Title: Message
Looking into my crystal ball.
You're using downlevel (i.e. pre-Win2k) clients, and have enabled
password complexity requirements. This was done after creating non-complex
passwords for the users.
Either disable password complexity, or reset their passwords to something
Title: Message
Ahh,
SPAM. I love it. I'll take yours!
Seriously, the only way to reduce the impact of spam on your network is
to never accept it. Content filtering works to an extent, but that requires you
to accept the mail, therefore taking the resource hit on your network. Not to
Depending on their budgets, here are a few
solutions:
If they can not spend a lot, go with open relay
filter. Starting cost is $25 for the stardard version and $99.00 for the
enterprise version. We use this with some of our smaller
clients.
http://www.vamsoft.com/orf/
If you want to add
Title: Message
Although this thread has nothing to do with AD, right now I am using
Norton Antivirus for Exchange 2000, it allows you to filter some content and
works pretty good and is included with the product. The only thing is it
scans the entire Exchange store for content and subject
Title: Message
Is
the second machine pointing to the first server for DNS?
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-From: steve
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Message
The biggest issue with Nortons
SAVF is the fact that Exchange 2K handles APIs on every message differently so
you could end up with slip throughs as far
as SPAM is concerned. (I got this info directly from Symantec since we use it
too)
We are currently in the process of
Title: Message
I'm
evaling GFI's MailEssential's and MailSecurity products as we speak. Thus
far I've only had 3 false positives and they occured because I was agressively
filtering out any pieces of mail that had remote images tagged in
them.
The
product is very stable and has 3 ways of
Title: Message
Wow.
This is like a list of reasons not to touch symantec products. fwiw i'm using
mailsweeper as a smtp gateway, filtering incoming (and outgoing) messages for
spam, viruses, other undesirable stuff and it understands that just because i
filtered "Sex" as a banned word, that
Title: Message
Another possibility is that manual mappings to shared drives were done
under an old password, and the system stored that in the registry. Disconnect
the network drives and then reconnect. We do our standard mappings in the login
script, and strongly discourage manual mappings
just wanted to pick up on others experiences of using preferences (as
opposed to true policies) in w2k gp objects.
experiencing behaviour which is at best described as inconsistent in the
application / refresh of values set in the non-standard registry hives
issues may stem from the format of
I had a similar problem and solved it by installing NetBEUI/BIOS on both servers and then tried to join the domain. It worked fine.Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the second machine pointing to the first server for DNS?
Please help. I have 3 servers, in 2 different domains that keep showing up
in DNS with both their correct ip address and an entry with ip address
192.168.234.235. I keep deleting these entries, but they keep reappearing.
There must be some significance to this ip address. Does anyone have an idea
Can you run nbtstat -a 192.168.234.235 from the command line, can you
ping the number?
-Original Message-
From: Rittenhouse, Cindy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] bogus DNS entries
Please help. I have 3 servers,
No, I can not ping it and nbtstat results host not found.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Schlegel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 13:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] bogus DNS entries
Can you run nbtstat -a 192.168.234.235 from the command line,
Sorry I don't have too much, check these links out. Maybe KB article
Q292822 could help you out.
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=292822
http://support.ap.dell.com/docs/software/smdrac3/RAC/en/readme/read33.tx
t
* Due to functional details that are specific to Windows Dynamic DNS
servers,
Sounds like you have a ghosted adapter that was setup running a private IP
address at some point and still exists in the registry. Try this:
Click Start, click Run, type cmd.exe, and then press ENTER.
Type set devmgr_show_nonpresent_devices=1, and then press ENTER.
Type Start DEVMGMT.MSC, and then
Thank you very much, this is exactly my problem, all 3 of these servers have
DRACIII cards.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Schlegel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 13:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] bogus DNS entries
Sorry I don't have too much,
also, if you are logged in on the server with a
valid id and password for the domain, and that id has permissions to add a
computer to the domain, you wont need netbeui
- Original Message -
From:
Daniel
Chaveco
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003
I actually have the same exact problem with a Dell PE server... I tried
disabling the DRAC during boot as I thought that may be the cause and that
was no help. I also tried disabling Dynamic DNS registration on that
interface after I read this KB article
Apparently, Dell has a fix for this problem on their 2650 servers. Check the
Dell Premier site for BR57110.exe.
-Original Message-
From: Wright, T. MR NSSB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 14:52
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] bogus DNS entries
I
Title: Message
Hi All,
This is about user
credentials.
1. What attributes
(if any) in the standard out-of-the-box active directory store should I looking
at if I want to know the credentials of the user logged in currently ?,
and;
2. What methods can
I use to get the values of these
I'm interested in feedback on the following OU and GPO design.
Simple OU structure, something like:
|--Branches
|--Users
|--Computers
The Users OU would hold around 5000 users and the Computers OU an equal
amount of workstations and servers.
GPO's would be created for the users
David,
We do something similar in our environment (15k computers, 25k users) with
each of our campus buildings or remote sites as a Branch as you have it
termed, with Computer sub-OU for workstations contained there, and some type
of OU for user objects. In one domain we have ~18 branches
23 matches
Mail list logo
