Re: [WSG] Table-less site not displaying in Mac IE?
hi, it looks ok on ie osx. i made a screenshot so you can see yourself http://www.digitalsushi.ch/screenshot.jpg greetings patirk breitenmoser Am 09.12.2004 um 14:36 schrieb Marilyn Langfeld: Looks fine here, OSX 10.3.5 on a TiPowerbook. Yes, OS 10 is the same as OSX. One of those *great* marketing ideas! Best regards, Marilyn Langfeld http://www.langfeldesigns.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1.301.598.3300 business phone +1.301.598.0532 fax +1.202.390.8847 mobile On Dec 9, 2004, at 7:52 AM, Bert Doorn wrote: I'm stumped on this one (partly because I can't see the problem myself as I don't have a Mac and can't afford one) www.naturalhealthacademy.edu.au is valid xhtml1.0 strict with valid css. It looks fine in MSIE6, Firefox 1.0 and Opera 7.54 (on PC). Also appears to be fine on Safari (per Dan Vine's iCapture) However, my client reported the following feedback: A colleague of mine in Canberra is unable to get our website up. He is running Macintosh OS 10 and MS explorer My client is concerned he may be losing a few visitors a month.Good ole MSIE on Mac... Of course, I could fix it by using a table for layout, but in the spirit of web standards I'm trying not to. Could someone with Mac IE have a look at the site and tell me what they see (or don't see)? Email me off-list if you like. If you do see a problem please let me know what you see (or don't see). If you have any ideas about the cause, I'm listening. So far, all I can think of is that it's something to do with margins or fixed/absolute positioning, but I could be mistaken. As an aside, is OS 10 the same as OS X? Thanks in advance -- Bert Doorn, Web Developer Better Web Design http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/ Fast-loading, user-friendly websites ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** mit freundlichen grüssen patrik breitenmoser braincandy gmbh fullservice kreativagentur langgasse 91 ch-9008 st. gallen phone: +41 (0)71 534 77 89 fax: +41 (0)71 534 77 20 mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.braincandy.ch _
[WSG] Best approach
Hi, I'm doing a template for a organization and the want a entry page from where people can select which page they want. My problem is they want something like this http://www.esrum.dk/ny_web/esrum_forside.htm and they insist on having rollover effect for the images (image swap). Next problem is since it mostly schools using their website many have turned javascript off by default (according to their logs it's about 35%) so the sample above wont work for them (a sample they did themselves BTW) I made a quick sample without the img swap thingy http://www.mouseriders.dk/esrum/index.htm but they insist on the img swap. So now I'm wondering which approach would be best using css and no javascript getting the layout as in my sample but with img swap? Thanks for any help Kim ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] XHTML and Forums - A Red Rag and the Bull
Steven Clark wrote: Agree or not its a common event nowdays to be accosted by some one-issue madman or another over some standards related issue, not all of them in proper perspective either. I saw one of the threads to which you were referring at webdeveloper.com. I think you would have been better off just pointing out what some of the advantages of XHTML are, such as: future proof, XSLT, and easier debugging. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Best approach
Thanks all... should keep me busy tonight :) Kim ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] Site Critique - do your worst...
...I can take it because I value the opions of users of this list :) So do your best (/worst) *awkward grimace* Hello again all, Been beavering away on a new site: http://www.sammyco.co.uk/acttrwebpre/PRE%20VALIDATION.htm -still debugging for firefox, anybody want offer up fixes? -real reason for this post is a site critique before I go steam-rollering into filling it with content... Oh and its already been suggested that the read is TOO much !? Look forward to hearing any thoughts if anyones got time. Oh and by the way it's fully validated xhtml css. Cheers ya'll ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Site Critique - do your worst...
Hi Sam I couldn't tell if the disjointed, oddly overlapping elements were intentional or not. It looks like you have a conflict in your width or margins which make the banner on the right drop below the content on the left. The scattered links on the right look like something is supposed to happen with them but the style is missing. Why are you duplicating the top nav below the header? I'm looking at it in firefox 1.0/win. The white text in red bar is difficult to read. Ted -Original Message- From: Sam Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 10:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WSG] Site Critique - do your worst... ...I can take it because I value the opions of users of this list :) So do your best (/worst) *awkward grimace* Hello again all, Been beavering away on a new site: http://www.sammyco.co.uk/acttrwebpre/PRE%20VALIDATION.htm -still debugging for firefox, anybody want offer up fixes? -real reason for this post is a site critique before I go steam-rollering into filling it with content... Oh and its already been suggested that the read is TOO much !? Look forward to hearing any thoughts if anyones got time. Oh and by the way it's fully validated xhtml css. Cheers ya'll ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Best approach (new question)
Now I've looked at the samples and it seem it can't be done without having some kind of text as the link and they want to use their own font on the imgs. (I know... but they pay me and I do what they want... almost) So can the same effect as a javascript img swap possible using CSS only? Thanks in advance Kim ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site Critique - do your worst...
