution.  I've had one on my  
 network for
 a few years.  It was before Butch came up with his solution.  It was  
 a real
 lifesaver for us; it kept any users from monopolizing the pipe at  
 the peril
 of others.  One major caveat, unless they've changed it, it only plays
 traffic cop for one subnet. It will look for long duration, multiple  
 thread,
 connections and put 50 ms delays in the packets if the network gets  
 busy and
 leave headroom for the bursty users.  Another good thing it can do  
 is limit
 the number of concurrent connections any one IP can have open.  This
 effectively throttles torrents in an agnostic way.

 Friendly Regards,

 Mike


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]  
 On
 Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
 Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 7:47 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer

 Cisco router handles all of my routing so I was looking for something
 to go between.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 6, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Jerry Richardson
 jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:

 Pretty expensive version of Linux iptables.

 MT is a pretty solid low cost solution with lotsa support.

 A Pentium 4 with 2GB RAM will handle a butt load of traffic.

 Jerry




 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
 Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:51 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Netequilizer

 Anybody using this product? We have a pretty good set of qos in our
 wimax platform but was considering a netequilizer to help with a few
 HD video streamers we have.

 Sent from my iPhone


 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 --- 
 --- 
 --
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] WAS: Netequilizer NOW Bandwidth Shaping

2010-05-06 Thread Glenn Kelley
Bandwidth Shaping can be as hard or as easy as you want to make it -  
(ok maybe not that ... )
If you are friendly with Linux and IPTables - there are Free solutions

Linux Advanced Routing  Traffic Control HOWTO - http://lartc.org/lartc.html

Traffic Control using tcng and HTB HOWTO - 
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/other-formats/html_single/Traffic-Control-tcng-HTB-HOWTO.htm

There are some other alternatives - but that may help you quite a bit.











On May 6, 2010, at 8:59 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:

 Two 750g's is the extent of my MT knowledge so maybe it can.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 6, 2010, at 7:53 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 wrote:

 Why can't MT do that?

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
 continue that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill



 On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Cisco router handles all of my routing so I was looking for  
 something
 to go between.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 6, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Jerry Richardson
 jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:

 Pretty expensive version of Linux iptables.

 MT is a pretty solid low cost solution with lotsa support.

 A Pentium 4 with 2GB RAM will handle a butt load of traffic.

 Jerry




 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- 
 boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
 Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:51 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Netequilizer

 Anybody using this product? We have a pretty good set of qos in our
 wimax platform but was considering a netequilizer to help with a  
 few
 HD video streamers we have.

 Sent from my iPhone


 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer

2010-05-06 Thread tim wolfe
I've had a NetEq box running for over 3 years. It is a plug and play setup 
and does a great job if you like the hands off sorta thing. The bad side is 
the licensing and the upgrading policy. IT STINKS!. If you buy a unit that 
is only 3 months old off of Ebay, you can forget support. There was a thread 
awhile back on the DSL Reports wireless forum. I remember reading it and not 
liking the policies. You also have to purchase upgrades and some other 
little quirks that just didn't make me smile.
- Original Message - 
From: Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer


 And I'm sure it can probably prioritize voip traffic.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 6, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Mike m...@aweiowa.com wrote:

 For some networks, NetEq is a good solution.  I've had one on my
 network for
 a few years.  It was before Butch came up with his solution.  It was
 a real
 lifesaver for us; it kept any users from monopolizing the pipe at
 the peril
 of others.  One major caveat, unless they've changed it, it only plays
 traffic cop for one subnet. It will look for long duration, multiple
 thread,
 connections and put 50 ms delays in the packets if the network gets
 busy and
 leave headroom for the bursty users.  Another good thing it can do
 is limit
 the number of concurrent connections any one IP can have open.  This
 effectively throttles torrents in an agnostic way.

 Friendly Regards,

 Mike


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
 Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 7:47 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer

 Cisco router handles all of my routing so I was looking for something
 to go between.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 6, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Jerry Richardson
 jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:

 Pretty expensive version of Linux iptables.

 MT is a pretty solid low cost solution with lotsa support.

 A Pentium 4 with 2GB RAM will handle a butt load of traffic.

 Jerry




 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
 Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:51 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Netequilizer

 Anybody using this product? We have a pretty good set of qos in our
 wimax platform but was considering a netequilizer to help with a few
 HD video streamers we have.

 Sent from my iPhone


 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 --- 
 --- 
 --
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] New WISP

2010-05-06 Thread Robert West
What omini are you using, Josh?  Running 2.4 on the Tik boxes with the XR2?

Just interested in the setup on your end.  Sounds like a winner.

Bo-


- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP


Most of my repeater sites are about $150 - $200 more than the CPE.  I
upgrade to a 433 from a 411, add another radio, bulkhead pigtail,
jumper, cheap omni or sector.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 4/27/2010 10:19 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 All of my repeater sites have 0 infrastructure cost.  I'm using a TV 
 tower,
 grain leg, etc.  This means the only additional cost is a NEMA box, cheap
 battery, mt box and omni.  Roughly $400.  If I get one customer at 35/mo 
 it
 takes a year for ROI.  Two customers six months, etc.  I typically charge
 45/mo and get 3 people a day after the AP is up.  Looking at my third 
 screen
 I've three repeater sites (at least) with only three subs.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Marlon K. 
 Schafero...@odessaoffice.comwrote:


 15 per ap?  Man I WISH I could do that out here!

 I barely break even on a site at 15 subs.  (I really hate the sites with 
 3
 to 5 subs on them :-(  ).

 I think my highest site is up to 76 subs or so.  Got a couple of them 
 like
 that.  They are certainly feeling the strain but we're out of channels in
 2.4.

 For the busier sites I've started to install 5.8 gig systems over the top
 of
 the 2.4 and charge a little more for it.  So far people would still 
 rather
 go with the cheaper stuff even though it's much less consistent in it's
 performance.

 For one site I have finally broken down and just install the 5.8 and sell
 it
 at the same price as the 2.4 just so that I can get people moved.

 Now if I could just get more/cheaper backhaul out here.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP


 Several little repeater sites I have are Mikrotik APs and Ubiquiti CPEs.
   No
 more then 15 stations on each AP off the top of my head.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to 
 continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Chuck Hoggch...@shelbybb.com  wrote:


 Hi Liam:

 We are a WISPA Vendor and the largest WISP in KY (just an hour or so
 away from you).

 I'm not exactly sure what you are after, but I am guessing it is the
 billing software?  We have decided to use Platypus from Tucows after
 many issues with our homegrown alternative.  We are in the
 implementation phase, so we'll let you know how that goes.

 We have extensive knowledge and have used Trango, Ubiquiti, MikroTik,
 Tranzeo, and Motorola Canopy.  Hands down, Motorola Canopy handles the
 most clients with the best throughput.  Ubiquiti and MikroTik are a
 somewhat cheaper alternative, but work well in low-sub count situations.

 Feel free to give DJ a call, 800-405-9865 and he can guide you in the
 right direction.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Liam Cummings
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:50 PM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] New WISP

 Hi all,

 We are a technologies solutions company located in Cincinnati and trying
 to become a WISP. We are running into two road blocks.

 1 - We need to choose software that doesn't need a coder to operate

 2 - Choosing the right access points and other equipment



 We would love to here your thoughts.



 Any input would be much appreciated! :-)





 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/



 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 

Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices. Nothealthcare, taxes or government related.........

2010-05-06 Thread Robert West
I've been looking at them and reading and it's all good.  Looks like the 
ca$h is well worth it.  Hurts, but still seems to be money well spent.

UBNT tells me august for 900MHz sectors and rockets..

Bob-


- Original Message - 
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices. 
Nothealthcare, taxes or government related.


 MTI is damn good quality.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 On 4/29/2010 8:17 PM, Robert West wrote:
 I hear ya.  I will gladly pay extra now to not have to go back over and
 over.  Pays 10X in the long run.

 I prefer goo quality. :)

 I'll give it a look to be sure.

 Bob-


 - Original Message -
 From: Jeremie Chismjchi...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:11 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices.
 Nothealthcare, taxes or government related.



 Tiltek dual polarity 900 MHz.  I have had 8 up for 2.5 years with no
 problem. Not the cheapest but definitely goo quality. I like to use
 equipment that I don't have to go back to.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Robert Westrobert.w...@just-
 micro.com  wrote:


 I'm in need of a 120 or a couple of 90 degree 900MHz H-POL sector
 antenna(s).  Not looking forward to buying worthless CRAP just
 because I've never had to buy these before so I'm asking who uses
 what and if it works great.  I've done the Omni path, okay but
 noisy, but this new install needs some decent signal for 2 to 4
 miles.  Mostly clear path but, ofcourse , into the trees to the CPEs.

 I've looked at the Super Pass solution and as we all know, I'm a
 cheap SOB so it fits my budget but I'd gladly pay bigger $$$ for top
 quality if it's deserved.

 Thanks.

 Bob-

 The cheap SOB





 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer

2010-05-06 Thread Robert West
MT washes my clothes and folds my pants.

It can do EVERYTHING!

Bob-


- Original Message - 
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Netequilizer


Why can't MT do that?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 Cisco router handles all of my routing so I was looking for something
 to go between.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 6, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Jerry Richardson
 jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:

 Pretty expensive version of Linux iptables.

