Re: @author tags

2007-03-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree as well. There's something a little nice about @author tags as a way of giving credit to the people who aren't the obvious people on a project. But they're rarely kept up to date, and the implication of ownership is not very OSS-friendly. -- Adam On 2/26/07

Re: @author tags

2007-03-01 Thread Mike Kienenberger
There's already a system in place that tracks the changes and who made them. It's called svn :-) It's going to be far more accurate and complete than a system you maintain manually :-) On 2/28/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm +0 about it. I think it's nice to know who wrote a

Re: @author tags

2007-03-01 Thread Adam Winer
We should be including the name of the patch author in every checkin message. I used to be in that habit, got out of it, and I'm trying to do a better job with it lately. -- Adam On 3/1/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not exactly, SVN show only the name of the commiter, not the

Re: @author tags

2007-03-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
also, the contrib. file, martin proposed is a good thing -M On 3/2/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We should be including the name of the patch author in every checkin message. I used to be in that habit, got out of it, and I'm trying to do a better job with it lately. -- Adam On

Re: @author tags

2007-02-28 Thread Adam Winer
I agree as well. There's something a little nice about @author tags as a way of giving credit to the people who aren't the obvious people on a project. But they're rarely kept up to date, and the implication of ownership is not very OSS-friendly. -- Adam On 2/26/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL

Re: @author tags

2007-02-28 Thread Simon Lessard
) will have the patience to keep such a thing up-to-date, hence the +0. On 2/28/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree as well. There's something a little nice about @author tags as a way of giving credit to the people who aren't the obvious people on a project. But they're rarely kept up

Re: @author tags

2007-02-26 Thread Matt Cooper
] wrote: moved discussion to dev, since this is a *public* topic -M On 2/25/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi PPMC fellows, I'd like to plan to remove the @author tags in the code, since these aren't a good practice. For instance, when the @author tags belong to committers

Re: @author tags

2007-02-26 Thread Craig McClanahan
, not whoever wrote the code in the first place. I am strongly i+1 on removing @author tags, for the community related reasons that have been previously published. Craig McClanahan

Re: @author tags

2007-02-26 Thread Matt Cooper
brought up on the same discussion, which I also started over in MyFaces land snip As to why, Greg Stein sums it up well here: * http://tinyurl.com/mw7t6 This issues has been discussed at length on the board and member lists, and the ASF does prefer that our code be free of author tags, but we leave

Re: @author tags

2007-02-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
, and the ASF does prefer that our code be free of author tags, but we leave the final determination to the individual PMCs. /snip -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: @author tags

2007-02-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
land snip As to why, Greg Stein sums it up well here: * http://tinyurl.com/mw7t6 This issues has been discussed at length on the board and member lists, and the ASF does prefer that our code be free of author tags, but we leave the final determination to the individual PMCs. /snip

Re: @author tags

2007-02-26 Thread Scott O'Bryan
://tinyurl.com/mw7t6 This issues has been discussed at length on the board and member lists, and the ASF does prefer that our code be free of author tags, but we leave the final determination to the individual PMCs. /snip