Re: [Xpert]Will virgin XFree86 run under LINUX?
On Sunday 15 December 2002 12:36 am, F. Heitkamp wrote: [...] > > I usually move the installed XFree to a temporary location before > attempting a permanent install. i.e. cd /usr/; mv X11R6 X11R6.bak; > cd /path/to/build; make install; > If the install goes off without a hitch and the new X runs OK, I > them move the saved version back and do a make install over the > top. I've noticed that sometimes even though the make World goes > off without a hitch the make install will sometimes fail. > > Fred > All the Linux distros have some level of customization to the install of XFree86. If you want to compile/install a different version of XFree86 from the one that comes in binary form in your distro all you need is to follow the distro rules to obtain a proper installation. As an example, I build XFree86 rpm packages for my RedHat 7.3 installation. I use the spec file from the rawhide packages that Mike Harris maintain as a start to my own custom spec file. Or, if you don't want to make packages, simply look at the install stuff from the package source (pre/post install scripts, custom files, etc) and execute it by yourself. - Davor ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
Re: [Xpert]Will virgin XFree86 run under LINUX?
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:50:17PM -0600, Paul Elliott wrote: > I was at my local LINUX group, where it was said that if you > get the virgin XFree86 tarball, then make World;make install > the resulting system will crash. This is plainly false - so I wonder if they didn't say something slightly different... If you use a distribution like RedHat, Mandrake, Debian, etc that provides extensive package management facilities to the user, compiling XFree86 yourself will probably invalidate your package data. ie - if you install XF86 CVS on a Debian system, apt-get and dpkg don't know about the newer version of X you have. So they'll happily try to download whatever package exists and install it. This sucks, since it'll probably overwite the custom CVS installation you did (assuming you put it in the normal places). If you're a somewhat seasoned Un*x-like guru (or you don't care about screwing up your package manager) this isn't a problem. If you're a newbie, you should definately avoid this - it will cause headaches in the future. -- Ross Vandegrift [EMAIL PROTECTED] A Pope has a Water Cannon. It is a Water Cannon. He fires Holy-Water from it.It is a Holy-Water Cannon. He Blesses it. It is a Holy Holy-Water Cannon. He Blesses the Hell out of it. It is a Wholly Holy Holy-Water Cannon. He has it pierced.It is a Holey Wholly Holy Holy-Water Cannon. He makes it official. It is a Canon Holey Wholly Holy Holy-Water Cannon. Batman and Robin arrive. He shoots them. ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
Re: [Xpert]Will virgin XFree86 run under LINUX?
Feigning erudition, Paul Elliott wrote: % % I was at my local LINUX group, where it was said that if you % get the virgin XFree86 tarball, then make World;make install % the resulting system will crash. It was said that to get an % XFree86 system that actually works, you need the patches % associated with the various distributions. Is this True? Not only is what you were told false, it is perniciously false. I have built the stock 4.2.0 and 4.2.1 releases easily a dozen times with a simple "make World ; make install" and had no problems. Currently, I update my CVS tree every night and build and install it every few days. Again, it works just fine for me. Kurt -- If one studies too zealously, one easily loses his pants. -- A. Einstein. ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
Re: [Xpert]Will virgin XFree86 run under LINUX?
Davor Buvinic wrote: On Saturday 14 December 2002 05:50 pm, Paul Elliott wrote: I was at my local LINUX group, where it was said that if you get the virgin XFree86 tarball, then make World;make install the resulting system will crash. It was said that to get an XFree86 system that actually works, you need the patches associated with the various distributions. Is this True? Thank you. I'm working with current CVS without any patch and I don't see any crash. Frequently the distribution maintainers include patches to fix some issues with hardware but generally they also send it to the XFree86 developers so they are integrated into the main tree. I too have successfully installed X from CVS numerous times. I think that the proper way to build XFree86, before do a 'make World', is at least read the documentation included in the distribution and look at the configuration options in xc/config/cf. Tell this to the folks at your local LUG. You should probably check for a custom host.def in your /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config directory. I suppose there may be a custom one there. You could use that for the new build. I usually move the installed XFree to a temporary location before attempting a permanent install. i.e. cd /usr/; mv X11R6 X11R6.bak; cd /path/to/build; make install; If the install goes off without a hitch and the new X runs OK, I them move the saved version back and do a make install over the top. I've noticed that sometimes even though the make World goes off without a hitch the make install will sometimes fail. Fred ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
[Xpert]sunffb driver (creator3d etc) possible bug...
