http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
Len Brown changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #73 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-29 03:58 ---
While trying 2.6.26-rc? I noticed that I still had one not-so-handy command in
rc.local, i.e.:
echo enable,0x > /proc/acpi/ibm/hotkey
I removed this and rebooted 2.6.25 wi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #72 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-11 01:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=16097)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16097&action=view)
dmesg output - 2.6.25 with patch
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #71 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-11 00:58 ---
Managed to capture full dmesg output with resume problem on 2.6.25 with your
patch applied. This time, I did not try to speed up resume by repeatedly
pressing the power button.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #7
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #69 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-16 13:29 ---
Hi!
Unfortunately, after several days without problems, I finally hit a resume
problem again, with 2.6.25-rc8, and your patch applied. It is more or less, but
not exactly the s
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #67 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-12 04:01 ---
Hi, I was wondering what the current status of this patch is. Just for your
interest, I'm happy to say that I haven't had resume problems since applying it
to 2.6.25-rc8! So wil
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #66 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-04 01:04 ---
Hi Alexey, the patch seems quite promising! I did a string of about 8 s2disk
and s2ram, with lots of open pdf's, and could not reproduce the problem! It was
a bit disappointing
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #65 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-02 14:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=15581)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15581&action=view)
test patch
There is a test patch, which might appear in next kernel relea
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #64 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-02 13:47 ---
And another test, 2.6.25-rc8; still the same as -rc3. As with -rc3, at the
first time resume is problematic, I find the
"ACPI: EC: missing OBF confirmation, don't expect it any
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #63 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 12:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=14983)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14983&action=view)
2.6.25-rc3 dmesg with sequence of s2disk s2disk s2ram s2disk
--
Configu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #62 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 12:03 ---
Tested 2.6.25-rc3 today. It appeared harder to reproduce the problem, I did
s2disk, s2disk, s2disk, and then s2ram. Problems only occurred on resume from
that s2ram. Did not tes
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #61 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-03 10:34 ---
I also have _GTF evaluation failed, using T42.
Feb 3 19:43:41 alon1 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1f.1 to 64
Feb 3 19:43:41 alon1 ata1.01: _GTF evaluation fail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #60 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-31 07:14 ---
(In reply to comment #59)
> Hm. CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE shouldn't be necessary.
In fact it wasn't, but I thought I'd be better off safe than sorry :-)
--
Configure bugmail: http:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #59 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-30 14:24 ---
Hm. CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE shouldn't be necessary.
I'm starting to think that your box's BIOS wants us to save/restore the ACPI
NVS area during hibernation, which we're not doing a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #58 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-30 13:58 ---
No problems after that.
I had to recompile with
CONFIG_PM_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE=y
and now have huge logs. Do you need any dmesg output?
--
Configure bugmail: http://b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #57 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 12:13 ---
In the configuration as per Comment #55, please do:
# echo core > /sys/power/pm_test
# echo mem > /sys/power/state
(this will test the suspend/resume sequence with busy-waiting
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #56 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 11:47 ---
Hi Rafael, I tried it, but had troubles after second time s2disk.
Any hopes for trying the -rt patch-series? And could you suggest any debugging
options that might yield useful
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #55 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-28 12:47 ---
Please apply patches from:
http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/hibernation_and_suspend/2.6.24/patches/
on top of 2.6.24 and see if that changes anything.
--
Configure bugmail: http://b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #54 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-27 23:22 ---
Now on 2.6.24, still no change. Is there anything else I might do to test? Or
should I wait for 2.6.25-rc1 and see what that brings?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ker
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #53 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-22 01:19 ---
Switched to 2.6.24-rc8, I only tested s2disk twice. Unfortunately, I still had
trouble, which occurred when resuming for the second time. I didn't test in
detail, I'll wait for
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #52 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-10 11:26 ---
Last test for today; you wrote:
> 1.) If you only do s2ram, then the problem never happens
This still holds. Opened 61 pdfs and compiled a programme while doing s2ram two
times
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #51 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-10 10:48 ---
Another test. I was able to reproduce the problem at the first time s2disk by
loading 'many' documents (21 pdfs, 3 docs in open office, 1 doc in ms-office,
crossover, kontact ko
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #50 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-10 10:22 ---
I did some further testing. First, I switched to 2.6.24-rc7, and I loaded
thinkpad_acpi without the fan_control option and without the fancontrol script.
Some results: I tested
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 13:46 ---
> > > After that the kernel works fine (no strange behaviour, slowness, ...) ?
>
> I meant to say - in general, no, but I don't tax this box very much, so I
> might
> have mis
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 13:29 ---
(In reply to comment #47)
> (In reply to comment #46)
> > After that the kernel works fine (no strange behaviour, slowness, ...) ?
I meant to say - in general, no, but I don't
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 13:26 ---
(In reply to comment #46)
> And in all cases you can continue by pressing keys - if I understand
> correctly it needs to be some special function key, right ?
No, only in the c
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 08:38 ---
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 3.) Problem goes away with one of the following command line option combos:
> > A) "nohz=off highres=off"
> > B) "hpet=d
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 08:28 ---
> 1.) If you only do s2ram, then the problem never happens
Yes. I haven't tried this with all different options, but I have noticed
anything different either.
