It may come to that, but all of our back haul
links are 5 GHz and it was always intended to be
kept 'clean' for this purpose. If we could count
on using the 3.65 GHz for backhaul it would mean
switching the links on ~20 towers but help us get out of the 2.4 GHz mess.
Daniel
At 00:43 01.08.2013, you wrote:
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_CE1F0B6B1B2E1gavaeronetprcom_"
Why don't you use PMP450 in 5ghz?
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
From: Daniel Mullen <<mailto:wi...@metrocom.ca>wi...@metrocom.ca>
Reply-To: WISPA General List <<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>wireless@wispa.org>
Date: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 6:22 PM
To: WISPA General List <<mailto:wireless@wispa.org>wireless@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Recommendations for Ubiquiti 3.65 site
If this helps:
We are in Canada - spectrum license time: one week. Effort: one page letter.
There are three 900 MHz Canopy sectors and an
omni serving at least 24 customers who are now on 2.4 GHz Canopy.
Currently the backhaul is on 5 GHz but this will
need to change to support a ~300 Mbps link.
The site is on a hill with a 96' tower
overlooking the coast, with all of the 30 or so
2.4 GHz customers being inside of 1000 yards,
and perhaps a few more up to 2000 yards away.
My plan was to put up two Titanium base
stations, each with a 90° antenna of unknown
source as of yet, and to put up to 24 customers
on each sector to offer an upgrade to either 5
Mbps or 10 Mbps connections. These are existing
customers, so it would be free radio rental and
free installation in return for 24 month contracts.
I would be more than willing to deploy something
like the PMP450 or Runcom LTE stuff, but we need
to do this in the next couple of weeks.
Daniel
At 18:20 31.07.2013, you wrote:
Use NSM365 with a dish on all but the shortest links.
Keep distances short, 4 miles or less.
AMQ above 80%
TX CCQ above 75%
RX level or -70 or better
AMQ, TX CCQ, & RX level must ALL be at or above those values.
Keep SM counts below 45 or so.
Use KP Performance antennas or Ubiquiti antennas with RF Armor shields.
Once the above is done, start saving money for
the upcoming 3.65 PMP450 (don't hold your
breath though) and replace the Ubiquiti gear when it becomes available.
On Jul 31, 2013, at 9:01 AM,
<<mailto:daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca>
daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca>
<<mailto:daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca> daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca> wrote:
We are putting up a 3.65 GHz system next week
to take existing customers off of an existing Canopy 2.4GHz system.
Is there anyone who has deployed the 3 Ghz
gear from Ubnt and could recommend which model
of CPE and if there anything to know to avoid
a steep 'learning curve' since we have never
deployed anything from Ubiquiti until now.
Suggestions as to the best prices are most welcome too!
Thanks,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
<mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless