Amrhar,
We just got TDP running today, and had a similar problem..
Did you follow the "recommendations" and define a new node in TSM for the
TDP session? (you indicated you had TDPO_NODE=enterprise2 on your RMAN
command)... if so, you need to set the TDPO_NODE environment variable and
run the "
Stan,
I went through that several times in disaster recovery testing... finally
got it working. What you need to do is edit your devconfig.lst file (if
you make several copies in different locations, make sure you edit the one
in the TSM server "bin" directory), and look for a line like this:
/
The BMR Server should work just fine on the Sun Blade.
Palmadesso Jack wrote:
> If you are speaking about budgets then I hear you. Then again I am
> wondering what the minimum requirements are. Sun makes these new machines
> called Blades. Some are as cheap as 1300usd and perform similar an U
It will - in early August the next version of BMR will be
released and will support Windows 2000.
Rob Schroeder wrote:
> Does BMR support Win2000?
>
> Rob
> Famous Footwear
begin:vcard
n:Schafer;Ray
tel;cell:+1 (512) 426-3188
tel;fax:+1 (512) 433-3200
tel;work:+1 (512) 433-3345
x-mozilla-html:
How can I put this.
The total package cost us in excess of 60Kusd. Even an extra 10usd over that
will make eyebrows rise.
I am quite aware that there are cheap machines, and I'v actually considered
that option, but I am still left in a situation where I have to explain why
it is that I didn'
Hi,
export all data in AIX and import in OS/390. After use dsmserv upgrade db.
Manoel Braz
Palmadesso Jack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EMENS.COM> cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Di
It appears to me that there is a large amount of Y2K backup data being stored, not
only in the TSM environment but for just about everything.
My guess is prior to Y2K, the powers that be set a long retention policy based on the
risk of post Y2K litigation.
Gifted with hind-sight, the apocaly
Windows 2K TSM Server V 4.1.2; same for the client.
We've mapped the NAS drive but we're having trouble backing it up. We can
see the network drive in the GUI, but we can't back up the files. We're
being told that the files are open by another process: ANS4987E. I'm
thinking permissions, but c
Sounds like it could be NTFS permissions problem.
Does the account used by the scheduler service (system by default) have
rights to the drive?
Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg
-Original Message-
From: Sam Schrage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PR
check what you have set for the domain statement in your dsm.opt file. That
lists all drives that will be backed up. It should be all-local but could be
hard coded.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Sam Schrage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 5:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTEC
Check also that the account your scheduler service is running under has
permission to backup this drive.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jeff Rankin
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 4:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Not backing
Have you checked the DOMAIN statement in your dsm.opt file to see if it
has the D: drive listed? That'd be one place to check. Also, if your
client is using client option sets and has the domain set there, you
might check to see if the D: drive is included in the option set.
--
Jeff Rankin
[EMA
I have an NT client that is not backup up the D drive. We can manually do
the incremental but it will not do it when we start the scheduler. When
the client looks in the dsmsched.log it shows it backing up the C drive and
then skipping to the F drive. We have tried an INCLUDE...no luck. Any
i
Hello *SMer's,
Does anyone know if there is a TDP for Sybase forthcoming? Are there any
decent solutions out there for Sybase databases, other than BMC
SQL-Backtrack & OBSI?
Thanks in advance for your input!
Greg Tice
Stan,
I have minimal experience with 3590 B11's. If this is what you
have, you may want to verify the volumes in the library are correctly
reflected in the devconfg.file. It shoud look something like the following:
DEFINE DEVCLASS 3590_CLASS DEVTYPE=3590 FORMAT=DRIVE
MOUNTLIMIT=DRIVES
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Jeff Bach wrote:
> Did the microcode level PGA3 address the LTO performance issues?
Apparently not. I had a space reclamation run all day yesterday, and
today a move data process that's moved about 4 gigs, tape to tape, in only
7 hours!!! The 1550 (aka PGA3) microcode does
hi,
>allocate channel t1 type 'sbt_tape' parms 'ENV=(DSMO_AVG_SIZE=1000,
>DSMI_ORC_CONFIG=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin/dsm.sys,
>DSMI_LOG=/home/gpfadm/backup,DSMO_NODE=entreprise2)';
I don't know why the error log said password file cannot be read.
According to you it's there. The on
>I can see where a full-function GUI client may take them
>a little time to complete, but the underlying API of MacOS X is BSD
>Unix. I'd expect a command line only client would be easy enough to port
>at least on an unsupported basis to accommodate the early adopters.
There isn't a FreeBSD clien
Formally by Sterling Software, SAMS: Vantage.
