[xmail] esmtp time out - not yet solved
Hello Davide, unfortunately after the update to 1.16pre01 and reactivating the CheckMailerDomain-feature our customers are crying again, that they get the esmtp timeout. disabling CheckMailerDomain solves the problem for the moment, but shouldn't this be fixed with 1.16pre01? >From looking at your code (SMTPUtils.cpp ll 2000-2020) I can see that you have changed the order of the checks: First the MX-Check, then - if MX-Check fails - the A-Check. Is it possible, that the MX-Check itself causes the timeout? We are running bind as nameserver for these domains on the same machine, so there should not be such a timeout. Do you have any idea? Tracing it with a packet sniffer gives the same results as before: It hangs after MAIL FROM is issued by the client. -- Mit freundlichem Gruß Henrik Steffen Geschäftsführer top concepts Internetmarketing GmbH Am Steinkamp 7 - D-21684 Stade - Germany http://www.topconcepts.com Tel. +49 4141 991230 mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax. +49 4141 991233 24h-Support Hotline: +49 1908 34697 (EUR 1.86/Min,topc) Ihr SMS-Gateway: JETZT NEU unter: http://sms.city-map.de System-Partner gesucht: http://www.franchise.city-map.de Handelsregister: AG Stade HRB 5811 - UstId: DE 213645563 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] error loading spool file
What does this mean? [PeekTime] 1055458949 : Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:02:29 -0400 << ErrCode = -56 ErrString = Invalid spool file Unable to load spool file "\\?\C:\mailroot\spool\20\21\mess\1055458975843.592.linky" SMTP-Error = "554 Error loading spool file" >> and the spool file: 192.168.1.2:3186;192.168.1.3:25;Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:02:29 -0400 sedivy.com S62E6 MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RCPT TO: <> Received: from sedivy.com (192.168.1.2:3186) by sedivy.com (192.168.1.3:25) with [XMail 1.15 (Win32/Ix86) ESMTP Server] id for from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:02:29 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:01:36 -0400 From: Ladislav Sedivy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Matthew John Bucha References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [...] Running 1.15 on Win2k Thanks, Lac - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
At 18:15 6/12/2003, Kirk Friggstad wrote: >For another example (just discovered this today at >http://www.mynetwatchman.com/kb/security/ports/17/137.htm - scroll down to >the "False Positives" section at the end) - on a Windows web server, if >Netbios is bound to the public IP address of the server, IIS will attempt to >do a direct Netbios query back to the client if RDNS fails. This causes (a) >unnecessary network traffic and (b) false alarms on firewalls, etc. Which >reminds me - I need to check on my Netbios bindings on my Windows boxes... This is a well-known issue in the security community. It's also one of the reasons why NetBIOS ports are so often blocked at border routers...:) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
I'm not so sure that turning off RDNS for dial-up/dynamic is a good idea. RDNS checks aren't just used by SMTP relay blockers. For example: until a few years ago, it was illegal in the United States for a company to "export" high encryption (that's a whole other story, though), so download sites for high encryption products in the U.S. had to use RDNS checks to confirm that the person downloading was from the U.S. or Canada. (The reason I remember this so well is that the non-profit ISP that I volunteered with (and had my dial-up access through) had problems with RDNS, and so I was unable to download encryption products (at that point in time, 128-bit Netscape Navigator - gads, that was a while ago) until we got the RDNS fixed.) For another example (just discovered this today at http://www.mynetwatchman.com/kb/security/ports/17/137.htm - scroll down to the "False Positives" section at the end) - on a Windows web server, if Netbios is bound to the public IP address of the server, IIS will attempt to do a direct Netbios query back to the client if RDNS fails. This causes (a) unnecessary network traffic and (b) false alarms on firewalls, etc. Which reminds me - I need to check on my Netbios bindings on my Windows boxes... In short - RDNS ain't just for servers. Of course, that's just my 2 cents - your mileage may vary. Kirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 3:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users At 17:16 6/12/2003, Michael Harrington wrote: >Honestly, can you blame AOL for doing this? I can't even count how much >SPAM gets thrown at our system from people using their cable or DSL lines. No, I can't blame them for wanting to stop some of the spam. But one of the best solutions I've seen proposed to date has nothing to do with running regex's on DNS names. It's very simple, and very cost effective. Have the ISPs who allocate IP pools for dynamic assignment or for dialup users remove the PTR records for those addresses, and let mail servers do RDNS checks. This serves three purposes: 1) It gives a simple, quick, and reasonably accurate measure of whether an IP address is intended to be a server (no PTR record = no server) 2) It is nearly costless to implement on both sides (removing PTR records is a one-time operation, and can be done quickly; and setting up an RDNS check for incoming connections should be a simple matter in most mail server software - or even on a firewall or portal before it gets to the mail server). 