A little off topic:
When talking about "The Bells", check this:
http://media.putfile.com/jinglebells72
Happy x-mas to all from this lurker. ;-)
Peter
PS: got this from the g-tech mailinglist.
On 12/23/05, Tristan Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thought I'd have another quick shot at thi
Thought I'd have another quick shot at this today (can you tell I'm making
sure I do as little as possible with my holiday???), and I'm constantly
amazed at what the discogs user base is like. For instance, I figured just
about everyone owned a copy of DJ Shadow's Entroducing, but even after
adding
robin wrote on Wed, 21 Dec 2005 about following:
I have a lot of Roule records but not thisI'd got sick of hearing it not
long after it came out.
I have few Roule records, even the Stardust one. Thought they were
trendy at the time. Nevertheless, nowadays looking back they are mostly
g
hehe, i have that as well, but on a bootleg. counting all vinyl/12"
releases where this tune appears i guess that one wins the competition.
windowlicker was the first record i was thinking of, but not even 1000
discogs members have it (the official 12" version):
http://www.discogs.com/release/
On 12/21/05, robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a lot of Roule records but not thisI'd got sick of hearing it
> not long after it came out.
i have all of them up to trax on da rocks 2. i only got that one
recently because it was on a distro list and it had been about 6 years
since it
>i think what it all boils down to here is that techno people are the
>bigger dorks on the internets adding things to their discogs
>collections
*dink*
nail/head etc
yours,
mr D.Ork
_
- End of message text -
I have a lot of Roule records but not thisI'd got sick of hearing it
not long after it came out.
robin...
Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
i think what it all boils down to here is that techno people are the
bigger dorks on the internets adding things to their discogs
collections. because even
i think what it all boils down to here is that techno people are the
bigger dorks on the internets adding things to their discogs
collections. because even this:
http://www.discogs.com/release/4087
is beat by those jams, and i swear every single person under the sun
(including me! and i dont have
PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 December 2005 16:46
> To: 313
> Subject: Re: (313) discogs.com
>
> no no no
> remixes don't count
> :-)
>
> since we're on the train
> what's
gt;
12/21/05 10:29 AM cc
Subject
Please respond to RE: (313) discogs.com
>whats a frogbot, i want one too
well
I mean. its obviosuly a frog crossed with a robot.
but no. this time its different.
this is infact a GBOT with a 'FRO.
a g-bot is a robot version of g-unit.
so its like a rapper crossed with a robot, with an afro with frogslegs.
watchathinkaboutthatthen?
TED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'313'" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 5:32 PM
Subject: RE: (313) discogs.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 December 2005 16:23
To: 313
Subject
> -Original Message-
> From: fab. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 December 2005 16:39
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; '313'
> Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: (313) discogs.com
>
> whats a frogbot, i want one too
You can have the original:
http:/
whats a frogbot, i want one too
fab.
- Original Message -
From: "Tristan Watkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'313'" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 5:32 PM
Subject: RE: (313) discogs.com
-
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 December 2005 16:23
> To: 313
> Subject: Re: (313) discogs.com
>
>
> ok, my bet
> who finds one higher
>
> http://www.discogs.com/release/165
Kat Moda + Kat Moda m
Ha, thought I'd try something dead popular - picked Gat Décor, went for the
Effective release which I guessed would be most widespread
http://www.discogs.com/release/43465
158!
The other releases are like "3 people have this"!
Maybe people with this record aren't trainspotter-y enough to corres
Best I could find: http://www.discogs.com/release/1695
-skkatter
On 21/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok, my bet
> who finds one higher
>
> http://www.discogs.com/release/165
--
http://www.skkatter.net
ok, my bet
who finds one higher
http://www.discogs.com/release/165
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "313" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 5:15 PM
Subject: (313) discogs.com
for a figure addict like me %)
is it possible to see which rele
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "313" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: (313) discogs.com smoking crack rocks?
> Scotto wrote on Tue, 6 Jul 2004 about following:
>
> > "non-excistant" record so i gave up at that point. it just ma
for ever to get back with me. it
took so long i forgot i had entered it. this was a while ago (1 1/2 yars
maybe??).
- Original Message -
From: "placid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Scotto'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday
Scotto wrote on Tue, 6 Jul 2004 about following:
"non-excistant" record so i gave up at that point. it just makes me wounder
how many other releases they messed up. maybe that cosmic light force and
i don't have any figures but i think there's plenty of errors, and
the mods constantly tell to
It isn't in discogs, I have the red vinyl 12", not a 7".
