Re: [WISPA] American Dollar. Was: Re: Barriers to WISP growth

[Daniel Mullen]

I just cannot keep quiet on this any more.

Gold, in US Dollars, was $1045 and change this morning. That sounds  
high, but it was higher, in constant currency terms when you look at a  
basket of currencies.

Yes, oil still is priced in nice U.S. Dollars, and everyone is glad to  
have them.

So far, so good.

The folks in the Middle East buy German cars, use European adult  
personal entertainment, and go shopping - either in the sparkling new  
massive shopping mall in town, or again, somewhere in Europe - and the  
dollars get converted eventually into Euros.

I used to get 80¢ to the Euro. Now it is $1.46.

You can do the math on that.

As long as China continues to be the 'sister nation' to the United  
States of America, keeping its currency fairly closely pegged to the  
U.S. Dollar, then everything will be fine. All the Asian countries  
will do their best to work on U.S. Dollar terms so as to stay  
competitive vis-a-vis China.

But China is now sitting on TWO TRILLION - that is 2,000,000,000,000 -  
U.S. Dollars, and wondering what to do. If they wanted to take over  
the world today, instead of merely the entire Asia-Pacific region and  
Africa, they could simply cut the line and then let the U.S.A. dangle  
in the wind.

As it is, China is going around the world buying everything you can  
imagine: years worth of factory equipment from Germany, minerals in  
Africa, oil and gas everywhere, iron ore from Brazil, uranium from  
Australia, and on and on.

You should see the pictures: gigantic barges being loaded with  
enormous open spools of copper, a good ten feet in diameter, to be  
stockpiled in China, and more ore than you could possibly fathom.

And now they are buying gold: gold and more gold, and the government  
is telling its citizens to also buy gold.

Simply put, they are turning the greenbacks into hard assets.

None of this will bother you, because all your gear is made from parts  
which are priced in U.S. Dollars, and China is keeping a good lid on  
things - until they stop.

When the Sheiks - or Mr. Chavez - decides they want some pretty thing  
from Europe, and see how small their wallets are, the price of oil -  
yes, in U.S. Dollars - will go to the moon.

The fact that oil is priced in dollars really means nothing. It is the  
value that the producer gets for the specific volume sold that  
matters, and as long as the rest of the world is getting more  
expensive by comparison, the more dollars the sellers will want to  
ensure they can keep on buying those things, regardless of what the  
dollar buys for you in your own backyard.

By the way, milk is cheap everywhere now - in Belgium the farmers  
started to spray it on their fields rather than sell it, just to make  
demonstrate how low it has gone.



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Recommendations for Ubiquiti 3.65 site

[Daniel Mullen]

If this helps:

We are in Canada - spectrum license time: one week. Effort: one page letter.

There are three 900 MHz Canopy sectors and an 
omni serving at least 24 customers who are now on 2.4 GHz Canopy.


Currently the backhaul is on 5 GHz but this will 
need to change to support a ~300 Mbps link.


The site is on a hill with a 96' tower 
overlooking the coast, with all of the 30 or so 
2.4 GHz customers being inside of 1000 yards, and 
perhaps a few more up to 2000 yards away.


My plan was to put up two Titanium base stations, 
each with a 90° antenna of unknown source as of 
yet, and to put up to 24 customers on each sector 
to offer an upgrade to either 5 Mbps or 10 Mbps 
connections. These are existing customers, so it 
would be free radio rental and free installation 
in return for 24 month contracts.


I would be more than willing to deploy something 
like the PMP450 or Runcom LTE stuff, but we need 
to do this in the next couple of weeks.


Daniel


At 18:20 31.07.2013, you wrote:

Use NSM365 with a dish on all but the shortest links.

Keep distances short, 4 miles or less.

AMQ above 80%

TX CCQ above 75%

RX level or -70 or better

AMQ, TX CCQ, & RX level must ALL be at or above those values.

Keep SM counts below 45 or so.

Use KP Performance antennas or Ubiquiti antennas with RF Armor shields.

Once the above is done, start saving money for 
the upcoming 3.65 PMP450 (don't hold your breath 
though) and replace the Ubiquiti gear when it becomes available.




On Jul 31, 2013, at 9:01 AM, 
<daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca> 
<daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca> wrote:


We are putting up a 3.65 GHz system next week 
to take existing customers off of an existing Canopy 2.4GHz system.


Is there anyone who has deployed the 3 Ghz gear 
from Ubnt and could recommend which model of 
CPE and if there anything to know to avoid a 
steep 'learning curve' since we have never 
deployed anything from Ubiquiti until now.


Suggestions as to the best prices are most welcome too!

Thanks,

Daniel
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Recommendations for Ubiquiti 3.65 site

[Daniel Mullen]

It may come to that, but all of our back haul 
links are 5 GHz and it was always intended to be 
kept 'clean' for this purpose. If we could count 
on using the 3.65 GHz for backhaul it would mean 
switching the links on ~20 towers but help us get out of the 2.4 GHz mess.


Daniel

At 00:43 01.08.2013, you wrote:

Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_CE1F0B6B1B2E1gavaeronetprcom_"

Why don't you use PMP450 in 5ghz?



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr



From: Daniel Mullen <<mailto:wi...@metrocom.ca>wi...@metrocom.ca>
Reply-To: WISPA General List <<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>wireless@wispa.org>
Date: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 6:22 PM
To: WISPA General List <<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>wireless@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Recommendations for Ubiquiti 3.65 site

If this helps:

We are in Canada - spectrum license time: one week. Effort: one page letter.

There are three 900 MHz Canopy sectors and an 
omni serving at least 24 customers who are now on 2.4 GHz Canopy.


Currently the backhaul is on 5 GHz but this will 
need to change to support a ~300 Mbps link.