3) It helps prevent users of dynamic or dialup IP addresses from running server packages in contravention of their ISP's AUP and contract. I know that my own ISP does this - I had to explicitly ask for RDNS to be set up on my IP block (I have a 16 address subnet allocated from my ISP). And several other ISPs in the area also do this (set up RDNS only on request, and often charge an additional monthly fee for the service). >The number of messages you stop vs. the number of legitimate email messages >makes the concept seem worth it to me. I'm glad I don't have AOL or >Hotmails systems. They could probably cut their systems in half if it >weren't for the junk mail that they're having to process. The same thing could be said from the other side. Do you have any idea how many spam mails I could block from my server by rejecting anything with "aol.com" or "hotmail.com" in the envelope sender? And, honestly, for my own mail server here, I could do that with near 0% "casualties" to legitimate mail. But would that be ethical as a postmaster to do? I don't think so - just as I don't really think that their solution is ethical. Sure, it's their network, and they can make the rules they want, but... >Spam may not realistically cost end users that much money, but it definatly >costs ISPs money in bandwidth and storage for all that junk. Well, I'm a *small* operation - my mail server handles traffic for three domains, containing a total of about 30 users. My average throughput is around 2000 messages a day. However, out of that 2000 messages, nearly 70% is spam. But I've not found it necessary to result to regex operations on DNS names. Actually, I should say that nearly 70% *was* spam - after having spent a couple of weeks playing with various DNSBLs and assessing their collateral damage, and playing with RDNS checks and assessing the damage there, I've reduced the spam to under 25% of the daily flow - and I'm expecting to reduce it further by tuning the DNSBLs. Granted that 25% of the total traffic is still a whale of a lot of messages, but it's a lot better than 70%. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the b
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
At 17:16 6/12/2003, Michael Harrington wrote: >Honestly, can you blame AOL for doing this? I can't even count how much >SPAM gets thrown at our system from people using their cable or DSL lines. No, I can't blame them for wanting to stop some of the spam. But one of the best solutions I've seen proposed to date has nothing to do with running regex's on DNS names. It's very simple, and very cost effective. Have the ISPs who allocate IP pools for dynamic assignment or for dialup users remove the PTR records for those addresses, and let mail servers do RDNS checks. This serves three purposes: 1) It gives a simple, quick, and reasonably accurate measure of whether an IP address is intended to be a server (no PTR record = no server) 2) It is nearly costless to implement on both sides (removing PTR records is a one-time operation, and can be done quickly; and setting up an RDNS check for incoming connections should be a simple matter in most mail server software - or even on a firewall or portal before it gets to the mail server). 3) It helps prevent users of dynamic or dialup IP addresses from running server packages in contravention of their ISP's AUP and contract. I know that my own ISP does this - I had to explicitly ask for RDNS to be set up on my IP block (I have a 16 address subnet allocated from my ISP). And several other ISPs in the area also do this (set up RDNS only on request, and often charge an additional monthly fee for the service). >The number of messages you stop vs. the number of legitimate email messages >makes the concept seem worth it to me. I'm glad I don't have AOL or >Hotmails systems. They could probably cut their systems in half if it >weren't for the junk mail that they're having to process. The same thing could be said from the other side. Do you have any idea how many spam mails I could block from my server by rejecting anything with "aol.com" or "hotmail.com" in the envelope sender? And, honestly, for my own mail server here, I could do that with near 0% "casualties" to legitimate mail. But would that be ethical as a postmaster to do? I don't think so - just as I don't really think that their solution is ethical. Sure, it's their network, and they can make the rules they want, but... >Spam may not realistically cost end users that much money, but it