Title: OT: Tivoli
Thanks Larry! That'll do nicely. As for not furthering the cause, I'm with ya brother. Not my choice, but I can only salute and move on. Eric, thanks as well. I just wish we were using framework 4.1 instead of 3.7. *sigh*
John A. Bjelke
Unisys
505.853.6774
[EMAIL
:
|
| Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Tivoli
]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:
Tivoli
As much as I hate to
further the cause:
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/portals/TivoliCustom1
-Original
Message-From: Bjelke John
A Contr AFRL/VSIO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14,
2003 10:38
AMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED
But, at what cost?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Tivoli
Here ya' go. You will probably enjoy managing with Tivoli's current
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Flesher
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Tivoli
It's funny you ask that question. We are in the midst of figuring out what
the cost
:
|
| Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Tivoli
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Tivoli
Funny...we heard nearly the exact same comments about JD Edwards
Wasn't true of course...but the comments were the same :D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Tivoli
Tivoli today is not nearly as horrible on the Windows Server Platform as it
may have been
-Original Message-
From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Tivoli
I've talked with folks over the years who have tried to implement Tivoli
100%. 100% doesn't seem attainable. Tivoli implementations