I'm literally doing about 5-way multitasking today, all "important" things that
demand my attention. It seems that my email time-slice is under-performing
under the circumstances.
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily de
world of difference
between the number of patterns that can be encoded and the size of the biggest
pattern that can be encoded; the former isn't terribly important, but the latter
is very important.
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address
bombarded with
indirect evidence of its existence. I would say that consciousness is at its
essence a purely inferred self-model, which naturally requires a fairly
large machine to support the model.
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporari
ve no real analog in wetware. This will be one of the clear
advantages of silicon over evolutionary wetware; we can design systems and
protocols capable of fine-grained parallel resource sharing between contexts.
But I agree, it would definitely be useful to have these things in wetware. :-)
Ch
es it mix in relevant data, it also tends to internally
generate data that it infers *should* exist. One of the many reasons eyewitness
testimony tends to have a mediocre track record for mapping to reality.
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address,
ors
in the system. The system breaks badly when you have extreme
disparities in the intelligence of the actors because you are breaking
one of the underlying assumptions of the framework that is required for
it to function usefully.
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, chang
foiled again...
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tarts from the
beginning of the field; you should have no problems accessing the content.
It is a well-written book, which is a good thing since it is sort of THE
text for the field with few other choices.
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address,
On 2/13/03 7:06 PM, "Cliff Stabbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wednesday, February 12, 2003, 2:08:04 PM, James Rogers wrote:
> JR> And it works with life as well as anything else. Consciousness does not
> JR> affect its intrinsic efficacy if used correctly.
&g
e pedestrian "simplest
answer is always right" definition falls a bit short.
And it works with life as well as anything else. Consciousness does not
affect its intrinsic efficacy if used correctly.
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address,
easily written a good sized
book on the topic without covering any ground that had already been covered
in writing somewhere else. From my point of view it is worth the effort to
learn though.
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily
intelligence
that is matched to a particular environment, you want a general
intelligence that will match itself to ANY environment.
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
attacking the problem of Go pretty much in this way. Of course, being able
to do easy abstraction manipulation at many levels simultaneously with
imprecise and partial patterns is one of the better tools in my tool chest
so I like to use it. Old saws about every problem looking like a nail
notwithst
w, so I'm not spending a lot of
time on it. My work plate is overloaded by about a factor of 3. But
eventually...
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
occur, and if you assume that the function will be
static during the recursion you may be surprised.
And just to be clear, its obviously a Turing machine since it runs on Turing
machines and you can run any Turing machine on it. It is just very
different from normal conceptions of universal computers.
al computer architectures will quite happily do infinite
computation, much to my embarrassment. ;-)
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
doing some types of computation that conventional universal
computation architectures do very well, so there is something of a
trade-off.
To put it another way, it is possible to write a universal virtual machine
that runs on standard silicon that is not itself reducible to silicon using
t the universe
doesn't care what I want and so I get right to it. Seems rational to
me.
I do find Alan's abject incredulity that anyone would want to use Unix
humorous though. :-)
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ign a silicon brain perhaps you should learn how
silicon systems actually work, no?
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ic internal details that a real operating system also includes.
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rous forums and
so it is worth bringing up.
All this does not preclude a smaller machine from having a very good
predictive model of a larger machine. Just not a perfect one.
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate yo
erences that people have? If you spent as much
time learning how to actually use operating systems as you spend
complaining about your inability to use them...
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go
ore on the "fast and stupid"
side of the curve than the "slow but smart" side of the curve if
balanced for existing architectures.
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go
hese types of
chips.
Ultimately, we'd like to move the code to something like this, and since
there is no design or performance cost to only using integers on standard
PCs (they work better anyway in our case), we haven't introduced floating
point into the kernel without a good reason.
software problem. The hardware
problems and limitations, such as they are, are resolving themselves just
fine. The software on the other hand...
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
development trajectory unless you believe that (3) or (4) are an absolute
minimum for the system to work at all (obviously I don't).
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
undations for everything
you'll need to know so that YOU can be deeply speculative. ;-) I don't use
my copy much any more, but it is a good bible to have around.
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
correctly surmised is an integral part of statistical
compression engines. There are difficulties with what you want to do,
which I will let you discover on your own (its educational). :-)
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 18:33, Pablo wrote:
> I'm looki
using massive DSP
clusters, which are actually designed to be used like this.
Alternatively, a PC cluster could work as well if you used very low
latency switch fabrics (like Myrinet or similar), but would cost a bit
of money.
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change y
uperior
to either Linux or Windows for this purpose if you get down to it.
Mixing the best of FreeBSD and NeXT couldn't help but to create a very
nice operating system.
Okay, I think this is sufficiently off-topic now...
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
feel like a single
machine without having to write special code in you application. Normal
process limits still apply of course, they just aren't limited by the
specific limits of the machine they may have been started on.
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your a
ience with both, but I see
no compelling reason to choose Windows for AI. As a pragmatic issue,
Windows is worse on the code maintenance side in my experience, and Unix
is clearly a better OS for certain types of apps. You could write your
app on Windows, but I'd want it to be able to run on Unix.
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(i.e. I/O, processes, memory
management, and so forth -- high level candy is largely irrelevant).
And good Windows code has the annoying feature of being largely not
portable.
But at the end of the day, use whatever floats your boat.
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubs
en there is
the problem of defining "language" for this purpose, since it is more of
a gradient than a discrete thing, much like "intelligence".
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/
An analogy would
be how they learned new skills on-the-fly in "The Matrix". The
integration is a freebie that comes with the underlying architecture,
not something that I spent much effort designing.
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 19:24, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> James Rogers wrote:
> > You would quite obviously be correct about the tractability if someone
> > actually tried to brute force the entire algorithm space in L. The
> > knowability factor means that we don't alw
On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 19:19, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> James Rogers wrote:
> > In practice, the
> > exponent can be
> > sufficiently small (and much smaller than I think most people
> > believe) that
> > it becomes tractable for at least human-level AGI on silicon (my
dvanced than I can
talk about without lawyers getting involved. It is sufficiently sexy that
it has attracted quite a bit of smart Silicon Valley capital, which is no
small feat for any company over the last year or two, never mind any outfit
working with "AI".
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/
at liberty to talk about this (or a number of other
things for that matter) in detail or I would. I apologize if I can't fully
explain some of the assertions I might make. Arrgh. :-/
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/
7;m aware of.
> Now, James, maybe you really have such a great intuition for AGI design that
> you can make all the right decisions without ever looking to biosystems for
> inspiration Time will tell, as with all our AGI attempts, eh? ;)
Heh! One way or another, we'll know in a f
he question. For me, checkpointing designs
against biological systems is mostly a curiosity.
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/
rceived dimensionality is startling, even
though they are both nominally the same source material and processed to
provide 3D perception.
Cheers,
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/
cessary for a working model. In our model, this
would cause a modest degradation of cognitive efficiency, though it
would still be perfectly usable.
-James Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/
43 matches
Mail list logo