definatly >costs ISPs money in bandwidth and storage for all that junk. Well, I'm a *small* operation - my mail server handles traffic for three domains, containing a total of about 30 users. My average throughput is around 2000 messages a day. However, out of that 2000 messages, nearly 70% is spam. But I've not found it necessary to result to regex operations on DNS names. Actually, I should say that nearly 70% *was* spam - after having spent a couple of weeks playing with various DNSBLs and assessing their collateral damage, and playing with RDNS checks and assessing the damage there, I've reduced the spam to under 25% of the daily flow - and I'm expecting to reduce it further by tuning the DNSBLs. Granted that 25% of the total traffic is still a whale of a lot of messages, but it's a lot better than 70%. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Minor "bug"
Sorry for the confusion: It's not a specific message, it's the entire directory or file itself becoming inaccessable due to a corrupted file system. It didn't create any Dr. Watson dump files otherwise I would send them to you, but here are the messages reported in the system log but I don't know if they'll help: Application popup: XMail.exe - Application Error : The instruction at "0x77fcb3f5" referenced memory at "0xc000". The memory could not be "written". Application popup: XMail.exe - Application Error : The instruction at "0x77fcb3f5" referenced memory at "0xc000". The memory could not be "written". Application popup: XMail.exe - Application Error : The instruction at "0x77fcb850" referenced memory at "0xc000". The memory could not be "written". Application popup: XMail.exe - Application Error : The instruction at "0x77fcb3f5" referenced memory at "0xc000". The memory could not be "written". Application popup: XMail.exe - Application Error : The instruction at "0x77fcb3f5" referenced memory at "0xc000". The memory could not be "written". Application popup: XMail.exe - Application Error : The instruction at "0x77fcc419" referenced memory at "0xc000". The memory could not be "written". Like I said, it's not that big of a deal, just thought you might want to know. -Mike - Original Message - From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:06 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Minor "bug" > > On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Michael Harrington wrote: > > > Hey Davide, > > > > I know this is rather minor, but I have noticed that if a directory > > containing a user's mailbox becomes corrupted or an individual message > > file becomes corrupted (error in the file system) under the NT/2K build > > and XMail tries to access that file or folder, the entire service > > crashes. I understand this isn't critical, but just thought you might > > want to know. > > Could you post the message that gave problems ? > > > - Davide > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
Honestly, can you blame AOL for doing this? I can't even count how much SPAM gets thrown at our system from people using their cable or DSL lines. The number of messages you stop vs. the number of legitimate email messages makes the concept seem worth it to me. I'm glad I don't have AOL or Hotmails systems. They could probably cut their systems in half if it weren't for the junk mail that they're having to process. Let's face it ... spam is an epidimic and there's no such thing as a "good" or "perfect" solution. Spam may not realistically cost end users that much money, but it definatly costs ISPs money in bandwidth and storage for all that junk. If you're small it doesn't amount to much, but if you're the size of AOL and having to store an extra 10 million+ messages a day plus the bandwidth for receiving them and then the bandwidth of sending it to your users when they check their email... the costs add up quick. -Mike - Original Message - From: "Charles Frolick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:02 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users > > One of the people invloved in the discussion on the other list works for > AOL, and he confirmed it is purely a regex against the PTR record > looking for keywords that indicate dial/dsl/cable users. E.g. if it > contains cm, dsl, pool, dial, etc. anywhere from the third level up > (127.0.0.1.dsl-city.domain.tld, but not blah.mydsl.tld) they will deny > it. > > Thanks, > Chuck Frolick > ArgoNet, Inc. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of William > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 3:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users > > > > > Odds are that AOL has subscribed to a DNSBL that lists dynamic IP > addresses, and your IP address is showing up in there. This means that > *nothing* you can do on your end will fix this - your only hope is > getting > your ISP to assign you an address which is not listed in whichever DNSBL > that AOL is using. > > There is at least one dialup.abuse.net (I believe) RBL subscription and > they > must be using it or another. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Minor "bug"
