Re: [agi] Internal Time-Consciousness Machine (ITCM)

2024-06-18 Thread Nanograte Knowledge Technologies
In your opinion then, consciousness cannot yet be defined properly, but you know for certain that there is no such a thing as a kind of life after death, or a soul that leaves earth, even forever? How do you know such things with such absolute certainty? From:

Re: [agi] Internal Time-Consciousness Machine (ITCM)

2024-06-18 Thread Matt Mahoney
The appendix discusses consciousness, self awareness, emotions, and free will, but the authors are using strictly behavioral definitions for these terms so they can legitimately model them. They model emotions as having 3 dimensions of pleasure, arousal, and dominance. An agent capable of acting

Re: [agi] Internal Time-Consciousness Machine (ITCM)

2024-06-18 Thread John Rose
On Monday, June 17, 2024, at 5:07 PM, Mike Archbold wrote: > It seems like a reasonable start  as a basis. I don't see how it relates to > consciousness really, except that I think they emphasize a real time aspect > and a flow of time which is good.  If you read the appendix a few times you

[agi] The Implications

2024-06-18 Thread John Rose
It helps to know this: https://www.quantamagazine.org/in-highly-connected-networks-theres-always-a-loop-20240607/ Proof: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06603 -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink:

Re: [agi] GPT-4 passes the Turing test

2024-06-18 Thread John Rose
On Tuesday, June 18, 2024, at 10:37 AM, Matt Mahoney wrote: > The p-zombie barrier is the mental block preventing us from understanding > that there is no test for something that is defined as having no test for. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie > Perhaps we need to get past

Re: [agi] GPT-4 passes the Turing test

2024-06-18 Thread Matt Mahoney
The p-zombie barrier is the mental block preventing us from understanding that there is no test for something that is defined as having no test for. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie Turing began his famous 1950 paper with the question, "can machines think?" To answer that, he