The site is on a hill with a 96' tower 
overlooking the coast, with all of the 30 or so 
2.4 GHz customers being inside of 1000 yards, 
and perhaps a few more up to 2000 yards away.


My plan was to put up two Titanium base 
stations, each with a 90° antenna of unknown 
source as of yet, and to put up to 24 customers 
on each sector to offer an upgrade to either 5 
Mbps or 10 Mbps connections. These are existing 
customers, so it would be free radio rental and 
free installation in return for 24 month contracts.


I would be more than willing to deploy something 
like the PMP450 or Runcom LTE stuff, but we need 
to do this in the next couple of weeks.


Daniel


At 18:20 31.07.2013, you wrote:

Use NSM365 with a dish on all but the shortest links.

Keep distances short, 4 miles or less.

AMQ above 80%

TX CCQ above 75%

RX level or -70 or better

AMQ, TX CCQ, & RX level must ALL be at or above those values.

Keep SM counts below 45 or so.

Use KP Performance antennas or Ubiquiti antennas with RF Armor shields.

Once the above is done, start saving money for 
the upcoming 3.65 PMP450 (don't hold your 
breath though) and replace the Ubiquiti gear when it becomes available.




On Jul 31, 2013, at 9:01 AM, 
<<mailto:daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca> 
daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca> 
<<mailto:daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca> daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca> wrote:


We are putting up a 3.65 GHz system next week 
to take existing customers off of an existing Canopy 2.4GHz system.


Is there anyone who has deployed the 3 Ghz 
gear from Ubnt and could recommend which model 
of CPE and if there anything to know to avoid 
a steep 'learning curve' since we have never 
deployed anything from Ubiquiti until now.


Suggestions as to the best prices are most welcome too!

Thanks,

Daniel
___
Wireless mailing list
<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio

[daniel . mullen]

Bryce,

I thought you wanted a 38 GHz unit - the 24 GHz antenna would be a -26 model, 
and you could pair it up with a Canopy radio or anything else of course.

Daniel

wi...@metrocom.ca wrote ..
> Hi Bryce,
> 
> Of course - there is an 8" antenna - 20 cm for us in Canada - that will do the
> job.
> 
> I do not know if it is an ETSI Class 4 antenna, which everyone should use if 
> they
> can, but the Andrew VHLP200-38 is small enough. Keep in mind it would not be a
> dual-polarized antenna at that size.
> 
> Daniel Mullen
> 
> 
> Bryce Duchcherer  wrote ..
> > Does anybody know of a 24GHz radio that is smaller than 1'?
> > It doesn't have to go very far, but we are wanting 24GHz.
> > 
> > Bryce D
> > NETAGO
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio

[daniel . mullen]

Sure -

http://www.commscope.com/catalog/wireless/2147485870/product_details.aspx?id=27271

I will sell it to you with a radio attached too! ;-)

Daniel


Bryce Duchcherer  wrote ..
> Do you have a link?
> 
> Bryce D
> NETAGO
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
> Of daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 16:12
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio
> 
> Bryce,
> 
> I thought you wanted a 38 GHz unit - the 24 GHz antenna would be a -26 model, 
> and
> you could pair it up with a Canopy radio or anything else of course.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> wi...@metrocom.ca wrote ..
> > Hi Bryce,
> > 
> > Of course - there is an 8" antenna - 20 cm for us in Canada - that 
> > will do the job.
> > 
> > I do not know if it is an ETSI Class 4 antenna, which everyone should 
> > use if they can, but the Andrew VHLP200-38 is small enough. Keep in 
> > mind it would not be a dual-polarized antenna at that size.
> > 
> > Daniel Mullen
> > 
> > 
> > Bryce Duchcherer  wrote ..
> > > Does anybody know of a 24GHz radio that is smaller than 1'?
> > > It doesn't have to go very far, but we are wanting 24GHz.
> > > 
> > > Bryce D
> > > NETAGO
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio

[daniel . mullen]

Canada licensed 400 MHz from 24.250-24.450 GHz plus 25.050-25.250 GHz, so it is 
pretty much harmonized along the lines of the U.S., but the unlicensed 24 GHz 
band came along later.

The result is that if Bryce wants to go with unlicensed, he does not need dual 
polarity here, but he does need at least 33 dBi antenna gain. 

He has told me since that he wants to use unlicensed, so now we are looking at 
a different situation, because you cannot even get the valueline antenna in the 
lower 24 GHz.

Daniel

Fred Goldstein  wrote ..
> On 10/23/2014 6:36 PM, daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca wrote:
> > Sure -
> >
> > http://www.commscope.com/catalog/wireless/2147485870/product_details.aspx?id=27271
> >
> > I will sell it to you with a radio attached too! ;-)
> >
> 
> That's for the licensed 24.25-26.5 GHz band.  Was the original poster 
> referring to the unlicensed or licensed band?  Different rules -- the 
> smaller antenna has only 32 dB gain.
> 
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > Bryce Duchcherer  wrote ..
> > > Do you have a link?
> > >
> > > Bryce D
> > > NETAGO
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> > On Behalf
> > > Of daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 16:12
> > > To: WISPA General List
> > > Subject: Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio
> > >
> > > Bryce,
> > >
> > > I thought you wanted a 38 GHz unit - the 24 GHz antenna would be a
> > -26 model, and
> > > you could pair it up with a Canopy radio or anything else of course.
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > > wi...@metrocom.ca wrote ..
> > >> Hi Bryce,
> > >>
> > >> Of course - there is an 8" antenna - 20 cm for us in Canada - that
> > >> will do the job.
> > >>
> > >> I do not know if it is an ETSI Class 4 antenna, which everyone should
> > >> use if they can, but the Andrew VHLP200-38 is small enough. Keep in
> > >> mind it would not be a dual-polarized antenna at that size.
> > >>
> > >> Daniel Mullen
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Bryce Duchcherer  wrote ..
> > >>> Does anybody know of a 24GHz radio that is smaller than 1'?
> > >>> It doesn't have to go very far, but we are wanting 24GHz.
> > >>>
> > >>> Bryce D
> > >>> NETAGO
> > > ___
> > > Wireless mailing list
> > > Wireless@wispa.org
> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Wireless mailing list
> > > Wireless@wispa.org
> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> 
> -- 
> Fred R. Goldstein k1io fred "at" interisle.net
> Interisle Consulting Group
> +1 617 795 2701
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio

[daniel . mullen]

Commscope - the parent company - has a focus on carrier and system sales, so 
the unlicensed gear is not really interesting for them at this point, and thus, 
no product in the lower 24 GHz band.

Daniel


Daniel White  wrote ..
> Andrew does not make 24GHz unlicensed antennas.  Market is too small I guess.
>
> SAF uses Tongyu and Arkivator for this band.
>
> Daniel White - Managing Director
> SAF North America LLC
>
> Cell:  (303) 746-3590
> Skype: danieldwhite
> daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> > On Behalf Of daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca
> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 3:42 AM
> > To: WISPA General List
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio
> >
> > Canada licensed 400 MHz from 24.250-24.450 GHz plus 25.050-25.250 GHz, so
> > it is pretty much harmonized along the lines of the U.S., but the unlicensed
> > 24 GHz band came along later.
> >
> > The result is that if Bryce wants to go with unlicensed, he does not need 
> > dual
> > polarity here, but he does need at least 33 dBi antenna gain.
> >
> > He has told me since that he wants to use unlicensed, so now we are looking
> > at a different situation, because you cannot even get the valueline antenna
> > in the lower 24 GHz.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > Fred Goldstein  wrote ..
> > > On 10/23/2014 6:36 PM, daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca wrote:
> > > > Sure -
> > > >
> > > >
> > http://www.commscope.com/catalog/wireless/2147485870/product_details
> > > > .aspx?id=27271
> > > >
> > > > I will sell it to you with a radio attached too! ;-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > That's for the licensed 24.25-26.5 GHz band.  Was the original poster
> > > referring to the unlicensed or licensed band?  Different rules -- the
> > > smaller antenna has only 32 dB gain.
> > >
> > > > Daniel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bryce Duchcherer  wrote ..
> > > > > Do you have a link?
> > > > >
> > > > > Bryce D
> > > > > NETAGO
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
> > > > > [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> > > > On Behalf
> > > > > Of daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 16:12
> > > > > To: WISPA General List
> > > > > Subject: Re: [WISPA] small 24GHz radio
> > > > >
> > > > > Bryce,
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought you wanted a 38 GHz unit - the 24 GHz antenna would be a
> > > > -26 model, and
> > > > > you could pair it up with a Canopy radio or anything else of course.
> > > > >
> > > > > Daniel
> > > > >
> > > > > wi...@metrocom.ca wrote ..
> > > > >> Hi Bryce,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Of course - there is an 8" antenna - 20 cm for us in Canada -
> > > > >> that will do the job.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I do not know if it is an ETSI Class 4 antenna, which everyone
> > > > >> should use if they can, but the Andrew VHLP200-38 is small
> > > > >> enough. Keep in mind it would not be a dual-polarized antenna at that
> > size.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Daniel Mullen
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Bryce Duchcherer  wrote ..
> > > > >>> Does anybody know of a 24GHz radio that is smaller than 1'?
> > > > >>> It doesn't have to go very far, but we are wanting 24GHz.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Bryce D
> > > > >>> NETAGO
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Wireless mailing list
> > > > > Wireless@wispa.org
> > > > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Wireless mailing list
> > > > > Wireless@wispa.org
> > > > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Fred R. Goldstein k1io fred "at" interisle.net Interisle Consulting
> > > Group
> > > +1 617 795 2701
> > > ___
> > > Wireless mailing list
> > > Wireless@wispa.org
> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Looking for Service

[daniel . mullen]

Try Northwind Wireless or Storm Internet.

www.northwindwireless.com

www.storm.ca

Daniel

chris  wrote ..
> Hello,
> 
> I am researching connectivity for a family member, just looking to see if
> there's any list members who can reach them before researching other
> options.
> 
> Any canadian WISP that can provide service at:
> 
> Smith Road, Oxford Station, ON K0G 1T0
> 
> Thanks!
> chris
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage

[daniel . mullen]

Count me in for this.

Daniel


Josh Reynolds  wrote ..
> Yes, Adam can be a douche :)
> 
> I'd like for a bunch of us to get together and shell out $200 or so 
> each. If10 or 20 WISPs do it that pays for the development of the feature.
> 
> josh reynolds :: chief information officer
> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
> 
> On 12/01/2014 01:10 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> > Correct. The guy in charge can be a bit of a dick, but usually he's 
> > just pointing out where others failed to do their job. IE: crappy SNMP 
> > implementations.
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > Mike Hammett
> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
> > http://www.ics-il.com
> >
> > 
> >
> > 
> > *From: *"Josh Reynolds" 
> > *To: *wireless@wispa.org
> > *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 3:27:10 PM
> > *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage
> >
> > Only supports certain things Mike. You can't specify custom OIDs to 
> > monitor or anything like that, which is why a little over a year ago I 
> > was trying to get support from the UBNT community to correctly graph 
> > mikrotik and ubiquiti devices.
> >
> > I ended up getting busy with it so I haven't sent the request and cash 
> > to Adam, but it should be a couple grand to get everything supported 
> > (AirFibers, etc.)
> >
> > Other than that,we have been using it here at SPITwSPOTS for over a 
> > year for switches and routers, and I've been using it myself for a 
> > little over 2.
> > josh reynolds :: chief information officer
> > spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com
> > On 12/01/2014 11:59 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> >
> > If we're going to start talking about graphing systems, I suggest
> > you all look at Observium. Justin Miller's blog has some great
> > articles on setting it up.
> >
> > http://dynstatic.net/
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > Mike Hammett
> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
> > http://www.ics-il.com
> >
> > 
> > 
> >
> > 
> > *From: *"Sean Heskett" 
> > *To: *"WISPA General List" 
> > *Sent: *Monday, December 1, 2014 2:51:10 PM
> > *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] I need to monitor bandwidth usage
> >
> > Cacti
> >
> > Cactiez is a easy install cd that will format the drive, install
> > Linux and all the cacti software etc
> >
> > On Monday, December 1, 2014, ~NGL~  > > wrote:
> >
> > I need an inexpensive means to keep track of under 100 clients
> > bandwidth usage.
> > Any suggestions?
> > Thanx
> > NGL
> > If you can read this Thank A Teacher.
> > And if it's in English Thank A Soldier!
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Wireless mailing list
> > Wireless@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Wireless mailing list
> > Wireless@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Wireless mailing list
> > Wireless@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Wireless mailing list
> > Wireless@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G

