Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-06-01 Thread Matt
After this work on the 1u will begin? On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > The production boards showed up today. I haven't tested them yet to > verify 100% operation. I expect the cases in a week or so. > > When I see the first case

Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-06-01 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
The production boards showed up today. I haven't tested them yet to verify 100% operation. I expect the cases in a week or so. When I see the first cases, we'll get pictures taken and everything up on the web. I used to do a long pre-order but we spent so much time trying to keep people in the

Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-05-31 Thread Matt
Did these make it to website somewhere yet? On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > Well, I'm sort of working on the rackmount. > > What I have powered on on the bench is the new 4 port gigabit > powerinjector+sync. I have a 450i, a 450

Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-05-18 Thread Mathew Howard
That's good news! These sound like they're going to be exactly what I want... well, the 12 port version is, but the 4 port will do for now. On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > Well, I'm sort of working on the rackmount. > > What I hav

Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-05-18 Thread Gino Villarini
sorry to hijack this thread, but is the site monitor generator controller not available anymore? it is not available at the store for purchase On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > Well, I'm sort of working on the rackmount. > > What I

Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-05-18 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
Well, I'm sort of working on the rackmount. What I have powered on on the bench is the new 4 port gigabit powerinjector+sync. I have a 450i, a 450, an airfiber24, and some random 24v ubnt radio all powered on at the same time with straight through cables. 2 power busses, each port individually

Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-05-17 Thread David Milholen
: George Skorup Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:11 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU? Is Forrest on vacation or does he not like me anymore? :( On 5/12/2016 1:27 PM, George Skorup wrote: Hey Forrest, you mentioned a -48 version of the 5ch PDU in the past. Is this still in the

Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-05-17 Thread George Skorup
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU? Is Forrest on vacation or does he not like me anymore? :( On 5/12/2016 1:27 PM, George Skorup wrote: Hey Forrest, you mentioned a -48 version of the 5ch PDU in the past. Is this still in the works? M

Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-05-17 Thread Chuck McCown
1, Slots 2-12 V2 etc. >> >> -Original Message- From: George Skorup >> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:11 PM >> To: Animal Farm >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU? >> >> Is Forrest on vacation or does he not like me anymore? :( >> >&

Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-05-17 Thread George Skorup
age busses is assigned to 6 slots. Slots 1-6 V1, Slots 2-12 V2 etc. -Original Message- From: George Skorup Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:11 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU? Is Forrest on vacation or does he not like me anymore? :( On 5/12/2016 1:27 PM, Geo

Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-05-17 Thread George Skorup
We're going to be retrofitting some sites and installing some old Trango ApexPlus radios. Going to inject with GigE-POE-APC's. I was hoping to have remote power control capability since we're going to be building up completely new cabinets anyway. Not only the remote power control, but getting

Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-05-17 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
Just got my nose deeply into R&D for other things. The board for the PDU's was designed so we could (at least in theory) build a -48V version. The underlying issue with it is that it would require power from a base unit to power up any radios - since we need positive power to run the circuitry.

Re: [AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-05-17 Thread George Skorup
Is Forrest on vacation or does he not like me anymore? :( On 5/12/2016 1:27 PM, George Skorup wrote: Hey Forrest, you mentioned a -48 version of the 5ch PDU in the past. Is this still in the works? Me want. Well, really it's a need.

[AFMUG] PacketFlux -48 PDU?

2016-05-12 Thread George Skorup
Hey Forrest, you mentioned a -48 version of the 5ch PDU in the past. Is this still in the works? Me want. Well, really it's a need.