IS different for
each company
Cheers
#JORGE#
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: 5/22/2005 7:05 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
1.
I assume almost everyone has an insurance policy for their house if it
burns
,
Guido
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mike kline
Sent: Montag, 23. Mai 2005 13:38
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
haha, ok so you MVPs also have these special powers.
Very
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
oh, gee, I'm too late - but I had a great weekend ;-))
I'd have to say (and all the posts show themselves) that there is no single
right or wrong answers to lag sites. It's one building block to mastering AD
DR and may very
and rebuild the DC
from scratch
Cheers,
#JORGE#
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: 5/22/2005 1:15 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Reread it Deji, I really am not agreeing with it. I noted that it might
be
something
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge de Almeida
Pinto
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 5:41 AM
To: 'joe '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '; 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org '
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Hi,
In my opinion
purpose?
joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Holme
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 9:49 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
I think Jorge summarized the issue quite well
#JORGE#
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: 5/22/2005 7:05 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
1.
I assume almost everyone has an insurance policy for their house if it
burns down.
In the US, you can't get
of joe
Sent: Fri 5/20/2005 10:07 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
I would tend to agree with what David is saying from what I have seen of lag
sites as well.
Not many people, relatively, doing it, those that are are likely to be doing
I read Joe's comments as not creating a lag site per-se, but using virtual
DC's which are periodically saved (I'll refrain from saying backed up since
it's not a backup, as was recently discussed) in order to perform a
Forest-wide recovery. I don't think he was referring to recovery of a few
/willhack4food
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 3:49 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Todd,
With all due respect, I think there are more people doing
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Thanks Rick,
I didn't think it to strong. And took no offense.
As most of you know, I am a buy guy.
When I reviewed AD back when, I new that we were in trouble if we had any accidents with administration. We allow for delegated
-Original Message-
From: David Adner
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Sent: 5/21/2005 5:08 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
I read Joe's comments as not creating a lag site per-se, but using
virtual
DC's which are periodically saved (I'll refrain from saying
, 2005 3:45 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Joe, you pretty much agreed with the lag site proposition towards the end of
your piece. Whether you virtualize it, put it is a different physical
location or just put it on a piece
Correct.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 5:08 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
I read Joe's comments as not creating a lag site per
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Holme
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 16:16
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Two more notes on this issue:
1) THIRD PARTY AD RESTORE TOOLS. Sounds like it's clear, now, WHY lag sites
are so popular. Yes
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 5/19/2005 11:12 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy not?
Todd -
I personally don't have a problem with Recovery Manager.
That being said - Last I checked, Microsoft still didn't allow it as a
SUPPORTABLE solution
:16 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Two more notes on this issue:
1) THIRD PARTY AD RESTORE TOOLS. Sounds like it's clear, now, WHY lag sites
are so popular. Yes, there are third party products (particularly Quest
Recovery
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 5/19/2005 10:16 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Two more notes on this issue:
1) THIRD PARTY AD RESTORE TOOLS. Sounds like it's clear, now, WHY lag sites
are so popular. Yes, there are third party
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd
(NIH/CC/DNA)
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 11:51 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy not?
Disagree Rick,
MS changed the verbiage in the Q
@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
I disagree that Lag sites are popular, maybe with you and at AD conferences
as a session. I tend to avoid those sessions.
To all those considering this as a viable solution, why
_
From: Dan Holme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 5/19/2005 10:16 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Two more notes on this issue:
1) THIRD PARTY AD RESTORE TOOLS. Sounds like it's clear, now, WHY lag sites
are so
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Todd,
With all due respect, I think there are more people doing
this than you think. You arent using a Lag Site, so its
whacky. Your opinion, so youre entitled to it.
PSS blessed our implementation, BTW. If youd
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd
(NIH/CC/DNA)
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 11:51 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy not?
Disagree Rick,
MS changed
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge de Almeida
Pinto
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 8:43 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
You are correct there are free tools to do a restore of objects
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 5:24 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy?
Using my non-scientific personal observations, of the last 50 or so
customers I've been to I believe only 3 had lag sites
Is it cheaper and more efficient to go the replication lag site route than
buy a proper backup and object level restore solution?
I mean not to toot a vendor's horn, but Quest recovery manager turns the
process of restoring objects into a 15 minute click click operation. I
would hate to think
this earlier, and it's a good note!
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd
(NIH/CC/DNA)
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 6:34 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy
or intensive to use.
But, that's just me.
-rtk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd
(NIH/CC/DNA)
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 8:34 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DR - replication lag siteWhy
28 matches
Mail list logo
