Re: [Ace] Summary of ACE Group Communication Security Discussion

Michael StJohns wrote: > The multiparty (group) symmetric key solution is only wanted for a > single corner of the solution space - low latency, no cost > systems. E.g. lightbulbs. Given there is a worked example of the > insecurity of multiparty symmetric

Re: [Ace] Summary of ACE Group Communication Security Discussion

On 11/16/2016 9:08 AM, Kepeng Li wrote: Hello all, We had a long discussion about group communication security topic since the previous F2F meeting. Hannes and I have tried to make a summary about the discussion as follows: · The solution needs to define both, symmetric and an

[Ace] Slides for the Seoul F2F meeting

Hello all, We are still missing some slides for some of the agenda items. Document authors / presenters, please send your slides to us (co-chairs and acting chairs) ASAP. BTW: draft agenda is below. Kind Regards Kepeng ACE WG Meeting IETF 97 - Seoul Thursday, 17 Nov, 2016, 15:20 - 17:50

[Ace] Summary of ACE Group Communication Security Discussion

Hello all,  We had a long discussion about group communication security topic since the previous F2F meeting. Hannes and I have tried to make a summary about the discussion as follows: ·   The solution needs to define both, symmetric and an asymmetric group key solution. ·   The