Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

ers. > > > > -PK > > > > *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie > *Sent:* Monday, December 21, 2020 10:27 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA > > > > What does the letter need to contain that you attach to the

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

You can view other peoples filing and see their letters. -PK From: AF On Behalf Of Jason McKemie Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 10:27 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA What does the letter need to contain that you attach to the application? I was

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

Oh yeah, and the stop buzzer contact info…. From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of James Howard Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 6:16 PM To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA I believe we just listed out as accurately as we could the ar

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

I believe we just listed out as accurately as we could the area that we were applying for. From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 12:27 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA What does the letter need

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

recently had my 5.9 STA approved again. >> >> >> >> -PEter >> >> >> >> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *James Howard >> *Sent:* Thursday, December 17, 2020 1:15 PM >> *To:* 'af@af.afmug.com' >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

gt; > -PEter > > > > *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *James Howard > *Sent:* Thursday, December 17, 2020 1:15 PM > *To:* 'af@af.afmug.com' > *Subject:* [AFMUG] 5.9 STA > > > > Does anyone know if you have to pay a fee to renew the STA? Our renewal > request

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

No fee to renew, I just recently had my 5.9 STA approved again. -PEter From: AF On Behalf Of James Howard Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 1:15 PM To: 'af@af.afmug.com' Subject: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA Does anyone know if you have to pay a fee to renew the STA? Our renewal r

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

; Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA Hmm… I wish they would tell you why it’s pending. The application status page just gives general reasons such as waiting for fees. We did file before the expiration (barely) so hopefully we’re good. From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> > On

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA IANL (I am not a lawyer) but my lawyer told me that as long as the extension was filed before the expiration date of the current STA then you are good to go. No FCC fees for the STA. Sean Heskett ZIRKEL Internet • WiFi • Phone • TV 970-871

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

IANL (I am not a lawyer) but my lawyer told me that as long as the extension was filed before the expiration date of the current STA then you are good to go. No FCC fees for the STA. *Sean Heskett* *ZIRKEL * *Internet • WiFi • Phone • TV* 970-871-8500 x100 - Office Website

[AFMUG] 5.9 STA

Does anyone know if you have to pay a fee to renew the STA? Our renewal request has been sitting in pending for almost 3 weeks but nothing is indicated as to why it's still pending.. -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

Mr. Trout, What you provided helped. I am not the normal person for FCC applications so there was a bit of a learning curve on some of the form 601 questions. I didn't even know you could do it online. I have now submitted after getting an email approval earlier. Thank you, Gilbert On Mon, Apr 20

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

I have gotten approval, I now must file the form within 10 days. The license is applicable for only 60. Gilbert On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 7:37 PM TJ Trout wrote: > File Number 0009030232 > > Look up that file number and copy paste using your irrelevant company and > geographical information make

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

I hope the massive amounts of applications just shows the necessity of us needing this extra spectrum long term. On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:05 AM Steve Jones wrote: > wow man, thats harsh, we may be small but we arent irrelevant :-) We > matter to somebody man > > I think getting inundated may

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

wow man, thats harsh, we may be small but we arent irrelevant :-) We matter to somebody man I think getting inundated may just get them to give it to us. The geographic data was one thing i didnt know, do i just do 4 corners and box in out territory? On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 9:40 PM TJ Trout wro

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

FYI it's not as simple as the FCC receiving an application and saying "you're approved" . They have to get approval from the incumbent license holders as well as the ntia? For each individual wisp. On Mon, Apr 20, 2020, 7:36 PM TJ Trout wrote: > File Number 0009030232 > > Look up that file

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

File Number 0009030232 Look up that file number and copy paste using your irrelevant company and geographical information make sure that you open and view all of the attachments download them edit copy paste with relevant company and geographical information. I'm guessing at this point the STA re

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

i cant find it when i went to do it it seemed too straight forward for me to have been doing it correctly On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 8:53 PM TJ Trout wrote: > i posted a tutorial on facebook wisp talk, or at least a barebone > tutorial, I guess I'm probably a majority of the reason that no one has