 MT is a pretty solid low cost solution with lotsa support.

 A Pentium 4 with 2GB RAM will handle a butt load of traffic.

 Jerry




 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
 Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:51 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Netequilizer

 Anybody using this product? We have a pretty good set of qos in our
 wimax platform but was considering a netequilizer to help with a few
 HD video streamers we have.

 Sent from my iPhone


 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] New WISP

2010-05-06 Thread Josh Luthman
I've not run any XR2, actually.  Probably should.  I think the next
one we do one in a few weeks I will try it out.  I've used the wlm54ag
a bunch.

Pac antennas.  I've not had any more or less success with others.
Comet with 3* downtilt seemed a bit less then Pac's big one (12dbi?)
but the customers haven't ever had issues.  Was an experiment.

On 5/6/10, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
 What omini are you using, Josh?  Running 2.4 on the Tik boxes with the XR2?

 Just interested in the setup on your end.  Sounds like a winner.

 Bo-


 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 5:21 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP


 Most of my repeater sites are about $150 - $200 more than the CPE.  I
 upgrade to a 433 from a 411, add another radio, bulkhead pigtail,
 jumper, cheap omni or sector.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 On 4/27/2010 10:19 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 All of my repeater sites have 0 infrastructure cost.  I'm using a TV
 tower,
 grain leg, etc.  This means the only additional cost is a NEMA box, cheap
 battery, mt box and omni.  Roughly $400.  If I get one customer at 35/mo
 it
 takes a year for ROI.  Two customers six months, etc.  I typically charge
 45/mo and get 3 people a day after the AP is up.  Looking at my third
 screen
 I've three repeater sites (at least) with only three subs.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Marlon K.
 Schafero...@odessaoffice.comwrote:


 15 per ap?  Man I WISH I could do that out here!

 I barely break even on a site at 15 subs.  (I really hate the sites with
 3
 to 5 subs on them :-(  ).

 I think my highest site is up to 76 subs or so.  Got a couple of them
 like
 that.  They are certainly feeling the strain but we're out of channels in
 2.4.

 For the busier sites I've started to install 5.8 gig systems over the top
 of
 the 2.4 and charge a little more for it.  So far people would still
 rather
 go with the cheaper stuff even though it's much less consistent in it's
 performance.

 For one site I have finally broken down and just install the 5.8 and sell
 it
 at the same price as the 2.4 just so that I can get people moved.

 Now if I could just get more/cheaper backhaul out here.
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP


 Several little repeater sites I have are Mikrotik APs and Ubiquiti CPEs.
   No
 more then 15 stations on each AP off the top of my head.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
 continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Chuck Hoggch...@shelbybb.com  wrote:


 Hi Liam:

 We are a WISPA Vendor and the largest WISP in KY (just an hour or so
 away from you).

 I'm not exactly sure what you are after, but I am guessing it is the
 billing software?  We have decided to use Platypus from Tucows after
 many issues with our homegrown alternative.  We are in the
 implementation phase, so we'll let you know how that goes.

 We have extensive knowledge and have used Trango, Ubiquiti, MikroTik,
 Tranzeo, and Motorola Canopy.  Hands down, Motorola Canopy handles the
 most clients with the best throughput.  Ubiquiti and MikroTik are a
 somewhat cheaper alternative, but work well in low-sub count situations.

 Feel free to give DJ a call, 800-405-9865 and he can guide you in the
 right direction.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Liam Cummings
 Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:50 PM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] New WISP

 Hi all,

 We are a technologies solutions company located in Cincinnati and trying
 to become a WISP. We are running into two road blocks.

 1 - We need to choose software that doesn't need a coder to operate

 2 - Choosing the right access points and other equipment



 We would love to here your thoughts.



 Any input would be much appreciated! :-)





 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 

Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices. Not healthcare, taxes or government related.........

2010-05-06 Thread Josh Luthman
900.OFDMI can't sleep I'm so excited!

On 5/6/10, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
 I've been looking at them and reading and it's all good.  Looks like the
 ca$h is well worth it.  Hurts, but still seems to be money well spent.

 UBNT tells me august for 900MHz sectors and rockets..

 Bob-


 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:33 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices.
 Nothealthcare, taxes or government related.


 MTI is damn good quality.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 On 4/29/2010 8:17 PM, Robert West wrote:
 I hear ya.  I will gladly pay extra now to not have to go back over and
 over.  Pays 10X in the long run.

 I prefer goo quality. :)

 I'll give it a look to be sure.

 Bob-


 - Original Message -
 From: Jeremie Chismjchi...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:11 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices.
 Nothealthcare, taxes or government related.



 Tiltek dual polarity 900 MHz.  I have had 8 up for 2.5 years with no
 problem. Not the cheapest but definitely goo quality. I like to use
 equipment that I don't have to go back to.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Robert Westrobert.w...@just-
 micro.com  wrote:


 I'm in need of a 120 or a couple of 90 degree 900MHz H-POL sector
 antenna(s).  Not looking forward to buying worthless CRAP just
 because I've never had to buy these before so I'm asking who uses
 what and if it works great.  I've done the Omni path, okay but
 noisy, but this new install needs some decent signal for 2 to 4
 miles.  Mostly clear path but, ofcourse , into the trees to the CPEs.

 I've looked at the Super Pass solution and as we all know, I'm a
 cheap SOB so it fits my budget but I'd gladly pay bigger $$$ for top
 quality if it's deserved.

 Thanks.

 Bob-

 The cheap SOB





 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ...hope this doesn't offendanyone...seems to be pretty straightforward reporting withminimal opinion

2010-05-06 Thread MDK
Opinion:   It won't be good.

Also, the financial reform currently contains a provision that requires 
ANY contract that can be construed as credit extended to your customer be 
approved by an as yet not created federal agency.



++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200  509-386-4589
++

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices. Nothealthcare, taxes or government related.........

2010-05-06 Thread Robert West
Oh, hell yes, my brother!


- Original Message - 
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices. 
Nothealthcare, taxes or government related.


900.OFDMI can't sleep I'm so excited!

On 5/6/10, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
 I've been looking at them and reading and it's all good.  Looks like the
 ca$h is well worth it.  Hurts, but still seems to be money well spent.

 UBNT tells me august for 900MHz sectors and rockets..

 Bob-


 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:33 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices.
 Nothealthcare, taxes or government related.


 MTI is damn good quality.


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 On 4/29/2010 8:17 PM, Robert West wrote:
 I hear ya.  I will gladly pay extra now to not have to go back over and
 over.  Pays 10X in the long run.

 I prefer goo quality. :)

 I'll give it a look to be sure.

 Bob-


 - Original Message -
 From: Jeremie Chismjchi...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:11 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices.
 Nothealthcare, taxes or government related.



 Tiltek dual polarity 900 MHz.  I have had 8 up for 2.5 years with no
 problem. Not the cheapest but definitely goo quality. I like to use
 equipment that I don't have to go back to.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Robert Westrobert.w...@just-
 micro.com  wrote:


 I'm in need of a 120 or a couple of 90 degree 900MHz H-POL sector
 antenna(s).  Not looking forward to buying worthless CRAP just
 because I've never had to buy these before so I'm asking who uses
 what and if it works great.  I've done the Omni path, okay but
 noisy, but this new install needs some decent signal for 2 to 4
 miles.  Mostly clear path but, ofcourse , into the trees to the CPEs.

 I've looked at the Super Pass solution and as we all know, I'm a
 cheap SOB so it fits my budget but I'd gladly pay bigger $$$ for top
 quality if it's deserved.

 Thanks.

 Bob-

 The cheap SOB





 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: 

Re: [WISPA] New WISP

2010-05-06 Thread Blair Davis




The 433 is more than adequate for 2 cards for a low usage repeater...

Josh Luthman wrote:

  Are you saying you have two radios in the 433?  Are they the same band?

The 411 and 433 share the same horsepower, in case anyone didn't recognize that.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
  
  
Most of my repeater sites are about $150 - $200 more than the CPE.  I
upgrade to a 433 from a 411, add another radio, bulkhead pigtail,
jumper, cheap omni or sector.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 4/27/2010 10:19 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:


  All of my repeater sites have 0 infrastructure cost.  I'm using a TV tower,
grain leg, etc.  This means the only additional cost is a NEMA box, cheap
battery, mt box and omni.  Roughly $400.  If I get one customer at 35/mo it
takes a year for ROI.  Two customers six months, etc.  I typically charge
45/mo and get 3 people a day after the AP is up.  Looking at my third screen
I've three repeater sites (at least) with only three subs.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill


On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Marlon K. Schafero...@odessaoffice.comwrote:


  
  
15 per ap?  Man I WISH I could do that out here!

I barely break even on a site at 15 subs.  (I really hate the sites with 3
to 5 subs on them :-(  ).

I think my highest site is up to 76 subs or so.  Got a couple of them like
that.  They are certainly feeling the strain but we're out of channels in
2.4.

For the busier sites I've started to install 5.8 gig systems over the top
of
the 2.4 and charge a little more for it.  So far people would still rather
go with the cheaper stuff even though it's much less consistent in it's
performance.

For one site I have finally broken down and just install the 5.8 and sell
it
at the same price as the 2.4 just so that I can get people moved.

Now if I could just get more/cheaper backhaul out here.
marlon

- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: "WISPA General List"wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP


Several little repeater sites I have are Mikrotik APs and Ubiquiti CPEs.
  No
more then 15 stations on each AP off the top of my head.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill


On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Chuck Hoggch...@shelbybb.com  wrote:




  Hi Liam:

We are a WISPA Vendor and the largest WISP in KY (just an hour or so
away from you).

I'm not exactly sure what you are after, but I am guessing it is the
billing software?  We have decided to use Platypus from Tucows after
many issues with our homegrown alternative.  We are in the
implementation phase, so we'll let you know how that goes.

We have extensive knowledge and have used Trango, Ubiquiti, MikroTik,
Tranzeo, and Motorola Canopy.  Hands down, Motorola Canopy handles the
most clients with the best throughput.  Ubiquiti and MikroTik are a
somewhat cheaper alternative, but work well in low-sub count situations.

Feel free to give DJ a call, 800-405-9865 and he can guide you in the
right direction.

Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Liam Cummings
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:50 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] New WISP

Hi all,

We are a technologies solutions company located in Cincinnati and trying
to become a WISP. We are running into two road blocks.

1 - We need to choose software that doesn't need a coder to operate

2 - Choosing the right access points and other equipment



We would love to here your thoughts.



Any input would be much appreciated! :-)







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





  





  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/



  


Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout

2010-05-06 Thread Mike Hammett
Depends on the state.  :-p


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 5/6/2010 6:52 PM, Scott Lambert wrote:
 On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:24:46PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:

 I'll show you a Rocket M5 that has more capacity than entire DSLAMs
 around here.  As wireless gear gets faster and faster while telco
 provided service remains the same, the place for DSL is becoming less.
 I won't disagree with your tool comment, but a hammer makes a better
 striking device than a screwdriver.
  
 Can you show me a Rocket M5 that reaches customers across half the
 state?  We use wireless where DSL either doesn't exist or sucks.  The
 margins are thin, but the costs aren't too terribly extreme if you have
 a couple thousand DSL customers, at least with our ATT and Windstream
 telcos.  It helps to keep your old dial-up customers on your service
 until you can get the wireless network built to them.

 2000 customers, one piece of gear, fire and forget for the most part.

 It is becoming less and less attractive as the telcos get more
 aggressive post-deregulation, but there is still a significant segment
 of our customer base we can't reach without it.



 On 5/6/2010 3:00 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
  
 Because dsl has more bandwidth available to it? It can let you bring
 extra capacity into relay sites, offload constant transfers, etc.
 Otherwise,I agree. The cost is crazy high (more then buying the same
 loop + net from the telco). Its a tool, use it where right.

 On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Mike Hammettwispawirel...@ics-il.net   
 wrote:


 I'm not sure why WISPs resell DSL is any significant capacity.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 On 4/26/2010 11:31 AM, Ryan Ghering wrote:

  
 CenturyLink has the worst billing system in the country. We resell DSL
 through them, let me tell you its a nightmare.
 Takes a few months to get new customers on the billing worksheet, and even
 longer to get them off, its a daily fight to get credits for over billing,
 AND our per customer bill rate was supposed to be changed over 18 months
 ago, and they JUST changed it 2 months ago. Cost us 30k on over billing 
 that
 they refuse to credit back now. I could go on and on but its just not 
 what I
 want to rant on today :)..

 The boss and I had a great conversation on Friday.. all about moving every
 DSL customer we have over to our wireless network.
 Now is the time for any qwest or CTEL reseller to get off their networks.

 Happy Monday!!

 Ryan

 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Josh Luthman
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:




 If anyone has multiple PSTN lines at multiple addresses read this!

 I had a customer with two PSTN lines at two addresses - one was a gas
 station, the other an office.  After the merger/buyout/whatever they 
 split
 the bills and left the office one on autopay but the other line was left
 there to rack up a bill.  They never send paper bills on their own - you
 have to fight to the bone to get one.  Took a few hours but they did 
 manage
 to combine the two lines in to one account again.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 ?Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to 
 continue
 that counts.?
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Marlon K. Schafero...@odessaoffice.com


  
 wrote:




  
 yeah.

 I spent 40 minutes on the phone just trying to get to a support person



 that


  
 could help with a business grade dsl line the other day.

 The first company that I called (the support line that showed on the
 internet) said that they (CenturyLink) didn't have any record of the
 account.  They sent me to CenturyTel (who answered the phone as
 CenturyLink).

 Gonna be great for MY business if they keep doing things the way that



 they


  
 are!
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Ryan Gheringrgher...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout


 I live and work in CenturyHell land.. I can tell you this, as of today
 we are now looking for alternative options of all our ds3's.
 Including those that cross connect into qwest. If they kill support at
 qwest for high-cap services like they did their own, its gona be hell
 on all of us that have qwest connections.

 Ryan

 On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeremie Chismjchi...@gmail.com



 wrote:


  
 It has been heading that way for a while. When they sold the wiress to
 alltel there were a lot of cuts which didn't go over well. Then the
 embarq merger has some wondering what their job responsibilities are
 and if they will have a job. I was at the corporate office a few weeks
 ago and the mood was 

Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout

2010-05-06 Thread Glenn Kelley
funny - i was just thinking the same thing...

On May 7, 2010, at 12:23 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Depends on the state.  :-p


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 On 5/6/2010 6:52 PM, Scott Lambert wrote:
 On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:24:46PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:

 I'll show you a Rocket M5 that has more capacity than entire DSLAMs
 around here.  As wireless gear gets faster and faster while telco
 provided service remains the same, the place for DSL is becoming  
 less.
 I won't disagree with your tool comment, but a hammer makes a better
 striking device than a screwdriver.

 Can you show me a Rocket M5 that reaches customers across half the
 state?  We use wireless where DSL either doesn't exist or sucks.  The
 margins are thin, but the costs aren't too terribly extreme if you  
 have
 a couple thousand DSL customers, at least with our ATT and  
 Windstream
 telcos.  It helps to keep your old dial-up customers on your service
 until you can get the wireless network built to them.

 2000 customers, one piece of gear, fire and forget for the most part.

 It is becoming less and less attractive as the telcos get more
 aggressive post-deregulation, but there is still a significant  
 segment
 of our customer base we can't reach without it.



 On 5/6/2010 3:00 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:

 Because dsl has more bandwidth available to it? It can let you  
 bring
 extra capacity into relay sites, offload constant transfers, etc.
 Otherwise,I agree. The cost is crazy high (more then buying the  
 same
 loop + net from the telco). Its a tool, use it where right.

 On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Mike Hammettwispawirel...@ics-il.net 
wrote:


 I'm not sure why WISPs resell DSL is any significant capacity.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 On 4/26/2010 11:31 AM, Ryan Ghering wrote:


 CenturyLink has the worst billing system in the country. We  
 resell DSL
 through them, let me tell you its a nightmare.
 Takes a few months to get new customers on the billing  
 worksheet, and even
 longer to get them off, its a daily fight to get credits for  
 over billing,
 AND our per customer bill rate was supposed to be changed over  
 18 months
 ago, and they JUST changed it 2 months ago. Cost us 30k on over  
 billing that
 they refuse to credit back now. I could go on and on but its  
 just not what I
 want to rant on today :)..

 The boss and I had a great conversation on Friday.. all about  
 moving every
 DSL customer we have over to our wireless network.
 Now is the time for any qwest or CTEL reseller to get off their  
 networks.

 Happy Monday!!

 Ryan

 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Josh Luthman
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:




 If anyone has multiple PSTN lines at multiple addresses read  
 this!

 I had a customer with two PSTN lines at two addresses - one  
 was a gas
 station, the other an office.  After the merger/buyout/ 
 whatever they split
 the bills and left the office one on autopay but the other  
 line was left
 there to rack up a bill.  They never send paper bills on their  
 own - you
 have to fight to the bone to get one.  Took a few hours but  
 they did manage
 to combine the two lines in to one account again.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 ?Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage  
 to continue
 that counts.?
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Marlon K. 
 Schafero...@odessaoffice.com



 wrote:





 yeah.

 I spent 40 minutes on the phone just trying to get to a  
 support person



 that



 could help with a business grade dsl line the other day.

 The first company that I called (the support line that showed  
 on the
 internet) said that they (CenturyLink) didn't have any record  
 of the
 account.  They sent me to CenturyTel (who answered the phone as
 CenturyLink).

 Gonna be great for MY business if they keep doing things the  
 way that



 they



 are!
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Ryan Gheringrgher...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout


 I live and work in CenturyHell land.. I can tell you this, as  
 of today
 we are now looking for alternative options of all our ds3's.
 Including those that cross connect into qwest. If they kill  
 support at
 qwest for high-cap services like they did their own, its gona  
 be hell
 on all of us that have qwest connections.

 Ryan

 On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeremie Chismjchi...@gmail.com 
 



 wrote:



 It has been heading that way for a while. When they sold the  
 wiress to
 alltel there were a lot of cuts which didn't go over well.  
 Then the
 embarq merger has some wondering what their job  
 responsibilities are
 and if they will have a job. I was at the corporate office a  
 few weeks
 ago and the 

Re: [WISPA] New WISP

2010-05-06 Thread Blair Davis




I've been doing that for a couple of years...