Now called CA-Vantage, TSM Interface by CA. Computer Associates recently
acquired Sterling.
Here is the link:
http://www.cai.com/products/sams/ca_vantage_tsm.htm
-Original Message-
From: Ben Nuval [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May
Did the microcode level PGA3 address the LTO performance issues?
Jeff Bach
Home Office Open Systems Engineering
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL
-Original Message-
From: Rejean Larivee/Quebec/IBM [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 20
Well... I'm not exactly dismayed that we announced the pre-installation
sooner than originally planned. ;-)
I *am*, however, dismayed that Tivoli hasn't mentioned one word about
this platform. I can see where a full-function GUI client may take them
a little time to complete, but the underlying A
Jeff,
I have my recovery log setup on a volume that is raid-5 (local SSA disk on
the TSM/AIX server). In TSM, I have it mirrored to two separate volumes
(both raid-5, one is local SSA disk on the TSM/AIX server, one is on the
Shark). That probably adds a little overhead, but I doubt that I'll l
We recently upgraded the TSM client software on four Linux systems
from 3.7 to 4.1.2.0. One of the four has preschedulecmd and
postschedulecmd options specified. Scheduled backups of this system
are occasionally hanging after backing up new and changed files but
before running the command specifie
Has anyone tested to see what the best setup for the ADSM recovery log is.
Most of the time I has seen it on a single disk drive and mirrored to
another. Has anyone tested other setups?
Jeff Bach
Home Office Open Systems Engineering
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL
***
BMR looks like a decent product, but the one thing that I didn't see
any mention of in the product documentation is what happens if you have
a total data center disaster? Everything assumes that you have the BMR
server on the network and working correctly, but in a data center
disaster that serve
Also in the FAQ, I noticed that is does not *yet* support restoring to
dissimiliar hardware. Considering that a true Disaster Recovery will
probably take place in slightly different systems, I find it a little odd
the BMR still doesn't support that yet. The hardest thing to do is restore
NT machin
I didn't have too much of a problem installing TDP 3.1 for SAP R/3 but we've
definitely discovered its performance problems. We are hoping 3.2 due out
the end of June fixes everything.
Have you had it fail utterly yet? This past long weekend (for Canada) it
received "ANS1017E (RC-50) Session r
> Hi Steven
>
> some one posted a workaround some days ago : remove /etc/adsm and try again
Thanks. I removed that directory, and rebuilt it, and it stopped the
segfault under 2.6, but I still get the when I should be asked to select
the restore destination:
X Error of failed request: BadWind
Patrick, I had encountered the same thing. I changed Z:\*.* to Z:*.* and
then my subdirectories were included.
John
==
John M. Clement |
Data Processing Analyst III | PHONE: 309/438-7254
Illinoi
Mahesh,
I'm not sure if this will help, but we had some problems getting TSM to recognize and
execute out incl/excl statements correctly in the NetWare enivronment. Tivoli tech
suppor recommended that we use full paths in our incl/excl statements. Here's a
sample of the statements we are usi
I am trying to get the Web Client to work on a NetWare 5.1 file server.
I have added these statements to my DSM.OPT file:
NWPWFILE YES
passwordaccess generate
I then issued these commands from the command line on the NetWare Client:
dsmc q session
dsmc q tsa
dsmc q tsa nds
After each of these,
I have recently set up an ADIC Scalar LTO100 on Windows NT 4 Sp6, which emulates an
IBM3583.
My question is related to tape to tape operations, as all other areas are performing
satisfactorily, according to NIC spec...
We are seeing very poor BACKUP STGPOOL throughput (1mb/sec???)
My config i
I wonder if something like this would work:
exclude.dir *
include \thedirsyouwant\*
Something to try anyway.
Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs CO 80949-1313
(719) 531-5926
Fax: (240) 539-7175
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol
This is how we connect our LTO drives to our SAN...
Equipment involved:
IBM 2108-R03 SAN Data Gateway Routers (3)
IBM 3584 LTO Ultrium Ultra-Scalable Tape Library (1 library w/5 SCSI drives)
McData ED-5000 Director Class Fibre Channel Switch (1)
IBM 2105 Enterprise Storage Server "Shark" (1)
IBM
Someone pointed TKG's product out a few months ago to me, and I looked at their
site. If you read the FAQ carefully, you'll see that you will need one server
for every type of system you need to restore. So if want BMR capability for both
Solaris, AIX, and NT, then you'll need a Solaris, AIX, and
>I'm doing a selective scheduled backup with this as the settings for the
>drive
>
>Z:\*.*
>
>-su=yes
>
>Why doesn't it backup the files in the subdirectories?
