[Bug 8950] acpi-cpufreq reports 44.61 GHz - Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600, XFX NForce 650i Ultra

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8950 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 23:00 --- Created an attachment (id=12593) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12593action=view) dmesg -s64000 output -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8953] boot crash - Processor Device is not present - Acer Aspire 5050-4570 (Turion64 MK-38)

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 23:25 --- Does a kernel built with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=n boot in ACPI mode? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this

[Bug 8896] wireless works only with acpi=off - ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 23:28 --- Plese get the /proc/interrups after booting with acpi=force. Will you please boot the system with the option of acpi=force pci=noacpi ? -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8950] acpi-cpufreq reports 44.61 GHz - Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600, XFX NForce 650i Ultra

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8950 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-28 23:55 --- [ 19.894654] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_PR_.CPU0._PDC] (Node 8100378b5220), AE_ALREADY_EXISTS [ 19.894664] ACPI: Marking method _PDC as

[Bug 8953] boot crash - Processor Device is not present - Acer Aspire 5050-4570 (Turion64 MK-38)

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 00:08 --- Yes. Btw, apparently the message for the 2.6.18 kernel has acpiid 0x1, not 0x01. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Bug 8950] acpi-cpufreq reports 44.61 GHz - Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600, XFX NForce 650i Ultra

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8950 --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 00:11 --- SSDT2.dsl: Name (CFGD, 0x780783F2) // dunno if the run-time SSDT's change this or not, but lets assume // that they don't until we see them... SSDT1.dsl:

[Bug 8896] wireless works only with acpi=off - ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 00:18 --- Created an attachment (id=12596) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12596action=view) cat interrupts with acpi=force to kernel -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8950] acpi-cpufreq reports 44.61 GHz - Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600, XFX NForce 650i Ultra

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8950 --- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 00:33 --- I will attach the requested files when I get home from work today (the machine in question is my home machine). I verified that scaling was working in XP using the CPU-Z

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Config-Tables |BIOS Summary|wireless works

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 00:52 --- Created an attachment (id=12598) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12598action=view) acpidump with acpi=force noacpi to kernel -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 00:53 --- Created an attachment (id=12600) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12600action=view) dmesg -s64000 with acpi=force noacpi to kernel -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:01 --- the /proc/interrupts shown in comment #3 is mis-labeled, It can't be from an acpi=off boot because it clearly shows that the acpi interrupt is enabled on IOAPIC IRQ 9. The

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:02 --- please stop attaching copies of acpidump and dmidecode output -- these do not change with different kernels. -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #26 from

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:15 --- Hi, Comment #17: With acpi=force pci=noacpi, the computer boots, recognize the usb but not the wireless card. I tried to be attentive in making these reports, so I just

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:17 --- Device (ALKD) { Name (_HID, EisaId (PNP0C0F)) Name (_UID, 0x08) Method (_PRS, 0, NotSerialized)

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 00:53 --- Created an attachment (id=12602) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12602action=view) dmidecode with acpi=force noacpi to kernel -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 00:54 --- Created an attachment (id=12603) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12603action=view) lspci -v with acpioff noacpi to kernel -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:22 --- Re: acpi=force pci=noacpi [ 22.488000] wlan: 0.8.4.2 (0.9.3.1) [ 22.612000] ath_pci: 0.9.4.5 (0.9.3.1) [ 22.612000] PCI: Enabling device :00:06.0 ( - 0002) [

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:26 --- Comment #29: I made no change to BIOS. I just made once an update of the BIOS from the Packard Bell site for this computer (Easy Note R1983 W, serial number: 647303620230).

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:26 --- Is the wireless adapter attached to the motherboard? If yes, are there any options related to it in BIOS SETUP? If no, can you try moving it to another slot? -- Configure

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:10 --- Created an attachment (id=12604) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12604action=view) cat /proc/interupts with acpi=force pci=noacpi to kernel -- Configure

[Bug 8953] boot crash - Processor Device is not present - Acer Aspire 5050-4570 (Turion64 MK-38)

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:31 --- Well, when I say it boots, I mean it gets past the kernel-level acpi stuff loading, but the acpi daemon still hangs in the 2.6.22 kernel; the 2.6.18 kernel behaves more nicely.

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:32 --- in XP... Start Control Panel System Hardware Device Manager View Resources by type IRQ I know people have got this list into text form and pasted it to bug reports, but I'm

[Bug 8953] boot crash - Processor Device is not present - Acer Aspire 5050-4570 (Turion64 MK-38)

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953 --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:35 --- Sorry, I mean the system gets that far normally with the 2.6.18 kernel--with the ACPI daemon hanging. The kernel I'm compiling is 2.6.22. -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:56 --- Created an attachment (id=12605) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12605action=view) cat /proc/interrupts with acpi=force pci=noacpi pci=biosirq -- Configure

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:56 --- Created an attachment (id=12606) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12606action=view) dmesg -s64000 with acpi=force pci=noacpi pci=biosirq -- Configure

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:58 --- Created an attachment (id=12607) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12607action=view) back of the computer, 1 no clue about the wireless card attached or not to

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 01:58 --- Created an attachment (id=12608) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12608action=view) open computer, 2 -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 02:14 --- Comment #33: Read through Windows: Atheros: BUS PCI 0, device 6, function 0, IRQ 19. USB (there are 4 plugs): place 0, BUS PCI 0, device 16, function 0 (1, 2, 3). IRQ 21.

