RE: [ActiveDir] [ActiveDir Digest]

2004-08-04 Thread Ruston, Neil
This can only be done by querying for the lastLogonTimestamp attribute across *all* DCs in your domain. In w2k this attribute's data is not replicated between DCs, but in w2k3, this data is replicated and shared between all DCs in the domain so is more readily available. Thanks, Neil MVP (AD)

RE: [ActiveDir] AD Backup - Sort of

2004-08-04 Thread Strand, Ted
Thanks for the suggestions Al, I will admit that it really makes me nervous to change replication on AD since (knock on wood) it is working so well.I have done testing in the lab for a couple of weeks now and I think I have it all worked out, I just want to feel comfortable knowing that I

[ActiveDir] Fileserver and Self-Executing Programs

2004-08-04 Thread Edwin
Within our domain, roaming profiles are used. The roaming profiles are limited to 10MB by means of a GPO. The user is also given a networked drive (K:\) that gives them an additional 40MB which gives them a grand total of 50MB of usable space when on their workstations. The 50MB limit is

[ActiveDir] AD - Authentication

2004-08-04 Thread Tashildar, Dinesh (Cognizant)
Title: AD - Authentication How do I check, which are the users (or computers) are getting authentication from domain controller. Let say If I give set command on client side, then I can get LOGONSERVER=\\CTSINPUNCFAA If I want to know from CTSINPUNCFAA (Domain controller) how many/who

RE: [ActiveDir] Fileserver and Self-Executing Programs

2004-08-04 Thread Michael Wassell
The first thing that comes to mind is disabling Windows Installer for non-managed apps via GPO, considering you are already doing something similar as you had mentioned that may be the most viable solution. Otherwise, I'm not sure if its possible or how difficult it would be to implement

RE: [ActiveDir] Fileserver and Self-Executing Programs

2004-08-04 Thread Edwin
What I have noticed, in the couple of test I have done, is that if the installer is a MSI package, it will immediately be denied any further access. If it is a *.exe then there may be progress on the installation and it is up to the *.exe on how to proceed. If a *.exe is used, the system

[ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has buggered my 2003 upgrade attempt

2004-08-04 Thread Ken Cornetet
I attempted to run adprep /forestprep in my test forest, only to have it fail with a cryptic (and misleading, as it turns out) error recorded in it's log. Googling the error text lead me to a post by a MS support guy who has written a script that will hash a schema update LDIF file against a

RE: [ActiveDir] urgent help needed

2004-08-04 Thread Alicia Szerenyi
I could recover the drive that was corrupted...now i don`t know if i should install AD again. My situation is that i don't have another server to use as a backup DC, i just have one. Is there any way i can avoid a failure because of a power loss? i read in the microsoft documentation that

RE: [ActiveDir] Fileserver and Self-Executing Programs

2004-08-04 Thread Coleman, Hunter
Software Restrictions via group policy may be an option for you. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/rstrplcy.mspx http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/windows_2003_restriction_policies_security.html Hunter From: Edwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: [ActiveDir] urgent help needed

2004-08-04 Thread Coleman, Hunter
As Eric mentioned in an earlier post, the database underlying Active Directory normally doesn't have problems recovering from a dirty shutdown. You should be able to grab an old workstation in a test lab, DC Promo it up to a domain controller, and then later unplug it without corrupting the

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has buggered my 2003 upgrade attempt

2004-08-04 Thread Eric Fleischman
For the sake of completeness can you give us the error that you're getting? That way we know what element is failing on import. Thanks! ~Eric -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 9:04 AM To:

[ActiveDir] Maximum password age

2004-08-04 Thread Cary, Mark
Title: Maximum password age In the default domain policy when the Maximum password age is set to Not defined. What is the default value for the password age?? Thanks

RE: [ActiveDir] urgent help needed

2004-08-04 Thread Alicia Szerenyi
Ok, now that i could recover the partition where the ntds.dit file was, i think i might be able to use it again...what happens if i change the registry property from WinNT back to LanmanNT?? can i do that? will that work? Thanks -Mensaje original- De: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] VPN Authentication

2004-08-04 Thread Ulf B. Simon-Weidner
Hello Devan, I've seen slow authentiaction when clients authenticate over a firewall and not all ports needed are availablr. If the W2k+ Client takes about 15 minutes then ist that issue. The client tries to log on, receives a message from the DC which also tells him that he´s in a

RE: [ActiveDir] urgent help needed

2004-08-04 Thread joe
The testing I have previously done on this failed to work, I got a license error popup when trying it. However, I believe Dean said he tried it and he didn't have an issue. I was working with an MSDN copy of Windows and he was working with an OEM copy. You can definitely try to do it. So it