I have submitted bug reports to QT and kde on this one.. but after testing... the bug only happens on the sunffb driver. Here's the low down: In QT tree widgets (the default style, sgi and motif styles for instance do not display the bug), the vertical lines which connect the tree items appear WAY off. IE: you expand a tree and the vertical line is drawn say 3 inches to the left instead of directly under the +/- sign. Using the exact same binaries (qt and kde) on a fresh debian woody sparc linux install on both machines, the problem only shows up on the sparc box with the creator3d card / x server. I have tried the latest 'testing 4.2' binaries from debian and it doesn't resolve the issue. The machine which works great is a 440mhz ultra10 clone with a raptor card (glint driver). The machine with the bug is an ultra60 2x300mhz box with a creator3d. I am willing to make this machine available to those who would like to help me narrow this down to get it resolved. I am a software developer myself, however I do not have the time to ramp up on the innards of X server code, but would be glad to assist anyone who is 'in the know' when it comes to what might be causing this. Wayne ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
Re: [Xpert]Decimal key on European keyboard layouts
fre 2002-12-13 klockan 17.44 skrev Robin Rosenberg:
> > Anyone else seen this? Suggestions?
>
> It seems this is a feature (i.e. a documented bug) of X11,
> The keypad decimal key is mapped to KP_Decimal which is a symbolic key, translated
> somewhere on the application side.
Ouch. What's wrong with simply using the character that's printed on the
key? :)
> The workaround is xmodmap -e "keycode 91 = comma". I notice some keymaps (cz,sk)
> have fixed this, although they have commented the fix as inappropriate.
Thanks for the pointer. The comments looks like this:
// This certainly shouldn't be 'comma'. Something like KP_DecimalComma
// would be better but there's no such definition in keysyms.
key { type="FOUR_LEVEL_KEYPAD", [ KP_Delete, comma,
KP_Delete, KP_Decimal] };
So it seems the comment is only about that it should really be a decimal
comma and not just an ordinary comma. It seems the comment is not about
the purpose of the fix being wrong.
If anyone can give any pointers on how to correctly adapt this fix for
the se, fi, dk, nl, no, de_CH, and de layouts, that would be most
helpful. I'm not sure I understand the file format well enough.
Christian
___
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
Re: [Xpert]Will virgin XFree86 run under LINUX?
On Saturday 14 December 2002 05:50 pm, Paul Elliott wrote: > I was at my local LINUX group, where it was said that if you > get the virgin XFree86 tarball, then make World;make install > the resulting system will crash. It was said that to get an > XFree86 system that actually works, you need the patches > associated with the various distributions. Is this True? > > Thank you. I'm working with current CVS without any patch and I don't see any crash. Frequently the distribution maintainers include patches to fix some issues with hardware but generally they also send it to the XFree86 developers so they are integrated into the main tree. I think that the proper way to build XFree86, before do a 'make World', is at least read the documentation included in the distribution and look at the configuration options in xc/config/cf. Tell this to the folks at your local LUG. - Davor ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
Re: [Xpert]Linux driver for ATI MP-6: any hope?
