oblem:
The "Log On To" setting in the user object seems to be limited to 64 NetBIOS
names and 1024 bytes of information.
Does anyone have any ideas? I'm sure I've just overlooked something basic.
Thank you in advance for your comments and suggestions.
David Aragon
List inf
27;s a different
issue for another time.
Thank you again for the suggestions, they are
appreciated.
David Aragon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Za
VueSent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 10:11 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [A
d
while I can't speak for others, I for one would be very interested to get a copy
of the tool/script you described.
Thank
you for the assistance.
David Aragon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 3:50 PMT
ht it was much more difficult to simulate the campus
network. The workstations are serviced by a RIS server so when (not if) a
student screws a system up in the lab we can reload it fairly
quickly.
In any case, again, thank
you everyone for all the good input.
David Aragon
Thanks Joe, very nice and fast.
David Aragon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent: Friday, November 04, 2005 9:29 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Limiting User
Logon to Specific Machines
http
Directory (EA's, DA's, OU Admins,
Techs, etc)? Anything published in the last couple of years would be
useful.
Thank you in advance.
David Aragon
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
documents you sighted were good reads and I think will provide
useful ammo for my upcoming fight.
I think together all this information will assist me in making a better case
for getting the staffing I need.
Again thank you all.
David Aragon
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PRO
Second, is the "lockoutTime" the setting I need to monitor or is there some
other place I need to look? Third, how do I get the tools to report the
same information or should I consider certain tools suspect?
David Aragon
as sort of
"early warning" for when one or more accounts are under attack (we are a
university and suffer attacks, usually from students, almost weekly and just
before finals we get multiple attacks daily).
David Aragon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PRO
group tell me the differences between these attributes
and which would be the correct one to use for the stated purposes?
David Aragon
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
Thank you Tony and Paul. This is why I think so many people are on this
list. The information provided is good, useful, and to the point.
David Aragon
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray
> Sent: Tuesday, Aug
useful to
set for a number of reasons (for example it will prevent a user from logging
into a system, but not prevent them from getting their voicemail).
Is this normal? Can it be set and if so, how? Is it dependent on other
settings (ex. lockoutTime) to be set to remain set?
David Aragon
List
Thank you Tomasz for the clarification on UAC. If I understand you, then if
the lockoutTime were set to some non-0 value (a time say in the next year?
or last year?) this would trigger the lockout bit to be set. The
presumption being that the lockoutTime can be set.
David Aragon
be set directly, but that by
setting the lockoutTime to some non-zero value the account is locked (though
I've found that the bit is not always set). My current research and
testing is moving along that path.
David Aragon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
ampus or on campus), etc.
This is still the path I'm pursuing.
David
Aragon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier,
GuidoSent: Monday, August 21, 2006 10:53 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] UAC
Quest
ining.
David Aragon
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 3:19 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] UAC Question
>
> Yeah I was thinking about forci
You helped turn a dead end path into a multilane
road. We shall see where it takes us.
David Aragon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al
MulnickSent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 6:22 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] UAC
Que
Steve, if that offer is still good, I would like to get a copy also.
David Aragon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 1:31 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir
I would also like to see the additional information exposed by installing
acctinfo.dll be made standard (built-in) rather than by having to install an
additional dll and the information it exposes be viewable on the user object
when that user is found via a search.
David Aragon
Your ability to
Have you tried:
(&(objectCategory=Person)(objClass=User)(displayName=\\
))
David AragonYour ability to perceive a solution is
limitedonly by your understanding of the problem
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sitton Glen
ESent: Tuesday, Febru
appear in any
of our test setups, however all our production DC's exhibit the behavior.
Does anyone have any suggestions or ideas?
David Aragon
Event Type: Error
Event Source: Service Control Manager
Event Category: None
Event ID: 7023
Date: 8/23/2005
Time: 3
le to reboot any
of the DC's for several more hours.
David Aragon
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 6:02 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [Activ
Are you a member of the "Offer Remote Assistance Helpers" group on the
system your trying to offer RA to (this can be done via GPO
setting)?
David Aragon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
GuestSent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006
to join them to the Domain.
David Aragon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah
EigerSent: Friday, April 08, 2005 2:23 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] Netdom to
Join
Hi –
What are the minimum credentials
th
000/server/reskit/en-us/distrib/dsbi_add_qqne.asp).
David Aragon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah
EigerSent: Friday, April 08, 2005 8:04 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Netdom to
Join
Thanks for the
response
your
describing, a few techs that can't seem to follow even the simplest
instruction set, but in the long run pre-creation actually saves time and
energy.
David Aragon
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Bruyere, Mi
26 matches
Mail list logo