Hello Sam; It would be a really good idea to validate your document first. There are 44 errors in your markup including a second doctype with an xml declaration! Fix those and I'll bet most of your problems will go away ... :o) HTH's ... Bill. William Haggerty VWH Web Services http://vwh.ca - Original Message - From: Sam Hutchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 10:19 AM Subject: [WSG] Site Critique - do your worst... ...I can take it because I value the opions of users of this list :) So do your best (/worst) *awkward grimace* Hello again all, Been beavering away on a new site: http://www.sammyco.co.uk/acttrwebpre/PRE%20VALIDATION.htm -still debugging for firefox, anybody want offer up fixes? -real reason for this post is a site critique before I go steam-rollering into filling it with content... Oh and its already been suggested that the read is TOO much !? Look forward to hearing any thoughts if anyones got time. Oh and by the way it's fully validated xhtml css. Cheers ya'll ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site Critique - do your worst...
At 10:19 AM 12/9/04, Sam Hutchinson wrote: ...I can take it because I value the opions of users of this list :) http://www.sammyco.co.uk/acttrwebpre/PRE%20VALIDATION.htm Sam, Action Transport looks like a great project! Here are some very quick comments: I suggest making the left-hand thumbnails redundant links to each section, so that you can navigate either by clicking on read more or by clicking on the image next to it. Your use of the same coloration for links and headlines is confusing. Better I think to flag links uniquely so the visitor can learn quickly what text is active and what isn't. The Birdbox image has fallen down below the left column, probably because you haven't allowed enough room for it to float next to the left col. Try counting your pixels more carefully, or perhaps better yet design your layout more loosely so it won't break as easily. I find the white text on red background (I was right to trust Action Transport...) too difficult to read. I find the slowly unfolding nav submenus clever and irritating, and show off someone's javascript tricks more than they show off a concern for the site visitor. I would greatly reduce the unfold duration or scrap it and just let the submenus pop down instantly. When I hover over items in your right-panel nav menu, the text disappears (turns white?). Resizing text larger in Firefox (whether using FF's controls or the a+ control on your page) garbles your page heading and renders the nav menu unusable. Personally I find the stark red purple a turn-off, but that's personal and I suspect I'm not your target audience. Glancing at the front page I did catch a typo: How can you get involed? missing a v. Have fun Paul ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Best approach (new question)
Now I've looked at the samples and it seem it can't be done without
having some kind of text as the link and they want to use their own
font on the imgs. (I know... but they pay me and I do what they
want... almost)
So can the same effect as a javascript img swap possible using CSS
only?
At that point you use a unique set of images and css for each swap,
probably assigned by id with the behavior outlined in a class. I
haven't tested this, but I suspect you're looking for something like
this:
style type=text/css
#foo { background: url(/img/foo.gif) no-repeat 0 0; }
#bar { background: url(/img/bar.gif) no-repeat 0 0; }
a.rollover:link{ background-position: 0px 0px; }
a.rollover:visited { background-position: 0px 10px; }
a.rollover:hover { background-position: 0px 20px; }
a.rollover:active { background-position: 0px 30px; }
/style
a href=foo.html id=foo class=rolloverimg src=/img/clear.gif
height=10 width=20 alt=Foo //a
a href=bar.html id=bar class=rolloverimg src=/img/clear.gif
height=10 width=20 alt=Bar //a
I'm not sure if this is entirely kosher. Maybe there's something more
appropriate than a clear gif to make the link fill up some room? Would
it be clickable if you simply gave foo and bar a height and width with
display:block?
