Re: [AFMUG] Shadenfreude

We refer those guys to the wisp. From: Josh Luthman Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 3:07 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Cc: Chuck McCown Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Shadenfreude Fiber customer called today. They want to paint the walls but couldn't remove the wall plate. They didn't

Re: [AFMUG] Shadenfreude

Fiber customer called today. They want to paint the walls but couldn't remove the wall plate. They didn't understand that they could unplug the wall wart to remove the wall plate. How does fiber fix these calls? On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 3:57 PM Chuck McCown via AF wrote: > Had our first fiber

Re: [AFMUG] SFP+ cage extender

We have enough IPv4 for static to everyone, but went CGNAT and IPv6 dual stack a few years ago regardless. I’m still surprised that we get almost no tickets involved with the actual CGNAT situation itself. We do get some that want to pay for “static” DHCP assigned public IPv4 so they can

Re: [AFMUG] Shadenfreude

Lol We get about equal service tickets for fiber and wireless customers, but our fiber footprint is about 3x wireless and over half of the fiber plant is almost a decade old. I attribute my excellent wireless skillz and awesome group of dedicated employees to that though. From: AF On Behalf

[AFMUG] Shadenfreude

Had our first fiber customer disconnect to go to a new WISP in the area. They said the new service was half the price of ours and they got a price lock for three years. Yeah, OK, but we will have your service on standby any time you want to reactivate it. The disconnect was Friday. The

Re: [AFMUG] SFP+ cage extender

Thanks Trey! Were you also testing Siklu -> Tibit? On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 2:35 PM Trey Scarborough wrote: > Carl I am pretty sure that is the same cable I used to test a Tbit to > radio connection and I didn't have any issues. Also I know they work in > the CRS305-1G-4S+IN. > On 3/3/2023 9:49

Re: [AFMUG] SFP+ cage extender

It does. Also does IPv4 CG-NAT very well. We made it pretty far without having to resort to CG-NAT but the time came about a year ago :-) Mark > On Mar 6, 2023, at 1:29 PM, Carl Peterson wrote: > > We use Juniper for BNG on a MX204 but I'd be interested in the Netelastic > route if it

Re: [AFMUG] SFP+ cage extender

Carl I am pretty sure that is the same cable I used to test a Tbit to radio connection and I didn't have any issues. Also I know they work in the  CRS305-1G-4S+IN. On 3/3/2023 9:49 AM, Carl Peterson wrote: I'm not doing liquid cooling.  See the pics I posted above.  Just need to extend the

Re: [AFMUG] SFP+ cage extender

But until major content providers become only IPV6, not seeing a reason to implement. From: dmmoff...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 12:00 PM To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' Cc: 'Chuck McCown' Subject: RE: [AFMUG] SFP+ cage extender IPv6 adoption is accelerating. All the

Re: [AFMUG] SFP+ cage extender

IPv6 adoption is accelerating. All the major content providers and transit providers are dual stack. The weak link seems to be consumer routers. I had to buy 3 that all said “IPv6” on the box to get one that actually did dual stack correctly out of the box. * The first one did IPv6

Re: [AFMUG] SFP+ cage extender

So nice to have an IP per customer and not have to use NAT... (gloat) From: Carl Peterson Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 11:29 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] SFP+ cage extender We use Juniper for BNG on a MX204 but I'd be interested in the Netelastic route if it

Re: [AFMUG] SFP+ cage extender

We use Juniper for BNG on a MX204 but I'd be interested in the Netelastic route if it does IPoE BNG. On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 12:24 PM Mark Radabaugh wrote: > Same. Way less than Juniper (which we currently use but are migrating > off of). > > Mark > > > On Mar 6, 2023, at 1:09 PM, Gino A.

Re: [AFMUG] SFP+ cage extender

Same. Way less than Juniper (which we currently use but are migrating off of). Mark > On Mar 6, 2023, at 1:09 PM, Gino A. Villarini wrote: > > We are using NetElastic for CGNAT + BNG, happy so far > > > > > > > > Gino Villarini > Founder / President >

Re: [AFMUG] Poor front to back ratio!

ePMP Force 180 On Mon, Mar 6, 2023, 7:04 AM wrote: > Is that a 450b mid-gain? Or is it an ePMP? > > > > IMO if you were gonna go back with foil tape you might as well go back > with a dish. Same time spent. > > > > > > *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Saturday, March 04,

Re: [AFMUG] Poor front to back ratio!

Is that a 450b mid-gain? Or is it an ePMP? IMO if you were gonna go back with foil tape you might as well go back with a dish. Same time spent. From: AF On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2023 2:13 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: [AFMUG] Poor