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

i posted a tutorial on facebook wisp talk, or at least a barebone tutorial, I guess I'm probably a majority of the reason that no one has received the STA. I think at this point it's not even worth the keystrokes guys... On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 6:00 PM Steve Jones wrote: > has anyone put togethe

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 STA

has anyone put together a tutorial On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 4:47 PM Gilbert Gutierrez < mailing-li...@phxinternet.com> wrote: > Those of you that applied...What schedules did you attach to your 601 > application? There is a lot with the application and being able to > narrow it down would be a he

[AFMUG] 5.9 STA

Those of you that applied...What schedules did you attach to your 601 application? There is a lot with the application and being able to narrow it down would be a help. Gilbert -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 open now?

ware. Not sure >> about Ubiquiti. >> >> >> >> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Thursday, April 16, 2020 5:51 PM >> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 open now? >> >> >> >> Kp needs to

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 open now?

6, 2020 5:51 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 open now? > > > > Kp needs to clean up their ad. It's really misleading, I'd hope that > anybody who sees it is smart enough to make sure their equipment can use us > before they

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 open now?

I thought Cambium was a license key not different firmware. Not sure about Ubiquiti. From: AF On Behalf Of Steve Jones Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 5:51 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 open now? Kp needs to clean up their ad. It's really misle

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 open now?

Kp needs to clean up their ad. It's really misleading, I'd hope that anybody who sees it is smart enough to make sure their equipment can use us before they go buying stuff, though most antennas are already good. Are the vendors requiring proof before they dole out the firmware on these? On Thu, A

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 open now?

I like to blacklist vendors who seem to harvest the email I only use for FCC filings/notices. These are the ones that end up sending unsolicited sales emails to a FCC-only address. I could just be mean though. > On Apr 16, 2020, at 3:29 PM, Sean Heskett wrote: > > have to have an STA > > FY

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 open now?

have to have an STA FYI every vendor that has anything to do with any kind of 5ghz wireless is now spam bombing my email since we received our STA. can say i blame them but it woke me up to the fact that some people actually do pay attention to the FCC site and then push out marketing materials.

[AFMUG] 5.9 open now?

KP just sent out an email saying FCC opened this up for use. did I miss something, or are they just playing on the Temporary Use approvals? -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

I'm hearing a house needs to burn down On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 9:44 PM Mathew Howard wrote: > That is true, but I hear houses burn down sometimes... > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 8:54 PM Steve Jones > wrote: > >> That doesnt happen. Everything is always on the up and up. I'll throw you >> three tecat

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

You should try a $7 bill and see what results you get. From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 9:50 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension? Apparently $5 isn't enough an

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

e. > One place told me it was due to tax implications. > Red Iguana could be softened up with $5 years ago. Now they look at you > like you are a criminal. > > *From:* Steve Jones > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 14, 2020 7:53 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

That is true, but I hear houses burn down sometimes... On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 8:54 PM Steve Jones wrote: > That doesnt happen. Everything is always on the up and up. I'll throw you > three tecate to agree > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 8:00 PM Jaime Solorza > wrote: > >> I have $20.00 if you need to

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

look at you like you are a criminal. From: Steve Jones Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 7:53 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension? That doesnt happen. Everything is always on the up and up. I'll throw you three tecate to agree On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 8:

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

That doesnt happen. Everything is always on the up and up. I'll throw you three tecate to agree On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 8:00 PM Jaime Solorza wrote: > I have $20.00 if you need to grease some palms.. > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 6:11 PM Dev wrote: > >> Talking to Congress folks/WISPA about pushing t

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

I have $20.00 if you need to grease some palms.. On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 6:11 PM Dev wrote: > Talking to Congress folks/WISPA about pushing to see if we could get an > extension on the 60 day 5.9 spectrum to something more like 6-12 months, > there seems to be an interest in raising the issue to F

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

I remember that day. I was fixing a phone in a farm outbuilding. From: Chuck Macenski Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 1:18 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension? +1 to the Alexander Haig comment On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 12:23 PM Ken Hohhof wrote: Not