--
Ben Curtis
WebSciences International
http://www.websciences.org/
v: (310) 478-6648
f: (310) 235-2067
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Re: [WSG] Experimentations in XSLT
Hi Jonathan, Most XSLT users process data server-side and then send the result of the transformation to the client. This is a safer approach than sending XML and XSLT to the client. XSLT is a wonderful technology. A while back we did some XML and XSLT training for the Canadian government. For those that want a hands on approach to learning XSLT, here are a few labs. Lab 4 lets you practice XPath and Lab 5 lets you practice XSLT. Here is the link: http://belus.com/training/ Also, Jonathan, I had a look at your XSLT. You can optimize it a bit if you replace several xsl:if with xsl:for-each or xsl:template. Regards, -Vlad http://xstandard.com XStandard Development Team - Original Message - From: Jonathan T. Sage [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 1:43 PM Subject: [WSG] Experimentations in XSLT Good afternoon or insert more appropriate time of day Recently, after the pursuit of a site that does conform to XHTML 1.1 and CSS2, I became very interested in the XSL/XSLT language, since my site has a XML CMS back end already. I began to look at ways to cut out the PHP step. My experimentations have proved to be very interesting, with 2 caveats: 1.) Obviously 2 pass processing doesn't work. Catching PHP embedded in the source XML becomes impossible. At this time, I don't have a fix for this. 2.) Firefox (in fact all gecko based browsers) do not support my method of embedding HTML in XML... results are interesting, but expected. Opera doesn't like this method at all, and IE6 displays perfectly. Since this list is standards based, and I've yet to see any real writeup about XSLT and what it is capable of, I figured a would share what I found with all of you. More information about what I did is available here: http://jtsage.com/apathy/archives/2004/12/08/xslt-part-1/ and here: http://jtsage.com/apathy/archives/2004/12/09/xslt-part-2/ If anyone has any information on how to fix #2, I'd also love to hear it. Hope this proves to be a good read! ~j -- Jonathan T. Sage Theatrical Lighting / Set Designer Professional Web Design [HTTP://www.JTSage.com] [HTTP://design.JTSage.com] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Best approach (new question)
Now I've looked at the samples and it seem it can't be done without having some kind of text as the link and they want to use their own font on the imgs. (I know... but they pay me and I do what they want... almost) So can the same effect as a javascript img swap possible using CSS only? Thanks in advance Kim Kim- I've mocked up an example for you. http://www.aurora-il.org/testsite/problemsolving/hovertest.htm http://www.aurora-il.org/testsite/problemsolving/hovertest.css this uses the hover property on the DIV itself. There is a clear gif with an A wrapped around it to provide for the link itself. The images are set as background-image properties of the DIV itself. One catch. This won't work in IE because it doesn't support the hover property on the DIVs. However, if you you use the csshover.htc file, you can make IE support it. I don't recall where the csshover.htc is located on the web, but if you google it, I'm sure you'll find it. Regards, Ron ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Best approach (new question)
Now I've looked at the samples and it seem it can't be done without having some kind of text as the link and they want to use their own font on the imgs. (I know... but they pay me and I do what they want... almost) So can the same effect as a javascript img swap possible using CSS only? Thanks in advance Kim Kim- I updated my example for you to include the csshover.htc. It now works in IE as well as Opera and Gecko browsers. You can grab the htc file from my server, at this link: http://www.aurora-il.org/testsite/problemsolving/csshover.htc You probably will want to implement the suggestion from one of the other listmembers about using one image and just changing its position rather than swapping images as I've done. If I get the time, I'll update my example to include that as well. Regards, Ron ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Best approach (new question)
Hi all, I have a slightly related question, and hopefully asking it will not dissolve into something a list mom will have to stomp on... so, here goes... Just out of curiosity, why are some people turning javascript off? I have heard on lists that some see it as a security risk, but I have never heard of anyone's computer being compromised by js. Is it just an aversion to pop ups and window shake/resizing? Again, I'm not debating the use of js, just wondering why people would turn it off. TIA Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist mlinc.com Pringle, Ron wrote: Now I've looked at the samples and it seem it can't be done without having some kind of text as the link and they want to use their own font on the imgs. (I know... but they pay me and I do what they want... almost) So can the same effect as a javascript img swap possible using CSS only? Thanks in advance Kim Kim- I updated my example for you to include the csshover.htc. It now works in IE as well as Opera and Gecko browsers. You can grab the htc file from my server, at this link: http://www.aurora-il.org/testsite/problemsolving/csshover.htc You probably will want to implement the suggestion from one of the other listmembers about using one image and just changing its position rather than swapping images as I've done. If I get the time, I'll update my example to include that as well. Regards, Ron ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Experimentations in XSLT
