0
feet. If someone is practicing emergency landings in a rural area, 500 feet
could ruin their day.
From: Sean Heskett
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2015 4:27 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
As a pilot I really don't want a drone above 500 feet agl
It would take a pretty large investment to know what your average long term
costs are going to be.
From: Jeremy
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 6:15 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
I think you are on to something there Chuck! Interactive drone
gt; Airport exclusion zone would be important. I would like to limit them to
>> 250 feet. If someone is practicing emergency landings in a rural area, 500
>> feet could ruin their day.
>>
>> *From:* Sean Heskett
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 7, 2015 4:27 PM
>>
:37 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com
> wrote:
>
> Airport exclusion zone would be important. I would like to limit them to
> 250 feet. If someone is practicing emergency landings in a rural area, 500
> feet could ruin their day.
>
> *From:* Sean Heskett
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 7, 2015
m wrote:
>
> Airport exclusion zone would be important. I would like to limit them to
> 250 feet. If someone is practicing emergency landings in a rural area, 500
> feet could ruin their day.
>
> *From:* Sean Heskett
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 7, 2015 4:27 PM
> *To:* af@afm
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
*From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm"
*To: *javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');
*Sent:
day, October 07, 2015 5:32 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
>
> Perhaps if you posted “no drone zone” like no trespassing signs
> I think it would be fun to shoot at them. I am wondering if it would be
> possible to create a line
oo. I don’t know what happened to
> that guy’s drone, officer, I think it had a run-in with some wildlife.
>
>
> *From:* Chuck McCown
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 07, 2015 6:33 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
>
> Also char
@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
Also charge folks to be the drone pilot so it pits human against human.
I would pay...
Hmmm, what do cheap drones cost?
From: Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 5:32 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9
..
>
> Hmmm, what do cheap drones cost?
>
> *From:* Chuck McCown
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 07, 2015 5:32 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
>
> Perhaps if you posted “no drone zone” like no trespassing signs
> I t
uin their day.
>>
>> *From:* Sean Heskett
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 7, 2015 4:27 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
>>
>> As a pilot I really don't want a drone above 500 feet agl in my
>> airspace.
Also charge folks to be the drone pilot so it pits human against human.
I would pay...
Hmmm, what do cheap drones cost?
From: Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 5:32 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
Perhaps if you posted “no drone zone
shooting
range where folks can pay to blast a drone out of the sky. Costs more if they
have a camera...
From: Mathew Howard
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 5:29 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
Seems to me just make them stay below real aircraft and make it legal
to
> 250 feet. If someone is practicing emergency landings in a rural area, 500
> feet could ruin their day.
>
> *From:* Sean Heskett
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 7, 2015 4:27 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
>
> As a pilot I
"
To: javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2015 3:31:29 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
good, I hope they go bankrupt. These drones need to get reigned in, and
it needs to be legal to shoot them
ligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" >> >
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, October 7, 2015 3:31:29 PM
>>> *Subject:
If you shoot one down, make sure you pick up the pieces.
Drone? What drone? I didn’t see no stinkin’ drone.
From: That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2015 4:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
I think if you are going to go off
t;> feel. Apply existing regulations where appropriate. Nothing new is required.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>> -
>> ------
>> *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm"
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Wednesday, October 7, 2015 3:31:29 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
>>
>>
>> good, I hope they go bankrupt. The
fly over
private property with impunity. Much to the chagrin of many homeowners in
rural areas.
From: That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2015 3:13 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
If they had to follow existing aircraft rules, perfect
www.ics-il.com
*From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
*To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Wednesday, October 7, 2015 3:31:29 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.
ug.com
> *Sent: *Wednesday, October 7, 2015 3:31:29 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
>
>
> good, I hope they go bankrupt. These drones need to get reigned in, and it
> needs to be legal to shoot them down. Assholes have been disrespectful with
> thes
casm"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2015 3:31:29 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
good, I hope they go bankrupt. These drones need to get reigned in, and it
needs to be legal to shoot them down. Assholes have been disrespectful with
these things fro
good, I hope they go bankrupt. These drones need to get reigned in, and it
needs to be legal to shoot them down. Assholes have been disrespectful with
these things from day one
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Hardy, Tim wrote:
> The Federal Aviation Administration wants to levy the “largest civi
The Federal Aviation Administration wants to levy the “largest civil penalty”
it has proposed against an unmanned aircraft system operator “for endangering
the safety of our airspace” by operating drones in a “careless or reckless
manner,” the agency said in a Tuesday announcement. The proposed
25 matches
Mail list logo