[daniel . mullen]

Using 200 MHz of bandwidth - just wait until Ubiquiti decides to do 10x channel 
sizes!

Daniel

Gino Villarini  wrote ..
> 
> ow.ly/FBFcX
> 
> 
> Gino A. Villarini
> President
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> www.aeronetpr.com
> @aeronetpr
> 
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G

[daniel . mullen]

It is a better idea we get higher throughput with better modulations instead of 
simply grabbing larger pieces of spectrum. We cannot make ever larger channel 
sizes without running into problems!


Daniel


Gino Villarini  wrote ..
> How is that going to make a difference?
> 
> 
> 
> Gino A. Villarini
> President
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> www.aeronetpr.com  
> @aeronetpr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/9/14, 11:11 PM, "daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca"
>  wrote:
> 
> >Using 200 MHz of bandwidth - just wait until Ubiquiti decides to do 10x
> >channel sizes!
> >
> >Daniel
> >
> >Gino Villarini  wrote ..
> >> 
> >> ow.ly/FBFcX
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Gino A. Villarini
> >> President
> >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> >> www.aeronetpr.com
> >> @aeronetpr
> >> 
> 
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G

[daniel . mullen]

the borg moves other users away from 
> their
> active channels, moving them to open channels
> 
> I understand some of this sounds impossible, but that's because many of us 
> don't
> yet understand what's meant by "dynamic" as it relates to machines talking to 
> machines
> in real time.
> 
> A reason I submit this all matters internationally is that U.S. adoption of 
> this
> band for commercial use will help drive scale, further reducing cost globally 
> and
> encouraging lots of device makers to build devices (what the LTE world calls 
> "UEs"
> for the band -- a cell phone is a UE, as is a fixed wireless CPE). I fully 
> expect
> things like IP cameras, traffic systems, parking meters, etc. to have embedded
> 3.5x LTE chipsets, not to mention gobs of traditional fixed wireless "UE" 
> options.
> 
> Over the years, I've been pretty spot on with my market predictions re fixed 
> wireless
> -- which companies survive, which spectrum comes along, use uptake, etc. -- 
> and
> in some cases I've played a literal direct role in enabling it (see my 
> comments
> in this FCC transcript re advised rules for 3.65 band way back in 2002, 3 
> years
> before it was released http://transition.fcc.gov/sptf/files/0801fcc.pdf). I am
> hoping my streak continues.
> 
> 
> Patrick Leary
>  M 727.501.3735 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
> Of Paolo Di Francesco
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:18 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD 
> Carrier
> Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G
> 
> will that spectrum be licensed?
> 
> 
> > Those are good points Mike, and it explains one reason I'm so excited 
> > over 3.550-3.650 MHz. I think the coming spectrum is a game changer 
> > for many reasons, this among them.
> >
> > *Patrick Leary*
> >
> > ***M*727.501.3735
> >
> > <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>
> >
> >
> > *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> > *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:26 AM
> > *To:* WISPA General List
> > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD 
> > and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G
> >
> > I know of eICIC. It's still increasing efficiency as you're now doing 
> > this all in one channel everywhere vs. one channel per radio or a 
> > couple channels per tower.
> >
> > That said, in unlicensed spectrum that is busy like 5 GHz or 2.4, 
> > you're not going to use the same channel everywhere as it would be 
> > impossible to do so due to external interferers.
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > Mike Hammett
> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
> > http://www.ics-il.com
> >
> > Image removed by sender. <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>Image removed 
> > by sender.
> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>Image
> > removed by sender. 
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>Imag
> > e removed by sender. <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> >
> > --
> > --
> >
> > *From: *"Patrick Leary" 
> > *To: *"WISPA General List" 
> > *Sent: *Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7:22:36 AM
> > *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD 
> > andFDDCarrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G
> >
> > It is beyond basic concepts like increased efficiency. LTE goes much 
> > further. See my last post.
> >
> > *Patrick Leary*
> >
> > *M*727.501.3735
> >
> > <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>
> >
> >
> > *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> > *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7:41 AM
> > *To:* WISPA General List
> > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD 
> > and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G
> >
> > Why not allow both?
> >
> > I think every vendor is releasing equipment with better spectral 
> > efficiency.
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > Mike Hammett
> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
> > http://www.ics-il.com
> >
> > Image removed by sender. <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>Image removed 
&g

Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G

[daniel . mullen]

;> > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD
> >> > and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G
> >> >
> >> > I know of eICIC. It's still increasing efficiency as you're now doing
> >> > this all in one channel everywhere vs. one channel per radio or a
> >> > couple channels per tower.
> >> >
> >> > That said, in unlicensed spectrum that is busy like 5 GHz or 2.4,
> >> > you're not going to use the same channel everywhere as it would be
> >> > impossible to do so due to external interferers.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -
> >> > Mike Hammett
> >> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >> > http://www.ics-il.com
> >> >
> >> > Image removed by sender. <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>Image
> >>removed
> >> > by sender.
> >> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>Image
> >> > removed by sender.
> >> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>Imag
> >> > e removed by sender. <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > *From: *"Patrick Leary" 
> >> > *To: *"WISPA General List" 
> >> > *Sent: *Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7:22:36 AM
> >> > *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD
> >> > andFDDCarrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G
> >> >
> >> > It is beyond basic concepts like increased efficiency. LTE goes much
> >> > further. See my last post.
> >> >
> >> > *Patrick Leary*
> >> >
> >> > *M*727.501.3735
> >> >
> >> > <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> >> > *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
> >> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 7:41 AM
> >> > *To:* WISPA General List
> >> > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD
> >> > and FDD Carrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G
> >> >
> >> > Why not allow both?
> >> >
> >> > I think every vendor is releasing equipment with better spectral
> >> > efficiency.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -
> >> > Mike Hammett
> >> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >> > http://www.ics-il.com
> >> >
> >> > Image removed by sender. <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>Image
> >>removed
> >> > by sender.
> >> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>Image
> >> > removed by sender.
> >> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>Imag
> >> > e removed by sender. <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > *From: *"daniel mullen" 
> >> > *To: *"WISPA General List" 
> >> > *Sent: *Wednesday, December 10, 2014 6:36:58 AM
> >> > *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] Nokia achieves 4.2 Gbps LTE speeds using TDD
> >> > and FDDCarrier Aggregation #GettingCloserTo10G
> >> >
> >> > It is a better idea we get higher throughput with better modulations
> >> > instead of simply grabbing larger pieces of spectrum. We cannot make
> >> > ever larger channel sizes without running into problems!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Daniel
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Gino Villarini  wrote ..
> >> > > How is that going to make a difference?
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Gino A. Villarini
> >> > > President
> >> > > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> >> > > www.aeronetpr.com
> >> > > @aeronetpr
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 12/9/14, 11:11 PM, "daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca"
> >> > >  wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > &g

[WISPA] Mimosa versus AirFiber versus Cambium PTP650

[daniel . mullen]

Hi -

I am looking to hear from anyone who has tested the 5 GHz Point to Point 
products from Mimosa, Ubiquiti, and Cambium and see what are the clear 
advantages of these versus one another.

Thanks!

Daniel Mullen

ISN Inc.
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

[daniel . mullen]

True throughput and longer range, plus a metal dish means real money.

Daniel

Gino Villarini  wrote ..
> Dang! 2x price for 250 mbps more, ouch!
> 
> 
> 
> Gino A. Villarini
> President
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> www.aeronetpr.com
> @aeronetpr
> 
> 
> 
> From: "ben.mo...@ubnt.com" 
> mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com>>
> Reply-To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
> Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM
> To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced
> 
> Hi Gino -
> 
> Initial shipments are in transit to distributors so units will be received in 
> early
> to mid January.
> 
> MSRP is $6k/link.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ben
> 
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Gino Villarini 
> mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>>
> wrote:
> Just got a email from UBNT
> 
> AF24HD announced, similar to AF24, bigger Rx dish (40db) 256 qam 1 Gbps Fdx
> 
> http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber24/
> 
> No pricing or availability info, Ben?
> 
> 
> 
> Gino A. Villarini
> President
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> www.aeronetpr.com
> @aeronetpr
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

[daniel . mullen]

The new logo and the new positioning cost money.

That said, if they want to 'go pro' and chase the higher end of the market, it 
IS time that they provide true specifications rather than very best case 
scenario 'two-way traffic' numbers as being the transfer speeds. If I showed 
that to an engineer at my former employer he would toss the flyer over his 
shoulder - '2 Gbps air but a 1 Gbps copper interface, nonsense!' and that would 
be that.

It is okay for long-time UBNT users who understand they need to interpret the 
numbers, but it is not how you ever break into the carrier market.

Daniel


Mathew Howard  wrote ..
> You would think they could've put an SFP port in there for that price...
> 
> 
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [wireless-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of 
> Mike
> Hammett [wispawirel...@ics-il.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 1:59 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced
> 
> Still no SFPs.
> 
> Would have liked to see higher QAM.
> 
> Would have liked to see > 1 GB interface.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
> 
> [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]
> 
> 
> From: "Gino Villarini" 
> To: "WISPA General List" 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 12:45:01 PM
> Subject: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced
> 
> Just got a email from UBNT
> 
> AF24HD announced, similar to AF24, bigger Rx dish (40db) 256 qam 1 Gbps Fdx
> 
> http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber24/
> 
> No pricing or availability info, Ben?
> 
> 
> 
> Gino A. Villarini
> President
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> www.aeronetpr.com
> @aeronetpr
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced

[daniel . mullen]

If it is the same as with us, it is because the air has *less* moisture in it 
overall. Most of our links are within sight of water.

For a snowflake to form you need six water molecules - that is what gives the 
shape to each snowflake - and they continue to form as they go. On a really 
crisp, clear day the air is incredibly dry such that the links are just 
perfect. We see that on our Trango links.-

Daniel



Matt Hoppes  wrote ..
> Have you noticed your signal levels IMPROVE when it's snowing?  I have,
> and can't explain that..
> 
> On 12/17/14, 2:40 PM, Chris Ruschmann wrote:
> > When I googled the rainiest places in the US, it doesn't show Alaska,
> > But I laugh at the places they do show and how little of rain they get
> > compared to us. Mine actually works better in snow.
> > 
> > I use Airfiber without issues. Align you link correctly and don't push
> > the limits and you should be fine.
> > 
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:37 AM,  > > wrote:
> > 
> > True throughput and longer range, plus a metal dish means real money.
> > 
> > Daniel
> > 
> > Gino Villarini mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>> wrote ..
> > > Dang! 2x price for 250 mbps more, ouch!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Gino A. Villarini
> > > President
> > > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> > > www.aeronetpr.com 
> > > @aeronetpr
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: "ben.mo...@ubnt.com
> >  > >"  >  > >>
> > > Reply-To: WISPA General List  >  > >>
> > > Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM
> > > To: WISPA General List  >  > >>
> > > Subject: Re: [WISPA] AF24 HD Annouced
> > >
> > > Hi Gino -
> > >
> > > Initial shipments are in transit to distributors so units will be 
> > received
> in early
> > > to mid January.
> > >
> > > MSRP is $6k/link.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ben
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Gino Villarini
> >  >  > >>
> > > wrote:
> > > Just got a email from UBNT
> > >
> > > AF24HD announced, similar to AF24, bigger Rx dish (40db) 256 qam 1 
> > Gbps
> Fdx
> > >
> > > http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber24/
> > >
> > > No pricing or availability info, Ben?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Gino A. Villarini
> > > President
> > > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> > > www.aeronetpr.com 
> > > @aeronetpr
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Wireless mailing list
> > > Wireless@wispa.org
> >  > >
> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > 
> > ___
> > Wireless mailing list
> > Wireless@wispa.org 
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Wireless mailing list
> > Wireless@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > 
> ___
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story

[daniel . mullen]

At the air interface there is not much difference between WiMAX and LTE, and 
WiMAX had better characteristics for power consumption and other 'greenfield' 
factors, but LTE was the pathway for GSM operators, so almost all of the mobile 
operators in Europe committed to it, and the Verizon Wireless co-owner at the 
time, Vodafone, would have influenced the decision greatly. Lower deployment 
costs to upgrade existing networks and existing vendor relationships with the 
GSM manufacturers made the decision easy.

Now imagine if Cambium and Ubiquiti announced LTE gear tomorrow? I bet quite a 
few members here would look at it.

Daniel


Josh Luthman  wrote ..
> Well Wimax vs LTE I think was won when Verizon decided on it.
> 
> It's like Bluray vs HDDVD - porn chose Bluray.  Or Beta vs VHS - porn chose
> VHS.
> 
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Patrick Leary 
> wrote:
> >
> >  Really, Guys, you are sounding like silly kids. Remind about it being
> > just like WiMAX as you pull that LTE phone out of your pocket.
> >
> >
> >
> > *Patrick Leary*
> >
> > *M* 727.501.3735
> >
> > 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
> > Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:09 PM
> > *To:* WISPA General List
> > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story
> >
> >
> >
> > The next idea is always a better one.
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > Mike Hammett
> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
> > http://www.ics-il.com
> >
> > [image: Image removed by sender.] [image:
> > Image removed by sender.]
> > [image:
> > Image removed by sender.]
> > [image:
> > Image removed by sender.] 
> >
> >   --
> >
> > *From: *"Josh Luthman" 
> > *To: *"WISPA General List" 
> > *Sent: *Wednesday, December 17, 2014 7:08:04 PM
> > *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story
> >
> > 5 years ago it was WiMAX vs LTE.  Didn't people say the same thing you are
> > now about WiMAX?
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> >
> > On Dec 17, 2014 7:06 PM, "Patrick Leary"  wrote:
> >
> > Not sure I understand the question in the sense WiMAX does not belong in
> > the discussion. WiMAX was always at best a nichey thing, embraced by almost
> > no large operator, save for a variety of small country fixed operators, not
> > a global standard operating across most bands and universally accepted by
> > carriers.
> >
> >
> >
> > Just as Wi-Fi has subsumed pretty much everything else in local area
> > wireless (and is now in fact synonymous with WLAN), LTE will do the same
> > for PMP outdoor beyond commonly accepted Wi-Fi ranges (WISP Wi-Fi ranges
> > are not commonly accepted in a macro market sense, but rather exist as a
> > proprietary model for a deeply niche market).
> >
> >
> >
> > *Patrick Leary*
> >
> > *M* 727.501.3735
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
> > Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 17, 2014 6:22 PM
> > *To:* WISPA General List
> > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story
> >
> >
> >
> > 5 years ago, how did it look with Wimax and LTE?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Patrick Leary 
> > wrote:
> >
> > I'm not betting on a company at all. I'm betting on an industry. No one
> > vendor is doing the LTE R&D. There's more R&D being invested in LTE
> > ecosystem wide than any other telecom technology in history I suspect.
> >
> >
> >
> > *Patrick Leary*
> >
> > *M* 727.501.3735
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
> > Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 17, 2014 6:17 PM
> > *To:* WISPA General List
> > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story
> >
> >
> >
> > Well you're betting on a company that's not doing hot against Verizon and
> > AT&T =P
> >
> >
> >
> > When they start competing against me I'll pay attention.  Since I'm
> > confident they're not able to make money in rural areas like Clear or Open
> > Range couldn't, I doubt third time is a charm.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Patrick Leary 
> > wrote:
> >
> > Like I've been telling folks, LTE wi

Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story

[daniel . mullen]

