Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

What he released was what it was. If there is no consequence we end up with no security. You have to be certain what you're blowing the whistle on is actually serious. Draft anything is not (talking about policy and whatnot) draft is just an idea. Had snowden taken even one step to go down a

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

Which wouldn't have matter wether he did use his chain of command (debatable depending on how you read the hearing reports), as it's been pointed out several places that the whistleblower protections don't actually protect contractors - only federal employees. Tie that together with a historical

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

And we believe right to life for people who haven't had a chance to do anything wrong. On Feb 26, 2017 10:47 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" wrote: > I have to clarify, that response I just made came across very shitty to > Jaime, was intended tongue in cheek. > > But

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

I have to clarify, that response I just made came across very shitty to Jaime, was intended tongue in cheek. But releasing information about treason is not an issue initially for the media, whistleblower programs are in place and nobody uses them, if they do and they fail, then the press is fine,

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

And one person's rebel is another person's patriot. On Feb 26, 2017 10:30 PM, "Bill Prince" wrote: > One person's leaker is another's whistle blower. > > bp > > > > On 2/26/2017 8:22 PM, Jeremy wrote: > > Quite a slippery slope there. I think

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

One person's leaker is another's whistle blower. bp On 2/26/2017 8:22 PM, Jeremy wrote: Quite a slippery slope there. I think if they are leaking an attempt at covering up treason, then it is probably more important that we prosecute the person who committed the

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

Every White House as long as I can remember has had leaks. It comes with the territory. I will say that this White House seems to be leaking more than those in the past. bp On 2/26/2017 6:35 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: This should have been taking place the

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

Ya missed the bait. “robbery” democrat style. Like those that betrayed HRC came up dead now and then I would love to play poker with Steve. I think we would both probably bluff every hand for fun. From: Jeremy Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 9:22 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re:

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

Quite a slippery slope there. I think if they are leaking an attempt at covering up treason, then it is probably more important that we prosecute the person who committed the ACTUAL treason, rather than the person who leaked the attempt at covering it up. I don't think any of them deserves a

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

If they will leak insignificant information for free, they'll release devastating intelligence for a fee. All reports on the Yemen raid indicate they were prepared for our boys arrival. We lost a navy seal because of leaks. So I don't think it's extreme at all. The fact you think leaks are ok

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

Wow, you are really a piece of work Steve. Those people who released the trivial BS deserve to die?? There is the far right, and then there is bat shit crazy. Where do you think you fall? On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:04 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Seems like

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

You have a rather extreme viewpoint on this. We're talking about leaks that are closer in relevance to colonel Sanders secret recipe than we are lists of active nuclear launch sites. On Feb 26, 2017 9:04 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" wrote: > Seems like they have no

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

Seems like they have no loyalty to their nation. Hopefully many of them he killed during a "robbery" democrat style On Feb 26, 2017 8:41 PM, "Jaime Solorza" wrote: > Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and friends...I > agree it is bad to leak

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

Did the leaks come from John Miller, or John Baron? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 7:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OTwowno decoding ring for you.Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

Seems like they have no respect or loyalty to Trumporino and friends...I agree it is bad to leak high security stuff but maybe finally the truth about Roswell will be leaked ... On Feb 26, 2017 7:35 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" wrote: > This should have been taking

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

This should have been taking place the first time sensitive information leaked, I always assumed the white house would be a secure place. Leakers need to be prosecuted, preferrably executed. Leak in to the press is not whistle blowing. Bypassing all of the many existing mechanisms to go right to

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

The new administration has been consistently inconsistent. Old Mr. Orange was that way before the election, so no one should be surprised. bp On 2/26/2017 4:58 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote: Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the leaks.

Re: [AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

Funny that they leaked the steps they are taking to track down the leaks. On Sun, Feb 26, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza wrote: > >

[AFMUG] OT....wow....no decoding ring for you.....Spicer checks WH staffers' phones for leaks, vows more searches coming

https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2017%2F02%2F26%2Fspicer-checks-wh-staffers-phones-for-leaks-vows-more-searches-coming.amp.html#pt0-638843