Most XSLT users process data server-side and then send the result of the transformation to the client. This is a safer approach than sending XML and XSLT to the client. Yeah, this is absolutely right. The typical xml publishing flow looks something like this, [xml source (docbook/openoffice/xhtml)] feeds into [business logic xslt] which feeds into [web presentation logic xslt] or [print presentation logic xslt] or [pda presentation logic xslt] and then it's sent to the outside world. Typically this type of flow from one bit of xslt to the next is called a pipeline, and there's software to assist you in creating these and aggregating the results. You can construct pipelines in any language by pushing the output from one transformation into another, but these frameworks will cache each stage of the pipeline and skip the regeneration if the files haven't changed, and other features to ease development. Specifically, there's Apache Cocoon which has been in heavy use around the world for years. I've used it in a few commercial projects and it's one of those frameworks that makes the job so much easier. There's my ripoff of Cocoon in PHP called Phpilfer, http://holloway.co.nz/phpilfer which has some (in my opinion) important technical changes to make it faster than Cocoon (although less XML'y). Phpilfer isn't ready for production use yet but I'm putting out a site in it over christmas so that'll be a good test. Mostly, the benefit of XSLT is that you start with these media-independent source files that you can convert to web, print, voice, xbrl, rss, any format, and it's a well-tested tech that people are using every day. If you're a publishing house, or you have a lot of content on your website, then these highly structured media-independent source files are your gold. People should be more wary of producing source documents, spending weeks editing them, and then locking them up in a loosely structured format (like MSWord, PDF) that other software can't easily get into. XML publishing is about fixing all that. There's this mediocre presentation for the Wellington PHP user group a few years ago about XML publishing, http://holloway.co.nz/wellypug/publishing/ Jonathan T. Sage wrote: Since this list is standards based, and I've yet to see any real writeup about XSLT and what it is capable of, I figured a would share what I found with all of you. More information about what I did is available here: http://jtsage.com/apathy/archives/2004/12/08/xslt-part-1/ and here: http://jtsage.com/apathy/archives/2004/12/09/xslt-part-2/ 1) I think most people aren't sending XSLT to the browser. 2) The CDATA section should probably be just tags because it looks like XML to me. If you can't trust that your source is going to be valid XML then I guess you can use HTML Tidy on it. Generally there are some approaches in XSLT that are good, - Try to use many xsl:template matchs and xsl:apply-templates/ rather than matching the root node, writing a template, and copying in the bits you want. That way you be more discriminant about what's allowed through. - Try to use namespaces, rather than writing tags, even if it means creating your own. As you're writing html, set the default namespace to XHTML (or html 4.01, whatever). That way if you integrate with another feed of xml you can distinguish your html from the other stuff. Here's a good XSLT FAQ, maintained by my guru, Dave Pawson, http://dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect2/sect21.html .Matthew Cruickshank http://holloway.co.nz/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Experimentations in XSLT
What is the cms that you are trying? Is it mosxml? I've been looking into that one and would be interested in your opinion. I haven't gotten it to work but I think the product looks promising. Jonathan T. Sage wrote: Since this list is standards based, and I've yet to see any real writeup about XSLT and what it is capable of, I figured a would share what I found with all of you. More information about what I did is available here: http://jtsage.com/apathy/archives/2004/12/08/xslt-part-1/ and here: http://jtsage.com/apathy/archives/2004/12/09/xslt-part-2/ 1) I think most people aren't sending XSLT to the browser. 2) The CDATA section should probably be just tags because it looks like XML to me. If you can't trust that your source is going to be valid XML then I guess you can use HTML Tidy on it. Generally there are some approaches in XSLT that are good, - Try to use many xsl:template matchs and xsl:apply-templates/ rather than matching the root node, writing a template, and copying in the bits you want. That way you be more discriminant about what's allowed through. - Try to use namespaces, rather than writing tags, even if it means creating your own. As you're writing html, set the default namespace to XHTML (or html 4.01, whatever). That way if you integrate with another feed of xml you can distinguish your html from the other stuff. Here's a good XSLT FAQ, maintained by my guru, Dave Pawson, http://dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect2/sect21.html .Matthew Cruickshank http://holloway.co.nz/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** N.X+i nZv+hymjl.f.wq(b(,)azX)i
[WSG] Float Issue
Hi, the following layout url works locally in firefox, mozilla, ie 5 mac even. When uploaded to a server, the right column, secondary, is atop main. The isp is not to blame, the site was tested out of the subdomain so the scripts are not broken. This is not a .php question, the question is with the css. http://working.ckimedia.com/index.php CK __ Knowing is not enough, you must apply; willing is not enough, you must do. ---Bruce Lee ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Experimentations in XSLT
Hi Jonathan, On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 13:43:28 -0500, Jonathan T. Sage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If anyone has any information on how to fix #2, I'd also love to hear it. Hope this proves to be a good read! Try removing the CDATA delimeters adding the XHTML namespace to the BODYTEXT element: BODYTEXT xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; h1... -- Lindsay Evans http://lindsayevans.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] text-align problem.
