which one came out first
chronologically?
From: Jon Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:03
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] SP4
question
I have heard mixed opinions on
whether or not installing Win2k SP4 breaks the MS03-026 patch.
DirectoryAssociate ExpertExpert Zone -
www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon
Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/USSent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:00
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
SP4 question
SP4 was released first. I ran a test
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
question
SP4 DOES NOT reintroduce the
vulnerability.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick
KingslanSent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:02 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
question
Given
:20 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
question
Rod,
With all due respect, did I somehow indicate
otherwise? If Imiscommunicated the message, I'd appreciate guidance
on how to better answer a question of this type.
-rtk
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
]
cc
Subject
RE: [ActiveDir] SP4 question
John,
Show him the statement from TruSecure.
Microsoft is not going to repond to it, as they denied that it was
a problem from day one. Russ so much as sadmits this and the problem
is now history. If your boss will not accept Russ
Jon, if you wouldn't mind, send your TAM's
nameoffline.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon
Hicks/MIS/HQ/KEMET/USSent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:33
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir]
SP4 question
I agree completely. It is funny,
after I
AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4
question
:) Sorry...I only highlighted the words because
that's the statement from MS, and to thumbtack the issue. It caught my eye
only after your post, but I was responding to the general
thread.
I've seen this issue floating around due