> 2.) It's never
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 07:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=14361)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14361&action=view)
Bootlog without nolapic_timer on the cmdline; 2.6.24-rc6
--
Configure b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 07:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=14360)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14360&action=view)
Bootlog with nolapic_timer on the cmdline; 2.6.24-rc6
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 07:12 ---
> Can you please provide full boot logs with and without "nolapic_timer" on the
> kernel command line? Please add "apic=verbose" in both cases.
I try to collect the info we hav
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 06:51 ---
Can you please provide full boot logs with and without "nolapic_timer" on the
kernel command line? Please add "apic=verbose" in both cases.
Thanks,
tglx
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 05:55 ---
No problems with "nolapic_timer"!
I tested by doing s2disk, s2ram, s2ram, s2ram, s2disk, s2disk, s2disk; no
problems so far. Need any further info?
--
Configure bugmail: htt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 04:40 ---
> Hmm, I notice that the correct syntax is "hpet=disable", not "hpet=disabled"
> (with an extra "d" after disable). I assume, however, that they make no
> difference...?
No dif
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 04:22 ---
Hmm, I notice that the correct syntax is "hpet=disable", not "hpet=disabled"
(with an extra "d" after disable). I assume, however, that they make no
difference...?
--
Configu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 04:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=14358)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14358&action=view)
Contents of /proc/timer_list; 2.6.24-rc6, "hpet=disabled" on cmdline
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 04:01 ---
> Apparently I can substitute "highres=off" with "hpet=disabled".
Can you please provide the output of
# cat /proc/timer_list
with "hpet=disable" on the command line ?
Thanks
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 01:54 ---
$ cat /proc/cmdline
root=/dev/sda1 ro vga=791 printk.time=Y hpet=disabled nohz=off
$ zgrep -e NO_HZ -e HIGH_RES -e HPET /proc/config.gz
CONFIG_NO_HZ=y
CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-08 01:07 ---
> In sum: hpet=disabled did not cause major differences, except the wait
> occurring at suspend instead of resume with s2disk. By the way, I also tried
> with "hpet=disabled noh
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-07 23:50 ---
I tried with hpet=disabled (2.6.24-rc6), and I saw no big differences, save
one; This time, the wait happened at suspend instead of resume. Everything went
normal until the "s2d
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-05 04:09 ---
Can you please try "hpet=disable" on the kernel command line (with nohz &
highres active) ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Y
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-01 10:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=14246)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14246&action=view)
s2disk with errors (2.6.24-rc6; NO_HZ=y,HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y)
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-01 10:29 ---
I just tried 2.6.24-rc6. All is still fine with nohz=off highres=off on the
kernel commandline, but without this the problems still remain. I did notice
ata1.01: _GTF evaluation
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-18 00:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=14102)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14102&action=view)
First s2disk, then s2ram; 2.6.24-rc5; nohz=off highres=off; No errors
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-18 00:48 ---
For good measure I also include dmesg with s2disk and then s2ram without
problems, after three days of uptime on kernel 2.6.24-rc5, booted with nohz=off
highres=off. I haven't k
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-17 12:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=14092)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14092&action=view)
Third time s2disk - with error, interrupted with keypresses to speed thing
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-17 12:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=14091)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14091&action=view)
Second time s2disk - with error, completed uninterruptedly
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-17 12:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=14090)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14090&action=view)
First time s2disk - no errors (2.6.24-rc5; NO_HZ=y,HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y)
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-17 12:11 ---
I'm currently on 2.6.24-rc5, and booted with nohz=off, highres=off, and I've
had no problems so far (booted about three days ago, s2disk and s2ram several
times.
As I said, I
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 13:51 ---
I'm not sure if we can change the reporter, but that shouldn't matter (if you
don't mind receiving emails from the bugzilla, that is).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.k
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|REOPENED
Resolution|UNREPRODUCI
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 13:34 ---
I have to mention that my config also contained the hdaps module compiled
into the kernel (I mean statically and not as a module). And I also confirm
that I have experienced
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 13:21 ---
Rebooted with 2.6.24-rc5, nohz, highres. I could s2ram without problem for 10
times. I then suspended2disk once, also without problem. After that however,
resuming after s2ram w
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 08:03 ---
Sorry, I'm no good with bugzilla and it shows, I'm unable to reopen this bug...
How should I continue?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=emai
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 08:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=14011)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14011&action=view)
My kernel config - t43p
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 08:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=14010)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14010&action=view)
lspci for t43p
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpre
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 07:59 ---
I have a similar laptop (t43p) with similar problems; it only resumes correctly
if I boot with highres=off,nohz=off. Problems started with 2.6.21, which
produced hangs wiht nohz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-13 00:52 ---
Unfortunately I do not own the IBM laptop anymore, but on the new laptop -- a
Benq S31V -- with kernel 2.6.23.8 and almost the same configuration (including
CONFIG_HO_HZ and CON
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-12 16:34 ---
Ciprian, can you try the current mainline kernel with CONFIG_NO_HZ and
CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS unset, please?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?ta
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
65 matches
Mail list logo