Hi
This is not just an ADAM problem it's been a problem with LDAP
directories for some time now and was discussed in the LDAPbis WG.
As a result if you look at RFC4513(RFC2829 is obsolete) you will
see this issue is now addressed by making a distinction between an
anonymous authentication and
cnvals[0] = location;
I think that needs to agree with your ou name
i.e.
cnvals[0] = test;
Lee Flight
List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
For reference there is also a summary of of the Windows 2003
schema modifications at:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/adschema/adschema/windows_server_2003_only_schema.asp
Lee Flight
Network Support, Computer Centre
University of Leicester
List info :
In fact there is an LDIF file for SMS2003, it's buried in the
SMS2003 Toolkit:
http://www.microsoft.com/smserver/downloads/2003/tools/toolkit.asp
Unfortunately the SMS2003 Active Directory Schema Modification and Publishing for
Systems Management Server 2003 documentation at:
Hi,
when the procedure starts to fail what do you see in the target DC
audit trail: Account Logon | Account Management. Have you tried auditing
Directory Services Access failures (KB232714)?
Does the problem persist if you (are able) to switch to
OpenDSObject(WinNT://
as a test?
Does the
When we were moving roles around recently for Windows 2003
upgrade we scripted:
netdom query /server:dcname fmso
to check consistency. As some roles are stored as attributes
on the schema and configuration containers changes (KB 223787)
may take longer to replicate than those stored as
Maybe there's a little more to it, in light of the the SSO
scalability paper at:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/howitworks/activedirectory/adscaltest.asp
and the latest info. on TrustBridge:
http://www.microsoft.com/usa/presentations/Hur_SecuritySummitWest03.ppt
Further
The Exchange 2000 schema extensions can lead to managled attributes when
the W2003 schema updates take place wrt. the InetOrgPerson in W2003 see
KB 314649 and KB 325379. Those two articles are not entirely consistent but
the InetOrgPersonPrevent.ldf in KB 325379 (updated 06/20/2003) is the one
Hi,
the windows-hied list (there is a link from http://windows.stanford.edu)
discusses these issues for hied. There is an archive at:
http://admin.ufl.edu/windows/discussions/windows-hied/
search in the subject for OU design.
Empty root is certainly a design option but I do not believe
that
If you are convinced that the policy change is active
and replicating, you could try checking to see if the user
policy has been tatoo'ed with the (old) redirection settings.
KB article 242557 describes the keys. Beyond that debug the GPO
application (KB article 250842)
Lee Flight
Network
Hi,
If you want to do inter-AD forest testing:
Microsoft Metadirectory Services 2003, Standard Edition, will ship
approximately 90 days after the Windows .NET Server release (1Q03).
Standard edition will be made available as a no-charge web download.
From:
11 matches
Mail list logo