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

just a PR blunder and not > a power grab IMHO. > > > > > > *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 14, 2020 10:51 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension? > > > > Oh, lol, I thought you wer

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

, April 14, 2020 10:51 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension? Oh, lol, I thought you were serious. that was a disaster. I like this admin, but I wouldnt be surprised if they has stuck their fingers in this On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 8:41 AM Mark Radabaugh

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

Oh, lol, I thought you were serious. that was a disaster. I like this admin, but I wouldnt be surprised if they has stuck their fingers in this On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 8:41 AM Mark Radabaugh wrote: > No, it was a commentary on Potus and his news conference yesterday. > > Being serious now - if t

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

So right now only the original WISPS that filed for the emergency use can operate which we are one of those WISPS and we did file for the STA within 10 days and we did notify the other license holders in the state. Thanks for clarifying Mark. On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:41 AM Mark Radabaugh wrote:

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

No, it was a commentary on Potus and his news conference yesterday. Being serious now - if the federal government says we are still in an emergency near the STA’s expiration date I think we are in a good position to request an extension based on conditions being unchanged from the emergency t

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

I didnt see these STAs come up in any of the POTUS press conferences. You're saying the oval office is involved in this? On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 8:18 AM Mark Radabaugh wrote: > I guess it depends on what “The president of the United States call[ing] > the shots” decides on when this is over. > > T

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

I guess it depends on what “The president of the United States call[ing] the shots” decides on when this is over. The bigger picture at play is this NPRM: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-360940A1.pdf The FCC has an open p

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

Are you anticipating an extension or grant of permanence? On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 6:58 AM Mark Radabaugh wrote: > Some of our 450m’s have seen subtle improvements, others have been more > dramatic. Nice to have some breathing room to push AP’s from 20 to 30Mhz > channels. > > Mark > > On Apr 14,

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

Some of our 450m’s have seen subtle improvements, others have been more dramatic. Nice to have some breathing room to push AP’s from 20 to 30Mhz channels. Mark > On Apr 14, 2020, at 6:56 AM, Mike Meluskey wrote: > > And they are beautiful! > 8x8 MIMO for our 450m’s > > On 14 Apr 2020, at 6

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

And they are beautiful! 8x8 MIMO for our 450m’s On 14 Apr 2020, at 6:25, Mark Radabaugh wrote: The STA’s for the original applicants were granted with the original letter and could be used with notification to the other license holders in the state. A condition of the grant was that you had t

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

The STA’s for the original applicants were granted with the original letter and could be used with notification to the other license holders in the state. A condition of the grant was that you had to make your own application for the STA under the company name within 10 days. Those applicatio

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

I thought it was the opposite and they were in production but there is such a huge influx of new requests that it will be forever to get grants because each has to be looked at by a human On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 9:49 PM Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > Very useful but is anyone even operational on 5.9 t

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

Very useful but is anyone even operational on 5.9 today? It appears the STA's never got granted from what I read in some other threads on here. I was told the FCC backed out of issuing the STA's because of some resistance by some group. On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:11 PM Dev wrote: > Talking to Con

[AFMUG] 5.9 extension?

Talking to Congress folks/WISPA about pushing to see if we could get an extension on the 60 day 5.9 spectrum to something more like 6-12 months, there seems to be an interest in raising the issue to FCC commissioners. Both Senator/WISPA folks want to judge how much interest there would be from t

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA?

decided to halt this process. >> >> >> >> Peter Kranz >> www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> >> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 >> Mobile: 510-207- >> pkr...@unwiredltd.com >> >> >> >> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *TJ

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA?

On Behalf Of Mike Meluskey Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2020 2:13 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA? We have been invoiced $70 by the FCC. This is for the STA we applied for as a WISPA group effort led by Steve Coran. On 9 Apr 2020, at 17:08, Kur

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA?

mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On Behalf > Of TJ Trout > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2020 1:54 PM > To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA? > > > > Peter, > > > > I called

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA?

ttp://www.unwiredltd.com/> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207- pkr...@unwiredltd.com *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *TJ Trout *Sent:* Thursday, April 09, 2020 1:54 PM *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA? Peter, I called them today, and basicall

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA?