Ostensibly because the filenames are not of the form *.* .
Your log shows the successful backup of some files, and they
are of that two-p
Are you excluding the directories or filespaces you don't want with a "
exclude.fs or exclude.dir"?
If not, use them. The regular exclude inspects files.
Jeff Bach
Home Office Open Systems Engineering
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL
-Original Message-
From
So get rid of the .*. * is better. It means everything, even .* files.
*&())_)@_!...
Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs CO 80949-1313
(719) 531-5926
Fax: (240) 539-7175
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com
www.storserver.com
>...The INCLUDE/EXCLUDE
>correctly limits the data backed up to the desired 3 sub directories but
>they are inspecting everything.
You didn't reveal what your Include/Exclude coding was, but apparently
you are not using EXCLUDE.DIR, which will preclude descending into
directories if you have the
We strongly agree. MAC is making a strong comeback on campus, and the OS X
question will be frequently asked here.
At 09:57 AM 5/22/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Much to my dismay, Apple announced yesterday at the start of the
>WWDC that they would start shipping all new Macs with OS X along
>with OS
Hi all,
We are testing the use of SUBFILE backups. We have many users that
want to backup their laptops over the phone system. The nature of the work
has them initiating the backup with the client GUI. The INCLUDE/EXCLUDE
correctly limits the data backed up to the desired 3 sub directo
Yes, I saw this a few days ago. Don't know what it is offhand, it is indeed working
the opposite of what it is supposed to. Do you have any Client OPtions set for this
node? What verions of *SM are you runing? What version of NW (5.0, 5.1)? Do you
have any other NW clients?
Perhaps show
Hello ,
1. you need supported scsi adapter - LTO is produced in two versions - LVD
and HVD -
FC 6204 HVD Ult (PCI)
FC 6207 HVD Ult (PCI)
FC 6205 LVD Ult2 (PCI)
Integrated LVD
are supported on AIX
2. you need upgrade your TSM to minimum 3.7.4 version
3. install device driver for
Mahesh,
If i recall, there was not LTO support in 3.7.0.0. I believe i had to
upgrade to 3.7.4.0 to get LTO support. But the update is available on
Tivoli's site, and is a pretty painless update.
To get the drives defined in AIX, again you may have to have a recent
version of the Atape.driver
I believe you can only use the "B" (Blue tab) format tapes as the B12 can't use C
tapes. As this is apparently on one system you need to have tapes that are compatible
with all drives.
B format capacity is 5GB uncompressesd and 15GB compressed (3:1 compression).
David B. Longo
System Admin
try
-subdir=yes
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Sheehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 10:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: subdirectories
I'm doing a selective scheduled backup with this as the settings for the
drive
Z:\*.*
-su=yes
Why doesn't it backup
I'm doing a selective scheduled backup with this as the settings for the
drive
Z:\*.*
-su=yes
Why doesn't it backup the files in the subdirectories? The include/exclude
file has the default settings, I've added nothing.
05/21/2001 20:12:07 Selective Backup function invoked.
05/21/2001 20:12
I had posted this a few days ago, but I am not sure if anyone got it (my
Internet email gateway has not been behaving) . . .
Hello, all!
I have a clarification question about include/exclude statements. One of
our Netware guru's pointed this out to me. Here's what I have (NetWare 5)
in my dsm
Hello, all!
Would someone be willing to share how I can setup one of these libraries
on TSM? I am on a VERY short timeline to get this library attached to a
production 3466 Network Storage Manager (which has an AIX 4.3.2 H50).
This will be the second tape library, the first one being a 3575-L32.
If you are speaking about budgets then I hear you. Then again I am
wondering what the minimum requirements are. Sun makes these new machines
called Blades. Some are as cheap as 1300usd and perform similar an Ultra60.
We are trying a few of them out now. That wouldn't be such a large
investment
Hi
Could someone explain how access to LTO tape drives is handled by TSM 4.1
(on a AIX server) in a SAN environment ??
Library Sharing is an option but this feature is only available for NT and
SUN servers, isn't it !!??
How can we prevent TSM clients using drives already in use by other clie
Yes, so I understood, but with the amount of money we have already invested
in the system, and with the fact that our dealers and integrators forgot to
explain this issue untill yesterday (3 months after the initiall
installation etc), I cannot now go and explain that I need a second server
for BM
I haven't actually purchased the product yet, but I've been looking at it.
I've been told that BMR can run on the same server as TSM, as long as it's a
Unix server. Good Luck!