+1

Darin Steffl  wrote ..
> The only wimax phones that existed were a few phones on sprint where
> clearwire had built out coverage. No other national carrier had wimax and
> it was never fully adopted. Now every national carrier and many regional
> ones have LTE networks and have committed to that standard. This is
> worldwide as well with many carriers going LTE as their new data network.
> Wimax was never fully adopted by any industry while LTE has shown it is.
> 
> I agree with Patrick that many people here are ignorant of the standards
> and the scalability opportunities of LTE. I myself am ignorant of the facts
> as well but I'm learning not just from Patrick but reading about the new
> LTE releases coming up so I can respond here with educated answers. I
> suggest other operators do their research as well instead of just replying
> with childish answers to this thread. It is hurting our reputation to whine
> and complain about a new product and LTE standards when we don't know what
> we're talking about. This technology is working for operators who are using
> it so please continue to do more research as we hear from more people
> deploying it and then ask fair, educated questions like adults. Thank you
> 
> On Wednesday, December 17, 2014, Robert Andrews 
> wrote:
> 
> >  Well it's the invisible 800 lb gorilla for the rest of the tech in the
> > Internet...
> >
> >
> > On 12/17/14 5:45 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> >
> > Uhm not sure that's the industry that would sway something like that...
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> > On Dec 17, 2014 8:39 PM, "Mike Hammett"  > > wrote:
> >
> >>  If porn chooses WiMAX will it come back?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> Mike Hammett
> >> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >> http://www.ics-il.com
> >>
> >>  
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>
> >>  --
> >> *From: *"Josh Luthman"  >> >
> >> *To: *"WISPA General List"  >> >
> >> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 17, 2014 7:37:06 PM
> >> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story
> >>
> >> Well Wimax vs LTE I think was won when Verizon decided on it.
> >>
> >>  It's like Bluray vs HDDVD - porn chose Bluray.  Or Beta vs VHS - porn
> >> chose VHS.
> >>
> >>
> >>  Josh Luthman
> >> Office: 937-552-2340
> >> Direct: 937-552-2343
> >> 1100 Wayne St
> >> Suite 1337
> >> Troy, OH 45373
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Patrick Leary  >> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Really, Guys, you are sounding like silly kids. Remind about it being
> >>> just like WiMAX as you pull that LTE phone out of your pocket.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Patrick Leary*
> >>>
> >>> *M* 727.501.3735
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org
> >>>  [mailto:
> >>> wireless-boun...@wispa.org
> >>> ] *On
> >>> Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
> >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:09 PM
> >>> *To:* WISPA General List
> >>> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The next idea is always a better one.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> Mike Hammett
> >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >>> http://www.ics-il.com
> >>>
> >>> [image: Image removed by sender.] [image:
> >>> Image removed by sender.]
> >>> [image:
> >>> Image removed by sender.]
> >>> [image:
> >>> Image removed by sender.] 
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>
> >>> *From: *"Josh Luthman"  >>> >
> >>> *To: *"WISPA General List"  >>> >
> >>> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 17, 2014 7:08:04 PM
> >>> *Subject: *Re: [WISPA] AeroNetPR wants to share this story
> >>>
> >>> 5 years ago it was WiMAX vs LTE.  Didn't people say the same thing you
> >>> are now about WiMAX?
> >>>
> >>> Josh Luthman
> >>> Office: 937-552-2340
> >>> Direct: 937-552-2343
> >>> 1100 Wayne St
> >>> Suite 1337
> >>> Troy, OH 45373
> >>>
> >>> On Dec 17, 2014 7:06 PM, "Patrick Leary"  >>> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Not sure I understand the question in the sense WiMAX does not belong in
> >>> the discussion. WiMAX was always at best a nichey thing, embraced by 
> >>> almost
> >>> no large operator, save for a variety of small country fixed operators, 
> >>> not
> >>> a global standard operating across most bands and universally accepted by
> >>> carriers.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Just as Wi-Fi has subsumed pretty much everything else in local area
> >>> wireless (and is now in fact synonymous with WLAN), LTE will do the same
> >>> for PMP outdoor beyond commonly accepted Wi-Fi ranges (WISP Wi-Fi ranges
> >>> are not commonly accepted in

Re: [WISPA] Fake Survey Ad/Scam from Zedo.com

[daniel . mullen]

This is a typical data gathering ad - they pull up the customer IP address to 
use that name to make it more 'trustworthy' for the user.

You really should call a lawyer to do a notice to them and make a complaint to 
the FTC.

Daniel


Chris Fabien  wrote ..
> We are getting reports from our users that "we took your online survey"
> 
> Finally happened to catch it on my personal computer, it is a fake survey
> that offers $120 gift for taking a survey from LakeNet LLC, asks a series
> of questions about our service and then lets the user select their choice
> of some junk cosmetics or a free credit report.
> 
> I'm not even sure what the point of this is, but I tracked it back to
> Zedo.com which is an advertising agency. I've tried calling them, only able
> to get to a voicemail box which tells me to email their support address,
> which I've done
> 
> Is this type of thing even legal for them to do? It's totally
> misrepresenting their ad as being from my company.
> 
> I'm attaching a screenshot.
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> Chris Fabien
> LakeNet LLC
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik - MEF

[Daniel Mullen]

At 15:29 31.12.2014, you wrote:
>In fact it's so simple that even Verizon can provision it.


+1 from a Verizon Reseller. ;-) 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

[Daniel Mullen]

+1.


At 05:05 PM 17-06-2016, you wrote:
>I believe the canary would say people have deployed but can not speak
>yet :P  Watch lists and Facebook, I'm sure details will forth come very
>soon.
>
>On 6/17/16 3:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> > Does anyone besides the guys in Amarillo have this gear deployed?  Care
> > to comment on/off list?
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Wireless mailing list
> > Wireless@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
>___
>Wireless mailing list
>Wireless@wispa.org
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] DNS Name Resolver for WISP

[Daniel Mullen]

I know cira.ca has a service for ISPs. If you 
need a specific contact there let me know, off-list.