On Behalf Of *TJ Trout > *Sent:* Thursday, April 09, 2020 1:54 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA? > > > > Peter, > > > > I called them today, and basically they said tough luck, keep waiting > because they recei

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA?

Mobile: 510-207- <mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com> pkr...@unwiredltd.com From: AF On Behalf Of TJ Trout Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2020 1:54 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA? Peter, I called them today, and basically they said toug

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA?

Peter, I called them today, and basically they said tough luck, keep waiting because they received hundreds of applications that each have to be reviewed individually? And that the NTIA has to approve it? TJ On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:54 PM Jaime Solorza wrote: > I got this radio from a client

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA?

I got this radio from a client who does work in Mexico... country said other ..I didn't make any changes...I was scanning to find a Cambium AP on mountain that serves several McDonald's but I don't have clean shot at it...they rebooted the AP and three clients came up...I am going to hold on to thi

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA?

Considering that's showing firmware 2.4.3, I suspect it's just an ROW radio... On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:47 PM Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > you apparently have the new firmware, did anyone get the Ubiquiti firmware > yet? > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:05 PM Jaime Solorza > wrote: > >> I just fired up

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA?

you apparently have the new firmware, did anyone get the Ubiquiti firmware yet? On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:05 PM Jaime Solorza wrote: > I just fired up an epmp 1000 from my roof top at home and point it at > Franklins...looky looky > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, 10:59 AM Peter Kranz via AF wrote: > >>

[AFMUG] 5.9 FCC Form 601/STA?

Seems like dead air from the FCC since last week on 5.9 Ghz Form 601's. When I talked to them last week they aimed to have the approvals done by Monday 4/6. I wonder if someone decided to put the brakes on this program. Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

ePMP and 450 support it with a free key from Cambium. I’m trying to find out about PTP 550 and 670. I’m told that UBNT is working on a solution. Jeff Broadwick CTIconnect 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@cticonnect.com > On Apr 2, 2020, at 9:32 PM, Jason McKemie > wrote: > >

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

Mimosa supports it. On Tuesday, March 31, 2020, SmarterBroadband wrote: > So 33 companies have STAs from the FCC to use 45MHz of the 5.9 band to > increase bandwidth during the Covid crisis. > > > > What gear will support this? 450? ePMP? > > > > Adam > -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com ht

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

ril 02, 2020 8:43 AM > To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 > > > > Any idea on turnaround time to grant or cost? > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:35 AM Kurt Fankhauser <mailto:lists.wavel.

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

510-868-1614 x100 > Mobile: 510-207- > pkr...@unwiredltd.com > > > > *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > *Sent:* Thursday, April 02, 2020 8:43 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 > > > > Any idea on turnaround t

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

2020 8:43 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 Any idea on turnaround time to grant or cost? On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:35 AM Kurt Fankhauser mailto:lists.wavel...@gmail.com> > wrote: yes cambium said they had firmware for EPMP On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

to >>>> move back. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> David Coudron >>>> >>>> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of * ch...@wbmfg.com >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

e’d be pretty interested if there was a good chance we wouldn’t have to >>> move back. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> David Coudron >>> >>> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of * ch...@wbmfg.com >

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

t;> >> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of * ch...@wbmfg.com >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2020 3:00 PM >> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 >> >> >> >> If only someone knew the answers to these questions.

