Re: [xHarbour-developers] Strange compiler behavior using dot
-Messaggio Originale- Da: Luiz Rafael Culik Guimaraes l...@xharbour.com.br A: Enrico Maria Giordano e.m.giord...@emagsoftware.it; xHarbour Developers Mailing List xharbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Data invio: mercoledì 25 novembre 2009 23.54 Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Strange compiler behavior using dot Error E2209 test.c 16: Unable to open include file 'OTEST.xns' Hi Enrico when using an dot, you are trying to reference an function on an name space on left of the dot The actual error was: Error E2209 test.c 16: Unable to open include file 'CVAR.xns' Are you saying that this error message is expected? Isn't it at least not clear and misleading? EMG -- EMAG Software Homepage: http://www.emagsoftware.it The EMG's ZX-Spectrum Page: http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum The Best of Spectrum Games: http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg The EMG Music page: http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
[xHarbour-developers] RegExpression to Find Variables
Hi
Does any one know an good reg expression to locate variables
I´ve come to this bellow, but o need to specify the size to found
(^[vV])[A-Za-z0-9]{3}
Regards
Luiz
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
___
xHarbour-developers mailing list
xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
[xHarbour-developers] RDD: ADT - ADSADT
Hi, current ADS RDD is registered using names: ADS, ADT, ADSCDX, ADSNTX, ADSVFP. RDD SYSNAME method (i.e., RDDNAME()) can return one of the following values: ADSADT, ADSCDX, ADSNTX, ADSVFP. Original C level ADS defines for different database types are: ADS_CDX, ADS_NTX, ADS_VFP, ADT_ADT. I propose to rename RDD from ADT to ADSADT, thus making both correct RDDNAME() return value and to be compatible with naming scheme of another ADS RDDs. Any objections? Regards, Mindaugas -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
Re: [xHarbour-developers] RDD: ADT - ADSADT
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote: current ADS RDD is registered using names: ADS, ADT, ADSCDX, ADSNTX, ... Sorry, wrong mailing list. Regards, Mindaugas -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
Re: [xHarbour-developers] RDD: ADT - ADSADT
Mindaugas: I'm not sure why you're making the suggestion. Right now, the original ADS is an all-inclusive rdd that lets you switch the file type to cdx, ntx, etc. in different workareas. The addition of specific sub-rdds of ADSCDX etc. came years later. I, and I imagine a lot of other people who started using rddads early on, never had a need to explicitly use those other rdds by name. Are you suggesting that we should now have to re-write our apps by converting ADS to ADSADT? But wait: IIRC (I'm not sure), ADSCDX is the DEFAULT for ADS, so converting it to ADT doesn't really make sense, does it? If you're suggesting a change that would require people to change code that's been growing for 9 years, there needs to be a stronger reason to force the change than just compatibility with other rdds, IMHO. Or am I missing something? -- Brian Hays -Original Message- From: Mindaugas Kavaliauskas [mailto:dbto...@dbtopas.lt] Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 4:55 PM To: Xharbour-Developers List Subject: [xHarbour-developers] RDD: ADT - ADSADT Hi, current ADS RDD is registered using names: ADS, ADT, ADSCDX, ADSNTX, ADSVFP. RDD SYSNAME method (i.e., RDDNAME()) can return one of the following values: ADSADT, ADSCDX, ADSNTX, ADSVFP. Original C level ADS defines for different database types are: ADS_CDX, ADS_NTX, ADS_VFP, ADT_ADT. I propose to rename RDD from ADT to ADSADT, thus making both correct RDDNAME() return value and to be compatible with naming scheme of another ADS RDDs. Any objections? Regards, Mindaugas --- --- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.426 / Virus Database: 270.14.67/2506 - Release Date: 11/26/09 09:10:00 -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
Re: [xHarbour-developers] RDD: ADT - ADSADT
Mindaugas: If you intended it for the Harbour project, please keep this xHarbour group and/or me in the conversation. I have continued to work with Viktor and Przemek to keep rddads coordinated as much as possible in both projects. It may be worthwhile to forward my concerns to the other project too, or please inform me if I'm incorrect on any points. Thanks, -- Brian Hays -Original Message- From: Mindaugas Kavaliauskas [mailto:dbto...@dbtopas.lt] Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 6:29 PM To: Xharbour-Developers List Subject: Re: [xHarbour-developers] RDD: ADT - ADSADT Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote: current ADS RDD is registered using names: ADS, ADT, ADSCDX, ADSNTX, ... Sorry, wrong mailing list. Regards, Mindaugas --- --- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.426 / Virus Database: 270.14.67/2506 - Release Date: 11/26/09 09:10:00 -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
Re: [xHarbour-developers] RDD: ADT - ADSADT
Hi, bhays wrote: I'm not sure why you're making the suggestion. Right now, the original ADS is an all-inclusive rdd that lets you switch the file type to cdx, ntx, etc. in different workareas. The addition of specific sub-rdds of ADSCDX etc. came years later. I, and I imagine a lot of other people who started using rddads early on, never had a need to explicitly use those other rdds by name. Are you suggesting that we should now have to re-write our apps by converting ADS to ADSADT? No, I want to make you convert from: RDDSETDEFAULT(ADT) to RDDSETDEFAULT(ADSADT) I'm also talking about Harbour code, not sure that names has xHarbour's ADS RDD. But, it is not nice to have: DBUSEAREA(.T., ADT, ...) ? RDDNAME() // prints ADSADT, not ADT! So, my suggestion is to convert ADT to ADSADT. ADS RDD remains unchanged. Regards, Mindaugas -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july ___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