Daniel

At 04:59 PM 23-06-2016, you wrote:


Self hosted.  I suggest unbound or bind.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 23, 2016 3:56 PM, "Colton Conor" 
<colton.co...@gmail.com> wrote:
What dns name solvers do you use to hand out to 
your customers via DHCP and why? Today we just 
hand out Google's 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 as a name 
resolvers. I recently learned about OpenDNS's 
free service for homes where a home user can 
monitor and potentially block certain websites, 
but that would require the home to signup at 
open dns, and then enter open DNS in their 
router. However if we handed out OpenDNS's IPs 
instead of googles, and provided a gateway, then 
that would remove that step of the client having 
to enter opendns IPs into their router right?Â


Does OpenDNS have a service for ISP's? That 
gives us insight as to where traffic on our 
network is heading based dns lookups? I know 
about Netflow etc, but doing this though DNS 
seems like a cool option as well. We wouldn't 
want to block anything as an ISP, but it would 
be useful to know the top visited site by our 
customers is facebook.com for example.


If not OpenDNS, then is there some other hosted DNS service for ISP's?Â



___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] What would you use a drone for?

[Daniel Mullen]

Andreas, beware!

If you are using is commercially, you MUST be 
licensed, and if you are using it 'for recreation' there now are strict rules.


https://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/opssvs/flying-drone-safely-legally.html


Rules for recreational drones

If you fly your drone for fun and it weighs more 
than 250 g and up to 35 kg, you do not need 
special permission from Transport Canada to fly.


Follow the basic safety rules below. Not doing so 
may put lives, aircraft and property at risk. If 
you fly where you are not allowed or choose not 
to follow any of the rules below, you could face fines of up to $3,000.



Do not fly your drone:

   * higher than 90 m above the ground
   * closer than 75 m from buildings, vehicles, 
vessels, animals, people/crowds
   * closer than nine km from the centre of an 
aerodrome (any airport, heliport, seaplane base 
or anywhere that aircraft take-off and land)

   * within controlled or restricted airspace
   * within nine km of a forest fire
   * where it could interfere with police or first responders
   * at night or in clouds
   * if you can’t keep it in sight at all times
   * if you are not within 500 m of your drone
   * if your name, address, and telephone number 
are not clearly marked on your drone.


The list above is an overview of the new rules 
for recreational drone users. Consult the 
Interim 
Order Respecting the Use of Model Aircraft for 
the full list of provisions. Members of the 
Model Aeronautics 
Association of Canada (MAAC) who operate at MAAC 
sanctioned fields or events are not subject to these rules.


[]


Flying 
for fun? New rules for recreational drone users

(PDF, 4 MB)


Tips for recreational drone users:

   * Fly your drone during daylight and in good weather.
   * Keep your drone where you can see it with 
your own eyes – not through an on-board camera, monitor or smartphone.
   * Make sure your drone is safe for flight 
before take-off. Ask yourself, for example: Are 
the batteries fully charged? Is it too cold to fly?
   * Respect the privacy of others. Avoid flying 
over private property or taking photos or videos without permission.


Non-recreational drone: If you fly your drone (or 
UAV) for work or research, or if it weighs more 
than 35 kg, you must get a Special Flight 
Operations Certificate (SFOC). The SFOC tells you 
how and where you are allowed to use your UAV.


For more information on the SFOC, read 
Getting 
permission to fly your drone.



Does Transport Canada approve schools that can teach me to fly my UAV safely?

We do not approve UAV training organizations or 
recognize certificates for UAV operations.


All UAV pilots are responsible to ensure they 
have the right level of knowledge, experience and 
skills required to safely operate. You may access 
UAV pilot training from sources including:

   * UAV operators and manufacturers
   * manned aviation flight training organizations
   * third parties


Legal requirements

When flying a UAV (non-recreational drone) in Canada, you must:
   * follow the rules in the Canadian Aviation Regulations:
   * section 602.41 – 
Unmanned 
air vehicles
   * respect the 
Criminal 
Code, your provincial Trespass Act, as well as 
all applicable municipal, provincial, and territorial laws that apply


When flying a model aircraft (recreational drone) in Canada you must:
   * follow the rules of the 
Interim 
Order Respecting the Use of Model Aircraft


Transport Canada inspectors investigate reports 
of unsafe and illegal drone use. We may involve 
local police if other laws (e.g., the Criminal 
Code and privacy laws) have been broken.


You could face serious consequences – including 
up to $25,000 in fines and/or jail time – if you:

   * put aircraft at risk
   * fly where you are not allowed
   * endanger anyone’s safety

For example:
   * If you fly where your drone recreationally 
where you are not allowed or choose not to follow 
any of the rules outlined in the 
Interim 
Order Respecting the Use of Model Aircraft you 
could face fines of up to $3,000.
   * If you fly a UAV without an SFOC and should 
have one, we may fine up to $5,000 for a person and $25,000 for a corporation.
   * If you do not follow the requirements of 
your SFOC, we may fine up to $3,000 for a person 
and $15,000 for a corporation.



New regulations

Transport Canada is developing new regulations to 
addres

Re: [WISPA] Prayers for Mac Dearman

[Daniel Mullen]

God of Health and Wholeness,
We gather this morning to pray
For our dear friend Mac
as we desire for her to be restored
to the balance of good health.

We pray for a successful surgery and for the
Medical staff who will be working with him/her
so that, he/she may fully recover,
and return with renewed zeal
to the daily life that we share.


At 01:56 PM 17-04-2017, you wrote:
I am certain he does not want any big attention about this but I am 
posting it anyway. Mac Dearman is having heart bypass surgery this 
morning. I know many of you know Mac on here so please say a prayer 
for an old friend to be healed. Mac was one of the founding members 
of WISPA and led the efforts to put Mississippi and Louisiana back 
together post-Katrina. He is still operating his WISP in Rayville, 
LA and he is a dear friend to me and many others.

Thank you,
John Scrivner

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless