there. I found apar APAR PQ56173, but it is for 4.2.2 servers not
4.2.3.4. I've opened a PMR with support, but thought I would try the list
as well to see if any of you have an idea as to why all my information is
not being collected.
Thanks,
Diana Noble
se goes wrong before then.
Thanks for all the help and advice everyone offered.
Diana Noble
Quoting "Davidson, Becky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm sorry I should have been clearer. When I say server I mean the tsm
> server. Sometimes I can't log into a server from the
et
in from another server or is all contact into the server hosed? When you
say you are having a problem with a disk what kind of problem are you
having? Is it SCSI, SSA, NAS or SAN attached?
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Diana Noble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02,
I have asked our sysadmin who handles the hardware to look at things. I've
killed the server process and he is in the process of running diagnostics
right now. The disks are SCSI. The strange thing about this is that we
upgraded to 4.2.3.0 last Friday. We lost a disk on Saturday (not on the
sam
We are running 4.2.3.0 of TSM on an AIX 4.3.3 system. We seem to be having
a problem with a disk where part of our TSM database is. The database is
mirrored and it was my understanding that if you lose a DB volume it should
automatically switch to the mirrored copy and continue to run. Right now
We use 3590 J's and K's. I've been asked what the lifespan of these tapes
are. I've seen where the shelf life might be 10-12 years, but have not been
able to find anything about the regular use of them. Our tapes are returned to
scratch when they become empty, so they are not private tapes. It'
Scott -
Can you please explain your setup under Big Brother to monitor TSM.
Thanks,
Diana Noble
At 08:09 AM 11/8/02 -0500, Scott Walters wrote:
We use BB to monitor TSM.
Bill Mansfield wrote:
Is anyone using Big Brother to monitor their TSM server, or as an event
receiver?
William
This is the script I use ..
/* */
/* Script Name: Q_VOL_RECLM*/
/* Description: Display the number of */
/* onsite tapes */
/* eligible for*/
/*
>5) TSM server activity log from one hour before the error occurs to one
>hour after the error occurs.
>
>6) Client options set information (output from QUERY CLOPTSET) if your
>node has a client options set associated with it.
>
>That should be good for starters.
>
>Fee
s and
selective incremental backups. Does anyone have any information on what
may be causing this or what "type GroupHandler" means?
Thank you,
Diana Noble
I sent this yesterday but never received a confirmation that it was posted
and I never saw it on the adsmlist, so I'm reposting it again. I apologize
if anyone receives two copies of this.
>Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 10:01:12 -0400
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Diana Noble <
Has anyone out there tried running buta to backup an afs 3.4 server under TSM
Server 5.1? We are not yet at afs 3.6, but I am thinking about upgrading to
TSM 5.1. I was wondering if the buta process would still work under 5.1, even
though I know it is no longer supported code.
Also, in past pos
I would like to upgrade from 4.1.2.0 to 4.2.2.3 (and eventually to 5.1 when
we can get all the clients off 4.1). I have a 4.2.0 install CD for the
server which will run on AIX 4.3. From what I can tell I must install the
4.2 CD (do I need to put 4.1 maintenance on too before doing this?), then
i
Can anyone tell me why my activity log has stopped recording. Best I can
tell is that it was flooded with
ANR8216W Error sending data on socket 59. Reason 32.
which I believe is from the web interface (which was probably me). This
happened last night and nothing has been recorded in the activi
Thank you Don and Zlatko for all the information on management classes. It
really helped. I know what we are doing is against the TSM backup ideology.
The system was originally setup to do AFS backups only, which doesn't really
use the management class. The type of backup and it's retention is
t; Technical Architect - Tivoli Certified Consultant
> Professional Association of Contract Employees (P.A.C.E.)
> San Jose, CA
> (408) 257-3037
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Diana Noble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi All -
I believe I have my management classes all defined with a major flaw. We
do scheduled modified backups during the week and scheduled absolute
backups on Sundays. I have two management classes defined. Both have the
same retentions coded but one has "absolute" for the copy mode and one
Hopefully someone on this list can help me with this problem. I have a user
who backs ups several W2k machines. Six of these machines are having a
problems with numerous ports taken up by the TSM scheduler. All of the ports
point to the same PID and all are executing dsmcsvc.exe. The system I'
We have a user who is trying to back up a Win/2000 machine and is receiving
"ANS1340E Exporting RSM Database Files Failed" during the backup. The
backup stops after that. This is a manual backup, not a scheduled
backup. Looking at the list archives, I noticed that past responses were
to startup
Hi all -
I have a user try to implement backups for his sql server. He can get the
backups to run manually, but runs into problems when he tries to setup a
second scheduler for it. The output from the dsmcutil inst command
follows. Seems to be a password problem, but we cannot figure out
why.
Is there a way to assign a new admin to a client node? It doesn't appear
you can do it by updating the client.
Hi Everyone -
Does anyone have documented policies and procedures for a 24x7 operation
with TSM. I've been asked to put something together on what it would take
to have 24x7 coverage for TSM. I don't need the "how to" docs for specific
TSM procedures. Or if there is a manual or website you cou
> > there
> > really are others seeing the same problems besides just a couple of
> > us.
> >
> > Kathleen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Braich, Raminder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/02/2001 11:1
e hope they can have this
>ready soon! This is causing us a lot of headaches!
>
>Good luck,
>
>Kathleen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Diana Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/30/2001 11:22:46 AM
>
>Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL
Yes, our Atape driver is at 5.4.4.0. We initially went from 5.0.2.0 to
5.4.2.0 and saw the problem there also.
At 05:51 PM 1/30/01 +0100, you wrote:
>With the latest Atape driver 5.4.4.0 ?
>
>
>
>Von: Diana Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Am: 30.01.2001 16:46 GMT
>
rocode level of D22E. We have
>been on this level of code for quite some time with no errors. Our 3590's
>are also house within a 3494.
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Diana Noble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 8:15 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
We are running 4.1.2.
At 05:41 PM 1/30/01 +0100, you wrote:
>Are you using 4.1.0 or 4.1.2?
>
>
>
>
>Von: Diana Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Am: 30.01.2001 16:22 GMT
>
>
>Bitte antworten an "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
&g
3590 tape drives.
>We are running 3590E1A tape drives with a microcode level of D22E. We have
>been on this level of code for quite some time with no errors. Our 3590's
>are also house within a 3494.
>
>
>-----Original Message-
>From: Diana Noble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I had posted some questions last month regarding problems we encountered
after our upgrade to TSM 4.1 and thought I would pass along what we
found. We are using AIX 4.3, 3590E's and a 3494.
When issuing the dsmadmc command we received "ANS1033E An invalid TCP/IP
host name was specified". Resolu
I just upgraded to adsm 4.1 from 3.1. It appears right now I have two
known problems.
First - I cannot seem to label any volumes. If I run the label command and
ask it to search the library it just completes successfully without even
looking for any tapes. If I specify a tape, it claims invali
I'm about to upgrade to TSM 4.1. Some of the recommendations were to make
sure atape and atldd are at the correct level, although I don't see the
level specified in the doc anywhere. I was going to upgrade them anyways
and was told I could download them from ibm.com somewhere, but I've not yet
I have two questions. First, I running adsm 3.1.2.58 with atape 5.0.2.0
and atldd 4.0.7. I tried to initialize the 3590 extended tapes and label
them and receive only IO errors. Initialized some J's as well and they
initialized fine. Anyone seen this or have a similar problem?
ANR0985I Proces
32 matches
Mail list logo
