What about sync/GPS? And are you on 2.5 or 5ms framing?
Nate @ Blast and I had a similar issue. We had 450 + Ubiquiti + Trango
ApexPlus. Throughput was fine on the PMP450. Directly attaching to the
switch/router at the Trango link showed no apparent issues. Across a
Rocket link, the clients be
Poor throughput on ePMP AP
What about sync/GPS? And are you on 2.5 or 5ms framing?
Nate @ Blast and I had a similar issue. We had 450 + Ubiquiti + Trango
ApexPlus. Throughput was fine on the PMP450. Directly attaching to the
switch/router at the Trango link showed no apparent issues. Across a
R
Are you saying there is some buffer bloat (or some other buffer issue)
in the ApexPlus?
bp
On 3/6/2016 1:42 PM, George Skorup wrote:
What about sync/GPS? And are you on 2.5 or 5ms framing?
Nate @ Blast and I had a similar issue. We had 450 + Ubiquiti + Trango
ApexPlus. Throughput was fine o
al Message- From: George Skorup
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 3:42 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
What about sync/GPS? And are you on 2.5 or 5ms framing?
Nate @ Blast and I had a similar issue. We had 450 + Ubiquiti + Trango
ApexPlus. Throughput was fine on
2016 4:54 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
Through a site router, yes, that's exactly what I was seeing.
On 3/6/2016 4:19 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Are you saying this is an upstream problem? I don't see how what you
describe can happen with downstream
ul traffic is going to one customer.
>
>
> -Original Message- From: George Skorup
> Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 4:54 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
>
> Through a site router, yes, that's exactly what I was seeing.
>
>
f the
backhaul traffic is going to one customer.
-Original Message- From: George Skorup
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 4:54 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
Through a site router, yes, that's exactly what I was seeing.
On 3/6/2016 4:19 PM, Ken Ho
Yes. My HW ID 2 links were even worse than the ID 1's. The GUI via
in-band management wouldn't even load. I couldn't get the links to push
more than about 140Mbps. Trango put out 3.1.5, but it didn't work on my
radios for whatever reason. They finished up 3.2.0 (which runs on ID2
OMUs only, and
We had seen some issues with ePMP customers on high-speed plans getting poor
speedtest results - we found that changing the customer's router's MTU from
Auto to 1480 helped immensely. Another factor was to make sure that all
backhauls in the path were running at full connection speed (in other w
we have the same Problem with the epmp Stuff..only problems and bugs
from the beginning!
2016-03-07 17:00 GMT+01:00 Darren Shea :
> We had seen some issues with ePMP customers on high-speed plans getting poor
> speedtest results - we found that changing the customer's router's MTU from
> Auto to
Mind if I ask what you're using for backhauls? I've got no issues. I'm
seeing fantastic speeds all the way around.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Daniel Gerlach
wrote:
> we have the same Problem
at the Switch Port full Speed with speedtest.net..webgui speed test
120/50 and with speedtest from CPE 17/10 with MCS 14-15
2016-03-10 20:21 GMT+01:00 Josh Luthman :
> Mind if I ask what you're using for backhauls? I've got no issues. I'm
> seeing fantastic speeds all the way around.
>
>
> Josh
Yeah... but what is the backhaul? specifically, is it an ePMP in TDD mode?
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Daniel Gerlach
wrote:
> at the Switch Port full Speed with speedtest.net..webgui speed test
> 120/50 and with speedtest from CPE 17/10 with MCS 14-15
>
> 2016-03-10 20:21 GMT+01:00 Josh Lu
Backhaul is PTP 800
2016-03-10 20:52 GMT+01:00 Mathew Howard :
> Yeah... but what is the backhaul? specifically, is it an ePMP in TDD mode?
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Daniel Gerlach
> wrote:
>>
>> at the Switch Port full Speed with speedtest.net..webgui speed test
>> 120/50 and with spe
--Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Gerlach
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 1:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
we have the same Problem with the epmp Stuff..only problems and bugs from the
beginning!
2016-03-07 17:0
el Gerlach
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 1:21 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
>
> we have the same Problem with the epmp Stuff..only problems and bugs from the
> beginning!