On Sam, 2002-12-14 at 19:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 12:06:30 -0500 >From: Kevin Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I'm having a lot of trouble getting X to run on my Toshiba Satellite >> 1905-S301 laptop... > >Here's the culprit. You need a driver that supports this chipset. > >> (--) PCI:*(1:0:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x4c59) rev 0, Mem @ 0xf000/27, >0xe800/16, I/O @ 0x3000/8 > >Current xfree86 cvs identifies that chip as PCI_CHIP_RADEON_LY > >(http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86PciInfo.h?rev=1.138&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup) >so may be usable on that machine. I don't know if the driver supports >though. > > Thank you very much. That's a big clue, although it also means that > I'm in big trouble... > > The drivers situation in this case appears to be pretty hopeless. The > chip is an ATI M6-P (Mobility). ATI does not give out or sell drivers > for it to the public (it directs users to the laptop's manufacturer, > which in the case of Toshiba is a dead end). > > I write to the list in the hope that the situation may be less bleak > than it looks from my (very ignorant) viewpoint. Is it possible to > find a Linux driver for this chip? The M6 LY has been supported by XFree86 since 4.2.0, or am I missing something? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
Re: [Xpert]Decimal key on European keyboard layouts
Robin Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > fredagen den 13 december 2002 02.12 skrev Christian Rose: > > Hi! > > > > When I press "," (the decimal symbol key) on the numerical part of my > > Swedish keyboard in XFree86, I get a "." (point). This is obviously > > wrong, as it should be a comma, the decimal symbol that is used in > > Sweden and what this key is labeled with on Swedish standard keyboards. > > > > I've checked some other keyboard layouts and others for which the > > decimal key on the numeric keypad is a comma is as follows: > > Finland (identical to the Swedish layout), Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, > > Switzerland, Germany. I suspect that these may be wrongly defined as > > point too. > > > > Anyone else seen this? Suggestions? > > It seems this is a feature (i.e. a documented bug) of X11, > The keypad decimal key is mapped to KP_Decimal which is a symbolic key, translated > somewhere on the application side. > The workaround is xmodmap -e "keycode 91 = comma". I notice some keymaps (cz,sk) > have fixed this, although they have commented the fix as inappropriate. > > So, where is KP_Decimal translated to "." ? .Xdefaults can be used for some >applications (XLIb?, xterm etc) > but not others (GTK, QT). The default GTK+ input method uses a big table of Keysym => Unicode translations, originally based on work by Markus Kuhn. Probably that table needs a runtime exception for KP_Decimal Just filed a bug on it: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101225 Regards, Owen ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
Re: [Xpert]Decimal key on European keyboard layouts
fre 2002-12-13 klockan 11.13 skrev Dr Andrew C Aitchison: > > When I press "," (the decimal symbol key) on the numerical part of my > > Swedish keyboard in XFree86, I get a "." (point). This is obviously > > wrong, as it should be a comma, the decimal symbol that is used in > > Sweden and what this key is labeled with on Swedish standard keyboards. > > > > I've checked some other keyboard layouts and others for which the > > decimal key on the numeric keypad is a comma is as follows: > > Finland (identical to the Swedish layout), Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, > > Switzerland, Germany. I suspect that these may be wrongly defined as > > point too. > > > > Anyone else seen this? Suggestions? > > I'm not an expert on internationalization, but I think that in an > ideal world, what it prints should be controlled by the LC_NUMERIC > locale setting. I doubt that this is the right approach. I think the goal of the keyboard layout should be to match what characters are printed on the keyboard. To have it send the wrong character, a character that isn't printed on the key, based on some environment variable is just broken. Also, the comma should be the same comma as on the regular keys. It may not only be used for entering decimals, even if that's certainly the most common usage. If one desperately needs a Swedish layout with a point on the numeric keyboard, then a seperate layout should be created for that purpose. > Can you get any clue from the commands "locale" and "xev" whether > the key is sending the wrong value, or whether the wrong value is > being printed ? I get: KeyPress event, serial 25, synthetic NO, window 0x401, root 0x46, subw 0x402, time 517414115, (51,51), root:(53,93), state 0x10, keycode 91 (keysym 0xffae, KP_Decimal), same_screen YES, XLookupString gives 1 characters: "." KeyRelease event, serial 25, synthetic NO, window 0x401, root 0x46, subw 0x402, time 517414194, (51,51), root:(53,93), state 0x10, keycode 91 (keysym 0xffae, KP_Decimal), same_screen YES, XLookupString gives 1 characters: "." The locale is sv_SE.UTF-8, and the same happens with just sv_SE. > Looking at the unicode charts (especially the character name index > http://www.unicode.org/charts/charindex.html > ) I see that ASCII dot 0x2E has become Unicode 0x002E "Decimal Point" > and ASCII comma 0x2C has become 0x002C "decimal separator". > http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U.pdf > renders these in the English way, not the continental one you desire. I doubt this has anything with Unicode to do -- the behavior is the same regardless of if UTF-8 is being used or not. Christian ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
[Xpert]Will virgin XFree86 run under LINUX?