But I've only been leaving 1 or 2 empty channels between them
20-40 MHz open space.

Kurt Fankhauser wrote:

  I have verified with a spectrum analyzer you can run two cards stacked on
top in a 433 in the same 5.8 band as long as the channels you are using are
at complete opposite ends of the band. 5745 and 5825 and 20mhz channels and
they will not bleed over. 

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP

Usually 5.8 to the tower, and 5.2 for the repeater.  I haven't done any 
repeaters like this since DFS.  I do have a couple at 2.4.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 5/6/2010 4:22 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
  
  
Are you saying you have two radios in the 433?  Are they the same band?

The 411 and 433 share the same horsepower, in case anyone didn't recognize

  
  that.
  
  
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts."
--- Winston Churchill



On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Mike Hammettwispawirel...@ics-il.net

  
  wrote:
  
  
   


  Most of my repeater sites are about $150 - $200 more than the CPE.  I
upgrade to a 433 from a 411, add another radio, bulkhead pigtail,
jumper, cheap omni or sector.

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 4/27/2010 10:19 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
 
  
  
All of my repeater sites have 0 infrastructure cost.  I'm using a TV

  

  
  tower,
  
  

  
grain leg, etc.  This means the only additional cost is a NEMA box,

  

  
  cheap
  
  

  
battery, mt box and omni.  Roughly $400.  If I get one customer at 35/mo

  

  
  it
  
  

  
takes a year for ROI.  Two customers six months, etc.  I typically

  

  
  charge
  
  

  
45/mo and get 3 people a day after the AP is up.  Looking at my third

  

  
  screen
  
  

  
I've three repeater sites (at least) with only three subs.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to

  

  
  continue
  
  

  
that counts."
--- Winston Churchill


On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Marlon K.

  

  
  Schafero...@odessaoffice.comwrote:
  
  

  

   


  15 per ap?  Man I WISH I could do that out here!

I barely break even on a site at 15 subs.  (I really hate the sites
  

  

  
  with 3
  
  

  

  to 5 subs on them :-(  ).

I think my highest site is up to 76 subs or so.  Got a couple of them
  

  

  
  like
  
  

  

  that.  They are certainly feeling the strain but we're out of channels
  

  

  
  in
  
  

  

  2.4.

For the busier sites I've started to install 5.8 gig systems over the
  

  

  
  top
  
  

  

  of
the 2.4 and charge a little more for it.  So far people would still
  

  

  
  rather
  
  

  

  go with the cheaper stuff even though it's much less consistent in it's
performance.

For one site I have finally broken down and just install the 5.8 and
  

  

  
  sell
  
  

  

  it
at the same price as the 2.4 just so that I can get people moved.

Now if I could just get more/cheaper backhaul out here.
marlon

- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: "WISPA General List"wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New WISP


Several little repeater sites I have are Mikrotik APs and Ubiquiti
  

  

  
  CPEs.
  
  

  

 No
more then 15 stations on each AP off the top of my head.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
  

  

  
  continue
  
  

  

  that counts."
--- Winston Churchill


On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Chuck Hoggch...@shelbybb.com
  

  

  
  wrote:
  
  

  

  
 
  
  
Hi 

Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices. Not healthcare, taxes or government related.........

2010-05-06 Thread Blair Davis




Now, just make the CPE's work with my existing XR9 based AP's!!!



Josh Luthman wrote:

  900.OFDMI can't sleep I'm so excited!

On 5/6/10, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
  
  
I've been looking at them and reading and it's all good.  Looks like the
ca$h is well worth it.  Hurts, but still seems to be money well spent.

UBNT tells me august for 900MHz sectors and rockets..

Bob-


- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" wispawirel...@ics-il.net
To: "WISPA General List" wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices.
Nothealthcare, taxes or government related.




  MTI is damn good quality.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 4/29/2010 8:17 PM, Robert West wrote:
  
  
I hear ya.  I will gladly pay extra now to not have to go back over and
over.  Pays 10X in the long run.

I prefer goo quality. :)

I'll give it a look to be sure.

Bob-


- Original Message -
From: "Jeremie Chism"jchi...@gmail.com
To: "WISPA General List"wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for iput on 900MHz H-Pol Sector Choices.
Nothealthcare, taxes or government related.





  Tiltek dual polarity 900 MHz.  I have had 8 up for 2.5 years with no
problem. Not the cheapest but definitely goo quality. I like to use
equipment that I don't have to go back to.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:02 PM, "Robert West"robert.w...@just-
micro.com  wrote:


  
  
I'm in need of a 120 or a couple of 90 degree 900MHz H-POL sector
antenna(s).  Not looking forward to buying worthless CRAP just
because I've never had to buy these before so I'm asking who uses
what and if it works great.  I've done the Omni path, okay but
noisy, but this new install needs some decent signal for 2 to 4
miles.  Mostly clear path but, ofcourse , into the trees to the CPEs.