>
> 2016-03-07 17:00 GMT+01:00 Darren Shea :
>> We had s
Is this the same problem some people are saying is a Trango buffer problem,
but somehow only happens with ePMP?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Haas
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:28 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
We have the same issue, just
For me, no. They are all 1gb.
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sovereen, David A
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:42 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
Is this AP connected to a 100Mbps port while your others are
re all 1gb.
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sovereen, David A
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:42 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
Is this AP connected to a 100Mbps port while your others are connected to a
1000Mbps p
Burke
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 11:33 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
Have you tried a router other than the 2011? I have 1 site where I have a
2011, and It might be having this problem, but haven't done much testing from
the CPE side. Other sites with C
-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Joe Falaschi
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 1:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
We've seen performance issues if we're not using the correct power supply.
The APs need to use the 1G power supplies or you'll have issues.
Well that's news to me! Holy crap. They should put a warning sticker on
that.
On 3/11/2016 2:20 PM, Joe Falaschi wrote:
The other thing to keep in mind with the RB2011 is what port things
are plugged into. Ports 6-10 only have a 100M aggregate link to ports
1-5. If the aggregate of ports 6-
My rackmount 2011's will probably get replaced with 3011's, but they really
need to bring out a smaller desktop 3011 as well.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
Well t
e: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
My rackmount 2011's will probably get replaced with 3011's, but they really
need to bring out a smaller desktop 3011 as well.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] P
That is what I took from this post:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=63372
We had tons of issues at a site. Nothing made sense, CPU usage was in the
teens, but we just saw terrible performance and packet loss at peak.
Eventually we found out that we received more complaints on differ
top 3011 as well.
>
>
> -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:23 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
>
> Well that's news to me! Holy crap. They should put a warning sticker on
> that.
>
&
com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
Well that's news to me! Holy crap. They should put a warning sticker on
that.
On 3/11/2016 2:20 PM, Joe Falaschi wrote:
The other thing to keep in mind with the RB2011 is what port things
are plugged into. Ports 6-10 only have a 100M aggregat
gt;
> On 3/11/2016 12:43 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>
>> My rackmount 2011's will probably get replaced with 3011's, but they
>> really need to bring out a smaller desktop 3011 as well.
>>
>>
>> -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett
>> Sent: Frid
ably get replaced with 3011's,
but they really need to bring out a smaller desktop 3011 as well.
-Original Message- From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor th
er, a CRS might be better?
-Original Message-
From: Joe Falaschi
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:51 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
That is what I took from this post:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=63372
We had tons of issues at a
A couple weeks back someone pointed me to Roc-Noc, they are still showing 73 in
stock. Might be a little more expensive.
From: Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:01 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
i can't get a 3011 to try, streakwave do
AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
That is what I took from this post:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=63372
We had tons of issues at a site. Nothing made sense, CPU usage was in
the teens, but we just saw terrible performance and packet loss at
peak. Eventually we found out th
There is a smaller CCR but it runs around $400
John Woodfield, President
Delmarva WiFi Inc.
410-870-WiFi
-Original Message-
From: "Kurt Fankhauser"
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 4:01pm
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
i can't ge
I think they were doing end of fiscal year inventory the last couple days.
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:07 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
Speaking of Streakwave. Is everyone else having issues with the deliveries
getting stretched out
ere doing end of fiscal year inventory the last couple days.
>
> *From:* Bill Prince
> *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2016 3:07 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
>
> Speaking of Streakwave. Is everyone else having issues with the deliveries
ill Prince
>> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:07 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
>>
>> Speaking of Streakwave. Is everyone else having issues with the deliveries
>> getting stretched out beyond what seems normal with them?
: Daniel Gerlach
Datum: 12.03.2016 08:46 (GMT+01:00)
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
e Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Hohhof"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 3:26:43 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
I don't see anything in that saying the bandwidth from the 10/100 Ethernet
switch chip to the CPU is limited to 100M,
: Saturday, March 12, 2016 7:56 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
http://i.mt.lv/routerboard/files/Block-RB2011UAS-2HnD.pdf
I can't find any details on the AR8227, but if it's a 10/100 switch, then I
don't see it having a gigabit uplink.
---
39 matches
Mail list logo