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Michael Harrington wrote: > Hey Davide, > > I know this is rather minor, but I have noticed that if a directory > containing a user's mailbox becomes corrupted or an individual message > file becomes corrupted (error in the file system) under the NT/2K build > and XMail tries to access that file or folder, the entire service > crashes. I understand this isn't critical, but just thought you might > want to know. Could you post the message that gave problems ? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: 550 Error Message
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Riaz wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > Today one of my clients received this error message: > > "550 forwarding blocked, read new mail, add 63.118.73.10 to forwarding or > use smtp authentication" > > Does anyone recognize this? I don't believe this is an XMAIL error message. No, it's not XMail. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
One of the people invloved in the discussion on the other list works for AOL, and he confirmed it is purely a regex against the PTR record looking for keywords that indicate dial/dsl/cable users. E.g. if it contains cm, dsl, pool, dial, etc. anywhere from the third level up (127.0.0.1.dsl-city.domain.tld, but not blah.mydsl.tld) they will deny it. Thanks, Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 3:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users > Odds are that AOL has subscribed to a DNSBL that lists dynamic IP addresses, and your IP address is showing up in there. This means that *nothing* you can do on your end will fix this - your only hope is getting your ISP to assign you an address which is not listed in whichever DNSBL that AOL is using. There is at least one dialup.abuse.net (I believe) RBL subscription and they must be using it or another. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Minor "bug"
Hey Davide, I know this is rather minor, but I have noticed that if a directory containing a user's mailbox becomes corrupted or an individual message file becomes corrupted (error in the file system) under the NT/2K build and XMail tries to access that file or folder, the entire service crashes. I understand this isn't critical, but just thought you might want to know. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
> Odds are that AOL has subscribed to a DNSBL that lists dynamic IP addresses, and your IP address is showing up in there. This means that *nothing* you can do on your end will fix this - your only hope is getting your ISP to assign you an address which is not listed in whichever DNSBL that AOL is using. There is at least one dialup.abuse.net (I believe) RBL subscription and they must be using it or another. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] 550 Error Message
Hi Guys, Today one of my clients received this error message: "550 forwarding blocked, read new mail, add 63.118.73.10 to forwarding or use smtp authentication" Does anyone recognize this? I don't believe this is an XMAIL error message. Thanks. Riaz.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
Yes I was missing the @ sign in front of my isp's mail server. It now
works.
Thanks
- Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
Date: 12/06/03 10:30
Here's mine:
"aol.com"[tab]"@mail.myisp.com"
"cs.com"[tab]"@mail.myisp.com"
"netscape.com"[tab]"@mail.myisp.com"
"netscape.net"[tab]"@mail.myisp.com"
"wmconnect.com"[tab]"@mail.myisp.com"
[newline]
- Original Message -
From: "webmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:10 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
>
>how do i go about settting that up?
>In smtpgw.tab I did "aol.com" {tab} "cableone.net" and also @cableone.net
>and mailcableone.net and none worked?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
>Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:02 PM
>To: Xmail
>Subject: [xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
>
>
>
>On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, webmaster wrote:
>
>>
>>AOL seems to have put forth effort to stop spam and its causing me a
>slight
>>headache.
>>At home I am on cable and it is a dynamic ip but changes rare (like 6
>months
>>or more before I get a new ip) and at work I have cable and static. Yet
>AOL
>>insists on not relayinh my emails sent to legit aol users.
>>
>>[HERE IS THE PROBLEM]
>>
>>[<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554- The IP address you
>are
>>using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential)
>>554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from
this
>>IP
>>554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from its list of
>dynamic
>>554- (residential) IP addresses. For additional information, please
visit
>>554 http://postmaster.info.aol.com.[2]]
>
>They're likely using some sort of dialup list and your IP fall inside.
>Can't you use your cable provider MTA and relay for XMail ?
