kent williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly, what matters besides the actual compositions?
maybe i'm taking this one line too much out of context, but that
sounds like a frighteningly traditionalist rhetorical question.
in one sense i do agree, hence my bringing up that there's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Self-appointed golden ears dismiss feeling and creativity, because
anyone can appreciate those qualities in music (though not always at first
blush, since some tastes are acquired), whereas it takes a genuine
superior class of lonely douche to prioritize the production
Well, don't be too frightened. All I'm saying is ... well it's right
there in the Bible Matthew 7:16: By their fruits ye shall know them.
It's been a long way around through a sometimes interesting debate,
but the bottom line for me is that it's an argument that pretty silly.
I make tracks, so
I honestly think the same thing is possible with Laptops, but maybe we
haven't seen the Ron Hardy or Derrick May of the laptop yet. But it's
silly to argue that computers, in and of themselves, are the problem.
agreed. a big problem when switching over to computer, just like
from analog to
so what you are saying basically is that laptop and computer music are
still in relative infancy so the majority (or at least a large number) of
the users/musicians still haven't progressed much beyond the discovery
stage.
philosophically speaking therefore, this music is not inherently
so what you are saying basically is that laptop and computer
music are still in relative infancy so the majority (or at least a
large number) of the users/musicians still haven't progressed much
beyond the discovery stage.
philosophically speaking therefore, this music is not inherently
Honestly, what matters besides the actual compositions? I'm enough of
a studio rat to care about things are produced, but the actual method
that someone uses is irrelevant, except as it facilitates the result.
It's not like you can't make sh*t tracks with analog gear.
I program computers for a
kent williams wrote:
Honestly, what matters besides the actual compositions? I'm enough of
a studio rat to care about things are produced, but the actual method
that someone uses is irrelevant, except as it facilitates the result.
It's not like you can't make sh*t tracks with analog gear.
I'm confused now. Can someone summarise or conclude this thread for me.
Is analogue better than digital or vice versa???
-Original Message-
From: Brian Prince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 4 September 2006 6:35 a.m.
To: kent williams
Cc: list 313
Subject: Re: (313) The Laptop
Ralf Gill \(healthAlliance\) wrote:
I'm confused now. Can someone summarise or conclude this thread for me.
Is analogue better than digital or vice versa???
Good music is better than bad music.
- bp
10 matches
Mail list logo