Thank you,
Jeff Caffey
Enterprise Systems Programmer
(AIX & Storage Administrator)
Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information
Much to my dismay, Apple announced yesterday at the start of the
WWDC that they would start shipping all new Macs with OS X along
with OS 9.1 as of yesterday. They will dual boot 9.1 and X, but
I'm sure the pressure to go to OS X will be strong.
We're getting more and more Macs and I can't back t
Hi Steven
some one posted a workaround some days ago : remove /etc/adsm and try again
rv
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Steven P Roder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoyé : mardi 22 mai 2001 15:56
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : 4.1.2.0 on Solaris 2.6/2.7
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Has a
Hi All,
Has anyone successfully used the GUI tool, DSM, of the 4.1.2.0 client
under Solaris 2.6 or 2.7? Under my test 2.6 machine here, the segfaults
right away, and under 2.7, it dies when changing windows, somtimes when it
needs to ask for the destination, and sometimes after selecting th
The wording is a bit hard to understand but I believe that the BMR server
itself is a separate server and requires Unix. BMR does not care what the
TSM server is itself. Check the FAQ out on their site.
http://www.tkg.com/bmr/tsm
This looks promising!
-Original Message-
From: Mike Glas
Hi *SMer's,
Server 3.7 on OS/390,
Client 3.7 on AIX.
I tried to do a backup image of a filesystem, but it won't start.
If I define mode=incremental I get the Message: ANS1074I *** User Abort ***
Ok, I think this happens because there is noch full backup of the filesystem.
When I define mode=
Ray,
Do you have some idea when you will have BRM that will work when the TSM
server is an NT server ?
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Schafer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: â îàé 22 2001 15:13
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: bare metal restore for NT...
>
> Thank
Ray,
The terminolagy then is wrong as per what they explained, but I am still
left in a situation when I need an additional UNIX based machine for the BMR
main server.
Do you have plans to bring out a version that sits on an NT machine, so that
I will not need to include another OS in my backup
Does BMR support Win2000?
Rob
Famous Footwear
Mike,
This is NOT true. While it is true that the Bare Metal Restore Main Server must
sit on a UNIX machine (AIX, Solaris, or HP), it does not matter to BMR what type
of platform is used for the TSM server - so long as TCP/IP communications are
used between the BMR Server and the TSM server, and
Thank you, Jack. While we do offer BMR, The Kernel Group is an independent
software vendor that has numerous relationships with IBM/Tivoli. In this
particular case, our Bare Metal Restore product is re-marketed by IBM/Tivoli to
extend the recovery capabilities TSM currently has with the system
>Does anyone know if the server to server communication uses a dedicated port?
Peter - The Define Server command provides HLAddress and LLAddress to specify
the IP address and port number of the server. The port number
otherwise is the same as the usual TCPPort server option value.
R
Opps! Cross platform database migration cannot be done. Your db has to be
moved to the same platform. There are some older posts about this in the
listserv archives. www.adsm.org
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Ilja G. Coolen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 7:48
Hi there,
In our test-shop we are trying to migrate our ADSM 3.1.2.90 database (on AIX
4.3.3 - IBM S70 server) to TSM 4.1 (on OS/390 v2.9). Both servers are using
3590-E drives. We are experiencing problems however. This is probably a
configuration error on OS/390. But before we continue, we woul
Thomas,
That is how it is for TDP for SQL V2 and
TDP for Exchange V2. I am not sure about Oracle.
To get a definitive answer talk with your
IBM/Tivoli representative.
Thanks,
Del
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It's a beau
Herfried,
"agent.lic" is the file you want.
Thanks,
Del
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It's a beautiful day. Don't let it get away." -- Bono
Herfried Abel
cc:
Hello dear *SMers,
I do have a little question about my select statement. I am executing SAP R/3
backups with the TDP 3.1 agent. Everything works just fine until now. To
complete the nice picture I would like to combine the backups with a daily
report of the amount of data being backed up. In fac
Just need a bit of re-assurance.
Can anybody confirm that all versions of *SM will handle server-to-server comms
beyond 9th September. The reason for my interest in this date in particular is
the way *SM generates the name of the virtual volumes. Part of the name is the
number of seconds since mi
Salam,
Try first to find out why permission on the pagefile.sys is denied...
Amr.
-Message d'origine-
De : ABDULSALAM ABDULLA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : mardi 22 mai 2001 06:30
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: NT schedule is pending
Any idea...
This what I'm getting in dsmsc
Hello Salam
Why will you backup the pagefile.sys file??
I exclude this file from the save
Mauro
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: AMRHAR Brahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Dienstag, 22. Mai 2001 09:38
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: NT schedule is pending
Salam,
Try first
72 matches
Mail list logo
