Several WISPs in area are getting hammered with 5GHz interference
especially with DFS hits, the normal channels are overcrowded...
Ubiquiti and Cambium is mostly what they are usinga few Mimosa out
there but I know one wisp who replaced all of his with Cambium and 60Ghz
AirFiber..
Any ideas?
--
where is the interference coming from?
On 12/17/21 11:34 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
Several WISPs in area are getting hammered with 5GHz interference
especially with DFS hits, the normal channels are overcrowded...
Ubiquiti and Cambium is mostly what they are usinga few Mimosa out
there but I
If 5ghz is no bueno then I suppose CBRS is the next option.
You still might have to fight for channels, but the cost barrier reduces the
number of players in the game.
From: AF On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 11:34 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Sub
Jaime is near the border with Mexico, so gets bonus interference from
across the border.
bp
On 12/17/2021 8:38 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
where is the interference coming from?
On 12/17/21 11:34 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
Several WISPs in area are getting hammered with 5GHz interference
especial
Or default your radios, set your country code to Hong Kong and start operating
out of band. If anybody comes sniffing around about it just blame Mexico.
From: AF On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 11:34 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: [AFMUG] Wha
Better antennas. Smaller channels. Closer sites to the subscriber.
Better use of geography to block noise. Lower AGL of APs on towers.
More antenna gain.
This isn't an equipment question really... it is an RF Engineering exercise.
All things equal equipment like Cambium 450 will outperform e
Another win this morning.
So far, I have a lifetime batting average of 1000. Never lost a case. Even
though I have another one against the same defendant that I am not so sure
about. I might lose the next case. Kinda a second bite of the same apple. I
might drop it if my attorney thinks I
Gee guys, I thought the mm wave radios were going to eliminate the problem...
From: Daniel White
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 10:42 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group ; Jaime Solorza
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What are you gents using?
Better antennas. Smaller channels. Closer sites to the
Fiber
From: Jaime Solorza
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 9:34 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: [AFMUG] What are you gents using?
Several WISPs in area are getting hammered with 5GHz interference especially
with DFS hits, the normal channels are overcrowded...
Ubiquiti and Cam
Well, technically, mmwave radios pretty much do eliminate that problem.
It's just that they add a bunch of other problems...
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:18 PM Chuck McCown via AF
wrote:
> Gee guys, I thought the mm wave radios were going to eliminate the
> problem...
>
> *From:* Daniel White
> *S
Like extreme short range, they quit in bad weather, things like that?
From: Mathew Howard
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 11:45 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What are you gents using?
Well, technically, mmwave radios pretty much do eliminate that problem. It's
ju
Yeah, that...
We've had pretty good luck with mmwave if we keep them under 1/4 mile or
so, but that's about as far as you can push ptmp and keep a reasonably
reliable connection. ptp mmwave is useful for several miles, if you use
them for the right purposes.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:53 PM Chuck
Is ubnt LTU not being considered?
On 12/17/21 11:02, Mathew Howard wrote:
Yeah, that...
We've had pretty good luck with mmwave if we keep them under 1/4 mile
or so, but that's about as far as you can push ptmp and keep a
reasonably reliable connection. ptp mmwave is useful for several
miles,
UBNT still around?
From: Jan-GAMs
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 12:29 PM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What are you gents using?
Is ubnt LTU not being considered?
On 12/17/21 11:02, Mathew Howard wrote:
Yeah, that...
We've had pretty good luck with mmwave if we keep them un
Lol
I actually really like LTU, but I just think it’s safe to assume Ubiquiti will
screw me over if I build a business around it.
From: AF On Behalf Of Chuck McCown via AF
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 3:05 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Cc: Chuck McCown
Subject: Re: [AFMUG]
might be LAA (License Assisted Access). The carriers are allowed to try to
offload data to unlicensed spectrum now using this.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:35 AM Jaime Solorza
wrote:
> Several WISPs in area are getting hammered with 5GHz interference
> especially with DFS hits, the normal channels
Like suing you...
On 12/17/21 12:27 PM, dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote:
Lol
I actually really like LTU, but I just think it’s safe to assume
Ubiquiti will screw me over if I build a business around it.
*From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown via AF
*Sent:* Friday, December 17, 2021 3:05 PM
*To:*
That wasn't a serious concern for me, no.
They tend to leave old product behind and stop supporting it in their various
softwares. "old" could be 2 years (Air Vision) or maybe a lot longer, but you
can't know ahead of time. If they've pulled the rug out from under me several
times and yet I
Based on what I've read, and my own experience with the PTP radios, LTU
probably isn't the best option if interference is the problem.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 5:01 PM wrote:
> That wasn't a serious concern for me, no.
>
> They tend to leave old product behind and stop supporting it in their
> va
19 matches
Mail list logo
