My latest thinking tends to agree with Matt that language and common sense
are best learnt together. (Learning langauge before common sense
is impossible / senseless).
I think Ben's text mining approach has one big flaw: it can only reason
about existing knowledge, but cannot generate new ideas
I'm going to try and elucidate my approach to building an intelligent
system, in a round about fashion. This is the problem I am trying to
solve.
Imagine you are designing a computer system to solve an unknown
problem, and you have these constraints
A) Limited space to put general information
On 2/28/08, William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to try and elucidate my approach to building an intelligent
system, in a round about fashion. This is the problem I am trying to
solve.
Imagine you are designing a computer system to solve an unknown
problem, and you have these
I guess the first thing you would need for an Unknown Problem Solver
would be some way to determine usefulness. To be able to achieve
some goal the system may need measures of usefulness which span
intermediate stages towards the goal, or which are stacked in a
series.
If the system has no idea
On 28/02/2008, YKY (Yan King Yin) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/28/08, William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to try and elucidate my approach to building an intelligent
system, in a round about fashion. This is the problem I am trying to
solve.
Imagine you are designing
On 2/28/08, William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note I want something different than computational universality. E.g.
Von Neumann architectures are generally programmable, Harvard
architectures aren't. As they can't be reprogrammed at run time.
It seems that you want to build the AGI from
Hi,
I think Ben's text mining approach has one big flaw: it can only reason
about existing knowledge, but cannot generate new ideas using words /
concepts.
Text mining is not an AGI approach, it's merely a possible way of getting
knowledge into an AGI.
Whether the AGI can generate new ideas
I think Ben's text mining approach has one big flaw: it can only reason
about existing knowledge, but cannot generate new ideas using words /
concepts
There is a substantial amount of literature that claims that *humans* can't
generate new ideas de novo either -- and that they can only
WP: I'm going to try and elucidate my approach to building an intelligent
system, in a round about fashion. This is the problem I am trying to
solve.
Marks for at least trying to identify an AGI problem. I can't recall anyone
else doing so - which, to repeat, I think is appalling.
But I
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:20 PM, William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28/02/2008, YKY (Yan King Yin) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generally programmable, yes. But that's very broad. Many systems have
this
property.
Note I want something different than computational
--- William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to try and elucidate my approach to building an intelligent
system, in a round about fashion. This is the problem I am trying to
solve.
Imagine you are designing a computer system to solve an unknown
problem, and you have these
Mike Tintner wrote:
You're crossing a road - you track both the oncoming car and your body
with all your senses at once - see a continuous moving image of the
car, hear the noise of the engine and tires, possibly smell it if
there's a smell of gasoline, have a kinaesthetic sense of
Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is purely rhetorical gamesmanship
ben
I studied some rhetoric and while a learned how to avoid some of the worst
pitfalls of gamemanship and how to avoid wasting *all* of my time, I found that
the study, which was one of Aristotle's subjects by
Er, just to clarify. You guys have, or know of, AI systems which run continuous
movies of the world, analysing and responding to those movies with all the
relevant senses, as discussed below, and then to the world beyond those movies,
in real time (or any time, for that matter)?
Mike
Mike Tintner wrote:
Er, just to clarify. You guys have, or know of, AI systems which run
continuous movies of the world, analysing and responding to those movies
with all the relevant senses, as discussed below, and then to the world
beyond those movies, in real time (or any time, for that
Sorry, yes the run is ambiguous.
I mean that what the human mind does is *watch* continuous movies - but it
then runs/creates its own extensive movies based on its experience in
dreams - and, with some effort, replay movies in conscious imagination.
The point is: my impression is that in
16 matches
Mail list logo