[Bug 43961] Re: Power down after shutdown does not work...

Since again, I had to attach the same lspci file to several bugs, I want to make all devs and bug fixers aware of this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/malone/+bug/3382 I find it is absolutely necessary to be able to attach hardware profiles to launchpad user accounts. I would then simply say, this

[Bug 23336] Re: Battery status don't work correctly on IBM Thinkpad R30

Hi, sorry, from november 2006 I don't use IBM Thinkpad, now I work on HP nx7400. Now it's running Gutsy and it's work fine ... only little different version problem between acpi, acpid and acpi-support package now ... but on a developping version it's usually I think. ;-) -- Battery status

[Bug 8950] acpi-cpufreq reports 44.61 GHz - Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600, XFX NForce 650i Ultra

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8950 --- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 05:17 --- Created an attachment (id=12612) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12612action=view) acpidump outputs requested by Len Brown in comment #7 -- Configure

[Bug 8898] No ACPI Sleep button events

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8898 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 06:18 --- Created an attachment (id=12613) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12613action=view) My acpidump -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8898] No ACPI Sleep button events

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8898 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 06:19 --- I did not load acpi video driver. I use Gentoo with kernel 2.6.22. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this

[Bug 8955] New: cpufreq scaling not available (Sumicom S635F, 945GM, PhoenixAward 6.00, CoreDuo L2400)

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8955 Summary: cpufreq scaling not available (Sumicom S635F, 945GM, PhoenixAward 6.00, CoreDuo L2400) Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 KernelVersion: 2.6.* Platform: All OS/Version:

[Bug 8955] cpufreq scaling not available (Sumicom S635F, 945GM, PhoenixAward 6.00, CoreDuo L2400)

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8955 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 08:33 --- Created an attachment (id=12617) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12617action=view) acpidump -s64000 -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8955] cpufreq scaling not available (Sumicom S635F, 945GM, PhoenixAward 6.00, CoreDuo L2400)

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8955 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 08:36 --- Created an attachment (id=12618) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12618action=view) Output of iasl: 2 Errors -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8709] regression: EmbeddedControl AE_TIME errors, /proc/acpi/battery/* not present

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8709 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment

[Bug 8955] cpufreq scaling not available (Sumicom S635F, 945GM, PhoenixAward 6.00, CoreDuo L2400)

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8955 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 12:55 --- Created an attachment (id=12621) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12621action=view) cat /proc/cpuinfo -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8955] cpufreq scaling not available (Sumicom S635F, 945GM, PhoenixAward 6.00, CoreDuo L2400)

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8955 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12617|acpidump -s64000|acpidump description|

[Bug 8958] regression: fan doesn't work anymore

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8958 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 13:48 --- Created an attachment (id=12622) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12622action=view) patch fixing the problem from Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

[Bug 8958] regression: fan doesn't work anymore

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8958 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 13:51 --- Created an attachment (id=12623) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12623action=view) dmesg of 2.6.23-rc4 with patch with the fixup patch because it doesn't boot

[Bug 8958] regression: fan doesn't work anymore

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8958 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 13:52 --- Created an attachment (id=12624) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12624action=view) acpidump output -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8958] regression: fan doesn't work anymore

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8958 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Regression|0 |1 -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 8958] regression: fan doesn't work anymore

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8958 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 16:33 --- Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:47:36 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8958 Summary:

[Bug 8958] regression: fan doesn't work anymore

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8958 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 16:37 --- On 30/08/2007, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:47:36 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8958

[Bug 8896] ACPI: BIOS age (400) - Packard Bell/Insyde

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896 --- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 18:05 --- (In reply to comment #35) Created an attachment (id=12606) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12606action=view) [details] dmesg -s64000 with acpi=force

[Bug 8860] ACPI Exception (processor_core-0781): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is not present [20070126]

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8860 --- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 18:28 --- I am not understanding the wrong frequency part. The CPU brand string is saying Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6420 @ 2.13GHz and cpufreq is showning the same freq as max.

[Bug 8955] cpufreq scaling not available (Sumicom S635F, 945GM, PhoenixAward 6.00, CoreDuo L2400)

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8955 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acpi- |

[Bug 8630] ACPI Exception (processor_core-0783): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is not present [20070126] - Core 2 Duo E4400

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8630 --- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 22:45 --- Thanks for your info. I think that the bios has at least two bugs on the computer. 1. XSDT has NULL entry. The bug can be skipped using RSDT when XSDT NULL entry is found. 2.