>
>
>
>- Davide
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message sent using Webmail from thebatchfile.com
--- Links ---
1 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 http://postmaster.info.aol.com./
3 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
4 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
5 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
7 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
8 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
Here's mine:
"aol.com"[tab]"@mail.myisp.com"
"cs.com"[tab]"@mail.myisp.com"
"netscape.com"[tab]"@mail.myisp.com"
"netscape.net"[tab]"@mail.myisp.com"
"wmconnect.com"[tab]"@mail.myisp.com"
[newline]
- Original Message -
From: "webmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:10 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
>
> how do i go about settting that up?
> In smtpgw.tab I did "aol.com" {tab} "cableone.net" and also @cableone.net
> and mailcableone.net and none worked?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:02 PM
> To: Xmail
> Subject: [xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
>
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, webmaster wrote:
>
> >
> > AOL seems to have put forth effort to stop spam and its causing me a
> slight
> > headache.
> > At home I am on cable and it is a dynamic ip but changes rare (like 6
> months
> > or more before I get a new ip) and at work I have cable and static. Yet
> AOL
> > insists on not relayinh my emails sent to legit aol users.
> >
> > [HERE IS THE PROBLEM]
> >
> > [<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554- The IP address you
> are
> > using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential)
> > 554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from
this
> > IP
> > 554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from its list of
> dynamic
> > 554- (residential) IP addresses. For additional information, please
visit
> > 554 http://postmaster.info.aol.com.]
>
> They're likely using some sort of dialup list and your IP fall inside.
> Can't you use your cable provider MTA and relay for XMail ?
>
>
>
> - Davide
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
Setup xmail to relay @aol.com mail through your cable isp mail server or through your xmail server at work using smtpfwd.tab. Or use DefaultSMTPGateways in server.tab to send all your mail to one of the above servers. Bill >-- >From: webmaster[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:59 AM >To:Xmail >Subject: [xmail] how can I send to AOL users > > >AOL seems to have put forth effort to stop spam and its causing me a slight >headache. >At home I am on cable and it is a dynamic ip but changes rare (like 6 months >or more before I get a new ip) and at work I have cable and static. Yet AOL >insists on not relayinh my emails sent to legit aol users. > >[HERE IS THE PROBLEM] > >[<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554- The IP address you are >using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential) >554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from this >IP >554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from its list of dynamic >554- (residential) IP addresses. For additional information, please visit >554 http://postmaster.info.aol.com.] > > >[<01>] Error sending message [1398506025741.1868.tbf02] from >[thebatchfile.com]. > >ID: >Mail From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Rcpt To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Server: [64.12.138.57] > > >[<02>] The reason of the delivery failure was: > >554- The IP address you are using to connect to AOL is a dynamic >(residential) >554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from this >IP >554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from its list of dynamic >554- (residential) IP addresses. For additional information, please visit >554 http://postmaster.info.aol.com. > > >I have tried to mess with the smptgw.tab but either I dont knwo what im >doing or it just didnt work. > >Any Suggetions? > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
I checked and I am not on the DNSBL list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users At 13:59 6/12/2003, webmaster wrote: >[<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554- The IP address you are >using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential) >554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from this >IP >554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from its list of dynamic >554- (residential) IP addresses. For additional information, please visit >554 http://postmaster.info.aol.com.] Odds are that AOL has subscribed to a DNSBL that lists dynamic IP addresses, and your IP address is showing up in there. This means that *nothing* you can do on your end will fix this - your only hope is getting your ISP to assign you an address which is not listed in whichever DNSBL that AOL is using. You can check your IP address against the major DNSBL lists at http://relays.osirusoft.com/cgi-bin/rbcheck.cgi?addr=200.100.200.100 replacing 200.100.200.100 with your actual IP address. As far as getting your ISP to assign you an address which isn't listed - well, if you have a contract with them which specifies that you are allowed to run servers, they should be able to assist you. Otherwise, you probably aren't going to have much luck. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
how do i go about settting that up?
In smtpgw.tab I did "aol.com" {tab} "cableone.net" and also @cableone.net
and mailcableone.net and none worked?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:02 PM
To: Xmail
Subject: [xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, webmaster wrote:
>
> AOL seems to have put forth effort to stop spam and its causing me a
slight
> headache.
> At home I am on cable and it is a dynamic ip but changes rare (like 6
months
> or more before I get a new ip) and at work I have cable and static. Yet
AOL
> insists on not relayinh my emails sent to legit aol users.
>
> [HERE IS THE PROBLEM]
>
> [<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554- The IP address you
are
> using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential)
> 554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from this
> IP
> 554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from its list of
dynamic
> 554- (residential) IP addresses. For additional information, please visit
> 554 http://postmaster.info.aol.com.]
They're likely using some sort of dialup list and your IP fall inside.
Can't you use your cable provider MTA and relay for XMail ?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
Oh, man! Been reading the thread from hell over this on another list. You have to get your ISP to change your PTR to not look like it belongs to any sort of cable/dial/dsl connection. They are scanning the PTR record and claiming that there is no reason for cable/dial/dsl users to ever directly connect to one of their servers. Thanks, Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of webmaster Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:00 PM To: Xmail Subject: [xmail] how can I send to AOL users AOL seems to have put forth effort to stop spam and its causing me a slight headache. At home I am on cable and it is a dynamic ip but changes rare (like 6 months or more before I get a new ip) and at work I have cable and static. Yet AOL insists on not relayinh my emails sent to legit aol users. [HERE IS THE PROBLEM] [<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554- The IP address you are using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential) 554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from this IP 554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from its list of dynamic 554- (residential) IP addresses. For additional information, please visit 554 http://postmaster.info.aol.com.] [<01>] Error sending message [1398506025741.1868.tbf02] from [thebatchfile.com]. ID: Mail From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rcpt To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Server: [64.12.138.57] [<02>] The reason of the delivery failure was: 554- The IP address you are using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential) 554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from this IP 554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from its list of dynamic 554- (residential) IP addresses. For additional information, please visit 554 http://postmaster.info.aol.com. I have tried to mess with the smptgw.tab but either I dont knwo what im doing or it just didnt work. Any Suggetions? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
At 13:59 6/12/2003, webmaster wrote: >[<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554- The IP address you are >using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential) >554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from this >IP >554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from its list of dynamic >554- (residential) IP addresses. For additional information, please visit >554 http://postmaster.info.aol.com.] Odds are that AOL has subscribed to a DNSBL that lists dynamic IP addresses, and your IP address is showing up in there. This means that *nothing* you can do on your end will fix this - your only hope is getting your ISP to assign you an address which is not listed in whichever DNSBL that AOL is using. You can check your IP address against the major DNSBL lists at http://relays.osirusoft.com/cgi-bin/rbcheck.cgi?addr=200.100.200.100 replacing 200.100.200.100 with your actual IP address. As far as getting your ISP to assign you an address which isn't listed - well, if you have a contract with them which specifies that you are allowed to run servers, they should be able to assist you. Otherwise, you probably aren't going to have much luck. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, webmaster wrote: > > AOL seems to have put forth effort to stop spam and its causing me a slight > headache. > At home I am on cable and it is a dynamic ip but changes rare (like 6 months > or more before I get a new ip) and at work I have cable and static. Yet AOL > insists on not relayinh my emails sent to legit aol users. > > [HERE IS THE PROBLEM] > > [<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554- The IP address you are > using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential) > 554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from this > IP > 554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from its list of dynamic > 554- (residential) IP addresses. For additional information, please visit > 554 http://postmaster.info.aol.com.] They're likely using some sort of dialup list and your IP fall inside. Can't you use your cable provider MTA and relay for XMail ? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] how can I send to AOL users
AOL seems to have put forth effort to stop spam and its causing me a slight headache. At home I am on cable and it is a dynamic ip but changes rare (like 6 months or more before I get a new ip) and at work I have cable and static. Yet AOL insists on not relayinh my emails sent to legit aol users. [HERE IS THE PROBLEM] [<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554- The IP address you are using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential) 554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from this IP 554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from its list of dynamic 554- (residential) IP addresses. For additional information, please visit 554 http://postmaster.info.aol.com.] [<01>] Error sending message [1398506025741.1868.tbf02] from [thebatchfile.com]. ID: Mail From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rcpt To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Server: [64.12.138.57] [<02>] The reason of the delivery failure was: 554- The IP address you are using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential) 554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from this IP 554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from its list of dynamic 554- (residential) IP addresses. For additional information, please visit 554 http://postmaster.info.aol.com. I have tried to mess with the smptgw.tab but either I dont knwo what im doing or it just didnt work. Any Suggetions? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail performance tuning
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, David Stebbings wrote: > > Yep, using Campaign enterprise as the feeder (on win2k) going to xmail = > (on win2k) and relaying to another smtp server (IIS' SMTP on win2k) > > Thats not doing any processing on the emails but I reckon any processing = > overhead would be minor compared to IO issues. > > For the record microsoft IIS SMTP server is much the same performance. You can't test like this. The receiving SMTP serve must be one order of magnitude faster than the one you're testing otherwise the limit might be the receiving part (supposing that the sending one is fast enough). We used to do those tests against a dual PIII 1GHz with dual ethernet epro100. On one eth was hooked the feeder, that was a quad Xeon 1GHz running an ultra-fast MT SMTP client and on the other side the was a so called SMTP black-hole able to receive 1.2 million messages per hour. Also, log must be disabled when you are testing those kind of performances since different MTA have different logging methods. IIS SMTP used to crash after 2 hour of load. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail performance tuning
Yep, using Campaign enterprise as the feeder (on win2k) going to xmail = (on win2k) and relaying to another smtp server (IIS' SMTP on win2k) Thats not doing any processing on the emails but I reckon any processing = overhead would be minor compared to IO issues. For the record microsoft IIS SMTP server is much the same performance. David > -Original Message- > From: Alex Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 June 2003 16:40 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail performance tuning >=20 >=20 >=20 > So the amount of threads makes no difference? Might as well not have > then specified in the registry. >=20 > Is that 120,000 on a windows system? >=20 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of David Stebbings > Sent: 12 June 2003 16:28 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail performance tuning >=20 >=20 >=20 > I've got 120,000 an hour throughput on Xmail using it as an=20 > SMTP relay =3D > on a 100Mb switched network with a single thread going into it. >=20 > If you're getting any less than that then I'd say it was probably =3D > bandwidth limited. >=20 > DAvid >=20 > > -Original Message- > > From: Alex Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 12 June 2003 16:26 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [xmail] Xmail performance tuning > >=3D20 > >=3D20 > >=3D20 > > Hi, > > if you are running Xmail on a good machine, such as a P4 with > 1gig=20 > >ram, what can I set to get emails to send quicker? I am running =20 > >Windows 2003. No, I can not use Linux. =3D20 > > I thought maybe putting up the number of SMTP threads. Any=3D20 > > idea how far > > I could put this up to and if it would make a difference to sending > > emails out to the internet? > >=3D20 > > Thanks, > > Alex > >=3D20 > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >=3D20 > >=3D20 > > __ > > __ > > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The > > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on=20 > a proactive > > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the=20 > globe, visit: > > http://www.star.net.uk > > __ > > __ > >=3D20 > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe=20 > xmail" in the > body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general=20 > help: send the > line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >=20 >=20 > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >=20 >=20 > __ > __ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > __ > __ >=20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail performance tuning
So the amount of threads makes no difference? Might as well not have then specified in the registry. Is that 120,000 on a windows system? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Stebbings Sent: 12 June 2003 16:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail performance tuning I've got 120,000 an hour throughput on Xmail using it as an SMTP relay = on a 100Mb switched network with a single thread going into it. If you're getting any less than that then I'd say it was probably = bandwidth limited. DAvid > -Original Message- > From: Alex Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 June 2003 16:26 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] Xmail performance tuning >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi, > if you are running Xmail on a good machine, such as a P4 with 1gig >ram, what can I set to get emails to send quicker? I am running >Windows 2003. No, I can not use Linux. =20 > I thought maybe putting up the number of SMTP threads. Any=20 > idea how far > I could put this up to and if it would make a difference to sending > emails out to the internet? >=20 > Thanks, > Alex >=20 > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >=20 >=20 > __ > __ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > __ > __ >=20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail performance tuning
I've got 120,000 an hour throughput on Xmail using it as an SMTP relay = on a 100Mb switched network with a single thread going into it. If you're getting any less than that then I'd say it was probably = bandwidth limited. DAvid > -Original Message- > From: Alex Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 June 2003 16:26 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] Xmail performance tuning >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi, > if you are running Xmail on a good machine, such as a P4 with > 1gig ram, what can I set to get emails to send quicker? I am running > Windows 2003. No, I can not use Linux. >=20 > I thought maybe putting up the number of SMTP threads. Any=20 > idea how far > I could put this up to and if it would make a difference to sending > emails out to the internet? >=20 > Thanks, > Alex >=20 > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >=20 >=20 > __ > __ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > __ > __ >=20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Xmail performance tuning
Hi, if you are running Xmail on a good machine, such as a P4 with 1gig ram, what can I set to get emails to send quicker? I am running Windows 2003. No, I can not use Linux. I thought maybe putting up the number of SMTP threads. Any idea how far I could put this up to and if it would make a difference to sending emails out to the internet? Thanks, Alex - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Bypassing RDNS check for specific addresses?
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Tracy wrote: > At 10:50 6/12/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > Is there a way to cause XMail to "whitelist" an IP address or address block > > > from MAPS/RDNS checking? I've got someone who runs a private mailing list > > > on their server, but doesn't have reverse DNS set up (actually, they did, > > > but their ISP messed it up). Is there a way I can tell XMail to just let > > > their server through without worrying about MAPS and/or RDNS? > > > >Nope. Let him run XMail and let him setup SMTP auth for outbound messages > >in XMail :) > > I tried...:) But he has this fixation with MDaemon...:) I'll tell him he > has to get his ISP to fix his RDNS. Thanks... Maybe it's the server that XMail does not like, not the IP :) Getting a PTR record is always good if you run a mail server. You're not the only one using RDNS checks out there. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Bypassing RDNS check for specific addresses?
At 10:50 6/12/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > Is there a way to cause XMail to "whitelist" an IP address or address block > > from MAPS/RDNS checking? I've got someone who runs a private mailing list > > on their server, but doesn't have reverse DNS set up (actually, they did, > > but their ISP messed it up). Is there a way I can tell XMail to just let > > their server through without worrying about MAPS and/or RDNS? > >Nope. Let him run XMail and let him setup SMTP auth for outbound messages >in XMail :) I tried...:) But he has this fixation with MDaemon...:) I'll tell him he has to get his ISP to fix his RDNS. Thanks... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Bypassing RDNS check for specific addresses?
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Tracy wrote: > > Greetings, > > Is there a way to cause XMail to "whitelist" an IP address or address block > from MAPS/RDNS checking? I've got someone who runs a private mailing list > on their server, but doesn't have reverse DNS set up (actually, they did, > but their ISP messed it up). Is there a way I can tell XMail to just let > their server through without worrying about MAPS and/or RDNS? Nope. Let him run XMail and let him setup SMTP auth for outbound messages in XMail :) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: 1.16-pre01 ...
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Beau E. Cox wrote: > Hi Davide - > > ~11 hours + ~2000 emails + no user complaints = > it works! Yesterday I realized that the documentation is wrong. You used to put the link syntax L<...> between a "begin html" and "end html". Older versions of pod2* used to convert it anyway but the new one that ships with RH9 is more strict and it does not translate anything that is an html block (that is supposed to be raw html). Noproblem though, I changed it. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: 1.16-pre01 ...
> ~11 hours + ~2000 emails + no user complaints = > it works! here for ~5 hours on our main server without problems, but as i complained, the MAPS logging does not work here :-( -- soenke. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: 1.16-pre01 ...
- Original Message - From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "XMail mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "XMail Announce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:15 PM Subject: [xmail] 1.16-pre01 ... > > > Here are the files : > > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.16-pre01.tar.gz > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.16-pre01.win32bin.zip > > The changelog is inside the tarbal (today I feel lazy). > > > > - Davide > Hi Davide - ~11 hours + ~2000 emails + no user complaints = it works! SuSE 8.2 Linux. Aloha => Beau; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