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has buggered my 2003 upgrade attempt

2004-08-04 Thread Ken Cornetet
No, that's why I said the error from adprep was misleading. The add of the uid attribute silently failed, but then the add of the inetorgperson person fails because OID 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1 isn't in the schema. A little cruising in adsiedit shows a delete option for

RE: [ActiveDir] Missing enumeration for DNS Scripting

2004-08-04 Thread joe
Cute Do you have MSDN Universal access and have you looked in the Beta SDK's? I will send something to MS about it but don't expect a quick fix. joe From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. SmithSent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 11:52 AMTo: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has buggered my 2003 upgrade attempt

2004-08-04 Thread joe
Great, you have to love that! ~Eric have them fix their sheet! Here is a little article about defuncting attribs/classes so you can learn about it http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/ad/ad/disab ling_existing_classes_and_attributes.asp Unfortunately, defuncting is

RE: [ActiveDir] AD - Authentication

2004-08-04 Thread joe
Title: AD - Authentication You would need to have auditing enabled and scrape the event log. A sort of so so way to see who has a connection RIGHT NOW to the DC but not necessarily everyone who is currently logged on the network somewhere who was authenticated by that DC is to check the

RE: [ActiveDir] [ActiveDir Digest]

2004-08-04 Thread joe
lastLogonTimeStamp is a K3 attribute, in 2K you have to use lastLogon. And yes, you would have to query every DC in the domain for its lastLogon value and determine which is the most recent. joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruston,

RE: [ActiveDir] AD Backup - Sort of

2004-08-04 Thread joe
Active Directory is doing a whole ton more than what Exchange directory had to do. Being an Exchange directory is but one function. However that being said, you can export/import many of the attributes, you just have to know which ones can't be directly reimported such as GUIDs, SIDs,

RE: [ActiveDir] dsquery

2004-08-04 Thread joe
Note by default this will do computer objects, you just need to adjust the filter to do users and it does all of the work based on pwdLastSet. The switch to use would be -f (objectcategory=person)(objectclass=user) joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange 2003 dcpromo

2004-08-04 Thread joe
Honestly you shouldn't install Exchange or any back offfice products on domain controllers. Other than that I am kind of confused by your post... You demoted a machine that I take was also running Exchange and then you rebuilt it from the beginning? What does that mean, did you reload the

RE: [ActiveDir] Missing enumeration for DNS Scripting

2004-08-04 Thread joe
I just checked the Beta K3 SP1 SDK and it isn't there... Possibly you can sweet talk ~Eric into giving you the values. I have notified the MSDN folks and told them where to find the constants so they don't have to look too hard but who knows what the time frame will be. joe From:

RE: [ActiveDir] AD Backup - Sort of

2004-08-04 Thread Coleman, Hunter
Ted- I just saw this post: http://blogs.msdn.com/exchange/archive/2004/08/04/208045.aspx I haven't played with either version of ADModify, so I can't comment on whether it's easier than LDIFDE or script to do bulk mods. Maybe you can check it out in all of your spare time and report back

RE: [ActiveDir] Missing enumeration for DNS Scripting

2004-08-04 Thread Michael B. Smith
Is this in the source tree available for MVPs? I need to sign up for that... From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 1:45 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: 'Eric Fleischman'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Missing enumeration for DNS Scripting

RE: [ActiveDir] Maximum password age

2004-08-04 Thread Gilbert, Daniel L Mr ANOSC/FCBS
Title: Maximum password age I believe it is 42 days. -Original Message- From: Cary, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 8:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Maximum password age In the default domain policy when the Maximum password

RE: [ActiveDir] Maximum password age

2004-08-04 Thread joe
Title: Maximum password age If truly undefined there should be no password max age. However, if someone just undefined an existing policy it should be whatever the last policy set it as. So if I set the policy to 0, then applied that policy, then undefined the policy, it would be 0. The

RE: [ActiveDir] Missing enumeration for DNS Scripting

2004-08-04 Thread joe
Is this in the source tree available for MVPs? I can neither confirm nor deny that statement. I need to sign up for that... That is a good idea I think, you just have to be careful about what you say about it once you are in it. joe From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Missing enumeration for DNS Scripting

2004-08-04 Thread Michael B. Smith
Hmmm. Interesting point. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joeSent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 2:15 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Missing enumeration for DNS Scripting Is this in the source tree available for MVPs? I can neither confirm