I was at my local LINUX group, where it was said that if you get the virgin XFree86 tarball, then make World;make install the resulting system will crash. It was said that to get an XFree86 system that actually works, you need the patches associated with the various distributions. Is this True? Thank you. -- Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096 [EMAIL PROTECTED]PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J http://www.io.com/~pelliott/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117 msg11609/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Xpert]Decimal key on European keyboard layouts
fre 2002-12-13 klockan 11.01 skrev Robin Rosenberg: > > Anyone else seen this? > > Just checked. I have a lap top so I can't say I'm using the "numerical" keypad, > but the comma key generates a period. This must be hell to anyone trying to > do accounting, paying bills or other numerically intensive data entry. Exactly. Gnumeric/Gnucash/OpenOffice Calc and so on are pretty much unusable with the numeric keypad, since they (correctly, since I use a locale that uses comma as the decimal character) expect decimals entered with commas. > I, at least > use the numerical keypad on desktop computer, which means I have not needed > the comma for long time (on a desktop computer). I may be that paying bills does > not require the fraction that often when using kronas. Finns should have a real > problem though. I doubt there is a difference in this case. > >Suggestions? > > File a bug report or submit a patch or both. I've previously filed a report, but I haven't been able to figure out a patch for this problem myself. It involves overlaying the default numeric keymap if I remember correctly, something I don't know how to do. Christian ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
Re: [Xpert]Decimal key on European keyboard layouts
fre 2002-12-13 klockan 10.58 skrev Xavier Bestel: > > When I press "," (the decimal symbol key) on the numerical part of my > > Swedish keyboard in XFree86, I get a "." (point). This is obviously > > wrong, as it should be a comma, the decimal symbol that is used in > > Sweden and what this key is labeled with on Swedish standard keyboards. > > > > I've checked some other keyboard layouts and others for which the > > decimal key on the numeric keypad is a comma is as follows: > > Finland (identical to the Swedish layout), Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, > > Switzerland, Germany. I suspect that these may be wrongly defined as > > point too. > > > > Anyone else seen this? Suggestions? > > Not a suggestion, but here my french keyboard has a dot "." on the num > keypad, although the french decimal sign is the comma "," ... perhaps > there are keyboards like this in your country ? That would explain the > mistake. I haven't seen any Swedish keyboards that don't use comma on the numeric keypad. Note that I didn't include "France" in the list of standard keyboard layouts above, because it does, as you point out, use a point on the numeric keypad. Christian ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
Re: [Xpert]Re: Re: Missing EuroSign on AltGr+5 on Swedish/Finnishkeyboard layout
lör 2002-12-14 klockan 19.11 skrev Mike A. Harris: > >> >This is my first attempt at a patch, please let me know if there is > >> >something wrong. > >> > >> At a quick glance, the patch looks ok. Patches should be > >> submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED], in order to go into the patch > >> queue for inclusion. > > > >Thanks. I've done so now. > > It's been applied to CVS now. Great. Thanks a lot to everyone involved. Christian ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
[Xpert]Linux driver for ATI MP-6: any hope?
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 12:06:30 -0500 From: Kevin Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm having a lot of trouble getting X to run on my Toshiba Satellite > 1905-S301 laptop... Here's the culprit. You need a driver that supports this chipset. > (--) PCI:*(1:0:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x4c59) rev 0, Mem @ 0xf000/27, 0xe800/16, I/O @ 0x3000/8 Current xfree86 cvs identifies that chip as PCI_CHIP_RADEON_LY (http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86PciInfo.h?rev=1.138&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup) so may be usable on that machine. I don't know if the driver supports though. Thank you very much. That's a big clue, although it also means that I'm in big trouble... The drivers situation in this case appears to be pretty hopeless. The chip is an ATI M6-P (Mobility). ATI does not give out or sell drivers for it to the public (it directs users to the laptop's manufacturer, which in the case of Toshiba is a dead end). I write to the list in the hope that the situation may be less bleak than it looks from my (very ignorant) viewpoint. Is it possible to find a Linux driver for this chip? Thanks all the help! kj ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
[Xpert]Re: Re: Missing EuroSign on AltGr+5 on Swedish/Finnish keyboardlayout
On 13 Dec 2002, Christian Rose wrote: >Date: 13 Dec 2002 05:10:38 +0100 >From: Christian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain >List-Id: An all-purpose XFree86 discussion forum >Subject: Re: Re: Missing EuroSign on AltGr+5 on Swedish/Finnish keyboard >layout > >fre 2002-12-13 klockan 04.33 skrev Mike A. Harris: >> >This is my first attempt at a patch, please let me know if there is >> >something wrong. >> >> At a quick glance, the patch looks ok. Patches should be >> submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED], in order to go into the patch >> queue for inclusion. > >Thanks. I've done so now. It's been applied to CVS now. -- Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
Re: [Xpert]Please HELP: installing X on Toshiba Satellite 1905-S301
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having a lot of trouble getting X to run on my Toshiba Satellite 1905-S301 laptop. I have searched many of the sites that supposedly have info on installing Linux on Toshibas (for example http://www.linux-on-laptops.com/, and http://linux.toshiba-dme.co.jp/linux/index.htm), but I've found Try http://newsletter.toshiba-tro.de/main/ (though I see no 1905 there). Anyway the site gives a good reason to avoid toshiba: "Toshiba only supports officially Microsoft operating systems at this time." (and even on those it works badly and the support is laughable, I should add) Bye -- Luca Olivetti Note.- This message reached you today, it may not tomorrow if you are using MAPS services. They arbitrarily include in their lists IP addresses not related in any way to spam, and in so doing are disrupting Internet connectivity. Please stop supporting them. See http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/05/21/1944247 msg11603/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Xpert]Please HELP: installing X on Toshiba Satellite 1905-S301
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm having a lot of trouble getting X to run on my Toshiba Satellite > 1905-S301 laptop. I have searched many of the sites that supposedly > have info on installing Linux on Toshibas (for example > http://www.linux-on-laptops.com/, and > http://linux.toshiba-dme.co.jp/linux/index.htm), but I've found > absolutely no hardware or X installation information at all for 1905 > models. (Maybe they are too new? If so, what older Toshiba models > are closest, as far as running X goes, to the 1905s?) > > The error I get when I run startx is basically "No devices detected." > I include the full /var/log/XFree86.0.log and /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 > files below. > > I'd be more than happy to post any other information that may help > diagnosing the problem. > > Thanks! > > KJ Here's the first thing to try. You are running 4.1.x, which is rather dated now. I'd suggest getting a newer version (although check my comment below.) > > XFree86 Version 4.1.0.1 / X Window System > (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6510) > Release Date: 21 December 2001 > If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is > newer than the above date, look for a newer version before > reporting problems. (See http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ) Here's the culprit. You need a driver that supports this chipset. > (--) PCI:*(1:0:0) ATI unknown chipset (0x4c59) rev 0, Mem @ 0xf000/27, >0xe800/16, I/O @ 0x3000/8 Current xfree86 cvs identifies that chip as PCI_CHIP_RADEON_LY (http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86PciInfo.h?rev=1.138&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup) so may be usable on that machine. I don't know if the driver supports though. -- Kevin ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
[Xpert]Please HELP: installing X on Toshiba Satellite 1905-S301
I'm having a lot of trouble getting X to run on my Toshiba Satellite 1905-S301 laptop. I have searched many of the sites that supposedly have info on installing Linux on Toshibas (for example http://www.linux-on-laptops.com/, and http://linux.toshiba-dme.co.jp/linux/index.htm), but I've found absolutely no hardware or X installation information at all for 1905 models. (Maybe they are too new? If so, what older Toshiba models are closest, as far as running X goes, to the 1905s?) The error I get when I run startx is basically "No devices detected." I include the full /var/log/XFree86.0.log and /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 files below. I'd be more than happy to post any other information that may help diagnosing the problem. Thanks! KJ P.S. Please Cc: me in your replies (otherwise I won't get to see your reply until the digest arrives). # /var/log/XFree86.0.log This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any way. Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions, please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs) XFree86 Version 4.1.0.1 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6510) Release Date: 21 December 2001 If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is newer than the above date, look for a newer version before reporting problems. (See http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ) Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.17 i686 [ELF] Module Loader present (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sat Dec 14 03:54:46 2002 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4" Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) ServerLayout "Default Layout" (**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "Generic Monitor" (**) | |-->Device "Generic Video Card" (**) |-->Input Device "Generic Keyboard" (**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" (**) XKB: rules: "xfree86" (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc85" (**) XKB: model: "pc85" (**) Option "XkbLayout" "us" (**) XKB: layout: "us" (==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled (**) |-->Input Device "Configured Mouse" (**) |-->Input Device "Generic Mouse" (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (**) FontPath set to "unix/:7100,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi" (==) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" (==) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" (--) using VT number 7 (WW) Cannot open APM (II) Module ABI versions: XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.1 XFree86 Video Driver: 0.4 XFree86 XInput driver : 0.2 XFree86 Server Extension : 0.1 XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.2 (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a (II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.2 (II) Loading font Bitmap (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a (II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version = 0.1.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.4 (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 (II) PCI: Config type is 1 (II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x8002013c, mode1Res1 = 0x8000 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 8086,1a30 card 1179,ff00 rev 04 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 8086,1a31 card , rev 04 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:1e:0: chip 8086,244e card , rev 05 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:1f:0: chip 8086,2440 card , rev 05 class 06,01,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:1f:1: chip 8086,244b card 1179,ff00 rev 05 class 01,01,80 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:1f:2: chip 8086,2442 card 1179,ff00 rev 05 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:1f:3: chip 8086,2443 card 1179,ff00 rev 05 class 0c,05,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:1f:4: chip 8086,2444 card 1179,ff00 rev 05 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:1f:5: chip 8086,2445 card 1179,ff00 rev 05 class 04,01,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:1f:6: chip 8086,2446 card 1179,0001 rev 05 class 07,03,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 01:00:0: chip 1002,4c59 card 1179,ff00 rev 00 class 03,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 02:00:0: chip 1217,6933 card 0001, rev 01 class 06,07,00 hdr 82 (II) PCI: 02:00:1: chip 1217,6933 card 0001, rev 01 class 06,07,00 hdr 82 (II) PCI: 02:08:0: chip 8086,2449
Re: [Xpert]Last update to ClearlyU fonts in CVS
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 12:49:12PM -0300, Davor Buvinic wrote: >There is a small error in the last update to the ClearlyU fonts in CVS. Thanks, I'm committing the fix now. David ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
[Xpert]Last update to ClearlyU fonts in CVS
There is a small error in the last update to the ClearlyU fonts in CVS. - Davor Index: xc/fonts/bdf/misc/Imakefile === RCS file: /cvs/xc/fonts/bdf/misc/Imakefile,v retrieving revision 1.28 diff -u -3 -p -r1.28 Imakefile --- xc/fonts/bdf/misc/Imakefile 2002/12/14 03:55:25 1.28 +++ xc/fonts/bdf/misc/Imakefile 2002/12/14 15:22:14 @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ LinkSourceFile(cu-lig12.bdf,$(CLEARLYUDI LinkSourceFile(cu-pua12.bdf,$(CLEARLYUDIR)) LinkSourceFile(cu12.bdf,$(CLEARLYUDIR)) LinkSourceFile(cuarabic12.bdf,$(CLEARLYUDIR)) -LinkSourceFile(cudevnag.bdf,$(CLEARLYUDIR)) +LinkSourceFile(cudevnag12.bdf,$(CLEARLYUDIR)) #endif #if BuildUCSFonts && TruncateUCSFonts ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
[Xpert]Savage 4
Good day ! Anybody knows about savage 4 support in Xfree ? can i use Opengl ? ___ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