Maybe you spelt chesire instead of Cheshire.
p
-Original Message-
From: Scotto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2004 10:28
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) discogs.com smoking crack rocks?
i tried
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:27:54AM -0400, Scotto wrote:
> i tried to have to put acid pimp's first record up, chesire #1, it took them
> 4 months for them tell me the record did not excist. well i have this
> "non-excistant" record so i gave up at that point. it just makes me wounder
> how many oth
i tried to have to put acid pimp's first record up, chesire #1, it took them
4 months for them tell me the record did not excist. well i have this
"non-excistant" record so i gave up at that point. it just makes me wounder
how many other releases they messed up. maybe that cosmic light force and
ga
Yeah I've had similar strange reasons for rejection of comments from
discogs. Yet at the same time I've seen the most anodyne, wierd (i.e. not
particularly reflective of the music) or sometimes just plain idiot comments
on there!
I have had some comments passed - but again, the reasons why they we
perhaps you should not say "when I played to a crowd", and you should
instead say "when played to a crowd of it was accepted openly".
I can see the line that they don't want to cross. If they allowed reviews
like that, they'd have every bedroom dj in teh world sliding in quips
about how good
liance); 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: RE: (313) Discogs.com question
>
>
>If you have plenty of rare Theo and Moodyman listed you might win a big
>golden sheep.
>
>Quest
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ralf Gill (healthAlliance) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>S
lloween Big respect! :o) I
hope to do another one later this year!
-Original Message-
From: Ralf Gill (healthAlliance) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 March 2004 20:30
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Discogs.com question
Wondering why would one want to put u
If you have plenty of rare Theo and Moodyman listed you might win a big
golden sheep.
Quest
-Original Message-
From: Ralf Gill (healthAlliance) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 5:30 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Discogs.com question
Wondering why
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Discogs.com question
I only got mine up a few days ago, sure enough the next day I got the same
sort of email. ,seems like more people will email you about your want list
though.
What i do find annoying is people saying i have this record
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've started building my collection on discogs and just got an email from
someone wanting to buy one of my records - is this common?
None of my records on there are for sale, I just use the website as a
back-up to my library database I have at
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 March 2004 21:41
To: Garrett
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org; Ralf Gill (healthAlliance)
Subject: Re: (313) Discogs.com question
And it acts as a sort of DIY group effort to catalogue the music we
like
-
especially for those labels that are either no longer in existence,
Very handy for finding unreleased / promo versions u never knew existed
aswell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 March 2004 21:41
To: Garrett
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org; Ralf Gill (healthAlliance)
Subject: Re: (313) Discogs.com question
And
And it acts as a sort of DIY group effort to catalogue the music we like -
especially for those labels that are either no longer in existence, don't
have websites, or don't list their discogs.
I use it for this reason and the below mentioned
>it's a very effective way of keeping track of your
sale? Does the person with the
best collection win something or get receive greater functionality
from the website?
-Original Message-
From: Lee Herrington IV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 March 2004 4:36 a.m.
To: 313
Subject: RE: (313) Discogs.com question
i've be
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 March 2004 4:36 a.m.
To: 313
Subject: RE: (313) Discogs.com question
i've been solicited on a few occasions. however, when i have attempted to
negotiate a sale at a price that i am happy with, i have received no
response. i think some folks just give up on eba
i've been solicited on a few occasions. however, when i have attempted to
negotiate a sale at a price that i am happy with, i have received no
response. i think some folks just give up on ebay and GEMM and make an
effort at acquiring rare titles from collectors online.
cheers,
lrh
-Orig
ge is very true - imagine what it'll be like in ten
years' time? Trying to source those original or rare slates is only gonna
get harder...
Peace,
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: quest pond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 January 2004 14:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperr
I only got mine up a few days ago, sure enough the next day I got the same
sort of email. ,seems like more people will email you about your want list
though.
What i do find annoying is people saying i have this record 'from your want
list' without naming a price, then when you ask its like 60 pou
From: Paul Kendrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 March 2004 16:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Discogs.com question
If I have a record that I want to sell I'll send an email to people who
have it in there wants list, so I suppose that people will also try to
b
If I have a record that I want to sell I'll send an email to people who have it
in there wants list, so I suppose that people will also try to buy records off
peeps that have them in there collection..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 March
Yes, very, very common indeed.
Check my profile for a good way to dis-courage people from doing this (it
still happens though.)
http://www.discogs.com/~Mr.Blackman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 March 2004 4:09
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject
42 matches
Mail list logo