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has buggered my 2003 up grade attempt

2004-08-04 Thread Mulnick, Al
Anyone have the impact that would have on SAP application by chance? Just curious really. Don't have SAP handy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 12:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Eric Fleischman'

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has buggered my 2003 up grade attempt

2004-08-04 Thread joe
I would expect it would really dork it up pretty well... However there are two compensating things. 1. SAP shouldn't have done this. Ok so that isn't really a compensating factor but they really shouldn't have! 2. He already said that they aren't using it so breaking SAP doesn't matter. Now for

RE: [ActiveDir] Changing permissions in AD

2004-08-04 Thread Mulnick, Al
Seems that's not so easy as to find an easy vbscript for it. Found some c++ for it but that doesn't sound like what you want :) How many OU's do you have? Also, what POS backup system are you deploying? I'd like stay as far away from that company as I possibly can. And since you have the

RE: [ActiveDir] AD Backup - Sort of

2004-08-04 Thread Coleman, Hunter
At least they threw you a boneKeeping with the Windows 2003 initiative that everything that can be done in the GUI should be available via command line, a command line version of the tool that contains all of the same features is included as well. From: joe

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has buggered my 2003 up grade attempt

2004-08-04 Thread Mulnick, Al
Thanks Joe, I saw that (rare for me lately). Just curious if SAP and Active Directory could play well together or not. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 3:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:

Re: [ActiveDir] Changing permissions in AD

2004-08-04 Thread Steve
There are two parts to the backup solution. The first only requires backup operator rights and does normal system level backups.restores and non AD level file recovery. No issues there. The additonal rights come from their method of dealing with AD and restoring individual objects in AD.

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has buggered my 2003 up grade attempt

2004-08-04 Thread joe
Well side by side we see: MS UID dn: CN=uid,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=X changetype: ntdsSchemaAdd objectClass: attributeSchema ldapDisplayName: uid adminDisplayName: uid adminDescription: A user ID. attributeId: 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1 attributeSyntax: 2.5.5.12 omSyntax: 64 isSingleValued:

RE: [ActiveDir] Changing permissions in AD

2004-08-04 Thread Mulnick, Al
What was the name of that product? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 3:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Changing permissions in AD There are two parts to the backup solution. The

RE: [ActiveDir] Changing permissions in AD

2004-08-04 Thread joe
I will assume you have a K3 Domain... It is going to need administrator level rights (not domain admin) just to look into the deleted items container unless the ACL's have been relaxed like Tony was asking about the other day here on the list. However this should be handled in such a way that

RE: [ActiveDir] Missing enumeration for DNS Scripting

2004-08-04 Thread Eric Fleischman
Im not sure I understand the question. Which enum are you looking for? That page specifies the values for the ins. What am I not seeing that youre looking for? From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 12:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Eric

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has buggered my 2003 upgrade attempt

2004-08-04 Thread Eric Fleischman
So long as it works (IE the dsa lets you do it w/o any magical tricks) I see no problem with this approach. If you have a test lab, that's a great place to try it first. :) But at first glance it looks like it should work. ~Eric -Original Message- From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has buggered my 2003 upgrade attempt

2004-08-04 Thread Ken Cornetet
Thanks Joe Eric! Worked like a charm. Adprep ran to completion for forestprep and domainprep. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fleischman Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 4:24 PM To: joe; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]

RE: [ActiveDir] Missing enumeration for DNS Scripting

2004-08-04 Thread Michael B. Smith
Uh, not at least on the public page. SecureSecondaries [in] Specifies the security to be applied and must be one of the following: ZONE_SECSECURE_NO_SECURITY ZONE_SECSECURE_NS_ONLY ZONE_SECSECURE_LIST_ONLY ZONE_SECSECURE_NO_XFR What are the numeric values of

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has buggered my 2003 upgrade attempt

2004-08-04 Thread joe
I am really good at guessing... :oP Glad it worked out for you. joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 5:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Gurus needed - SAP has buggered my 2003 up grade attempt

2004-08-04 Thread Ayers, Diane
Ken: Do you recall which version of the SAP portal it was that made the schema changes? I'm asking since we are testing the SAP portal against AD in our lab with our SAP folks. I know that the initial version that they came to us with required a schema change (version 5?) and before we got it

[ActiveDir] Active Directory Replication as it pertains to DNS

2004-08-04 Thread Steve
This is a learning question. Nothing is broken but I want to know where some information is located. How can I tell and where do I go to find out what information is replicated in Active Directory at the DNS zone level itself. For example, if you create a new zone in AD, all the contents of the