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

..@wbmfg.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2020 3:00 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 > > > > If only someone knew the answers to these questions... > > > > *From:* Mathew Howard > > *Sent:* Tuesd

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

asked for 90 days or until school >>> resumes in August. If you need it longer, just submit an extension. >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:01 PM >> <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote: >>> >>> If only someone knew the answers to these

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

It’s actually the DSRC band, 5850 - 5925 MHz below the licensed point-to-point 6 GHz band. Sent from my iPad > On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:46 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: > >  > Lol...5.9 to 6.1 GHz is flooded in most of our areaRF signals don't stop > at US Mexico border ese homies! > >> On Tue

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

Lol...5.9 to 6.1 GHz is flooded in most of our areaRF signals don't stop at US Mexico border ese homies! On Tue, Mar 31, 2020, 12:55 PM SmarterBroadband wrote: > So 33 companies have STAs from the FCC to use 45MHz of the 5.9 band to > increase bandwidth during the Covid crisis. > > > > What

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

Did you notify the other license holders in the state? I think that was a condition of the STA. Mark > On Mar 31, 2020, at 8:06 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > > Lets just put it this way. If there are 300 WISPS nationwide that have > requested STA's and are show that they can deliver better s

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

Lets just put it this way. If there are 300 WISPS nationwide that have requested STA's and are show that they can deliver better service in this 60 day window I think there would be a whole lot better chance of the FCC considering making this permanent than if there was only 33 WISPS. Cambium sent

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

PS.. Radio service code QQ -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

https://www.fcc.gov/applying-special-temporary-authority From: David Coudron Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 4:10 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Cc: Peter Kranz Subject: RE: [AFMUG] 5.9 Any idea what we are looking for in ULS? I have been poking around and don’t see anything

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

z Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 The process of asking for your own emergency STA is not too difficult using ULS. -Peter -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

The process of asking for your own emergency STA is not too difficult using ULS. -Peter -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:01 PM mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> >> wrote: >> If only someone knew the answers to these questions... >> >> From: Mathew Howard <> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:44 PM >> To: AnimalFarm Microwa

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

> If only someone knew the answers to these > questions... >   > *From:* Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:44 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 >   > I would think

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

we wouldn’t have to move back. > > Regards, > > David Coudron > From: AF On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 3:00 PM > To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 > > If only someone knew the answers to these questions.

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

My snarky comment was more along the line of: “Gee if only there was a manufacturer on this list that could actually answer some of this”. From: Eric Muehleisen Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 2:09 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 Submit a "me too&qu

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

we’d be pretty interested if there was a good chance we wouldn’t have to move back. Regards, David Coudron From: AF On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 3:00 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 If only someone knew the answers to these questions

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

20 at 3:01 PM wrote: > If only someone knew the answers to these questions... > > *From:* Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:44 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 > > I would think you'd still want

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

If only someone knew the answers to these questions... From: Mathew Howard Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:44 PM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 I would think you'd still want to work on other options for long term capacity, but it

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

tial STA is only for 60 days as I understand it. From what I have > read, it doesn’t look to be permanent. > > Regards, > > David Coudron > > > > *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:57 PM > *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Us

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

f*ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> *Sent:*Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:57 PM *To:*'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>> *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 How permanent is this likely to be? One could think all of the manufacturers could roll out the software

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

.@wbmfg.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:57 PM >> To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' > <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 >> >> How permanent is this likely to be? >> One could think all of the manufacturers co

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

. > > Regards, > > David Coudron > > > > From: AF On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:57 PM > To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 > > How permanent is this likely to be? > One could

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

have to be done before they can sell > them? > > *From:* SmarterBroadband > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2020 12:54 PM > *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' > *Subject:* [AFMUG] 5.9 > > > So 33 companies have STAs from the FCC to use 45MHz of the 5.9 band to >

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

The initial STA is only for 60 days as I understand it. From what I have read, it doesn't look to be permanent. Regards, David Coudron From: AF On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:57 PM To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' Subject: Re: [

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 1:56:59 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5.9 How permanent is this likely to be? One could think all of the manufacturers could roll out the software without much effort. But perhaps part 15 testing would have to be done befor

Re: [AFMUG] 5.9

owave Users Group' Subject: [AFMUG] 5.9 So 33 companies have STAs from the FCC to use 45MHz of the 5.9 band to increase bandwidth during the Covid crisis. What gear will support this? 450? ePMP? Adam -

[AFMUG] 5.9

So 33 companies have STAs from the FCC to use 45MHz of the 5.9 band to increase bandwidth during the Covid crisis. What gear will support this? 450? ePMP? Adam -- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com