I've looked at the Super Pass solution and as we all know, I'm a
cheap SOB so it fits my budget but I'd gladly pay bigger $$$ for top
quality if it's deserved.

Thanks.

Bob-

The cheap SOB





---
---
---
---

WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
---
---
---
---


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  
  
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



  




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  
  


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  
  

  







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout

2010-05-06 Thread Robert West
Go to bed.


- Original Message - 
From: Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout


 funny - i was just thinking the same thing...

 On May 7, 2010, at 12:23 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 Depends on the state.  :-p


 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com



 On 5/6/2010 6:52 PM, Scott Lambert wrote:
 On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:24:46PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:

 I'll show you a Rocket M5 that has more capacity than entire DSLAMs
 around here.  As wireless gear gets faster and faster while telco
 provided service remains the same, the place for DSL is becoming
 less.
 I won't disagree with your tool comment, but a hammer makes a better
 striking device than a screwdriver.

 Can you show me a Rocket M5 that reaches customers across half the
 state?  We use wireless where DSL either doesn't exist or sucks.  The
 margins are thin, but the costs aren't too terribly extreme if you
 have
 a couple thousand DSL customers, at least with our ATT and
 Windstream
 telcos.  It helps to keep your old dial-up customers on your service
 until you can get the wireless network built to them.

 2000 customers, one piece of gear, fire and forget for the most part.

 It is becoming less and less attractive as the telcos get more
 aggressive post-deregulation, but there is still a significant
 segment
 of our customer base we can't reach without it.



 On 5/6/2010 3:00 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:

 Because dsl has more bandwidth available to it? It can let you
 bring
 extra capacity into relay sites, offload constant transfers, etc.
 Otherwise,I agree. The cost is crazy high (more then buying the
 same
 loop + net from the telco). Its a tool, use it where right.

 On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Mike Hammettwispawirel...@ics-il.net
wrote:


 I'm not sure why WISPs resell DSL is any significant capacity.

 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com


 On 4/26/2010 11:31 AM, Ryan Ghering wrote:


 CenturyLink has the worst billing system in the country. We
 resell DSL
 through them, let me tell you its a nightmare.
 Takes a few months to get new customers on the billing
 worksheet, and even
 longer to get them off, its a daily fight to get credits for
 over billing,
 AND our per customer bill rate was supposed to be changed over
 18 months
 ago, and they JUST changed it 2 months ago. Cost us 30k on over
 billing that
 they refuse to credit back now. I could go on and on but its
 just not what I
 want to rant on today :)..

 The boss and I had a great conversation on Friday.. all about
 moving every
 DSL customer we have over to our wireless network.
 Now is the time for any qwest or CTEL reseller to get off their
 networks.

 Happy Monday!!

 Ryan

 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Josh Luthman
 j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:




 If anyone has multiple PSTN lines at multiple addresses read
 this!

 I had a customer with two PSTN lines at two addresses - one
 was a gas
 station, the other an office.  After the merger/buyout/
 whatever they split
 the bills and left the office one on autopay but the other
 line was left
 there to rack up a bill.  They never send paper bills on their
 own - you
 have to fight to the bone to get one.  Took a few hours but
 they did manage
 to combine the two lines in to one account again.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 ?Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage
 to continue
 that counts.?
 --- Winston Churchill


 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Marlon K. 
 Schafero...@odessaoffice.com



 wrote:





 yeah.

 I spent 40 minutes on the phone just trying to get to a
 support person



 that



 could help with a business grade dsl line the other day.

 The first company that I called (the support line that showed
 on the
 internet) said that they (CenturyLink) didn't have any record
 of the
 account.  They sent me to CenturyTel (who answered the phone as
 CenturyLink).

 Gonna be great for MY business if they keep doing things the
 way that



 they



 are!
 marlon

 - Original Message -
 From: Ryan Gheringrgher...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Qwest buyout


 I live and work in CenturyHell land.. I can tell you this, as
 of today
 we are now looking for alternative options of all our ds3's.
 Including those that cross connect into qwest. If they kill
 support at
 qwest for high-cap services like they did their own, its gona
 be hell
 on all of us that have qwest connections.

 Ryan

 On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jeremie Chismjchi...@gmail.com
 



 wrote:



 It has been heading that way for a while. When they sold the
 wiress to
 alltel there were a lot of cuts which didn't go over well.
 Then the
 embarq merger has some