How about display:blocking the anchors and then floating them to the right?
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:26:53 +1100, Joshua Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Morning people.
I'm having problems justifying some text in a simple manner, could anyone
help?
I want to change.
this:
-
By Email:
Administration: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Projects: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Services: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Nicholson: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Managing Director
-
into this:
-
By Email:
Administration: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Projects: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Services: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Nicholson:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Managing Director
-
(notice the aligned email address's in the second version )
I'm trying to do this without creating another DIV ( I seem to go crazy with
DIV's usually )
I've tried:
#content-right p a { text-align: right; }
and tried to create a span around the anchor tag and then
{ text-align: right } that
but they both seem to do nothing :(
If there is no other way than to create another div inside my #content-right
div, then I will concede!
Here is the page source: http://www.triplejosh.com/work/metro/contact.html
Here is the page CSS:
http://www.triplejosh.com/work/metro/stylesheetMetro.css
The page is validated in xHTML Transitional . but I think im going to start
using Strict as I will come across less problems in cross browser
compatibility, is that right?
cheers,
- Josh -
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Cheers,
Rob.
» http://zooibaai.nl
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
[WSG] question about multiple stylesheets
Hi everyone Could someone please enlighten me. I have a situation where I have 5 style sheets imported by a main style sheet (it was getting way too complicated so I decided to split of specific areas into their own stylesheet) In my main style sheet I have set my font in the body tag, e.g. 85% font family etc. My question is this - do the other style sheets set their fonts against this body tag so I can say another font is relative to that one or do I have to set it again? E.g. if I wanted sidebar text to be smaller in the stylesheet that sets the sidebar, would I say that the sidebar is say .9 ems and it would be .9ems of the 85% that is set in the body tag in the main stylesheet, or would it be independent of that and be .9ems of whatever the browser is set at. Thanks for your help. Cheers Helen *** Helen Rysavy Web Designer, Teaching Learning Development Charles Darwin University, Northern Territory 0909 Tel: 8946 7779 Mobile: 0403 290 842 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cdu.edu.au CRICOS Provider No: 00300K *** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] First Wellington WSG meeting
ok, so I'm so not a blogger! But my first attempt - a very brief rundown of the Wellington meeting - is here: http://discuss.webstandardsgroup.org/archives/18.htm It was a great meeting. We had close to 40 show up and there's a lot of interest in the group and getting it working well next year. Thanks to everyone who showed up, and to Terry Wood for his help and presentation! I'm looking forward to a lot of good things coming from this. Oh, and of course thanks to Russ and Peter and others here for the help and impetus to set things up in Wellington. Regards Mike Brown SIGNIFY LTD :: the logic behind ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site Critique - do your worst...
i agree that using the same color for the links and the headlines is confusing ( i tried to click on the headline when i saw the read more link) when clicking on a link in the drop-down menu for the first time the links slide a bit (a few pixels) to left; looks like you have to re-look your css for :hover and :visited personally i do not like drop down menus. but this is very subjective one... the js used for resizing text is, hm.., acting strange; when you first choose to enlarge the font and then choose to do the oposite, the -a changes the font from +1 to -1, not to 0; or is it supposed to work that way ? i strangely like the color scheme: purple and red... At 19:19 2004-12-09, you wrote: ...I can take it because I value the opions of users of this list :) So do your best (/worst) *awkward grimace* Hello again all, Been beavering away on a new site: http://www.sammyco.co.uk/acttrwebpre/PRE%20VALIDATION.htm . --- Czes³aw Liebert http://www.78and85.com/ tel. (+48) (0) 504 425 892 mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
